
I got a phone call last night. "I've got a story for you," said my friend the caller. "You can only use this on double-secret super background," said the source, "and attribute it to a senior administration official."
"But you're NOT a senior administration official," I protested.
"So? I've always wanted to be called an SAO, and you don't have to say which administration, right? Take it or leave it, but you don't get my story unless that's what you call me."
"What's your story? Give me a clue about what we're talking about." I asked.
"I know the real reason why Cheney isn't testifying."
I paused. Do I grant confidentiality and the distinguished but undeserved title of SAO to my source? I thought: what would Judy do? What would Novak do? What would Russert do?
So, ahem, I got this phone call last night from a Senior Administration Official . . .
It seems the Vice President woke up wimpering around 2AM on Tuesday morning, waking his dear wife. "What's wrong?" said Lynne.
"It's this dream I just had – a nightmare, really – about Scooter's trial."
"Dear, dear," said Lynne, trying to comfort her big guy. "You'll do fine. Everyone says so – Scooter, Karl, even George."
"I don't know. This dream was really frightening."
"Why don't you just tell me about it? That'll get it out of your system, and you can see what a silly little thing it is that scared you."
"OK . . . I wasn't in the courtroom, but in a baseball stadium, wearing a little earphone to get the play-by-play of the game. But it wasn't an ordinary announcer, and it wasn't an ordinary game. He was talking about Scooter and me and Wells and Fitzgerald, all in the third person. And there we all were, down there on the field. Here's how the announcer's tale went . . .
* * *
It looked extremely rocky for the White House team that day;
The defense team was in shambles, with little time to play.
After Ari told his story, and Judy did the same,
A pallor wreathed the features of the wingnuts at the game.
A straggling few got up to go, leaving there the rest,
With that hope which springs eternal within the human breast.
For they thought: "If only Cheney could get a whack at that,"
They'd put even money now, with Cheney at the bat.
But scores preceded Cheney (each detailed at Firedoglake),
Each said "Irving's a pudd'n;" each named poor Scoot' a fake,
The Freepers sat in silence, their cheering voices canned,
For there seemed but little chance of Cheney's getting to the stand.
But Wells continued onward, to the wonderment of all,
And the much beleaguered lawyers won't let Irving take the fall.
Each witness came, each witness left, and few are left to speak.
"Next witness," said Judge Walton, in this trial of the Leak.
Then from the rightwing bleachers went up a joyous yell–
It rumbled in the mountaintops, it rattled in the dell;
It struck up the hillside and resounded from the band;
For Cheney, mighty Cheney, was advancing to the stand.
There was ease in Cheney's manner as he stepped into his place,
There was pride in Cheney's bearing and a smile on Cheney's face;
And when responding to the cheers he lightly raised his hand,
No stranger in the crowd could doubt: 'twas Cheney on the stand.
Ten thousand eyes were on him as he came to take his place.
Five thousand tongues applauded as he moved at his own pace;
Then when the prosecution at Libby's case did chip,
Defiance glanced in Cheney's eye, a sneer curled Cheney's lip.
And now Fitzgerald's question came hurtling through the air,
And Cheney stood a-watching it in haughty grandeur there.
Close by the sturdy witness the question quickly sped;
"That ain't my style," said Cheney. "Strike one," Judge Walton said.
From the benches, filled with Freepers, there went up a muffled roar,
Like the beating of the storm waves on stern and distant shore.
"Kill him! kill that Walton!" shouted someone from the stands;
And it's likely they'd have killed him had not Cheney raised his hands.
With a smile of Christian charity great Cheney's visage shone;
He stilled the rising tumult, he made the game go on.
He signaled to Fitzgerald, and once more a question flew;
But Cheney still ignored it, and Judge Walton said, "Strike two."
"Fraud!" cried the maddened thousands, and the echo answered "Fraud!"
But one scornful look from Cheney and the media was awed.
They saw his face grow stern and cold, they saw his muscles strain,
And they knew that Cheney wouldn't let the Fitz get by again.
The sneer is gone from Cheney's lips, his teeth are clenched in hate,
He pounds with cruel vengeance his bat upon the plate.
And now Fitzgerald holds his tongue, and now he lets it go,
And now the air is shattered by the force of Cheney's blow.
Oh, somewhere in this favored land the sun is shining bright,
The band is playing somewhere, and somewhere hearts are light;
And somewhere folks are laughing, and somewhere children shout,
But there is no joy for Irving: Mighty Cheney has struck out.
* * *
Dick looked at Lynne, and she looked at him. Minutes passed in silence, until finally Lynne spoke. "Dear, dear," said Lynne, "Do you want to call Wells and tell him 'never mind my testimony' or should I?"
(with apologies to Ernest Lawrence Thayer)
Related posts:
- Could Cheney’s Lawyer’s Leak Break through the Cloud over Cheney?
- Cheney Refused to Release the Journalists
- Liz Cheney Warns Against “Walking Away” from Afghanistan, Apparently Forgetting that Dick Cheney Walked Away from Afghanistan
- How Dick Cheney Cowed Obama
- Liz Cheney Rejects DOMA, Applauds Hillary Clinton





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Fitz
Peterr! Cute!
Bravo!!!
Wonderful baseball tie–in. I am in awe of your poetical abilities.
It appears that there may also be some NASCAR analogies that can be made:
http://jalopnik.com/cars/news/…..236957.php
Brilliant
Oh, if only it were.
My fervent hope is that this trial is only the first inning.
If Scooter get’s convicted, Scooter gets pardoned, so why testify? No Harm No Foul.
Thanks for the laugh.
No joy in Mudville?
“This Sunday, February 11th, is a very important day in our nation’s history. It’s the one-year anniversary of Dick Cheney shooting an old man in the face. … It could turn out to be the least damaging thing the Bush administration has done.”
—Jimmy Kimmel
h/t dailykos
Heh. Timely. Spring training, pitchers and catchers reporting.
Go Mets!
And Cheney didn’t even suit up.
Very clever post! Thanks for the smile.
Nan
Funny post, Peterr. Thanks.
I suppose as a former academic and also former head of the National Endowment for the Humanities who fought the good fight against the cultural left in the 1980s, Lynn Cheney is highly qualified to interpret her husband’s dream, relying, of course, on Freud’s Interpretation of Dreams, which she keeps on the nightstand by her bed.
peterr, you knocked it out of the park! thanks.
We already knew Cheney was a coward. They will never let the truth of this crime be know.
Biodun @ 12
Thanks for the lunchtime laugh, Peterr.
And remember, sometimes a banana is just a banana. ;-)
Badwater @ 6
mac @ 14
If Scooter gets a pardon, that will make the Wilson’s civil suit even more of an eyeopener. A pardon will remove Scooter’s ability to plead the fifth amendment, and so he’ll have to testify or face a contempt citation with an openended stay in federal jail until he decides to comply.
However things turn out in this particular case, this isn’t the last we’ll be hearing of Scooter and Cheney and the shenanigans of the OVP.
Freakin’ marvelous, Peterr. Tnx :)
That was great! But really: applauding tongues? The fee for that poetic license must have been pretty high. ;)
Is it just me or does anyone else wonder why the State department hasn’t terminated Dick Armitage?
Join the Inside Government Club and ‘jock sniff’ Pulitzer Prize winning journalists while blabbing Classified state secrets about NOCs working on antinuke peoliferation issues. It really is unbelievable.
Great stuff, Peterr. There is joy in Blogville.
…and speaking of baseball analogies, Sunday was the one-year anniversary of Cheney’s moment of Ruthiness: “calling his shot” in a Texas field.
Thanks Peterr. One of my favorite poems!
We are all Harry Whittington.
I have to say that Fitz started me thinking about this poem with his “throwing sand in the eyes of the umpire” line.
ccmask @ 22
We are all Harry Whittington in a blue dress.
Eeeuwwww. :)
Neil @ 19:
Dick Armitage is no longer at the State Department. He left when his buddy Colin Powell left.
lol sos
‘You keep pitchin’ ‘em and he keeps missin’ ‘em‘, Peterr. Top notch.
If Novak gave it to Holt to inform the powers that be, can it be demonstrated that Novak revealed Plame’s identify in the paper as an agent of the White House? If so, can he be criminally prosecuted?
Does Novak have any legal liability in the civil case?
Peterr@16
Scooter’s probably been watching and learning from OJ Simpson. Civil suits are annoying but livable.
Biodun @ 25 Thanks.
Here’s my favorite part of the poem above:
Freud! Freud!
Sorry for the OTOh Hell Yeah!!Cruising through and found this at Digby’s, of all places. Makes me proud to live here for once.
snip
Neil @ 28
FWIW, my understanding (IANAL) is that criminal liability appertains to anyone who had classified knowledge and who divulged it. Thus Novak (that utter slime imho) was not guilty of a crime, but the person who treasonously leaked the classified info certainly was. And should be executed forthwith. Do not pass go, do not collect a pardon, eat hot lead suckah.
S.O.S. in MA @ 33
Whoa, you can’t do that! There is no death penalty for civil cases in any state, not even Texas. CIvil courts just make people pay each other money. That’s what’s so civil about them. :)
Further Adventures in Reading the New York Times. In 2 parts.
Well, this is the fifth on this particular subject and I hope it will be the last. This article is datelined February 14 and is entitled “Bush Declares Iran’s Arms Role in Iraq Is Certain” by Sheryl Stolberg and Marc Santora. I should say at the outset that this is not an awful article like some of the others. It is relatively balanced in presenting both Administration and opposing view points. It lays out Bush’s position accurately and gives the key quote from his Valentine’s day presser:
I’m not going to bore you with all the whys and wherefores of the article. Rather I wanted to concentrate on 2 points.
The first is one that applies to all the articles and that I keep pounding on. None examines the relative threat that EFPs (Explosively formed penetrators) represent to our soldiers in Iraq. That threat despite all the hype is currently significant but small. The article says EFPs have been responsible for “killing at least 170 American soldiers and wounding more than 600.” It does a disservice by not noting that this is over the course of 2 1/2 years and begins in June 2004. That EFPs have been around this long is obliquely addressed in criticisms about why the issue is being raised now. One is that there has been an “increase in attacks and American casualties in recent months.” This goes back to the first article in this series by Michael Gordon: that in the last 3 months of 2006, EFPs accounted for around 25% of American casualties. Juan Cole in particular debunked this number and it disappeared until the reference in this article. As I said at the time, if this number is dubious, then it is likely that the 170 number may not be that solid either. Despite this, it is increasingly cited as a fact and as here magnified by the absence of a timeframe. Even if it were accepted as true, it would represent less than 8% of American deaths over the period. On the positive side, the article does include criticisms leveled at the Administration of using the EFP issue as a means to scapegoat Iran for mistakes in Iraq or of setting the stage for war.
By the way, Novak’s column in the Post today decries the Republican Senators for lacking the will and the principles to stand up to Harry Reid’s “audacious power grab”.
P.S. I went for the polite and dignified reply.
Novak, you traitor, those Republican Senators never had any principles…all they ever did was pander to the flat earth crowd and suck up K-Street lobbyist money, while Bush dragged the country down the drain.
By ifthethunderdontgetya | Feb 15, 2007 12:21:55 PM | Request Removal
Part 2
The second point is that the article fails to notice that the story has changed. In James Glanz’s article of February 11 on the Sunday briefing, the link between the EFPs and al Quds was described as an inference and the complicity of the Iranian government was itself an inference based on this inference. Since then Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Peter Pace voiced his view that even if some material originates in Iran, “that does not translate that the Iranian government, per se, for sure, is directly involved in doing this.” His statement effectively questioned this second inference and attempts have been made in the intervening days to reconcile the general’s take on this with the Administration’s. This effort has included Bush, Snow, and New York Times reporters Mark Mazzetti and Michael Gordon in their article “Disputes Emerge on Iran and Roadside Bombs” (and yes, I analyzed that one too). Another mentioned in the Stolberg article is Maj. Gen. William Caldwell, the military’s top PR man in Iraq (who was also present at and likely ran the supposedly anonymous Sunday briefing) gave a follow up briefing Wednesday in which the claim of an al Quds, but not a high Iranian government, connection was also made.
So what changed this week is that the first inference (al Quds) made at the Sunday briefing has become fact and the second inference (Iranian leadership) has been quietly jettisoned for now. Doing things this way allows for a tentative reconciliation of Bush’s and Pace’s views. There is just one oddity about all this and that is while the story has changed in the last 3 days, the information upon which it was based hasn’t.
You see if Caldwell et al had enough information to state a fact on Sunday they would have. They didn’t instead they made an inference. Since then, this inference has morphed into a certainty. The information didn’t change but the political environment around it did. This is a recurrent pattern with this Administration. They cook the intelligence. When this comes out, they don’t come clean on it. They simply give us a recooked formulation. Things are happening in Iraq. al Quds and Iran are certainly interested players there among others. As informed citizens, we need information to make informed choices, not spin whether it comes from this Administration or the New York Times.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02…..ref=slogin
HotFlash @ 34
I see where I am definitely NAL and that I confused criminal with civil. At least (correct me again if I’m wrong) I bleeve that that there’s Federal Law against divulging classified materials, and against committing treason. So if the matter of treason ever comes up against any leaker and they’re convicted, then we can get to the highly uncivil hot lead part…?
PS – “not even Texas” — nice touch, that
ifthethunderdontgetya @ 36
Your restraint is very admirable.
Plame House pillow fight re-enacted in San Francisco.
pictures
article
Brilliant! That poem should win some sort of award.
What incredibly intelligent and creative folks contribute to FDL.
ifthethunderdontgetya @ 36
I request removal of the president.
Bush addressing his friends today at the American Enterprise Institute:
Anybody who thinks Bush takes the debate in Congress–and even Congress itself–seriously can think again.
punaise @ 42
Seconded. All in favor say ‘aye’!
Moreover, Bush has proof that the Quds had a meeting with Mohammed Atta, during which Atta turned over to them a shipment of aluminum tubes and several large b-containers of Nigerian yellowcake.
_
Biodun @ 43
Maybe the Congress should make a pre-emptive budget cut…not of the military expenditures at this time, but of the White House operational budget. Let ‘em eat peanut butter.
BobbyG @ 45
Paper knives for the frosting not included
;>)
Peterr- Hilarious, however the sheer length made think of a good title
“The Wreck of the Edmund Fitz/Cheney”
Then I thought, what about Patrick Fitzgerald?
Kinda ruins it, not fair to Patrick. So then I thought about American Pie? Or Treason Pie?
or Dick Cheneys Treason Pie? Or Put Me In Dick, I’m ready to play? Oh well, I give up.
“Bye, Bye Scooter Libby Goodbye!”
Thanks for the laugh!!
Wonderful poem, Peterr. It captures the all hat and no cattle essence of Cheney and this Administration.
ifthethunderdontgetya @ 36
Aiee, thunder, you done broke my restraints as well… :)
P.S. I get the whole Casey at Bat thing, too!!
But I’ve been drinking tequila and my mind wanders, sorry! ;)
From AP:
My bold. This is on top of the $2 billion a week that the Iraq War is costing US taxpayers. Money mostly borrowed from China.
Bush gives speech to geniuses at the American Enterprise Institute- sayin that things are going SO well in Afghanistan- that he’s gonna send more troops..
One never ceases to be amazed!!
ifthethunderdontgetya @ 44
Aye.
Cheney’s got a glum.
S.O.S. I saw that a minute ago, was wondering if it was another firepup.
:)
P.S. I was googling up AEI, I hadn’t seen this before.
Prepare to Bomb Iran. Make no mistake, President Bush will need to bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities before leaving office.
…
Recruit Joe Lieberman for 2008.
YUCK!
Grand Slam, Peterr!
dab from CT @ 41
I couldn’t agree more. You really should cross-post this over at DKos.
BTW has this been noted?
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02…..r=homepage
In which Scott Shane of the New York Times writes about FDL’s coverage of the Libby trial.
From the “No Shit, Sherlock” Department:
-Froomkin
Terre @ 58
I don’t have an account there, but if someone else wants to put up a diary and post a link here, feel free.
Prairie Sunshine @ 46
This kind of peanut butter? (Meaning no ill to the innocent, here)
Peterr @ 61, but we’d be stealing your thunder!
New Froomkin, and he’s smokin’ today…as usual! Great stuff from the get-go, including this:
Bolds mine. Genius…Froomkin.
Value of fact-based opinion…priceless.
Cheney hit a pop-up but was called ‘out’ on the basis of the infidel fly rule.
P J Evans @ 62
Hmmmm, let me guess without even looking…. having a Wendy moment here.
ifthethunderdontgetya @ 63
Considering how heavily I borrowed from Thayer, I’m not sure how upset I could be with that. ;)
Still, give me and FDL credit, and I’m happy.
punaise @ 65
Punaise. Never fails to amaise.
Great poem Peter- did you consider havin “Scooter huggin third”?
punaise @ 65
But . . . but . . . what about the two rumors caught off base?
Is there any live blogging today from court?
rwcole @ 69
I did, until Scooter — like Shooter — declined to testify.
punaise @ 65
Oy. Perfect letter reshuffling as well. I bow in your general direction. :)
(… but I thought that us infidels were allowed to fly, and not… oh fuggedabowdit, can’t quarrel with perfection.)
Shotgun Dick dreams in poetry, who knew (other than a few Senior Administration Officials). His image is now ruined for sure. Good work.
More Froomie:
It’ll continue to petulantly be “can’t comment on an ongoing investigation.” You just watch.
_
Hugh @ 59:
Jeez, Hugh. You’re about two threads behind on that one. *g*
I wonder if Neil @28 isn’t on to something about Novak. Didn’t his admission at a minimum suggest an “arrangement” between him and the White House with Republican lobbyist Hohlt as the go-between? Could this not fairly be construed as a conspiracy to illegally disclose the identity of an undercover CIA operative? Or was that circumvented by the extraordinary declassification by Cheney around the time Novak published?
Wish Fitz would charge and test this out!
pwrlght @ 71
Coming up later today on a blog near you. Most of the morning was taken up with Walton working on drafting the jury instructions in his chambers. Once they come back to open court, liveblogging will resume – check earlier threads today for more details.
Punaise – You know I’m not a fan of puns, but I’ll give you credit that your 65 is good.
punaise @
20
heh: a soft, wobbly blooper that barely clears the infield is called a “dying quail”. I kid you not.
dwight @ 71:
1:30 PM ET.
BobbyG @ 75
I think we’re going to be hearing that line a lot in the next two years, in answer to press questions like “Care to comment on Mr. Waxman’s committee’s work?”
Evil Parallel Universe @ 79
thanks – your long-standing suffering in silence is greatly respected. :~)
I have a question: is there a movie deal in the making for the whole Plame story?
Remember everyone, journalism in this country has never gotten anywhere further than THIS.
Peterr @ 82
Yeah, and as long as Fitz’s work goes on (assuming Torture Boy doesn’t have him fired ASAP), Bush will just continue to abruptly and rudely beg off (like yesterday) using the “continuing investigation” dodge. He’ll just cut people off mid-question, not allowing anyone to point up his hypocrisy.
_
If there is I’m sure Sydney Pollack will direct.
Jwoods @ 84
I would think those deal negotiations have long been in the works.
_
Peterr @
23
Fitz is throwing sand in the eyes of the Empire!
can Diane Lane be cast as Valerie Plame?
bonkers @ 89
touchee!
One question: Is Fitz now a Gael or has he been one all along?
Moving on to the more important news (after ANS’s corpse) -
Cheating scandal rocks Daytona 500
Driver Waltrip apologizes after video footage emerges of Lance Armstrong pissing in his fuel tank prior to his record-setting qualifying run.
_
punaise @ 90:
Separated at birth? Diane Lane is one of my favorite actresses.
RichardCA @ 92
I heard Fitz doesn’t like peaches.
Looking for some good news amongst the sinful rubble? Here it is:
Olbermann at bat for four more.
AP – Keith Olbermann will continue to be a thorn in Bill O’Reilly’s side for at least four more years.
When will Cheney resign?
From Lynne Cheney’s second book ” The Body Politic” co-written with Victor Gold. Here’s the Amazon description:
“When Vice President Bully Vandercleve dies blissfully of carnal arrest while bedding down with the doyenne of network correspondents, White House Press Secretary Frank Lee is forced to keep the news under wraps until the Wisconsin presidential primary is bagged.”
American Greetings Interactive is sooooo original.
-Insert faux sincere flattery here-
;>)
An obvious fabrication, no way LC hears DickC whimpering from the wing her bedroom is in.
Kathleen @ 97
It took two people to write that?
The trial of Scooter Libby parallels trials of organized crime families.
Prosecutors are shielded from the truth by lies told by the soldiers, the hit men, the thiefs, the criminal operatives. One by one, soldiers are prosecuted for their lies and as convictions and jail time mount, the prosecutor and the convicted soldier make a deal to turn evidence, eventually exposing the boss for ordering the criminal action.
What do John Gambino and Dick Cheney have in common? They both ordered their subordinates to break the break the law and they both sought to conceal it. What else do they have in common? Patrick Fitzgerald.
Biodun @ 76
Yes, some days I’m faster on the uptake than on others.
OK, Diane Lane is a good cast for Valerie Plame. Who would you cast for the role of Joe Wilson, anyone?
Does anyone know of a way to show our appreciation to Fitz and his team, no matter what happens with the verdict? The Fitz All-Stars have really restored some faith in the process for me.
Looking back at some of the articles from the Lawrence Walsh investigations, and how the D.C. establishment was able to neutralize him, it’s made me really appreciate Fitz’s actions. From playing hardball with reporters, to his laser-sharp focus, he has been able to get things this far without much help from a very unwelcoming Washington establishment. Bravo!
As Team Scoots get their millions upon milllions, and Team Fitz gets their hundred-some thousands, I’d like to let them know that their efforts are really, REALLY appreciated by much of America. Can we send cards somewhere? Can he be nominated for an award? There’s gotta be sumthin…
bonkers,
I said thank you to him personally. Hope that helps.
Peterr, I do believe you’ve got the FDL snark art mastered. Congrats!
Jwoods @
84
Breakfast at the St. Regis?
punaise @ 40
A Pillow! A Pillow! My Corporation for a Pillow!
Neil @ 101
Yes – the Bush/Cheney crime families
I’d rather have Jodie Foster for Valerie Plame…actually thought we settled on that nearly a year ago. ;-)
Wilson is a tougher role to cast, there’s an age gap of actors with the right gravitas for the role.
egregious @ 105
Every little bit helps! I’d like to do something personally though. Maybe we could have a Fitzmas Holiday here at FDL? I dunno…just something…
BTW, how did he react to you?
I’d like to see Tom Cruise play Scooter.
Rayne @ 110
Chris Cooper!
How about Anthony Hopkins for Wilson? And Lane for Viv Novak?
egregious @ 105
It would be highly inappropriate for anyone to do anything whatsoever to demonstrate gratitude toward Fitzgerald. He is a non-partisan person and holds a non-political office and the last thing he would want is for us to make him look partisan in any way.
Please express your gratitude with your internal thoughts and prayers, not with any sort of outward gesture (except saying “Fitz” on FDL!)
bonkers@104-red t-shirts?
FITZ!
Rayne @ 110
Harrison Ford?
Rayne @ 110:
Diane Lane looks like Valerie Plame.
bonkers @ 117
That’s the spirit!
Also, I did not mean to say that egregious did anything wrong. I’m sure it was a natural thing to do to simply say thank you when you saw him. But I think that was sufficient for all of us. The good guys know we’re watching, and that we care.
New thRedd.
And FITZ!
Former Sen. Fred Thompson, a.k.a. DA Arthur Branch (”I’m not an actual prosecutor, but I stayed at a Holiday Inn”)is unhappy with Fitz.
[*]
ifthethunderdontgetya @
56
Sweet mother. What do these people smoke for breakfast???
kingfish @ 116
Ha! Maybe we could send him some pictures.
I think a good makeup artist could make a convincing Joe Wilson out of Sean Penn.
*xyz @ 115
Wouldn’t hurt to keep an eye on Abu. If anything fishy happens we should all scream really, really loud. A note to Mme Speaker re the recent unjustified firings of US Attorneys might be in order, she did say something about it. Does Congress check and balance the Judicial branch?
EPU’d, even tho didn’t take time for comments (we’re working hard at breaking out of our snow castle here, puff puff)
Peterr, dear Peterr!
I just had to let you know…
I read the whole post, then read it again, and then sent a link to a bunch-a folks who I knew would enjoy a wonderful read.
You are a gift to the world. Thank you! ;->
Biodun — actually, I thought Jodie Foster looked like Valerie Plame, being blue-eyed and blonde.
Think I’d throw behind Sam Neill for Joe Wilson, age and coloring are about right, has the gravitas.
fresh thread gang. Up and ready for the reading.
Badwater @ 29
Scooter being compelled to testify about the crime for which he has complete immunity would result in more damage to Cheney. I don’t think Bush values Scooter’s freedom more than Cheney’s freedom. Bush and Cheney will let Scooter sit in prison and reward him when he gets out in a couple of years.
*xyz @ 120
Thank you for that. I am wandering my halls rather teary-eyed thinking about all the mistakes I made during my court time, and feared this was just one more. I didn’t represent myself as being from anywhere, just said thank you.
bonkers @ 95
my what-a load-a peaches too…
have ta luv that school system….
Link below was copied right off their webpage. YOU read it, & tell me what it says, instead of what th’idgets meant ta say they meant – oh sigh. Oh Georgia dear Georgia. THIMK!
Preview is Your Friend!
izardofwaz @ 131
I believe he can be imprisoned for contempt if he fails to testify, is this correct? Any idea for how long?
egregious @ 132
‘Gregious! I cannot imagine one single thing that your sweet and sincere self could do that would be a ‘mistake’. You are being 100% egregious, 7/24, and that’s never a mistake. {{{{{{{ trust yourself, honey }}}}}}}}} You may be unorthodox, but you’re usually right, no?
Badwater @ 29
note to Scooter:
“if it’s Fitz, best call it quits”
Biodun @
76
shame on you hugh? you have another life?
jeez indeed Biodunz
Usually it’s safer for me to hide at home and not Talk With People™.
The fact that I was willing to come forth and work in public, attend fundraisers for Webb, etc demonstrated my patriotic love for our country. It was hard.
Why I am so successful working in Russia is when I make my usual mistakes they just chalk it up to my being a foreigner. Sometimes I feel like a foreigner everywhere.
egregious – you done did good. no worries.
One thing about this trial coverage is you have a lot of people working while wounded. Lot of cancer survivors and the token mentally ill. Last I heard Pach is in exceptionally fine health. He might be the only one.
We talked about those of us who have faced serious illness being more willing to face hardship, recognizing that our earthly life might be very short. Time’s a wastin’, need to act. Stand up to injustice. Burn the candle at both ends, hell, melt it down if that will save people.
izardofwaz @ 131
It’d bettter be a helluva reward if Libby’s going to sit in jail for a couple of years. The alternative would be to cooperate with Fitz, which has got to make BushCo nervous. I think Fitz might just be making your first point to Scooter and his attorneys about what Bush values most once more this weekend. If Scooter comes to the same realization, he may just have some interesting things to tell Fitz.
HotFlash, punaise—
Thank you for your healing words. I think I’m kind of a child prodigy in a grownup body. On an intellectual level things work well but when interacting with the world it seems overwhelming.
egregious @ 140
Yes. I got a skin cancer diagnosis (malignant melanoma) last month, and I’ve been the soul of productivity. Writing letters, knowing better what matters. And strangely, happier since.
(((((JoyB)))))
That’s the spirit. Keep going.
punaise @ 136
punaise — don’t let this one get EPU’d. It’s too good.
rwcole @
69
Bush is on Third, he was hatched there, but of course thinks he hit a triple. Of course two ReThugs on the same base, somebody’s out!
(((((((egregious))))))) back at you! I’ve been enjoying your posts and observations very, very much as well!
HotFlash @ 134
Judith Miller sat in jail until she agreed to testify, until Scooter agrees to testify he would do the same.
Peterr @ 141
They have real power, their reward should reflect a one-time insurance policy premium on that.
Maybe Bush would like to see Cheney go to jail. Then he could really be deciderator and preznit!
Jeff Bridges as Joe Wilson!
I want to be Cheney, I do a pretty good penguin
I want to be Cheney, I can do a pretty good penguin. I have also been told that I have some really wierd eye/mouth mean looks and, come to think of it, I’m a bad shot.