
NOTES: (1) This is not a transcript — It's the blogger's approximation, and no one really knows what that is yet! But I do know you shouldn't quote anything not in quotation marks. (2) I'll timestamp the updates and will update about every 15 minutes, servers willing. The hamsters that run the servers will appreciate it if you don't refresh excessively in the meantime. (3) If you're not having enough fun just reading along the liveblog, consider buying my book on this case.
One more note: in (dis)honor of John Hannah's bellicose statements of late, I will not follow my normal practice of referring to witnesses by their initials. Instead, I will refer to him as "The Year of Iran."
Cline up, C and The Year of Iran
The Year of Iran: John Hannah, I work at OVP, currently VP's NSA. Advising VP on all matters concerning national security, foreign policy, writing an awful lot of memos for him.
C When begin duties as NSA
The Year of Iran End of October 2005. Mr Libby preceded.
C When Libby had position as NSA, did you work with him
The Year of Iran Very closely
C What was your position
The Year of Iran I served as Mr Libby's principal deputy for Nat Security Affairs, prior to that responsibility for Middle East.
C Describe duties then
The Year of Iran Trying to keep Mr. Libby and through him VP informed on all matters relating to foreign policy in ME
C Can you give us sense, unclassified level, on those issues
The Year of Iran Iraq, Iran, palestinian, Saudi Arabia, AQ My responsibilities touched on all those areas.
C Other deputies
The Year of Iran He certainly had a principal deputy, Eric Edelman, two other, one responsible for Asia, one responsible for strategic planning.
C All reported to Libby, each had particular areas of responsibility, Libby responsible for all those areas. You mentioned Edelman. Do you recall that Edelman left on June 6, 2003
The Year of Iran Don't recall exact date, but that time frame.
C New principal deputy took rein in July 2003, who was that?
The Year of Iran Victoria Nuland
C During the time between, was there a principal deputy
The Year of Iran I took on the duties.
C You were short one deputy?
The Year of Iran That's correct.
10:16
The Year of Iran Duke, Stanford, law degree at Yale. Entered govt in early 1991, worked for SOS Baker. In Policy planning, Asked to stay on in Clinton Admin, worked for SOS Christopher. Left for about a year, invited to come back by Christopher, stayed through 1996, left to get a law degree and start a family. Joined OVP in early 2001.
C May 2003 to March 2004, Libby's titles
TYOI COS, NSA Advisor, Asst to Pres
C You're currently NSA Advisor, full time job?
TYOI Yes
C Addington COS, full time job?
TYOI Looks like it to me.
C Fair to say Libby had two full time jobs.
TYOI From my perspective, yes.
C Daily info flow?
TYOI 10-12 advisors in my office, constantly streaming through 100s if not 1000s pieces of info on nat security matters. I've got an active set of meetings, either with foreign officials or govt officials. Try to support VP in his meetings.
C You find it challenging? Overwhelming?
TYOI It can be, yes.
C How well did Libby remember things.
TYOI On certain things Scooter had an awful memory.
TYOI Times too many to count, I'd come into Scooter in the morning, I'd give my views, give an analysis, show up 6 hours later that evening, have Scooter repeat back to me the recommendations I told him that morning. It was very striking.
C WOuld you call that to his attention.
TYOI I did once, in exasperation, but that was Mr Libby.
C Did he maintain files when NSA?
TYOI He maintained them through his own assistant.
C Volume of files.
TYOI Several person-size safes filled with top to bottom with materials.
C Safes would hold classified materials.
TYOI Those were the only files I'd have recognition of, since they were housed in the suite where I maintained an office.
C If Libby had files elsewhere you would not be familiar.
C Typical work day for Libby.
10:23
C How begin day
TYOI MIB with the Vice President
C What time?
TYOI 6:30-7 in the morning, often held at VP residence.
C On days in town, what then.
TYOI Join motorcade into WH, join a senior staff meeting, return to office, deputies have time with him, begin to brief him, alert him to issues.
C Fair to say Libby's time consumed with meetings
TYOI YES (emphatic), he would have in any single week had multiple meetings, Deputies committees,
C I'll take you through each. What you and I will be talking about has to do with his responsibilities as NSA.
TYOI Best knowledge i had, I was often aware of other meetings, on domestic policy issues.
C His COS responsibilities not a matter you concerned yourself with, let's talk about some of these meetings, Was Libby one of the Deputies who attended these meetings? Issues Deputies committee deal with.
TYOI High importance to US, where decisions need to be made, full panoply of issues, every region of the world, as well as WMD and terrorism, economics and trade?
C Deputies deals with every major foreign policy issue
TYOI Anything that is on its way to being decided.
C How often would DC meet?
TYOI 45 minutes-hour. Multiple times in a single week. Sometimes several DC in a single day.
C Did you from time to time attend with Libby.
TYOI Each agency would have the back bencher.
C DCs often involved strongly worded exchange of views. [translation, did Libby fight with State?] Fair to say Libby "held his own."
TYOI Very active participant in those meetings.
C Customary way to prepare?
TYOI For each meeting, someone on staff would draft a memo for him based on background materials.
TYOI Certainly times his schedule too full, he didn't read everything.
C Sometimes in a rush get a memo before a meeting
TYOI Sometimes even IN the meeting. He'd be briefed before a meeting if we thought something important was going to happen.
Sidebar
10:31
TYOI's hair is much greyer than in the picture above. I guess it ages you, planning a useless dangerous war in Iran.
C hands TYOI something.
C These memos have had material removed to protect classified info, correct? Are these memos that were prepared for Libby and passed through you for DC meetings? Dates June 11, June 12, June 13, June 14, and (one more date)
Walton approach
Walton These exhibits I will offer into evidence, they're not offered for the truth
C Take a look at 413. Is that a memorandum prepared for Libby in anticipation of DC on Indonesia, A memo prepared for Libby in anticipation on DC on Iraq on 6/11/2003? Memo prepared for Libby for DC on Pakistan 6/12/2003? Memo prepared for Libby for DC on Afghanistan on June 11?
TYOI Yes
C I've asked about DCs. Let me ask about Principals Comm meetings? Did he attend?
TYOI Quite frequently. The heads of those agencies that prepare for the President. They get together on a regular basis (not as frequent as DC) and engage in their own discussion on those issues.
C Head of State is SOS. Head of Defense is SOD, Head of OVP is VP. When you're talking about principals committee, you're talking about people at that level of govt talking about issues. What subjects cover?
TYOI Same full range of issues
C Did you ever attend with Libby
TYOI I probably would have in place of Libby. I don't recall ever attending in support of Libby.
C When you attended in Libby's place, what responsibilities
TYOI Take notes, keep a record.
C Be called upon to prepare VP for meetings like that, called upon to provide support to VP.
TYOI Notes to prod his attention, usually not in speaking role.
C How often would PC meet?
TYOI At least 2X week. Often more than that. Given that this has been a very active period for nat security, it could have been multiple times a week.
C DCs, PC meetings, would Libby meet from Time to time with foreign officials [didn't ask about Chalabi, who is on Libby's schedule at this time period.]
TYOI With VP and alone. A regular occurence.
C Process by which Libby would prepare?
TYOI Not entirely different, usually not as much background, we'd prepare with staff's own memos. A little background material.
C Different category: meet with VP
TYOI Yes, on daily basis. Depended on subject matter if I was included.
C Without delving too deeply, would the discussions cover full range of Nat Security matters [hey, I guess this means we don't get Dick either.]
C You mentioned senior staff meetings.
TYOI A staff meeting convened by President's COS plus Libby convenes his own with VP's staff
C Were both ones that Libby would attend regularly.
TYOI Yes, as participant on Pres side, conduct meeting on OVP side.
C Would he meet with reporters
TYOI I can't tell you he did it an awful lot.
C Were you ever present?
TYOI I may have been in the room once or twice, I don't recall ever participating.
C What time would his day end?
TYOI 8PM, 9PM.
C Only time you got to see him was in evening, when press of business had slowed.
TYOI Absolutely, if you wanted to get Scooter's attention.
C Typical patter for May 03-March 04.
Taking a break.
10:46
While we're waiting, Christy asked if he came off as whiny in person as he does on paper (or screen?). Yes. He has a really nasally voice and no apparent tonal modulation. ADD (Addington) came off as more personable than this guy (and didn't have the nasally voice). They really seem to fire themselves some soulless bureaucrats, huh?
TYOI remains on the stand. I've got a good idea, Libby! Keep this guy on the stand for the rest of the year, and we'll avoid TYOI!!
He just caught someone's eye, he's laughing a bit. Boy, they don't put the security bureaucrats through the same paces as they do journalists, huh?
Jane's here–she got bored out of the courtroom, I guess. She says Libby laughed heartily when TYOI told the story on Libby's forgetfulness. Yuck yuck yuck–these are the kind of people who run our national security!! Can't remember from morning till evening. No wonder they can't keep Sunni and Shiite straight.
[Marcy puts her soapbox away and will resume the liveblog now]
Jury's back in.
C Focusing on this time period, Iraq was significant event. Saddam had falled April 2003. May 2003, Libby with assistance from you was helping to determine proper size and role of security forces. Determining the proper composition of governing entity. Governance issue in Iraq, was a particular interest and concern.
TYOI Very important issue for us. [then why did you F it up so badly]
C Following fall of Saddam, Libby grappling with sensitive issues on role of Iraq. June July 2003, Libby considered plans for CPA, included consideration of alternative courses of action. Iraqi security, use of third country troops, and governing Iraq, incl when to establish governing body, and how it would be composed.
TYOI Yes, that's correct.
C Build up police forces.
TYOI Timing sounds right.
C Libby believed these insufficient to foster a peaceful Iraq.
TYOI The issue of the size and speed of new security forces was an important issue that was vigorously debated, Libby was involved in that as major participant. [Huh--Libby thought what they were doing was sufficient?]
C June July 2003, Libby urgent discussion of Iraqi security. Participated in basis for coalition and Iraqi forces as leading part of security infrastructure. US perceptions of security situation changed repeatedly from June to December, correct?
TYOI There were changes and alterations made to fit changing environment.
C Were those matters something Libby concerned with.
Fitz May I approach
Sidebar.
11:04
C Plans for governing Iraq changed repeatedly (names 4 changes)
C Loyalty of potential Iraqi leaders, which factions to participate in political process [like Chalabi dealing intell to Iran?] Libby active participant?
C Move to Iran. Events in Iran also particular concern?
C Why were events in Iraq of such concern
TYOI We had tons of troop in danger. Iraq was one of the two or three most important initiatives any president has made into the ME, concerning terrorism, WMD, democracy, in region of highest nat security interest to the US. [some laughs in the media room.]
C Libby dealt with Iran's nuclear weapons. Arrest and potential harboring of AQ members, and Iran's involvement in Iraq. Monitored WMD efforts, whether Iran would sign IAEA protocol,
TYOI Those were a concern as soon as I started the job.
C Live issues in May 03-March 04. Also evaluated Iranian efforts to influence IRaq. Considered methods to discourage Iranian support for terror groups inside and outside of Iran.
TYOI A very active effort to start Iranian terrorism either against its neighbors or American targets in the ME.
C Also monitored student protests in Iran. Student protests erupted.
TYOI Signs of internal turmoil in Iran, that "people" in USG monitored quite closely.
C Student protests something that you and Libby were monitoring.
TYOI tried to watch internal sit in Iran closely.
C Iran harboring AQ leaders, some of whom had contacts outside of Iran.
TYOI THis has all been declassified by govt?
C Just a yes or no, please?
TYOI Yes.
C Libby considered possible means of obtaining custody of AQ terrorists.
C Looking at it in unclassified terms, why was Iran such a concern.
TYOI Iran a major state in ME, one of the most populous, for the last 25 years a declared adversary of the US, probably trying to acquire nukes, and WMD, major state sponsor of terrorism, in this case, shared a border with Iraq at a time when we had forces in Iraq. Some reason to believe Iran trying to undermine US purposes.
C For you and Libby. Dealing with Iran Libby devoted considerable amount of time and attention. Turn to ME [hey, Cline, Iraq IS theME]
C Addressed the Israel-Palestine relationship including Abbas as alternative to Arafat, addressed threat that Hamas posed in ME. Monitored developments between Israel and Palestinians. Marred with ongoing fighting between Israel and militants. Libby considered how continued attacks could delay plans for peace. Describe plan for peace?
TYOI Peace would not be possible with Arafat. US thereupon worked very hard to see if we could foster some kind of new leaders [you mean like Hamas?, what we ended up getting] that would run a clean government. First time in history that we'd seen the emergence, someone took job of prime minister, would begin to take authority away from Arafat. That individual was Abbas.
C Continuing terror attacks, would disrupt plan for peace. Assessed intentions and level of corruption and depth of their relationship with terrorist. Evaluating leaders conduct and assessing possible course of action. Possible withdrawal from Gaza. Met with leaders regarding borders, settlements, security. Assessing whether PA had sufficient security forces. May 1 2003, installed first Prime Minister, potentially first govt not dominated by Arafat. US sought to support new leadership. By encouraging new steps, including disengage from Gaza. New govt fell within six months. Why were these developments in the ME a matter of such concern.
TYOI Historical perspective, every American president has said peace is a high national priority in order to advance our own interests, this conflict seen as part of that effort, and in this case, Bush himself had invested "laid out a vision" for a new middle east, a new Palestinian leadership, we were on the cusp of achieving in this time period.
11:21



156 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
The Year of Iran. Heh.
Morning EW. Again, you had me at the edge of my seat yesterday. thanks.
maybe TYI? kinda hard to read.
Jeebus, these people are breeding!
New visitors to FDL live-blog of Libby Trial, please read
The live-blogging is creating enormous demands on the FDL servers. For that reason, Emptywheel is updating only every 20 minutes or so, and time-stamping each update. Please do not “reload” the page more frequently than that. Also, please be judicious in your use of comments (see below), and how often you refresh them, to reduce demands on the servers.
Peterr wrote:
A few reminders to the regulars and words of welcome to newcomers. .
FDL’s comments are moderated, mostly to eliminate the mass spam that flies around the Internet. All comments run first through an automated spam filter, and if caught, are then checked by human moderators, because in addition to spam, the filters also catch regular comments from time to time.
Here’s some info that will keep your comments from landing in moderation or otherwise clog things up and make life difficult for the mods:
1. Size matters. Long posts get automatically put in moderation and require the mods to set them free. If you want to use a post from elsewhere, don’t cut and paste the whole thing; just give us a link and post a short snippet. It saves space here, and gives the original author the traffic they deserve on their site.
2. Words matter. Especially those words that appear in email spam. Creative use of asterisks in words like “ins*rance” or “vi*gra” will keep things from getting caught in the filters.
3. Links matter. If you put a comment in with more than two or three links, it will end up in moderation. If you absolutely, positively have to have multiple links, you probably want to split it into multiple comments.
4. Attribution matters. If you are posting a news item, give us a link so we know where it came from, how timely it is, and how credible it is.
5. Preview is your friend. Before you send that post, especially if you’ve used bold, italics, or inserted a link, check it out by clicking the preview button before you submit it. It saves on the cleaning bills.
6. Beware the ziggurat! That is, when you quote a comment that quotes a comment that quotes a comment, etc. the resulting nest can “bust the margins” of the webpage. To correct this, the mods have to go in and mess with the coding . . . it’s no fun, and can easily be avoided if you snip out some of the innermost comments of the nest or simply start a new comment and point back to the original with “Jane @ 25″ or some other referent.
Finally, and most importantly: Do not feed the trolls. It just encourages them, and makes life difficult for the mods. Ignore the trolls.
If your comments do end up in moderation, don’t panic. The mods will see them, and free them up in short order. Comments that get held up in moderation, however, do NOT appear if you simply hit “Refresh Comments.” They come up when the entire page is reloaded using F5 or your browser’s “reload” function. Every so often, it’s worth reloading the page to see what might have been missed.
That’s also how Emptywheel makes her updates on the action in the courthouse. It keeps all the courtroom action in one place. Have mercy on the servers, and don’t keep pounding away at them by reloading the page every 30 seconds to find The Latest New Thing. If she can wait 20 minutes to update, you can wait 20 minutes to reload.
And if you’re able, toss a few $$, euros, shekels, or other fun currencies into the FDL donation basket at the bottom of the post. That’s what makes this all possible.
Welcome to the ‘Lake! The water’s warm, so jump right in.
Thanx
John Hannah worked for Warren Christopher and now he’s working for Cheney? Talk about mixing ideologies.
Hannah is, of course, a fully paid-up member of the PNAC/AIPAC Thousand Year Israel brigade just as are Libby, Wurmser, Feith, Wolfowitz, Edelman etc etc……. their first loyalty is NOT to the US!
Here’s an invitation. When the server load gets high, as it may well become today — you may wanna join some of us at a live-chat on another server, over at http://gabbly.com/firedoglake.comIt’s a fun kinda chat-app. Using it doesn’t burden FDL’s servers at all. We’ve had as many as 65 folx in there at one point last week. It’s a good place to discuss any sort of Libby-related stuff at a far faster pace than is possible in these threads.
Rayne introduced it a few days back and imho it’s cool. Sometimes we get harrassed by hackers, in which case we retreat to a private redoubt. Others of us know how to get its URL to you without publishing it here. If you need its URL, please post your request in an FDL comment string.
If you wanna join us, C U over in chat-land. Remember, because Gabbly runs on a completely other server somewhere on the ‘net, using it takes some of the heavy load off the FDL servers!
Hint: Use two browser windows. Put the above URL in one, and the real FDL (this one) in the other. Position the windows where you can see both the chat about FDL and the real FDL. Refresh only the REAL FDL window.
Go FDL and Godspeed.
I second the proposal for using intitials TYI. This is not a pleasant read.
TYOI is cute but it makes it harder to read; it’s a distraction IMO that doesn’t add any value.
So, Scooter had an “awful memory”?
ROTFLMFAO.
I believe those would be “things where it was convenient for him to have forgotten”?
EPU question still applies:
Was Abramson’s testimony in front of the jury? I wasn’t clear on that.
I can only imagine how the crowd in the gallery laughed at the “tuning out” comment. I’m curious if the jury heard this as well, and if there was any visible reaction on their part.
Is the jury in the room now for Hannah?
(agreed on “The” being very confusing as an acronym).
Fitz didn’t object to that as calling for speculation?
Heh. “The Year of Iran.”
Shortened version of “Whatever DeadEye says, just do it.”
Thanks, Siun, SOS, for the Road Rules and the Gabbly invite.
Ugh, back to work…
If one works undercover, is there ever a record of them as an employee?
Hi egregious!
So they’re gonna show how poor little scooter is in the beginning stages of alzhiemers disease. Perhaps it’s just selective memory instead?
The Year of Iran 10-12 advisors in my office, constantly streaming through 100s if not 1000s pieces of info on nat security matters. I’ve got an active set of meetings, either with foreign officials or govt officials. Try to support VP in his meetings.
Calling John Murtha: You, know, at the very least, we could cut down on our future military spending by cutting the funds for shooter’s office. it’s a two-fer, we’d stop world war iii and help balance the budget.
Tap Duncan @ 18
It worked for RayGun.
Yeah, me too on The Year of Iraq sobriquet. I thought I was the only one.
.
This “Year or Iran” thing is cracking me up.
LandOfTheFree @ 13
Yes on both counts. The only thing that was proposed to do outside of the jury was Mitchell, but we won’t be seeing her it seems. We’ll be bored silly with tedious explanations of Libby’s heroic schedule.
TYI would make it lots easier, please.
Your year of Iran is not a very good idea. I gave up reading after two entries. Very distracting. The emphasis should be on the testimony and not on your feelings.
Thank you again and again for all your hard work. Luckily I am ‘working’ from home today!
Tap Duncan @
18
He suffered from TPRD.
Transient Plame Related Dementia.
Just as this morning I am afflicted with TOR, Transient Opthamological Rectalitis – I just can’t see my ass goin’ to the office.
_
Cheney was visited by the Men in Black?
If Libby’s memory is so “awful”, why did they give him so many “important” things to do. This is pathetic. That actually throws him under the bus in my opinion. That is blatantly attacking him and doesn’t help him at all, and it makes them appear even more deviously incompetent than they already are. Their lie upon lie continues to put them in a no-win situation.
Folks — Unless and until you are doing the liveblogging, leave off the critique of the choice of words. Marcy’s working her fingers off and if she wants to emphasize something while she’s typing it’s her call.
Capice?
well – here’s the memory defense.
Scoots isn’t gonna testify.
Good time to make donations to this website.
At least we might finally get some real cross examination! Fitz and his team have been swatting away the “reporters Libby didn’t leak to” like flies!
so damn busy, but still made time to out plame
[Guiltily]–b/c I worry about the server but I love the “The Year of Iran” because it shows us exactly what is at stake here. Over and over again. I hope the MSM is reading Marcie’s blogging.
Scooter has a “terrible” memory ?
Just the kind of mind you want working on national security issues.
What bullshit.
Really bad idea. makes testimony unreadable. Better to edit it out.
Not sure what the defense is doing with all the ghost witnesses, besides pissing Walton off royally, but is this a common practice in litigation?
Fitz hasn’t been doing extensive cross exams.
But Fitz really could make Hannah look foolish if he were to ask whether Hannah ever thought it was odd that a man with such poor memory, by his account, was in the lead staffer in charge of so many complex and critical national security matters.
The larger point is that Hannah is trying to advance two claims that don’t seem logically consistent (1) that Libby had a bad, even horrible, memory (2) that Libby was sitting in on endless meetings and handling voluminous paperwork on the most critical national securities matters.
If (1) is true, then how the hell could anyone hire Libby to deal with (2)?
Pudentilla @
19
well said, Pud….
Thinking through the “bad memory” defense… would it not make sense that Cheney wouldn’t want his right-hand man to be someone with a serious memory problem?
Also, wouldn’t a person who is so darn forgetful and has such an incredibly important and powerful job therefore always take meticulous notes? It would be the only way to function somewhat well in such a high-profile, high stress job.
Even if he sometimes forgets to tie his shoes in the morning, I still have a very difficult time believing he could have forgoten about Plame’s identity and job when Cheney was making it a BIG DEAL to discredit Wilson and had already revealed Plame’s ID to Scooter. It just doesn’t fly the smell test at all.
inmymind’s eye @ 38
another point for appeal, imho
Jane S. @ 35
Agreed. “The Year of Iran” is exactly the message we need to get out about this administration. We need to stop them from repeating Iraq. Marcy, thank you.
biff diggerence @ 36
Actually a good thing. Tossing Fitz (to riff on his baseball analogy) a slow hanging curveball. BAM! Dinger, outa the park.
_
I too am very busy, but I find a moment to catch up here, and probably will remember that later. But he was verrrrry busy.
Jim E. @ 9
i make a third
Um, okay is anyone else bored with this..the Scooter was a VIP and VBP defense, already. Fer chrissakes of course he should have been in his position…and the lame selective memory loss caused him to invent the same version of the story to the FBI and the GJ… bore the jurors in to acquittal defense isn’t going to work with this internet armchair juror. Almost tempted to actually go do some work that I should be doing.
Come o*xyz @ 43
Come on, it’s impossible to read.
It worked for RayGun.
Convicted felon Admiral Poindexter might differ on that.
-
I guess we can copy and paste the entire transcript into Word and find and replace “The Year of Iran”.
He didn’t have such an “awful memory” when it came to remembering the lies he needed to tell.
So Libby is the equivalent of the main guy in ‘Memento’.
Tattoos and post-it notes all over his body just to remember what happened 4 hours ago.
Nice hiring choice.
Gosh, Irving had a vewwyy, vewwyy important job.
He’d be almost heroic if he wasn’t a treasonous bastard.
I would have interpreted that as Libby not remembering stupid recommendations. Good to know it’s just a sign of bad memory.
mod note:
Folks, let’s drop the discussion of Year of Iran … Marcy gets to chose her own language.
If you have any questions see Christy’s comment at #10.
Good gravy. I can’t wait until Fitz vivisections “The Year of Iran.” Just wish he could do it in front of the camera for posting on YouTube.
Really, is it just me or is Hannah really, REALLY trying too hard to sell Scooter’s memory deficit? It stinks from here in flyover country.
maunga @ 7
Nor is their first loyalty to Israel. They are demented nihilists whose unworkable ideology has all but destroyed the future of the US and Israel at the same time their criminal plans have savaged the infrastructures of Iraq, Lebanon, and the occupied territories. The average Israeli resents these people as much as do you, perhaps far more than does the average progressive American.
Also, will TYOI be testifying about that grueling and very important business work schedule that involved meeting with Tom Cruise and discussing Scientology? Please please Fitz ask him about how busy he was for tha and those 2 hour lunches with Judy, Judy, Judy…and how he had time for all those pressing phone calls to journalists even on Saturday’s during his Kids B-day party.
Siun @ 55
I chose to log out!
What are the sleeping habits of the jury and other court attendees? Many snorers?
-
Hey raven — bitching about it while the liveblogging is ongoing doesn’t change the fact that Marcy is doing to typing. Let it go. We don’t have the time or the server space for it at the moment. When I said it was Marcy’s choice, I meant it. I believe you’ve made your point, and now you need to let it go. That goes for everyone else as well. I’m sorry it’s irritating for some of you, but there you are — we have limited server resources and we cannot make each and every change that people want the very second they want them made — it just doesn’t work that way.
Such a bad memory, so much to remember in SUCH an Important Job. Teh Liar.
QC- anecodotal reporting to date shows the jury to be quite alert, interested, and asking questions
Christy Hardin Smith @
30
Did anyone read this?
Yep, Hannah hasn’t been coached one little bit has he. *g* Surprised he didn’t show up on crutches.
I spewed with The Year of Iran to describe this toxic human abscess, perfect. Hello! They’re trying to level Iran into shiny glass in the very near future.
Love you Marcy. You help keep us from crying and screaming. Last time I checked you aren’t getting paid for this outstanding job of blogging your way to a Pulitzer.
It cannot be said enough. THE Year of Iran.
I really believe that this is the defense’s star witness, pathetic that that may be. He is stating that Libby was forgetful and busy and that’s what the defense willl rest on.
Fitz will ask him something like “Did Mr. Libby ever forget anything of great importance to him?”,
“Examples?”
“Do you know if the Wilson matter was of great importance to him?”
That’s just for starters and in closing he will point out that Libby never took the stand to even claim that he did not remember this specific conversation.
Besides, if Libby’s memory is so freakin’ bad how can he remember a conversation between him and Russert that didn’t actually happen!?
“war hath no fury like a noncombatant”!!!! Churchill’s daughters served in WWII (as did his son), McCain’s son is in Iraq (and, perhaps, Harry of England will also go). What about Bush’s and Cheney’s kids — not to mention the neocons’ broods — and their significant others? Even if states’-side public service (because of the obvious security/kidnapping risk over there)?????
Jeebus! I sit down to see what’s going on and immediately have a spew moment.!ROTFLMAO! TYOI. Priceless!
What with Cheney, et al, in the OVP being so busy till eight or nine in the night, kind of makes one wonder what George Bush does all day?
I agree with #29 – Libby’s busyness cooks his goose.
I remember testimony that joked that Scooter has ADHD (Addington).
ADHD qualities include selective attention and memory – if its interesting you’re ON it, if boring , tune out. By all respects Scooter was focused on Wilson and would not have tuned any of it out.
Christy Hardin Smith @
30
I Agree. Thought at first Marcy’d made a macro. Maybe some punctuation? A colon? Fits the defense strategy….
Is any besides me curious as to why Libby was picked to hold three jobs?
TYOI is the central front of Libby’s attorneys’ war on Fitz. What a joke!
Love ya Marcy. With your book’s deserved success, this is also TYOV – the Year of Vaster Books.
no complaints here ladies, you’re doing a great job!!!!
Bionic @ 73
Because he was able to forget things.
I think Fitz needs to really tear this guy up on cross *if* he wants to see Scoots take the stand.
BobbyG @ 7:37.
Also known as Anal Glaucoma.
Gosh, high maintenance crowd here today. Guys we’re lucky to even have this venue.
What a bunch of BS. Big Time was only concerned with how to get his pals at Haliburton KBR in there to make sure they were well represented when they started handing out the money from the pallets on the truck.
It might be nice, emptywheel, if commentary was reserved for before and after the transcription. It’s not as if you’re offering jewels of brilliance here, and sticking it in the middle of the the transcription is distracting.
Oh!!! Scooter couldn’t remember shit because he was fighting Al-Quaeda. Hannah urgently wants to know if this was declassified before speaks.
What a bunch of clowns.
The discussion of Libby’s role in postwar planning for Iraq seems counterproductive to me. :)
It may result in “reverse jury nullification” — in other words, they’ll send Scooter to jail just for the sake of punishing someone for that crap.
Libby with assistance from you was helping to determine proper size and role of security forces. Determining the proper composition of governing entity. Governance issue in Iraq, was a particular interest and concern.
TYOI Very important issue for us. [then why did you F it up so badly]
Because it is important to create a new model of what deferred success really means? What misplaced self importance – “Determining the proper composition of governing entity”…
Christy and Siun, I posted directly from Christy’s #30 [Siun, not #10] before reading Siun–the comments are flying today. Excellent job by everyone!
Great work Marcy.
You can call him Beezelbub Mo Fo snake-in-the-grass for all I care.
These people are too horrible for words.
Troll cleanup on Aisle 82. Marcy rocks!
Brian @ 81
Marcy is here precisely because she has the knowledge to provide commentary of what’s going on. Is there any reason your request came packaged with an insult?
ccmask @76
I think any of these clowns would forget their own mother if it was politically expedient to do so. And I mean down to the smallest Ledeen daughter.
So to me being able to forget is not such a unique quality. What was the purpose of having Cheney’s COS be his NSA and shoot! I forget what in Bush’s office.
Was he the gobetween who told the Bush admin what they, the Bush folks, wanted to do? And by that I mean whatever Cheney had determined they should do.
And was he Cheney’s NSA because a smart guy like Cheney didn’t need no steenking NSA anyhoo?
Swopa @ 84
jury villification
I think this line of questioning is ridiculous. Scoots was in a high-paying and demanding job. He would not have been hired (in the real world at least) if he weren’t up to the task of juggling lots of stuff. And we all forget things; but most of us remember what is really important to us. And he remembers what Cheney instructed him to do regarding Wilson. No way he wouldn’t remember the number one obsession in the OVP especially since he was in charge of it! Hope the jury feels the same…
Brian @ 81
As Mrs.K8 would say:
hoo boy!
and from me, (with due respect to server issues):
let loose the firedogs of War!
Is it just me or is this list of VERY important work that scoots was supposed to be doing not normally work that would be associated with a VICE president’s work? At least in theory it would be under the duties of the Pres./State/Defense?
TYOI is making it sound as if the whole war was being run out of the OVP. Aside from Libby and his “bad” memory, this all sounds upside down. Yes, we are living in upside down world. This just shows that in spades.
I would like to see this broadcast into everyone’s living room at 6:00.
McDonalds has a limited menu.
Scooter can work a counter.
“The Year of Iran On certain things Scooter had an awful memory.
The Year of Iran Times too many to count, I’d come into Scooter in the morning, I’d give my views, give an analysis, show up 6 hours later that evening, have Scooter repeat back to me the recommendations I told him that morning. It was very striking.
C WOuld you call that to his attention.
The Year of Iran I did once, in exasperation, but that was Mr Libby.”
Okay, Mr. 2007 Year of Iran, let me get this straight about you and Libby. By way of analogy, if you were like Luke Wilson’s character, Joe Bowers, in Idiocracy, would Libby, be more like President Camacho, the defense attorney Frito or the Costco greeter?
Is the jury buying this?
Everybody should lay off Marcy and heed what Christy had to say. If you don’t like what Marcy (bless her fast little fingers) has to say then why not just hi on over to RedState dot Com or Little Green Footballs and let the folks here discuss the relevant issues!
Back when I was a lowly intern at State, in the early Reagan days, remembering what was classified and how to handle it was a pretty big deal.
My, how things apparently change.
It’s the “Too important for my shirt!” defense!!
I was following the line of questioning for the prosecution’s witnesses, even the cross. I am just plain confused as to what is going on here with the witnesses for the defense. Yeah, faulty memory and I didn’t leak to all these other reporters…. But still, big-picture-wise, this is all a very confusing tactic to me.
I love the running commentary.
IMO it’s what is missing from the MSM. They don’t keep us abreast of who the players are and what they advocate. It might help the average Joe to understand the machinations that this Admin has used to promote their heinous plots.
Keep it up Marcie. You’re great!
Becoming clear that the reason Bushie keeps saying “I’m the Decider” has nothing to do with Exec v Congress. And everything to do with plaintively trying to establish his manhood when Chee-knee’s running everything.
Marcy you rock. Bought your book, read your book, loved your book. Love your analysis and live blogging here even more. You can call TYOI any darn thing you want. And any whiners out there, how about antying up into the FDL donation basket at the end of the post.
Jane Hamsher @
88
I love the commentary. It gives a flavor to what is going on. Brian, if you don’t like the commentary, just skip to the next bloggy part. Many of us would not want Marcy to eliminate it. Thanks.
swopa you owe me a new keyboard for that “reverse jury nullification” quip. Egad! Coffee everywhere….
RevDeb @
93
At one point I was up in the courtroom and Hannah was talking about how he would tell Scooter something in the morning and by the end of the day Scooter would tell it back to him without remembering when it came from. Scooter was smiling and chuckling affably at this portrait of his good-natured, forgetful self.
Denial or beta blockers? I’m torn.
Drat! It’s bad enough they expect me to show up on time, now they want me to work!
BRB.
RevDeb @ 93
Yes it almost sounds like Cheney’s office was running the country. Almost as though Cheney were the decider. I must be having some kind of memory lapse like Scoots and Judy.
Would the critics in the troll gallery please show more intelligence and less ass?
TIA.
-
I would like to address the critics- Until you get a press pass and fly to DC and spend your days in the courthouse and go thru all the troubles to get this out there on the web- Keep your complaints to yourself.
Ed*ard Teller @ 57…… In which case let’s see 242, 338 et al applied of Israel’s own free will, hein?
I await Fitz to TYI with bayed breath. ‘TYI’ as a title for this representative of the Gang of Madmen is particularly piquant for me since I am in interviews for a V highly-paid job in Abu Dhabi, which an Iranian demolition of oil installations would kibosh!
Gang, when I said let it go — I meant it. From all sides. Clogging up the thread slinging insults is not my preferred choice for bandwidth usage. Thanks.
Is Cline suggesting that Scooter move to Iran, or that Hannah move there?
DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS!
Fresh liveblog thread, up and running.
TYOI is full of … If things were happening that fast, and were so important, why were they spending time trying to cover their lies and asses instead of shoveling the pile they created.
Looks as if the memory defense is getting in- at closing defense can say that there was no motive for scoots to intentionally lie- the Plame stuff had been well circulated by others before he said anything about it- and jury will remember the cute little memory lapses described here. That seems to be the whole plan.
Jane @ 106
When I read that I thought it was a very skillful dig. As in Scoots thought he was so clever but in reality was simply taking the credit for his underlings’ good work.
I am sure many of us have had bosses like that and wouldn’t have shared Scoots’ chuckles at remembering.
I wonder if it won’t come back to bite Scooter on the ass with the jury. Not that I biased on anything (*g*) but it wouldn’t make me like Libby more to hear he did this.
I have no doubt the Cheney govt classifies many lies. AQ hates the Shiites. The idea that Iran would harbor AQ is bat-turd crazy, just as the idea that Iran would be giving armaments to the Sunnis in Iraq is insane. These guys are nuckin’ futz.
I just realized that Charles Manson should be released from prison immediately. Since there are still millions of Americans alive that HE DIDN”T KILL, he obviously didn’t kill anybody else!
Seems like the Scooter defense to me!
I’m with Swopa, I think this may backfire. There’s tremendous public hunger for a scalp over Iraq, and Hannah is spending hours tying Libby to this mess. I guess they have no choice, if they’re going to prove Libby was a busy little guy they’ve got to do this, but I’m also sensing a tremendous arrogance — that they simply don’t understand that the War On Terra bs makes them sound Oh So Terribly Important, rather than warmongering morons.
Hi, I’m late for the party. Can anyone tell me — is there lots of snow in DC this morning? Was it a problem getting into the courthouse?
I live about 30 miles down the road. Schools are closed and my daughter and I have had a wonderful day already — just snoozing… We have only about 1/2 inch of snow, but the prognosticators are saying we’re going to have lots ice tonight and tomorrow.
rwcole @ 117
I think that is probably the best articulation of what the defense is that I have heard.
Bionic @ 73
no govt ties or xpertise here… but simple observation hints broadly that this crazy administration, even while incessantly preaching “less govt”, has had a nasty habit of growing itself like a cancer on the country.
e.g., bigtime’s duplicate intelligence service to bypass the existing one, eh?
Pach, you there? What would that signify, besides some sorta ultra-megalomania & good old fashioned greed???
BobbyG @ 11
Maybe this was a mistranscription, but I thought Hannah said that at the end of theLibby could recite the six things Hannah had told him masaccio @ 54
Does this mean Scoots would have to ask TYOI to repeat the recommendations at the end of the say, or that before he left the office TYOI would have to check to make sure Scoots still remembered the six recommendations (”Okay, Dad, I’m leaving now, do you remember my name and my telephone number?”).
All this talk about Iran – Hannah is detailing the actual motive for neutralizing Plame, right?
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Yada yada yada . . . . WE GET IT!!! Poor Scooter was a busy guy. WE GET IT!!!
With all of his regime toppling and nation building, it’s AMAZING how the poor guy found the time to out a CIA agent and fabricate stories to discredit her politically opposed husband. The guy is DEFINITELY a multi-tasker!
Ed*ard Teller @ 84
More interesting to me was determining “the loyalty of Iraqi leaders.” Loyalty to WHOM?
Omigod I’m mortified that commenters are complaining about liveblogger prerogatives on style and notation. I can only guess that people making comments like that just reflexively think that a.) everybody in the world is “the help,” or b.) they themselves and their preferences and notions of stylistic bugaboos are, by natural law (IANAL) or something, correct. Or some combination of the two.
I took my mortified self just now to Amazon and bought Anatomy of Deceit to make up in a small way for the pettiness.
Stop the pettiness, folks. Eyes on the prize. Look past the trees for the forest. Liveblogging is the antidote to the MSM parroting or accepting the word of officials who have their hands on the tiller of an evi foreign policy. Big picture thinking is what’s called for. Especailly as it is ever so likely that this is, indeed, the Year of Iran.
Christy at 30 – thanks.
Marcy, do not change anything in the way you’re blogging this. I may be confused about where this trial is going, but just imagine where I’d (we’d) be without your work.
Thank you, thank you, thank you.
(There’s something I need to do by April 15th, but for the life of me, I just can’t remember…oh, it’ll come to me).
I am only able to check in occasionally but it strikes me that Marcy is doing a yeoman’s job of transcribing and her ‘commentary’ inside or outside of the transcription provides appreciated levity and context.
Christy, as a lawyer … why is Hannah able to testify wrt Libby’s ‘typical day’ – I would think that seeing as how his job is (allegedly) full time, he wouldn’t be able to keep close tabs on Libby and, therefore, would constitute hearsay – no?
You know, let’s say you are a doctor and you have beginning stages of altzheimers but you keep practicing…and let’s say you forget something really important…and it results in damage to someone, that would be called malpractice…correct??? I just don’t understand how this is going to make it “okay” that he forgot…I mean I understand that it means he didn’t “intentionally lie” but at the same time it makes him “incompetent” in his job.
CJ at 132 — If he were testifying about typical statements that sort of thing, then it would certainly be hearsay, but testifying about habit or custom in terms of actions or items covered is close to the line, but not over, depending on how they ask the question and how it is answered.
I think Walton is allowing some of this in out of deference to the need for the defense to present their case, but that will only go so much further, I would suspect, before he reins it in a bit.
Why are they giving this clown a soap box for his contempory opinions on Iran? What does this have to do with Libby’s perjury in 2003? His purpose is to create the impression that Libby was overworked, doing the job of two men in a normal VP’s office. And this VP has him further sticking his nose in places it doesn’t belong, like the on-the-ground details and tactics in a war zone. We get the picture; Libby was overburdened and had a bad memory. Not a good commentary on Cheney’s judgement IMHO.
Re: #81 & a bunch-a ultra-obsessive critics, may I hazard a suggestion.
PLEASE listen to Christy’s warnings, folks! IF you want a decent “play-by-play” from Marcy, or any other in her place, it is NOT helpful at ALL to bombard the toobz with an ongoing stream of suggestions while she’s concentrating on testimony & typing. All you do is distract and detract from the post, and risk clogging the toobz.
I respectfully suggest everyone who has hints on how to tweak anything about presentation make their own private list of ideas, keep them handy but do NOT send them to FDL until the day’s testimony is done. Then, maybe mods would be so kind as to put up a special thread just for suggestions.
In the meantime, let’s heed Christy’s warnings, and PLEASE quit bugging Marcy! CAPICE?!?!
apologies for jumping in, Redd.
Well I’m refreshing every 15 minutes or so, so I admit I’m a beneficiary of this liveblogging, even while I take potshots (or “whine,” as the case may be.)
I remember in the 90’s, Jerry Falwell and some posters on Free Republic used to peddle conspiracy theories to the effect that President Clinton was responsible for many murders, was a foreign agent, etc. No doubt, they were just as sincere as many here. But they failed to cognize the possibility that perhaps their opponents were just wrong, and not evil.
And with that I shall recede into the background again…
I actually do appreciate this effort, even though I got temporarily piqued.
With regard to Iran harboring terrorists, here’s some of the heavily redacted NY Times story on that by Flynt Leverett and Hillary Mann:
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2….._1222.html
In December 2001, xxxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx x Tehran to keep Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, the brutal pro-Al Qaeda warlord, from returning to Afghanistan to lead jihadist resistance there. xxxxx xxxxxxx so long as the Bush administration did not criticize it for harboring terrorists. But, in his January 2002 State of the Union address, President Bush did just that in labeling Iran part of the “axis of evil.” Unsurprisingly, Mr. Hekmatyar managed to leave Iran in short order after the speech. xxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxx the Islamic Republic could not be seen to be harboring terrorists.
In other words, Iran was holding onto terrorists for safe-keeping at the request of the U.S.
oops. well i guess i killed that golden goose… *g*
{{{{{{Marcy! Christy! Mods!}}}}}}
hmmmmmmm stealing other people’s ideas and spitting them back out as your own, another ‘fine’ quality of scooter libbey
“The Year of Iran On certain things Scooter had an awful memory.
The Year of Iran Times too many to count, I’d come into Scooter in the morning, I’d give my views, give an analysis, show up 6 hours later that evening, have Scooter repeat back to me the recommendations I told him that morning. It was very striking.
C WOuld you call that to his attention.
The Year of Iran I did once, in exasperation, but that was Mr Libby.”
and has anyone else noticed that sometimes he says ’scooter’ and other times ‘mr.libby’?
Hi Jane!
{{{{{{HUGS}}}}}}
RevDeb @
93
Guess that’s what he thought. Scary isn’t it?
WASHINGTON (CNN) — The former third-ranking official at the CIA, Kyle “Dusty” Foggo, is expected to be indicted in San Diego Tuesday in an ongoing investigation into public corruption and defense contracts, according to two sources familiar with the case.
Federal prosecutors in San Diego plan to announce that Foggo will be indicted in connection with an inquiry into the awarding of secret Pentagon contracts, the sources said.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 30
Those that do not care for the live blogging at FDL can also go where they LIKE the style of live blogging. All folks at FDL are and have done an outstanding job of blogging this trial and, in my opinion, deserve to use any expressions and descriptions they desire.
Agreed: The Year of Iran should hang like a five-hundred kilo grindstone around Hannah’s breathing tube. Great work, Marcy.
Neocon preemptive invasion ala Hitler gets the living model treatment with all cortical bells and whistles. Get ready for an avalanche of slow learners rewarding Bush with single digit popularity.
.
Siun @ 55
I’m EPU’d, but Marcy, you are doing a marvelous job, and you can call him any damn thing you want, as far as I’m concerned.
-S
Rove and Cheney orchestrated this entire charade from the outset.
They knew they were outing a CIA agent – and attempted to ensure that no single individual would be held responsible by using three or four to release the information to multiple agents (reporters) all at the same time. Rove wanted to create the illusion that the information was “in the public domain” – therefore not a crime to reveal it.
It failed to work, Karl. You and Cheney are doing time.
In legal terms, this is what’s known as a CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT TREASON DURING A TIME OF WAR.
Now you can see why Ari was so freaked out that he went underground. Ari knows EVERYTHING. Put his lying ass back on the stand and ask him about his 9/11 foreknowledge. Let’s reveal the ENTIRE CONSPIRACY.
# 147
I agree.!! Today is not the day, but I hope soon we are allowed to ask those obvious 9/11 questions. I mean, it is so obvious.
But today, I just thank God for FDL. from the bottom of my 71 yr. old heart.
Stroke by stroke, FDL is opening doors for us, and actually saving our beautiful America.
I hope I live to see America the Beautiful again.
JF @ 28
Meet in Bed?
I believer the expression is, “Can’t keep their Shiite straight”
Swopa@
83
i was going to comment yesterday, but couldn’t get past lurking, you all are phenomenal, i hate to add my dumbness. But i totally agree with the article you wrote yesterday. There is a huge intriguing story here with the witnesses squirming in their seats. Someday it will make a fantastic documentary if the truth can ever be patched together. And now they have another excuse for the failure in Iraq–the intel, the after attack planning, lack of knowledge of history– all can be blamed on Scooter’s bad memory. Btw, how many jurors does it take to convict him?
ccmask @
16
Yes…but it would be classified in terms of actual role. Thus if someone was identified broadly as a CIA employee they might allow that to be declassified, as a fait accompli, but hold tightly to the other details.
BTW has anyone ever bothered to actually see if there is documentation that Plame’s employment was DECLASSIFIED!
There should be a record that it WAS!
*xyz @
39
Notice that Hannah’s example didn’t show that Libby actually forgot the INFORMATION he was told…in fact he recalled point-by-point the information back to Hannah. Libby digested it, and then recapitulated it in detail later. What he “forgot” was simply who, of several sources told him.
While one might think that this would support Libby’s case it actually suggests the opposite. Libby would not have thought those “talking points” were surprising. He recalled the content in detail. In the Russert assertion he claimed he “forgot” the information. And he created a completely erroneous source and scenario. Hannah never said that Libby EVER did that.
If he had, perhaps shown something that he said “The President ordered this” when perhaps it was a suggestion from Bob Novak…well that would have been equivalent to his “the VP told me…but I thought it was Russert” scenario.
And even more we have to recall that the information he supposedly “forgot” he “learned” almost a month before, and THEN, several times just prior to the “Russert assertion” he had IN FACT REPEATED.
He remembered about Plame throughout this period of a month or so…didn’t forget…or perhaps had his memory repeatedly REFRESHED with documents and conversations that haven’t been found or reported yet. So he told others in that June-early July period before he met with Russert…and then, “brain flatulence” just after the WILSON OP-ED????
Then he “hears for the first time” (falsely) with Russert. And that same day he somehows forgets that Russert really didn’t tell him…and tells Rove that he did, tells the VP that he did, tells Fleisher (about what he didn’t apparently learn from Russert) and “recalls” then tells Cooper (all the reporters know it).
Oh…and he tells Fleischer to tell “all the reporters who already know” to keep that information “hush hush on the QT”?!
Huh?
If the reporters “all know” then why does he go on a fit of “leaks” like an incontinent male dog in a new neighborhood?
Where’s the rationale in telling Mitchell, but then not wanting to get Russert in trouble? All the reporters knew, after all.
And then he has a “perfect memory” of Russert telling him…down to very precise details…until he finds that “note”. And then suddenly he has very precise memories of Chney’s expressions and tics, of his own feelings that the information wasn’t conveyed as if it was classified, and all sorts of other details about that phone discussion.
Christy-#30- Thank you- well put. Much nicer than I might have said it.
Hi, Marcy!
And to think, based on TOYI’s description of how busy, busy, busy the OVP was during the period in which they were outing a covert non-official cover CIA agent in 2003, it makes one wonder why the Bush administration only held ONE cabinet-level counter-terrorism Principal’s meeting before 9/11 (one week before the attacks in 2001) to address the al Qaeda threat.
With all the warnings during the summer of 2001 about an impending domestic U.S.A. terrorist attack with “Bin Laden Determined to Strike Inside the United States,” the Bush administration could only muster up enough interest to hold this one, solitary counter-terrorism Principal’s meeting, a meeting to which the top counter-terrorism chief, Richard Clarke, was not even invited.
Incredible. Criminal. Incompetent. Traitorous.
Hannah perjured himself.
He should be arrested.
He knows full well that Libby has a terrific memory and is otherwise intellectually qualified to have been Chief of Staff to the second most powerful man in the USA. He’s a liar.
My question is; why didn’t Fitzgerald call Cheney as a hostile witness and have him, among many other things, explain (amongst a hundred other things) why he hired an obviously brain-dead idiot like Libby (instead of Hannah who has such a grasp of everything?) to be his Chief-of-Staff and handle so many very important affairs?
How could he trust Libby to remember Plame’s identity and his (Cheney’s) explicite instructions concerning Plame amidst the plethora of other important issues consuming him?
Fortunately, it appears from the juror’s questions, that they are not as stupid as Libby; is being painted by his defense.