Comments on: Hey! Come on! Put Your Punk on the Stand http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/13/hey-come-on-put-your-punk-on-the-stand-2/ Firedoglake weblog Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:59:14 -0600 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: idahojim http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/13/hey-come-on-put-your-punk-on-the-stand-2/#comment-504812 idahojim Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:44:09 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/13/hey-come-on-put-your-punk-on-the-stand-2/#comment-504812 <p>yea,its amazeing how so many of these so called pnks that are found guilty are later found to be innocent and were only found guilty in the first place becouse of the flat out lies that came from the prosicuting punks.</p> yea,its amazeing how so many of these so called pnks that are found guilty are later found to be innocent and were only found guilty in the first place becouse of the flat out lies that came from the prosicuting punks.

]]> By: leow http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/13/hey-come-on-put-your-punk-on-the-stand-2/#comment-504787 leow Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:11:37 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/13/hey-come-on-put-your-punk-on-the-stand-2/#comment-504787 <p><a href="#comment-503938"><em>Lindy @<br /> 58 </em></a></p> <blockquote><p><a href="#comment-503899"><em>Christy Hardin Smith @<br /> 30 </em></a></p> <blockquote><p>leow at 29 — Take a peek at Larry Johnson’s review of the book, and see if your opinion changes. Apparently, Larry says that the author has some substantial credibility issues — that larry knows about from personal experience with the man. Just FYI.</p></blockquote> <p><a href="http://noquarter.typepad.com/my_weblog/2006/12/peter_lances_fl.html">Link to that review by Larry Johnson</a></p></blockquote> <p>Thank you. I read Larry Johnson’s comments earlier via a link on Peter Lance’s web site. PL’s web site has his response to LJ, FYI:</p> <p><a href="http://www.peterlance.com">http://www.peterlance.com</a></p> Lindy @
58

Christy Hardin Smith @
30

leow at 29 — Take a peek at Larry Johnson’s review of the book, and see if your opinion changes. Apparently, Larry says that the author has some substantial credibility issues — that larry knows about from personal experience with the man. Just FYI.

Link to that review by Larry Johnson

Thank you. I read Larry Johnson’s comments earlier via a link on Peter Lance’s web site. PL’s web site has his response to LJ, FYI:

http://www.peterlance.com

]]> By: Phoenix Woman http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/13/hey-come-on-put-your-punk-on-the-stand-2/#comment-504333 Phoenix Woman Wed, 14 Feb 2007 02:38:41 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/13/hey-come-on-put-your-punk-on-the-stand-2/#comment-504333 <p><a href="#comment-503995"><em>David Ehrenstein @ 98 </em></a></p> <blockquote><p>Fitz is indeed methodical — as well he should be. He was investigating Plame when — bang! — Irving lies to the grand jury. Therefore this trial sets up the situation and all the players in line for future proceedings.</p> <p>In all the early stages the press was blathering about Rove. And since Fitz didn’t indict Rove it was all considered a failure. Now it’s clear that his real target is Cheney.</p></blockquote> <p>Yupper, and Cheney is up against it.</p> <p>See, Rove’s advantage over Cheney is that Rove has two guys he can deal to Fitz whose scalps are worth more than Rove’s: Cheney and Dim Son himself. Cheney only can sell out Dim Son — and that will never be allowed to happen.</p> David Ehrenstein @ 98

Fitz is indeed methodical — as well he should be. He was investigating Plame when — bang! — Irving lies to the grand jury. Therefore this trial sets up the situation and all the players in line for future proceedings.

In all the early stages the press was blathering about Rove. And since Fitz didn’t indict Rove it was all considered a failure. Now it’s clear that his real target is Cheney.

Yupper, and Cheney is up against it.

See, Rove’s advantage over Cheney is that Rove has two guys he can deal to Fitz whose scalps are worth more than Rove’s: Cheney and Dim Son himself. Cheney only can sell out Dim Son — and that will never be allowed to happen.

]]> By: Pete http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/13/hey-come-on-put-your-punk-on-the-stand-2/#comment-504292 Pete Wed, 14 Feb 2007 02:02:57 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/13/hey-come-on-put-your-punk-on-the-stand-2/#comment-504292 <p>Put your chickenhawks on the stand!</p> Put your chickenhawks on the stand!

]]> By: SharonRB http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/13/hey-come-on-put-your-punk-on-the-stand-2/#comment-504279 SharonRB Wed, 14 Feb 2007 01:58:24 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/13/hey-come-on-put-your-punk-on-the-stand-2/#comment-504279 <p><a href="#comment-504231"><em>Pectopah @ 133</em></a></p> <blockquote><p>Jim,</p> <p>Greetings from MI-8 and Lake Orion! Thanks for running. Because of you, I am no longer on the sidelines, and waiting to support you again in ‘08.</p></blockquote> <p>I hope he runs again, too. Maybe the DCCC will help this time. They’re targeting Michigan next time around — the 9th for sure (hopefully Nancy will run again) and possibly the 7th and 8th (and the 11th?).</p> Pectopah @ 133

Jim,

Greetings from MI-8 and Lake Orion! Thanks for running. Because of you, I am no longer on the sidelines, and waiting to support you again in ‘08.

I hope he runs again, too. Maybe the DCCC will help this time. They’re targeting Michigan next time around — the 9th for sure (hopefully Nancy will run again) and possibly the 7th and 8th (and the 11th?).

]]> By: Pectopah http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/13/hey-come-on-put-your-punk-on-the-stand-2/#comment-504231 Pectopah Wed, 14 Feb 2007 01:23:04 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/13/hey-come-on-put-your-punk-on-the-stand-2/#comment-504231 <p>Jim,</p> <p>Greetings from MI-8 and Lake Orion! Thanks for running. Because of you, I am no longer on the sidelines, and waiting to support you again in ‘08.</p> Jim,

Greetings from MI-8 and Lake Orion! Thanks for running. Because of you, I am no longer on the sidelines, and waiting to support you again in ‘08.

]]> By: jo6pac http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/13/hey-come-on-put-your-punk-on-the-stand-2/#comment-504176 jo6pac Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:47:43 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/13/hey-come-on-put-your-punk-on-the-stand-2/#comment-504176 <p>Tejanarusa</p> <p>Thanks for Col. Lang</p> <p>Jo6pac</p> Tejanarusa

Thanks for Col. Lang

Jo6pac

]]> By: Crazy Horse http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/13/hey-come-on-put-your-punk-on-the-stand-2/#comment-504169 Crazy Horse Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:43:37 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/13/hey-come-on-put-your-punk-on-the-stand-2/#comment-504169 <p>wasn’t referring to the redactions. very strange the way the case kept getting moved around various judges, always coming back to him within days. he wouldn’t let her suit go forward.</p> wasn’t referring to the redactions. very strange the way the case kept getting moved around various judges, always coming back to him within days. he wouldn’t let her suit go forward.

]]> By: cinnamonape http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/13/hey-come-on-put-your-punk-on-the-stand-2/#comment-504163 cinnamonape Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:37:28 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/13/hey-come-on-put-your-punk-on-the-stand-2/#comment-504163 <p><a href="#comment-504065"><em>Crazy Horse @<br /> 121 </em></a></p> <blockquote><p>I hope so, legaleze, because he (or they) sure seem to have shafted Ms. Edmonds.</p></blockquote> <p>Maybe Walton redacted his statement because he’s a FISA judge? The article does state that about 1% of all Federal judges ask for total redaction. What is the reason for that? What reasons are given for any redactions? </p> <p>Why would redactions alone (since they appear to be legal in many cases…many judges are allowed redactions it seems) indicate that Walton is doing something illegal or unethical.</p> Crazy Horse @
121

I hope so, legaleze, because he (or they) sure seem to have shafted Ms. Edmonds.

Maybe Walton redacted his statement because he’s a FISA judge? The article does state that about 1% of all Federal judges ask for total redaction. What is the reason for that? What reasons are given for any redactions?

Why would redactions alone (since they appear to be legal in many cases…many judges are allowed redactions it seems) indicate that Walton is doing something illegal or unethical.

]]> By: Stymie http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/13/hey-come-on-put-your-punk-on-the-stand-2/#comment-504141 Stymie Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:25:12 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/13/hey-come-on-put-your-punk-on-the-stand-2/#comment-504141 <p>Yeah, this is all building up to the real case against the VP. But first I’m waiting for the Enron indictments against Bush & Co. to be handed up……. but unfortunately we might just have to wait until Howard Dean gets into office for that.</p> Yeah, this is all building up to the real case against the VP. But first I’m waiting for the Enron indictments against Bush & Co. to be handed up……. but unfortunately we might just have to wait until Howard Dean gets into office for that.

]]>