
[We are thrilled to welcome Ned Lamont to FDL for a discussion with us today. As with all Blue America chats, please keep the discussion polite and on topic. Any off-topic discussions should be moved to the prior thread. Thank you -- and please join us in welcoming Ned! -- CHS]
The first time I met Ned Lamont it was February 7, 2006... just one year ago! It feels like many more than that, somehow, and I'm sure it does for Ned, too. What that guy has been through...(and I'm not even talking about the $20 million).
We talked on the phone on the one year anniversary of our first meeting. Since then, he has led a veritable campaign to put forward a progressive agenda that is still being ignored Inside the Beltway. When we spoke Wednesday he was doing the same thing -- albeit at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government, instead of on the national stage. It seems like just yesterday that we watched him do the unthinkable: deny a longtime incumbent renomination to his U.S. Senate seat.
I asked him if he thought he even had a chance when we first met.
"I didn't care if it was a long shot," he told me. "It started as quixotic and after a while it was... possible. I always felt it was important to raise the issues we talked about."
Ned sounded as impassioned last week as he did last year in the middle of his high profile battle against what many of us saw -- and still see -- as Evil incarnate, Holy Joe Lieberman, and all that is wrong with a rotten and corrupt Inside-the-Beltway political class.
Ned in February 2006 was talking to me about an unjustifiable war and about the importance of creating good paying jobs for our people instead of shipping them overseas and about health care, privacy and getting people involved in self-government. He talked to be about many of the same issues on the phone and he's talking about them to students at Harvard this semester.
When Ned started out he was a concerned citizen who was pissed off about an intrusive government butting into everything from Terri Schiavo medical decisions to illegal eavesdropping on random Americans. His campaign may not have dislodged Lieberman from office -- although it certainly dislodged him from respectability and probably from sanity -- but it brought Ned's concerns and issues to the foreground.
Before Ned's campaign, the corporate media and the Beltway Insiders of both parties felt they could afford to ignore the Bush Regime's overstepping. People barely remember those days now.
"By the end of the campaign even Lieberman was talking about starting to bring troops home in by the end of the year! Since then we've had the bipartisan Baker Commission saying we need a surge in diplomacy, not in troop levels; and we've had a score of generals saying the same thing and the American people have spoken in polls and, as voters, at the November polls."
He seems glad that the arguments are out there -- and even won -- but frustrated that Bush and Cheney seem as impervious to the will of the Congress and to the will of the people as they have been to Reality itself.
In the end, a series of nods and winks from Bush, Cheney and Rove swung Lieberman's natural constituency -- Republicans -- behind him. He ran as someone above the political parties, as neither a Democrat nor a Republican. As corporate money poured into his campaign from traditionally Republican sources, Lieberman was able to define Ned to low information voters who never bother with primaries. Ned went from being the feisty independent outsider to being the defender of one of the big political parties while Lieberman painted himself as someone unconnected to...his essential self.
Ned's focus, however is towards the future.
His Harvard seminar, "Political Entrepreneurship and the Changing Political Landscape" is about how issues get framed by the old and new media. He has guests lecturers from every side of the issues including bloggers like Matt Stoller and David Sirota. He wouldn't take my bait and declare any interest in running against Rep. Chris Shays, a fake moderate who just yesterday endorsed right wing warmonger John McCain -- although he didn't give me a Shermanesque statement either.
"I want to stay involved, but on a policy level," he said. "I'm talking about setting up a Connecticut policy institute to deal with statewide issues like healthcare reform. Candidates seem to be selling hope and soap."
He seems sure there are many ways for him to make contributions to our country without having to run for office.
Login Here
Spotlight



Support this site!
Keep
up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search


RSS/XML Feed
Mr. Lamont!
NED !!
Thank you Ned Lamont, for your efforts, your commitment, and for being here today.
My topic is fundraising. There were voters who could not make sense of the fact that your campaign was largely self-funded. They didn’t approve of it, but couldn’t quite tell me why.
It seemed like voters who couldn’t take the time to know you wanted to see that you needed, and received, large material support from outside. External funding may serve as a kind of endorsement in their eyes.
Folks like us lean the other way, knowing the number of smaller individual donations constitute a ringing endorsement, but that didn’t ring didn’t resonate with these voters.
I thought I’d read that you were involved in fundraising at some level before throwing your own hat into the ring. As an entrepeneur you probably have experience raising capital to support a startup.
Is the exercise of fundraising itself is form of communication that has a payoff beyond the funds received?
I think that however the self-funding issue played out last time, your streamlined ‘pitch’ and personal commitment to that simple formula will be remembered, and work for you with low information voters next time.
ROOTZ!
Mr. Lamont, welcome and thank you so very much for challenging Joe Liebermann. Your campaign, your integrity, your hard work and your challenge woke the rest of the country up.
Ned!
I have been a Nedhead for over a year…from the moment I heard rumors that you might oppose Holy Joe Lieberman. THANK YOU for having the courage to stand up to that gas bag. We were with you all the way…and then some!
Which brings me to my question. I can’t let go of my anger at the way CT Dems were treated by DC Dems in your fight against Lieberman. As most will attest, I am still hostile to anyone who did not stand up with us (versus hide in the shadows and try not to be asked about their support for you) and usually get troll ratings because I don’t kiss the feet of Schumer, Hillary, Bill (both of whom I previously adored!), Barack, Holy Harold Ford and the rest of that gang.
So tell me…how have you gotten beyond it? Where can I go to focus my energy against the DC Dem establishment and their lack of willingness to face facts in Iraq (and Iran!)
Oh, by the way, my husband and I still have our Ned Lamont bumper stickers on our cars (right next to the “Anybody but Bush” stickers) and will soon be moving to Michigan and Arizona. As we drive ‘cross country, we plan on wearing your name proudly until those stickers shrivel up and drop off the back bumpers.
Welcome Ned — your campaign was such an inspiration, so energizing, and I thank you for it. We’re thrilled to have you chatting here at FDL today.
Welcome to our hang out, Ned. Some of us spent a lot of time in yours last summer and would do so again in a heartbeat!
Hello everybody, Ned here. It’s been a while since I have done this but let’s rock. Hi Jane and Christy.
Mr. Lamont:
What lessons did you learn on the campaign trail that you can share with us? And to follow up that question, was it worth the lessons learned?
Mr. Lamont, thank you so much for trying to end Joe Lieberman’s disgraceful impersonation of a US Senator. You gave very generously of your time and your own resources and we will not forget.
Like everyone else, I greatly appreciated your courageous stance on the occupation of Iraq and the $267,000,000 it costs us per day. I deeply appreciated your wise comments that this stupendous error only made Iran and Russia more dominant in the Middle East. I was never more impressed with you, however, than when you rejected the notion that “earmarks” are simply part and parcel of US government, during one of your televised debates. All Americans depend on their elected officials to be fair.
I hope you understand how very important you still are to the Democrats. You may have
lost an election, but a lot of the low information voters will listen to you wrt
their choice of a Democratic Presidential candidate.
Ned,
For what it’s worth, I was in Rome during your primary. I woke up early to read The Times online, and the computer was in an open area near the registration desk and cafe. When I let out a big WooHoo!, my daughter died of embarrassment. But, everyone wanted to know what was going on. As I was explaining, people from all over the world were gathering around and translating the news. Everyone was so happy!
Go for it again.
Ned-
First, welcome! It’s great to have you here.
As scarecrow’s post below makes clear, I hope you are aware of both your impact on the 2006 elections and how much we all appreciate what you did. Even if you didn’t win, you changed the political landscape. It will never be the same.
It’s my fervent hope you stay involved. Perhaps another run for office?
Ned, I do want to thank you publicly for the outstanding access you’ve given us bloggers to your campaign. It was (and continues to be) an education and an inspiration to all of us.
I appreciate what you’ve done to help create this environment of citizen participation in the political process. You’ve always made us feel welcomed and valued. Thank you.
Thank you Ned .. it was an honor to work with your team last summer!
I was poking through old emails the other day, and came across one written on Feb 2, 2006. It said (paraphrased) “Hey, did you know Joe might have a primary challenger? Ned Lamont wants to know how much support he’d have if he runs. I signed up, though I don’t know the first thing about the guy. Hell, I’d take Zippy the Chimp over Joe at this point.”
It started that way, anyone but Joe. But it took ONE time seeing you in person before I was hooked. I’d have worked by butt off to get Lieberman out of office, no matter the candidate. But thank you so much for being who you are, kind, decent, committed, passionate. It was a pleasure to work FOR someone. And I’d do it again in a second.
We’re still on the bus, Ned. Just give us our next destination, and off we’ll go.
Hello Ned,
Right to the point, have you considered challenging Chris Shays in 2008?
Welcome, Ned Lamont. I’m so glad to be able to tell you how very much I appreciate your stepping up to the plate and representing those of us without a voice.
You changed the entire tenor of the various campaigns in other states too. That was *so* needed and all the credit goes to you and your willingness to speak up and speak out.
Thank you.
Ned:
Just when the rest of the world began to despair that, other the Russ Feingold, no one in American politics dared to speak honestly, unguardedly, critically and ethically…you appeared and changed all the parameters of the political landscape.
You won, even though you lost, Ned. Every democratic candidate for President sounds like you did months ago. But, back then, none of them did.
Thanks for your courage and dedication.
Short question, Do you think that Joe Lieberman and the DLC have forsworn their American citizenship for that of corporations and/or Israel?
Welcome, Ned…
I ran for office myself last cycle (NYS Senate) and lost. I’ve been asked by lots of people if I am going to run again…I’ll turn around and ask you the same question.
Up for another try?
Rock The Boat!
Something I made before the primary. Just to get us all back in the mood.
Hello again Ned. I was pleased to see you at the Connecticut rally for Dodd a few weeks ago. Will you be endorsing his campaign for the presidency?
Mr. Lamont,
Good luck with your Connecticut policy institute. Sounds like this is becoming more important all the time.
How do you feel about the movment to draft Al Gore for the 2008 presidential race?
Ned, just so you know, the questions may come flying fast and furious because you have a lot of fans here — but get to the ones that you can and enjoy the conversation. I’m sure everyone will be patient as you get through the deluge of questions. :)
Dear Sha- don’t get mad, get even. I suppose that the national dems had alot of other races which could flip democrat so that was their priority. Still, I got into this race, in part, because the politicians on both sides of the aisle were not standing up and challenging the status quo, so we get back up and keep challenging.
I finally found a WiFi connection near the convention I’m speaking at. Thanks for coming on Ned!
Hello Mr. Lamont. I’m a friend of Ken Guckert and a huge supporter - met you at numerous events, canvassed and called for your campaign before the primary and every weekend after Labor Day, (and was in Newtown with other Lamont supporters on Labor Day).
I wanted to personally thank you for going up against Lieberman. I saw you work your heart out representing those of us who supported you - getting out the word on your stand against the war but also sharing your ideas for improving education, focusing on the environment, etc. in Connecticut. I can’t tell you how appreciative I am that you sacrificed so much and put yourself out there for what you believed in.
I’m glad to see you are still actively involved in the public policy debate and I hope you will consider running for office some time in the future.
Ned, you are right up on my list of great fighting Americans along with Joe and Valerie Wilson and Dr. Howard Dean.
Thanks for bringing it on to Emporer Joe and I curse the mainstream Democratic Party for leaving you to the Lieberman attack machine.
Please consider another round in politics.
-GSD
Howie! Yay! :) Glad you found a connection — I knew you’d find some way to say hello today.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 25
Absolutely…
To add to my comment above about changing the political landscape, I tend to think that without your campaign, Ned, Jim Webb might not be in the Senate, nor, perhaps, Jon Testor.
So thanks again!
Ned: Please stay in politics. We need people like you.
Thank you, Ned Lamont. You were the hero of 2006. You can count on my continued support in any future campaigns.
Hey Howie…
NYBri at 31 — Good to see you, too, btw. :)
Christy Hardin Smith @ 36
Wouldn’t miss this…
I think it goes without saying that Ned would get as much, or probably MUCH MORE support from us should he decide to run for office again.
You can count on my support 100%, Ned!
Good Afternoon Mr. Lamont,
Thank you for all you have done and continue to do. I remember the first meetup at the Silver Star Diner with about 50 people in the room, thinking “God, I hope this guy Lamont can pull an upset off”. And you did, except that CT had no way to stop Lieberman from his insidious plan to circumvent the peoples’ will.
Which leads me to this: I want to attend the Connecticut Democratic Party next month. But Nancy DiNardo, as chairwoman, and antendee at Lieberman’s victory celebration, makes me wonder just what has become of our Democratic party in CT. Joe was no longer a Dem, but there she was in the thick of the Lieberman crowd. Who can we actually trust to do the work of the Democrats in this state? It’s so disheartening, to say the least.
Thank you again. Words cannot ever express my appreciation for what you and your lovely family did for us all.
By the way, I was pleased to see that Wes Clark was one of the all too few national Dems who came to CT to support you.
I’m a big fan of Clark’s and wonder what’s your opinion of him. If he gets in to the race, would you support him?
Hello Ned. Thank you so much for your campaign. I think this quote in the post
explainssums up where we’ve come to:Is this what you learned in the campaign? That it doesn’t matter who the members of Congress are. They are merely bought-and-paid-for stand-ins, like MPs in the rotten boroughs of England.
The people with power are those who set policy. Senators and Representives merely carry out their will. Democracy in America is over.
I know this is cynical, and I hate it. I’m an old broad who grew up in what I believed was the greatest country in the world. I don’t believe that anymore. And it makes me sad.
Thanks so much for coming here today, Ned. It was great to see you at the party the other night and I was so glad yo were willing to come by and chat with the community. You’re a real hero here for all you’ve done.
Ned - many, many thanks again for everything you’ve done. the time, heart, hopes, effort and money you and your family put into trying to help CT, our country and the world is greatly appreciated. you have my admiration and respect. please give my thanks again to your family.
Morris Sheppard @
32
Welcome and I second this one. You made a huge difference.
Yes, I am helping out Chris Dodd any way I can- he stood up for our campaign in the general and took some heat for it, he is right on the big issues, he is a great guy who will wear well in the retail politics of Iowa and NH, and, did I mention, he is my senator from CT. But I can’t say that I have heard much bold thinking from any of our our candidates to date so now is the time to speak out.
Connecticut Bob @ 38
Absolutely! We need you in the 4th Ned.
Ned!
How’s your Harvard seminar going? This was the first I’ve heard of it, but I wish I were an undergrad again …
Too few people realized the Senate race was a titanic struggle between Harvard and Yale … and unfortunately, the Yalie Palpatine won. And we all know how well that’s going …
What’s the reaction in CT been like, now that Lieberman has been showing his true neo-con colors again?
And yes, I second every sentiment on here that says your political run was an inspiration. Keep at it!
Mr. Lamont,
Sorry I can’t stick around this morning, but I just wanted to thank you for running. You really did change the course of the campaign by running. I know you’ll say it wasn’t all you, it was bloggers like Jane and all the folks who helped you out, and that’s true. But those people need a locus, someone who we can trust who’s worth supporting because of who he is and what he does. You were that person last year. If you hadn’t started speaking out against the Iraq War, I suspect that the few people who were would still be largely unnoticed.
Anyway, thanks for everything, and good luck in the future. Oh, and let us know how you think we can help.
Are you hearing any talk of a recall of Liebermann as he gets in thicker and thicker with the neocons?
Ned,
I’d like to know more about the CT policy institute you want to start. I’d also like to know if you are willing to get involved with the progressive blog movement with your entrepreneur hat on. FDL has been doing an AMAZING job covering the Libbey case and it has taken a toll in terms of energy and finances. Though we out in the netroots are doing what we can to try to finance it, we need a better structure and apparatus for funding these kinds of ventures. The country needs this kind of outlet for speech and for news and it is not getting it from corporate media.
We could use your help this time around to help us put together a model for funding this kind of really important work.
Oh, and the proprietors of this fair blog have nothing to do with what I just asked. It’s my own question.
Ned, we like our senior homestate Senator. What do you think Chris Dodd has to do to climb toward the top tier of Dem 08 contenders?
Ned Lamont @
9
Thanks for joining us Ned!
Ned, given this historic Obama day, can you tell us what happened with regards to him and your campaign? We volunteers were told many times “Obama’s coming!” but he never showed up. There was a lot of bitterness about this among your field office staff, but no one could actually say WHAT HAPPENED.
A lot of us apply the “Lamont Test” to the 2008 presidential field, and I’d like to know where Obama truly falls on there (just out of curiousity, since I’m an Edwards supporter anyway!).
Jane Hamsher @ 42
From one hero to another.
Cujo359 @ 48
If Ned hadn’t had the courage to speak out when he did, and had a successful primary run, so many candidates would have been running on the wisdom of the DC elites who told them “not to mention the war.” I don’t think we’d be witnessing the Democratic majority in the House we have now if it weren’t for Ned.
Ned rocked! I am a life-long resident of CT– on and off. (I am a hopeless New Englander.) I’ve never seen the kind of excitement generated in the Land of Steady Habits that Ned’s campaign excited. I am already extremely nostalgic.
Ned if there is anything you want us former supporters/volunteers to do, I’m there. I know a lot of other people who feel the same way. It was sheer people power.
Mr. Lamont,
First allow me to echo the appreciative sentiments of the other posters for your efforts thus far.
I’m from Minnesota, where in the next few days we expect Al Franken to formally announce his intent to unseat Republican puppet senator Norm Coleman.
What advice would you offer Mr. Franken regarding unseating an incumbent Senator? Have you spoken to him on this topic?
Thanks again.
Albatross @ 57
Alby
Air America Radio was recently pulled from the New Haven local AM. Do you know if there is a connection, has Franken pulled back from AAR so he can concentrate on Kicking Norm Coleman’s Ass?
bookworm - I went to the Dem Central Committee in Hartford last month with a bunch of folks who go to the Silver Star Diner meetup (like Mike Toto). We asked that the Dem party change their rules so that any Dem primary candidate has to declare that he/she plans on running as an independent candidate BEFORE the primary. Susan B. (Secy of State) even spoke in favor of the request. There was a motion to investigate further.
There were some delegates at the meeting who were offended that our group brought up the shameful behavior of some of our elected Dem leadership during the campaign. Some accused us of being “accusatory” and the discussion got quite heated. At the end we agreed to disagree - but I think they definitely got the message.
Mr. Lamont,
In your service, we exposed a facet of the Beast’s visage.
Kudos to you for your sterling efforts, and best of luck in your future endeavors.
Ned, You’re getting a lot of questions so I won’t add to that list (plenty of my CT blogosphere colleagues to do that).
I just wanted to let you know how your campaign changed me. I was born in NYC, but moved to Connecticut when I was 11. My family and I have lived in CT for more than half of my life, yet I always identified myself as a New Yorker. I never had a sense that I was really from Connecticut. I never bought into being there in some regards.
That changed when you ran for Senate. I got involved, volunteered, blogged, and took part in your campaign. Your campaign made me realize that I am in fact from Connecticut and I now proudly identify Connecticut as my home state, even if I’m now back in New York.
This may be the smallest thing that you get thanked for, but I wanted to let you know how much I appreciate you helping me better understand who I am and where I come from.
Matt Browner-Hamlin
Many thanks for the kind words but frankly without Jane and Howie and Firedog and the blogs and all of you, we would never have got as far as we did. Back when the establishment said our race was impossible, you guys stepped up and hopefully we sent a message that was heard on primary day and beyond. Frankly, I think we have alot of good democratic candidates for president and lots of material to work with.
As a Stamford resident, I can say that the reaction to what Joementum is doing in admitting finally that he has turned republican, has been pretty bad.
What should our recourse be?
I dont think we have a recall option here, but we should!
The guy flat out lied, he was put in office by republicans and certain Dems who owed him…and now are we just stuck?
Thanks for speaking up Ned! You raised the consciousness of the whole country and brought a dialog to light that had been whispered by peple afriad that their patrotism would be questioned if they spoke.
YOU should be very proud of your part in the turning on the tides…and I hope that you will continue to participate in full as a very important voice in our democracy!
Jane at 55 — You know that I completely agree with that 100%. In my mind, this is reason number one that people need to stop listening to the voices inside the Beltway more than they listen to the voices of their own constituents. It’s high time the folks in Washington remember that they work for us, and not the other way around.
Thank you, Ned, for bringing that lesson home to so many of the folks were were trying to reach with it. Kudos, truly, for such a wonderful campaign on so many issues that are important to all of us.
Ned Lamont @ 62
AMEN!
Matt Browner Hamlin @
61
You did so much for the campaign, Matt, your “in kind contributions” were extremely valuable. It was great to get to know you and work with you there.
Jane Hamsher @ 55
That’s right, I think. If Ned hadn’t shown them that it was acceptable to be against the war, far fewer DC politicians would have dared. Anyway, thanks to both of you for the campaign.
Ned Lamont @ 45
I think my problem with Chris Dodd is I sometimes suspect he has some stale DC-itis. I am still waiting to see if another “Howard Dean” comes forward before I decide to support one candidate over the other.
Next steps: We are working with the Ct legislature and legislatures across the country via ProgressiveStates.org to pas resolutions opposing the surge, and in two weeks COW (Ct Opposes the War) will hold town meetings across the state. I will be participating.
Jane Hamsher @ 66
You did so much for the campaign, Matt, your “in kind contributions” were extremely valuable. It was great to get to know you and work with you there.
Thanks Jane! I’m glad I could help such a great campaign - and great getting to know you there too!
Ned Lamont @ 45
I’m glad to hear that. Many of us who supported you have also let Senator Dodd that he has a lot of progressive grassroots support. I think he has done a great job of standing up against Bush’s plan to escalate.
JoeMustGo,
Yes, Franken’s last day is this Wednesday, and it’s believed that he will announce his candidacy and that this is the reason that he is leaving.
Your comment also points out why we need the return of the Fairness Doctrine. All across America, successful progressive talk stations are being flipped to non-political formats, such as local sports, by the conservative national conglomerates that own too much of our public airwaves.
As the focus of a lot of conservative propaganda, I hope Mr. Lamont will offer his thoughts on how this nation could reclaim its public airwaves and gain some balance in coverage.
(BTW, you quoted my message before I could edit out “Republican” in reference to Holy Joe: the comment software omitted my ironically-intended strikethrough of that word, so I edited the word out shortly after posting)
Quick note: if you’re not currently receiving email updates from Ned, and want to hear from him about his future efforts, you can sign up here.
Dear Mr. Lamont,
Just wanted to take the chance to let you know how important I think your candidacy and the way you conducted it, were to the last election cycle. It was unfortunate that Mr.Lieberman was, in effect, able to lie his way into keeping Ct’s senate seat but at least you really fought for it and fought to get important ideas out there. The work you did was not wasted–not by any means. I hope that you will try again in six years, if another position doesn’t come open that suits you better. We need dedicated citizens such as you to step forward.
aimai
Mr. Lamont, it was a pleasure to canvass for you last year. I met a lot of resistance among the elderly, blue collar and disabled. Do you think you might have been able to reach these people with more time? The time between the primary and general was rather short. I got the feeling that explaining the strategic aspect to defeating Lieberman to low info voters needed more infiltration and finesse than time allowed. Do you think time was critical in this respect? Also, how important was AIPAC money to Lieberman’s success? One assumes he wouldn’t have been able to run ads without some source of funds.
I know you recieved a fair amount of netroots critism for not doing ’stick-in-the-eye’ politics during the general, when lieberliar had no such scuples. As a small doner to your campaign I, too, wanted you to be a more ‘kick’em-in-the-nuts’ candidate but I realize now that you were right and I was wrong. I think the example you set is exactly the one dems need to follow if we are going to get our politics out cynical gutter in which the klepto-corpratists have kicked it.
Clear thinking, truth telling and a sense on humour; I hope you will either run again or take Dean’s job when he retires.
Cujo359 @ 67
mui @ 68
HOW CAN WE HELP CHRIS DODD TO BE THE CANDIDATE HE NEEDS TO BE? We already have, to some extent. I know his staff has placed importance on him staying connected with Connecticut senate constituents. He took on Tim Tagaris. Does he have any policy people we know from our recent favorite campaigns? I voted for Nader in 2000 (CT=safe state) because Gore would not oppose Star Wars. That’s all it took. Show me you have no cojones, and no vota for you.
Albatross @
72
Why? If it walks like a duck, and it quacks like a duck . . . .
Standing up against escalation is fine, but I want Congress to get out front opposing the administration’s drift towards a military response in Iran. The Dems seem unsure how to respond here, and it feels like 2002 all over again.
Hi, Ned! It’s great of you to join everyone here at FDL today! I hope you see from the comments how much support you’d have if/when you decide to run again.
As someone above said, policy is incredibly important, but when it comes to actually changing the country, it takes lawmakers with integrity and courage and a willingness to stand up and take risks. You have demonstrated all that and more, and that’s incredibly rare. You’ve earned the trust and admiration of thousands of people all over the country, and that’s something that few candidates have when they throw their hats in the ring.
When I joined the staff after the primary, it was always such a treat to see committed volunteers from the FDL community show up at the Norwalk and Stamford offices willing to do anything we needed. One commenter who probably wants to remain nameless (but who I’ll never forget) got a hotel room for the last 5 days of the campaign but I don’t think he ever used it since he pulled all-nighters along with the rest of us, doing sign blitzes at 3AM and greeting commuters at the train station at 6AM. This is an amazingly committed online community to have on your side!!
Ned at 69 — That is wonderful to hear. I know that Sen. Feingold has been working with some state legislative groups as well — no idea if COW is one of them.
I don’t have a question. I just wanted to share an anecdote.
I met Hillary Clinton at a NYC fundraiser she attended for Ned about two weeks before the general election.
She made a speech in which she discussed the importance of person-to-person contact. She stated that regardless of funding differences, Democratic candidates like Ned had an advantage if their supporters talked to all their friends and spread a positive message for the candidate via the grassroots. From one real person to another.
After her speech, I approached Hillary and told her that I absolutely agreed with her statement about the vital importance of person to person contact. She smiled.
I continued:
“And that is why I believe it is absolutely critical that President Clinton goes to Connecticut in the next two weeks to campaign, in person, for Ned Lamont.”
Hillary responded by saying that President Clinton’s ’schedule is very full’ for the next few weeks and it was unlikely he would be able to do it.
Unacceptable.
I proudly display my Stand up for Change sign in my studio. Thank you for standing up, speaking out, and demonstrating what leadership is all about.
I was happy to see the e-mail about you joining the Board of Directors of the Progressive States Network. It’s inspiring to see your commitment and passion for change is continuing.
Ned Lamont @ 79
Yeah. And it doesn’t feel good. If you think Iraq is a debacle, just wait.
Ned Lamont @ 68
This is fantastic. I believe I misread what I quoted back at you earlier. I still think it’s a national tragedy that Lieberman finessed the election. The Democrats in Connecticut who voted for him must be deeply ashamed.
Ned:
As an entrepreneur and businessman, what accounts for the peculiar American aversion for taxes, communal programs, and the sense of the commonweal as being essential to a stable, healthy productive society?
Most of the developed world has come to understand that the health and safety of any individual is predicated, in part, on the health and safety of all. But the US seems to have an irrational aversion to any hint of government policy being used to alleviate suffering and poverty.
Why a minimum wage or universal health care should still be so contentious is a mystery to many of us. Kind of like why ’secular’ or ‘liberal’ should be words of contempt…or why evolution is still a ‘debate’.
Is this primarily the fault of education, politics, the press?
Thank you for everything, Ned. You’ve been awarded a “Howardly“.
Mr. Lamont—
Your primary success electrified people across the country. So many people became more active because of the good example of your campaign in Connecticut.
I honestly think this pushed us over the top in the Senate. I live in Virginia, and saw the upsurge of political activism here—including, frankly, my participation—as your campaign took off there.
Thank you and please do stay in public service. We need you and we admire you.
————-egregious
Ned … please let us know any way we can help on Iran! It sure looks like the drums are beating, complete with the Gordon piece this morning in the NYT which makes me feel like Judy Miller is back in another guise.
We really need your voice and ours to stop this.
LindaR @ 85
What, you think our neighbors have a concience? Many had their own personal reason to vote for Joe, the nation be damned. He’s a good boy, you know.
Ned Lamont @ 79
People in this community are pretty alarmed about the administration’s drift toward Iran. I wrote to Rosa Delaura and she wrote back that there was something in the works or something like that. Whatever is being done is not strong enough. This administration is giving us war critics a giant ulcer. I wish we could all come together with the steam of a campaign and stop this madness.
Air America has a new owner in Stephen Green, brother of Mark Green, and we are very hopeful that he will put a great schedule back on the air and concentrate also on the online world, which wil likely be the future of radio as more and more of us go wireless, satellite, and podcasting …syndication…and I am very hopeful that we will see the return of some of the programming that was available before Danny Goldberg tore the place apart. For me that would be Marc Maron back with a daily show.
Thomm Hartman will take Al’s seat, and yes, he is likely running.
I assume that his departure is due to the sale and election, but is was clear for a very long time to anyone who listens to him even a little that he was planning on leaving and planning on getting into politics beginning with his home state. he has always done political work, and has never tied himself to one project for more than a couple of years…so it makes sense.
I am excited to see what Green might do with AAR, and the knowledge that he is well funded and grounded in liberal ideals, is heartening…But, you never know.
Yes, we need the fairness docterine or something like it back.
I am all for reregulation of all sorts!
Ned, maybe you should have a show on AAR…it would be fantastic!
Freaked-Out Canadian @ 84
I think it’s because the decendants of Puritanism raise their ugly heads every once in a while until the decendants of the Enlightment remember who the heck they are and quit taking such silliness seriously.
Ned Lamont @ 69
That’s wonderful, Ned. Please keep us posted. Anything we can do to help you get the word out.
Thank you Ned, thank you FDL, and all contributors today. Let’s keep pushing to restore Constitutional Democracy to the United States of America!
I dont think that Chris Dodd has it…he is too steeped in the DC crap and not charismatic enough. Like it or not, these things count!
I dont see getting on the Dodd bandwagon…and am much mor einterested in Edwards at this point…watching Obama warily, though he did a fantastic speech today!
Everyone has already said the things I wanted to, so you’ll get just as hearty WELCOME and THANK YOU FOR EVERYTHING, Mr. Lamont.
You galvanized us and gave us a real candidate with real issues. That scared a lot of folks, in a good way.
Bless you.
Maura @ 80
Ditto that, Maura. And good to see you here, too.
Senator LamontMr. Lamont, you’re probably way ahead of us on this, but I wanted just to include some comments that Ambassador Joe Wilson made at FDL back in December 2006.Just gratitude and appreciation to you, Mr. Lamont. Thank you for what is still a victory. Time will make that more painfully obvious for those who still haven’t figured that out. Your campaign was a big win for we who believe that the people still have power.
I hope you plan to rock the boat again. I’m in Illinois and will proudly Barack the vote. Wish you all had representation like Dick Durbin and Obama.
I blog with some folks that worked very hard for the Lamont campaign over at DNC Kickin’ Ass. We supported you with donations and positivity. We’ll do it again. Just say when.
Again, thank you for giving it a helluva try. I hope you will consider it a very good start!
Thank you, Mr. Lamont. Your courage and hard work planted the seeds of hope.
Ned @ 79
Standing up against escalation is fine, but I want Congress to get out front opposing the administration’s drift towards a military response in Iran. The Dems seem unsure how to respond here, and it feels like 2002 all over again.
Part of the problem is language, as always. Even a direct, prescient, perspicacious guy like you calls it “the administration’s drift towards a military response in Iran”.
It’s not a “drift”, nor is it a “response.” The White House is preparing to attack Iran, or to provoke the circumstances by which they can attack. It is planned, deliberate, and immoral.
Stronger language is needed here. And stronger action too.
Just a reminder for everyone, please keep this thread for on-topic comments as much as possible. Any off-topic discussions should eb taken to the prior thread. Thanks!
Did Howie lose his WiFi?
Yes, I have talked with the Air America folks…they would make a great on air complement to Firedoglake. And yes, freakedoutcanadian…too many ideas get caught in the crosshairs of left-right debate instead of judging them on the merits.
Jane Hamsher @ 55
Absolutely!
Ned it was an honor and a pleasure to campaign for you. You’re a great man who has done so much for this country, at a time when it has been desperately needed. I am eternally grateful.
Being in the room for your primary acceptance speech ranks as a highlight of my life. We changed the world that day. :)
i’d love to volunteer for another Lamont campaign! … whether it’s for political office, advocating policy changes (esp. healthcare), preventing an attack on iran or ending the occupation/war with iraq. let us know if we can help, ned.
Ned-
I wanted to address healthcare in CT and across the country with you.
What are your thoughts on how we can at least ensure our children?
My son is on the Husky program and I have spent numerous hours trying to get him the care he needs but they offer NO providers who will take the insurance. This is not only because the reimbursement is so low, but because the administration is so bad (by Blue Cross and Blue Shield for our plan) that they are swamped with paperwork and whole offices on the phone.
It took an entire year to get an operation approved and now, even with approvals gone through with a fine toothed comb I am still receiving bills because providers havent been paid…
How can we enact laws that prevent entities like Blue Cross and Blue Shield from throwing a wrench in the system so large that they stymie healthcare for our KIDS!!
Melina @ 96
Agreed that Dodd’s charisma has not shown in the last month. But have you seen him in person or watched a good tape? He has it, or used to have it. He can calmly explain an issue position, but the best is that there was no one in CT a Dem would prefer to fire up the crowd with a red meat campaign speech. I hope he can bring it to South Carolina and Oklahoma and Arizona….Hee Yaaaa!
Let’s all channel nice thoughts to Howie’s wifi connection. Like “Work, you SOB!”
Ned, what do you think of Governor Rell’s proposed tax hike to cover increasing education costs while she plans to eliminate the estate tax?
And what do you think about Speaker Amann’s verbal sparring with Rell on Thursday?
Ned Lamont @
105
Wow. I hope you claim a spot on every medium you can find time for!
Ned,
I hope you saw the previous thread. It gives a taste of why this was so important to all of us, why you were so important.
Whatever you choose to do, we are with you.
mui@91
People in this community are pretty alarmed about the administration’s drift toward Iran.
Grrr,
“Drift” again.
The administration is not drifting. Their aircraft carriers aren’t out of gas in the Gulf and being carried by the currents toward Iranian shores.
Patriot missles aren’t tumbling over the sand dunes toward the Iraqi border.
This is no “drift”. It is a period of obfuscation to give the administration time to move its troops and weapons into position, and to stockpile its logistical resources.
This is not passive, or accidental. It is not “drift”. It is deliberate.
And it is going to take more than “drift” to stop it. The administration needs to be called out and, right now, only Feingold seems to be willing to step forward.
Ned, I am going to write to AAR and ask them to consider a show foryou like Bobby Kenedy’s show. You have so much to say and it would be something that you could do on the run, and not tied down…
I think that the country would benefit.
If it is OK with you I would encourage everyone to write to the Greens as they take over this month and request this idea for at least a weekly show for Ned.
we could promote it via our liberal blogs, and blog live during it.
I am so on board with that, and would definitly volunteer any time that you might need for research assistance or whatever….
Dear Melina:
Edwards has the most interesting and specific healthcare plan to date- allowing us to buy into medicare and other large pools which may not discriminate. There is an individual mandate and costs to business which do not provide affordbale healthcare insurance. We proposed something similar during our campaign. It is not ‘conservative’ for the politicians to keep nibbling around the edges of our healthcare system which is broken, costly, and discriminatory.
Ned, I’m glad your e-mail list appears to still be up and running and glad that you are staying so involved in the debates of our times.
You have a great political ear and I hope you will continue to trust those great instincts. You knew that the public wanted a candidate who spoke out against the war, and now you are again taking the forward-leaning position with respect to Iran. We need your voice. Thank you and hope we can help you out in the future.
Mr Lamont, Surprisingly to me I am a bit choked up, I had no idea this would turn out to be such an emotional moment. Never the less, you really moved this hillbilly last year and I am so sorry I wasn’t able to move to CT for the Summer and help out. Most of all I want to thank you and your family for speaking truth to power and lies for peace and health of your fellow citizens, with heart and class.
That said, it’s amazing how much you won by just initiating and fighting the battle. I stand at the ready, in support of you in the next one.
Thanks so much
Mr. Lamont, I’m 57 years old and had never contributed to a political campaign until your campaign prompted me to send some money to Blue America. I also did my first volunteer work for the Maryland governors campaign. I know I’m not the only person your campaigned energized in this way.
You have given the progressive cause a “gift that keeps on giving” as I and others will be contributing and volunteering in the future.
“
Agreed that Dodd’s charisma has not shown in the last month. But have you seen him in person or watched a good tape? He has it, or used to have it. He can calmly explain an issue position, but the best is that there was no one in CT a Dem would prefer to fire up the crowd with a red meat campaign speech. I hope he can bring it to South Carolina and Oklahoma and Arizona….Hee Yaaaa!
“
The voters of this country are in such a morass that they need to see fire or…something…They need a realy strong leader who is speaking truth, so that they can remember what it sounds like!
I just don’t see it there and I feel almost like an animal in my quest to put a Dem in the top seat and to take over as much as possible in order to marginalize Joementum an his few friends (Barney the Dog and Bush…?)
I’m if California, but donated to you several times. I think that state boundaries are no longer an issue when it comes to electing say, even local officials who share our progressive views. What is your take on this?
CityGirl @ 117
Amen to that. Hope you stay in it, Ned. You are needed.
Why can’t more of your political figures have the decency and moral
courage of Mr. Lamont?
Senator Lamont,Mr. Lamont, this probably comes as no surprise to you, but below is a response in bold that I received from Durham Monsma of the Stamford Advocate.This is almost exactly the same response Durham sent me after I “spotlighted” another Jane Hamsher post to him prior to the CT General election. Mr. Monsma, clearly had no problem with the massive help Karl Rove and the GOP were giving Lieberman from outside CT.
I have not seen it on this thread yet, but your campaign soaked up enormous amounts of GOP resources that otherwise would have been used to defeat Webb in VA or Tester in Montana.
Ned Lamont @ 116
I just always think that if I’m having tourble, imagine the inner city kids downtown….
I am doing alot with a foundation currently in education of inner city kids…but it is clear to me that if we cant ensure their nutrition and basic healthcare outside of the emergency room clinic, we’re lost.
A kid that I took up to a local school this past week (he has been accepted and is going to attend next year…is exceptionally brilliant) was us telling me that the lunch was the best food that he has ever tasted!
Too many kids around here (not to mention in Bridgeport and more desperate places)are getting 2 of their 3 meals from a system that feeds them such crap as to be criminal!
We need a universal single payer healthcare plan and we need to re-regulate insurance companies so that THEY Are marginalized to providing extra little policies to the rich or whatever.
Hey Ned!
I agree time to get in front of this “invade Iran” thing. This should be shown to Congress: http://lucasgray.com/video/peacetrain.html
And they should inform Bush if he invades Iran they will begin Impeachment hearings. What happened to the America who would only attack in self defense?
How do we stop this train wreck?
In our closing minutes, I am gratified that none of you have lost your political voices or your passion. We need you to standup and speak out against the escalation in Iraq, the confrontational approach to Iran, and a head in the sand attitude towards the big problems confronting our country- be it healthcare, energy independence, the environment, and jobs. I am trying to speak out through our web site, which we hope to resuscitate, and working at the state level to see if we can take the lead in solving these issues if Washington can not.
Since this is a BlueAmerica thread, I wanted to encourage others to join me … I’ve set up a monthly donation to the Blue America Pac … not big, but it will add up as we look to ‘08 … so we can continue to support great candidates like Ned in the early stages when they really need that initial help … as well as when we get closer to the actual elections.
http://www.actblue.com/page/blueamerica08
Mr Lamont,
What’s your take on “non-binding resolutions”, specifically as they relate to troops escalations and so forth, sending a message to the Bush administration? Do you agree with Senators Feingold and Dodd when they characterized such”toothless” resolutions as meaningless?
Ned, the re-emergence this week of Dan Gerstein (blogger and Lieberman’s attack dog spokesman in the general) as a “Democratic strategist” on MSNBC and other talking-heads cable shows reminded me how much I wish you were out there on the news as well — I’d love to see you on the cable talk shows as a counterpoint to Lieberman’s antics or clearly and unequivocally articulating your views on health care, Iraq, etc.
Your voice is sorely needed in the TV-news-talk maelstrom.
Thanks for coming by, Ned. We all appreciate it.
Maura @ 130
Amen to that.
Ned, thank you for showing up today; and thanks to Jane, Christy and Howie for putting this together!
In case anyone here wants to see the video of Ned’s big “thank-you” party last month, I front-paged it on my blog this morning. You’ll see quite an assortment of local bloggers along with some more well-known figures (including Jane posing with CT Blogger), and Ned has a nice speech in the middle, introduced by George Jepsen.
It was a fun evening, and showed just how much Ned is appreciated and respected by the people who helped his campaign.
Keep speaking Ned…we need you!!!
Mr. Lamont,
I’m a Wes Clark supporter and I am glad he supported you and campaigned with you. Also, loved the ad.
Keep up the good fight.
Connecticut Bob @ 133
Wish I could have been there, but was infected with a bug I didn’t want to spread to you all.
First, I want to add my voice to the many here expressing deep gratitude to you and your many volunteers. I firmly believe that while we must suffer another term with the sole member of the Friends of Joe Lieberman Party caucusing with the Democrats whilst sabotaging all significant Democratic initiatives, the impact of your standing up and facing the issues forthrightly continues to have an impact, not only on the immediate past election cycle, but in the run up to 2008.
That said, I do have a question: I live in a congressional district which continues to be “written off” by the Democratic Party (OR-2). Is there a way that the pertinent parts of the “Stand Up” campaign play book could be shared to give people who want to take back a district a “leg up”?
J-M
Thank you, Ned - just say the word and we will be there in a heartbeat.
Ned Lamont @ 127
Ned, please do. Your leadership is needed.
Thanks so much for stopping by today, Ned — your voice and your continued political work is very, very much appreciated. And a needed antidote to all the apathy that so many folks in America seem to feel about politics today. Thanks so much for your courage in putting yourself on the line to run for office — kudos!
And folks, if you can please keep the comments on topic in this thread, we’d very much appreciate it. Makes it easier for our guest to come back and read further thoughts and questions later, if and when he may have time to do so in his busy teaching and activisim schedule. :)
I would like to see a a strong bipartisan resolution pass congress asap opposing the escalation. The train is leaving the station on the new deployments and congress is debating filibusters. Binding resolutions and perhaps a call for another vote on a declaration of war seem appropriate- let congress speak up or down on whether they want America to fight this war. I know where I stand.
kdoug @126
Gorgeous slideshow, a lovely glimpse of an Iran most Americans will never see (how many know it snows there?) and the perfect reminder that ignorance and prejudice are the seeds of war and its fertilizer.
Hi Ned:
The day you made your speech a year ago, saying you were going to run against Lieberman, I faxed a letter through to your business (the only way I knew to contact you at that time), to say THANK YOU for giving us back hope, and that I was here for you however you needed me. I still say thank you and I am here if I can help further the Progressive adjenda any way I can.
Please consider running against Shays. That creep shamed us yesterday while interviewing that Contractor’s wife and belittling her. Let’s turn CT totally Blue next election!
Stay well, friend.
Pam
Ned, a big thank you from Sue and Lorenzo Sunflower. We are now working on the Connecticut for Lieberman Party. There is never any downtime in keeping that man accountable.
You have started something very important.
Ned Lamont @ 141
And so do we!
Thank you for taking that stand over and over again. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to try to make a difference through your campaign.
re: Getting in front of the Iran campaign..
If the administration won’t do it officially, perhaps private efforts could enter into dialog with Iranian representatives? Mightn’t that be a useful forum for understanding, for clearing the air, and possibly for rebutting some of the more contentious charges being aimed by the Bush administration?
Thanks, Ned. Keep up the good fight. You made many Canadian care about CT politics. You have a rare gift.
Ned Lamont @ 141
Early in the week, Dodd said he would oppose the resolution because it was not binding. Did that hold? I have not heard. His knowledge of the war powers act and constitutional procedure are highly regarded. Could this, a tough and noisy stand right now, be his foundation for 2008?
kdoug @ 126
It is so good to see Ned leading the charge once again - and I really do hope we back him and all efforts as strongly as we did his campaign as someone said above - to stop the coming attack on Iran.
And I hope everyone looks at Kdoug’s link - and passes it around … thanks Kdoug for this!
Many thanks to all the CT bloggers including CT Bob and Maura and Matt, let’s get together soon and rally our team for the February 24 town meetings (CTCOW.org) and to all of you who supported our campaign over the last year, Joe said on primary night that it was the end of the first half; I am a hockey player and we are now tied up at the end of the 2nd period. More later, bye everybody and be well Jane.
Ned
Thanks for coming here today, Ned. You are always an inspiration.
Dan Gerstein, Lanny Davis, Richard Goodstein, Marshall Wittman, Al From, et al, and the entire DLC are a far more virulent pest infecting the Democratic party. Their days appear numbered, however, not least of which to thank Ned Lamont for exposing them as the blight on the political landscape they most certainly are.
Freaked-Out Canadian @ 147
Now *that* is a success, considering before Ned we were called a “political backwater,” or some other such thing.
BTW: pardon the euphemism. I like to alternate strong and less strong language. Just writing style.
RevDeb @ 145
Nice one. Glad someone remembered to do that!
Howie is lost in the toobz.
Ned Lamont @ 150
Thanks again Ned, and you can count on me to be there on the 24th!
Jane Hamsher @ 155
in a “Being John Malkovich” kind of way?
http://lucasgray.com/video/peacetrain.html
And I hope everyone looks at Kdoug’s link - and passes it around … thanks Kdoug for this!
You’re more than welcome. I came across it from “amazingchicken” over at DailyKos … I AGREE! We should pass this like to everyone we know and then encourage them to pass it on …
Jane Hamsher @ 155
Must…refrain…from…inappropriate…humor…
Ned Lamont @ 150
Name your time; I’ll be there! As a huge hockey fan (go BU!) I’m all about rooting for the team that makes a huge comeback in the 3rd period. Being on the team makes it even more fun, and you’ve still got a hell of a team all over the country who want to keep fighting together.
Ned, thanks for being here - it was a treat! Howie, Jane, and Christy, thanks for putting this together.
Dear Ned,
If only the national Democratic Party and the Senate leadership displayed half the courage you showed us, they (and we) would not be dealing with the consequences of propping up their majority with the weak and rotting timber of Joe Lieberman.
You set fire to the grassroots, and are responsible for the victory upon victory that occurred elsewhere.
The leadership wanted to have it both ways - willing to settle for less, that is exactly what they got.
Dear Ned,
Congratulations on becoming a winning voice for the Democratic Party.
Congratulations on winning a platform from which you sent a message that resonated in every senate race accross the U.S. last year.
Congratulations on winning a greater voice for those of us in the netroots. We need more leaders with your bravery to represent our views. I feel like your campaign helped to catapult my frustrations about what is broken in this country, and my values over how it needs to be fixed, into the national dialogue in a way that no other campaign did last year.
Congratulations for continually taking the high road and treating voters and your fellow citizens with respect when I know the temptations and the pressure to pander and manipulate were put on your campaign day after day.
Today I wish I were saying “congratulations” for your election victory. However, the election night result was the only setback in a campaign that accomplished so much and gave so much meaning to last year’s process. Today, we are all benefiting from what you did and that value, that gift, will continue to grow and to matter for all of us.
So Ned, congratulations on an extremely successful campaign — not coming in first was the only setback we had.
sláinte,
cl
Hi Ned,
It was great to campaign with you in Connecticut. I suspect your state’s voters are wishing they could have a do over! Keep up the good work. We need you to remain engaged. Joe Wilson
ps.
Sorry, late again . . .
Thanks Christy Jane & Howie et al . . .
Mr Lamont,
Are you hearing from Lieberman voters that they have made a mistake? Especially after Lieberman’s caustic move to the right.
(Good on ya for running)
Hi Ambassador Wilson, always a great honor to have you on an FDL thread. I hope you’re enjoying FDL’s coverage of the Scooter trial.
got here at the end -sad face here - but wanted to say thanx to ned for his effort against a faux democrat! as a new jersey girl i hope he does run again and i’d be happy to assist in my small way. enough cannot be said for FIREDOGLAKE in pulling all types of people into the “political lake” and we know all things are political ok - thanks again ned for your great run!
Joe Wilson @ 163
Joe Wilson! Unfortunately, I think some voters are still in a stubborn state of denial.
SING OUT LOUISE!!!
“Getting the money out of politics” is only the beginning, IMO.
What say you Ned?
Thank you Ned!
And, not OT I hope, but I would like to thank Jane for her work here, way before Ned declared, in shining the spotlight on Lieberman’s hypocrisy. With that background, it was immediately clear to many how important the CT senate race would be.
VG - good point! I’ve detested Joe since he was elected but would not have though a challenge had any chance without Jane’s writings and encouragement … and while the outcome was not what we wanted, the impact was immense.
Thanks Jane, Christy and Howie for this moving and memorable Blue America visit from the incomparable Ned Lamont.
You all give new meaning to the wonderful old American adage: Lead by Doing!
(Jane WRT augmenting fresh donation stream at FDL you have mail from Anne H.).
VG - ditto! Without Jane revealing the scum hidden under the shiny wrapped veneer, I would have no idea what lay beneath the LeiberLie.
I’m late to the party, but Ned, you are a great inspiration and a hero. Don’t go away–this nation needs your vision, passion and leadership.
Thanks for the party in New Haven last month, too! Great fun.
New thread upstairs. There is a slight front page hiccup so don’t worry if the front page doesn’t refresh for a few moments.
Yes, add me to the list of volunteers for any Ned Lamont campaign coming up.
Thank you Ned, I hope I have the opportunity to support you in the future! Any chance?
Hi Ned! Sorry I must have missed you. Thanks for the exciting election and for bringing so many good people together. It was a fun race even though the results didn’t go our way. Until next time…
I’m so late to the party—everybody has already left. In case Ned comes back to look at the rest of the comments, I wanted to add this:
Thank you, Ned, for inspiring people all over the country by standing up to Joe Lieberman’s unacceptable support of this appalling war. I wish you had won against that cheater, of course, but I do think that your campaign made a big difference in other races because progressive candidates were energized to speak out strongly, and many of them were surprisingly successful.
I keep thinking of a passage from Dante’s Purgatory, where it is said of the poet Vergil (here I am paraphrasing) that he was like one who goes by night, carrying a lamp behind him: he couldn’t help himself, but he helped those who come after him. I think the same is true of you, Ned. Thanks for inspiring people to believe that we can take our country back and force the Republicans to end this war. It is actually starting to happen.
As someone from Connecticut I want to thank Jane and all of the pups at FDL. You played an instrumental role at putting Ned’s candidacy on the map and in framing the terms of the debate. I hope that Ned and all of us stay engaged in the fight for a more just society for years to come. I love you Jane
And we’re mighty glad Jane has such an awesome “assistant”! wave and big smile from Chitown to one of our heroes.
I’m so sorry I missed this thread.
Ned, if you come back to read, I add my heartfelt thanks to you for your run against Leiberman. As passionately as I despise him, I came to admire you. You brought decency, integrity and common sense to the campaign. You will make a great Senator. And I hope, for the sake of this country, that you will be in Washington, and soon. You are sorely needed.
Meanwhile, I’m glad to see that you are finding other avenues to lead.
Yours was the first campaign that really inspired me to become involved. I drove to CT to canvass for you and there was a LOT of passionate support for you. I so hope you think about running again.
john in california @
76
I want to follow up on this question. But first, thanks, Ned! for taking on a huge challenge running against Sen. Joe.
Obviously, your strategy for the primary campaign was successfulf. But your strategy for the general campaign obviously didn’t work.
(1) Why did your general election strategy fail to win? Was something wrong with the strategy, or was it just plain unwinable?
(2) If you had a do-over, would you conduct your general election campaign (a) the same, or (b) different (and if so, what would you have done differently?
Thanks,
Bob in hi
Howie’s Toobz-Tied
Run again, please, Ned. Would be much appreciated. Chipped in the last time, from here in rainy WA, and would again.
I contributed to Ned Lamont. I’ll contribute again. He is so much more like me than Lieberman. I don’t care what state he’s from. As far as I’m concerned, he can run in California. In many ways, he’s like Jim Webb: Upfront, an upfrontedness that is not vile, indeed far better than vile. I liked Markos’ support. I loved Firedog’s support. Ned is positive. A plus, not a minus. How refreshing is that?
I was with Ned from the beginning. Ned took a machete and hacked the way forward through the jungle. That Lieberman is still in the Senate, more awful than ever, is a great injustice.