
Greetings from the PlameHouse apartment in Washington, D.C. Between packing for my flight, getting to and from airports, flying across the country, and catching up on sleep, I didn't have much chance to follow the news for a shocking 18 hours or so. When I did finally get a look at the headlines, I saw not much had changed:
A suicide truck bomber struck a market in a predominantly Shiite area of Baghdad on Saturday, killing as many as 121 people among the crowd buying food for evening meals, one of the most devastating attacks in the capital since the war started.
. . . The late-afternoon explosion was the latest in a series of attacks against mainly Shiite commercial targets in the capital. No group claimed responsibility, but it appeared to be part of a bid by Sunni insurgents to provoke retaliatory violence and kill as many people as possible ahead of a planned U.S.-Iraqi security sweep.
As I wrote at Needlenose a bit earlier today, I don't think the analysis in that last sentence was entirely accurate:
. . . if you ask me, the Sunni guerrillas aren't trying to get their licks in before Operation Whatever starts, so much as they're taking advantage of Moqtada al-Sadr's decision to hide the Mahdi Army until the latter get a handle on how to circumvent the new U.S. tactics.
It's one of the first rules of a multi-party knife fight — as soon as an opponent takes his eye off you because he's distracted by someone else, that's when you cut him. That's the game we've been watching for the last few years in Iraq.
Over at the Washington Monthly , T.A. Frank had a similarly down-to-earth analogy for the catastrophe that Iraq has become:
So I visit a rundown zoo and see hyenas in miserable cages, lions in miserable cages, and antelopes in miserable cages. I'm disgusted by their conditions, so I attack the zookeepers and set the animals free. The lions eat the antelopes, the hyenas eat the antelopes (and sometimes the lions, too), and the antelopes run for shelter. Should I feel bad for not having minded my own business? No way, says Charles Krauthammer. Hey, who knew that lions liked to eat antelopes?
It doesn't take a learned academic background to understand what's happened, just a grasp of basic power relationships… and, specifically, the tragic fratricide that occurs when there are several well-armed parties, none with enough power to impose its will, but each convinced that they will be annihilated if they drop their guard. Translated into government-ese, the newly released National Intelligence Estimate puts it this way:
..even if violence is diminished, given the current winner-take-all attitude and sectarian animosities infecting the political scene, Iraqi leaders will be hard pressed to achieve sustained political reconciliation…
As you might expect, this is a vast understatement, but the underlying point is dead on: the infection of factional hatred and revenge has passed the point where any antibiotic (applied by the U.S. or anyone else) is likely to do any good. The statements of the Shrub-in-Chief and his minions on the subject of political compromise in Iraq make it sound difficult, but not in a life-threatening way — something on the order of herding cats. To borrow T.A. Frank's analogy, though, it's more like we're trying to herd lions, leopards, panthers, and tigers… all into the same small enclosure, without enough food to go around.
I'm not one to dismiss U.S. hawks' warnings that an American withdrawal from Iraq will lead to even worse bloodshed than we're seeing now — every indicator that I can see tells me that it will. But when there's nothing you can do to prevent it, denial isn't a helpful response. Declaring bankruptcy and/or cutting back on your lifestyle when you're badly overextended with debt is painful, too, but it's more adaptive than going on ignorantly and pretending you're going to win the lottery tomorrow. Someone should tell these hawks that if the consequences of withdrawal are so potentially serious and awful, perhaps we should start planning for it, rather than guaranteeing the worst will happen because we weren't prepared.
Related posts:





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

MUWAHAHAHA
FIRST!!
err
i mean
FRITZ!!!
ok, now for my real comment
as far as our unprovoked war in Iraq to which the president and vice president were told in NO uncertain terms would HARM our fight against terrorism, create a recruiting campaign FOR the terrorists and make our battle almost impossible to win, frank rich has a column in the times tomorrow that is BRUTAL
talking about the apparent mental breakdown of vice president cheney, he goes on to say; [emboldens are mine]
Swopa!
h/t perris!
(somewhere…a zed lurks)
I don’t give a flying f’k what the Bush guys say, I want out of Iraq. Now. Damn it. I support our troops. I want them home.
Good evening.
I just dropped my Princess (15 yrs old) off at a photo session before the Winter Formal. Sniff. My baby done growed up…
It’s sad to think about the fears that we have here compared to the fear in Iraq, where even a trip to the market is risking one’s life.
Sadly, all I can say is, ain’t that the truth!
Iraq. Population control? These people are but ants to the Bush monsters. Same with our soldiers.
Funny thing about Iraq, if we’re talking carnivores, cages, and the size of their food supply – an analogy that I like – there’s more than enough to go around.
Put down your damn guns and start pumping oil, you bunch of animals.
marc @
8
Elegantly stated!
Not.
Muslims are now getting the same treatment Jews had a century ago
Today’s anti-Muslim racism uncannily echoes earlier anti-semitism – both minorities abused as an alien security threat
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comm…..22,00.html
Balrog at 5: Middle child leaves this week for four months in Australia. I had a similar response to this article..the people of Iraq are so brave; going to the “grocery store” requires bravery. It is hard to imagine, I was at the Giant today…didn’t feel brave at all. So hard to imagine their lives. What can Cheney and his ilk be thinking? Can this be just greed? Doesn’t something bigger seem to be in play? What is it?
Note that the bombings at the markets are preventable … Al Sadr had people guarding the neighborhoods but they were forced to stand down by our gang who then refused or were unable to provide equivalent protection to the neighborhoods.
Again @ 11
Nothing that I can comprehend.
What I wanna know…is why it’s taking so long for so many people to wake up to what this guy was saying about Iraq (and a lot of other things) 4 years ago.
There is but one thing I understand about the Iraq thing. Oil. And the connection with a family of Texas oil barons who thinks it was ‘born to rule’.
Nice job Swopa. Dead nuts on.
So. Why exactly are we still in Iraq?
Oklahoma kiddo @
15
I feel the same way. Greedy swine who care only about money, seeing this unlimited goldmine just begging to be stolen. At whatever cost to others.
I have relatives that are totally comfortable fucking others to get more money. Sad.
“Someone should tell these hawks that if the consequences of withdrawal are so potentially serious and awful, perhaps we should start planning for it, rather than guaranteeing the worst will happen because we weren’t prepared.”
Hmmmm, are these the same “hawks” that did such an excellent job planning and preparing for a post-invasion Iraq in 2003, “hawks” that didn’t deploy enough troops to secure Iraq’s cities and borders, as well as act as an armed buffer between Iraq’s many factions? The same “hawks” who didn’t consider securing Saddam’s weapons depots scattered around Iraq to be a high priority, thus leaving them unguarded and ripe for the picking, thus making available to both Sunnis and Shia the weapons to kill one another and U.S. soldiers? The same “hawks” who blew off all the experts on Iraq, including staffing the post-invasion Coalition Provisional Authority with a bunch of non-expert Republican Party hacks?
As long as these same “hawks” are in authority, any plan involving Iraq that might make sense will only end up being incompetently and criminally implemented. Besides, these “hawks” don’t have any plan to extract our forces from Iraq anyway, nor would they listen to anyone with a plan. Thus, their only plan is to punt Iraq downfield to the next administration and let the next president deal with the mess these “hawks” have caused.
We need “new blood” in the White House immediately before these “hawks” shed even more American blood because of their grandiose, imperial presidential schemes.
Oh, BTW, I’ve been reading about surface-to-air missiles bringing down U.S. helicopters. Russian missiles reportedly from Romania, bought on the black market presumably. I couldn’t help but wonder if some old Soviets might be doing to the U.S. in Iraq what the U.S. did to the Soviets in Afghanistan during the 1980s…providing surface-to-air missiles to shoot down helicopters? This would definitely add a new and dangerous element to the maelstrom of madness, Bush-created conflict in Iraq.
Again @
11
If your child needs anything while downunder, let me know always happy to help FDL community. I’m in Brisbane but other FDLers are scattered about the place too.
Another point from the NIE was this:
I found it interesting that an American or Israeli attack on Iran was not included in this list although I believe this would certainly convulse Iraq’s security environment no end.
My theory is the Neocons/Bushes/Powermongers know that Global Warming is real. Rather than working as a unified planet they want to take the biggest piece of the pie they can muster. They see oil as the key to their survival. The rest of us are to be used to that end. As a result we get this mess in Iraq and probably one in Iran. They see the same science we do. Or are they so stupid to believe their own propaganda and they have a 20th century economic outlook?
I wonder, if I had a magic nose and could twitch it and tomorrow oil was just not needed anywhere in the world… what would become of the ME?
just askin’…
Balrog @ 18
this wasn’t about aquiring oil, it was about controling oil
notice the oil is not being produced from Iraq
Iraq was discovered to have even more oil then the saudi’s and the people that invaded Iraq wanted to cut that supply off
the worst part is we don’t need oil, we can be energy independant in 5 years…venezuela is energy independant and now sell their oil abroad
Is anyone else following the Italian connection? I’m loving every minute of it.
Best way of expressing this I have seen anywhere, from anyone, yet.
petedownunder @
20
Well now, Pete, if I and assorted Balrogians were to journey your way, can I call on you?
I pride myself on having friends all over the world. I also like to know I can ring said friends when I’m in their corner.
Never been to your corner, though Ms. Balrog has. Palau is as close as I’ve come.
Say the word and we’ll holler when we get within a phone call.
Very kind of you, thanks!
This Iraq thing is going to spill into a regional war. Then the Israeli military will become more ‘involved’. Sooner, or not much later, nuclear confrontation, will of necessity, materialize. It perhaps is already hopeless.
Heads Up – the hits just keep on coming!
Matt O upstairs talking about … parsons?
The Oracle @
19
Surface-to-air missiles? I just read something by Josh Marshall which suggests it’s the Saudis, wealthy Saudis who are providing anti-aircraft missiles to Iraqis.
Check it out:
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.c…..012259.php
Josh links within this post to a December AP article talking about the Saudi funding/shipping of these items — now being used to bring down our helicopters.
I guess there’s no reason why it can’t be BOTH the Saudis and the Russians…but could you give a link to the source for info on the Russians?
Thanks!
Balrog @ 27
Absolutely. Happy to look after Balrogs big and small. Trex has my email addy or give me yours and I’ll give you my contact info. I’m in the US till Wednesday night then back on the bus to Oz.
There is the small problem of Russian vs. U.S. dominance of controlling the world’s oil supply. Whoever controls, rules.
petedownunder @ 31
Ooooh!
I really wanna see an amphibious bus!
(Wishing you a safe trip!)
latest word from Baghdad … 150 dead, 460 wounded … remember there are virtually no functioning medical facilities for those wounded
Great post Swopa, as per usual.
Iraq has large oil reserves but they are not as large as Saudi Arabia’s. They are not being depleted rapidly because they are not being produced because of the chaos in the country and sabotage. The initial plan of Wolfowitz besides the being greeted with flowers was to use Iraqi production to pay for reconstruction (and probably some of the costs of the war and occupation). This favored increased not decreased production and would have contributed to lower world prices overall. Events on the ground did not follow the script but this was the script.
Energy independence is unlikely in the foreseeable future because beyond the rhetoric and the push for ethanol little has been done. Ethanol is problematic since it contributes to global warming, takes away land from food production, and can not fully replace crude oil under any scenario.
If energy independence became a priority, it would still have to be reconciled with global warming. This would have to include a large scale return to nuclear power. Conservation would also be important. Wind and solar, less so. My WAG would be a time frame of 20 to 30 years minimum.
– WITH THE EVIL MAGIC USED BY BUSH, CHENEY AND CABAL, I THINK WERE ARE BEING ‘SMOKED’. THERE IS SOMETHING FAR BIGGER THAN IRAQ’S INSURGENCY, PERPETUATED BY THE US CIVILIAN CONTRACTORS OVER THERE, FOR JUST THAT PURPOSE. KEEP THE RAGING GOING. KEEP AMERICANS HUDDLED AND SCARED — AT LEAST UNTIL THEY GET ALL THEIR PEGS IN PLACE. DO WE KNOW WHAT A FALSE FLAG OPERATION IS? DO WE SEE THAT IF IRAQ WAS NOT ON FIRE, WE WOULD HAVE NO PURPOSE TO STAY THERE? WE ARE THERE, THEY SAY TO PROTECT AMERICA. THEY DON’T GIVE A RATS ASS ABOUT AMERICA. ALL THEIR ILL GOTTEN GAINS ARE SAFELY OUT OF REACH OFF SHORE, AND ONLY CHENEY, AND MAYBE GOD,KNOWS WHERE… NOW, PASS ME THAT LAST WTC GOLD BAR — SMUGGLED OUT BY THE SUBWAY TUBES, WITH GUILLIANNI’S THUGS . .. NOW SADLY DECEASED, OR SAFELY OFF SHORE… /
Speaking of Saudi oil – I was told by someone that the Saudis were pumping oil at such a rate that it is causing geological shifts, subsidence etc. in such a way that it jeopardizes their ability to continue producing oil – not that there won’t be any left, but that they won’t be able to get at it. Anyone know anything about this?
War a Calamity, Ex-Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski Tells US Congress
by Barry Schweid
WASHINGTON — Zbigniew Brzezinski, former U.S. national security adviser, told Congress the war in Iraq is a calamity and likely to lead to “a head-on conflict with Iran and with much of the world of Islam at large.”
Swopa said:
So in honor of Swopa’s astute analysis, I bring you a repeat of: