
(Fantastic photo by Kevin Lemarque for Reuters. The detail, the color, the snapped isolation of a petulant moment — just brilliant.)
I'm going to type this very slowly in case someone from the Bush White House is reading.
The President is not a king.
He is an elected official, one of many, who serve our nation. And the executive branch is not the most important branch of government. We have this thing called "checks and balances" that the Founders put into place when our nation started. Nifty, huh?
Try respecting them a little more. And also, try being less of an immature jackass:
Near the beginning of the speech last week, Bush congratulated "the Democrat majority" for its electoral victory, using a long-standing Republican formulation seen by many Democrats as a calculated insult. Some liberal bloggers and party strategists saw the president's omission of the last two letters of the party's proper name, Democratic, as a sign of insincerity in preaching bipartisanship….
Bush also said he "didn't mean to be putting fingernails on the board," while noting that the parties need to work together on addressing problems with the Social Security system. "I am surprised, frankly, at the amount of distrust that exists in this town," the president said. "And I'm sorry it's the case, and I'll work hard to try to elevate it. So the idea that somehow I was trying to needle the Democrats, it's just — gosh, it's probably Texas. Who knows what it is? But I'm not that good at pronouncing words anyway."
Yes, because pandering to your Limbaugh base is always the best way to look Presidential.
According to the AP, senators in both parties are pushing back on threats to Iran emanating from the halls of the Bush Administration during the Negroponte confirmation hearings. Looks like when the Democrats won back control of both houses of Congress, someone remembered to take the gags out of the mouths of the "moderate" Republicans. (Or at least perhaps they grew back some balls once the myth of Karl Rove's superior brain was deflated for good.)
For my money, though, one of the best seats on the Hill was in the Senate Judiciary Committee, where Sen. Russ Feingold chaired a hearing yesterday on what the President's powers really are — and are not. (That one must have had Cheney and Addington chomping at the bit.) Sen. Dick Durbin got in a smack at Sen. Orrin Hatch that deserves a reprint:
Senator Durbin countered by citing news articles that said some of the new troops being sent to Iraq are going without adequate training or equipment. “Now who is standing behind the troops?” he asked.
Mr. Durbin suggested that Congress revisit the resolution it passed in 2002 authorizing the use of force in Iraq, since the prime reasons cited in it — the threats posed by Saddam Hussein and by weapons of mass destruction that Iraq was thought to possess — were no longer factors.
“By what authority do we continue this war?” he said.
Is there something you can do to help get the word out that escalation in Iraq is the wrong way to go? Take a peek at this new video that VoteVets is doing — it's powerful stuff — and if you have a little spare change, contribute and help them run the ad where it can do some good persuading a few elected officials against escalation. And send a link to this to any friends and family that you think might be interested in it. Let's help VoteVets.org make this viral.
If you haven't seen this yet, please take a few minutes to sign up for the virtual march against escalation that MoveOn.org is doing. It only takes a few minutes — but adding your name to the list helps them deliver a stronger message to Congress that this is not what America wants. Please take a few minutes and do tis today — they are delivering the petitions tomorrow, and your name could be the one that tips the balance with your members of Congress.
I spend a lot of my time reading the news, watching the pundits, talking with leaders and folks around Washington and around tis nation of ours, and I am no closer to understanding the malicious buffoonery — or craptastic lack of comprehension — that runs the Bush White House. But Dan Froomkin had a window into the joking mind of George Bush that I thought was insightful in some small way, and I wanted to share it with you all:
More from Bush's speech to the exclusive Alfalfa Club on Saturday night, courtesy of my Washington Post colleague Lynne Duke, who received the prepared remarks from a source involved with the dinner.
"As always, I'm delighted to be back at Alfalfa. When I was here last year, my approval rating was in the 30s, my nominee for the Supreme Court had just withdrawn and my vice president had shot someone — ah, those were the good old days.
"What with the polls and everything, the Washington Post said the other day that I was, quote, 'at the nadir of my presidency.' The press always underestimates me. I can go lower."
And: "Hey, let me give you an update on that satellite that was blown out of the sky last week. The Chinese didn't do it. Cheney was out hunting again."
Oh yeah. Too funny. Bet old Harry Whittington's family is just rolling in the aisles on that one. But he is right about one thing: he can go lower.



164 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Christy!
Morning gang — doing dishes here this morning while I’m trying to get the blog geared up and ready for another day of testimony. Whew! What a couple of weeks, huh?
and that, Christy, is what keeps me up at nights.
Good morning Christy – excellent post and great coverage of the Libby trial. What do you think the impact of Judy Judy Judy has been so far? I did not see a wrap up, but then I may have missed something.
Oooooh, I’m tingly. The General says he’s an FDL groupie. Be still my heart — the pillar of heterosexual manliness is hot for FDL. Be still my heart. *g*
Pete at 4 — Jeralyn had a wrap-up last night that was fantastic.
Pete @ 4.
Jeralyn did a great wrap-up last evening and the comments by Pach and others were particularly interesting. Thanks Christy and everyone!
OK, gonna make a claim, you guys tell me I am wrong;
the president wants congress to stop him so he can excise his failure and blame the democrats
he’s sending to few troops without any equipment and he’s challenging us to stop him
he wants it to be as ugly as possible, he wants us to defund all the soldiers and claim we are anti military but he’ll take defunding anyway he can get it so he can claim we were “at the door to victory and the democrats stopped us”
just as they are actually trying to claim the democrats prevented victory in viet nam
so that’s the plan, force us to do what we need to do so he can blame all the harm he’s caused on the democrats lack of resolve
since we know his strategy we can laugh it off and prevent it being effective, but that is his strategy
Christy Hardin Smith @ 2
also, schumer is on c-span1 right now (until 8:30am) for call-in on the topic, “Iraq War Resolutions”.
then at 9:15 (or 9:30?) kissinger and albright are scheduled to testify before the senate foreign relations committee today. i don’t see it on c-span, but one can stream it here (click on the room number for the real player link).
Christy Hardin Smith @ 6
I did read that, and it was excellent. What I meant was more of an impression of how it affected the dynamics of the trial overall. Perhaps I missed that part too, I’m a bit jet lagged this week.
Imus is hammering the “war criminal” Cheney and “that idiot” in the Whitehouse for not attending the opening of the wounded troops rehab center in San Antonio.
Redd, I know you’ve heard this a thousand times by now, but the coverage of the trial is fantastic. I’m spellbound by the live blogging, then I pop in later to read the daily wrap-up – and hope there’s another clip from PoliticsTV.
Thanks again.
raven @ 11
I saw the clip, ya,imus is haveing at cheney and the war, c and L has the clip, take a look, it’s pretty good
Inhofe Live on CNN now – I like that they applied a rainbow background to his name.
As always Christy, you hit it on the head.
I don’t think anything short of impeachment is going to stop this
maniac. He’s really asking for it too. This man has to be stopped and I don’t think the country can afford to keep him in the Oval for another 2 years.
pete at 10 — I think it is too early to tell. She’ll be back on the stand with more cross-examination today, and then Fitz will have a re-direct.
Sigh!
I love the trial coverage too, but I’m more of a sum it up guy vs all the inside baseball stuff. Fascinating!
Christy Hardin Smith @ 5
from the general:
do it general! : let’s see if we can break 100:
Amazon.com Sales Rank: #499 in Books
Pat at 12 — You know, it’s clearly interesting coverage because we have had someone checking in pretty much every day from the Office of the President. My guess is that it is some press office minion, but it’s pretty amusing for me nonetheless. *g*
RevDeb @ 15
I think you are right and I am sure we can mount an affective impeachment, all we have to do is deal
the progressives have to march into a few of the republicans we can stomach, guarantee them we will give no support for to a democrat in the next election cycle if the do what needs to be done protecting america.
then the republicans march in and tell him he’s outa there, either by resignation or impeachment but he’s gone
I know there are still patriots among republican senators just looking for a reason to do it, they’ve lost power because of the president and they will want to keep whatever power they have, they will be happy to take it out on the man that caused their problem, this I believe
schumer is calling for a national employment card with eye-scan data.
sigh.
I think the following document explains the case made for claiming state secrets in order to avoid further investigation. I also think it is the basis that the VP will use if/when he testifies.
Would any of the legal experts have time to explore and discuss this?
Order Dismissing El-Masri v. Tenet, et al (pdf)
Morning everyone! Thanks Christy for this. There is enough in this topic to intrigue scholars for centuries. When honest & smart people debate the very nature of his malaise (is he dumb, or is he intentionally malevolent, or is it after impact of years of coke use, or rapture ideology, major Dad hate, or idolizing fascist heros; is he straight (Laura, Condi), gay (Gannon, Yale rumors), or bi) you know it is complicated.
There is also enough therein to suggest a personality disorder (Axis 2).
btw, Sen. Feingold is on YoungTurks, just FYI.
Christy—awaiting another great day of star-quality trial coverage. Thank you guys so much for doing this.
Marcy’s book is at 5 stars and selling at #485 at amazon.
Btw, interesting customer review ;)
selise @ 22
someone has to tell shumer the problem goes away as soon as we start jailing the employers
selise @ 22
No bar code tattoos on our foreheads?
If anyone missed it last night, reruns today of The Daily Show. They opened with the Libbey trial and their “executive” summary is great.
Hopefully John will post it at C&L.
I cannot wait to hear all about today. You are doing a great job. I really hope that this trial can bring out the real truth about the administrations lies. Keep up the good work. I found out about this site last week when I saw Marcy on c-span and I can’t wait to buy the book this weekend.
egregious — good to see you back home safely. Hope the trip was a productive one for you, but we are awfully glad to have you back at the Lake. :)
Christy Hardin Smith @ 16
They are looking to use her to shut the trial down. If Walton rules that they can ask about other stuff, presumabaly she will refuse, (or, if she’s nuts, try to lie and get caught with the lie) and tehy will have thier mistrial.
Remember, for Wells all he has to do is prevent a conviction. Mistrial, hung jury, these are fine by him.
Of course, I will be surprised if Walton rules that way. I think Fitz and Bennet’s positions (which if I understood the live blogging correctly are pretty close) will be where Walton goes. Ask her about Valerie and Joe, but not other stuff. I would not be surprised if there was overnight paper from both sides.
Who believes that even if prominent republicans march into Bush and tell him it is time to go before the their party is totally ruined, he will actually go away. I don’t. Has he shown ANY comprehension of what is happening to the republican party? NO. His corporate masters and Carlyle are telling him what to do.
well that’s just great I-Man – now when are you going to deal with your “friend and neighbor” Lieberman, Maverick Senator™ John McCain, and at some point, you’ll have to turn your jaundiced gaze to all those serious
pom-pom waversJournalist colleagues, who were complicit and accessories to all the carnage that is Iraq ?!?!?’sokay you sorry ass racist, sexist git, I’ll be right here waiting
“I am surprised, frankly, at the amount of distrust that exists in this town,” the president said. “And I’m sorry it’s the case, and I’ll work hard to try to elevate it.”
[egr bold]
He certainly has done a lot already to elevate the amount of distrust in this town.
If not a typo, then very insightful.
lhp at 32 — Haven’t had a chance to pull up PACER as yet this mornin, but I’d bet you are correct on a motion flurry, with a Bennett paper in the mix if I had to guess. And I hope that Walton stays in the narrow charges rather than opening this up to an irrelevant free-for-all. I think he will — he doesn’t strike me as a tangent loving judge.
GrandmaJ @ 33
I don’t think he’d do it either, then the impeachment sails through
Christy Hardin Smith @
20
Editor and Publisher copped to following FDL’s coverage.
Pachacutec’s Bitch™ wouldn’t happen to have any friends in the eye scan ID card bidness would he ???
I know, it drives me nuts but it’s like that car wreck!
well that’s just great I-Man – now when are you going to deal with your “friend and neighbor” Lieberman, Maverick Senator™ John McCain, and at some point, you’ll have to turn your jaundiced gaze to all those serious
pom-pom waversJournalist colleagues, who were complicit and accessories to all the carnage that is Iraq ?!?!?’sokay you sorry ass racist, sexist git, I’ll be right here waiting
here’s some happy news (not):
from haaretz – Decision to move W. Bank fence undermines peace efforts
from the bbc – US plans to ‘fight the net’ revealed
and this speigel interview with cia’s former europe director is a must read – “We Probably Gave Powell the Wrong Speech“
Welcome Helen Roboerts at 30. I mostly just listen here, but put my 2 cents in every once in awhile. Great people, great conversation, and even better political and legal enlightenment.
Sorry I can’t discuss the Pres b/c I get physically sick. (I try to focus on the fact that he is finally being checked even tho it took 6 long years.)
I’m OCD Judy/Libby trial. I don’t think Judy ends up being a good witness for Fitz b/c of that June 23rd meeting. Isn’t the truth that he asked her if she met with Libby in June and she said “no” and then he showed her the visitor logs. The trial version is that she stumbled across the notebooks and voila, there was a June meeting. I guess that I’m saying b/c she obfuscates/conceals; her credibility is questionable. Not that he needs her; he has got a parade of people coming through to contradict Libby. But she does make journalists look like flakes.
Now I’m off to do my dishes–the house is a disaster. My 2 kids were both sick and I’ve let everything go…
perris @ 27
Yup. Or, do what we did BEFORE, and require employers to send in SS#s and related info for an OK before doing the hiring. This is a Republ-i-cant caused problem.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 31
Thanks, Christy!
Exhausting and maddening. Need to rest and reflect. Rants of various temperatures at my blog.
Hope to see you guys. Am happy to meet the incoming plane from CA.
perris @ 37
Could an impeachment go forward if the preznit classifies all of the evidence and claims ’state secrets’ privilege?
btw, Excellent post Christy and thanks again to everyone for their dedicated, informative work.
Jane S. @ 43
I can’t say how much she helps Fitz. But she doesn’t so much make journalists look like flakes – as herself. As a writer, I practically handcuff my notes to my wrists (ditto my backup external hard drive, and flash cards) when I travel. No way would I leave the notes in a shopping bag in the office and “accidently find them.” (I know where mine are every minute of the day, and they are carefully organized and indexed elsewhere). If I were Judy judy judy, knowing the animus with which other journalists held her at the NYT because of her various hostile acts over the years, I would never leave my notes (and source information) in my office. I think this whole episode shows how dishonest Judy judy judy is. It is nothing more than a made up excuse to keep her from going to jail for a second time.
GrandmaJ @ 42
Thanks Grandma J, I was wondering if this was who I thought it was when I refereshed the comments. I will have to go back and check comments now.
FDL ROCKS!
wow! everyone is chipper this morning! guess I’m the one who needs the coffee….
Morning, all!
rumi @ 23
I sent it to myself in an email. The first page was SO explosive that I want to give it a proper read. I have to leave in a few minutes to go inspect some voting machines as part of an election monitoring program, so I don’t have time to deal with it this morning.
However, Christy, I think the contents may be worth a full post. It’s evergreen and can fit in where ever you have holes. I’ll call you after I have read it. My email seems to be broken today I can’t open them, so I’ll have to revert to Bell technology. The toobz ain’t workin’ so well for me today.
Jane S. at 43 — I had to do the same thing this morning. Trying to keep the server up and humming with the increased traffic has left me very little time to pick up toys and do dishes. We had a mini-cleaning fest this morning. Am feeling much better about the house now — but I’m wishing that I had my own, personal Brady Bunch Alice. *g*
nothing new on PACER this morning.
I heard part of that interview with the presidunce on NPR on my drive home from work. I found myself involuntarily yelling at my radio. I couldn’t help myself.
I guess Rich Lowry did not read Marcy’s book. Anyone read his latest cowpie re “out-of-control special prosecutor” and his “freedom to pursue any supposed violation of the law, no matter how peripheral”? Even maggots have better taste than to gorge on his cowpies.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 51
I just unloaded the silverware out of the dishwasher and then wandered over the computer and hit “refresh”. Avoidance. I don’t know how you do it Christy but I’m in awe. I have a little boy who I think is the same age as your peanut and I find him completely exhausting!
Thinking Southerner @ 54
And PBS brings him in to sub for David Brookes. Fitting, huh? PBS & NPR lost it when shrub started appointing folks to the CPB.
petedownunder @ 10
To and from Australia? You win.
looseheadprop @ 50
Thanks for taking a look at that.
“”I am surprised, frankly, at the amount of distrust that exists …And I’m sorry it’s the case, and I’ll work hard to try to elevate it..”
Elevate; heightened, further, advance, intensify…
NOT
Alleviate; lessen, relieve, lighten, mitigate, assuage…
He thinks he’s so clever and the media would ignore it as another misspeak….and they did.
Thinking Southerner @ 54
Rich Lowry, Byron York, Jonah Goldberg and the rest of the bushbots at the National Review are already irrelevant. Like the VP, when have they been right on anything? Even William F. Buckley sees the writing on the wall and distanced himself. They have tied themselves to the U.S.S NeoCon and are going down with the ship.
TiredFed @ 52
thank you for keeping an eye on it for us all!
Thinking Southerner at 54 — Tha’s the new wingnut talking point on Fitzgerald. I got a call-in yesterday when I did the Tony Trupiano radio show from some wingnut mouthing that. My response: Did you want Patrick Fitzgerald to only investigate a little bit and potentially allow criminals to go free by treating a breach of national security as a not very important crime? No? Well, then stop griping that he did his job thoroughly.
As a former prosecutor myself, it seriously frosts me when anyone bitches about Fitzgerald thorougly doing his job. And it just shows how desperate they are to find anything for a smear — because the Republican Party has been all about locking everyone up for even the slightest offense for years. Except, of course, Republicans. Hypocrisy, much?
where in the hell are my manners ?!?!?
Good Morning Christy and Firedogs !
(lurking and otherwise)
Selise (and rumi if you missed it),
left some links about Mr. Drumheller downstairs – besides ‘the wrong speech’, seems some other things weren’t exactly well executed in the latter days of his tenure
actually had t/b away from live blogging yesterday due to previous commitments – you should’ve seen me in that first Internet Cafe – “spare me some dial-up man ?” -
but great to get home and see the wrapup – and bonus analysis from Pachacutec (egregious – did you catch the discussions in the youtube thread ?) abso-f’in-lutely fabulous – all of it is like sitting in the war rooms for both sides -
today will be my first day back at work – “yeah I know your inventory reports are due today, but move it sister, Matt Cooper’s on the stand!”
rumi @ 58
Thanks for bringing it up. Just from the opening paragraphs, it looks like it’s gonna be a doozy!
egregious @ 57
Eg – I do it every six weeks, it’s now like getting on the bus. What I think of as senility may just be permanent jet lag. At least you do yours for a good cause.
Good mornining all! Gotta run, but I’ll see ya when I get to work.
cbl 63, Christy, everyone.
Good morning and a good Judy to everyone today!
The coffee here is Hazelnut and the whole house smells like it but I’m still not awake.
‘Morning all and Thank you, Christy, for this truly historic service! (TYCFFTTHS) or, (TYC) for short. I mean it. Abreviation may just save time when things get hectic.
Re the MoveOn.Org Virtual March on Washington, there is also an unexpected opportunity to sign up to call your Rep/Sen in DC during business hours tomorrow. Seeing as how we’re all going to be around all day anyway (here, obsessively updating) why not make the two calls? Maybe we can shut down the switchboards or whatever…
http://pol.moveon.org/virtualm…..iredoglake
cbl @ 63
thanks for the heads up, will check downstairs. i can’t keep up with all the threads!
jymuluouuuluouu6jjyk666kkit66666666666666666666iiii666666juuyiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiyhhhhhho999999999999999999666666666959999i9i9i69696760780000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000n
(This is from Fiona, while Momma was picking up some toys in the living room. LOL — CHS)
Just finished the NYT. Compliments today for the piece they did on the trial (they got the Judy thing right this time; and some “color” reporting that has a certain Marcy feel to it. (Thanks Neil if you are reading this).
Also, at long LONG last, an excellent piece by Patricia Cohen (B1) on the recent trent to label “liberal Jews” i.e. who question Is*ael’s policy and the war as being anti-Semitic. The piece runs on B1 (1st page of the arts section) but it is a VERY good piece, bringing up the wife of Brandeis’ president where Carter spoke, and the provocative Walt & Mearsheimer paper on Isr*el. Thank you Patricia Cohen & the NYT for publishing this. But watch out for the letters to the editor excoriating the paper.
And the bad news: 2 articles (p.A10 and A10) seem to be pushing an early US military intervention in Iran. The first by basically supporting the admin view (and Iraq official??? view) of the Karbala incident.
And, of course, Thomas Friedman is as screwed up as ever on the M.E. in his op ed, claiming that Iran is the evil enemy. Argues against those who insis that solving the Is*ael-Pale*tinian conflict would transform the ME. His point is that Iran is the bigger problem here (What???). He sees them being the key architect of Islamic Jihad, Syria, Hamas, and Hezbo*lah. (What????). And Saudi Arabia – where are they? And wouldn’t something akin to Hamas and Hezbo*lah emerge to fight for Pale*tinian well being, were these two groups not in the fight (and with other money). He says we should negotiate (before fighting) Iran. But this after laying out a false case for war.
Christy and Annx:
The problem I see is that the USS Neocon is being welcomed into southern ports and the on deck sound system is repeatedly playing the tunes of those gasbag reicht-wing pundits. Very difficult to combat their sweeping tides down here.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 70
I agree 100 percent!
well now you’ve gone and embarassed Lowry . . .
Christy Hardin Smith @ 70
It is about Judy being the devil and now a cipher. Note the first 2 letters -jy, then all the flipped 6s and 9s followed by the Os. You have trained her well (and early)! :-}
Christy Hardin Smith @ 70
careful! that peanut will have her own blog soon!
buschco has it’s own interest at heart. anything to deplete the treasury while lining their pockets is their mantra and to hell with common folks.
Clearly, computers are fun. The Peanut already knows how to turn it on, select her icon, and get into the Disney games on their website to play her favorites, including the great Pooh Bear stuff. Amazing how quickly they pick this up, isn’t it?
NCBlueneck @ 53
Yeah, I had it on for a bit when I was driving over to visit my parents the night before last, and I had to switch it off or I was going to be hoarse by the time I got there.
Question here on another NYT piece. Maureen Dowd’s “Mama Hugs Iowa.” I am NO fan of Hilly, as you know. And love Dowd’s take down of Cheney. But why do I feel so uncomfortable with her treatment of other women. I think it is because with people like Bush and Cheney, she goes more for policy failures, and personality disorders. With women, it is more an issue of style… base catiness.
rumi — thanks for posting that el Masri v. Tenet case.
loosehead, Christy — I think they’re going to try to pull that same trick on this trial, using that stray comment yesterday about A Q Khan during Addington’s testimony.
One little tiny insertion and they will clamp it down.
kids with computers at home are at a GREAT advantage over kids who don’t….
revdeb & perris @ 21
Well, you’re right in essence, of course. I think he’s going to keep upping the ante, running wild, (invading, claiming Great Leader powers, looting the treasury, skimming as much cream for corps off as much privatizing & deregulating of agencies as possible) until somebody stops him.
But impeachment is a long long process, it takes ages to set up and get going, and everything else stops while it’s happening.
Did you see Waxman’s hearings yesterday? About the intimidation of scientists & censoring of findings at the FDA, EPA, NASA, etc? on global warming, pharmaceuticals, BIG time polluting and such…? The MSM actually reported it. Imagine that.
There is a confluence of events happening naturally, imo. the Libby trial, Waxman, Durbin on body armor, Feingold on presidential powers, Bushie’s claims that every agency works for him, plus every this and that in the book. It is all coming out.
This flow of information– at last!– is almost as effective as any formal proceeding, I think, since the point is to stop him & put him & his ilk out of power.
I’m more worried about Beltway moguls like Schumer, claiming credit for what other people did, supporting Bushesque things like national identity cards, and reaching out for top-down control of Democratic message and money.
You know I’m a newbie at FDL. But I’ve been lurking for ages, and what’s going on here, what you guys have built is, to my mind, just like the responses of Tester, Webb, Walz and the others to events. Congress failed–the media failed– and so smart, honest, competent people stepped up and took on the task of thinking clearly, organzing against corruption & abusive power and getting the fucking word out.
It’s working, you know. Maybe I’m having a particularly optimistic morning, I guess, but seems to me, this stepping forward– on all fronts, @ FDL, the DNC, from Fitgerald & the scientists & all the rest– is the real story of our day. The momentum is on our side now. All we have to do is sustain it against the surely gathering forces of reaction and keep going.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 70
I think she was transcribing Fredo’s last presser.
Late start today. Just saw a repeat on MSNBC of Imus’ earlier conversation with Col. Jack Jacobs. Imus calling Bush a coward and Chee-knee a war criminal and saying they can’t look wounded soldiers in the face because they know they sent them to their fate. Saying Fox News didn’t cover the San Antonio Intrepid rehabilitation center because of their own shame in shilling the war. [my paraphrase] War based on lies.
I hope MSNBC will post this videoclip on their website. People need to speak out or the status quo will never change.
Christy (78) — that’s an understatement…when my son was 3 (that’s 6 years ago), he was still having problems with potty training. I bribed him with the purchase of a movie; it had worked with his sister, after all. So son and I got on the computer, went to Amazon, found the movie he wanted. I pointed to it and told him, “Hey, Mom will buy that movie for you if you have a good week with no accidents.” He agreed and went off to play. I shut down the computer and went about my day.
The next afternoon I thought he was a bit too quiet; when I went to check on him, he’d turned on the computer, launched the browser software and gone to Amazon, and found the movie. Holy crap. He laughed and pointed to it and said, “Look, Mom, my movie!”
Damned good thing I didn’t have my credit card info on file at Amazon…
Prairie Sunshine @ 85
But Imus is offensive.
Thinking Southerner @ 54
I hope the wingers are prepared to explain how they’d favor letting organized crime bosses go free if their subordinates are willing to lie on the stand for them, rather than pursue “peripheral” violations.
Or why it was okay to prosecute (via impeachment because it would have been laughed out of any court in the land) this same “peripheral” violation against Clinton when there was no “underlying crime.”
Sadly for us, the mouth-breathers don’t require consistency in order to be convinced.
Rayne @ 86
That is great Rayne! I also like your parenting. Positive reinforcement, delayed gratification. Lucky kid you got.
Good morning Christy! Just wanted to say thanks for wading (sitting) thru all that crappola in service to your country.
My puzzel piece is this: What’s with the VP insisting that HE didn’t send Wilson? Wilson has been very clear all along that he was sent by the CIA.That’s what he wrote in his NYT op-ed, and has reiterated everytime someone asks. So WHY do we keep hearing in the media that “Joe Wilson said that he was sent at the request of the OVP” Even Nina Totenberg said so yesterday morning on NPR. (And will you tell her from me to stop that?) Was this accusation the only point of dispute the OVP could find to get the camels’ nose under the tent? You notice that their whole argument was about whether or not he was sent by the OVP, not whether a particular point of intellegence was correct. If they had had a better argument, or point of entry, wouldn’t they have used it? This is another thing that we need congress to investigate for us-unless Fitz comes thru and indicts someone for the actual crime of outing a covert agent. Lets not forget here that this trial has to be the first in a string, not the shiny little toy used to distract the rabble.
Have a great day, and I hope they fixed the heat!
Karbala -
we’ll just ignore the two 500lb gorillas
- no military left to play war
- 1 billion Chinese with long term energy delivery contracts with Iran
really, just pay no attention for the moment –
Gilliard -
Steve
Between Dick Durbin’s smackdown of the R’s, and Barack Obama introducing a bill calling for a definite withdrawal timetable, I’m thinking I’ve got two real good Senators in my new home!
Andy
Alton IL
rumi @ 46
Absolutely. Impeachment isn’t an ordinary criminal prosecution, “high crimes and misdemeanors” are not citations from the legal code, they’re whatever Congress says they are. If he tries to use secrecy to hide his crimes, they can turn around and impeach him for that.
rumi — you been following this story? I think that the Germans are going to send a message about our so-called state secrets…
Christy Hardin Smith @ 71
Oh yay! A Fiona-gram!!
More please!
This girl’s gonna turn into a first-class blogger. Like her mom.
Thinking Southerner @ 72
I agree it is frustrating that Lowry and the rest of the crew are welcomed on Sunday talk shows especially when we have a real lack of true progressives on the same programs. But I also think for the first time – the tide is turning. We are nowhere near there yet – but we are making progress, and blogs like FDL are a huge part of that.
Imus said something very interesting this morning. He was complaining about a lack of coverage of the center for disabled vets that opened in San Antonio. He said the media didn’t cover it because they are ashamed. It would be uncomfortable for reporters to look in the eyes of those wounded vets knowing they had failed so badly at their jobs. When Imus, a RW shill, says something like that – perhaps people are waking up.
as far as impeachment, while it might be true in the past government stopped, since we know the pitfalls we can place a calendar with an agenda
the trial would not stop government if we didn’t allow it to stop government
when a cake doesn’t taste good you change the ingredients, this is what we would need to do
anybody buying “the Iranians are killing Americans” meme that’s on the news these days?
even if it were true, who would believe them?
AAbshier @ 92
There is a U.S. Attorney who works in IL who is pretty good too.
My take is that it is in part a “shiny object” (i.e. something put in front to obfiscate the real issue – the outing of Plame). But more to the point, there seem to have been several things happening at once. The OVP seems to have asked for more information on the Niger uranium. CIA was asked to look into it; Valerie (who worked in non-proliferation) probably suggested they send Wilson because he knew Niger well having been the ambassador there. Another piece to this seems to have been the fact that the OVP – specifically Cheney – because they knew they had outed Plame (as is clear in the statements in this case), did not want to be anywhere near the Wilson Niger trip in the public mind, because then one might think he had some larger involvement (which of course he did).
I’ve now fully unloaded and reloaded my dishwasher so I have earned a right to send Fiona this message—
jjjjjjjjjjjjjjyyyyyyyyyyyyydora88888888888888thomasthetankengine000000000000000000tiggerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!
20 minutes until Judy time!
Redd – once the Peanut learns her letters, teach her to type her name (use great big letters)… the first time kids do that, they invariably clap their hands – cutest thing ever!
perris @ 8
I hope Congress has the balls to do it regardless if it permits Chimpy to think he was at ‘Victory’s door’. I want all of Congress to do the right thing immediatley!! The American public knows the score on this clusterfu** and history will show this war is (was) owned by Bush, Cheney et al.
annx,
did in fact Imus talk about ‘media and shame’ ?
then I missed that part and stand partially corrected on my comment (5:20am)upthread – but did he do the same w/McCain & Lieberman ?
looseheadprop @ 64
It goes into detail with previous case citations of the (4) points that are met for establishing privilege for state secrets and the legal precedent for protecting ind intl governments relationships with each other and with private corporations involved.
The worst part, as in el-Masri’s case, the court can find good reason to investigate damages to an individual but give priority to national security protection even if negligence and/or criminal activity are invloved…or ’sorry’bout your luck, dude’ The next worst is the judicial opinion of a long established weight given to the executive branch to claim this privilege.
Thanks for those links cbl.
Christy Hardin Smith @
62
I’ve gone back and re-read the transcript of the original Libby indictment news conference several times since the trial started (wapo has it in its entirety plus video clips). Really helps to counteract the kind of crap being slung by Lowry et al.
One comment by Fitzgerald during the q & a baseball analogy always jumps out @ me: “And the damage wasn’t to one person. It wasn’t just Valerie Wilson. It was done to all of us.” Personally, that’s the kind of prosecutorial attitude I want in the DOJ…
Portion of Editor & Publisher’s take on the trial (30 January).
“Note: Bloggers at FireDogLake.com in the courthouse have been providing an almost minute-by-minute report — not a transcript but very close paraphrasing, which has proven very accurate in the first days of the trial, so that is what we are relying on here. Other bloggers are doing the same and we check them to confirm accuracy.”
Take a bow, ladies.
How about putting down this challenge:
We will happily give you more power and authority when you start getting things right…as opposed to destroying everying you touch.
New Iraq Commander Spoke Up for Judith Miller
“…..Ms. Miller got to know General Petraeus in 2003, while she was embedded with a special military team seeking Iraq’s stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction. A story in the Washington Post said she came to enjoy such influence with the general that at one point she persuaded him to help rescind orders to pull back the reconnaissance unit…”
http://www.nysun.com/article/46518?page_no=1
Judy, judy, judy, has too many fingers in too many pies of the US Government. Who is she really?
Richmond @ 71
And even if that were true, we can’t possibly work on both, can we, Tom? The last six years have taught us a lot about the effectiveness of playing whack-a-mole on the “bigger” problem in the Middle East and ignoring the rest.
Sally @ 107
Better than a transcript b/c we have Marcie to point out lies, inconsistencies, ommissions and to add flavor, like calling the AG, Abu Gonzales, and mentioning when they went over Addington’s CV that they forgot the torture, unitary executive stuff.
OldCoastie (98) — exactly. The President couldn’t distinguish between Sunni and Shia (probably still can’t)…how’s he going to tell an Iranian citizen from a Kurdish Iraqi? Probably easier than Sunni/Shia, but still a stretch.
How would he tell a Turkish Kurd from an Iraqi Kurd, Syrian Kurd or Iranian Kurd, for that matter? If he’s already approved what is more or less “shoot first, questions later” policy on Iranians “interfering” with Iraq, couldn’t we end up pissing off the entire Kurdish people (something like 20 to 30 million people) just because it’s difficult to distinguish Kurdish citizens of Northern Iraq from Western Iranian Kurds?
Agh. I cannot believe how quickly this country has fallen into maelstrom. Only a dozen years and we are the scourge of the earth.
cbl @ 104
He did talk about media and shame (see Prairie Sunshine’s comment at 85 too), however I wouldn’t give him too much credit. Imus is mostly a RW shill who used to slobber over Bush, the same way he now slobbers over McCain and Lieberman. However, like sunshine breaking over a dung hill, occasionally the truth breaks through his usual shtick.
OC at 102 — Oh, we are way past the learning letters stage, and working on the writing our name stage. Will try typing it for her, though — she’ll love that. :)
CNN – Chimpy will be meeting with Speaker Pelosi today re: her trip to eyerak.
chica(go)dabears @ 109
She is an embedded Neo-con & Ideologue & war pusher. Here, alas, literally (if true, and if she said it, who knows). At some point, we may even find out that she was a spy (for a foreign government).
Every time he has McCain or Lieberman on he goes on and on about their postition on the war and how “NOBODY, NO-BOD-DEEE, in the world except you two believe this is going to work”.
cbl @ 104
Christy Hardin Smith @ 114
I think it is very empowering for little kids to do their name on their computer b/c they can do that before they have the fine motor to write it. My son, who is 3, knows the letter A, X, Y, Z and sometimes M. I have no idea why he knows those letters, very little progress on learning the other 21 letters. He knows every Thomas the Tank Engine train though.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 114
no, don’t type it for her – write the letters out (in caps so they match the keyboard) on a piece of paper (helps get the in order ;-), and then have her find them on the keyboard… help with the capital letter at the beginning… it’s a gas! Pick a font that is sans serif (comic sans works well) so that it “looks right”
perris @ 8
I think he will do that, and I think it’s the plan of many other Republicans, but I don’t think it’s his plan. I think he and Cheney are true believers, and can never believe they were wrong to go in, and have to keep going until they are proved right.
It’s a common neocon trait — “our plan doesn’t have the support of the people or knowledgeable experts, but we know we’re right, so if we just go ahead and do it by whatever underhanded means necessary, it’ll work out just like we say, and everyone will see then.”
The “Unitary Executive” theory is really just another name for the ancient “King With Advisors” form of government, widely used around the world for thousands of years in human history. The basic idea is that the King has the final authority and makes all the final decisions. He may consult with his advisors, but he is free to disregard their advice. He may look at the law, but he is not required to follow it. The role of the people is to go along quietly with whatever the King wants to do.
THE ESSENTIAL PROBLEM FOR US is that this Theory denies the authority of Congress, the Supreme Court, or anything else to interfere with the President’s performance of his functions, however he chooses. Thus Congress and the Supreme Court become merely Advisors, with no authority over the President.
That is Dictatorship, the very thing the American Revolution was fought to eliminate. Thus we see that the Unitary Executive Theory is a deviant theory, inherently anti-American, and has no place anywhere in our system of goverment.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 70
I was gonna say that! Well except for the ‘n’ at the end……pure genius I tells ya!
oh, and that’s VERY GOOD that she knows her letters already!
Imus is admittedly outloud an alcoholic in recovery. Recognize the traits?? However, because he is in recovery he can admit it’s a disease and he knows vets need the help.
Our president is NOT in recovery, which means that his brain, the denial will cause him to be very self centered, very emotional, very black and white in his cognitions and completely blind about his character defects. The effect of this will mean that he will do anything he can to avoid responsibility for his behavior and choices. It is a physical, emotional and spiritual illness. Nothing we can do to control his ability to “see” what is happening.
Our only option is to get him and his crew out of office…it will only get worse before it gets better. Anyone out there who has ever lived with the disease, knows that what I am saying is true. He will go and go, escalate and escalate until he hits rock bottom and god only knows what that might look like. Dry drunks have to hit rock bottom too, before they realize that they need help, confrontation, and the truth in order to be free of the disease.
He has to be stopped or this craziness will only escalate.
Rich Lowry –
’nuff said. . .
Yea, and he supported Kerry in the last election. Every time he has Mc Cain or Liberman on he tlaks about this “idiotic war” and the fact that, “nobody, no-bod-deee but you two and Bush think this thing is going to work”.
annx @ 113
all right – to the showers! gotta go teach some little kids to use the space bar today… (commonly known as the “hot dog key”)
OT…strange…CNN, in spite of the recent elections and Democratic majority, only seems to feature and interview Republican lawmakers. Did they not get the memo?
Rayne @ 94
Thanks for that one, too.
Yeah, I posted a link on early morning FDL and that got me to thinking backwards again.
Our DOJ wouldn’t hel Germany based on state secrets privilege and then this. A common factor to both the Masri decision and Germany’s action is the specific mention of private corporation involvement protection.
Am I banned? Two comments I just posted were eaten.
Here’s my problem with the Dems taking the gags out of their mouths, because I don’t think they’ve truly grown a pair of balls yet. Too much talk, not enough action. It seems to me that the President has done everything within imagination to needle this Congress, and yet they fail to smack him back. He now needs something akin to virtual corporal punishment, because in his view, each congresscritter has 1/535th of his power. He seems to see himself as the CEO and the congress as the worker bees, while the Supreme Court must be the board of directors. If they don’t smack him down, he’s going to go on running all over them like the spoiled child that he is. They need to, at the very least, censure him. I’m hoping that yesterday’s questions to Abu Gonzales were a prelude to impeachment of Abu. Then they need to start using those purse strings (I suggest they wrap them around the President’s balls,) or they’ll never regain the power that they have been allowing the Prez to usurp. It disgusts me that they are so enamored of politics that they refuse to follow Feingold to move toward censure or use their power of the purse for fear it may make Feingold look like more of a leader.
Imus also had Harry Connick Jr on this morning promoing his new CD, “NOLA”–Connick’s doing great stuff for reconstruction in New Orleans. Imus tossed him an opportunity softball to blame, but Connick backed off…not his style, doing what I can do, getting people back in houses.
Heroes usually come with baggage…so if you don’t like Imus, or whomever, heck don’t listen. But I give credit when someone’s willing to stand up.
The saudi’s are also killing americans over there but you don’t hear bush their seems to be no move to go to war with saudi??????????
Criminey!!
jymuluouuuluouu6jjyk666kkit6666666666666 6666666iiii666666juuyiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiyhh hhhho999999999999999999666666666959999i9 i9i6969676078000000000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000000000000n
(This is from Fiona, while Momma was picking up some toys in the living room. LOL — CHS)
Permit me to translate :
“My Mom and her website kick ASS and Mr ‘Dribby’ is gonna do hard time !!”
raven at 130 — I see them — try refreshing your screen. Your browser cache may be full and they may not be popping up for you.
I didn’t want to see Bush or Cheney at the dedication of the rehab center in San Antonio. I didn’t like seeing McCain and Clinton there. They should be ashamed, not embarrassed, that they are wholly or partly responsible for the missing limbs, burned bodies shown at the ceremony. I was thoroughly disgusted with the two presidential wannabes making political hay out of tragedy.
mrJJ @ 121
Exactly.
or at least a Foreign Agent
work, damn work.
I’ll be back.
Prairie Sunshine @ 131
Thank you! F*ckin A!
Richmond @
80
Hillary has a very large amount of support from people in my area of semi-rural Ohio, which brought me down a peg or two.
These people don’t know who Maureen Dowd is. They know who Hillary is.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 135
thx, on to the trial!
memo delivery services has been outsourced to DynCorp*g*
new thread
Glorfindel @ 128
No, they GOT the memo.
Sally @ 136
I’ll respectfully disagree in part with your take. We are at the mercy of who and what the MSM chooses to cover at events. Case in point, the rally in DC. Anti-war=Jane Fonda, et al. And ignore the antiwar soldiers or children. The Senators are Prez wannabes, yes, but they also sit on committees and our government needed to be there. Precisely because Bush and Chee-knee should be ashamed. And so should their political and media enablers.
Okay, gang — Marcy’s got her first liveblogging thread up and running. Thought everyone would like a heads up.
Sally @ 136
Yes, just another photo-op for the war whores. Big woop.
And they sould be ashamed of enabling this president’s power to wage war as he is determined to get us into a war with Iran and banking on the next president to have to deal with the consequences which, by that time, will likely involve a draft since we will have squeezed our military dry by then.
Stop the madness. Support the Feingold resolution.
BTW – we have another “peanut” on the way. The theme for the room is Peanuts. So everytime you mention “The Peanut” my mind pleasantly wanders a bit.
Congrats, Pat_AlexVA!! how wonderful for you!!
Christy Hardin Smith @
147
It’s a Love Blog! Just in time for Valentine’s Day!
Margot @ 141
GOD, I don’t want to have to vote for her! I think so many uninformed people probably believe she didn’t vote for the war and pimp it like she did simply because she is criticizing it now.
Of course, I have to put it all in perspective, measuring her against the idiot madman we have now. Still, don’t think she would win, I really don’t.
And I despise Dowd’s treatment of women in power as well. Whenever she writes about them, it’s more just plain silly cattiness than substance. I can only attribute it to petty jealousy. It’s so obvious and it is beneath someone as talented as she is.
Phoenix oman at 151 — Ooops! Damn tyops. *g* Thanks for the heads up — it’s fixed.
Pat_AlexVA @ 149
CONGRATULATIONS!!
Am very happy for you.
You must ‘get it’ by now. That’s how Dubya’s mom and dad raised him — to be an immature jackass. The petulant bubble boy has NO IDEA of what’s occuring in the country. None. He’s a bigger danger to the world sitting in the oval office. But he’s the best that his over-rated dad’s money can buy.
Where are the democrats? Why aren’t they moving and shaking and rattling the cages?
to imply that this president was elected is a gross misstatement
let us try to stick to the facts. this appointee was not elected, it was rammed through by political tools on both occasions, with what we know to be defective election devices, and criminal activity by numerous persons known, and unknown
oldtree at 156 — I’ve been writing my first story of the morning at around 10:30 at night after a long day of making sure the blog is running properly. Cut me some slack — the point of the article was not a precise analysis of electoral problems, it was a dissection of public narratives.
Thanks Rayne & Egregious, we’re coming down the final stretch… The way the Judy testimony is going, the baby might come before the trial end.
If words are so inconsequential, the Dems should just start greeting the President with “Hi, Crap-for-Brains. How are you?”
Each time we get our asses kicked that PROVES it was Iran!
Ah yes, Bush at the Alfalfa Club, suits him well.
I follow the court action and see the deliberate lies come out and wonder: Clinton looked up a girl’s skirt and got keel-hauled over the Senate(?) floor. After all this creep has done, he personally is getting not much more than a rap over the knuckles by comparison. How far does it go before someone has the balls to shout the I word? Oh, I get it. Impeach him, and who are we left with…? Oh, well, maybe after the trial, they’ll all be gone!
Thanks for the Veteran link, Jane. Posted on my own blog as well. “Powerful” indeed.
oldtree 156 & Christy 157
too much pain on both sides of that discourse for it to settle well….
oldtree: Christy has never stepped back one inch from fighting to right the wrongs of this awful administration.
I, like you, will never accept bush as an elected president. I also feel the office was flat-out stolen – TWICE!, with complicity from a tainted supreme court.
Even though I will never change my mind about those issues, I accept the fact that we must broaden our discussion in order to work out solutions to the many problems these horrible people have caused for the US, and the whole world.
No one is working harder at this than Christy. When she writes, I always find it worth reading what she has to say. Never have I known her to stifle discussion.
So let’s keep trying to work together, ‘kay?