<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lunchtime Treats A La Libby</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/31/lunchtime-treats-a-la-libby/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/31/lunchtime-treats-a-la-libby/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:12:01 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rat</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/31/lunchtime-treats-a-la-libby/#comment-485736</link>
		<dc:creator>rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 03:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/31/lunchtime-treats-a-la-libby/#comment-485736</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-485544&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Richmond @&lt;br /&gt;
                118              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oi&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-485390&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;rat @ 117 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-484796&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Hugh @&lt;br /&gt;
                                                             47              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ted Koppel the former host of ABC’s Nightline had a commentary today on NPR.  He said that the Bush Administration was dishonest when it said that the reason we were in Iraq was to help the Iraqi people.  It was, in fact, about oil.  Koppel then turned around and slammed those who wished to withdraw our troops because he said that this would endanger oil production and flow in the region.     &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;…… &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This leaves Koppel’s commentary with the single point that Iraq was and is about oil.  I hate to tell you, Ted, but we kind of knew that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yep, I listened to that too.  IMHO, Koppel is pretty much washed up anymore.  He might have influence, but he lacks much in substance anymore.  Not sure if you heard his pieces from when he reported on Iran a few months back, but much of what he discussed sounded more like Bush administration propoganda than any sort of balanced reporting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry, but Koppel gets no vote of confidence from me either.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By the way, check this too … more on “it’s about the oil.”  Only this is a bit more current.  Not sure just how closely some are following.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article2132569.ece&quot;&gt;Independent__UK&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oil AND Armament sales AND Isr*el - as Mr. Koppel knows very well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Exactly.   I fear we are seeing more of the cherry-picking of intel again, not to mention selective use of media outlets.  As Yogi Berra  might say, “It’s deja vu all over again.” &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One can only hope we’ll start to see more definitive reporting on this new (and related) development as well.  Particularly in light of the clear evidence of smear / deception tactics going into Iraq and as brought to light in this trial.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well, a girl can dream, can’t she?  If it is a dream,, don’t wake me up! :-P&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-485544"><em>Richmond @<br />
                118              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Oi<a href="#comment-485390"><em>rat @ 117 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-484796"><em>Hugh @<br />
                                                             47              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Ted Koppel the former host of ABC’s Nightline had a commentary today on NPR.  He said that the Bush Administration was dishonest when it said that the reason we were in Iraq was to help the Iraqi people.  It was, in fact, about oil.  Koppel then turned around and slammed those who wished to withdraw our troops because he said that this would endanger oil production and flow in the region.     </p>
<p>…… </p>
<p>This leaves Koppel’s commentary with the single point that Iraq was and is about oil.  I hate to tell you, Ted, but we kind of knew that.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yep, I listened to that too.  IMHO, Koppel is pretty much washed up anymore.  He might have influence, but he lacks much in substance anymore.  Not sure if you heard his pieces from when he reported on Iran a few months back, but much of what he discussed sounded more like Bush administration propoganda than any sort of balanced reporting.</p>
<p>Sorry, but Koppel gets no vote of confidence from me either.</p>
<p>By the way, check this too … more on “it’s about the oil.”  Only this is a bit more current.  Not sure just how closely some are following.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article2132569.ece">Independent__UK</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Oil AND Armament sales AND Isr*el &#8211; as Mr. Koppel knows very well.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Exactly.   I fear we are seeing more of the cherry-picking of intel again, not to mention selective use of media outlets.  As Yogi Berra  might say, “It’s deja vu all over again.” </p>
<p>One can only hope we’ll start to see more definitive reporting on this new (and related) development as well.  Particularly in light of the clear evidence of smear / deception tactics going into Iraq and as brought to light in this trial.</p>
<p>Well, a girl can dream, can’t she?  If it is a dream,, don’t wake me up! :-P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richmond</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/31/lunchtime-treats-a-la-libby/#comment-485544</link>
		<dc:creator>Richmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/31/lunchtime-treats-a-la-libby/#comment-485544</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oi&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-485390&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;rat @ 117 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-484796&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Hugh @&lt;br /&gt;
                                                             47              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ted Koppel the former host of ABC’s Nightline had a commentary today on NPR.  He said that the Bush Administration was dishonest when it said that the reason we were in Iraq was to help the Iraqi people.  It was, in fact, about oil.  Koppel then turned around and slammed those who wished to withdraw our troops because he said that this would endanger oil production and flow in the region.     &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;…… &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This leaves Koppel’s commentary with the single point that Iraq was and is about oil.  I hate to tell you, Ted, but we kind of knew that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yep, I listened to that too.  IMHO, Koppel is pretty much washed up anymore.  He might have influence, but he lacks much in substance anymore.  Not sure if you heard his pieces from when he reported on Iran a few months back, but much of what he discussed sounded more like Bush administration propoganda than any sort of balanced reporting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry, but Koppel gets no vote of confidence from me either.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By the way, check this too … more on “it’s about the oil.”  Only this is a bit more current.  Not sure just how closely some are following.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article2132569.ece&quot;&gt;Independent__UK&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oil AND Armament sales AND Isr*el - as Mr. Koppel knows very well.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oi<a href="#comment-485390"><em>rat @ 117 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-484796"><em>Hugh @<br />
                                                             47              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Ted Koppel the former host of ABC’s Nightline had a commentary today on NPR.  He said that the Bush Administration was dishonest when it said that the reason we were in Iraq was to help the Iraqi people.  It was, in fact, about oil.  Koppel then turned around and slammed those who wished to withdraw our troops because he said that this would endanger oil production and flow in the region.     </p>
<p>…… </p>
<p>This leaves Koppel’s commentary with the single point that Iraq was and is about oil.  I hate to tell you, Ted, but we kind of knew that.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yep, I listened to that too.  IMHO, Koppel is pretty much washed up anymore.  He might have influence, but he lacks much in substance anymore.  Not sure if you heard his pieces from when he reported on Iran a few months back, but much of what he discussed sounded more like Bush administration propoganda than any sort of balanced reporting.</p>
<p>Sorry, but Koppel gets no vote of confidence from me either.</p>
<p>By the way, check this too … more on “it’s about the oil.”  Only this is a bit more current.  Not sure just how closely some are following.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article2132569.ece">Independent__UK</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Oil AND Armament sales AND Isr*el &#8211; as Mr. Koppel knows very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rat</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/31/lunchtime-treats-a-la-libby/#comment-485390</link>
		<dc:creator>rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/31/lunchtime-treats-a-la-libby/#comment-485390</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-484796&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Hugh @&lt;br /&gt;
                                                             47              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ted Koppel the former host of ABC’s Nightline had a commentary today on NPR.  He said that the Bush Administration was dishonest when it said that the reason we were in Iraq was to help the Iraqi people.  It was, in fact, about oil.  Koppel then turned around and slammed those who wished to withdraw our troops because he said that this would endanger oil production and flow in the region.     &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;…… &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This leaves Koppel’s commentary with the single point that Iraq was and is about oil.  I hate to tell you, Ted, but we kind of knew that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yep, I listened to that too.  IMHO, Koppel is pretty much washed up anymore.  He might have influence, but he lacks much in substance anymore.  Not sure if you heard his pieces from when he reported on Iran a few months back, but much of what he discussed sounded more like Bush administration propoganda than any sort of balanced reporting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry, but Koppel gets no vote of confidence from me either.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By the way, check this too … more on “it’s about the oil.”  Only this is a bit more current.  Not sure just how closely some are following.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article2132569.ece&quot;&gt;Independent__UK&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-484796"><em>Hugh @<br />
                                                             47              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Ted Koppel the former host of ABC’s Nightline had a commentary today on NPR.  He said that the Bush Administration was dishonest when it said that the reason we were in Iraq was to help the Iraqi people.  It was, in fact, about oil.  Koppel then turned around and slammed those who wished to withdraw our troops because he said that this would endanger oil production and flow in the region.     </p>
<p>…… </p>
<p>This leaves Koppel’s commentary with the single point that Iraq was and is about oil.  I hate to tell you, Ted, but we kind of knew that.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yep, I listened to that too.  IMHO, Koppel is pretty much washed up anymore.  He might have influence, but he lacks much in substance anymore.  Not sure if you heard his pieces from when he reported on Iran a few months back, but much of what he discussed sounded more like Bush administration propoganda than any sort of balanced reporting.</p>
<p>Sorry, but Koppel gets no vote of confidence from me either.</p>
<p>By the way, check this too … more on “it’s about the oil.”  Only this is a bit more current.  Not sure just how closely some are following.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article2132569.ece">Independent__UK</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adie</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/31/lunchtime-treats-a-la-libby/#comment-485132</link>
		<dc:creator>Adie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/31/lunchtime-treats-a-la-libby/#comment-485132</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-484981&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Richmond @&lt;br /&gt;
                113              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-484938&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;lectric lady @ 107&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The picture is entitled “hamster”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Remember please, at the lake, if you have to actually read something to find out the answer, it is called cheating. :-}  (Literacy is a wonderful thing if you use it)!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;okay - sure is a cute little fella, whatever he/she is and, like me, could probably use a few extra turns on the wheel instead of scarfing down more biscuits ;-&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;on literature note, be cautious - just ’cause it’s in print doesn’t mean it’s necessarily true.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;go google a critter you know well, &amp; click on “images”, &amp; look at all the wrong titles that pop up.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-484981"><em>Richmond @<br />
                113              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-484938"><em>lectric lady @ 107</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>The picture is entitled “hamster”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Remember please, at the lake, if you have to actually read something to find out the answer, it is called cheating. :-}  (Literacy is a wonderful thing if you use it)!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>okay &#8211; sure is a cute little fella, whatever he/she is and, like me, could probably use a few extra turns on the wheel instead of scarfing down more biscuits ;-&gt;</p>
<p>on literature note, be cautious &#8211; just ’cause it’s in print doesn’t mean it’s necessarily true.</p>
<p>go google a critter you know well, &amp; click on “images”, &amp; look at all the wrong titles that pop up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/31/lunchtime-treats-a-la-libby/#comment-485009</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/31/lunchtime-treats-a-la-libby/#comment-485009</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am not surprised about the wait for VA treatment. I to am a disabled vet.(100% disability from service 1968 to 1980) the VA greatly improved under Clinton, but has fallen on hard times lately. I have to see a Dr at my own expense for my hearing problems(2 hearing aids) as the VA no longer has anyone local who can do any thing. Trying to see a specialist is quite difficult due to the large numbers of people and shortage of Dr and space. I get VA dental service, and until recently it took over a year yo get an apointment. I needed to get a tooth pulled and my apt was for 6 months later. I took the $300 hit and had a outside dentist take care of it. Don’t get me wrong, both myself and my wife think that VA treatment is fantastic-my wife was in the ER twice for food poisoning, ER doc’s were right there and very knowledgeable, but getting a routine apt is hard. I have spent much time waiting and talking to others in the system. We are all agreed that gwb has not funded the VA the way that he should. He has vastly underfunded the system, to the point that in order to get rehab for our new vets, the govt refused to fund(private funds did) the new rehab center at Fort Sam’s Brook Army Medical Center-it was all over national TV when it opened-but the big question was never asked or answered by gwb. Why did it take private funds to get the rehab instead of govt funds. The repigs always say that they are for the troops, well they are, but only as long as they don’t have to spend money. If not for the owner of an empty bldg here in San Antonio giving a floor to the VA to use as a dental clinic, I would still be going to my dentist in the VA hospital, where each dentist room was all of about 5 feet wide, and 15 feet wide. A dentist, the asst. and me in the chair, very tight space. And it had been like this for years. A VA hosp about 60 miles north of here in Kerrville Tx, is mostly empty as they are not able to hire new Dr’s when the ones they have leave or retire, so they are sent to SA, as are all in the Rio Grande valley. The only way it works at all is the fact that there is a medical school here, and the Dr’s there, and from University hosp across the street come over to the VA hosp and work for free. You get the picture?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not surprised about the wait for VA treatment. I to am a disabled vet.(100% disability from service 1968 to 1980) the VA greatly improved under Clinton, but has fallen on hard times lately. I have to see a Dr at my own expense for my hearing problems(2 hearing aids) as the VA no longer has anyone local who can do any thing. Trying to see a specialist is quite difficult due to the large numbers of people and shortage of Dr and space. I get VA dental service, and until recently it took over a year yo get an apointment. I needed to get a tooth pulled and my apt was for 6 months later. I took the $300 hit and had a outside dentist take care of it. Don’t get me wrong, both myself and my wife think that VA treatment is fantastic-my wife was in the ER twice for food poisoning, ER doc’s were right there and very knowledgeable, but getting a routine apt is hard. I have spent much time waiting and talking to others in the system. We are all agreed that gwb has not funded the VA the way that he should. He has vastly underfunded the system, to the point that in order to get rehab for our new vets, the govt refused to fund(private funds did) the new rehab center at Fort Sam’s Brook Army Medical Center-it was all over national TV when it opened-but the big question was never asked or answered by gwb. Why did it take private funds to get the rehab instead of govt funds. The repigs always say that they are for the troops, well they are, but only as long as they don’t have to spend money. If not for the owner of an empty bldg here in San Antonio giving a floor to the VA to use as a dental clinic, I would still be going to my dentist in the VA hospital, where each dentist room was all of about 5 feet wide, and 15 feet wide. A dentist, the asst. and me in the chair, very tight space. And it had been like this for years. A VA hosp about 60 miles north of here in Kerrville Tx, is mostly empty as they are not able to hire new Dr’s when the ones they have leave or retire, so they are sent to SA, as are all in the Rio Grande valley. The only way it works at all is the fact that there is a medical school here, and the Dr’s there, and from University hosp across the street come over to the VA hosp and work for free. You get the picture?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richmond</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/31/lunchtime-treats-a-la-libby/#comment-484995</link>
		<dc:creator>Richmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/31/lunchtime-treats-a-la-libby/#comment-484995</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-484865&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Rayne @ 98 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;litigatormom — the reason you’re not seeing Bush stumbling like Ford, sweating like a paranoid freak like Nixon, bumbling like Reagan, batting at bunnies like Carter, being a bubba like Clinton is the very reason we are seeing the Press staff of the administration and media figures on the stand.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Bush administration owns the media.  And that means the boss does whatever he wants without any worries that he’ll be portrayed in a bad light, except on a couple shows on late night television after the most frequent and reliable voters have already snogged off to see the Sand Man.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[sigh]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Absolutely Raine!! That in many ways is the worst of this whole things. The founding fathers expected corrupt Presidents, Congress People and Judiciary and planned accordingly with checks and balances. But the Media is something new altogether - and in many ways the most difficult to counter.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-484865"><em>Rayne @ 98 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>litigatormom — the reason you’re not seeing Bush stumbling like Ford, sweating like a paranoid freak like Nixon, bumbling like Reagan, batting at bunnies like Carter, being a bubba like Clinton is the very reason we are seeing the Press staff of the administration and media figures on the stand.</p>
<p>The Bush administration owns the media.  And that means the boss does whatever he wants without any worries that he’ll be portrayed in a bad light, except on a couple shows on late night television after the most frequent and reliable voters have already snogged off to see the Sand Man.</p>
<p>[sigh]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Absolutely Raine!! That in many ways is the worst of this whole things. The founding fathers expected corrupt Presidents, Congress People and Judiciary and planned accordingly with checks and balances. But the Media is something new altogether &#8211; and in many ways the most difficult to counter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richmond</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/31/lunchtime-treats-a-la-libby/#comment-484981</link>
		<dc:creator>Richmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/31/lunchtime-treats-a-la-libby/#comment-484981</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-484938&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;lectric lady @ 107&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The picture is entitled “hamster”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Remember please, at the lake, if you have to actually read something to find out the answer, it is called cheating. :-}  (Literacy is a wonderful thing if you use it)!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-484938"><em>lectric lady @ 107</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>The picture is entitled “hamster”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Remember please, at the lake, if you have to actually read something to find out the answer, it is called cheating. :-}  (Literacy is a wonderful thing if you use it)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adie</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/31/lunchtime-treats-a-la-libby/#comment-484946</link>
		<dc:creator>Adie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/31/lunchtime-treats-a-la-libby/#comment-484946</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;but then, the guineapig our kids used to have sure was a cutie, so….&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but then, the guineapig our kids used to have sure was a cutie, so….</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adie</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/31/lunchtime-treats-a-la-libby/#comment-484944</link>
		<dc:creator>Adie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/31/lunchtime-treats-a-la-libby/#comment-484944</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;googled’n&#039;googled s’more:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My gamblin’ money is on designer GERBIL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Longer hair, &amp; different color than wild-type, but they’ve been domesticated long long time, with color &amp; longer hair being a favorite thing people seem to want to change when they get started messin’ wit’ muddernature.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gerbil’s the only one with that cute a nose &amp; nice BIG eyes.  Both guinea pigs &amp; chinchillas have broader skull &amp;, ahem, less diminutive schnozola.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Go search for yerself &amp; see whatcha come up with.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;s’cuse while I refresh. then I’ll be right up with the good students upstairs, sitting primly at my desk &amp; reading every word. ;-&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>googled’n&#8217;googled s’more:</p>
<p>My gamblin’ money is on designer GERBIL.</p>
<p>Longer hair, &amp; different color than wild-type, but they’ve been domesticated long long time, with color &amp; longer hair being a favorite thing people seem to want to change when they get started messin’ wit’ muddernature.</p>
<p>Gerbil’s the only one with that cute a nose &amp; nice BIG eyes.  Both guinea pigs &amp; chinchillas have broader skull &amp;, ahem, less diminutive schnozola.</p>
<p>Go search for yerself &amp; see whatcha come up with.</p>
<p>s’cuse while I refresh. then I’ll be right up with the good students upstairs, sitting primly at my desk &amp; reading every word. ;-&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lectric lady</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/31/lunchtime-treats-a-la-libby/#comment-484938</link>
		<dc:creator>lectric lady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/31/lunchtime-treats-a-la-libby/#comment-484938</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The picture is entitled “hamster”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The picture is entitled “hamster”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
