<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Libby Live: Judy Three</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/30/libby-live-judy-three/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/30/libby-live-judy-three/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:01:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: medaka</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/30/libby-live-judy-three/#comment-484302</link>
		<dc:creator>medaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/30/libby-live-judy-three/#comment-484302</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-483343&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;watertiger @ 133 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Judy’s next move should be toward musical theater.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Or performance art.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;YES!! an NEA grant, and then&lt;br /&gt;
a basketful of yams&lt;br /&gt;
and speculums for Judy!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and then defund her!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-483343"><em>watertiger @ 133 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><i>Judy’s next move should be toward musical theater.</i></p>
<p>Or performance art.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>YES!! an NEA grant, and then<br />
a basketful of yams<br />
and speculums for Judy!</p>
<p>and then defund her!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: parrot</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/30/libby-live-judy-three/#comment-484196</link>
		<dc:creator>parrot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 06:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/30/libby-live-judy-three/#comment-484196</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great coverage and very entertaining!  I’m going to look into this book thing of which there has been much mention.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On a heavier note–what if Libby was trying to protect others and they all hung him out to dry…including Miller?  If Miller’s stalling tactics were never really about Libby but were about someone else, a lot of what has been going on makes sense.  Not that that protects Libby from any of the charges he now faces…since they are not actually about the leak itself.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If this theory is correct then Fitzgerald’s decision to simply prosecute on perjury is brilliant since he can start going after anyone who lied as the conspirators cop pleas…without caring whether they actually can be proved to have broken the 82 Act or not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course, that theory would presuppose that all the players in the conspiracy have actually been deposed and committed perjury…which I’m beginning to suspect is not the case…so if Fitzgerald’s office starts deposing new players, that would be an indication that he is following that track.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great coverage and very entertaining!  I’m going to look into this book thing of which there has been much mention.</p>
<p>On a heavier note–what if Libby was trying to protect others and they all hung him out to dry…including Miller?  If Miller’s stalling tactics were never really about Libby but were about someone else, a lot of what has been going on makes sense.  Not that that protects Libby from any of the charges he now faces…since they are not actually about the leak itself.</p>
<p>If this theory is correct then Fitzgerald’s decision to simply prosecute on perjury is brilliant since he can start going after anyone who lied as the conspirators cop pleas…without caring whether they actually can be proved to have broken the 82 Act or not.</p>
<p>Of course, that theory would presuppose that all the players in the conspiracy have actually been deposed and committed perjury…which I’m beginning to suspect is not the case…so if Fitzgerald’s office starts deposing new players, that would be an indication that he is following that track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaleidescope</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/30/libby-live-judy-three/#comment-484138</link>
		<dc:creator>kaleidescope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 05:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/30/libby-live-judy-three/#comment-484138</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What was great about Jimi Hendrix as a guitarist was that he set a new standard for electric guitar.  Through his creative and technical virtuosity, Hendrix brought to fore a new universe of music.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And that’s what you’ve done, emptywheel.  You’re the Jimi Hendrix of live blogging.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was great about Jimi Hendrix as a guitarist was that he set a new standard for electric guitar.  Through his creative and technical virtuosity, Hendrix brought to fore a new universe of music.</p>
<p>And that’s what you’ve done, emptywheel.  You’re the Jimi Hendrix of live blogging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles Archer</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/30/libby-live-judy-three/#comment-484130</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles Archer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 05:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/30/libby-live-judy-three/#comment-484130</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Judy on Digital Age with James Goodale. GJ discussioni starts at minute 23.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8203656088628723745&amp;q=judith&quot;&gt;http://video.google.com/videop.....p;q=judith&lt;/a&gt; miller digital age&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judy on Digital Age with James Goodale. GJ discussioni starts at minute 23.<br />
<a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8203656088628723745&amp;q=judith">http://video.google.com/videop&#8230;..p;q=judith</a> miller digital age</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cinnamonape</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/30/libby-live-judy-three/#comment-484124</link>
		<dc:creator>cinnamonape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 04:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/30/libby-live-judy-three/#comment-484124</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Here is a nice TITLED LIST of links to the Governments and Libby Defense Submitted Exhibits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/plame/trial_evidence.html&quot;&gt;LIBBY TRIAL EXHIBITS/DOCUMENTS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I noticed that nothing related to the testimony and exhibits that were used in the Judy Miller examination is on there yet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Frustrating…because I so, so, so wanted to see if she put a little accent  above the  at the end of Valerie Flam.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a nice TITLED LIST of links to the Governments and Libby Defense Submitted Exhibits.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/plame/trial_evidence.html">LIBBY TRIAL EXHIBITS/DOCUMENTS</a></p>
<p>I noticed that nothing related to the testimony and exhibits that were used in the Judy Miller examination is on there yet.</p>
<p>Frustrating…because I so, so, so wanted to see if she put a little accent  above the  at the end of Valerie Flam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cinnamonape</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/30/libby-live-judy-three/#comment-483970</link>
		<dc:creator>cinnamonape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 03:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/30/libby-live-judy-three/#comment-483970</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-483701&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mason @&lt;br /&gt;
                251              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-483628&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;mrJJ @ 245&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;A Blast from the past…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bush Directed Cheney To Counter War Critic&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;President Bush told the special prosecutor in the CIA leak case that he directed Vice President Dick Cheney to personally lead an effort to counter allegations made by former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV that his administration had misrepresented intelligence information to make the case to go to war with Iraq, according to people familiar with the president’s interview. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bush also told federal prosecutors during his June 24, 2004, interview in the Oval Office that he had directed Cheney, as part of that broader effort, to disclose highly classified intelligence information that would not only defend his administration but also discredit Wilson, the sources said. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But Bush told investigators that he was unaware that Cheney had directed I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, the vice president’s chief of staff, to covertly leak the classified information to the media instead of releasing it to the public after undergoing the formal governmental declassification processes. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bush also said during his interview with prosecutors that he had never directed anyone to disclose the identity of then-covert CIA officer Valerie Plame, Wilson’s wife. Bush said he had no information that Cheney had disclosed Plame’s identity or directed anyone else to do so. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0703nj1.htm&quot;&gt;http://news.nationaljournal.co.....703nj1.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wow, this is a smoking gun! I don’t believe that I read this before you posted it here. Given what we now know about the scope of the disinformation and lying by this criminal administration to garner support for invading Iraq, Bush must have specifically ordered Cheney to undertake a campaign to discredit Joe Wilson because he knew Wilson was telling the truth.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have assumed that Bush was behind the effort to discredit Wilson because it’s the kind of mean-spirited and unnecessary thing that he would do and I’ve never believed that anyone in his administration would have done it on their own.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The plot thickens, don’t it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VP Notes after Libby Meeting: “…Not going to protect one staffer and sacrifice the guy &lt;strike&gt;the Pres.&lt;/strike&gt; asked to stick his neck in the meat grinder because of the incompetance of others …,” :) :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;THE PRES = THE PRESIDENT &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bush asked Libby to doi more than simply go through normal channels to declassify parts of the NIE!!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He asked him to put his neck in the guillotine! I guess he didn’t actually like martyrdom after all!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wid.ap.org/documents/libbytrial/jan30/GX53201.PDF&quot;&gt;http://wid.ap.org/documents/li.....X53201.PDF&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-483701"><em>Mason @<br />
                251              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-483628"><em>mrJJ @ 245</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>A Blast from the past…</p>
<p>Bush Directed Cheney To Counter War Critic</p>
<p>President Bush told the special prosecutor in the CIA leak case that he directed Vice President Dick Cheney to personally lead an effort to counter allegations made by former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV that his administration had misrepresented intelligence information to make the case to go to war with Iraq, according to people familiar with the president’s interview. </p>
<p>Bush also told federal prosecutors during his June 24, 2004, interview in the Oval Office that he had directed Cheney, as part of that broader effort, to disclose highly classified intelligence information that would not only defend his administration but also discredit Wilson, the sources said. </p>
<p>But Bush told investigators that he was unaware that Cheney had directed I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, the vice president’s chief of staff, to covertly leak the classified information to the media instead of releasing it to the public after undergoing the formal governmental declassification processes. </p>
<p>Bush also said during his interview with prosecutors that he had never directed anyone to disclose the identity of then-covert CIA officer Valerie Plame, Wilson’s wife. Bush said he had no information that Cheney had disclosed Plame’s identity or directed anyone else to do so. </p>
<p><a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0703nj1.htm">http://news.nationaljournal.co&#8230;..703nj1.htm</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Wow, this is a smoking gun! I don’t believe that I read this before you posted it here. Given what we now know about the scope of the disinformation and lying by this criminal administration to garner support for invading Iraq, Bush must have specifically ordered Cheney to undertake a campaign to discredit Joe Wilson because he knew Wilson was telling the truth.</p>
<p>I have assumed that Bush was behind the effort to discredit Wilson because it’s the kind of mean-spirited and unnecessary thing that he would do and I’ve never believed that anyone in his administration would have done it on their own.</p>
<p>The plot thickens, don’t it?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>VP Notes after Libby Meeting: “…Not going to protect one staffer and sacrifice the guy <strike>the Pres.</strike> asked to stick his neck in the meat grinder because of the incompetance of others …,” :) :)</p>
<p>THE PRES = THE PRESIDENT </p>
<p>Bush asked Libby to doi more than simply go through normal channels to declassify parts of the NIE!!!</p>
<p>He asked him to put his neck in the guillotine! I guess he didn’t actually like martyrdom after all!</p>
<p><a href="http://wid.ap.org/documents/libbytrial/jan30/GX53201.PDF">http://wid.ap.org/documents/li&#8230;..X53201.PDF</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cinnamonape</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/30/libby-live-judy-three/#comment-483955</link>
		<dc:creator>cinnamonape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 03:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/30/libby-live-judy-three/#comment-483955</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-483701&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mason @&lt;br /&gt;
                251              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-483628&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;mrJJ @ 245&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;A Blast from the past…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bush Directed Cheney To Counter War Critic&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;President Bush told the special prosecutor in the CIA leak case that he directed Vice President Dick Cheney to personally lead an effort to counter allegations made by former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV that his administration had misrepresented intelligence information to make the case to go to war with Iraq, according to people familiar with the president’s interview. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bush also told federal prosecutors during his June 24, 2004, interview in the Oval Office that he had directed Cheney, as part of that broader effort, to disclose highly classified intelligence information that would not only defend his administration but also discredit Wilson, the sources said. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But Bush told investigators that he was unaware that Cheney had directed I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, the vice president’s chief of staff, to covertly leak the classified information to the media instead of releasing it to the public after undergoing the formal governmental declassification processes. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bush also said during his interview with prosecutors that he had never directed anyone to disclose the identity of then-covert CIA officer Valerie Plame, Wilson’s wife. Bush said he had no information that Cheney had disclosed Plame’s identity or directed anyone else to do so. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0703nj1.htm&quot;&gt;http://news.nationaljournal.co.....703nj1.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wow, this is a smoking gun! I don’t believe that I read this before you posted it here. Given what we now know about the scope of the disinformation and lying by this criminal administration to garner support for invading Iraq, Bush must have specifically ordered Cheney to undertake a campaign to discredit Joe Wilson because he knew Wilson was telling the truth.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have assumed that Bush was behind the effort to discredit Wilson because it’s the kind of mean-spirited and unnecessary thing that he would do and I’ve never believed that anyone in his administration would have done it on their own.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The plot thickens, don’t it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VP Notes after Libby Meeting: “…sacrifice the guy [this President] asked to stick his neck in the meat grinder …,” :) :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wid.ap.org/documents/libbytrial/jan30/GX53201.PDF&quot;&gt;http://wid.ap.org/documents/li.....X53201.PDF&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-483701"><em>Mason @<br />
                251              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-483628"><em>mrJJ @ 245</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>A Blast from the past…</p>
<p>Bush Directed Cheney To Counter War Critic</p>
<p>President Bush told the special prosecutor in the CIA leak case that he directed Vice President Dick Cheney to personally lead an effort to counter allegations made by former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV that his administration had misrepresented intelligence information to make the case to go to war with Iraq, according to people familiar with the president’s interview. </p>
<p>Bush also told federal prosecutors during his June 24, 2004, interview in the Oval Office that he had directed Cheney, as part of that broader effort, to disclose highly classified intelligence information that would not only defend his administration but also discredit Wilson, the sources said. </p>
<p>But Bush told investigators that he was unaware that Cheney had directed I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, the vice president’s chief of staff, to covertly leak the classified information to the media instead of releasing it to the public after undergoing the formal governmental declassification processes. </p>
<p>Bush also said during his interview with prosecutors that he had never directed anyone to disclose the identity of then-covert CIA officer Valerie Plame, Wilson’s wife. Bush said he had no information that Cheney had disclosed Plame’s identity or directed anyone else to do so. </p>
<p><a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0703nj1.htm">http://news.nationaljournal.co&#8230;..703nj1.htm</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Wow, this is a smoking gun! I don’t believe that I read this before you posted it here. Given what we now know about the scope of the disinformation and lying by this criminal administration to garner support for invading Iraq, Bush must have specifically ordered Cheney to undertake a campaign to discredit Joe Wilson because he knew Wilson was telling the truth.</p>
<p>I have assumed that Bush was behind the effort to discredit Wilson because it’s the kind of mean-spirited and unnecessary thing that he would do and I’ve never believed that anyone in his administration would have done it on their own.</p>
<p>The plot thickens, don’t it?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>VP Notes after Libby Meeting: “…sacrifice the guy [this President] asked to stick his neck in the meat grinder …,” :) :)</p>
<p><a href="http://wid.ap.org/documents/libbytrial/jan30/GX53201.PDF">http://wid.ap.org/documents/li&#8230;..X53201.PDF</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adie</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/30/libby-live-judy-three/#comment-483941</link>
		<dc:creator>Adie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 03:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/30/libby-live-judy-three/#comment-483941</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-483896&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Pachacutec @&lt;br /&gt;
                256              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-483227&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;neil @&lt;br /&gt;
                28              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Pach, Can you comment on the psychodrama?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Later.  It was quite the drama though.  I think I developed a psychological Judy profile, though.  At least a good working hypothesis.  Brought me right back to my clinical diagnostic days.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;oh.goody!  Hope there are sufficient maps to same, ’cause I’m ‘multi-tasking’ with “real life” around here &amp; I’m countin’ on ya Pach, if only for background understanding of these …. [words cannot suffice]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks ALL!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-483896"><em>Pachacutec @<br />
                256              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-483227"><em>neil @<br />
                28              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><b><br />
Pach, Can you comment on the psychodrama?</b></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Later.  It was quite the drama though.  I think I developed a psychological Judy profile, though.  At least a good working hypothesis.  Brought me right back to my clinical diagnostic days.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>oh.goody!  Hope there are sufficient maps to same, ’cause I’m ‘multi-tasking’ with “real life” around here &amp; I’m countin’ on ya Pach, if only for background understanding of these …. [words cannot suffice]</p>
<p>Thanks ALL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cinnamonape</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/30/libby-live-judy-three/#comment-483929</link>
		<dc:creator>cinnamonape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 02:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/30/libby-live-judy-three/#comment-483929</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-483518&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Sebastian Dangerfield @&lt;br /&gt;
                231              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-483441&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Nancy Drew @ 212 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-483373&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;watertiger @ 159 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;How could anyone sleep with anyone named “Scooter”?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whenever I hear “Scooter,” I just keep seeing a dog dragging its butt across the lawn after it has  . . .er . . .relieved itself.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Don’t dogs do that when they have worms?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Actually, since you asked, it’s when they have inflamed or abcessed anal sacs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Horrific Image of a young Rush Limbaugh demonstrating his medical impairment to his Draft Board!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-483518"><em>Sebastian Dangerfield @<br />
                231              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-483441"><em>Nancy Drew @ 212 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-483373"><em>watertiger @ 159 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><i>How could anyone sleep with anyone named “Scooter”?</i></p>
<p>Whenever I hear “Scooter,” I just keep seeing a dog dragging its butt across the lawn after it has  . . .er . . .relieved itself.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Don’t dogs do that when they have worms?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Actually, since you asked, it’s when they have inflamed or abcessed anal sacs.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Horrific Image of a young Rush Limbaugh demonstrating his medical impairment to his Draft Board!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cinnamonape</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/30/libby-live-judy-three/#comment-483925</link>
		<dc:creator>cinnamonape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 02:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/30/libby-live-judy-three/#comment-483925</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-483444&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Sparkles the Iguana @&lt;br /&gt;
                215              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-483288&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Tithonia @ 82 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;What is up with the sexual innuendo wrt Judy/Libby and Judy/Chalabi? Is there any basis for it or is it just joking insults?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maureen Dowd famously said that Judy had a “tropism” toward powerful men….I think I’m getting that mostly accurate.  Presumably Mo would know, at least to some degree, having worked at the NYT with Judy.  To what degree “tropism” implies sexual contact, who knows except the parties involved.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe she was implying “trollopism”!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-483444"><em>Sparkles the Iguana @<br />
                215              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-483288"><em>Tithonia @ 82 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>What is up with the sexual innuendo wrt Judy/Libby and Judy/Chalabi? Is there any basis for it or is it just joking insults?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Maureen Dowd famously said that Judy had a “tropism” toward powerful men….I think I’m getting that mostly accurate.  Presumably Mo would know, at least to some degree, having worked at the NYT with Judy.  To what degree “tropism” implies sexual contact, who knows except the parties involved.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Maybe she was implying “trollopism”!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
