
Ground rules: not a court reporter. Limit refreshes, but not refreshments. Shameless commerce: buy this.
Fitz in his seersucker-esque taking a drink of water, looking through his notes.
Here she comes. White shirt, big lapels. No glasses. Checks her counsel, puts glasses on (they're on a fancy string around her neck), is nodding. She doesn't seem like she's breathing.
Jury coming in.
Fitz up.
She sits down, then stands up to take the oath.
Fitz, please state name, and spell last name.
M Judith Miller Freelance journalist.
F when did you first begin to work for NYT.
M 1977. SEC reporter, financial affairs, state department, Cairo bureau chief, Paris correspondant, dpty bureau chief, deputy media editor. special correspondant to gulf war. Then "freeranging investigative reporter."
F how did you first come to know Libby
M Coauthoring book on bioweapons. 2001
F Coauthors
M William Broad, Steven Engelburg.
F How did your work on the book Germs come to bring you in contact with Libby.
M Engelburg said Libby was helpful.
F When met Libby
M I believe I called him and asked to see him.
F Approximate time frame
M Between 9/11 and beginning of Iraq war.
F Evventually meet
M In OEOB, said he had liked our book germs, had not received inscribed copy that others who had contributed had recieved,
F Did you send one
M He said that he had liked my reporting on WMD and terrorism to the US and I expressed a desire to interview him and talk to him on regular basis. When I was working on something on which he might be helpful. He said that would be fine, but would prefer not to see his name in print, we could continue to meet so long as I referred to him as AO or SAO.
F On the record, off the record, deep background.
M On the record, one could use material and could attribute to indiv. Background could use it, but could not name indiv, could name agency. Deep background, could use info but not identify agency or part of govt where indiv worked. Off the record, only if I confirmed it elsewhere.
2:20
M continued to talk to Libby, through Libby's assistant, never email.
M Take notes on steno notebook, try to write down what she or he says, then go back and underline or add things, sometimes I do that contemporaneouslyy. Then when notebook is full, I do an index on the front page, timing, and subject matter.
F How much of the writing in your notes when you were interviewing.
M Almost all is done contemporaneously.
F If you go back, when do you go back.
M depends on deadline.
F conventions when you make highlights or changes.
M Tend to use a different pen or pencil so I know which are contemporaneous and which after the fact.
F conventions of highlighting
M Underline important things Asterix, a box around important subject or topic, when I think theres something I know or need to ask, on back of preceeding page or in brackets.
F If they change topics.
M I draw a line
F If they change ground rules
M I note that in margin
F Early part of 2003. Overseas?
M WMD hunters, went in February, joined unit in March,
M Came back in June permanently, June 8
F easy access to newspapers from America
M No access
F Assignment following Iraq, either by your self or a team,
M A team or reporters looking into whether or not WMD had been flawed or distorted. Why they weren't being found.
F Who else
M Several reporters, I was supposed to write about actual hunt for WMD on ground in iraq and how and why flawed, and provide info for the other part of the project.
F You were going to focus on WMD but any info you'd get you'd provide to fellow reporters.
M State
M I was surprised to see a great debate, a very angry one on whether or not WMD had been distorted or WH had lied.
F where was the anger directed
M At Admin, at media in particular, and me. [you think?!?!?!]
F Did there come a time when you met with Libby
M In OEOB, June 23. (Voice waivers)
M Mr. Libby appeared agitated and frustrated and angry
F HOw could you tell
M He's a lowkey and controlled guy, what he said made me think I was correct. He was concerned that CIA was beginning to backpdal to distance self from unequivocal estimates it provided before the war through a "perverted war of leaks."
F Did the topic of Joseph Wilson come up
F What do you recall was said
M His office had learned that he had been sent overseas, initially referred to as clandestine guy. VP had asked about a report in Winter 2002, in Africa, CIA hd sent Mr Wilson out to investigate claim.
F Was Libby saying VP sent WIlson
M the contrary. He said that VP did not know that Mr Wilson had been sent.
2:29
F What he said about Winter 2002 and how it related to trip.
M There had been reports, a report had gone up to the Hill indicating that Iraq hunting for uranium in Niger. VP had asked about those reporters, agency had taken upon itself to find out more. In the beginning he referred to Wilson as clandestine guy.
F Mr. Wilson's wife (voice not in gerat shape)
M Yes, when he was discussing intell reporting, he said his wife (referring to Wilson) worked in the bureau
F What did you understand bureau to mean
M I was a little unsure, My understanding was FBI, but the context it was clear he was referring to CIA
F Any particular bureau?
M I thought he was using bureau to refer to Nonproliferation burea, but I wasn't sure.
F How did you write it in notes
M In parentheses. He had mentioned it as an aside or because I was puzzled by it. I put a question mark about it.
F Why
M I can't be sure.
F any other discussion.
Sidebar.
Judy slouches, looks at lawyers.
2:32
Big eyes, looking forward.
F Any other conversation about pres and WH and CIA?
M Yes, Mr Libby seemed really unhappy and irritated abotu the fact that he accused CIA of leaking info that would distance agency from earlier estimates. He said that nobody had ever come to WH from CIA and said Mr. Pres, this is not correct, this is not right. He thought if CIA had such doubts they should have shared them
F relevance to Wilson
M People were beginning to focus on Wilson, but Wilson was a ruse, an irrelevance
F Did you cover the area you were assigned to.
Walton Was he using Wilson's name
M First as a clandestine guy, then began talking about Joe Wilson by name
F Returning to conversation about the wife working in bureau, did he indicate whether he had heard it from reporters
M NO
F Op-ed?
M Yes. I was surprised by it. Because it was first time that someone who had purported to be part of collection mechanism, first time someone was publicly alleging that admin had lied or distorted info about WMD. It was a serious charge. Second thing that surprised me, I wondered how the CIA would have permitted him to write such an article attacking the president.
Now speaking with her hands.
M Or excuse me sir--or whether it had approved it.
F You met with Libby again
M July 8 at St Regis, in dining room. Mr Libby's choice. About 2 hours.
F Did Libby have papers
M piece of paper in pocket
F Single or more than one
M DOn't remember. Libby was frustrated, quietly agitated. more wideranging discussion about intell that admin had collected and Powell presentation.
F June 23 ground rules:
M Off the record
F At beginning of July 8
M No discussion at beginning of specific attributions
F Mr Wilson was discussed, did ground rules remain same
M Ground rules changed. Libby said, when we shifted into alleged efforts to acquire uranium, he wanted to be identified on deeper background and I think he said something like Former Hill staffer
F had you ever been asked by him before to treat him as Former Hill staffer
M No
F demeanor?
M Equally frustrated and unhappy
F what discussed. [Judy uncomfortable]
M SAid plenty of info before Powell presentation was given, supporting Iraq hunting uranium, it had been shown that IRaq HAD acquired uranium in Africa, prior to 1st gulf war, in 80s IAEA stated taht Iraq had acquired, after that several different reports that Iraq in market again for uranium. 2 reports, for a long-term arrangement for large quantities, and then a shorter term amount, then referred to anohter report, a third report, the arrival of a delegation in 1999 this delegation was seeking a broader trade relationship, since Niger only had one export, officials had concluded that Iraq was interested in uranium, Author of this report was Joe Wilson. The report had gone up to the Hill. Talking about info provided to Hill, which had prompted VP questions.
F Did he indicate who provided this report
M CIA
F Discussion about Mr. Wilson's wife on this occasion.
M Two streams of reporting on uranium and efforst by Iraq to aquire uranium, first stream reports like Wilson, --then made an aside, Wilson's wife works at WINPAC Weapons Intelligence Nonproliferation and Arms Control, specifically focused on WMD.
F Before June 23, had you ever heard that Wilson's wife worked at CIA/
M Not before that meeting
F On July 8, any new info
M WINPAC was new
F Any discussion of covert or non-covert?
M Not that I remember no, No discussion whether she was classified or non-classified.
F Any discussion of learnign this from other newspaper reporters.
F discussion about NIE
M Defended NIE, based on reporting from many different sources He said classified version even stronger, it was not at all equivocal. Said if anything classified was stronger
F Any qualificatoin, any place where a doubt would be expressed
M Yes, didn't know classified or unclassified, said INR had expressed doubts about uranium hunting, alleged uranium hunting activities, had been included in appendix. What he was saying was that these doubts not prominently featured. He said policy makers had not seen them
F Did you take notes, anything particular about process
Obejction sustained
F Pen or pencil
M Used pen. The pen didn't work
2:46
F Did you talk to other people
M I think I did, as soon as I remember learning about Wilson's wife
M I don't remember who, I consulted my notes, references by initials and names, not tied to any interview in any notebook, can't remember whether it was before or after info became public.
F Did you speak to him again
M Wanted follow-up. We agreed to speak on phone, I recall less about that meeting. The first time Libby called me I was getting into a taxi, I couldn't take notes, Didn't want to talk in a taxi, spoke from home in Sag Harbor
F Did you take notes, have you reviewed those notes, clear memory of conversation
M Not very clearly--
F what do you remember
M I remember telling him that I didn't think I was going to write a story about it, the NYT wasn't interested in pursuing Plame story. We talked about retraction of 16 words. It was more following up on other two conversations. Don't have specific memory of other things
F saw Libby in person
M In Jackson Hole WY, at a rodeo, I went with my husband. This figure approached me, began talking to me, it became time to introduce husband, it became clearer I didn't know who it was. Judy, you don't know who this is, sunglasses, black t-shirt, cowboy boots. I had never seen him in any thing but a suit. Just some banter about meeting in Aspen. Meeting of Aspen startegy group. Topic had been lack of WMD in Iraq.
F A subpoena, what did you do in response
M I decided to fight the subpoena
F Where, who
M Judge Hogan, we lost effort to quash subpoena, we appealed, Federal Appellate court, our appeal was rejected, appealed to SCOTUS, SCOTUS declined to hear case. I returned to Hogan's chambers, he ordered me to comply, I told him I did not have a waiver from my source that I believed was person. I was held in contempt.
F You violated order of court
M I did not testify. I was sent to jail at Alexandria detention center, for 85 days. Shortly before I was released received waiver from Libby and oppty to question him on phone and you agreed to narrow focus of questioning to mr. Libby and to the subject matter of Plame Wilson leak.
F After released, what did you do
M Testfied before GJ, I testified the next day,
F Did you tell them about July 8 meeting, and phone conversations later that week, did you described June 23 meeting
M I did not, I didn't remember it.
F Were you asked to do anything
M You asked me, I couldn't pinpoint time of second meeting in Sag Harbor if I would check notebooks, to better place time.
F Did you do that
M I found, when I returned to my office, I looked under my desk there was a shopping bag full of my notebooks. Looked through July, picked up June, and discovered entire conversation in June, that I had forgotten about. I happened to be on phone with Bennett, urged him to call you and tell you there was more info
F Did you return to GJ and describe that conversation?
2:55
F Your pen wasn't working, did you take notes?
M I did
Jeffress up
J this conversation that you described in such detail--when you first appeared, did you remember that at all, didn't remember a thing about it, Today you've described in great detail
M No, the highlights of it
J Something that refers to one entry about wife works in bureau
M Most of that meeting had to do wtih Mr Wilson and Niger (Drinks water)
J Do you recall that investigation began Late 2003
J Remember when Novak named Ms. Plame? Didn't you read articles and watch television reports?
M I remember that an investigation was opened.
J Did you tell Taubman at NYT that you had not been recipient of any calculated leak
M Later on, I told him that I had discussed Ms. Wilson, Ms. Plame, with people, but that I didn't think I was the target of concerted leak campaign, because I didn't know if there was one. (drinks more water, looks at lawyers, not breathing again)
J Do you recall writing a letter to MoDo? Do you recall writing that Taubman
M THen bureau chief, NYT bureau chief
J Do you recall him asking a group of reporters a question, do you recall him asking that question
J You were unaware that such a campaign existed?
J You never wrote anything about Wilson's wife. Did you recommend doing so
M To Washington Bureau Chief, Jill Abramson
J What is your recollection of your conversatoin
M Very short time after second meeting with Libby, closed the door, outlined some of the highlights, told her there was something I thought we ought to follow up on, you ought to have someone pursue this whether Joe Wilson's wife worked at agency. She was distracted. It was tumultuous period, Exec Ed had been fired, She just said mmhmmm.
M She's the managing editor in NY.
Walton Approach the bench please
3:03
Short recess
I'll start the next thread.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
fdl
2×2day (tee hee!). Now for a life, and to read the post!!
When were Libby and Miller spied in Wyoming together?
Answering my own question via one of Georgia10’s diaries… it was supposedly some time in 2003.
Oh, this is gonna be good.
*gets popcorn*
Looks like I won’t be getting any work done this afternoon.
M A R C Y!
yippee
TRex @ 4
I have a bit of a cold and took the day off! I probably could have dragged myself in, but I had a light day and figured “What the heck, I’d rather follow the trial today at home than try to look busy at work when I’m not.”
Why was Libby so interested in germ weapons? What is his background? Why was Miller so interested in WMDS? What didn’t they like about Plame? Only asking…..
… finally, the stuffing in the twinkie!
EW: It’s obviously working. So please keep doing it. At amazon, it’s now considerably up from this morning:
Shit! I’m actually having to go to work today.
No one understands my obsession!
TRex @
4
AAAAAUGH!
I have engine parts scattered all over, I HAVE to work today.
(snivel)
Will do my best to pop in occasionally.
C’mon lunchtime!
TRex @ 4
The Super-Duper size with Extra Butter?
The many faces (pictures) of Judy Miller - Femme Fatale or Stalked by Scooter?
Judy judy judy, you’re just misunderstood. We know, and want to understand you. Help us understand, Judy. Help America understand. :)
AZ Matt @ 13
And a giant box of Milk Duds.
Here she comes. White shirt, big lapels. No glasses. Checks her counsel, puts glasses on (they’re on a fancy string around her neck), is nodding. She doesn’t seem like she’s breathing.
She’s breathless… Ahhhhh or is she the liViNg DeAd
Wordsmith @ 11
lol! My husband thinks I’m nuts.
neil @ 17
Undead, undead, undead, undead…
(Bauhaus)
Libby was interested in germ weapons, because as a Neo-Con he was into hyping an invasion of Iraq. Miller was interested in WMD because, alas, she was in cohoots with the neo-con bunch. What did they dislike about Plame: One she was too pretty for Judy Judy (Meow) and two - as someone involved in stopping nuclear proliferation she knew the truth about WMD in Iraq (none), and two she was working to stop their proliferation which the neo-cons (with armaments companies) wanted to sell to other countries. Note that it was a US company which sold the nuke info to China; basically they want to get everyone nuked up to make a buck. Anyway, that is my take on it.
My GF broke up with me over this case!
Tithonia @ 18
i don’t know if anybody’s brought this up yet:
what must judy miller be feeling right now, under oath, having to answer questions posed by the guy who got her sent to jail, with her answers being heard by another guy who let her sit there all those months….?
Why would Libby be an expert source on the subject of bioweapons? None of his training is even remotely in the field. He’d been out of government for almost a decade.
But, he was probably comfy with the political views of Laurie Mylroie, Miller’s BFF….
TRex @
4
Sadly, I think we may miss the best part — the questions jurors submit to Judge Walton once they get an introduction to how this famous journalist (who will probably show no more comprehension or insight into her own notes than an archaeologist from another planet would) operates.
I doubt the most amusing questions will get asked in court.
Ever read this?
http://www.cjr.org/issues/2005/6/judycode.asp
Judy recalls her meeting with Libby, “He was concerned that CIA was beginning to backpdal to distance self from unequivocal estimates it provided before the war through a ‘perverted war of leaks.’”
Continued smokescreen to fog the role of Pentagon’s Office of Special Plans which was stovepiping intel direct to Cheney…
Swopa @ 24
Oh, that is hilarious!
How could Miller be surprised at the anger and debate over whether the WH lied about WMD and us into war?
What did Libby mean by ‘the aspens are turning’ or something like that - was that something about WMDS?
Richmond @ 20
help!
what does OEOB mean?
Arches back and hisses, then growls low in her throat, tail switching to and fro like an angry cobra.
Caramel Corn here….
AZ Matt @
13
Butter-flavored topping. Liquid lard.
*burp*
What a great amount of energy spent building and chasing bullshit.
moi @ 30
Old Executive Office Building, adjacent to the White House…
OEOB Old Executive Office Building?
Old Executive Office Building (also called the Eisenhower or Wedding Cake Building — French Baroque monstrosity directly west of the White House)
TRex @ 31
All right, that’s it. No more drinking while reading firedoglake!
Hmm, a flat statement — didn’t Judy’s description of her grand jury testimony say Libby wasn’t sure if Wilson’s wife worked there?
TRex @ 31
Bad!!!! “g”
‘k, thanks dqueue.
BTW, Judy’s voice usually quivers when she talks. I suspect it’ll be extra-quivering this afternoon. She’s widely despised by several journalists, and she still doesn’t understand why.
Peterr @ 8
A few reminders to the regulars and words of welcome to newcomers. . .
FDL’s comments are moderated, mostly to eliminate the mass spam that flies around the Internet. All comments run first through an automated spam filter, and if caught, are then checked by human moderators, because in addition to spam, the filters also catch regular comments from time to time.
Here’s some info that will keep your comments from landing in moderation or otherwise clog things up and make life difficult for the mods:
1. Size matters. Long posts get automatically put in moderation and require the mods to set them free. If you want to use a post from elsewhere, don’t cut and paste the whole thing; just give us a link and post a snippet. It saves space here, and gives the original author the traffic they deserve on their site.
2. Words matter. Especially those words that appear in email spam. Creative use of asterisks in words like “ins*rance” or “vi*gra” will keep things from getting caught in the filters.
3. Links matter. If you put a comment in with more than two or three links, it will end up in moderation. If you absolutely, positively have to have multiple links, you probably want to split it into multiple comments.
4. Attribution matters. If you are posting a news item, give us a link so we know where it came from, how timely it is, and how credible it is.
5. Preview is your friend. Before you send that post, especially if you’ve used bold, italics, or inserted a link, check it out by clicking the preview button before you submit it. It saves on the cleaning bills.
6. Beware the ziggurat! That is, when you quote a comment that quotes a comment that quotes a comment, etc. the resulting nest can “bust the margins” of the webpage. To correct this, the mods have to go in and mess with the coding . . . it’s no fun, and can easily be avoided if you snip out some of the innermost comments of the nest or simply start a new comment and point back to the original with “Jane @ 25″ or some other referent.
Finally, and most importantly: Do not feed the trolls. It just encourages them, and makes life difficult for the mods.
If your comments do end up in moderation, don’t panic. The mods will see them, and free them up in short order. Comments that get held up in moderation, however, do NOT appear if you simply hit “Refresh Comments.” They come up when the entire page is reloaded using F5 or your browser’s “reload” function. Every so often, it’s worth reloading the page to see what might have been missed.
That’s also how Marcy makes her updates on the action in the courthouse. It keeps all the courtroom action in one place. (If she did it in the comments, her jewels would be scattered among our great questions and snark.) But have mercy on the servers, and don’t keep pounding away at them by reloading the page every 30 seconds to find The Latest New Thing. If she can wait 15 minutes to update, you can wait 15 minutes to reload.
And if you’re able, toss a few $$, euros, sheckles, or other fun currencies into the FDL donation basket up there on the right side of the page. That’s what makes this all possible.
Welcome to the ‘Lake! The water’s warm, so jump right in.
************************
also…. please help defray costs for this liveblogging effort by donating (buttons at top right of page). While FDL people are doing this work gratis, FDL had to rent an apartment for them to stay at, plus there are meals, travel, and other expenses to be covered.
Donations with 7 cents added (i.e. $50.07) are used specifically to support this live blog effort. Other donations will be used to support the site in general (like paying for bandwidth, etc….)
Thanx
If Cheney gets to testify, I’m taking time off & stocking up on EVERYTHING….firewood, beer, salted peanuts, hot tamales (candy) - what else? Milk?
F where was the anger directed
M At Admin, at media in particular, and me. [you think?!?!?!]
EW - you’re killing me!
Fitzmas @ 21
i am nuts, pass the popcorn
F What do you recall was said
M His office had learned that he had been sent overseas, initially referred to as clandestine guy. VP had asked about a report in Winter 2002, in Africa, CIA hd sent Mr Wilson out to investigate claim.
[..]
F What he said about Winter 2002 and how it related to trip.
M There had been reports, a report had gone up to the Hill indicating that Iraq hunting for uranium in Niger. VP had asked about those reporters, agency had taken upon itself to find out more. In the beginning he referred to Wilson as clandestine guy.
======
Got it Judy, you said it twice, the clandestine guy.
Did she just testify Scooter told her about Wilson on June 23, 2003? That Scooter knew about Plame on June 23?
PLEASE CLARIFY, ’cause this is Really Good.
Keep reposting that….and often. I’ll put money in every day. I can make coffee at home for a bit.
Richmond@20
“Libby was interested in germ weapons, because as a Neo-Con he was into hyping an invasion of Iraq. Miller was interested in WMD because, alas, she was in cohoots with the neo-con bunch. What did they dislike about Plame: One she was too pretty for Judy Judy (Meow) and two - as someone involved in stopping nuclear proliferation she knew the truth about WMD in Iraq (none), and two she was working to stop their proliferation which the neo-cons (with armaments companies) wanted to sell to other countries. Note that it was a US company which sold the nuke info to China; basically they want to get everyone nuked up to make a buck. Anyway, that is my take on it.”
Yeah, baby! Now we’re on to it! The whole shebang is a farce to make $$$$$! Americans die, who cares, we’re gonna get rich(er)! Iraqis die, who cares, we’re gonna get rich(er)!
Sickos.
It appears that Walton did some research during one of the breaks..came back and said that any leak after July 8 was not a leak because it had been declassified…am I right here?..can the president declassify info to cover their butts or is this just a coincidence?..this seems pretty important to me or am I way off base?…could someone who understand this please respond
“I was surprised that there was a debate about the fact that the major justification for the war had turned out not to exist. I was shocked to discover that some people thought the administration had lied. And I was especially shocked to discover that some people were made at ME!!! A prize-winning journalist!!! So I went back to my sources to see if I could get another rationale that would justify my prior reporting.”
Damnit. I have to go to work now too. I’ll be up late tonight catching up on this amazing stuff. Thanks, FDL!!!
scribe @ 48
That’s how I read it.
scribe @ 48
that IS what she said your not dreaming
Scribe@48
I think that’s what she said. Assuming EW got it right…
Did she just out Wilson as “clandestine”?
Biodun @ 10
Marcy,
I was in Seattle this weekend thinking to pick up a copy of your book to read on the plane coming home. Neither Elliot Bay Bookstore nor Left Bank Books (both down on First Avenue) had it, nor knew of it, and they are the most likely outlets outside stores in the University District. Left a strong recommend with Elliot Bay to get it ASAP, but when you have time, you might push your publisher to move product. As it is, I will now order from Amazon.
Wordsmith @ 44
Garlic.
fahrender @ 22
I’m sure she would like to stab everybody in the room. I would (like to), if I were her.
Remember tho, this isn’t a transcript.
Wordsmith (44) — already laid in a supply of powdered and canned milk. Frozen egg substitute in freezer.
Bring it on. ;-)
xiamiam @ 51
Leak? Does this mean that the President has the legal authority to “out” a CIA agent on a whim, or to cover the *sses of his subordinates…
I understand he has the legal right to declassify info, but how can this ruling be extended to a CIA agent, or for that matter an FBI agent who is undercover for some reason?
If I were a dem in congress, I would jump all over this…because if this is the letter of the law, then it stinks.
litigatormom @ 52
“I was surprised that there was a debate about the fact that the major justification for the war had turned out not to exist. I was shocked to discover that some people thought the administration had lied. And I was especially shocked to discover that some people were made at ME!!! A prize-winning journalist!!! So I went back to my sources to see if I could get another rationale that would justify my prior reporting.”
Stop! You’re killing me! I can just imagine her saying exactly this over a bottle or three of merlot.
O boy.
I didn’t know blink about Judy b4 I came here. I I just knew that America had swallowed the WMD propaganda.
The anger and smarts of you all at FDL helped me deal with my frustation about the gullible public and press.
Hopefully Judy will be exposed as the shill she is.
OK I feel better now.
Is there a sidebar, or is Judy just slumping in her chair in a paroxysm of self-pity?
Wordsmith @ 44
Mmmmm…hot tamales, the perfect candy for the keyboard!
woo hoo. June 23rd! A day that will live in infamy for Judy and Scooty. And my birthday. Thanks for the present, Fitz!
Woodhall Hollow @ 63
I think Walton is referring to declassification of the NIE.
I doubt the most amusing questions will get asked in court.
“Judge Walton: What does the ‘F’ in ‘Judith F. Miller’ stand for?”
IIRC Scooter knew about Plame in late May. Can anyone back that up? I think I read that at the next hurrah.
dqueue @ 26
And yet she actually mentioned it, somewhat obliquely:
Note that it’s not a CIA report, it’s just something that magically showed up, and yet (according to her testimony) Libby was already engaged in the plan to pretend that the “unequivocal estimates” had come from the CIA.
This is fascinating! I just happened upon this site while surfing for information on the Libby trial. Enjoying the reporting nearly as much as the comments!
litigatormom @ 66
That’s what I was wondering.
Nope…..”Big eyes, looking forward.” We’re back.
Apologies. Can’t help but chuckle every time Marcy reminds us Fitz is wearing seersucker-esque duds.
NO one else remembering the prez picking on poor hapless reporter for wearing seersucker to a presser, instead of just answering the poor guy’s question?
Well, SEERSUCKER IS BACK, BABY! *g*
Duct tape, plastic sheeting and a gas mask.
beth meacham @
59
I think Walton is referring to declassification of the NIE.
ok..but how exactly or does it? relate to Plames’ covert status?
why did he say that?
I’m just a regular person trying to understand this…appreciate
A “Perverted war of leaks?” I’d say! And it was the OVP and White House that was leading this war…
From Linda’s link @ 25 above:
Oh, thanks, Judy.
I don’t know about anyone else here, but I am DYING to know what is going on at the defense table right now.
In the meantime — poooor Judy, facing a man she can’t control with her sexuality. Somehow, I just don’t think she’s PJF’s type…
-S
“M July 8 at St Regis, in dining room. Mr Libby’s choice. About 2 hours.” Your place or mine? His choice. Does she mention that it was for breakfast?
Woodhall Hollow @ 63
I have never heard anyone claim that Bush declassified Plame’s status as a NOC. The issue, as I understood it, was that Libby didn’t “leak” anything in the NIE because Bush had declassified the parts that he told reporters about.
I don’t know if — even assuming that Bush does have “inherent” authority to declassify material — Bush can “out” a NOC status. I think the IIPA would apply to him too, no? I mean, when you out a NOC, you’re putting someone’s very life at risk, and although Bush is certainly a devotee of executions, I can’t imagine that a president can unilaterally do that.
But so much has happened in the last 6 years that I never imagined….
Aspens!
Richmond @
20
Absolutely, Richmond. The opportunity to “get a twofer” by outing Valerie Plame proved too juicy for Cheney (or was it W?) to resist. Poof(1), Wilson “discredited” by suspicion of nepotism; plus Poof(2), outing Plame blows her and her Brass Plate front organization, Brewster Jennings, thus chopping the brains and eyes out of the CPD, permitting the war to proceed profitably, plus lots more proliferation elsewhere. How many Brewster Jennings people and foreign contacts were lost because of this TREASON?
Again, I don’t think Judy presented this as a flat statement by Libby when she wrote up her grand jury testimony for the NYT.
She was covering for him, apparently. (Or at least not wanting it known publicly that she’d given him the knife.)
fahrender @ 22 asks what must judy miller be feeling right now, under oath, having to answer questions posed by the guy who got her sent to jail, with her answers being heard by another guy who let her sit there all those months….?
Maybe she feels like a fresh young princess?
Adie @ 75
Off-topic, in the movie Sophie’s Choice, Meryl Streep as Sophie, in a convincing Slavic accent, greets one of the characters who is wearing seersucker this way: “Oh, Stingo, you are dressed up in your cocksucker suit!”
litigatormom @
52
Nicely paraphrased.
It is with much wailing and gnashing of teeth that I must take my leave of this convivial gathering of friends. Something about having to go to work or something. It’s connected to those paycheck things that come at the end of the month.
SOS - Yes TREASON! - and worse, remember the 3,000 war dead, 50,000 injured, 200,000 Iraqis, and trillions in lost income for our our children. And it continues!
xiamiam @ 51
I can’t imagine that would be the case. As far as I know, the only argument has been that the NIE was declassified, which (while I think it’s debatable) may not have been contested by Fitz in this case. To my knowledge, no one has claimed that the prez or VP declassified Valerie Plame’s identity.
I think the date may relate more to the fact that Libby claims to have been told about Plame by Russert on July 10, so any leak after that isn’t material to the case.
Might as well make my break now whilst there’s no new ‘transcription’ from the trial.
Thanks for the hilarity and insights, yu’ll.
politicalpolyanna @ 73
Welcome! I’m sure you’ll be addicted, just like the rest of us, very soon.
FYI to the FDL crew - I made a donation about a week ago, but I’d forgotten about the .07 to add on. I’m sure you’ll use the money for whatever you need it for.
Did she really say, about Joe Wilson’s op-ed in the New York Times, “I wondered how the CIA would have permitted him to write such an article attacking the president?“
Does the fact that Joe Wilson was exposing the truth matter to her? Is protecting the president the duty of a free press?
politicalpolyanna @ 73
Welcome to the Lake! Can I fix you a drink?
No, no! Must…go…to…work…