
Standard housekeeping warnings. emptywheel? Not a court reporter (in fact, she's the author of Anatomy of Deceit)–consider this a decent paraphrase, but not a transcript. And updates? Please consider the servers before you update every minute.
Quick note from Pach: It's disorienting to see Ari Fleischer answer this many qustions in a row without dodging, weaving, fogging or lying. Bizarre indeed!
Pach is off to the Court Room. He said the juror who is gone is the white 30s female who laughs a lot, a travel agent. I'm fairly certain she was one of the jurors, not an alternate. Don't know who was the first alternate, but I think all the alternates were from the last day of voir dire.
Also about Ari, I don't know whether it's the close circuit TV, but back in the day, he had a kind of evil charisma. He doesn't look so good today. But he certainly seems reasonably comfortable on the stand. He's got a striped tie on. Pours water. Sitting there turning in his seat with his mouth set.
When Ari was asked her name apparently he said it was "Plame or Plam-ay." So I think the problem with Ms. Plam-ay is she's French.
Jurors coming in.
You may be seated, good afternoon. Asks about temperature. Ari is laughing about something. Now has his face fixed again.
P resuming.
P just finishing up asking questions about lunch on July 7. Did Libby say anything to you to make you think the info was classified or protected. Later that day, overseas trip.
Fl Overnight flight to Senegal. The President was going on a trip, left out of Edwards aboard AF1.
P Staff
Fl COS, SOS,NSA, Bartlett, and other support people from WH, press aboard AF1.
P scheduled duration?
Fl Left US on July 7, returned on July 12. Involved 5 African nations.
P During the course of the trip, decision made that WH would walk away, no longer stand behind 16 words.
Fl Night of July 7, meetings taking place, whether we would stand by the 16 words, conveyed by Hadley or Michael Anton, one of those two, WH not stand by this any longer, our position was we didn't know if accurate or not, but it didn't rise to the level of SOTU.
P Conveyed to the press? End controversy?
Fl Started the controversy.
P July 11, Dr. Rice, press gaggle on same subject.
Fl On a trip abroad, I'd ask NSA to go to the back of the plane to address press. Dr. Rice came to the back. That was contentious, Press asking how could this happen? You're the WH, mistakes like this shouldn't happen. Dr. Rice said something that had not been previously said, Had DCI wanted those words to come out, it would have come out. Now WH seems to be blaming CIA for words not getting taken out.
P Are you able to monitor press coverage.
Fl Yes, I get transcripts, news shows.
P Coverage about Africa, what it had hoped for?
Fl Whole trip mired in controversy.
1:39
P Did you hear someone on AF1 make another reference to Wilson's wife.
Fl Staff cabin, Dan Bartlett, Comm Dir, reading a different document. He said, "I can't believe he or they are saying that the VP sent Amb Wilson to Niger, his wife sent him, she works at CIA. He said this in front of me.
P Would you characterize this as a conversation?
Fl Dan was venting. That became the second reference I learned, I overheard. I don't recall who was there.
P What was your reaction?
Fl I heard all this before. Never seemed very newsie. The one thing it backed up my statement, VP didn't send Ambassador, he was sent by his wife. I had one more nugget to back up that statement.
P Were you in Uganda. Can you tell us if you had an occasion to talk to reporters by the side of the road.
Fl President walking toward second event. Meeting with young children who were going to sing songs. A group of reporters on the side of the road. I recall I said to these reporters, If you want to know who sent Amb Wilson to Niger, it was his wife, she works there. Tamara Lippert Newsweek, David Gregory and John Dickerson, Time Magazine.
P was this a formal interview?
Fl One of the many conversations I had with the press, the event was not one I had to be there. You sidle up to reporters and chat what was on their mind. Maybe this will address some of these issues about how people got sent. This backs up WH statement.
P What part of it backs up WH account?
Fl Allegation WH twisted intelligence. Amb Wilson wrote that a report had been filed. He said Cheney had played a role must be known by VP. I had been told by two WH officials, which I seemed like I should send on. VP wasn't involved in it. That's why I made a judgment to say that to the press.
P Did you statement get much of a reaction?
Fl Press's reaction was so what. Didnt' take out notebook, Didn't ask any follow-up calls.
P Metaphorically speaking?
Fl Like a lot of things i said to the press it had no impact.
P Did you have a reaction to their lack of reaction?
Fl I try to think of things through the eyes of reporters. I don't think reporters are going to be particularly interested. There wasn't much news there. No one really cares who sent him.
P Did you have any hestitation about sharing this?
Fl I never would have thought this was classified. never in my wildest dreams believed this involved, as I've read since, this involved a covert officer.
Sidebar
1:48
Btw, Dickerson is upstairs in the court room, everyone wants to know why this is different than what he reported.
Now Ari has a kind of pouty face on.
Walton, In reference to the Witness' testimony about what he read in the newspaper. That testimony is only relevant as it relates to his state of mind was. It has no relevance to this case. I don't know based on what has been presented to me, what her status was. It's totally irrelevant to this case.
P Your last day at the WH was when
Fl July 14, 2003
Fl The next I started my own business
P Late September, two and a half months later. Did you learn information that caused you concern.
Fl I saw article in NYT that CIA asked DOJ into investigation of identity of covert CIA agent. Went online at WaPo, read very big story about CIA asking for criminal investigation. I read that article.
P Was the person identified?
Fl As I recall it was Amb Joseph Wilson's wife. I was absolutely horrified. I thought I may have played a role in outing, oh my god did I play a role in outing a CIA officer, even though I had no idea that she was classifed or covert,
P What did you do?
Fl I contacted counsel.
P is that how you subsequently obtained immunity
Fl Yes
P Prior to obtaining immunity did you answer questions.
Fl No, bc I thought I might somehow be in trouble,
P Once you obtained immunity, did you answer all the questions put to you.
Walton reminds that this article only relates to Ari.
Cross-Exam.
1:55
Jeffress up.
J You spent two and a half years answering questions twice a day. In formal and informal settings.
J You represnted President of US. Some questions were hostile.
J How many times did you meet with the prosecutors.
Fl (something like 8 times)
J How many times have you met with any representative for the defense. You refused?
Fl I declined to do so.
J You recollect that Libby told you info about Amb Wilson's wife. You saw no reason why you couldn't share that info. You left that evening for Africa, reporters from NBC news,
Fl on AF1 there's always a smaller pool, 6-7 reporters and 6-7 technical people.
J reporters on AF1 and reporters on another plane. Do you recall it was not just an op-ed but also MTP
Fl I only know that looking back. I did not watch MTP that morning.
J have you ever watched that video?
J Don't you recall reading an article by Pincus and Leiby?
Fl What I recall was something in the air that spring, I was very aware of the accusations made, that President Bush should have known.
J I'm focusing on the day before you left for Africa. Part of your duty was to read the press critical of the president. Mentions op-ed and Leiby article.
Fl The appearance on TV I only know looking backward.
Fl only became big once we got to Africa, only after WH said we would no longer stand by 16 words.
J Did you tell reporters anything on that plane, to Africa? Did you tell any reporters the next day? Did you fly from Senegal to SA, did you tell reporters. The next day you spent in SAfrica. Did you tell any reporters in SAfrica. Spent the day in Botswana or flying back to SAfrica, did you give any info to reporters about Wilson's wife
Fl not that day.
J On July 11, while flying from SAfrica to Uganda, you had a conversation
Fl I don't know that I'd call a conversation. He vented out loud. He may have been named counsel at that point, it was comm director as I remember.
Flashes picture of Bartlett on screen.
J Is he still in WH, title?
Fl Counselor to President.
Fl He said it out loud, I don't know that he was talking directly to me, I can't believe he, or that Wilson said VP sent him to Niger, his wife sent him, she works at the CIA. If it was they, I think it'd be a reference to the press.
J Up until that time ,you hadn't said anything about her. But after that you said it to two reporters on the side of the road.
Fl There was one other event that made it relevant.
J But that's true, right, that you told two reporters on the side of the road.
J Goes to Libby conversation. This lunch had been set up once before, set up and postponed. It wasn't set up after Wilson's article. It was set up, he asked you to go to lunch bc he knew you were leaving, you had never had lunch with him. All your meetings on the fringe or outside meetings.
J You had had a press gaggle that morning, you used the talking points from Cathie Martin and OVP.
Fl was provided by VP staff, I don't know whether she gave me the talking points orally but what I said was what they told me to say.
J customary for them to email talking points to you.
Fl I would get info from others at WH. It'd be typical for someone involved in something that could be news to tell me or provide it in writing.
Enters defense exhibit, gaggle transcript.
2:06
J First questions were about Liberia
Fl This was the issue that for the first day of the trip was on the minds of the press, this was the big one at least at that time.
J If you look at page 5 of the gaggle.
Going over the zero nada new comment in the gaggle.
Still going through the stuff he said that came from Cathie Martin's talking points.
J Had you received other information relating to this controversy.
Fl I received other info about why he said what he said, why did Pres say those 16 words. I received other info saying why he might say it.
J When you said that morning that it had been discovered after the SOTU were forgeries
J did you consider that day or any other day that Mr. Wilson's report is why the WH took back the report.
Fl not sure what J is asking.
J Was the report why the WH took back the 16 words.
Fl on that day I wouldn't have known about that.
J In terms about any conversation about Wilson's wife, 15 seconds, 20 seconds?
Fl very plain spoken, matter of fact.
J Mr Libby did not use the word nepotism. You believe Mr. Libby told you the name. When you testified before the GJ you pronounced her name two different names, Plamay and Plame? If you had heard it pronounced one way or another you'd have remembered?
Fl I didn't pay attention to the name.
J The first newspaper story that came out with her name in it was Novak's column. It had had her name as Plame. If you had read that, it would be natural you might mispronounce. Some might pronounce Plamay and some Plame?
Fl and isn't that why you don't know how it's pronounced. What difference did it make to me what her name was?
J It didn't make any difference to you. That's why you say you think, but you can't be sure about that, can you?
Fl with absolute certainty, no.
J to the extent you began to get questions from the press, is it fair to say you didn't think information that his wife worked at the CIA would be a good way for the WH to respond.
Fl it wasn't very relevant, what the Press was looking at, other than that one point, that the CIA said they sent it. When you are the PS, the press challenges everything you say, they want you to back it up. Talks about first blaming 9/11 on AQ. A reporter says "prove it."
J Isn't it true that prior to conversation about Bartlett, you though the press wouldn't find that interesting.
Fl Other than that one nugget.
J Did you testify to GJ, And it struck me that it was not material. The press would not find it interesting one way or another. if his wife sent him. The press was very interested in teh substance of did president Bush knowingly deceive..
Fl Yes, Ive said that earlier today, already. And I think I mentioned the nugget before the GJ.
J Did you have a gaggle.
Fl Dr Rice came to the back. I believe that Dr Rice came to the back of the airplane prior to Bartlett said that.
J Is it fair to say press all over the Wilson story.
Fl The story they were over was how could Pres put this in SOTU, and how could this happen.
J After the gaggle, this is when you were reading a document. What was it.
Fl A CIA summary of his trip.
J Why were you reading it?
Fl Rice was asked if she could declassify this information. Show us the reason why. There was a meeting in senior staff cabin, we were talking about why president said what he said. I wanted to see that doct, bc Rice said this part backs up what president said.
J gives the report. You recognize that as the report.
2:20
Fl I believe that this is the document, with everything blacked out, I can't tell.
J this [cable, interesting word choice] was not written by Wilson, it was written by CIA
J According to this report, former Nigerien PM Mayaki who was FM from 96 to 97, and Niger's PM 97-99, stated he was unaware of contracts being signed. Mayaki did relate that Barka Tafrigi approached him to say he should meet with Iraq delegation. Although meeting took place… [continues reading from report].
J Is it a fact that you said Wilson's report supported claim that Iraq seeking yellowcake in Africa
Fl I remember thinking this supports what Pres said in SOTU.
J You recall Tenet put out a statement,
Fl I know statement came out after I made statement by side of the road.
[Ari fucked up--said the statement came out on the 10th]
J notice in the middle of the third paragraph, statement didn't say the meeting didn't take place
Fl Which was a point I made to the press the following day.
J Going back to the cable, do you recall testifying to GJ that this report referred to Wilson by name, I know I though that this covered Amb Wilson's findings.
GJ testimony up again.
J did you say it referred to Wilson by name
Fl, yes
J was that correct
Fl I know the context that this was the summary of his trip, if I read it and it didn't mention him
J If you'd like to look through that entire document, the name is not in there. He's referred to as a contact who does not have established reporting
Fl my context was it was Amb Wilson's trip, if it doesn't have his name verbatim, it may not have his name verbatim.
J W/govt's permission I will represent that the blacked out portions do not include Wilson's name.
JWas at this time when Bartlett came to you
Fl that's when he walked near me
J asks if it was INR memo
Fl I wouldn't know
J Did you see the doct that Bartlett had in hand. Do you know whether this was the doct?
Fl I wouldn't know one way or another.
J Bartlett is saying, "I can't believe…" He seemed to be, upset, annoyed?
Fl yessir.
J Did you say he says his wife sent him. You're saying that's the same thing Libby said four days earlier. You made no comment.
Fl I wanted to read the doct that Rice had given to me, when Bartlett came back, my first reaction was "I'd heard this before."
J what did you say to Bartlett, it would only take about 3 seconds to say oh sure I've heard that. He said to you and you don't say a word.
Fl one of the things I found in the govt is that you should finish what you start,
J Dan Bartlett is your boss.
Fl nominally my boss.
Fl the way the WH worked, I really reported to the president. Dan Bartlett would have a box above me.
J he was higher than you.
Fl I'm not sure I'd agree he made a statement to me, he vented out loud.
J So he wasn't just talking to you.
Fl he said it out loud.
J When you testified before GJ, did you say "I recall Dan saying to me, I can't believe, the next…"
Fl I heard him, he told me, I think it's all kind of the same.
J You didn't mean to let the GJ think he was saying it to you
Fl Bartlett said it, and I heard it. It's all one and the same.
Fl 4 seats in senior staff cabin.
J how many seats in the cabin you were sitting in.
Fl in the front some 10 seats, and 3 or 4 behind.
Fl people get up and walk around all the time. The people who typically sit in that cabin are nuclear football guy, personal aid, head of advance, photographer.
J Can you name one other person who was seated within earshot.
Fl No, I was sitting in my chair trying to read a document.
J Did you testify b4 GJ why you didn't tell Bartlett of your lunch. you responded, it didn't strike me as news.
Fl Yes sir. I think I also told the GJ what we just discussed as well.
J Now, the point you took away from Bartlett's statement was there was incompetence?
Fl my take was Bartlett was saying incomptence at CIA.
J You saw no reason why you couldn't tell anyone.
J All these people who would be seated in staff cabin, all employees of WH.
Fl Yessir, I hope so.
J David Gregory is WH correspondant at NBC news (flashes picture of Gregory). Did you recall at the gaggle when Rice was being peppered by these questions, Gregory was one of the questions.
2:39
J introduces transcript of gaggle. Going through questions asked in gaggle.
J Do you recall that all of the controversy didn't have to do with Amb Wilson. His claims were only one part of the problem you were facing about the credibility of the 16 words. One of the questions consistenly being raised was who cleared the speech. People talking about Foley and Amb Joseph. Did that cause some tension that week. Tension you had to get involved in trying to solve. That didn't have anything to do with Wilson.
Fl It was hard to tell what was attributable to one problem or another. It all kind of, as it always does, meld together as one big controversy.
J in the press gaggle that day, it all had to do with who cleared the speech.
Fl I was making a reference earlier about a report aired on CBS news which said CIA said President did know info was false and deliberately put it in speech even though he knew it was false. That was opposite to everything I was told.
J Do you recall if you could…Goes over the Condi statement–if we had known … "Dr Rice, it sounds as if you're blaming the CIA." That was David Gregory, right?
Fl I don't know.
J If you look down, it refers to David, does that refresh your memory.
Fl I think it's possible.
J Do you recall another David.
Fl I wouldn't remember if there was another David.
Ten minute break. This whole biulding is boiling hot. Here and the court room.
2:47
Waiting for the jury. Ari with his game face on.
Jeffress back up, talking about gaggle, talking about IAEA discovering the documents were forgeries. IAEA reported two months after SOTU. And Condi claiming she learned about it on MTP.
Fl I recall she was on some Sunday show. I recall the conversation coming up, particularly afterwards.
J When somebody in that high a position goes on Sunday show, do you brief them, she had not been prepared on Wilson.
Fl not by me.
J But high officials were being asked
Fl yessir, there was something in the air that spring.
Fl I can't remember when Dr. Rice went on what show when.
J But you were present at this gaggle.
Fl Correct
J whether before or after the gaggle.
Fl My belief the conversation…Bartlett's statement took place after.
J This gaggle was 12:15 local time. This was flying to capital of Uganda. And Pres had a meeting with Mr. Museveni, the President of Uganda.
J showing document with schedule. Refers Ari to the order of events on the 11th. Gives him another document, one of Ari's documents. July 11, 2003. Transcript of Museveni and Bush. J is trying to pin down the time of the meeting. Jeffress looking for a document that might place the time of Ari's leak.
J Your recollection of when you talked to these reporters was when. This event at 4 is after that event. Shortly after 3:00, shortly after 8:00 (AM) EST. Was there a third reporter?
Fl Tamara Lipper, Newsweek.
Fl my recollection is that she had walked off. Gregory and Dickerson.
J They were asking you questions. How did the information get in your speech, Bush was asked. Were the reporters asking you questions.
Fl No I volunteered it. Talking about bad week at WH, Why going after DCI Tenet, What I recall, in large part that report on CBS, plus the fact that I had heard it from two Admin officials, so I volunteered it.
J Clear memory of another conversation with Gregory.
Fl I remember Gregory saying what a terrible last week it was. I remember saying to Mr. Gregory, "If it wasn't this crap, it was some other crap."
J Did you have second thoughts about that word.
Fl PS' shouldn't use the word. I said, if you're going to use it, don't use that word.
J But no second thoughts about what Wilson.
Fl I don't recall whether it was on the record or on background.
J He'd be perfectly free to call NBC news? And Gregory worked for whom? Washington Bureau?
Fl works out of the WH. Tim Russert was head of Washington Bureau
J Another reporter was hearing the same conversatoin.
Dickerson, with his picture up.
J Dickerson worked for whom? Did these reporters… Do you know a reporter named Matt Cooper?
Fl Yessir.
J Did these reporters have telephones?
Fl on the airplane? Yes.
At least a little after 8 in the morning EST both of these reporters knew from you that Wilson's worked at CIA.
J putting War on Wilson up on the screen.
3:19
Fl Doesn’t recall Time story until story broke in September
J reviews the authors, notes Ari spoke to Dickerson.
J There was a gaggle that morning.
Fl Had Tenet's statement, Other question was did President still have confidence in Tenet.
J You were tasked with asking.
Gives gaggle to Ari.
J Did you have conversations with Harlow that day?
Fl I recall one the day before, after Dr Rice "shivved" Tenet, I filled him in, knowing the press would start calling him. I called him to let him know what Dr. Rice said. On July 12, did I talk to Harlow? I don't recall.
J How many times did you talk to Harlow that week?
Fl July 7 or 8, I'm being told by Bob Joseph that CIA did approve those words. He (Harlow) said CIA did not approve those words. I remember that conversation and the one I just referenced on the 12th.
J He felt the WH was blaming CIA.
Fl, Harlow was not pleased to hear that [that Condi had hung Tenet out to dry]
Fl What I recall is that in that statement–do you have that Tenet statement? Tenet said the official from Niger met with Mayaki.
J Did you and Bartlett have a discussion about reaching out to reporters. We talked about that CBS report. We should find out who else is writing this story. I said we should get this out to everyone we talk to about Tenet.
Fl I called Pincus at WaPo, I think I called someone at NYT. I can't recall what Bartlett did.
J Is it a fact that you and Bartlett agreed to contact several print and media journalists. Ari NYT and Wapo and Bartlett the Sunday talk shows.
J You did meet with the FBI on June 10 2004. Did you tell the FBI that Bartlett was going to contact the Sunday talk shows.
Fl I don't recall who I said he was going to call.
J One of the Sunday talk shows would be MTP. Who is the NBC correspondant?
Fl Correspondant? Anchor is Tim Russert.
J Walter Pincus–can you say what area he writes in?
Fl I called him bc, WH reporters taht covered this story. I was working off of who was covering the controversy. I knew he wasn't on the trip, so I could reach him.
J Did you tell Pincus that Wilson's wife worked at CIA.
Fl nossir. I would have remembered it if it happened.
J Immunity agreement? Is that something that your lawyers sought from Prosecutors and his team.
Fl I couldn't tell you the exact date.
I'm going to start a third thread now.
3:31



256 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
FITZ!!!
Damn. Thought I might get it.
Ari!!
Dinner!!
Popcorn, peanuts, red hots, cold beer?
Firepups–
Remember, if you appreciate the liveblogging (and I know you do!), remember, the Plame House is not free. The servers are not free. Let’s keep Jane and company focussed on doing their work, and not on worrying about the funds. I sent $100 this weekend (may the snail mail gods send it with all speed!), which was roughly my annual Sunday NY Times budget before I stopped reading dead trees. What can you give?
Hit the paypal link in the upper right, or snail mail
The Fire Dog Lake Company
8033 Sunset Blvd. #966
Los Angeles, CA 90046
Go Fitzie and Team!!!
Did Libby say anything to you to make you think the info was classified or protected.
Just curious — did Ari respond to this one before he described trip?
Tried to watch live feed of today’s Snowjob presser. It kept cutting off, but I did hear someone ask Snowjob (1)was the WH following the trial, and (2) was he glad he wasn’t press secretary in 2003! Snowjob’s answer to the first question was that “we’re not all atwitter about it all the time,” and he just laughed in response to the second.
I’ll bet he thanks the gods every day.
So many allusions to hogs in the last week:
hog wash; pig in a poke; when pigs fly; and, lipstick on a pig.
For future reference here are some unused ones: as worthless as as tits on a boar; as independent as a hog on ice; as common as pig tracks; even a blind sow finds an acorn every once in a while; and, you can’t make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear
Personally, I wish someone would call Scott McClellan, just for the comic relief aspect. I don’t think he has any knowledge of anything here that would be useful to anyone, but it sure would be fun to see him try to explain… anything.
I love this from Ari:
“Like a lot of things i said to the press it had no impact.”
What do you expect when you offer distortions and spin? The only impact is the splat of poop on the wall…
fnord.
The trial is going well so far, everything but the squeal…soon, very soon.
I take it this is probably a good thing since it seemed that Judge Walton was a little tougher on the Defense during the last day of voir dire.
Oops, Ari said “covert officer.” Gonna be awfully hard to unring that bell. My guess is that this is going to be a longish sidebar.
Peterr first posted this…but it needs to be posted each thread…
********************
Given the expected traffic here during the Libby trial, a few reminders to the regulars and words of welcome to newcomers might be in order. FDL’s comments are moderated, mostly to eliminate the mass spam that flies around the Internet. All comments run first through an automated spam filter, and if caught, are then checked by human moderators, because in addition to spam, the filters also catch regular comments from time to time.
To make newcomers feel a bit more at ease, here’s some info that will keep your comments from landing in moderation or otherwise clog things up and make life difficult for the mods:
1. Size matters. Long posts get automatically put in moderation and require the mods to set them free. If you want to use a post from elsewhere, don’t cut and paste the whole thing; just give us a link and post a snippet. It saves space here, and gives the original author the traffic they deserve on their site.
2. Words matter. Especially those words that appear in email spam. Creative use of asterisks in words like “ins*rance” or “vi*gra” will keep things from getting caught in the filters.
3. Links matter. If you put a comment in with more than two or three links, it will end up in moderation. If you absolutely, positively have to have multiple links, you probably want to split it into multiple comments.
4. Attribution matters. If you are posting a news item, give us a link so we know where it came from, how timely it is, and how credible it is.
5. Preview is your friend. Before you send that post, especially if you’ve used bold, italics, or inserted a link, check it out by clicking the preview button before you submit it. It saves on the cleaning bills.
6. Beware the ziggurat! That is, when you quote a comment that quotes a comment that quotes a comment, etc. the resulting nest can “bust the margins” of the webpage. To correct this, the mods have to go in and mess with the coding . . . it’s no fun, and can easily be avoided if you snip out some of the innermost comments of the nest or simply start a new comment and point back to the original with “Jane @ 25″ or some other referent.
Finally, and most importantly: Do not feed the trolls. It just encourages them, and makes life difficult for the mods.
If your comments do end up in moderation, don’t panic. The mods will see them, and free them up in short order. Comments that get held up in moderation, however, do NOT appear if you simply hit “Refresh Comments.” They come up when the entire page is reloaded using F5 or your browser’s “reload” function. Every so often, it’s worth reloading the page to see what might have been missed.
Welcome to the ‘Lake! The water’s warm, so jump right in.
***************
also… marcy timestamps her updates, and only updates every 15 minutes or so. In order to reduce demand on the servers, wait at least about 15 minutes after the previous update before “refreshing”
This is captivating stuff.
Thanks again, FDL for liveblogging and for giving us non-lawyers the rundown of what is happening.
Do I understand the prefixes for who is talking correctly?
P = Prosecution team member
W = Wells (Defense lawyer)
dunno how you indicate the judge
Fl = Ari Fleischer
M = Cathie Martin (Cheney’s former press secy)
Timmeh = Tim Russert, both before and after castration
Anybody else I’m missing for the tip sheet of who is who?
(Suggestion: it could be helpful to post the code prefixes at the top of each new thread. Unfortunately, some of us can only tune in once or twice a day, and it’s hard to keep up on who is who)
MSNBC story is a good rundown of precisely everything blogged on FDL today. For some reason, they didn’t mention Shuster’s phone going off (ha!) http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16864142/
Christy Hardin Smith @ 13
Why? Explain pleeze – and mucho thanks!
old gold @ 8
don’t forget this one: the defense arguments are hogwash.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 13
Why is “covert officer” significant?
old gold @
8
Only appropriate, given that we’re coming up on the Year of the Pig.
I think it was all the lying and non-answers, Ari.
B/Richmond @ 16
B/c he is being tried for perjury and not outing a NOC so they don’t want the jury to know her covert status.
P Your last day at the WH was when
Fl July 14, 2003
Fl The next I started my own business. Do you want to buy some Amway products?
Jane S. @ 21
Thanks.
Re covert officer questions:
Because it is a federal crime to knowingly “out” a covert officer. The crux of the matter, if you will. They were playing games with the life of a covert officer for political purposes. (Christy’s answer will be better…)
M.
Sorry; didn’t he just state before lunch that Libby told him Plame’s name and CIA office of employment and said “hush hush”? It doesn’t take “wildest dreams” to make classified connection, you don’t just make an off-the-cuff decision to “spread”. Something stinks.
Idiot or Slime? Vote now on our new reality show…
There’s Arguments.disagreements of whether she’s actually covert- I think teh consensus is that she was in a classified position, translating from covert to ‘regular’ CIA…
If she was covert, it opens up the IIPA aspect-”did they knowingly out a covert agent”, if so that ups the ante considerably…
Great stuff at the link wrt President George W. Bush’s trip to Senegal, South Africa, Botswana, Uganda, Nigeria, July 7-12, 2003
audio-pics-speeches, etc.
Schedule
Senegal – July 8
South Africa – July 8-9
Botswana – July 10
Uganda – July 11
Nigeria – July 11-12
http://www-sul.stanford.edu/af…..p2003.html
Here’s a quote for the pigology, one that sadly references the spirit of politics:
“Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig.”
It sends frissons of -well- pleasure through my body to realize that this arrogant, lieing, goebbel-ian prick is in a position where he has to testify in fear of perjury. All those gaggles…the humanity…
steve @ 26
I think because this trial is about perjury and obstruction, parameters were laid out about what could be said about Plame’s status. The defense lawyers are trying to keep out that Plame was a NOC b/c it might prejudice the jury that their client committed treason in addition to perjury.
Rich at 18 — Because Judge Walton already ruled on pretrial motions that Valerie Plame Wilson’s status is not relevent to the charges for which Libby was indicted — obstruction, false statements, and perjury. Its outside the scope of the charges. But having it come out of the mouth of the witness unasked, it’s going tobe hard for the jury to put that fact out of their minds — especially piggybacked onto the testimony that Craig Schmalls (the CIA briefer) gave on what he told both Libby and Cheney about the detrimental effects that outing a covert agent could have on that agent, her network and the assets that agent was running in the field.
Very interesting that Ari says he mentioned Plame (or, at least, “Wilson’s wife”) to John Dickerson, since Dickerson said Ari didn’t go that far — just suggesting that reporters look into who from the CIA sent Wilson.
Fitzmas @
22
Somehow, that “life coaching” thing didn’t work out, did it.
Here’s John Dickerson bloviating about the CIA leak investigation, hinting that he was an early Plame leakee, and complaining that he wasn’t called as a witness:
http://www.slate.com/id/2135554/
Why wasn’t Dickerson called? In part, perhaps, because Fitz didn’t want to tip everyone in the media to Ari’s deal.
Ari admits Scooter told him VP was CPD…so why wouldn’t it occur to him in his “wildest dreams” she could be covert?
Christy Hardin Smith @ 31
This won’t help defense with an appeal, will it?
Swopa @ 32
There must be signed orders, requisitions, air reservations, receipts. WIll they allow that out? Probably not.
We gotta get our VP’s straight. Sometimes it’s Darth ans sometimes it’s Mrs Wilson!
lobstakilla @ 35
lobstakilla @ 35
Because he said he didn’t know what CPD meant?
lobstakilla @ 35
The congenital lack of imagination that affects everyone in this Adminstration? No one could possibly conceive using airplanes as weapons. No one could possibly conceive that the levees might not hold?
Jane S. at 36 — Not likely. Judge Walton wil give a cuationary instruction and the defense counsel will have more than ample time to C/E Ari on the fact that he only read this in the papers and didn’thear it directly from Libby (unless, of course, he DID, in which case we’ll be having a REALLY long sidebar…)
The next day I started my own business in case anybody’s looking for a schmuck.
Darn , no inside scoop on any other aspects of the smear. I love that Fitz is keeping the case tight so he can win, but I would have liked a little extra. I guess his strategy is not to open the door for further testimony that he has regarding others. I remember Christy or LHP saying that on cross you can explore subjects brought up on direct, so I guess Fitz is keeping his secrets (at least for now) and guarding that testimony.
Sorry; didn’t he just state before lunch that Libby told him Plame’s name and CIA office of employment and said “hush hush”? It doesn’t take “wildest dreams” to make classified connection, you don’t just make an off-the-cuff decision to “spread”. Something stinks.
unlike Libby, who was initimately involved in National Security issues (including making visits to the CIA), there is no reason to assume that Ari understood the distinction that CPD represented in terms of classified employment.
As Ari explained in his earlier testimony, when he was told classified information, he was told that it was classified and he’d been cleared to know it. Because Libby didn’t say to Ari that Valerie’s position was classified, he had no reason to assume it was….
That being said, it remains difficult to believe that Ari had spent the weeks after the Novak article under a rock, and had no clue that Valerie’s “outing” had become controversial…..even if he wasn’t working in the WH any longer.
Nothing to add but wanted to say
Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! This is such a hoot. I’m having the time of my life! ac
“sidle” is nice.
So one day Scooter is telling Ari that Plame works in Counter-Proliferation, but that this information is “hush hush” and “on the QT” and the next day, after listening to Bartlett venting, he decides it’s no big deal to mention casually to three reporters because he’s now heard two SAOs talk about it?
Is he saying that when an SAO says “this is hush hush, superdoubleplusgood secret,” it means he’s supposed to tell the press about it as soon as he hears another SAO refer to the same info?
I find it hard to believe that Ari had no clue about Plame’s covert status when Libby discloses she’s with CPD. Hadn’t Ari “been around the block” at all???
lobstakilla @ 35
He thought she was Ms Moneypenny, rather than James Bond.
Christy Hardin Smith @
31
Thanks!
Christy Hardin Smith @ 31
That’s the point, isn’t it? They all can dance around the issue – but don’t you think the jurors are going to want to know about this? Isn’t it the Elephant in the room, no matter what the judge says? This information is out there – even if they don’t allow any witnesses to talk about it.
raven @ 38
Yeah I know, sorry, I realized how it looked right afterward.
I also missed if/where Ari said he didn’t know what CPD meant.
Just a reminder of what Rice said at that gaggle:
Can we google gaggle?
jeffreyw:
He thought she was Ms Moneypenny, rather than James Bond.
707!
Here’s the gaggle at the WH site.
[S.O.S. conjures up image of Senator Sam Ervin’s raised, bushy and wiggly eyebrows]
I guess if it’s the worst thing that happens today. . .no biggie!
lobstakilla @ 52
Any speculation, Swopa, on what Bartlett told Fitz and the grand jury? Does this blow his barn door down?
Re covert officer issue:
My bold. Doesn’t the bold get him off the hook? Also, Plame has already left the CIA, so “covert officer” at this point in time doesn’t matter to the jury. No?
Who else was within ear shot when Bartlett vented out loud about Plame sending Wilson and her being CIA? B..Bu..?
My $0.02 speculation about Ari….He knew Plame was covert when Libby disclosed Plame’s CPD status. However, he’s just been asked to lunch for the first time ever by the #2 person in OVP. He takes his marching orders, helps out Plame thinking that the administration will “fix” things. When CIA yelps and a quasi-independent criminal investigation starts, Ari gets wet feet and wants to claim that he didn’t know what CPD stood for!
QuickSilver @ 59
Probably not. He was reading the same memo that Armitage read, and (unlike Armitage) talking to another WH official.
Marksb @ 25
I agree completely. Maybe this will get clarified in cross, but it seems that Ari wants us to believe that since Libby didn’t follow the usual “this is secret, don’t use” and instead just said “hush hush” , that he was completely ignorant of Plame’s status. I don’t buy it either. He’s asking us to believe that he’s some thick/dull yokel who don’t know nuthin about no secret agents. Please. I’m thinking Wells is going to be not very nice to Mr. F.
tillie630 @ 51
Goes simply to motive to lie, does it not?
_
CHS
(Or anybody else that can answer it)
Why does teh defense keep bringing up that the witnesses didn’t meet with them? Isn’t this the 2nd or 3rd time it’s come up?
If there some tactical advantage to them doing it? Strategic advantage? And if not, why keep doing it?
(and wouldn’t it be great if Ari answered ‘Well, you’re client Lying made me go out have to get a lawyer, cost me thousands of dolalrs, etc etc all so you can deny he did something we all know he did)
Name That Tune: “Something in the air”
A. Phil Collins
B. ABBA
C. Tom Petty
D. Thunderclap Newman
E. Canary in Cold Mind i.e Harri Flushers
Is there any evidence that the OVP requested the trip that Wilson made?
BobbyG @ 65
I think Fitz crafted the case to define motive that is non-classified, in an effort to avoid the graymail issues raised by Libby’s defense…
John Eaton @ 68
Interesting. Though counter-intuitive, it does go to the heart of their strategy to put out there vigoriously the opposite of what is true.
steve @ 66
Christy will know better than I but I think that it is an effort to impeach the witness. You didn’t talk to us; you have something to hide. I wonder if they did talk to defense, does he not ask. He didn’t ask Martin so I am assuming that she cooperated. My husband is an attorney, I asked him (he is a former litigator who represented some white collar criminals) if the counsel of the witness would advise against it. He said that he wouldn’t have a problem with it.
Is it just me, or are the prosecution lawyers in the Plame-Wilson civil trial stockpiling ammunition as we speak?
I am curious, do you think Cathie Martin returned to work this afternoon after testifying?
And where do the Bush twins fit into this whole mess?
P Did you hear someone on AF1 make another reference to Wilson’s wife.
Fl Staff cabin, Dan Bartlett, Comm Dir, reading a different document. He said, “I can’t believe he or they are saying that the VP sent Amb Wilson to Niger, his wife sent him, she works at CIA. He said this in front of me.
P Would you characterize this as a conversation?
Fl Dan was venting. That became the second reference I learned, I overheard. I don’t recall who was there.
I call a little bit of bullshit on PJF, not in a bad way – but he’s making points for further prosecution, and cutting through later Grand Jury time and effort, by putting this on the record here, where it’s mostly irrelevant to the Scoots case.
lobstakilla @
35
Ari admits Scooter told him VP was CPD…so why wouldn’t it occur to him in his “wildest dreams” she could be covert?
yeah, that one hurt Ari’s credibility.
dqueue @ 69
Yeah but now that it is out there, it certainly can’t hurt his case with the jurors in finding cause to lie.
Re my # 60:
Walton’s instructions to the jury:
John Eaton at 68 — Yes — during one of the briefings from the CIA, either at the VP’s morning briefing or during a CIA meeting at Langley that the Veep attended, there was a question posed by the Veep about finding evidence and/or information on any attempts of Iraq to purchase yellowcake in Niger or elsewhere in Afica. That, as I understand it, was the genesis of the need to find an answer for Cheney…and the subsequent set-up of the trip. Cathie Martin testified briefly about that, as did Grenier, as I recall from last week. The DoD and also the Dept. of State asked questions about tis issue as well, but there were definitely questions that came from the VP’s office on it.
But wasn’t Ari a loaner in 2000 from some other campaign? I seem to remember he was working for someone else, ended up going to work for the GWB campaign, ended up as PS. So why i don’t think he’s a dull yokel, it’s also possible that he wasn’t an ‘old hand’. Maybe the Scooter’s, Wolfowitz’s, etc, who’s spent all their careers on teh fringes of the DOD, CIA, NSA, etc might know offhand what CPD was, and the classified aspects of that…
But it’s entirely possible that Ari wasn’t evil, just stupid…
John Eaton at 68: the story is that the OVP went back to the CIA and said, is there a problem with this yellowcake intel? So the CIA sent Wilson to Niger to check it out. OVP claims that they didn’t know that CIA had responded to its inquiry by sending Wilson to Niger, and that OVP never got a copy of Wilson’s report. Schmall’s testimony suggested that in fact the OVP DID get a copy of the Wilson’s report back in 2002, but it wasn’t clear. It would in fact be odd if the CIA sent Wilson to Niger in response to an inquiry by OVP, and then never told OVP the results of the trip.
I too find this “oops” testimony hard to believe. Is Ari blinking at all. Does he have on a straight face?
John Eaton @ 68
Yes! Matter of fact there is in the defense exhibits:
Via defense exhibit 421
This is from Craig Schmall’s e-mail after first being questioned by the FBI.
Something In The Air was a UK #1 single for three weeks in July 1969 for Thunderclap Newman.
It was in “The Magic Christian” and was played when the businessmen in bowlers and briefcases waded into the pool of shit and blood to fish out money. . .hmm is that relevant to this case?? Seems so!
beaugus kridderz @ 67
“Plame” pronunced plah-may? unliklely. Plamet or Plamait or Plamais, sure.
dqueue @ 69
Agreed, but, it’s implictly out there in the ether among the jurors (and the public at large). No gettin’ around it. When you’re having to subjectively give weight to someone’s cred, the huge implication that these dudes were playin’ around fast and loose with someone’s radioactive status is ineradicable.
Like commanding “Don’t dare even think about about Cheney’s snarl.” Impossible, once stated.
_
litigatormom @ 47
In this administration, it would not surprise me at all to see a mindset of “well, everyone seems to know about it, so it can’t be that secret.” They certainly didn’t seem to have any appreciation of why you don’t casually pass around classified information internally, even if you’re a Really Important Person. Maybe in addition to the remedial ethics training they supposedly got a while back, they could all be strapped in and forced to watch the WWII Private Snafu cartoon about how loose lips sink ships.
So! Bartlett says Wilson’s wife sent him, and Condi walks to the back of the plane and says “And you should ask the Agency at what level it was known in the Agency.”
She’s something else.
LOL! Me too, Pach — I keep expecting Ari to say, “Now David, you know it’s our policy not to comment on an ongoing investigation.”
And why he was dumb enough to show up at the courtroom the day he was going to be exposed. ;)
Unless this is really Ari’s attempt to bail out Libby by claiming (like Scooter) to have leaked when he really didn’t!
punaise @ 83
Perhaps he wasn’t sure about the pronounciation because he registered for his wedding gifts at “Tar-zhay.”
Christy Hardin Smith @ 77
So, it seems they sent the wrong guy. A Toady was desperately needed for that investigative trip to Niger. If only Wilson were a Toady – he was perfect for the job – all that Niger experience and connections. It would have been a slam dunk.
Just like that.
BTW-
“Hi” to our NSA surveillers. Your idiot coward megalomaniac boss still sucks.
_
CPD=Chicago police dept.Cheney’s a cop?More pigspeak-it’s like giving champagne to a pig
BobbyG @ 92
Oh, they probably know that better than anyone else already.
BobbyG is such an introvert – sigh.
Richmond @ 75
BobbyG @ 84
Definitely, a good point by both. Was Fitz planning on this? I don’t know. Libby’s defense worked hard to keep it irrelevant to the charges at hand. I presume it’s going to raise, at least, some yellow flags with the jury, especially since it’s coming up via multiple witnesses. Oopsie.
Ummmm, OK, I’m finding some of Ari’s testimoney a little hard to fathom. Right after the Plame Affair hit the airwaves, Rice was on all of the talkingheads programs on a Sunday and looked mucho tense. There was all kinds of wild speculation that whoever leaked the name was in big trouble. But for some reason, Ari doesn’t get nervous until September? Between July and September he is not nervous at all. He pays no attention to the media talking about this case. He just goes on vacation and doesn’t even think about it until September?
Does that seem a little far fetched? If Rice was visibly nervous at the beginning, why wasn’t Ari? Is it possible he’s a bit dense?
What’s the nugget? This other thing? What’s he holding back? This is fantastic! Finally, a witness with a memory.
Perhaps he wasn’t sure about the pronounciation because he registered for his wedding gifts at “Tar-zhay.”
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
Christy Hardin Smith @ 77
Yeah, it’s a classic Bush Administration lie — loudly claim that the VP’s office wasn’t responsible for Wilson’s trip as disinformation against the fact that it was in response to their request for information, and nobody ever said they were responsible for sending him.
From Wilson’s op-ed:
What BobbyG says.
Also, on June 10, 2003, in a response to Grossman about his questions to the INR about whether there was a trip involving an ambassador and did they send him, there is this in Defense Exhibit 71
The contents of Tab 4 are also included in this defense exhibit from the first day of trial! Check them out. I believe this is proof that they knew about the trip, and they knew they knew even if they chose to have forgotten!
All exhbits — prosecution and defense both are found here.
I’m waiting to find out what that “other event” was that Ari referred to. Anybody know? Guesses?
Do we know how Bartlett came to know about Plame?
Fl Rice was asked if she could declassify this information. Show us the reason why.
I’m *still* waiting for someone to show me how the Veep can de-classify – especially without the consent of the agency involved.
That’s one that’s been let sail through way too easily, imo
On Ari, I can’t remember the timing on this, but didn’t he change his POV after lunch (now more hesitant on the covert business? After someone spoke with him perhaps.
Wild speculation, but I wonder if that’s the reason why Judy Miller’s notes had ‘Valerie Flame’: ‘Plame as in flame’, not ‘Plam as in… um, Plam-ay’?
If I were writing it as a play, I’d be afraid I’m telegraphing the “nugget” and “other thing” way too much. I get the sense he’s baiting Wells. Is it an area he’s afraid to get into?
portia.vz @97 asks about Ari:
My initial reaction is: is it possible that he’s not dense? This is, after all, a man who served in the Bush White House.
Also, what struck me above was Rice in Africa saying to the reporters (on the 16 words etc): “Are you sure your done with this subject.” It is like she had prepared to reveal a particular prepared statement on this, and they weren’t asking the key follow up questions.
Christy Hardin Smith @
31
And so by this slip, it seems obvious that they all DID know she was a covert agent?
jayt @
105
Bush altered an executive order in March 2003 (interesting date, no?) and it’s that which Cheney cited when claiming he had authority to declassify.
Christie H-S
Ah .. for whatever reason, the light bulb has {finally} come on.
Cheney inquires about Niger buying the cake, CIA sets up trip. HOWEVER, limited number of people to send, hmmmmm?
So in fact Cheney did know a certain pool of people to be sent but has decided to dispell any knowledge it was in fact Wilson?
OR did Cheney through a meeting with Tenet at some point know it was already WILSON and has decided to play ‘dumb’ and play the public [and for that matter, the entire WHIG group of idiots]?
Zeppo @ 9
Remember, McClellan is the one that said Rove and Libby had nothing to do with the leak. A bald face lie. And SOMEONE or SOMEONES had to tell him to knowingly lie. It may not be evidence but it speaks to the credibility of those at the top involved.
nice!
jayt @ 95
Yeah, LOL, my “privacy horse” is SO outa the barn. Why, I’m even doin’ the (faintly ridiculous for my incipient geriatric ass) MySpace thingy now.
_
Ummm… “Nuclear football guy”? That’s the terminology? I haven’t heard that one before.
Re the CPD (operatives) vs. WINPAC (analysts) distinction:
At some point this will have to be explained to the jury, IMO, because Judy Miller’s notes from her date(s) with Libby say that Libby told her Plame worked for WINPAC:
http://www.time.com/time/magaz…..13,00.html
This is Pach on EW’s comp:
We’re in a bit of a break. It’s really hot in here so EW stepped out to the hall for some fresh air.
Lots of hot air here in the media room. . .
So now Wells is trying to make Ari look like he was sandbagging Bartlett by not telling him that “the wife” sent Wilson to Niger?
Even though Wells has tried to get every witness to agree that “the wife” aspect was unimportant? Even though Libby’s whole defense is that “the wife” was so unimportant that he plumb forgot that he told Ari about it BEFORE he learned about it from Timmeh?
zeppo @ 117
God these guys are A-Hs. Like starting nuclear war is simply a fumble. God spare us soon.
Richmond @ 109
I’ve always believed that the press did Rice a big favor by changing the subject. She really wanted to push this issue. She’s the one who brought Wilson into the gaggle and she changed the subject from the IAEA to him in order to do so.
I’d really like to know if she was lying about the fact that she learned of Wilson’s trip on George Stephanopoulos’ show. I find it hard to believe that her assistant, Hadley, was digging around to find out about Wilson’s trip in May, when Kristof’s column went to press, but that Rice didn’t know anything about it until Stephanopoulos asked her about it on June 8.
Ari is pretty amazing witness. He is so practiced at fielding questions, he hsas very little confusion about where the question is leading and he’s good clarifying his answer so his next is not a trap.
While I’m enjoying Fitz and Jeffress questioning Ari, I’m REALLY hoping we get to see “a Dick in a box.”
BobbyG @ 116
Dude, I got a feelin’ that *all* of our ‘privacy horses’ are out of the barn.
So be it.
Thanks Pach — thus far, it sounds as thought Wells has backed things down a couple of notches. Does it seem that way in person in terms of his courtroom demeanor?
litigatormom @ 120
Pach here: Jeffress is doing the questioning. I have not decided exactly where he’s going. Really, since they did not interview Ari before this time on the stand, I think they’re fishing as best they can, looking for a slip on recollection to impeach his credibility.
Sparkles the Iguana @ 118
Is WINPAC subsumed by CPD?
Kim @ 104
On the flight to Africa an official at the CIA e-mailed/faxed a report/memo(?)at Powell’s request to AF1 This is the document that had a mark in the margin to indicate Valerie Plame’s secret status. I don’t remember the exact wording but they all were aware of what it meant.
6 miles @113 – I like your plan A (Cheney sought someone in CIA, but didn’t nec know the name. Remember Africa doesn’t matter to them (except here to start war in Iraq).
Dover B – good points
Pach @ 119 “Lots of hot air here in the media room. . . “
Is Shuster one of those guys that wants EVERYONE to know when he gets a phone call. For god’s sakes, put it on vibrate.
Since you’re dishing, who are the top three blowhards?
Off topic – from Juan Williams interview earlier today with W, from Williams’s talk of the nation segment – essentially, W stated he feels very strongly he has the authority to make war on Iran without any further involvement of the U.S. Congress./
On Topic – Am I incorrect in thinking Fleischer is on the stand mostly for where this case might lead beyond Libby, rather than mostly re the Libby trial itself?
Pach here: Wells was a bit. . . scatty?. . . this morning. Seemed always to be shuffling papers, half phrasing then restarting his questions. The Cathie Martin cross seemd not to do anything of substance, and the inference they wanted to create for the jury was torpedoed fast by Fitz on redirect.
He basically showed she was not in the loop on lots of press strategy going on in OVP, thought Wells was trying to use her lack of knowledge of Plame press strategy, and lack of Plame in the talking points she created, to imply there was no interest in Plame.
Richmond @ 106
Great observation which reminds us … Please
DON’T FEED THE TROLLS
Neil @ 129
Pach here: Not really anyone that I would put in that category, but then again, there’s not a whole lot of free flowing chatter: everyone is so focused on details and testimony. But I have not been in the media room much lately.
I’d better get back upstairs. Laterz!
Christy Hardin Smith says:
January 29th, 2007 at 11:03 am
Rich at 18 — Because Judge Walton already ruled on pretrial motions that Valerie Plame Wilson’s status is not relevent to the charges for which Libby was indicted — obstruction, false statements, and perjury. Its outside the scope of the charges. But having it come out of the mouth of the witness unasked, it’s going tobe hard for the jury to put that fact out of their minds — especially piggybacked onto the testimony that Craig Schmalls (the CIA briefer) gave on what he told both Libby and Cheney about the detrimental effects that outing a covert agent could have on that agent, her network and the assets that agent was running in the field.
*
I don’t get that, Redd.
Doesn’t Plame’s NOC status go to motive — the great big 800-lb gorilla in the room motive — for Irving to commit perjury & obstruction? That these dimwits KNEW they where outing a NOC & did it anyway, and then Libby lied & obstructed in an attempt to cover it up & protect Cheney & the WH?
Why would Fitz accede to being constrained on on weaving Plame’s NOC status into explaining Irving’s motive?
Anyone interested in a friendly wager that it will be a much longer break than 10 minutes… sounds like the heat is being turned up in more than one way:>
emptywheel @ 132 “the inference they wanted to create for the jury was torpedoed fast by Fitz on redirect.”
Nice bit of lawyering that. FITZ!
The Pig will sing
a) How, could Judy [sleeping with Cheney] Miller not know that Plame was covert;
b) He was set up by Cheney and Libby to do their dirty work
c) that greater than 15 of the original diabolical 22 WHIGS are no longer with the Administration over their sloppiness as identified above on classified material ..
:) fabulous.
Richmond @ 121
It IS called the nuclear football. He gave the guy’s title, then said, “he’s the guy who carries the nuclear football.”
emptywheel @ 119
ahhh, slipped out for a beer and a smoke, did she? well-deserved! you guys so rock this — hello to all TradMed! THIS is how it’s done….
Ed*ard Teller @ 131
If W means Bush, and he was willing to talk with Juan on NPR, it means just how much NPR has declined in terms of “fair and balanced” of late and how “trustable” it now is to the Admin. Ditto for Juan.
hackworth @ 90:
So, it seems they sent the wrong guy. A Toady was desperately needed for that investigative trip to Niger. If only Wilson were a Toady – he was perfect for the job – all that Niger experience and connections. It would have been a slam dunk.
The story was also discounted by the local US Ambassador to Niger, as well as by the local 4 star general for that region who looked into it. It was not just Wilson, although he’s apparently the only one who heard the SOTU and said basically “Hey wait a minute, if this is what I think it’s about then we are being lied to.”
Thing is, Libby and Cheney were trying to build a case for war, and everybody knew it, and so it’s possible they didn’t ever send information that ran contrary to the coolaid, because speaking truth to power would have been a CLM.
zeppo @ 116
Actually I have heard the term before. It’s a term many administrations have used. I don’t who started it, but it may have orginiated as the Secret Service code word for the nuclear suitcase.
Neil @ 129
Don’t forget — Pach is co-opted, to use his own words, by having to be nice to these people (hi people!!)
emptywheel @ 139
Thanks. I’m curious who gave this item this title. A little like Reagan’s “peace maker missles.”
Dover Bitch @ 122
I agree about the Hadley connection but then Condi really is extremely incompetent and clueless so you never know.
portia.vz @ 97
Ari is beginning to strike me as dense. I can’t help but recall his appearances on tv before the war talking about bombing like he had a heart of ice. It strikes me that his skull may not absorb a lot as well.
Why would Fitz accede to being constrained on on weaving Plame’s NOC status into explaining Irving’s motive?
while Fitz has ceded establishing the FACT that Valerie was covered by IIPA, he plans to argue that one of Libby’s motive’s for lying was based on his belief that Val’s job was/may have been classified information. (”state of mind” is what is critical in establishing motive, i.e not the facts themselves, but what the Defendant perceives the facts to be.) That’s why Fitz wants to get the 312’s admitted.
keep’emhungry @ 133
Dammit – edit
If you’re impying that Richmond is a troll, you’re mistaken. If you’re not, then *I’m* mistaken.
Main point is valid however.
Scott Shane overheard singing in Men’s room:
Its gettin hot in here (so hot)
So take off all your clothes
I am gettin so hot,
I wanna take my clothes off
Ooow
Its gettin hot in here (so hot)
So take off all your clothes
I am gettin so hot,
I wanna take my clothes off
Richmond @ #141,
Yeah on both – Juan Williams interviewed Bush this morning. I’m not sure when the whole interview will play, but he discussed it for a 5-minute segment on TotN. A lot of softballs, but Bush was adamant about his perception he has all the authority he needs to make whatever war he deems necessary on Iran.
mui @ 147
I imagine if you lie all the time for a long period of time, it really messes up the hard wiring, and it is difficult to think without adding a subversion. After a while you begin to believe your own lies. (I bet there is scientific evidence for this!)
Hugh @ 145
I think as as NSA or SOS, you are correct. But I also think she’s diabolically talented at dissembling. She would have made a terrific PS.
Redshift @ 100
Here’s the document of the meeting asking Wilson to go: Tab 1 on defense exhibit 71
um, the suitcase with the nuclear launcher is kinda shaped like a football. not lots of fotos of it, but you’ll know it next time you see it….
Dover Bitch @ 153
POS.
-GSD
Good one.
gosh, I can’t believe I’m wasting bandwith to contradict Marcy, but it’s called The Football period, no nuke-u-lar, just “the football”
Richmond -
go to any of the myriad of fact based toobz sites for the 10 Major Personality Disorders – and you’ll find a motherlode of evidence
Ref: Richmond 145 “Nuclear Football”
The briefcase contains the authorization codes that the Pres would use to authorize release of nuclear weapons. The military officer who carries it was never referred to as the “nuclear football guy”; however, since well back to the 80s the briefcase was referred to as “the football.”
with a handle like zeppo, I thought you might be older. the nukular football is the case that a guy carries around with the “button” – ie launch codes for the Prez. ok, now I’m going to have those nightmares again.
Thanks for the info wrt “the nuclear football guy”. It just surprised me, as that term seems so…. frivilous for what it is actually referring to.
Like referring to Love Canal as “the kiddy playpool”.
Did I read it right? Did Condi really go to the back of the plane and pitch in on what questions the press should be asking in regards to Valerie Plame?
Richmond 152
Congnitive dissonance.
It’s smallish (bigger than a daytimer, smaller than a breifcase) and has all the nuke codes in it…And since you usally see the military aide carrying it around under his arm (if not cuffed to it) the nickname is kind of a no-brainer…
Jeffress seems to be focusing a lot of David Gregory. Even shows a photo of him. Will we be seeing his photo on the post office “Most Wanted” list soon?
I imagine if you lie all the time for a long period of time, it really messes up the hard wiring, and it is difficult to think without adding a subversion. After a while you begin to believe your own lies. (I bet there is scientific evidence for this!)
Ummm…. I’ve got an ex-wife who would be immensensely helpful in proving these theories.
She’s not scientific proof, but one hell of a little bundle of evidence!
The direct quote from Ari was the title, then, “he’s the guy who carries the nuclear football.”
Don’t beat up on me if it’s incorrect–I’m just the liveblogger.
TiredFed @ 160
Older than what? Moses? Oh, I know full well what it was referring to, but like I said earlier, I was surprised at the term.
You wanna swap Grouchoism? Probably not the correct forum, tho.
zeppo @ 161
Although it is usually handcuffed to the SS or whatever guy carrying it, I’ve heard it has a unique shape so it isn’t confused with other briefcases around the POTUS.
Liberal-at-large @ 135 Why would Fitz accede to being constrained on on weaving Plame’s NOC status into explaining Irving’s motive?
Bit by bit, piece by piece. Thus indctment is narrowly defined. All Fitz needs is what is necessary for a conviction here. If Fitz gets his conviction, we’ll see where it takes him.
Thanks everyone on the football. Of course – a brief case can take any number of forms, and this can be changed over time (from blue faux croc to patent leather, from rectangular to stream lined). Why it was given the shape of a football, not germaine here, but I can’t imagine it was to try to hide what it really was. Just a funny, strange tidbit in all this. Reminds me of Huizinga’s Homo Luden’s – play is VERY serious business.
emptywheel @
167
and one helluva liveblogger you are, feeding our need!!
Ref zeppo’s 160
Probably derived from the military black humor — other examples —
Old SAC motto “Peace is our profession.”
Nuclearr tipped missile — peacemaker
F-104 fighter (prone to crashes) — “widow maker”
emptywheel @ 167
marcy…you’re more in danger of being hugged to death than beat up on!
((((((((((((((((Marcy))))))))))))))
Thank you for your tireless efforts EW!
How do you folks sit for so long? My butt is beginning to numb out.
Gonna have to switch to the drafting table just to stand.
kristinejoy @ 163
Yes. You are right. And is Ari’s seeming style of speaking – short, jagged, abrupt, shifting – in keeping with this?
Edward @ 159
Am I the only one who is reminded of Dr. Strangelove?
That is the correct title for it – the briefcase with the nuclear launch codes follows the CnC wherever he goes. I assume it is referred to as a football because it is handed off to 3 guys on 8 hour shifts. Non-issue.
emptywheel @ 167
we got the ball, so let’s go let’s go
we got the ball, so …..let’s go!
The whole building is boiling hot? Hmmmmm, must be roast pork steamin’ all the way from the Nav*l Absurdity residence….
’cause if you haven’t read it, you gotta check out Froomkin–back and he brought his A game…
Unraveling U-No-Whooooooooooo
6 Miles from Ovalus Corruptous @ 138
Which Cheney was she fucking,Dick,lynn or Mary?
Empty -
should have done this before trial started -
allow me now to go on record with request for pre emptive apology for any of the stupid ass/malinformed shit that shows up here under my name.
you are doing the Lord’s work gal – and I have a dirty house, starving family/cat, and dearth of clean laundry to prove it !:)
Seems like WaPo got it right:
Fleischer Tells Jury That Libby Told Him About Plame
Wordsmith @ 176
You need this: Ergopod 500, Surf the Internet in Bed.
TeddySanFran @ 172
Please, PLEASE EW – I wasn’t beating up on you. You are brilliant with this. But I was commenting on a government system that would call the nuclear code book container a “football.” Sounds like the beginning of an (old style) Woodie Allen movie, complete with cheer leaders in short skirts humping the key players.
TiredFed @
160
What’s your best one? And how close were you before you woke?
the term goes back to the 60s IIRC (yes, I’m that old).
Nuclear football.
Richmond @
37
IIRC, Ambassador Wilson went on his own money, pro bono. It looked like a visit to old friends/colleagues. It was ideal cover and also the action of a good citizen. Therefore, no tracks.
And think of this: further discussion of Mrs Wilson’s status may prejudice further court cases or allow defense to prepare for the trial of someone who is not involved in this case. So Wells may be fishing for infor o help his *next* client.
Richmond:
Yes. He doesn’t want to talk about why, or reconstruct his motivations. Too painful, perhaps? Just enough of a dilemma to cause cognitive dissonance….one of the most misused terms in psychology, IMHO.
A tiny bit of housekeeping: this post is currently tagged as Uncategorized and should probably be Libby Live-Blog. Fixing it will ease the job of those who later go back to try to piece together the story.
Boy, am I REALLY sorry that I asked about that nookular football thing.
My humble apologies to all.
Now, let me get back to revitalizing my precious bodily fluids…..
Wells seemingly created the opportunity for Fitz to leave the jury, after redirect, with a very clear impression that Cathie Martin was in charge of the official media strategy vs. Amb. Wilson while Scooter and Cheney handled the dirty work. I don’t think that was his intention.
Und zen, see, we’ll use zee missle silohs for underground survival camps. Of course, all of us vill be included. And zee women, they will be the most biologically correct specimens…
Amazon sent me an email this morning notifying me they are shipping my order,which includes one copy of Anatomy of Deceit: How the Bush Administration Used the Media to Sell the War and Smear a Critic, tomorrow. Now, I’ll have an excuse to ignore my responsibiliites from 5 PM EST when court recesses until 9 AM EST when the jury comes back from their steak and egg breakfast.
Any chance Marcy is up for a Book Salon thread after all the evididence is heard and while the Jury is deliberating?
IIRC, Ambassador Wilson went on his own money, pro bono. It looked like a visit to old friends/colleagues. It was ideal cover and also the action of a good citizen. Therefore, no tracks.
the government paid his expenses, but Wilson was not paid for his services. IIRC Wilson travelled officially as an envoy of the state department, and told all of his contacts that he was gathering info for the government…he had “no cover”
Christy & Jane – FDL loading verrryyyyyy slowly this pm. I just kicked in some $$$ (paypal). Use it towards bandwidth, DC, or whatever else you need. Thanks for all the great work by the entire FDL Community!
hackworth @ 90
Exactly BushCo M.O. Recall Rice’s congressional testimony concerning Richard Clarke’s book: “Mr Clarke seems to think he was more important than he was…” Rice is too much of an idiot to pull that shit off.
p.lukasiak @ 197
This sounds more like it.
Interesting how Jeffress asked Ari is ‘one other person was in ‘ear shot’ of Bartlett’s venting instead of asking, was ‘one other person “there” (Bush) Ari can’t attest to the former but probably could to the latter.
hackworth @ 178
No, it is very Dr. Strangelovish. It’s really creepy thinking some guy in Chimpy’s entourage clutching a nukular suitcase to his chest to be used at Chimpy’s “discretion.”
hahaha. tomorrow is Dick Cheney’s birthday! Happy Birthday, Dick, from Scooter and Ari!
Excellent coverage, Marcy. Thank you very much for your work here.
clueless at 198:
I suspect the DOS villians are at it again – like last week.
Fleischer: yessir, there was something in the air that spring.
He really likes saying that, doesn’t he.
Did Fleischer play football in college?
[Mod Note; Please be careful with the zigs, no more than two nested quotes.]
Wow, this “10 minute break” is taking on Grateful Dead proportions (”Will the crowd make room for the narcan delivery so the band can resume playing? Thanks for you patience and cooperation.”).
hackworth @
178
Every time I see Dick Cheney, I think just that, though it is always difficult for a producer or director to contemplate a re-make of one of the greatest films of all time….
cbl @
183
Dearth Evader
Sparkles the Iguana @
206
Twas the season of Treason…
mui @ 202
I’m sure the rest of the world sees a similar metaphor.
clueless @ 198 Christy & Jane – FDL loading verrryyyyyy slowly this pm. I just kicked in some $$$ (paypal). Use it towards bandwidth, DC, or whatever else you need. Thanks for all the great work by the entire FDL Community!
Most likely a result of DOS attack or servers being hammered by refresh – CPU and NIC congestion.
Richmond @ 200
He didn’t need a cover IMHO. Niger is a small country and everyone knows everyone anyway, & he knew Niger officials and they knew him, or at least that’s the impression I got from joe Wilson’s book.
It’s really creepy thinking some guy in Chimpy’s entourage clutching a nukular suitcase to his chest to be used at Chimpy’s “discretion.”
Every president does this, just like they have a pohtog with them in case they keel over and die.
TiredFed @ 203
The evil side of Aquarius.
Mine is Wednesday, the good side of Aquarius. ( Sorta)
Lol.
cbl @ 183
(holds hand up)
Guilty as charged. The housework is going to have to wait, FDL’s liveblogging from Prettyman!
-S
p.s. I can just buy more clean underwear, can’t I?
…maybe he (flushers i.e. something in the air) was earning extra money writing for Phil Collins instedd of locking helmets on the nuclear gridiron during school
Check out these hit rates here at the lake. LINK
Btw, we’re in a sidebar.
punaise @ 210
Pour a can of tuna on your chest, call the cat over, and be done with it.
In referring to Dick Cheney, Bush claims Cheney is a “glass is half-full” kind of guy.
Seeing that the last thing in the world Dick Cheney would appear to be is an optimist just what is the glass half full of:
1) Scotch and water
2) Blood and Iron
3) Vi*gra and P*xil
4) Shattered lives and flowing blood
5) Shit
-GSD
double gray goose apple, shaken not stirred please
Fitzmas @ 73
I think Cathie Martin went to get some spa treatments and rejuvenate. And exfoliate.
(The Bush twins did the same, even though they are not following the trial at all.)
joe @ 215
I’ve heard, but don’t get me cussing the Supreme Court now.
Strategerie @ 217
be charitable and pick up a few pair for Libby.
I received EW’s book today & someone asked on the previous thread my date of order. Answer 1/15. Mine came from Amazon’s warehouse in Lexington, KY. I’m about 40 minutes south of Lex.- so I guess that’s why I have mine already.
Upstairs;
http://www.firedoglake.com/200…../#comments
Re: Slow loading….
I came back from the kitchen and it wasn’t loading at all. It’s sad…..I was about into full panic mode.
For your listening pleasure, this dedication to Attys Wells and Jeffress from Firedogs everywhere.
Welcome Mr Sting and the Police!
Thought you might like this one, Christy.
Going back to when Fl used the word “covert.”
Isn’t that word pretty significant. There’s a big difference in telling who she was being unauthorized release of classified info versus outing her as a covert agent. I think the penalty for the latter is much greater than the former.
Regardless of Scooter’s outcome — someone out there is still guilty of outing a covert agent. And if that’s Cheney isn’t that an impeachable offense?
..TeddySanFran @ 184
Froomkin today:
“Fleischer’s testimony is critical to Fitzgerald’s case: as the prosecutor laid out this week in his opening statement, Fleischer has said that Libby told him over a White House lunch on July 7, 2003, that Wilson’s wife worked at the CIA and made a point of describing this information as ‘hush and hush.’ Fitzgerald used that account to undercut Libby’s grand-jury assertion that he was surprised and ‘taken aback’ just three or four days later when, he claims, Russert told him about Wilson’s wife. ‘You can’t learn something startling on Thursday that you’re giving out Monday and Tuesday of the same week,’ Fitzgerald said.”
Game, set, ma…?
(*sound of Swopa’s head exploding*)
It must have been Bartlett who leaked to Pincus, then.
punaise @ 225
Ah, he must have loving ladies to do that, e.g. the wife, Judy Miller, (any other takers among the ladies?)
Please forgive OT. Hoping it’s o.k. since Marcy’s currently continuing on new thread upstairs.
Breaking sad news for horseyfolk:
Barbaro is gone. Euthanized today.
Details at Huff.Po.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200…..NlYwNtdHM-
p.lukasiak says:
January 29th, 2007 at 12:01 pm
Thanks!
Oh-oh; it’s happening again.
Shit! I got the day off
So THIS is where the whole “Plame sent Wilson” originated.
Can someone please help me clarify something (and I think this is a very important point that doesn’t seem to be highlighted)?
My understanding is this:
1 – VP’s office sends a request to the CIA to look more closely into the matter.
2 – The meeting at the CIA discussing the issue, which Plame was not present at, it was mentioned that Plame’s Husband, Wilson might be a good candidate to go
3 – CIA asks, informally, of Plame if her husband would be willing to go. Plame passes on the request to Wilson.
Thus we see how:
1. Wilson would say Cheney sent him.
2. VP’s office would deny sending “him.”
3. Why Ari would say that “His wife sent him.”
This has always driven me nutz.
Ari actually said, ’shivved’?
Thanks again FDL for providing this incredible blog.
Ref:
Simp”s 238
… that’s the only time line that makes sense.
lina @ 205
That’s OK – I still wanted to give some $$$ to FDL, whatever the use. The slow load just gave me an excuse to do it NOW!
Wordsmith @ 176
Hmmm….do you also go by the name Donald Rumsfeld?
Rummy work(ed) standing up, dontcha know.
Jane S. @ 127
Is WINPAC subsumed by CPD?
I don’t know, sorry.
steeelthing @ 239
And thanks again steeelthing, for being a major FDL angel. All Americans are in your debt, especially those of us reading here.
Sparkles the Iguana @ 244
No. Winpac is the analysis counterpart to CPD (which is in operations).
>It’s disorienting to see Ari Fleischer answer this many qustions in a row without dodging, weaving, fogging or lying. Bizarre indeed!
See what happens when you put ‘em under oath.
Cheney, Rove, and Novak next, please.
zeppo @ 117 “Nuclear football guy” –
The “nuclear football” is actually a briefcase containing all the top secret codes for launching nuclear attacks. For obvious reasons, it is always kept only a few steps away from the President, even when he travels on Air Force One. It is carried by a military aide (Fleischer’s “football guy”). In fact, the aide is probably handcuffed to it for security purposes, hence holding it like a football is probably the most comfortable way to carry it.
tillie630 @
51
Could defense use this as grounds for a mistrial?
Bob in HI
Pax et Bonum @ 28
But in this case the “pig in the poke” has been taught to sing! :-)
Amazing what those Irish accordion players can do!
Christy Hardin Smith @ 31
As Walton said the statement can only go to the state of mind of this witness (and I imagine others). It might seem to a juror that if Fleisher drew the conclusion that Plame was “covert” that others with even more information may have had reason to CONCEAL their leak or (rather than ask for immunity) obstruct the search for justice.
As they always say in those TV dramas…”Goes to motive, yer honor!”
But I can also see that Ari’s testimony might raise issues as to whether it might be reasonably construed that those who were aware of Plame’s status in the Counter-Proliferation Division (i.e. those more familiar with National Security issues) would reasonably have inferred that Plame was COVERT or in a highly protected classified status.
pseudonymous in nc @
107
I’m only at 107 so far, but the most logical conclusion to draw from the mispronunciation “Plamay” is that he heard someone pronounce it like that. But, who? Someone oughta ask him.
Bob in HI
Jane S. @ 127
No, very different animals. On occassion the CPD (which is in the Directorate of Operations) will acquire FIELD INTELLIGENCE that would be passed on in reports to WINPAC.
But the Directorate of Intelligence is not involved in Field Collection of Intelligence. They evaluate it, integrate it with other data, and make judgments regarding validity.
THEY ARE ANALYTICAL.
The Directorate of Operations are th “spooks”…those that make contact with sources in the field, spy, or are involved in operations that interrupt or infiltrate the activities of “bad guys”.
The COUNTER-Proliferation Division would be involved in gathering the raw information on WMD’s, particularly as they relate to the spread of nukes, biological and chemical weaponry to rogue nations and terrorists. They would also be involved in Operations to stop the flow of materials or information to these groups, working sometimes with other Operations groups of allied foreign powers.
The interception of the boat of centrifuge and other highly tooled machine parts from Malaysia, via Pakistan, to Libya was a CPD operation.
The two Divisions may interact, usually by meetings or at the behest of the Director CIA or other Sr. CIA Officers. For example, after Cheney told his CIA briefer that the CIA needed to look further into the reports of 500 tons of yellowcake that were rumored to have been sold by Niger to Iraq, the briefer requested that the CPD and WINPAC provide more specific info. that might verify this. Both Divisions thought that the agency could obtain more info. if the Agency sent someone with contacts in govt at the time of the reported “deal”.
Here is where I get a bit confused, though. I think that in WINPAC there are non-CIA analysts as well. There are folks in it from the INR (State Department Intelligence)…so it’s somewhat of a multi-agency group.
Someone in the CPD requested that Plame approach her husband to undertake a mission similar to one he had done in 1999, where he was sent to Niger to investigate another rumor that IRANIAN officials had contacted Nigerien Gov’t Officials about obtaining “yellowcake”. On that occassion Wilson actually established an actual contact. In addition he discovered that PAKISTAN had also approached Niger about smuggling in Uranium. So apparently, Wilson, and his sources had some level of credibility with people in the CPD and CIA analysts in WINPAC.
Wilson was escorted to his “meeting” by Plame (who didn’t stick around…but a second-hand INR report said she “convened” the meeting). There seems to have been some fairly Senior folks in the Directorate of Operations, there, such as the head of Africa Operations, perhaps McLaughlin, and several WINSPAC representatives.
At Wilson’s briefing/interview there was debate and discussion about the benefit of the mission with the INR folks in WINPAC stating that Wilson’s trip would be redundant (with what the State Department could already find out from Nigerien officials), and because the Nigeriens would likely be unlikely to reveal information if they were themselves involved, or conversely would want to curry favor with the US and say what they felt the US Administration might want to hear.
Basically it was agreed that Wilson would go, and meet his contacts from PREVIOUS NIGERIEN GOVERNMENTS, but only (at Wilson’s request…obviously a man unwilling to step on diplomats toes) if the US Ambassador in Niger agreed.
So while WINSPAC interacts with the CPD the latter is by no stretch of the imagination a subordinate to the analytical wing. The CPD is very much under the auspices of the Directorate of Operations.
BTW Given that Plame was the one to actually INITIATE the first mission by he husband back in 1999, some have speculated that means that she was either involved in CPD interdiction or intelligence gathering in either IRAN or PAKISTAN.
Muzzy @ 201
Yes, exactly who was sitting in the cabin within earshot of Bartlett’s shout?
Bush, Rice (who then goes and says to reporters that they should look into who sent Wilson), and others?
Dickerson has posted his observations from the trail for Monday here:
http://www.slate.com/id/2158157/entry/2158492/
He says Ari did not tell him that Wilson’s wife worked at CIA and that he learned it from Matt Cooper later in the day. Reputedly Matt learned it from Karl Rove–this would fit nicely into the Libby contention that he is being set up…or not.
In any case, I think that Dickerson will be called by the defense since he has come up in testimony and may be able to bolster the defenses theory that Libby is being setup…which doesn’t, however, explain why memory lapse was the earlier defense…oops.