
Hey, look at the exploding pig in the poke cartoon graphic I found! Or perhaps "pig in the poke to stay out of the pokey"?
If you don't know the reference, Patrick Fitzgerald described the process of offering Ari Fleischer immunity "buying a pig in a poke." We'll see whether this particular pig in the poke will be "da bomb."
A reminder of housekeeping rules: This is not a transcript. I'm getting as close as I can get. But trust me, I'm not a court reporter!
Also, I'll try to post update times. I've been updating every 10-15 minutes (usually at convenient breaks that will drive you crazy). Try to save the servers by updating around the time I'll actually update.
The professional liar is swearing to tell the truth.
Ari Flesicher. Not wearing glasses, he looks balder than he used to be.
Fl I have Ari Fleischer Communications, Strategic advice on communications. WH PS from 2001 to 2003.
Fl My job was to speak for the president, to explain what he was doing and why and to defend the WH if there was a controversy.
[I'm going to use P--I think this is Zeidenberg, I'm not postiive]
P how would you do this
Fl I would go to meetings, send other people to meetings. I'd talk to press a variety of ways every day. some formal and informal.
P what do you mean, formal and informal.
Fl Briefing and gaggle. Briefing, on camera, take questions. A second, less well known. Gaggle, on the record but they didn't allow cameras. I'd brief the press 2X a day.
P what does it mean when you say, "on the record."
Fl Reporters have free game to use it as they see fit. But there're no cameras.
P Did you also meet with the press on an informal fashion.
Fl meetings with reporters, conversations where they'll just call you. Talk to them. Meet with reporters on background. There were regularly scheduled meetings on background. My area of the WH the press can come and go as they please. Every day reporters would pop into my office.
P As Press Secretary did you have your own sources of information.
Fl principal source was president, the only way to be PS, but others, incl VP, Cabinet members, COS, NSA, Deputy NSA, some of them would give me informatoin. You learn that you have to listen to a wife variety of people so what you say is just as accurate as can be.
P have you testified previously.
Fl Yes
Fl January 2004, February 2004, September 2004.
P Did you answer all questions put to you?
Fl No sir. First time, I said I would refuse to cooperate unless I was given immunity as a result of what I had done.
P Did you get grant of immunity from govt.
Govt exhibit.
12:08
Fl reading from Immunity order, cannot be prosecuted for underlying issues in this matter.
P Just so its clear, what your understanding, what can you and can you not be prosecuted for?
Fl, I'm not a lawyer, I cannot be prosecuted for what I did with info I was provided but I can be prosecuted for what I say.
P so if you're not truthful, you can be prosecuted for that.
P I'd like to direct your attention to spring summer 2003. Can you tell about SOTU given by pres in January 2003, what it was, what was the significants.
Fl SOTU a major address, it's typically the address that the most people will ever watch, important for the President to define what he wants to do, January 2003, period leading up to Iraq, very important event to talk to American people, from Bush's point of view about why we might go to war with Iraq.
P in the next couple of months. Did a controversy arise over a particular sentence.
Fl One sentence which as I recall [repeats 16 words] President did not name a country, he said Africa. Part of that was based on forgeries. So I was asked, does the Pres still stand by it.
P response to these questions?
Fl Spring 2003, Yes, there was other evidence, even though part turned out to be wrong.
P late spring, beginning of May, do you recall press accounts which discussed an envoy who went to Africa?
Fl Sometime in spring, something in the air, a couple of things that were written that reexamined these 16 words, and said that info WH had used was wrong in its entirety.
P July 6 2003, an op-ed written by Joseph Wilson, former Ambassador
P can you tell us about that day and article.
Fl came out in op-ed, envoy had previously been raised in the spring, had his name attached, President must have twisted the intelligence, the envoy was challenging honesty and accuracy and now he had put his name on it what was previously in the air.
P July 6, do you remember what day you went to Africa
Fl Monday July 7.
12:15
P Monday July 7, were you asked questions that morning regarding the charges, can you tell us about that?
Fl in that gaggle, a reporter asked "what's the WH's reaction." There's zero, nada nothing new here, other than we now know the name. I added the VP did not send this person, CIA sent on his own volition.
P further questions about 16 words?
Fl later, given this oped, on that question I had been previously told not to repeat the WH's "we're standing by the 16 words."I knew the ground was shifting, the worst place to stand as PS is where the ground is shifting. I punted, I said sort of yes and no. And said I'd have to get back to him.
P Lunch on July 7.
Fl I had announced I was going to be leaving, "Spend time with family." Shortly after Mr. Libby asked to go to lunch.
P enters govt. exhibit, schedule for that day.
12:00 lunch with Libby
P was it routine to have lunch engagemnts.
Fl typically I would eat at my desk.
P had you ever had lunch with Mr. Libby
Fl no sir
Fl our relationship good, I liked Mr Libby, I did not consider him as a source, when I asked him questions, he would tell me to ask Dr. Rice NSA.
P notwithstanding your relationship with Libby was good.
Fl yes
P where and who was present?
Fl just Libby and me
P was anything discussed
Fl my plans what I was going to do in the private sector. Talked about sports, football, both fans of the Dolphins. I don't remember if I brought up or Libby brought up the briefing. I said I got asked about Wilson. I said what I was asked by the OVP to say. What I recall Libby saying to me, reiterated that VP did not send Wilson. Amabssador Wilsongot sent by his wife, she works at CIA, Works in CPD, I recall that he told me her name. This is hush hush this is on the QT.
Schuster's Hail to Victors going. People pissed.
P Context
Fl I was asked about the briefing.
P What word did Libby use when he described Wilson's wife.
Fl I remember him saying she works at CIA at CPD.
P Did you know what it meant.
Fl not in specific, I don't know enough about CIA inner structure to know what it means.
P her name, how did he describe her name
Fl I believe he said Valerie Plame
Fl the news that VP had not sent him, it was the first time I ever heard it.
P what did you understand Libby to mean by hush hush
Fl I thought it was kind of odd. My sense was Libby was saying it was kind of newsie, no one knows.
P did you understand that it was classified
Fl absolutely not. There's a very strict protocol when classified info is spread, my experience, when someone conveyed info that I was authorized to hear, it was always, "this is classified you're authorized to hear." When it's oral, people always say, "this is classified you cannot use it."
P What was your understanding of purpose of bringing up the wife?
Objection Sustained
Sidebar.
12:24
Ari looking up, not focusing on anything. Sometimes using his hands to speak.
P Did you take from the comment about the wife that there was some improper comment
Fl My thought was that there was nepotism. That was what I thought I was hearing.
P Did you feel there was any restrictions. If we can approach.
Sidebar.
Ari making a face, a bit of a frown. Drinks water. Rubs hands together. Okay, he's beginning to look uncomfortable. Now trying to listen in on sidebar.
Walton: It's 12:30 we'll break for lunch, don't talk about the case. Have a nice lunch.
I'll start a new thread after lunch.
Related posts:





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Fitz!
GO FDL! Thanks emptywheel!
Your etymology moment: a ‘pig in a poke’ was a suckling pig sold sight-unseen in a burlap sack, which could easily be substituted for a wriggling cat. On opening, the cat would then be let out of the bag, leaving one holding the bag.
Hang him high!
#4 – these days that’s pretty good!
Rules of the Road, as posted in previous live blog threads (thank you, Peterr!)
What a trial for bloggers to be in on! It sheds light on the very reason that so many became bloggers–the message control exerted by the WH on the “free” press.
Fitz!
it is soooo hard not to push the refresh browser button! arrgghhh. I want to know now! Not wait. Still must be a good boy. Excellent job by all involved.
Whaddya mean ‘no new comments!?’
I’m ready – isn’t that all that’s necessary?
Poke the pig with a sty in his eye and make ham fucking sandwiches!
Indict with the ham sandwich.
Marcy rules!
I know Ari got a lot of flack for registering his 2002 wedding with Target, but he did get everything on his wish list, including three 12-cup Bundt pans:
http://www.whitehouse.org/feed…..istry.html
Here’s hoping Ari gets everything he wants, and deserves, today.
QuickSilver @ 13
This is sounding an awful lot like the Betty Crocker award discussions last night. Hmmm. Wonder if he got one!
Fl: Yes, there was other evidence, even though part turned out to be wrong.
I hope this gets fully pursued – all of the nuke evidence, Niger and not.
All this does is reaffirm my opinion of Ari Fleischer as ’scumbag’ with some finely placed adjectives.
I love the reference to Ari’s occupation as “professional liar”. This guy, like Achmed Chalabi and Condoliar Riigghht, is one of the most obvious liars going. You can look at this guy and listen to him and know he knows he’s lying.
I hope instant karma gets Ari.
Question for Ari: Was Jimmy Jeff Gannon Guckert one of the reporters who would pop in on you daily? What can you tell us about this shill with security clearance, etc.? Was he a personal friend?
Right out of LA Confidential. If no one in the courtroom smiled at that….
Ha!
spread it guys!
Yaayyyy!!!!
Go Fitz. Just had to de-lurk. Hope I don’t clog the toobz.
This is riveting…must get some work done, must get some work done…really, I must get some work done and come back later.
So glad to hear I have something in common with Schuster — Hail to the Victors ringtone. Gotta love it!
Libby: Ya see, there’s this dame, named Plame, ya see. She’s a spook, a spy, a secret agent see…
-GSD
Evil Parallel Universe @ 19
That’s what I muttered when I read that, what is this LA Confidential? Where IS Kevin Spacey.
hackworth @ 18
Yup, that a way!
nice timing on the 12:@4 update: Objection, sustained. Sidebar.
Leave us hanging, much.
GSD @ 23
LOL — pretty funny!
OT.
Will the US and Iraqi governments bury the 200-300 dead Shiite fighters in a Saddam style mass grave?
Will they then dig them up in a year and claim it was another of Saddams mass graves?
-GSD
Must. Not. Refresh.
scribe @ 26
I think EW is doing this in purpose!!! It is like the commercial break on the T.B. She should just say, now time out for our sponsors, please go up and do 3 dozen ringy dingies before we come back on air.
Having posted the link, I’m now wondering if that Target list itself is legit. (There’s a date at the bottom of January 2007; his wedding to Rebecca Davis was in 2002.)
Is it a reposting of the original Target wish list, or a reworking by http://www.whitehouse.org (which has a satirical edge)? I’m not sure, though I remember the Target marriage registry story got coverage. My apologies if I made a mistake here.
Froomkin is up if people need something to do instead of refresh–
http://www.washingtonpost.com/…..on/columns
Nice that the Bush Administration has a specific protocol for spreading classified information:
“There’s a very strict protocol when classified info is spread, my experience, when someone conveyed info that I was authorized to hear, it was always, “this is classified you’re authorized to hear.” When it’s oral, people always say, “this is classified you cannot use it.”"
Lovely. Just lovely.
WHOA! Thar she blows. Libby knew she worked in CPD and even knew her cover name.
It’s lunch break, gang. I’ll have a fresh post up shortly to hold everyone through lunch. :)
And to whoever asked at the bottom of the previous thread-
The “specific lie” is apparently a series of them asked during Scooter’s second GJ appearence. Somebody at JOM pointed it out to me the other day, sounded like Scooter affirmatevly denied all the relevant discussions(Grossman, Grenier, Martin, Ari, etc etc)because he’d learned it from Russert.
I don’t remember exactly where the sourcing on it was from, but there was no “I don’t remembers” or “I don’t recalls”, it was much more definitive NO I didn’t talk to ____…NO, I didn’t talk to_____, NO I didn’t talk to____…
Lunch break. New thread after lunch.
Yeah, Libby learned it from Russert…
Wonder how Wells will impeach Ari…
Ah, the fresh scent of lying in the air.
SharonRB @ 22
Am I understanding this correctly? Is David Schuster’s cell phone going off in the press room? Maybe he should set it to silent with vibration. Is Nina T there today?
Christy Hardin Smith @ 33
I also like the verb used: spreading. Gives a sense of what they are doing this for – to get it out there – wide and thick. This whole admin should be jailed.
Christy -
You were talking the other day about meeting up with Libby, et al in the elevator. Do they know who you are?
Lunch!!!???
After the bombshell Ari Fl. just delivered who can eat?
Fitz can
Team Libby – alka seltzer and tums yum yum
I hEvil Parallel Universe @
19
I am eagerly awaiting James Ellroy’s treatment of this gang. Unfortunately, I think he prefers using his talents on Democratic Admins. But this is such a rich vein for him to mine, I hope he gets to it.
FUN STUFF TO DO WHILE WAITING FOR THE LUNCH RECESS TO BE OVER
or get bored between updates….
compare and contrast the two versions of the INR memos
This one, released in conjunction with New York Sun article from April 17, 2006
with this one, entered as an exhibit for the trial
Marcy (over at The Next Hurrah) pointed out one significant difference — that whoever released it to the Sun in 2006 hid the fact that the CIA got their own copies of the forged memos in October 2002….
But there is another signficant difference…
The version released to the New York Sun included a description of a March 1 assessment put together by INR entitled “Niger: Sale of Uranium to Iraq is Unlikely”. This had to be completed before Wilson had returned from Niger.
But the very next paragraph is whited out in the Sun version, but contains the fact that INR released a report on May 8 2002 that concluded “There have been provocative allegations of Iraqi nuclear activities, such as an alleged contract for provision of uranium from Niger, but we regard such information as questionable.”
******************
here is the other thing… there were obviously two different “declassification” processes that went on here. In the version leaked to the Sun, the level of classification of each paragraph is revealed. In the version used as an exhibit in the trial, that information is blacked out — despite the fact that it was released back in April 2006.
We can assume that the trial version went throught the CIA’s own declassification process under CIPA. So here is my question — was the Sun version an example of “declassification by executive fiat” (i.e. Bush/Cheney was actively involved in “declassifying” what they wanted declassified from the INR document, and hiding what they wanted to keep hidden?)
Did Schuster just call Tweety?
steve @ 36
That’s the ticket, Steve. Thanks for that.
Christy, this
means “You’re not authorized to hear this but I’m telling you anyway,” right?
Snork! Who’s gonna buy his advice on “Strategic Communications”? Exxon after the next oil spill? Union Carbide after a gas plant goes off? Bah!
Just had a coworker come by my office and ask if I was done with a project I was working on for her, I said no, just a few more minutes…or, when this trial is over.
Cannot. Tear. Myself. Away.
p.l. @43 = super stuff indeed!
SharonW @
34
Yupper. No wonder why Fitzy wanted Ari on the stand.
Scooter and Ari were swimming with the Dolphins
Rayne @ 6
in re housekeeping, could you please revisit downstairs & see what u think of my 183?
just a thot…
don’ wanna stifle discussion…
The next time you watch Fox news for fair & balanced news, and you see that LIVE BANNER waving in the top corner of the screen, read it backwards. EVIL
I’m confused (again). Was that the defense team just asking questions of Fleischer??
Re David Schuster’s cell phone: I’m surprised he can bring the cellphone into the courtroom. In the New York federal courts, they make you check the cellphones AND the crackberries at the door.
Bankruptcy court lets you bring in crackberries but no phones.
Someone should enlighten Schuster about this neat thing called “vibrate.”
drinksforall @ 54
No… its “P” for Prosecution
drinksforall @ 55
I believe it was the prosecution.
Colleen military mom @ 21
Hi Colleen. Nice to see you. ;)
Y’know, I wasn’t too bothered by the Target registry thing. At least with Tar-zhay, there’s generally something that everyone can afford. Far better than the kind of people who have Neiman Marcus lists [glances with daggers at in-law cousins] where you’re made to feel cheap if you’re not buying something that’s $100 .
Anyway, Shuster has something to report over lunch. Perhaps emptywheel can show him how to put his phone on vibrate?
ccmask @ 54
GRINNING WIDELY – thanx ccmask!
How long will it take Raw Story to post a nice
juicy headline?
I thought Wells’ cross of Martin was less than pedestrian. On balance it seemed to do more harm than good.
Generally speaking, in cross less is more.
Playing Ball
Photo of Ari arriving at court.
Bay State Librul @ 52
Nyuk nyuk nyuk.
:)
-
p.lukasiak @ 44
It would help us tell what was a “national Security” issue.. and what was a “jeez this looks bad for us” issue.
And one thing that Plameologists can probably verify: that Ari’s role has always been one of the biggest unknowns in the case, and probably not just for the observers.
I just put the burrito filling in the crock pot — easy dinner tonight — just sorry I won’t be home all afternoon to ‘refresh refresh’ …
As always, amazing liveblogging — have a refreshing lunch break :-)
I just put up a fresh thread for everyone to chew on while Marcy and Jeralyn and Pach grab some lunch in the courthouse cafeteria. Thought you guys could use something fresh. :)
Sharon and Phoenix (34 and 50) it is even better than that. He said (according to EW): “I REMEMBER HIM SAYING she works at CIA at CPD (my bold). Very interesitng.
> I thought Wells’ cross of Martin was
> less than pedestrian. On balance it
> seemed to do more harm than good
In my lay opinion, the whole process on Thursday seemed to be designed to push Ari to Monday. And this morning’s events to try to push Ari to after lunch. IMHO this was entirely designed to try to up the psychological pressure on Ari – who knows that Cheney and Gitmo are out there, somewhere, waiting… They just wanted to get Ari as nervous as possible before he spoke.
Unfortunately Walton started Ari before lunch, knocking them off game a bit.
Cranky
Question from a non-attorney – I just want to make sure I understand this “pig in a poke” thing. Does this mean that Fitz does not what Fleischer is going to say during testimony?
Cranky Observer:
I’m not sure what you mean with this, are you saying Ari is worried about getting sent to Gitmo? (Of course the whole Administration belongs there).
-ugh-oh-spaghettio’s; me thinks ari just flushed libby down the potomac…
Thank you emptywheel!
Riveting. Like the veils being lifted. Wonder what it’s like to be the Wilsons right now? Whew.
“I added the VP did not send this person, CIA sent on his own volition.”
I can’t believe he added this on his own, there must have been prior discussion.
“I believe he said Valerie Plame.”
Holy fuck.
lorelynn at 71 — It means that Fitzgerald did not know what evidence and/or conduct Fleischer had when he agreed to the conduct and use immunity in order to secure his testimony. He took a risk that Fleischer’s conduct was not chargeable, but that he knew of conduct from others which was. But Fitzgerald certainly knew what Fleischer’s testimony would be today, as Fleischer has already testified before the grand jury that indicted Libby.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 33
Yep Christy, this is not the same protocol we followed while I was employed at the NSA that is for sure!! I can’t imagine how long ago I would have landed in jail had we performed our day-to-day functions in that manner.
Swopa at 76 — hehehehe I know.
I never understood the logic of the “nepotism” insinuation by WH. For someone outside the beltway, the entire political-media-lobbist machine in D.C. seems to be one cosy gene pool. Husbands and wives, fathers and sons (41 and 43–talks about nepotism). Just look how difficult it was to find jurors with no connection to any of the parties
.
Also, isn’t it just generally understood that if you’re named Ambassador to Luxembourg, you were a big contributor; but if you’re named Ambassador to a sensitive country like Iraq, you’re a career diplomat who probably has had some dealings with CIA and other intel orgs? It’s hard to imagine there was someone more qualified than Wilson to send to Niger to investigate the yellow cake/Iraq claim.
Also, this notion that it was a junket–it’s not like they sent Wilson to the Riveria to investigate celebrities. I mean, how much fun could that trip have been?
LOL! Hi!
SharonRB @ 22
InOnTheFly at 78 — Yes, and as far as I know, the SF-312s have not been amended to say “rules do not apply to the persons in the employ of George Bush and/or Dick Cheney.” Ahem.
> I’m not sure what you mean with this, are you
> saying Ari is worried about getting sent to
> Gitmo? (Of course the whole Administration
> belongs there).
Gitmo is obviously an exaggeration (I won’t even say fantasy since as a citizen I think it abhorrent). But Cheney & Co. clearly have _some_ lever that they use on wayward Republicans. Even powerful, highly-placed congressmen have repeatedly been jerked back on their reins by _something_ the Administration uses since 2002. People inside the adminstratoin, even those in Civil Service, have been repeatdly and effectively muzzled both in office and after.
What is it they use to shut people up? I have no idea. But it is too many people over too long a period to think they don’t have something.
Cranky
Christy, did you see my question at 47?
lorelynn @ 72
No, but he didn’t know when they made the immunity deal…
Often the defense attorneys will say make the deal and we’ll tell you X Y and Z…
Fitz didn’t even get that…therefore the pig in the poke…
Nefarious Leslie — I missed your question — but, you are correct. It’s “I’m not supposed to talk about this, on penalty of having my security clearance yanked if I were a regular person, but the Bush White House doesn’t have to follow the rules, so I’m telling you anyway, and to hell with the national security consequences that ripple forward.” Jerks.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 87
Far too kind a word for them, Christy, as we both know. I hope this trial exposes all their nastiness, in full view for everyone to see.
hackworth @ 39
That’s what it sounded like from EW’s posts. She mentioned his phone going off and playing “The Victors” a couple of times. Everyone is getting pissed except for her Wolverine-self.
Unfortunately Walton started Ari before lunch, knocking them off game a bit.
Walton also made sure that the really damning stuff from Ari made it out in time for every person who is eating lunch and checking out the news will read
What is CPD please?
Patsy Stone @ 82
Okay, Pats — get back to work. LOL!!! Nice to see you here. You missed a great weekend!
What is CPD please?
The (WMD) Counter-Proliferation Division of the CIA.
It is important to remember that the CIA is divided between Operations (i.e. people involved in doing secret/covert stuff) and Analysis (people analysing information).
CPD was “Operations — “Analysis” had its own division that dealt with WMD intelligence called WINPAC.
By telling Ari that Valerie was CPD, he was telling him her work involved secret operations, not just analyzing stuff….
Maddie @ 91
Counter-Proliferation Division.
What’s “CPD”?
Maddie @ 91
I think…counter proliferations division
Thanks, I see definition.
Based on Libby’s experience on working in national security at the highest eschelons of government throughout numerous administrations, wouldn’t Libby have to have known that Plame was working in the Directorate of Operations and that the DO was where the spooks worked as opposed to the Dir of Intelligence, where the analysts worked? He knew she was in CPD…does knowing that fact mean that he knew she was in the Dir of Ops? Does knowing all this mean anything to this case?
WOW, what a great day to find this site!
p.lukasiak @ 92
What a great point, especially contrasting CPD with WINPAC. Thanks!
ManagedChaos at 98 — We had some discussion about this already via Craig Schmall, the briefer from the CIA for Libby and Cheney, and from Robert Grenier, the former Number 3 at CIA.
Robert Grenier, the former Number 3 at CIA.
but IIRC it was established in testimony Grenier wasn’t the number 3 at the CIA…. Martin thought he was, but he was just in charge of the Iraq portfolio….
dqueue @ 100
Hey, dqueue! It was great meeting you the other night at the Hawk & Dove.
Krashkopf @ 99
Assuming, of course, you had no other plans for the rest of the day. If you were thinking of doing something else, this place could easily wreck those earlier well-laid plans.
IChristy Hardin Smith @
101
So, should Libby have reasonably known at that time that CPD was secret stuff? I don’t remember what came of the CIA briefer’s testimony regarding this issue. Doesn’t this issue go to motive in that if Libby should have known CPD was secret, he would have motive to lie about what he knew and what he told others?
pluk at 102 — I thought Grenier said he was the next after McLaughlin who was the Number 2 — he was the number 3 for his portfolio on Iraq. There are a whole string of portfolios at that Number 3 level, as I understand it.
ManagedChaos at 105 — If, as Cheney’s National Scurity advisor, Libby did not know that the DO and the CPD were staffed with a lot of covert ops folks, then he should not have had the job. It would have been a fairly elementary thing to know at that level. Although, I have to say, knowing that the CIA folks like the press person for CIA were freely talking about it — even with the office of the VP — really pisses me off. That’s incredibly sloppy on all of their parts.
This is better than seeing it on TV. Keep it up FDL,emptywheel. Thank you all. I now will read all others with comments as I am a new bloger.
The first thing I latched onto from Ari’s testimony is the fact that he and Libby had never had lunch before. And during their first lunch Libby leaks classified info to the outgoing press secretary. I think the jury will come to the right conclusion….
p.lukasiak @ 44
P, I found those defense exhibits yesterday. Their import to me was that 1) they were dated June 10, to Grossman 2) It had all the information in there about the trip and how the VP and Rummy were told of the results of the trip and for them to continue to say that they didn’t know about the trip is a lie and one that they peddled and peddled.
Even as of today, they are peddling this s**t!
We had given a much broader quote. We had no knowledge of anybody being sent to Niger because we asked a question.
Also, they were told: Via defense exhibit 421
This is from Craig Schmall’s e-mail after his first being questioned by the FBI.
I’m going to get epu’d again, I just know it.
Cant help it…been lurking…riveted…how about Cathie Martins testimony re the NIE…and that she had nowhere to go because it was the OVP telling her to report it….quite a dilemna…
thanks for blogging this…extremely important and for once, satisfying…thank you so very much…
re: Ari ’s registering with Target, you’ll note he didn’t get all the Tennis Balls he wanted.
Angel @ 108
During their first lunch, at Libby’s request. He was definitely out in front of this story… just as he demanded time from Grenier while Grenier was in a meeting with DCI. It’s going to be interesting to see if he behaved similarly with others…
SharonRB @ 102
SharonRB, likewise! I am so glad I caught your post about the event (and it was a thrill to meet Marcy!). We had a wonderful time that night. What a great bunch of people!
Can’t recall…did CPD get fully defined for jurors in previous testimony or opening statements?
Wish p.lukasiak could simply pass the jurors his explainer…
Saint Brigid @ 81
my take: OVP and CIA weren’t on the same page concerning iraq and wmd. OVP thought CIA was looking to undermine their wmd reasons for war. Joe Wilson’s Niger report shot down of one of OVP’s main reasons for going to war with Iraq.
learning that Joe Wilson was married to a CIA officer could have appeared to OVP as a case of CIA sending ‘one of their own’ to Niger to boost their case that no yellowcake went to Iraq.
i think OVP felt calling nepotism [Wilson was doing the CIA’s bidding] was the way they chose to discredit Joe Wilson’s findings and the CIA’s analysis of Iraq/wmd… and preserve their case for war.
just my thoughts.
Now, if in fact between the collective testimony of Ms Martin and Ari [my ass is exposed and therefore so is Libby’s] Fleischer, we have evidence of knowing something in advance of saying one learned from Tim Russert well after the fact, would Fitz just keep bringing on the evidence to unequivocally nail the little bugger Libby?
e.g. why would the trial have to continue more than the defense now trying to attempt to undermine the testimony of Ms Martin and Mr Fleischer.. seems clear to me …
Rayne @ 114
probably not…and its highly likely that the distinction will not be made to the jury (directly at least) because Walton ruled that the issue of whether Valerie was covert is not material to the trial —
that being said, Fitz is probably going to try and back-door that information in — and will be able to do so thanks to Wells mentioning Ari’s immunity deal during opening arguments.
isis2 @ 115
Thanks. I still don’t think the nepotism charge is going to play with non-DC types. I guess they can’t say one of the CIA’s own, because it sort of calls the authenticity of whole shebang (the WH/DC puppet show) into question. Who’s side are you on, really, Mr. Cheney?
I think I remember VP calling it a “junket” on MTP or some other show. Funny-they got hoisted on their own petard with the repulsives in Congress getting nailed for golf junkets to Scotland paid for by Ambramoff.
p.lukasiak (117) — but Plame’s covert status could well be the reason that Ari sought immunity, yes? And leaking her status was a punishable offense, providing motive for Libby to lie?
Boy, I don’t know how that’s not material after hearing/reading Ari’s initial testimony.
I’m with you, I think Fitz is going to have try and make this point, backdoor or no.
6 Miles – Yes, the proseuction will keep pouring it on. The standard is “beyong a reasonable doubt,” and they will present anything and everything they can to reach that, even if it seems like gilding the lily.
Lunch is over and Ari is back on the stand. Emptywheel has resumed liveblogging on a new thread.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 107
I wonder what CIA undercover staff following this trial think about these revelations as to how freely information is bandied about by WH flacks.
FDL reporting is genius.
thank you.
Saint Brigid,
The nepotism charge has to be seen as a lashing out from a grandiose, deeply misogynistic, furious VP who has basically promised Iraq on a silver platter to Big Oil (Energy conference of 2001).
You’re right. It’s not rational. Translated into Cheney-ese it probably goes something like this: “That candy ass Wilson was sent by his so-called “spy” wife on a fool’s errand just to discredit Me, the Ruler of the Universe! How DAAAAARE they!” or something like that.
I think the “nepotism” excuse is just that — an excuse. They were punishing Wilson for pointing out the admin’s lies by trashing his wife’s covert operation & endangering her life (and who knows how many others) — and showing everyone else in town what happens to people who try to stop them from doing what they want. It was a message to insiders. For the rest of the world, they said “nepotism.”
That’s my guess.
as i have no legal expertise, i’ll just be lurking here to find how hopefully this will add fuel to the fire for impeachment proceedings to begin or am i not getting the deal here? can this trial possibly be the catalyst for such? ohhhhhhhhhh i sooooooo wish!!
I am older and new at this computer and internet stuff, so I hope I am doing this right. Just want to say thank you for being at this trail to represent us forgotten average Americans who crave the truth from our elected officials.
Lori
djinn and strawhat:
Yeah I think you guys are right–I can see how placing bleeding horse heads inside 1000 tct sheets in beds all over town would have been a logistic nightmare!
VP = Valerie Plame
VP = Vice President
Confusing. (Frankly, I’m confused by this whole trial….!)
Why isn’t this trial on CourtTV? Was it requested and turned down by the judge?
Dem-agog at 130 — Federal courtrooms do not allow cameras, so the trial could not be televised. Frankly, I like it better that way — less showboating for the teevee, although it would be great to be able to watch this live, I’ll grant you that — but from a legal practice standpoint, I think we are all much better off leaving the cameras out of the court.
Pig To The Pokey!
Pig To The Pokey
Christy Hardin Smith @ 33
And just what sort of classified information would a Press Secretary be authorized to hear? Is a Press Sec’ty on a “need-to-know” basis for any classified material.
Does Ari have a Security Clearance???
djinn @ 124
Exuuuse me….Nepotism?
Just who did the President Appoint to be his Special Asst. on the Bush-Cheney Re-Election Committee??? [Hint youngest “soon to be a mommy” daughter of VP Cheney]
And who was appointed the State Departments Ass’t. Secretary for Iraq Reconstruction??? Who is this (daughter of VP Cheney) married to???
And just who was sitting for years on the program Counterpoint and the head of several Conservative “Morals” based organizations??? Who just played attack dog against Hilary Clinton???
****
Didn’t we just have Libby’s Special Secretary on the stand…just who is her husband???
Does being the wife of FCC Director Martin make one a Martinette? ;-)