
It's freezing cold here this morning and, while I was in DC covering the Libby trial, my birdfeeders emptied as the birds sought some food and refuge during the spate of winter storms that we have been having. Not a lot of accumulation overall at this point, but enough that there has been a fine sheen of ice on the roads most days and still cold enough that all of the feathers are fluffed out on the visitors this morning. I just had time to refill the feeders a few minutes ago, and already the ravenous horde of song sparrows and house finches has descended, with the polite little Carolina wren hopping to and fro on the hood of my car, waiting his turn.
It is good to be home.
As much as the hustle and bustle of the trial, the incredible spectacle of media and political intersection, the riveting testimony, the palpably growing feeling of anticipation in that courtroom for even more testimony to come, there really is no substitute for coming back to your own nest. But wow, what a week in DC for me.
On day one of the opening statements, I rode up in the elevator that morning with Wells, Jeffress, Scooter and Mrs. Libby. Libby was very courtly, holding the elevator door open so that I could get in without being smacked by a door, saying "Please, you go first." while smiling with his mouth and trying to pull back a bit of the worry in his eyes. I have seen a lot of people on trial over the years, and they are always trying to smile and hide the worry on the advice of counsel. So much of courtroom drama is just that...drama.
Mrs. Libby is quite lovely, dark hair, always wearing a beautiful scarf, trying to stay calm under all of that pressure. Once on the elevator, I got into a conversation with Jeffress about the "math geek" conversations that he, Wells and Fitz had been having with Judge Walton regarding the procedure for jury selection strikes on Monday. Perhaps you have to be a lawyer or a math person to get the hilarity of the discussion on this sort of minutiae, but we had a good laugh about it nonetheless. Jeffress is the sort of trial attorney who is detail oriented and meticulous in his presentations, but who can laugh about the absurdity of the law around the edges -- the kind of person with whom I likely would have been chummy had this been my local courthouse on a day to day basis, and it was odd realizing that having covered his representation of Libby for so long. Wells has a much more flamboyant style, he's much more old school trial attorney, and that was never my cup of legal tea -- the sort of person who would have been a colleague for me, but not exactly a pal, you know?
Libby spent the rest of the day looking over at me on the press bench and smiling a little, perhaps thinking he'd found a kindred math spirit or something. (Barbara Comstock disabused him of that when she realized who he was looking at...somehow, I don't think I'm her favorite for some reason. Ahem.)
Later that day, Patrick Fitzgerald held the door open for me to re-enter the courtroom after a break. He was a little fumbly with the "no please, you go ahead" in that way that men have when they are either shy or thinking about other things but trying to remember their manners. He is very tall and much more soft spoken in person that I anticipated -- must be that Jesuit training -- but when he gets annoyed with defense counsel tactics, watch out. That male pattern bald spot of his creeps into a bright pink, as the anger moves up from his neck, and his voice roars out in disgusted indignation. Fitz gets his Irish up very calmly, very matter of factly, and much in the way that you would never want to be the recipient of it, I can tell you that.
The media folks are a mix of personalities and knowledge about the case and the law. I really enjoyed getting to know a number of them -- and enjoyed talking about the case, and haggling the facts and pointing a few of them to some great resources (like eRiposte for the Niger documents). I have to say, in all honesty, that getting to meet Nina Totenberg was an honor and a thrill for me -- I have loved her Supreme Court summaries at the end of each term for as long as I can remember, and the humor that she injects into each one along with the legal analysis was one of the reasons that the practice of law called to me. Unfortunately, I didn't get a chance to thank her for that while she was there because we were all so caught up in trial details every day, but thank you, Nina.
I am so grateful to Judge Walton and his wonderful staff who granted us the press passes. Judge Walton's actions with the jury are designed to empower them, to bring them into the heart of the legal process -- they are told they are "judges of the facts," they are allowed to ask questions of the witnesses (by writing the question out on a 3x5 card, and then the judge and attorneys haggle over what is or is not relevant, and then the witness is asked any appropriate question); and by allowing each juror to take notes througout the trial in notebooks that they may then use to refresh their own memories during deliberations. This is wonderful, and has led to a very active, very involved and attentive jury -- which, considering the detail in this case, is a very good thing for all sides.
Most of all, though, I am so grateful to all of you for helping us to fund this venture and for giving us so much support for covering this case along the way. Being able to describe all of this in as much detail as we can for you is a pleasure -- it is always more fun to have someone to share this sort of conversation with, and we honestly could not ask for a better bunch of folks in our comments and reading the blog and sending feedback via e-mail. All through the week last week, when I would get tired or feel mentally drained, I'd remind myself that you all were depending on us to get this coverage right and to do it thoroughly, and that would spur me forward with more detail and a renewed sense of purpose, and I thank you for that because it pushed me to do an even better job than I otherwise might have done.
Sitting here this morning in the calm of my kitchen, looking back on the whirlwind of the week last week...well, it seems a bit surreal, to be perfectly honest. In a good way, mind you.
But today, I'm going to spend hanging out with The Peanut and Mr. ReddHedd, mulling over some of the bits and pieces in the back of my mind for a post later in the weekend, but mainly relaxing and helping The Peanut ease back into her regular routine. I've been missed by my girl, and she's been missed right back. Am hoping to get some time this weekend to peek at the seed catalogs that arrived while I was gone -- the beautiful flowers on the covers beckon to me with all the frozen landscape outside.
But I cannot help but think about the lawyers on both sides of this trial -- they'll get no relaxation this weekend. I'm certain that motions and response briefs are flying fast and furious between the two. We already know that a subpoena went out for Karl Rove and Dan Bartlett from Team Libby (according to Isikoff in Newsweek), and with Cathie Martin still on the stand and Ari Fleischer on deck...it's only going to get more complicated in terms of the twists and malignant turns within the Bush Administration and Vice President Cheney's office as we go forward.
Part of my mind is still whirring back in DC this morning, but another part is breathing a sigh of relief to be out of the maelstrom and back home. I'm going to pour myself another cuppa coffee. You do the same, and pull up a chair...
PS -- Bob Geiger has some hilarious cartoons this morning. hehehe
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
mornin’ all
ROOTZ!
Is it too early for a Martini? Morning Firedogs!
Christy - any read of the jury - body language, scowls, rolling of eyes, evidence of dislike of any witnesses or lawyers, etc?
Welcome home, Christy. I’m enjoying the behind the scenes color commentary about elevators, scarves and whatnot as much as the trenchant legal analysis. You guys are doing great work!
TEAM FDL ROCKS !!!!
There’s no place like home. Missed you guys for a while, phone problem and I have dial up.
Looks like Fredo is on his “I took a shit on the coffee table, what’s your plan to clean it up?” rant this morning.
Hi Christy,
One thing that we can all count on is the unvarnished truth coming out of FDL’s coverage.
You all have earned that kind of trust. Thanks for that.
I hope reconnecting with the Peanut and Mr. Redd is all that and more. Ya’ll enjoy it.
Anyone seen Vegas odds on conviction vs. acquittal?
Oops. Heh. Drat you, Christy. Now I have to amend the draft I was working on for tomorrow. You have some of the same stuff in this one.
Good morning! Christy, I love the commentary you’re doing on the personalities involved in the trial.
Do you have any theories on why the Defense has called Rove and Bartlett? I can see that they’d be very useful indeed if Scooter was charged with the leak, but how do they help with the perjury and obstruction?
To me, it’s starting to look like Team Libby is working for Fitz, helping him get a lot of information on the public record that goes toward the case against Cheney and Rove for leaking the nature of Mrs. Wilson’s employment.
Hi, Christy — love the word pictures you paint for us! From the courtroom and from your kitchen. We’ve scant snow here, too. Worrisome for the cabin plumbing, but those flower catalogs remind that spring’s not far ahead.
A couple small typos “onestly” should be “honestly” in the you paragraph. And further down, “Vie” President should be “Vice”–well, actually, should be “indicted, disgraced, former Vice” President. But that’s just one opinion….
And speaking of NBC shills the WH can count on, this morning on MSNBC Alex Witt was trying to get her military guest to echo the WH spin that the resolutions are encouraging the enemy and disheartening the troops. You’d think NBC wouldn’t want to be so obvious in their steno-spin.
I want to thank you all at FDL for staying with this Libby case, and explaining things so well. Mass media heads said prior to the start of this trial that nobody would remember or care. Seems like they were wrong about that one.
Pach at 10 — No, please don’t amend. I’d love to hear your take. This all sort of came out in a spew this morning, so it was just stream of consciousness. I’d really love to hear what you thought on everyone and all of this — your eye on detail with personalities in terms of the psych perspective is a very valuable one for me, so please don’t change it around.
Thanks for the insight Christy. I hope Jane is getting some needed rest and recovery. It is good to have you both back.
I would have pegged Comstock for many things but not for being anti-mathite.
Beautiful picture. Japanese gardens are always my favorites. I miss the one in Portland, OR.
Christy,
You probably cannot imagine all of us glued to our laptops or desktops unable to move, unable to work, unable to concentrate on anything else while you and Marcy are feeding our newly found addiction.
The rest of the press is just waking up to what we’ve known all along was going to pop the cork of this putrid administration. Once the genie starts oozing out of the bottle, they won’t be able to put it back in.
The MSM is about to be forced to make some really big decisions, will they accept that they were patsys all along, eating the cocktail weenies, basking in their access while being played like a cheap violin? Will they hold their noses and continue the fetid practice to keep their precious access? OR, Will they start doing their damned jobs?
They are lucky to have you and Team FDL to lead the way. Maybe we all will be lucky if they realize it and learn something.
You see that thing JMM quoted about Fleischer freaking over the WP article’s mentioning that the leaker might get the death penalty? Wow. I think that is the same article as the 1×2x6 article.
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.c.....012145.php
RevDeb at 16 — Marcy has been amazing, start to finish each day. She’s an iron woman in terms of transcribing everything — and I have something like 60 plus pages of handwritten notes from the courtroom and trial coverage to go back through and pull out bits and pieces for you guys. Pach started us off with a bang durning jury selection and we haven’t looked back…
Ahhh…Our VP Mr. Cheney, he’s one in a million, isn’t he?? What a genuinely nice guy. Not sure if you’ve seen seen this Daily Show ‘interview’ or not, but it’s pretty hilarious stuff:
http://minor-ripper.blogspot.c.....ywolf.html
Anyway if Fleischer has immunity (or even if not, since we’re talking about Fleischer), doesn’t that mean he’ll lie through his teeth?
Christy Hardin Smith @ 18
Amazing, just amazing.
I hope some $$ is coming in to help both the “project” and the site upkeep. You all have MORE THAN EARNED IT.
jayt at 4 — I’d rather not get into any specifics about the individual jurors, if you don’t mind. It’s probably trial lawyer caution, but once the jurors are seated and a jury is sworn, I never like to do anything that could tinker with any individual hearing the case — no ammo for either team of attorneys to argue for juror replacement or anything. I’ve been through that in court and it’s never pretty, and I don’t want to be someone who contributes to that in any way.
I will say that the entire jury seems very attentive and listens carefully to the witnesses, which bodes well for this type of trial.
Welcome home and have a happy weekend with your indoor and outdoor family members!
We lived in a rental house for a few years and had a bird feeder that attached to the outside of our ground-floor window with suction cups. One family of chickadees trained several years’ worth of babies how to land on our windowsill and fly from there to the feeder perch. I used to stand right next to them on my side of the glass and watch, entranced, as they figured it out. It more than made up for the parents “dee dee dee”-ing at dawn outside the upstairs window, telling us to bring more seeds stat. :-)
Jerelyn thinks it will only hurt Irving if Rover testifies.
Is anyone attending any anti-war rallies today? I’m going to head to downtown DC in a little while.
Christy,
I’ve wondered if The Peanut was a boy or a girl. I have girls (now 18 and 20), and know what a joy they are. Just enjoy her; in no time she’ll be a big girl! Thanks again for your hard work.
Thanks for all the great coverage Chirsty. Your perspective on the legal details and personalities has been priceless.
F.Y.I. to the readers this morning, “priceless” costs money. Ask not what FDL can do for you, ask what you can do for FDL…
anti-war rally in DC footage on CNN now… they said they “will have a lot more coverage ahead”
none at 20 — No, not at all. If I had to guess, I’d say it was a very limited grant of immnity to Fleischer in terms of it applying to a very specific set of facts and circumstances and that is it. An immunity deal is never a blanket set of immunity for any crime committed ever — and it never, ever allows the person testifying to commit perjury or lie to investigators with impunity. If Fleischer lies on the stand, you can expect an indictment to be forthcoming almost immediately — I’d bank on that.
Christy,
Our bird feeders are and have always been raided more by the squirrels than by the birds. We finally found an inexpensive spring-loaded one that the squirrels can’t get into. They still get more than enough out of the others though.
Here, mostly Cardinals, Bluejays, Juncos, Nuthatches, Tufted Titmice, and a few Downey woodpeckers. Morining Doves on the ground cleaning up after them all.
It is now almost Feb. and we have yet to have measurable snow in the Boston area. Not. Good.
for donations going to the FDL Real World DC, the donation should end in .07 right?
Christy: the traffic on this place has obviously been heavy during the trial. Do you get the feeling that your coverage might one day be looked at as, well, historically significant, momentous? Sam Ervin would, I think, be pleased. This is more riveting than Watergate. And the stakes are certainly higher.
Pach — I think Marcy was going today as well.
Karl Rove has been subpoenaed in Libby Trial. MSNBC
O Happy Day!
This trial is getting better and better. Rove and Bartlett? I’m betting there will be a lot more. I don’t know if it is admissable or not, but the administration saying nobody did anything and now we find the behind the scenes happenings display the opposite. It certainly proves they are liars. Not just Libby. They were all trying to cover their asses. If any of that is cordinated, wouldn’t that be a conspiracy? (No I am not a conspiracy theorist. It’s a question) If Matalin has to appear, I will be grateful it is not on TV. She and Van Sustern must have the same plastic surgeon. He must only know how to make one face.
Kentucky Woman @ 35
well, he’ll be prepped for sure, they know the answers he’s gonna give and they plan on some kind of shiny object to take everyone’s eye off the ball
let’s hope the jury doesn’t fall for it
Kentucky Woman @ 35
MSNBC Breaking News: Day late….
Guess that means their coverage of the anti-war rally in DC will air manana….
retirin at 34 — One of the things that has been most interesting is to see the shifting perspectives of the media about this blog in particular as we’ve been at the courthouse. A number of the reporters told me they had already been reading here — for the legal analysis and the media dissection that Jane and I have been doing on this case…well, since this blog got started, really. But a lot more of them had not, and they had no concept of why we were really there or how we would be acting in terms of coverage, because they had no context for us. Pach started things off on a very professional footing from the get go the first week, and we have now evolved into a sort of “one of the media crew” feeling with them, mainly because of the depth of knowledge that all of us had about varying aspects of the case. They realized, I think, that this isn’t some sort of play acting at being reporters, but that we have a genuine interest in the details and the analysis on this, and that we do it as well as we can.
So there is a grudging level of respect, for the most part. And the most amusing thing was that by the end of the week, I became a sort of legal resource for a lot of folks in terms of what the motions were and the bench arguments were about and the implications of various rulings over the long term court process, etc. — and it was pissing Barbara Comstock off royally as she sat in the bench in front of me every day that people were asking me in stead of her (at least, that’s how it seemed, because I wasn’t spinning them, I was just teling them the law flat out and leaving them to consider whatever political implications there might be on their own).
Prairie Sunshine @ 37
they’re talking about the anti war march that happened before we went into Iraq…it’s a few years late
Morning Christy,
Thanks again for everything.
This combined coverage has just been amazing. You are setting a very high bar for the rest of the journalists you met last week. I’m sure they’re taking notice.
Morning, Christy *hugs* - question - did you introduce yourself in the elevator with the Libby team? Or spare their nerves?
Prairie Sunshine @ 36
I was surprised by the timing of this “dump” myself….
Christy @ 38
Well you’ve certainly made it impossible for me to get any work done. Wife and I will be sending additional love via email (don’t trust money on the tubes). Great job by all! Go Fitz! Go Jane!
Christy Hardin Smith @ 40
How good does that feel?
Hi Babs! Hope you’re enjoying the reading here. LOTS more to come.
Hi everybody - heading to the protest shortly
Sharkbabe @ 47
Give a shout out for me. Wish I could be there too.
Go represent, Sharkbabe, and stay warm. check in so we know you weren/t disappeared.
Kathryn at 41 — I had my press badge on at all times, so they knew I had a media pass. But I didn’t introduce myself, mainly because it was the day of openings and I figured Wells had enough on his mind and I didn’t want to inject that into the mix. When Jeffress and I were talking, we did so quietly. I know how it is for attorneys on the day of opening - you are running through all the permutations in your mind of your case, your theme, your planned remarks — and it didn’t seem appropriate to jiggle that in any way and insert myself into the process — I would not have wanted someone to do that to me, so I didn’t do that to them.
Interviewing a guy about Bush 41’s wiping little sonny’s nose and saying “bad media. bad. bad.” this morning on MSNBC, Alex Witt said in the interest of full disclosure she needed to point out that the man had been a Democratic legislator.
The guy said yeah, 20 years ago. So I guess this means O’Beirne will hereafter always be introduced as the wife of the man who did the hiring in Iraq and picked the wingnut kids over the expertise?
And Witt…will she preface every question with, “as a biased shill for the Bush WH second only to Michele Bachmann, I’m wondering….”?
Oh, the guy talking about Poppy’s still covering for little shrub? He said Bush brought it on itself and it’s embarrassing that a mature man who’s president of the US has to have his daddy fight his battles for him.
retirin’ in five @ 43
Should read “snailmail.”
Thanks, Christy - need these details!!
Sharkbabe @ 46
Shake it up good, Sharkbabe!
RevDeb said (and I agree and hope):
I want to thank the commenter yesterday (Ed*ard maybe) who provided the link to the videoclip of Marcy and Bryan York on C-Span. It is unfortunate that Mr. York is so rude and/or unwilling or incapable of shutting up and letting the much more informed and intelligent Marcy speak without talking over her. I guess he is just an example of the much used technique of the less you have to say (in terms of facts etc.) the more and louder you talk.
Magnificient Job FDL!
Christy Hardin Smith @ 35
Cool. I just talked to her. We’ll meet downtown.
Oh, and words fail me at the incredibleness of team FDL this week. We’re truly witnessing the dawn of a new age.
I am delighted that the media grew to consider the FDLers the experts. That’s why we needed you there, not just in your homes attached to the pdf files and the media accounts. You need to help these guys learn to do their jobs.
So awful that they are getting paid well, and all you get is adulation form the likes of us…
Sharkbabe at 55 — Thanks much. You guys are making me blush this morning. *g*
any idea as to who’s speaking today in D.C.? (other than Kucininch?)
It is a shame, but I know I would rather have the respect of the FDL family than all the phoney, in reality worthless, US Dollars in the world! But then I’m not your normal materialistic consumer.
Thanks Christy,
As the events unfold, it looks to me that
the “concerted effort” by the Bush Adm to push
back Wilson, may become a “conspiracy”
At what point, does push back turn into a
conspiracy, with unindicted co-conspirators?
Jack
gosh, hope my employer doesn’t monitor my internet usage at work - I would be so busted for having FDL up all day last week. Many thanks for all of you providing this fascinating coverage and hope that the pawltry amount I sent in for you guys helped in some way.
And now for a completely “teenage moment” - (I’m actually 42), tell David Schuster and Patrick Fitzgerald that I said “hey.” LOL LOL :)
All the best from The Woodlands, Texas.
The personal details of the cast of characters in the trial remind me of discussions in college English classes as to whether readers should delve into biographies of the authors. I am in favor of knowing, just as I enjoy the descriptions here of demeanor, clothes, tics, and tone of these people who have had so much to do with where our country is today.
CNN says live report on anti-surge rally coming up… looks like crystal clear skies in DC today.
Alison at 56 — You know, a lot of the media folks are very knowledgeable about the case and want to give it thorough coverage, but they are constrained by page space in the newspaper or time space constraints on tv, or editorial cuts inthe the stories they want to file, and legal departments pulling them back from saying certain things, etc., etc. The way things are currently done in teh corporate structure of the media really hogties the reporters in a lot of ways. (Of course, sometimes that can be good, if you have a reporter like, say, Judy Miller, who is running amok with articles that NEED to be fact checked…but that’s a whole other discussion on its own.) It’s a complicated problem, the way the current media culture is set up — and one that the folks at Neiman and folks like Jay Rosen have talked about a lot. SOmethg that I hope to do more on once we get past trial coverage, actually, because it needs a lot more discussion.
Give em hell, Sharky.
CNN live in DC now
Oh, that’s worth so much more than you know.
Morning Everyone! Its freezing out (brrrrr). Christy you write (and think) fabulously. Your insights today also are amazing. I really hope you are planning to put this all into a book. It is wonderful.
I have been away from fdl too much the last few days (in addition to work, we just had a sweet 16 b’day party for our daughter - 45 kids plus or minus (boys and girls). Lots of prep, nervous. It was great but I am beat.
I have a fresh brewed pot behind me (half real/ half decaf - that way I get twice the number of cups before getting jittery).
the brew is Columbian if anyone would like some.
Lou Costello @
66
They will also be covering the counter-demonstrations…
Bay State Librul @ 62
Personally, I’d like to see a lot of INDICTED co-conspirators.
Jeebus. CNN anchorette (whoever she is) just posed a burning question to the audience re: the protest today. The logical question might be: Do you support the troop surge/escalation/enhancement?
But NOOOOOOOO. Her question: Do you think criticism of the war is –
Didn’t hear the rest because Mr. Marks flipped the channel, but it was obvious where she was headed.
twolf1 @ 69
I think the counter demonstrators can actually serve if they believed in their own point
Christy, no offense, but I am just so happy for Jane that I find it difficult to focus on how Libby is slow-roasting.
Morning pups,
I am so fascinated by the possibility that this trial could bring down this administration but know so little about the law I would like to ask a couple of questions…please forgive my ignorance…
If Rove is found to have lied to the grand jury or that he has commited any illegal act could any action against Rove be taken by this court or would a new trial be necessary?
I have read that many believe Fitz ultimately has his eye on Cheney.How wide is the scope of this trial and what discovery would create the worst case scenario for Cheney and what action could this court then take?
Thanks
Evidently MSNBC still thinks it is a blockbuster that Rove was subpoenaed yesterday.
Last night on “Hardball”, David Schuster said that the jury were able to write questions to be asked in trial. This is paraphrasing now, Schuster said that one of the “questions” questioned the ethics of one of Libby’s attorneys. Wonder which one?
This guy rivals Tai Shan (baby panda) for adorableness.
O.T. Molly Ivins is not doing well. Send prayers.
Hello from cloudy LA. What an amazing week this was.
Hi friends. How is everyone this fine morning?
RevDeb @ 70
Me, too, but the words unindicted co-conspirators just flies off the tongue and
sounds so wonderful.
Millineryman @ 80
And that was only the appetizer. Main course and dessert yet to come.
Wonderful post, Christy, and thanks for the pic. It’s perfect. We’re so glad you’re covering the trial, but it’s also great to see you back home with family. Have a nice weekend.
The trial coverage here has been simply amazing. So much of the detail and courtroom strategy would never have reached us without you all. Thanks. Thanks.
retirin’ in five @
32
Oooooooh I do! fwiw. There’s NEVER been anything even close, has there? And the MSM are beginning to buzz about it on a regular basis. And they try to copy the idea, with mixed, and sometimes hilariously stoopid-looking results, heh.
I look for FDL, & good blogs in general, to be held in much higher regard in the future. ;->
FDL is a LEADER!! Yeehaw guys. Congrats!
this is what I wait for. Redd’s take on the people, the atmosphere, the little winks and “tells.” My teenage son who loves poker loves that part the best. Marcy’s live blogging was/is amazing, but this is the stuff I wait for with bated breath.
Brilliant piece by Dowd in NYT on Cheney: http://select.nytimes.com/gst/.....Q2BQ7DQ2AA)4w4AwQ2AQ2BQ7DQ25AuQ25bgiGm
Also an amazing article by Gary Wills in the NYT on how the position of Commander-in-Chief in its current shape is largely an invention of Bush (and Reagon). Brilliant, and scary!!!
oops! manners! Morning Christy, Pach, everyone.
How ya doin’?
retirin’ in five @
32
I sat thru every minute of the televised Ervin hearings. I’m certain he would approve and encourage FDL’s groundbreaking work here.
I’m so grateful to be one of the pups (albeit mostly a lurker) who is now able to see this trial through your educated and articulate minds.
And, to the bought-and-paid-for Corporate Media: Read and Quake. We are watching, we will know the truth, and we are legion.
(((Jane)))
(((Molly)))
Witney @ 61
Me too, LOL!!!
RevDeb @ 81
Roast Chenney on a Stick perhaps?
Christy - or others. Is there any sense about what Wells hopes to get from Rove. How can Rove’s statements help at all to support Libby on the issues he is charged with? Or, is this only a ploy, and if so what sort?
6F in Boston this morning. Brrrrrrrrr… Come on in the water is fffRoZeN
RH @ 14 - this was a “spew?” man, what you could do if you had time, eh? and by all means, Pach and Marcy, do your thing, too. the more the merrier. we can’t get enough!
Coverage is soooooo…good.
Thanks abunch.
Have had some ‘cognitive dissonance’ trying to align CHS as ‘an ol’ country lawyer’ as Sam Ervin wryly self-deprecated.
The Venn diagrams would have a fair amount of legal crossover, I’d expect.
——-
OT -
Still streaming CSPAN astronauts’ Apollo 1 memorial waiting for DC coverage [GO!, Sharkbabe!]…I’ll just say that I loved my own father, I’d have to put Walter Cunningham on the alternate list.
A gem.
Christie, everyone knows you and Marcie and Pachacutec are putting our regular pack of news mutts to shame.
I’d like to acknowledge Hardin’s role in all this, giving you passes, involving the jury, and actually listening to what’s going on. Imagine if we’d had someone like Ito up there! So if the “analytical minded” jurors were dismissed, through Hardin we have the best of this not-so-best-of-all-possible worlds.
I get the feeling that Fleischer testimony is going to be the proverbial bomb in a china shop, so everybody hold on to your hats. It has been an amazing week for FDL, but I think that this is just the beginning.
Crystal clear and 34 degress according to my window thermometer here in Portland. the sun just this minute appeared over the horizon. It’s going to be a beautiful day.
Still just shaking my head at how brilliant Fitzgerald is revealing himself to be. The entire strategy, from taking early steps to avoid greymail to avoiding a titanic media storm by not going straight for the big fish, all the while driving a stake right to the heart of the matter, boggles my mind. I wish great things for Patrick Fitzgerald.
Have had ‘cognitive dissonance’ trying to alingn CHS as ‘an ol’ country lawyer’
Aint W VA about as country as it gets, Christy?
Thank you Christy…always gracious and smart with your commentary. The up close and personal assessments are so observant and fair; would that our MSM would do the same.
I happened to stumble across the following words of wisdom from Mark Twain and thought how unnecessary this whole mess of a trial would have been if the cast of characters had followed his sage advice….
That would be because you totally dissed her fashionista bonafides!
Beware a woman whose metallic leather skirt has been criticized…
On our moronic cultural priorities. I posted this Tuesday on my own blog:
neil @ 92
Ugh — I just escaped that, but have to fly back to Boston tomorrow. What’s the forecast?
Am I wrong, or is Cheney and his crew at open war with the rest of the White House?
Is Cheney really going to get on the stand and say the White House tried to throw Libby under the bus in order to save Karl Rove?
Didn’t Kathlie Martin, who still works in the White House (although not for Cheney, anymore), basically just accuse Libby and Cheney of being unethical thugs who don’t care about classified information?
Speculation: Cheney made a big big push last fall to get Libby a pardon. Went all out behind the scenes.
But Rove advised Bush not to do so, because it would hurt him politically.
So now Cheney has no problem with Wells strategy to throw Rove under the bus, and will embrace it with gusto.
Cheney had to decide to whom he had loyalty — Bush or Libby. And perhaps he’s chosen Libby.
This is a bit of speculation, but we’ll see how it plays out.