Now up, Cathie Martin.
Cathie will testify to several things. First, she was involved in some of the early discussions of a response to Wilson. She learned of Plame's identity from Harlow and passed that on to Libby. And she was removed from responding to press inquiries and Libby took over. There's the whole strange conversation on Air Force Two. Finally, there's more stuff from later in the early days of the investigation.
It should be interesting.
Martin: went to UT, then went to Harvard Law, graduated in 93. Worked for Federal judge for a year.Went to a law firm then practiced for 6 years. My hubbie and I moved to Austin, telecommuted for a little while and changed jobs, went to work for State AG for TX, John Cornyn.
Martin: I was Cornyn's policy director, went to work for Commerce as WH liaison and Deputy COS for commcerce secretary.
Martin about 5.5 months I was recruited to work for OVP under Mary Matalin. Mary Matalin's deputy.
Martin Started at OVP in June 2001, believe I stayed until winter of 2004 (Februaryish).
Martin worked at Commerce January 2001 to June 2001.
M Matalin left December 2002. I took over beginning of 2003.
M as Assistant to VP for Public Affairs.
M Moved to President's office, working in econ policy. Feb-March 2004. Currently employed at WH as Deputy Director of Comm for policy and planning.
Fitz How much contact did you have with Libby
M Almost daily in senior staff meeting when I took over as Asst to VP for PA. Before that I saw him probably less. I also participated in meetings regularly scheduled meetings president had. Scooter was usually in those meetings. I'd have my own scheduled meetings. I had the political portfolio as well as press portfolio.
Fitz Who else worked under you?
M Press Secty; Jennifer Millerwise. 2 Press Assts, Hannah Siemers and Emily Laurimore and Jessica Iman. An Asst to me, A Deputy, does more of the political travel (she named I didn't get0.
Fit if someone wanted to speak to OVP.
M If you get calls, try to funnel through press office.
Fitz On the record, off the record, background.
M On–reporter can quote you by name. Background: Use quotes, but not refer to by name, refer to as SAO, wouldn't identify you specifically. Deep background, allowed reporter to use the info without sourcing it. They could just say for sure the car was read.
Fitz On the record: The car was red, Cathie Martin says. Background: SAO says car was red. Deep: The car was read.
M Off the record it could shape their thinking. If the car was green and I said it was read, they might not publish it.
M Scooter's practice talk off the record, they'd have to come back and clear quotes.
Fitz your notetaking?
M I tended to have 3-4 pads of paper. I didn't use one note pad for everything that I wrote down that day. If there was another topic, I would draw a line. I was constantly looking for paper. Muliple pads on my desk, wrote it down where I could find one.
Fitz Where the notes are not dated, you can't tell by comparing different pads.
M Yes
F Did Libby have pratice of using email.
M The practice was if you had to email to him you emailed to Jenny Mayfield, so she could print it out for him. You got a much faster response.
M Kristof column brought to my attention.
F introduces Kristof's column.
11:34
M describes Kristof's column.
F introduces but not for truth.
F Could you describe what your reaction was. [displayed it on the screen] Blow up second half of page.
F reads the "wholesale deceit" article Is it fair to say it was viewed as a negative article.
M It's fair to say it WOULD be viewed as such, but I don't know that it was
F How much attention paid to this
M Not that much
F now looks at Wilson paragraphs, highlighted in yellow
F was this reported at all before it was cited by Kristof
F Did there come a time when you learned who the former ambassador was?
M learned it to be Joe Wilson from Bill Harlow. He's their equivalent of Public Affair or Comm director. Or was, sorry.
F Can you place an exact date.
M No precise date, I believe it happened bt May 6 and the time he appeared on MTP and identified himself as Joe Wilson on July 6. I specifically remember not being surprised by who he was on MTP. I knew his name already.
F You can't give us the exact date?
M Yes.
F A number of conversations about Wilson
M Recall at least two conversation with Harlow.
F On each occasion was it a single conversatoin. Let me try the questions in English. [he botched the question] Was it a single phone call?
M I don't know if it was one or two conversatoin.
M On both occasions I was told by somebody to call or talk to Harlow. One occasion talked to press aide at NSC was directed to call Harlow. Another occasion was in Scooter's office was speaking in McLaughlin's office at CIA and from that conversation was told to talk to Harlow.
F Repeats it. First was NSC.
M His name was Michael Anton, don't recall specific title, he was one of the press, second or third press–he wasn't the press secretary–they have multiple press people.
F Who was above him in NSC
M Anna Perez
M Normal practice to speak to Perez, if I had a question I'd ask her in the morning meeting.
M I didn't normally talk to Anton. She was not around, President was in Africa, she was traveling with Condi Rice.
F Timing would have placed that conversation during time when President traveling to Africa.
M Right
F Can you describe when in office to Libby and he was speaking to someone in McLaughlin's office. How common to be present when he was speaking to someone at CIA.
M It was rare.
F what happened in office.
M standing in Scooter's office, I thought was Bob McL at the end of the conversation he and this person agreed that I would talk to Harlow, we got on the phone together. I recall that I had a conversation with Harlow. Two specific conversations.
Walton. Speaker phone/
M No, I only heard his end. At the end he asked me, but I heard them agreeing.
11:46
F Trying to get her to reconstruct the two Harlow conversations. Do you recall those conversations. Describe the conversations you had.
H First was pleasant [emphasizes] I had never spoken to him before, talked about press reports, I was asking him, "we didn't send him." so I was saying to him, you must have sent him, who is this guy, what are you saying to the press, they're not taking my word for it. I remember him being, I didn't know who he [Wilson] was either, but apparently his name is Joe Wilson he was a charge in Baghdad, and his wife works over here. I understand charge to be diplomat who works overseas. Had been a charge, former is my recollection of what that meant. Has notes, but the notes don't have a precise date. Asked to see VP and shortly thereafter told him and Scooter was there as well, told them what I had learned. It was the same day. I remember going into VP's office Scooter was there which was pretty normal. He told me Ambassador's name and apparently he was a charge and his wife works at CIA. Don't remember any specific response.
F Other convesation
M Calling Harlow to find out who was continuing to call on this story. BC story continuing to be written, we OVP still in as having sent him or traveling at behest of. Press stopped calling our office, this became truth, I think I called NSC first and then called Harlow, I can't specifically connect all this. Harlow was a little less friendly told me who was calling him, Mitchell and David Martin were working on story. Week of July 7.
F reviews this. early call with Harlow, later (during week of July 6) conversation with Anton, then Harlow.
M Week of July 7 was a busy week. I had more contact with Scooter it was particularly busy bc no one was around and there was a lot going on in the press. My staff would do a search for stories that reference VP and they would cut and paste into word document to see what media was saying. Cutting and pasting, electronically cut and paste.
F Ordinarily see ewspaper articles cut out of newspapers in VP office
M Not that often
M Sometime during that week we began monitoring TV, mostly monitoring print, normally just print. TV transcripts take longer to put up, so we weren't looking for TV. That week we started keeping track of TV. Some point had a conversation VP told me to keep track of this story, the commentators that were continuing to write on this story, and talk about us. Just myself, VP and Scooter. Occurred on Tuesday or Wednesday of that week. There's a document I've seen that helped me place the date of that.
11:56
F introduces document
M Refreshes my memory that this conversation occurred on or before July. I'd forward transcripts as soon as we got them, forward to VP assistant and Scooter's assistant. Scooter's Mayfield, VP's Jenny Hayden (sp). MSNBC's transcripts were particularly slow. We were paying attention to Hardball with Matthews, he had been talking about it.
F Did you try to get info faster?
M My press assistants were the ones doing the work. Service in WH Press office, if you want to see something, can send you shadow TV clip, you can watch it on your computer. On a couple of occasions Hannah Seeman would pull it there's a close caption very rough transcript. She would transcribe it herself. I'd send them on when they were done.
F Requests for updates on transcripts?
M I don't remember receiving them, my staff continued to get requests for more information. For a period of time after the July 6 appearance. Often came from Jenny Mayfield. I don't have a specific recollection of taking notes, but I did take some notes on evening news broadcasts. What topics were you following: the topic of 16 words, SOTU, general story of whether or not those 16 words should have been in SOTU–the whole story.
F Talking points?? Did you share with WH.
M Yes. Shared talking points with Ari for him to use in morning briefing that day was the gaggle, sent them on to Ari so he'd have the points about us not having sent this man, he would inevitably send them on.
F What's a gaggle [Holden?]
M explains the difference between gaggle and briefing. Gaggle is televised now–it's televised internally, I don't think it shows up on broadcast, but briefing is.
F Outside world, gaggle is not televised but briefing is.
M Yes.
F introduces another exhibit
M Email sent to Ari Fleischer to give him the points responding to Joe Wilson.
12:03
Email on the screen
M reads this:
- VP did not request the mission
- Was not informed
- Did not recieve briefing
- Not aware of Wilson's mission until recent press reports accounted for it.
Hey! Ari's real first name is "Lawrence."
M had already been using these, based on conversations with Scooter. I sent it bc of Wilson's Sunday blitz.
F Later talking points, brings it to her, shows it to her. She drinks water, frowning. Sits back. F brings up several other notes. She's looking to the side, can't tell who's she's looking at. blinking. Shakes her head. More blinking.
Enters talking points, and handwritten notes of talking points.
F When and how did you create this.
M Week of July 7, meeting with VP on the Hill, we had another staff meeting, so we were in on Capitol Hill. Talked to VP about press inquiries and reports related to Wilson matter. He dictated to me what he wanted me to say.
Published on board.
- Not clear who authorized travel
- Did not travel at my request
- A0parently unpaid
- Never saw document allegedly trying to verify
- He was convinced Niger could not have provided uranium to Iraq but in fact they did in 1980s 200 tons under IAEA seal
- No written report
- VP unaware of trip, conclusions, until Spring 03
- As late as October considered judgment was that SH [Saddam Hussein] had indeed undertaken vigorous effort to acquire uranium from Africa–according to NIE.
There's a question mark in the margin, F asks, did he dictate question mark.
M I didn't know if I could use that (#8) because it was classified.
12:11
M version of my typed up talking points. with some handwritten edits.
F Whose handwriting?
M Part of it's mine, and some handwriting in margins that looks like it might be Scooter's.
Published this on screen
F What's different about text?
M I completed the sentences. CLeaned them up. Under the second bullet–those are the bullets that I had sent to Ari Fleischer, our basic talking points. WRT rest of typed documnets. completing sentences. Crossed out "as late as October" and wrote in Libby's handwriting "6 months after his." Wilson 3 points: #3-1999. (looks like 1991). New last bullet says, "Six months after the Joe Wilson trip."
Shows an updated version of these talking points, with the words changed to "Six months after the Joe Wilson trip."
M 523 is the final product with the changes that were made.
F You mentioned you had a conversation with Harlow. Can you describe what you did following that phone call.
M Going to VP to give an update, it was an unscheduled visit, talked to VP and Scooter, I wasn't getting any calls directly, Mitchell and Martin doing pieces for Evening News. Discussed with them should we try to talk to them and make sure they don't repeat the things we think are false. Should we make sure we're part of the story. General consensus was "yes" and Scooter would call them back. And Libby would call them back. VP made the decision to have Scooter call them back. Went into VP ante-office, Scooter has a little office there. Scooter called one of the reporters, I was there for the portion of one of the calls. I believe this was July 8. I left, I had a lot of phone calls I still needed to return. I was still not certain about NIE and was a little uncomfortable talking about the NIE and I was aggravated that Scooter that I was calling reporters and I wasn't.
She shrugs, looks really uncomfortable, looks from side to side.
Sidebar.
12:18
Looks like the sidebar was about the NIE declassification.
F Is it fair to say you weren't part of conversations about declassifying NIE
M I had urged them to get it declassified.
F You weren't present at meetings where it was declassified. You're only testifying that in your mind there was a doubt, it was shaping what you did. You didn't ask if it was declassified.
Martin kind of slinking in chair. Jury dismissed until 1:40. But there will be discussions.
Martin standing, watiing to be dismissed, arms folded. pulls sweater down (she's wearing black sweater and shirt, light grey jacket, rather preppy outfit).
Walton. Which instruction am I being asked to give? Initial, revised, and government's version?
Walton. Why don't we come back at 1:30, see if you can work something out, if you can't I'll come up with some instruction.
Break for lunch!!!
Related posts:





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Fitz!
Can’t wait.
OMG I got in first??!!
Yeah, Cathie should be VERY interesting!
My first time in the top 10. I don’t think that I’d want to be Ms. Martin right now. Hers and her husband’s career on the line?
Thank you Marcy and Christy!
What kind of seasonings and marinade do you think Fitz has in mind for Cathie’s grilling? Teriyaki? Chipolte Lime?
Possibly. Mr. Martin was involved with the 2000 election down in Florida (Southern District, I think), worked in Ken Starrs office, and from what I have read, jsy a good ole Bush supporter. He didn’t need confirmation for the FCC position, because he had already been confirmed in 2001.
Let’s see how busy Cathie’s life has been…I believe she works for Bushco now.
And now, back to your regularly scheduled live blogging on FDL, open 24 hours a day for your convenience.
OT, and sorry if this has been posted, BUT, still think election ‘04 was not stolen?
Take a gander-
http://www.chron.com/disp/stor…..96735.html
(thanks for bolding the times, big help)
Hoo boy. Miss Martin? Is this standard court-speak, or is this more of the wife stuff? Doesn’t endear Team Libby to me.
shooogarp @
6
She’s a prosecution witness.
Waiting, chew nail, waiting, drumming fingers, waiting, banging on keyboard, waiting, waiting…
While we wait for Martin… So the jury’s official breakfast is Steak and Eggs. What is the FDL liveblogging official breakfast (aside from large quantities of coffee)?
Pat_AlexVA @
13
Hair of the dog?
capemh @
14
Coffee’s about it.
While we’re waiting…. You know, I don’t think now I am that concerned regarding whether or not Scoots actually gets significant jail time on this. At this point, even though that is what this trial is truly about, I think the detail that is coming about about how the OVP was wheeling and dealing is much more important. Even though this is not what Fitz is out to show, how Bushco sold the war to the American public with a false bill of goods, I am thinking that, based on how it is going so far, that is what is going to happen anyway.
Ah, mention of Jennifer Millerwise… when Porter Goss took over the reins at CIA, I believe she moved with him to replace someone he either ousted, or who resigned…
Quite a bunch!
So .. Fitz is cross examining Martin himself? This should be fun.
Coffee, that’s about it. Nice.
zeppo – I suspect this trial also keeps the continuing investigation moving forward.
anyone want to give odds on whether Fitz requests permission to treat Martin as a hostile witness if/when she starts obfuscating?
While there’s a little break, I thought a little Trivia might be fun:
Trivia Time
In the South Park episode “Best Friends Forever,” when Satan kills the Grma-esque demon Kevin, he appears as Martin for a few frames as he lies dead; it is almost unnoticeable without putting the scene in slow motion or looking at it frame-by-frame.
“Best Friends Forever” is episode 904 of the Comedy Central series South Park paralleling the Terri Schiavo controversy. The episode won a 2005 Emmy Award. It first aired on March 30, 2005, hours before Terri Schiavo died.
http://www.answers.com/topic/best-friends-forever
Hopefully this trial will help call out the WH hypocrisy about threatening to jail reporters who publish stories using information that was classified since when it suited their purposes, they leaked all kinds of classified stuff, and went outside normal declassification procedures.
I think that the importance placed by Libby on the Tom Cruise and P. Cruz meeting damages the credibility of his defense vis a vis too busy with important national security biz to be bothered with trying to screw the Wilsons. Libby made time to meet Top Gun and his hot latina love interest. Tabloid fodder is veddy important werk. Inquiring minds and all…
lostingeekdom @ 18
Not a cross. She’s a prosecution witness.
oregondave @ 25
Ok. Jeez .. I think I need to brush up on my L&O Mothership watching. I’m going to lose my fan creds.
Thank you Joe Wilson and Valerie Plame/Wilson for leading the Frog March.
Whatever happened to the investigation of just how the outing of Valerie effected U.s. National Security?
When will Hadleys roll in the outing come into play?
I know Ari received immunity. Do we have definitive word yet on Martin, one way or another? When would we find out?
Jane S. @ 23
YES! I didn’t think of that before but, definitely, this is one of the happy by-products of this trial. Now, all we need is for the MSM to broadcast the connection.
Jane S. @ 23
Yeah, that too. Let’s get all the dirty laundry that they have been trying to hid for so long out in the open here, for all to see.
Last night couldn’t wait to see what was on NBC Nightly News about the Libby trial. Nada! Zip! So much for MSM.
kathleen @ 27
the simple fact that brewster jennings and assoicates had to close shop is quite substantial
Just wanted to take a second during the lull in the action to thank EmptyWheel and REDD for doing this. The account is fascinating.
Can someone explain to me why Fitzgerald did not require Bush and Cheney to testify under oath about their involvement with this leak?
Is this another example that it was more important to our “supposed” justice system and a Republican controlled congress to have a President testify under oath about a BLOW JOB than for a President and Vice President to testify under oath about their involvement in the INTELLIGENCE SNOWJOB that has resulted in hundreds of thousands of dead, injured and displaced people?
What fucked up priorties!
ouiski @ 31
They’ve transfered all of their news reporting activities to Keith Olbermann. The rest of network news is just a commercial and propaganda delivery device.
Since it is now evidence in a trial, can the Kristof column be used without regard to fair use?
testing
“I remember going into VP’s office Scooter was there which was pretty normal. He told me Ambassador’s name and apparently he was a charge and his wife works at CIA.”
Boom.
anyone else having trouble seeing comments past #5?
I think it’s funny how they refer to Karl Rove as the life blood of the rethuglican party. I think they need a blood transfusion.
Pat_AlexVA @ 37
Another brick in the well crafted wall Fitz is building around Irving. The Cask of Amontillado comes to mind.
Question – why does your article heading say 8:16 AM when the content is clearly several hours later (is it somehow routed through the Pacific Time Zone?)
anonyvent – No. If you are having trouble, hit the refresh the page button on your browser rather than hitting the “refresh comments” button. If you’ve already tried that, you’re on your own.
Nice little Libby overview/summation here, BTW.
_
Don – Yes, FDL operates on Pacific time.
I thought the Kristof column was called “Missing in Action: Truth”, May 6?
Don in Brooklyn @ 42
FDL local time is Pacific, as that’s the regular time zone of Jane, the founder/host of this great place who is on the mend from surgery right now.
way behind (what else is new?). From MSNBC http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16785086/
“Former CIA Iraq Mission Manager Robert L. Grenier appeared as a government witness in the trial of Libby on charges of obstruction and lying. He testified he told Libby that the idea of sending ex-ambassador Joseph Wilson to Niger was the brainchild of Wilson’s wife, Valerie Plame, who worked in the CIA office that sent him in 2002.”
Marcy, does this square with what you heard yesterday? Sounded like Grenier said that’s “where” the idea came from, not who. Wouldn’t that mean the idea to send Amb Wilson came from the unit, not necessarily from “the wife?” Is this BS?
A funny from yesterday’s blogscript of Craig Schmall:
C You don’t remember that Fitz and Zeidenberg were there?
S No, I don’t remember that
C You’re teling me Mr. Fitzgerald is forgettable.
S I don’t want to go that far.
LOL
I remember hearing Jow wilson stating that his wife RECOMMENDED him for the job. It’s just the right wing medias’ way of trying to muddy the waters
David Martin
The reporter Harlow told Cathie Martin was calling him is the CBS reporter who interviewed Armitage.
Sorry Joe Wilson, I type with a pencil in my mouth, so shit happens!!!
hackworth @
24
It’s semi-tabloid stuff, but I put it more in the category of dealing with lobbyists/donors and their particular issues. Scientology was/is concerned about how they are treated abroad (in this case, in Germany), and Top Gun Tom wanted to see if he could use his influence to get some help.
And given that BushCo doesn’t have a lot of public friends in Hollywood, I’m sure Scooter wanted to at least give the appearance of trying to help, regardless of whatever came of the meetings later.
Happens a lot with big donors and “important” lobbyists – in both parties. Even if they don’t get what they want, being able to say “I took this to my friends in the White House” helps soothe the pain of whatever’s bothering them.
Tap Duncan @ 52
Preview is your friend. (Mine
totwotoo!)testing 123
Really appreciate the continued updates. I posted another link at my blog today, including info on how to donate to this worthy cause.
OT…Working on my page about Douglas Adams and found some new You Tube stuff. They are both just audio files, with a picture of Douglas Adams, but were really interesting to listen to. Thoughts about God, or the lack thereof.
ouiski @ 31
During their coverage of the SOTU on Wednesday evening both Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews tried to cover their asses “once again” in their complicity (by not being more aggressive in their line of questioning the claims being repeated) in the run up to the invasion. They spin this myth to protect their own failings.
Olbermann said “we all suspended criticism”
Matthews said “we have all been part of group think up until recently”.
What a pile of crap that these guys are standing in.
Million of Americans marched against the invasion. And those millions were made up of WWII, Korean, Vietnam, Desert Storm Vets, teachers, plumbers, students, grandmothers in wheelchairs and families pushing babies in strollers etc etc. The little coverage that these programs did broadcast would show the 20 people amongst hundreds of thousands who had black hoods over their heads over and over again.(I was watching closely)
These guys did not do their jobs prior to the invasion and now they want to include the American public in their very serious lack of providing fair and balanced coverage in the run-up to the invasion. Millions of middle class Americans were questioning out on the streets!
I wonder if Matthews and Olbermann will show the world who is really at these marches this Saturday in Washington Jan.27th? Now that they are trying to cover their collective asses?
revdeb@35
Yes, I watch KO but I wanted to see what was being put forth for those not hip enough to watch KO.
Best laugh of the morning thus far, from Byron York:
Right, Byron.
Remember that line from Terms of Endearment: “My daughter is in pain. Give her the medicine.” That is how I feel while I wait the 15 minutes to push refresh.
hey all, still cannot see past comment #5, and have to re-enter name and e-mail fields each time I try to post- I do not have to do that on previous thread. Strange, eh? Oh well, sorry to be missing all the great comments here.
Go Fitz!!!
Anonyvent – See the end of last thread for how to clear out your cache if you use IE, which may help you.
Outside the beltway
Another “non-transcript” site, for those who can’t wait or have time on their hands.
Or reboot your computer, which usually cures most ills.
Grenier part 2, typo, analyst on loaN. See comment at/near end.
Because we want the history books, which will be using these blogposts as the basis for understanding the trial, to get the correct information.
[Mod Note, thanks egregious. We love you.]
Christy’s summary was great, here’s a Fitzmas song for you all
On the first day of Fitzmas my true love gave to me
Grossman, who was man number three
On the second day of Fitzmas my true love gave to me
Swans don’t swim in sewers, A deputy director, a CIA briefer and Grossman who was man number three.
On the third day of Fitzmas my true love gave to me
Cheney spanking Blitzer,
Lame Duck Resolutions,
Swans don’t swim in sewers,
A deputy Director,
A CIA debriefer
And Grossman who was man number three.
Martin: “I understand charge to be diplomat who works overseas.”
Unbelievable! She’s a senior staffer in both policy and press relations, and doesn’t know what a chargé is? It’s the senior career diplomat at an embassy.
Good grief!!
I love the way Martin had the sense to put the question mark next to #8. She didn’t know Cheney had a magic wand that made it ok to leak classified information.
And btw the 1.7 lb baby had a successful operation, put a band on the pulmonary artery. You could hold the entire baby in one hand.
I am trying to explain to my colleagues why this trial is so important. The judicial system here…never mind.
I try to read slower, or I force myself to go do something mundane to kill time. Like floss my teeth, wash a plate, milk the cow, feed the squirrels, eat cheetos, shine my shoes, etc., etc.,etc.Jane S. @ 60
If this is how the trial’s going to go, if Cheney’s really takes the stand, it should be an amazing spectacle.
Badwater @ 71
Yeah. He could pull a “Blitzer”
O/T -
Obama Hussein bin Bar-al-Qaeda has called for Universal Health Care.
Quick! Somebody alert Glenn Beck and Denise Prager!
_
kathleen @27
And thanks for your nice post!
Lawyer challenges Bush Special Prosecutor
Badwater @ 71
If he can’t take Blitzen asking questions, how’s he gonna handle Fitz!!?
I am just loving this Martin testimony!
Tap Duncan @ 39
Or cupping.
Email sent to Ari Fleischer to give him the points responding to Joe Wilson.
- VP did not request the mission
[VP did request of the CIA briefer that a report of an attempt by Iraq to establish trade relations with Niger be investigated to determine if they were after Uranium]
- Was not informed
[I don’t recall if we have evidence pertinaing to a briefing of Cheney on this particular matter.]
- Did not recieve briefing
[huh? VP likes to beat a dead horse.]
- Not aware of Wilson’s mission until recent press reports accounted for it.
[probably true but so what?]
spurious @
78
Rove is Rasputin with out the rakish sexuality.
-GSD
Yuk. She worked for Cornyn.
Has the Martin baby been appointed to a position in the Administration?
Eeep.
Cornyn. One of the worst hatchet men in the Republic Party.
-GSD
GSD @ 80
I think he’s starting to look more and more like Dr. Evil “When I say I want sharks with frickin’ laser beams on their heads, I want sharks with frickin’ laser beams on their heads!!”
I think I’d best do a supermarket run. I hope everyone has a delicious lunch!
Scooter’s defense is that he was too busy with more important matters to remember to tell the truth about his involvement in the OVPs response to the Wilson Op-Ed piece, digg this:
Fitz: Whose handwriting?
Martin: Part of it’s mine, and some handwriting in margins that looks like it might be Scooter’s.
[Published this on screen]
Fitz: What’s different about text?
Martin: I completed the sentences. Cleaned them up. Under the second bullet–those are the bullets that I had sent to Ari Fleischer, our basic talking points. WRT rest of typed documnets. completing sentences. Crossed out “as late as October” and wrote in Libby’s handwriting “6 months after his.” Wilson 3 points: #3-1999. (looks like 1991). New last bullet says, “Six months after the Joe Wilson trip.”
Shows an updated version of these talking points, with the words changed to “Six months after the Joe Wilson trip.”
—————————
Too busy to remember to tell the truth.
Nuts, and it’s only 9:30 here on the west coast. Looks like I might actually have to do some work.
Larry Johnson on the vindication of Joe Wilson.
-GSD
BobbyG @ 73
catchy name.
I’m so proud of Larry Johnson. He might have kept quiet like too many others are doing.
lina @ 88
Latest right-wing smear suggests that Obama is a covert operative for the Continent of Africa. The wingers are eating this up with a fork and spoon.
Badwater @ 71
I can’t wait until The Dick tells Fitz that
1. he “doesn’t accept the premise of your question”
2. he thinks Fitz’s question is “hogwash”
3. Fitz has “gone over the line”
4. Fitz should “go fuck yourself.”
That’ll really help Scooter a lot. BTW, The Dick ducked questions about the trial from Wolfie because he “going to be a witness at the trial.” So as of yesterday, Cheney testimony is a go.
Ask yourself the question, is Martin’s career in government as a Republican party appointee FINISHED, as a result of her testifying truthfully in this trial?
I would say YES, in much the same way the JAG attorney who represented Hamdi – who was doing his job and his duty as an officer and conducting himself as as an honorable human being – lost his career doing his job. His termination was a necessity, it was the choice of his superiors who valued their careers more than their responsibilities, and it was the standard operating procedure of the bullying administration, which takes no prisoners. With us, on our terms, or against us. I think we need a recall.
Something is very wrong in our country when upstanding people, who do the honorable thing, lose their jobs as a result while deceptive lying senior white house officials intentionally, or at the very least incompetently, start irresponsible ill-advised, aggressive wars of choice based on specious evidence.
The biggest cost of Cheney’s and Bush’s expanding POTUS’ powers combined with their penchent for extreme secrecy is their ability to wreak more havoc by virtue of their poorly concieved policies and conceal the results.
hackworth @
90
Or, as the Presidunce would say, “the nation of Africa.”
_
Chris Dodd, Part II is upstairs.
Ms. Martin has relayed some interesting and incriminating bits. Cute was: Scooters little office in the VP ante-room.
Not unusual for Scoots and The Penguin to hang out together in the VP’s office. (Like a couple of conniving buddies.) Newspaper cutouts in VP’s office not found that often – I think Fitz could have pressed her a bit here. How often? Like every frikkin’ day?
Cheney and Scoots were tracking the media heavily and habitually after Wilson’s revelation(s).
RevDeb @ 41
RevDeb–
Great literary allusion, and appropriate for this scandal, but I have a different take.
In the Cask of Amantillado, the narrator is building a brick wall around a perceived enemy for his “thousand sins”. There is never any evidence of any such sins and the more we look at the story, the more we see that the narrator is increasingly deranged and his fears of the ironically-named Fortunato are probably groundless. The horror of the story is that he is preparing an innocent man for an unspeakable death by building a tomb of bricks, each one lain provoking a new, fantastic outrage.
The narrator is the administration of George Bush. The bricks are the case for the war. Fortunato, whose face is best seen as Joe Wilson, represents all of us.
hackworth @ 95
I noticed that, too. It sounded like they had an entire operation set up whose job it was to do nothing else but monitor what was going on in the press and television. I don’t suppose I shoudl be too surprised about that, but it does seem that the OVP should have better things to do than constantly worry about what was being said about them.
hackworth @ 95
But that might actually work to Fitz’s advantage. The fact that THIS one was hanging around the office, highlights the importance of it to him.
Neil @ 92 “His termination [not] was a necessity”
Tap Duncan @ 50
This is my recollection. The yellowcake subject came up in a meeting at the CIA that Valerie Plame attended. She said her husband has contacts in that part of Africa. She was told to ask if he would consider going. He said yes with caveats. I don’t remember what they were. As a US Rep, Diplomatic authority or what. And it was pro bono. Also, he never said the OVP sent him. He said the OVP asked the CIA the Niger question and he went at the behest of the CIA.
Not the right thread but am afraid. A man, not the hotel employee that I was expecting with info, tried to come into my hotel room [yes my mistake], I stopped him with the slammed door but am still shaking and wondering WHAT THE HELL am I doing here and why do I bother with this uncivilized country. Then I realize my country of origin is not exactly civilized. Seeking another option. Your advice please.
neil @
92
I don’t think it’s a coincidence that she moved from the OVP to the WH in early 2004, which is probably about the time she testified before Fitz’s grand jury.
kathleen @ 57 Is that you Kathleen: one of the Cornbloggers? Give them hell in DC Saturday.
Who else is going to protest the war?
egregious @ 101
Lock the door, call someone you know, ask for help from a Russian contact you trust, speak to the management. Do not panic.
egregious @ 101. Call the front desk. Explain. Ask for hotel security.
Waiting for testimony about AF2 and the the Cooper conversation. Why doesn’t Fitz ask Martin about when it was decided to make Wilson and Plame the story to divert attention away from Wilson’s criticisms?
egregious @ 101
are you safe now? did you call the front desk? is there someone local you can call?
hoping you are ok….
sometimes i fear we humans aren’t as civilized as we like to pretend. i think of you as one of the people trying to create a more civilized world…
Sectarian warfare? Militias and death squads? Sprawling anarchy and mass deaths? None of that is a problem. Everything is going great in Iraq — everything, that is, except for one thing. The “biggest threat” is the debate taking place in the U.S. over whether our Leader is doing the right thing — the true threat to the Glorious War in Iraq is Jim Webb’s response to the Leader and Sen. Hagel’s disobedience and Sen. Warner’s criticisms of the Leader’s plans and opposition to the war (shared by an overwhelming majority of Americans). That’s what Cheney argued (and A.L. has an excellent discussion of the well-deserved problem for the Republican Party posed by the mindless loyalty to the President’s war rhetoric which they have bred).
The idea that Americans should refrain from debating the propriety of using military force is about as foreign to our political traditions as anything can be. The Constitution — while making the President the top General in directing how citizen-approved wars are fought — ties the use of military force to the approval of the American citizenry in multiple ways, not only by prohibiting wars in the absence of a Congressional declaration (though it does impose that much-ignored requirement), but also by requiring Congressional approval every two years merely to have an army.
More HERE on the debate about our war Policy.
neil @ 103
Yes….I’ll tell you who is going to give them hell, the hundreds of thousands (nationwide millions world wide tens of millions) who marched before they invaded. Plus the millions more who have now become aware of the truth. The Bush administration lied about WMD’s Plame and simple!
Nellieh @ 100
Thanks, you know I loaned my Joe Wilson biography to a friend, so I had nothing to reference. I did check at Larry Johnsons’ blog, and had my memory refreshed even more.
Peterr @
67
charg d’affaires | sh rˌ zh ā dˈfer| (also charg) noun ( pl. chargs d’affaires | sh rˈzā(z)|) a diplomatic official who temporarily takes the place of an ambassador. • a state’s diplomatic representative in a minor country.
neil @ 103
redshift said he would be there. i’m going to try to make it…
litigatormom @ 91
Fitz needs to start practicing “Strike answer as non-responsive.” I have a feeling he’ll be saying it a lot. ;-)
Pachacutec @
11
Thanks Pach. Sometimes our leashes get tangled up. We deeply appreciate your deft touch keeping all this sorted out. ;->
why shdnt i just quit. they destroy my suitcase with supplies for THEIR newborns. they try to close our surgical unit because they see we are successful. strange people follow me. i hate this. for some reason God asks me to work here. door is triple locked and my local contact will guard. but this is typical. as my mental health improves i become less tolerant of indignities. as on egrBlog i am perfect for this work being mentally ill because no one in their right mind wd do this.
i will wake up tommorow, pick up my fired o’glake, and engage in battle once again. the 2 week old baby with transposition. blood from heart doesnt reach lungs for required oxygen. i find myself in surprising sympathy w this. need some oxygen myself.
thx for fdl lv, i’ll be ok always have before just not so public except for last summer. apprec yr prayers. f*cking country.
anonyvent @
61
I left several more ideas downstairs at the end of the thread (#s 204, 205).
neil @ 103
I’ll be there, supposed to be around 50 on Saturday. Bringing my suntan lotion.
neil @ 105
i did.
egregious @ 118
Call the embassy?
It’s 1:30pm EST, are we back yet? ;-)
selise @ 112
We know who will be at the anti-war march this Saturday. It will be the hundreds of thousands of middle Americans that marched against the invasion in Oct 2002 and Feb of 2003 that Olbermann and Matthews did not cover on their national news. It will be those hundreds of thousands(thatadded up to millions nationwide)of WWII, Vietnam,Korean,and Desert Storm Vets, teahers, families,seniors, students and others that they failed to interview on their news programs before the invasion. Joined by hundreds of thousands of more Americans who were finally told the truth on the MSM that all of the damn WMD Bushit that was shoved down Americans throats prior to the invasion was false.
That is who will be there marching this Saturday. THE QUESTION IS WILL THE MSM FINALLY DO THEIR JOBS AND COVER THESE MARCHES ACCURATELY?
litigatormom @ 91
Ahhh. Some others who watched that blitzed interview last night. Unbelievagable! Gonna take some powerful meds to keep that steam canner from blowing up & spewing beans all over the ceiling if he’s meetin’ up w/ Fitz on the front burner. Woo Hoo!
I’m getting the sense that Fitz had enough evidence to convict Libby of something worse than obstruction of justice. Could he be aiming higher? :)
Libby and….
GSD @
82
also worked for Mary Mataline… one of the worst hatchet women in the Republic Party
BobbyG @
59
Uh-huh. Of course, Byron didn’t say, exactly, WHAT those “holes” were. I suggest that they only existed when he pulled them out of his own ass.
egregious @ 115
I wish I could do more for you right now than offer you feeble words of support. Don’t let the SOBs get to you. You are doing more good than most of us could even imagine. Prayers and good thoughts for your safety.
k.
ps–Is there a way I can send some small financial donation to help you out? Can’t afford much, but, maybe it’ll help some.
Peterr @
67
That’s the thing about the Bushistas: They are ALL nothing but zampolit. All of them. They are political hacks who are utterly incompetent at everything but hackery and thievery, and the only reason they’ve got this far is that they’ve had the media in their corner.
Holy shit…
Cathie Martin is saying that on June 11th, she went into the VP’x office, that Libby was there, and that she said that Wilson’s wife worked at the CIA. (this info was NOT in the indictment–the indictment talks about Grenier telling Libby, but not about Martin going to the VP’s office….)
According to the indictment, the next day Dick Cheney tells Libby that Valerie worked for the Counter Proliferation division aka “Covert Ops” — and Libby believes that Cheney got this info from the CIA.
Now, if Cheney was in his office when Martin talks about Valerie, and the very next day Cheney tells Libby what DIVISION Valerie worked in….
well, I think you can see where this is headed….
p.lukasiak @ 129
YOu mean, further evidence for Libby’s bad memory!? :-P
Phoenix Woman @ 128
give jr. credit… he said he’s consistant. he just didn’t elaborate on how, except to say lots, ooooogh!
p.lukasiak @ 129
cheney called someone (WHO??!!??) at the cia and asked who was valerie and where did she work?
“I remember going into VP’s office Scooter was there which was pretty normal. He told me Ambassador’s name and apparently he was a charge and his wife works at CIA.”
Who is “he”? Scooter or VP?
I don’t see where “she said Wilson’s wife worked at CIA”, I read that she says he said… But not sure which HE she is referring to.
(waiting for my head to explode now)
neil @
85
I haven’t decided if Cathie Martin is Jeb Stuart Magruder or John Dean.
So, these hard working officials basically email the press what to write and they write a story around the BushCo talking points.
And they call themselves journalists? Tim Russert and such are puppets for the propaganda arm of the government.
selise @ 132
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you The Smoking Gun.
Apparently, she is being honest since she most likely gave the same testimony to the Grand Jury beofre she knew Scooter was going to be the focus/charged.
Help – I need a timeline to keep all these dates straight. I wish EW’s book was here. ARGHH!
Is this Martin conversation before or after the one yesterday where Libby was told about Plame?
ccmask @ 135
Yes, and I don’t know if you saw my point earlier in part one of today’s Libby posts on how this seems to be continuing with the NYT’s covering of the trial. Alas, no one seems to have responded to that.
Meaning “I was aggravated that Scooter said that I was calling reporters and I wasn’t”?
Scooter was claiming Cathie Martin was calling around telling stuff to reporters when she shouldn’t have been?
New piece up on Raw on Iran war buildup – plus an article in progress. http://www.rawstory.com/news/2….._0125.html
kathleen @ 34
The issue of taking a sworn oath is merely symbolic. When you are speaking to a Federal Prosecutor or the FBI about an ongoing investigation one is required to speak honestly and not present deceiving or misleading information.
It’s assumed that those in executive positions are aware of their duties. If you lie, it’s a crime. Swearing of oaths are simply a formality.
Garrett @ 140
or a typo and that “I was aggravated that Scooter was calling reporters and I wasn’t” (it was her job to liason with the press)?
I am trying not to clog up the servers with comments, but the wait is killing me….!!!
capemh @ 75
Finally!!
choochmac @ 143
I read it this way; but time will soon tell which is the accurate
They’re back!!!
New thread – Cathie Martin 2
ok, now i’m confused… going back to emptywheel’s notes:
does this mean that:
a) harlow told martin who then told cheney & libby?
or
b) cheney told martin in libby’s presence?
i read p.lukasiak @ 129 to mean it is a).
is that correct? or am i even more confused than i thought?
Pat_AlexVA @ 133
“He” is Harlow. Martin goes into Cheney’s office, and reports to Libby (and one assumes, Cheney) what she’s was told by Harlow.
Here is the whole quote…
“He” has to refer to Harlow — Martin is relating what she learned to Cheney and Libby, and doesn’t remember any specific response.
(remember, this is not a transcript, this is live blogging…. a transcript would probably look like this
Is anyone else wondering if that business with “we don’t have clear copies of the documents and need half a day to prepare” was a ploy to get Martin’s testimony postponed until some other day? I’ve no doubt that there’s a big difference between American Bar Association lawyering and Screenwriter’s Guild lawyering, but given some of Martin’s testimony, I have to wonder if Wells was looking for a way to keep the jury from spending a three-day weekend mentally replaying what they’ve heard today.
p.lukasiak @ 148 – that is how i read it also, but Pat_AlexVA @ 133’s comment made me realize it could be read differently. hopefully emptywheel will clarify.
Richmond @ 139
I agree with you there. The name Izzy Stone comes to my mind…
Is the 1999 supposed to signify a year?
Just wondering because the link to Larry Johnson provided above mentions 1999 twice:
a.) on p. 46 of the July 2004 SSCI report on Iraq. (Rethug heresay: “Nigerian officials admitted that the Iraqi delegation had traveled there in 1999″)
b.) “Former Prime Minister Mayaki told Joe he had rebuffed an effort in June of 1999 to arrange a meeting with the Iraqis he supported the U.S. sanction.”
Nellieh mentions above that Wilson’s trip was pro bono. The #3 talking point of the 8 fixed up for Ari according to Martin:
“3. Apparently unpaid”.
They’re soooooo transparent.
They went as far back and with as much detail as possible didn’t they trying to cover their asses and destroy the Wilsons. It makes you wonder just how many years (and what else they’ve done) they worked so hard to destroy Brewster Jennings before 2003, their main blockage to insuring a ME oil pipeline and New World Order PNAC bullshit.
Ok, maybe I read the later sentence too literally.
“Asked to see VP and shortly thereafter told him and Scooter was there as well, told them what I had learned. It was the same day. I remember going into VP’s office Scooter was there which was pretty normal. He told me Ambassador’s name and apparently he was a charge and his wife works at CIA. Don’t remember any specific response. “
Martin was indicating what Harlow told Martin. I read this incorrectly, I thought Martin was saying that Libby or VP said this… My bad.
Phoenix Woman @ 126. Uh-huh. Of course, Byron didn’t say, exactly, WHAT those “holes” were. I suggest that they only existed when he pulled them out of his own ass.
I wonder;
Is Byron York there in the press room, learning first hand?
What sources has he spoken with/which articles has he read?
He sounds less informed than I am but not to worry, he doesn’t have to be informed to be effective. He’s preaching to the choir and opinions are like a$$holes, everyone’s got one.
Peterr @ 67
Yes, the “Ambassador” is usually the flunky who is the Presidential political appointment, either someone with a “name” to impress the local dignataries, or who simply wants the posting for the opportunity to give government-paid soirees with the elites in Europe.
On occassion an Ambassador will be appointed with real knowledge of the area or particular political acumen. But in general that role is left to the “Charges D’Affaires”.
When April Glaspie was pulled from Iraq after her notorious “green light” to Saddam regarding his intention to invade Kuwait, it was Joe Wilson who was left to handle the blowback.
Is this Martin conversation before or after the one yesterday where Libby was told about Plame?
after Grossman told libby on the June 10th, and Grenier (supposedly) told Libby himself on June 11th.
***********
is that correct? or am i even more confused than i thought?
I’m pretty sure its correct… look at the actual construction.
again…keep in mind this is liveblogging…
Martin was indicating what Harlow told Martin. I read this incorrectly, I thought Martin was saying that Libby or VP said this… My bad.
don’t apologize… it took me a while to figure it out…
neil @ 79
What amazes me is that the VP was so intent on finding out whether there was a smidgen of evidence regarding the a Niger-Iraq transaction…and yet he asserts that he never received any of the reports that denied that such a transaction was plausible?
Remember that Joe Wilson’s debriefing “circulated through normal intelligence channels”; that US Ambassador to Niger, Barbro Owens-Fitzpatrick sent a report back to the State Department (INR) declaiming the implausibility of said “contracts”; and that the highest ranking US General in NATO, General Carlton Fulford, sent the Pentagon (DIA?) his statement that rumors of such a transaction were rubbish. Both Kilpatrick and Fulford debriefed Wilson about his findings when they were all together in Niger.
Yet NONE OF THESE REPORTS EVER ATTRACTED NOTICE OF CHENEY????
Either there was a selective filter in place…or Cheney’s lying!
Will the very capable bloggers at firedoglake be present every day throughout the trial?
I’ve been following the Wilson/Plame case from the beginning & I’d love to follow the trial through your excellent reporting.
Nellieh @ 100
I recall that Wilson WAS recommended by Plame back in 1999 for a similar trip to Niger when there were reports that IRAN (not Iraq) had attempted to procure yellowcake [Note: THIS has importance as to what Plame’s role in Brewster-Jennings and Counter-Proliferation was…and why the CIA still refuses to declassify he status despite the fact that IRAQ’s nuclear programs have long since been shown to be nada, and the regime is dead and buried].
Wilson, in his debriefing on the 2003 trip mentioned to the debriefer the discoveries on that mission as it related to the reliability of his sources (they were previously forthcoming about Iranian…and Pakistani…efforts to Wilson).
But, it appears that someone else in the CPD initiated contact with Plame about getting her husband to undertake a SECOND mission (the one in 2002) to resolve the VP’s conundrum. Plame was outside the loop regarding any requests re. IRAQ intelligence…someone else who knew of Cheney’s request recalled that Wilson had previously undertaken the mission in 1999…and approached Plame to speak to her husband about undertaking this new inquiry.
Given what they both already knew about the unlikelihood of Niger being capable of shipping such materails out (Plame to her husband: “Some crazy idea about Iraq smuggling yellowcake from Niger.”) Wilson was decidely reticent.
Plame ESCORTED and INTRODUCED Wilson to the “briefing” and confab where his mission was debated between members of the INR, WINPAC, and the CIA’s Directorate of Operations.
When Wilson heard INR’s concerns (which largely matched his own) at his briefing, he insisted on getting the thumbs-up from Babro Owens-Fitzpatrick before he went. She insisted that she be the one to speak to CURRENT Nigerien officials, and that Wilson restrict his discussions to former officials and businessmen that he had close contacts with.
This division of turf seemed to assuage the INR and Directorate of Operations…although both pointed out that any Nigerien actually involved in making some sort of deal would be less than forthcoming. But the hope was that if there were an actual transaction then some source, past or present, may have heard about it. As one of the participants at the meeting offered “It was worth a try.”
Kristine @ 127
thx, actually i need prayers much more than money. trying to remember why doing good is worth it.
egregious @ 161
for the children. and for yourself.
blessings to you e.
kristine—dont know why you think feeble words of support wdnt be the greatest possible gift, to someone about to quit this work for lack of courage.
This is getting tought for Republicans to spin. I’m suprised they weren’t upset about this whole thing from the start, but I guess it just didn’t rise to the level of Whitewater.
Dead Horse @ 123
I have always thought so.