<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And In Other News . . .</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/25/and-in-other-news-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/25/and-in-other-news-2/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:03:58 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Grandma Jo</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/25/and-in-other-news-2/#comment-474948</link>
		<dc:creator>Grandma Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 04:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/25/and-in-other-news-2/#comment-474948</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Grandma J, from the other Grandma Jo, I might be interested in “sharing” a room in Chicago.  I’m trying to get my hubby to go with me but he really doesn’t want to.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can e-mail me at 123jwc (at) sbcglobal (dot) net.  I don’t check that address every day but will try to check it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grandma J, from the other Grandma Jo, I might be interested in “sharing” a room in Chicago.  I’m trying to get my hubby to go with me but he really doesn’t want to.</p>
<p>Can e-mail me at 123jwc (at) sbcglobal (dot) net.  I don’t check that address every day but will try to check it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: montag</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/25/and-in-other-news-2/#comment-474911</link>
		<dc:creator>montag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 03:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/25/and-in-other-news-2/#comment-474911</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-474895&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;rumi @ 173&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I’m just concerned that there is too much support for action against Iran that the neocons and BushCo won’t let this once in a lifetime chance slip away. I can’t foresee any military action in Iran that doesn’t result in decades of mutual killing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hell, there’s probably going to be decades of killing in Iraq, as it is. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As for Iran, I doubt Congress will do anything substantive to stop Bush, or at least, anything in time. Someone will want to hold hearings, or request–and then wait for–a new NIE on Iran. If that happens, Bush and Co.™ will see their window of opportunity start to close, and there’s more likelihood of an attack than not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hate to sound cynical, but….&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-474895"><em>rumi @ 173</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>I’m just concerned that there is too much support for action against Iran that the neocons and BushCo won’t let this once in a lifetime chance slip away. I can’t foresee any military action in Iran that doesn’t result in decades of mutual killing.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Hell, there’s probably going to be decades of killing in Iraq, as it is. </p>
<p>As for Iran, I doubt Congress will do anything substantive to stop Bush, or at least, anything in time. Someone will want to hold hearings, or request–and then wait for–a new NIE on Iran. If that happens, Bush and Co.™ will see their window of opportunity start to close, and there’s more likelihood of an attack than not.</p>
<p>Hate to sound cynical, but….</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rumi</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/25/and-in-other-news-2/#comment-474903</link>
		<dc:creator>rumi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 03:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/25/and-in-other-news-2/#comment-474903</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-474885&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;mui @ 172&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
That’s called Congress not living up to their responsibilities on a rogue preznit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;yup…just to be clear, I agree with you and support your efforts on that resolution or any possible resolution that might have an effect. I think these are needed for future accountability, I hope so anyway.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-474885"><em>mui @ 172</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>
That’s called Congress not living up to their responsibilities on a rogue preznit.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>yup…just to be clear, I agree with you and support your efforts on that resolution or any possible resolution that might have an effect. I think these are needed for future accountability, I hope so anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omiros</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/25/and-in-other-news-2/#comment-474902</link>
		<dc:creator>Omiros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 03:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/25/and-in-other-news-2/#comment-474902</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I’m all for impeachment of Bush!  It bugs me to think that Cheney will be the one replacing him, should this come to pass.  Oh well - at least Bush will get what he deserves…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Imagine the timing: By the end of 2007, impeachment takes place; then we have Cheney for about a year…to further embarass the Rupublicans…Seems sweet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can they BOTH be impeached?  Then we’d have Pelosi in…Wow.  Sweet dreams, all!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m all for impeachment of Bush!  It bugs me to think that Cheney will be the one replacing him, should this come to pass.  Oh well &#8211; at least Bush will get what he deserves…</p>
<p>Imagine the timing: By the end of 2007, impeachment takes place; then we have Cheney for about a year…to further embarass the Rupublicans…Seems sweet.</p>
<p>Can they BOTH be impeached?  Then we’d have Pelosi in…Wow.  Sweet dreams, all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rumi</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/25/and-in-other-news-2/#comment-474895</link>
		<dc:creator>rumi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 03:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/25/and-in-other-news-2/#comment-474895</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-474873&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;montag @ 169&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-474869&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;rumi @ 168&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
  When did Congress authorize these airstrikes?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.swissinfo.org/eng/international/ticker/detail/U_S_confirms_second_air_strike_in_Somalia.html?siteSect=143&amp;sid=7461087&amp;cKey=1169689975000&quot;&gt;U.S. confirms second air strike in Somalia&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;War Powers Act comes into play on this. Bush can do it all by his little lonesome on an emergency basis. All he has to do is notify Congress of the reasons in either sixty or ninety days (sorry, can’t remember at the moment which). At that point, Congress can authorize or tell the Prez no more. That’s roughly the way the War Powers Act works.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  That was my understanding of just one of the ways he can legally do it. hell…many are cheering this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  It’s the same as the illegal surveillance issue and the war in Iraq. They claim, or actually have, the authority to initiate and conduct actions that have irreversible consequences. We can’t leave Iraq because the original mistake made it too dangerous now. BushCo didn’t care so much about how we got into Iraq, only that we did.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  I’m just concerned that there is too much support for action against Iran that the neocons and BushCo won’t let this once in a lifetime chance slip away. I can’t foresee any military action in Iran that doesn’t result in decades of mutual killing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-474873"><em>montag @ 169</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-474869"><em>rumi @ 168</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>
  When did Congress authorize these airstrikes?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.swissinfo.org/eng/international/ticker/detail/U_S_confirms_second_air_strike_in_Somalia.html?siteSect=143&amp;sid=7461087&amp;cKey=1169689975000">U.S. confirms second air strike in Somalia</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>War Powers Act comes into play on this. Bush can do it all by his little lonesome on an emergency basis. All he has to do is notify Congress of the reasons in either sixty or ninety days (sorry, can’t remember at the moment which). At that point, Congress can authorize or tell the Prez no more. That’s roughly the way the War Powers Act works.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>  That was my understanding of just one of the ways he can legally do it. hell…many are cheering this.</p>
<p>  It’s the same as the illegal surveillance issue and the war in Iraq. They claim, or actually have, the authority to initiate and conduct actions that have irreversible consequences. We can’t leave Iraq because the original mistake made it too dangerous now. BushCo didn’t care so much about how we got into Iraq, only that we did.</p>
<p>  I’m just concerned that there is too much support for action against Iran that the neocons and BushCo won’t let this once in a lifetime chance slip away. I can’t foresee any military action in Iran that doesn’t result in decades of mutual killing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mui</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/25/and-in-other-news-2/#comment-474885</link>
		<dc:creator>mui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 03:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/25/and-in-other-news-2/#comment-474885</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-474869&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;rumi @ 168 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-474842&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;mui @ 167&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;rumi @ 119.&lt;a href=&quot;http://jones.house.gov/release.cfm?id=472&quot;&gt;Joint Resolution&lt;/a&gt;, introduced by a Representative Walter B. Jones (R-NC) via the Nation: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/blogs/notion?bid=15&amp;pid=158586&quot;&gt; No blank check.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  Oh, yeah, I support all of these resolutions but I don’t think BushCo will recognize them as legitimate. These guys have created laws, some with Congressional approval, to give them the power that these resolutions want to block.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;“Our constitution states that–while the Commander in Chief has the power to conduct wars–only Congress has the power to authorize war,”&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  When did Congress authorize these airstrikes?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.swissinfo.org/eng/international/ticker/detail/U_S_confirms_second_air_strike_in_Somalia.html?siteSect=143&amp;sid=7461087&amp;cKey=1169689975000&quot;&gt;U.S. confirms second air strike in Somalia&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That’s called Congress not living up to their responsibilities on a rogue preznit.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-474869"><em>rumi @ 168 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-474842"><em>mui @ 167</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>rumi @ 119.<a href="http://jones.house.gov/release.cfm?id=472">Joint Resolution</a>, introduced by a Representative Walter B. Jones (R-NC) via the Nation: <a href="http://www.thenation.com/blogs/notion?bid=15&amp;pid=158586"> No blank check.</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>  Oh, yeah, I support all of these resolutions but I don’t think BushCo will recognize them as legitimate. These guys have created laws, some with Congressional approval, to give them the power that these resolutions want to block.</p>
<p><i>“Our constitution states that–while the Commander in Chief has the power to conduct wars–only Congress has the power to authorize war,”</i></p>
<p>  When did Congress authorize these airstrikes?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.swissinfo.org/eng/international/ticker/detail/U_S_confirms_second_air_strike_in_Somalia.html?siteSect=143&amp;sid=7461087&amp;cKey=1169689975000">U.S. confirms second air strike in Somalia</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>That’s called Congress not living up to their responsibilities on a rogue preznit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mui</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/25/and-in-other-news-2/#comment-474878</link>
		<dc:creator>mui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 03:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/25/and-in-other-news-2/#comment-474878</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.j.res.00014:&quot;&gt;Status of H.J.RES.14  &lt;/a&gt;Concerning the use of military force by the United States against Iran.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.j.res.00014:">Status of H.J.RES.14  </a>Concerning the use of military force by the United States against Iran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyG</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/25/and-in-other-news-2/#comment-474874</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 03:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/25/and-in-other-news-2/#comment-474874</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I would suggest that the reference to republican senators be completed with their coming election year, e.g. Senator Sununu (R-N.H.-2008)&lt;br /&gt;
BTW, went to Dukem for dinner tonight and found it absolutely delicious.  Must go back to try the rest of the menu.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would suggest that the reference to republican senators be completed with their coming election year, e.g. Senator Sununu (R-N.H.-2008)<br />
BTW, went to Dukem for dinner tonight and found it absolutely delicious.  Must go back to try the rest of the menu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: montag</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/25/and-in-other-news-2/#comment-474873</link>
		<dc:creator>montag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 03:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/25/and-in-other-news-2/#comment-474873</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-474869&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;rumi @ 168&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
  When did Congress authorize these airstrikes?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.swissinfo.org/eng/international/ticker/detail/U_S_confirms_second_air_strike_in_Somalia.html?siteSect=143&amp;sid=7461087&amp;cKey=1169689975000&quot;&gt;U.S. confirms second air strike in Somalia&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;War Powers Act comes into play on this. Bush can do it all by his little lonesome on an emergency basis. All he has to do is notify Congress of the reasons in either sixty or ninety days (sorry, can’t remember at the moment which). At that point, Congress can authorize or tell the Prez no more. That’s roughly the way the War Powers Act works.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-474869"><em>rumi @ 168</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>
  When did Congress authorize these airstrikes?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.swissinfo.org/eng/international/ticker/detail/U_S_confirms_second_air_strike_in_Somalia.html?siteSect=143&amp;sid=7461087&amp;cKey=1169689975000">U.S. confirms second air strike in Somalia</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>War Powers Act comes into play on this. Bush can do it all by his little lonesome on an emergency basis. All he has to do is notify Congress of the reasons in either sixty or ninety days (sorry, can’t remember at the moment which). At that point, Congress can authorize or tell the Prez no more. That’s roughly the way the War Powers Act works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rumi</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/25/and-in-other-news-2/#comment-474869</link>
		<dc:creator>rumi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 03:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/25/and-in-other-news-2/#comment-474869</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-474842&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;mui @ 167&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;rumi @ 119.&lt;a href=&quot;http://jones.house.gov/release.cfm?id=472&quot;&gt;Joint Resolution&lt;/a&gt;, introduced by a Representative Walter B. Jones (R-NC) via the Nation: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/blogs/notion?bid=15&amp;pid=158586&quot;&gt; No blank check.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  Oh, yeah, I support all of these resolutions but I don’t think BushCo will recognize them as legitimate. These guys have created laws, some with Congressional approval, to give them the power that these resolutions want to block.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;“Our constitution states that–while the Commander in Chief has the power to conduct wars–only Congress has the power to authorize war,”&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  When did Congress authorize these airstrikes?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.swissinfo.org/eng/international/ticker/detail/U_S_confirms_second_air_strike_in_Somalia.html?siteSect=143&amp;sid=7461087&amp;cKey=1169689975000&quot;&gt;U.S. confirms second air strike in Somalia&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-474842"><em>mui @ 167</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>rumi @ 119.<a href="http://jones.house.gov/release.cfm?id=472">Joint Resolution</a>, introduced by a Representative Walter B. Jones (R-NC) via the Nation: <a href="http://www.thenation.com/blogs/notion?bid=15&amp;pid=158586"> No blank check.</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>  Oh, yeah, I support all of these resolutions but I don’t think BushCo will recognize them as legitimate. These guys have created laws, some with Congressional approval, to give them the power that these resolutions want to block.</p>
<p><i>“Our constitution states that–while the Commander in Chief has the power to conduct wars–only Congress has the power to authorize war,”</i></p>
<p>  When did Congress authorize these airstrikes?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.swissinfo.org/eng/international/ticker/detail/U_S_confirms_second_air_strike_in_Somalia.html?siteSect=143&amp;sid=7461087&amp;cKey=1169689975000">U.S. confirms second air strike in Somalia</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
