<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Libby Liveblog: Robert Grenier Testimony, One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-testimony-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-testimony-one/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:01:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Strata-Sphere &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fitzgerald&#8217; Folly Part II</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-testimony-one/#comment-473186</link>
		<dc:creator>The Strata-Sphere &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fitzgerald&#8217; Folly Part II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-testimony-one/#comment-473186</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[…] Addendum: Some more interesting tidbits from the testimony of Grenier of the CIA. [Grenier] This person explained that in fact we, CIA, had sent Wilson to Niger to get info to determine whether or not Iraq attempted to purchase uranium. […]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Addendum: Some more interesting tidbits from the testimony of Grenier of the CIA. [Grenier] This person explained that in fact we, CIA, had sent Wilson to Niger to get info to determine whether or not Iraq attempted to purchase uranium. […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cinnamonape</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-testimony-one/#comment-472784</link>
		<dc:creator>cinnamonape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-testimony-one/#comment-472784</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-472296&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;bellesouth @ 31 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Second major point I made the people had verified that not only OVP, but also requests as well from State and Defense&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I took this to mean that the State and Defense depts. were interested in finding out about the trip as well as the OVP, too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, back in January 2002. But recall that throughout this whole affaire that the OVP has denied that they knew ANYTHING about Wilson’s trip, any summary of his debrief, and especially that they had expressed  to the CIA that they look deeper into reports of the rumors of the Niger “yellowcake” deals.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheney said that he had no clue about such a trip until Wilson’s leaks and editorial.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But here we have Grenier telling Libby that not only did OVP inquire about the Niger deals to the CIA, but so had State and Defense. So Libby knew that he couldn’t simply impugn Wilson by saying “release what you know about the mission” in it’s totality…he needed to get the CIA to spin it…by deleting the OVP from those that triggered the trip occurring…and shifting the trigger to State, the Pentagon and the CIA…in particular making it look like a “boondoggle” initiated by Plame.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Testimony by Harlow (the CIA Information Officer) and “Kathie” (Scooter’s Asst) will show exactly that the OVP was to be deleted from mention…wanna bet!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-472296"><em>bellesouth @ 31 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><blockquote>Second major point I made the people had verified that not only OVP, but also requests as well from State and Defense</p></blockquote>
<p>I took this to mean that the State and Defense depts. were interested in finding out about the trip as well as the OVP, too.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes, back in January 2002. But recall that throughout this whole affaire that the OVP has denied that they knew ANYTHING about Wilson’s trip, any summary of his debrief, and especially that they had expressed  to the CIA that they look deeper into reports of the rumors of the Niger “yellowcake” deals.</p>
<p>Cheney said that he had no clue about such a trip until Wilson’s leaks and editorial.</p>
<p>But here we have Grenier telling Libby that not only did OVP inquire about the Niger deals to the CIA, but so had State and Defense. So Libby knew that he couldn’t simply impugn Wilson by saying “release what you know about the mission” in it’s totality…he needed to get the CIA to spin it…by deleting the OVP from those that triggered the trip occurring…and shifting the trigger to State, the Pentagon and the CIA…in particular making it look like a “boondoggle” initiated by Plame.</p>
<p>Testimony by Harlow (the CIA Information Officer) and “Kathie” (Scooter’s Asst) will show exactly that the OVP was to be deleted from mention…wanna bet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Wilson</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-testimony-one/#comment-472761</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-testimony-one/#comment-472761</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-472352&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Phoenix Woman @ 39 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-472270&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;p.lukasiak @&lt;br /&gt;
                16              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;WoW hard to repute someone remembering getting a message from OVP for the first time. Those are the kind of things a person remembers. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;yeah, combine that with “I had never been pulled out of a meeting with DCI before”….and it makes Libby look &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; concerned with the entire subject of Joe Wilson early on….&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but this is the really damning part of the testimony so far….&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Second major point I made the people had verified that &lt;b&gt;not only OVP&lt;/b&gt;, but also requests as well from State and Defense. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here we have Grenier confirming that OVP WAS INVOLVED in getting Wilson sent — yet Libby (and the WH) went to great lengths to discredit Wilson by claiming OVP was NOT involved….&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DING DING DING!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lotsa time and energy spent on a lowly old diplomat who just happened to be married to the covert operative in charge of the CIA’s WMD-hunting network in Iraq.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lowly old diplomat??? Thanks a lot&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-472352"><em>Phoenix Woman @ 39 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-472270"><em>p.lukasiak @<br />
                16              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><i>WoW hard to repute someone remembering getting a message from OVP for the first time. Those are the kind of things a person remembers. </i></p>
<p>yeah, combine that with “I had never been pulled out of a meeting with DCI before”….and it makes Libby look <i>really</i> concerned with the entire subject of Joe Wilson early on….</p>
<p>but this is the really damning part of the testimony so far….</p>
<blockquote><p>Second major point I made the people had verified that <b>not only OVP</b>, but also requests as well from State and Defense. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Here we have Grenier confirming that OVP WAS INVOLVED in getting Wilson sent — yet Libby (and the WH) went to great lengths to discredit Wilson by claiming OVP was NOT involved….</p>
</blockquote>
<p>DING DING DING!</p>
<p>Lotsa time and energy spent on a lowly old diplomat who just happened to be married to the covert operative in charge of the CIA’s WMD-hunting network in Iraq.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Lowly old diplomat??? Thanks a lot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veritas78</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-testimony-one/#comment-472648</link>
		<dc:creator>Veritas78</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-testimony-one/#comment-472648</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That was damning. Nice, Fitz!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was damning. Nice, Fitz!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lederer</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-testimony-one/#comment-472638</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lederer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-testimony-one/#comment-472638</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You don’t get convictions with a witness who says:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;When you were first interviewed by FBI. Were you asked if you had discussed Wilson’s wife with Libby. I’m sure the topic came up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;My response was that I didn’t clearly remember.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I believe, thinking back that I probably had said I relayed this information to Libby. &lt;b&gt;But I couldn’t say for certain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In connection with your GJ testimony 2004, do you recall what you said what your memory was about saying about Wilson’s wife.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;I said I may have.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;particulalry when you are trying to prove that Libby not only got the info but had to remember the details of the conversation&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don’t get convictions with a witness who says:</p>
<blockquote><p>When you were first interviewed by FBI. Were you asked if you had discussed Wilson’s wife with Libby. I’m sure the topic came up.</p>
<p><b>My response was that I didn’t clearly remember.<br />
</b><br />
I believe, thinking back that I probably had said I relayed this information to Libby. <b>But I couldn’t say for certain.<br />
</b><br />
In connection with your GJ testimony 2004, do you recall what you said what your memory was about saying about Wilson’s wife.</p>
<p><b>I said I may have.<br />
</b>
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>particulalry when you are trying to prove that Libby not only got the info but had to remember the details of the conversation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daCascadian</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-testimony-one/#comment-472575</link>
		<dc:creator>daCascadian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-testimony-one/#comment-472575</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;stingray &gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
“…Seems wierd, because who really cares &lt;i&gt;how&lt;/i&gt; the trip came about? What does it have to do with how to rebut the accusation?”
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is all about “frat rat” bureaucratic games&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Yes, you did !”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“No, I didn`t !”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Yes, you did !”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“No, I didn`t !”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;etc…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rat fu*kin 8 year olds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact….Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth.” - &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:newshog@gmail.com&quot;&gt;newshog@gmail.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>stingray &gt;</p>
<blockquote><p>
“…Seems wierd, because who really cares <i>how</i> the trip came about? What does it have to do with how to rebut the accusation?”
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is all about “frat rat” bureaucratic games</p>
<p>“Yes, you did !”</p>
<p>“No, I didn`t !”</p>
<p>“Yes, you did !”</p>
<p>“No, I didn`t !”</p>
<p>etc…</p>
<p>Rat fu*kin 8 year olds</p>
<p>“Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact….Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth.” &#8211; <a href="mailto:newshog@gmail.com">newshog@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stingray</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-testimony-one/#comment-472387</link>
		<dc:creator>stingray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-testimony-one/#comment-472387</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;not only OVP, but also requests as well from State and Defense. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What was his response to hearing that State and Defense had also been interested.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Asked if CIA would be willing to release that publicly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why is Libby so keen for it to come out that it was not the OVP that led to the Wilson trip?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Was someone accusing the OVP of causing the whole mess, Wilson’s accustaion that the WH had lied in the SOTU? Was Bush’s office accusing Cheney’s office, and Cheny’s office was desperate to point the finger elsewhere? Seems wierd, because who really cares &lt;i&gt;how&lt;/i&gt; the trip came about? What does it have to do with how to rebut the accusation?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>not only OVP, but also requests as well from State and Defense. </i></p>
<p>What was his response to hearing that State and Defense had also been interested.</p>
<p>Asked if CIA would be willing to release that publicly.</p>
<p>Why is Libby so keen for it to come out that it was not the OVP that led to the Wilson trip?</p>
<p>Was someone accusing the OVP of causing the whole mess, Wilson’s accustaion that the WH had lied in the SOTU? Was Bush’s office accusing Cheney’s office, and Cheny’s office was desperate to point the finger elsewhere? Seems wierd, because who really cares <i>how</i> the trip came about? What does it have to do with how to rebut the accusation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat_AlexVA</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-testimony-one/#comment-472370</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat_AlexVA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-testimony-one/#comment-472370</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-472343&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Linda @ 38&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;“12:23 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What were you going to reveal?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We weren’t worried about revealing that Wilson went on the trip–he had outed himself.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He had “outed” himself?????????????????????&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What this means is - they weren’t worried about disclosing it was Wilson that went to Niger.  Joe Wilson disclosed it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But Grenier definately was having butterfly’s over “adding” that Mrs. Wilson worked in CPD to Libby.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-472343"><em>Linda @ 38</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>“12:23 </p>
<p>What were you going to reveal?</p>
<p>We weren’t worried about revealing that Wilson went on the trip–he had outed himself.”</p>
<p>He had “outed” himself?????????????????????</p>
</blockquote>
<p>What this means is &#8211; they weren’t worried about disclosing it was Wilson that went to Niger.  Joe Wilson disclosed it.</p>
<p>But Grenier definately was having butterfly’s over “adding” that Mrs. Wilson worked in CPD to Libby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twolf1</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-testimony-one/#comment-472363</link>
		<dc:creator>twolf1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-testimony-one/#comment-472363</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-two/&quot;&gt;New Thread, same great live blogging!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-two/">New Thread, same great live blogging!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenix Woman</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-testimony-one/#comment-472352</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix Woman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-robert-grenier-testimony-one/#comment-472352</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-472270&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;p.lukasiak @&lt;br /&gt;
                16              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;WoW hard to repute someone remembering getting a message from OVP for the first time. Those are the kind of things a person remembers. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;yeah, combine that with “I had never been pulled out of a meeting with DCI before”….and it makes Libby look &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; concerned with the entire subject of Joe Wilson early on….&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but this is the really damning part of the testimony so far….&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Second major point I made the people had verified that &lt;b&gt;not only OVP&lt;/b&gt;, but also requests as well from State and Defense. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here we have Grenier confirming that OVP WAS INVOLVED in getting Wilson sent — yet Libby (and the WH) went to great lengths to discredit Wilson by claiming OVP was NOT involved….&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DING DING DING!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lotsa time and energy spent on a lowly old diplomat who just happened to be married to the covert operative in charge of the CIA’s WMD-hunting network in Iraq.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-472270"><em>p.lukasiak @<br />
                16              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><i>WoW hard to repute someone remembering getting a message from OVP for the first time. Those are the kind of things a person remembers. </i></p>
<p>yeah, combine that with “I had never been pulled out of a meeting with DCI before”….and it makes Libby look <i>really</i> concerned with the entire subject of Joe Wilson early on….</p>
<p>but this is the really damning part of the testimony so far….</p>
<blockquote><p>Second major point I made the people had verified that <b>not only OVP</b>, but also requests as well from State and Defense. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Here we have Grenier confirming that OVP WAS INVOLVED in getting Wilson sent — yet Libby (and the WH) went to great lengths to discredit Wilson by claiming OVP was NOT involved….</p>
</blockquote>
<p>DING DING DING!</p>
<p>Lotsa time and energy spent on a lowly old diplomat who just happened to be married to the covert operative in charge of the CIA’s WMD-hunting network in Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
