<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Libby Liveblog: Wells&#8217; Opening Statement, Part Two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 00:00:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/#comment-470628</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 02:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/#comment-470628</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Now we know why the petulant boy king ribs Gregory so much and why Gregory does his pit bull thing every now and then.  NBC pundits/reporters/legal know that Libby, Cheney, Bush, Rove lied to the FBI, the grand jury and the public about the smear leak.  They also know that Libby’s defense is that NBC managers and employees are a bunch of misrecollecting (the defense’s term, not mine) idiots.  I really dont think ‘lil’ Rus is going have his professionalism impeached by Libby (unless of course advised not to by ‘Big’ Russ).  Not with Bush at 28% in CBS’ latest poll and Fitz laying out his cards on Cheney The Lying Fucking Bastard.     &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*xyz @ 108 and Sally&lt;br /&gt;
Tweety said it great the other day:  Who the hell misremembers something in detail that never happened to them?  And the misrembered details being exactly those used by someone trying to cover up their actions.  And as we know after today, there is evidence to show what a liar Libby is.    &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Telling you… NBC is in soo deep.  They sure are lucky that the public trusts Bush and Cheney less than they do the reporters that cover (or should we say (cover up) the Administrations’ actions.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now we know why the petulant boy king ribs Gregory so much and why Gregory does his pit bull thing every now and then.  NBC pundits/reporters/legal know that Libby, Cheney, Bush, Rove lied to the FBI, the grand jury and the public about the smear leak.  They also know that Libby’s defense is that NBC managers and employees are a bunch of misrecollecting (the defense’s term, not mine) idiots.  I really dont think ‘lil’ Rus is going have his professionalism impeached by Libby (unless of course advised not to by ‘Big’ Russ).  Not with Bush at 28% in CBS’ latest poll and Fitz laying out his cards on Cheney The Lying Fucking Bastard.     </p>
<p>*xyz @ 108 and Sally<br />
Tweety said it great the other day:  Who the hell misremembers something in detail that never happened to them?  And the misrembered details being exactly those used by someone trying to cover up their actions.  And as we know after today, there is evidence to show what a liar Libby is.    </p>
<p>Telling you… NBC is in soo deep.  They sure are lucky that the public trusts Bush and Cheney less than they do the reporters that cover (or should we say (cover up) the Administrations’ actions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kitchens</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/#comment-470496</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kitchens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/#comment-470496</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Aaah. Now I get it. It took me forever to get spurious’s joke. I guess he took me for a member of the MSM. Oh. (um, spurious, I do link my own blog in my comments. But I know that some things go by too fast to check out.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-469825&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;spurious @ 62&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, responding to my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/#comment-469771&quot;&gt;comment @ 17&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MSM?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This made it all the more puzzling.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Richmond @  66 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Spurious - yours is my best comment of the day!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ah well.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaah. Now I get it. It took me forever to get spurious’s joke. I guess he took me for a member of the MSM. Oh. (um, spurious, I do link my own blog in my comments. But I know that some things go by too fast to check out.)</p>
<blockquote><p>[<a href="#comment-469825"><em>spurious @ 62</em></a>, responding to my <a href="http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/#comment-469771">comment @ 17</a>]</p>
<p>MSM?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This made it all the more puzzling.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Richmond @  66 </em><br />
Spurious &#8211; yours is my best comment of the day!!!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ah well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cinnamonape</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/#comment-470482</link>
		<dc:creator>cinnamonape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/#comment-470482</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Cooper also says this about Rove after Rove mentioned “nonchalantly” that Wilson’s wife worked for the CIA on WMD’s.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“The notes, and my subsequent e-mails, go on to indicate that Rove told me MATERIAL WAS GOING TO BE DECLASSIFIED in the coming days that would cast doubt on Wilson’s mission and his findings….”Don’t get too far out ahead on Wilson…I’ve already said too much”.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So what material was the WH trying to get declassified? Plame’s employment with the CIA…which really was the only item that Rove revealed to Cooper that was clearly “off-limits”!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cooper also says this about Rove after Rove mentioned “nonchalantly” that Wilson’s wife worked for the CIA on WMD’s.</p>
<p>“The notes, and my subsequent e-mails, go on to indicate that Rove told me MATERIAL WAS GOING TO BE DECLASSIFIED in the coming days that would cast doubt on Wilson’s mission and his findings….”Don’t get too far out ahead on Wilson…I’ve already said too much”.</p>
<p>So what material was the WH trying to get declassified? Plame’s employment with the CIA…which really was the only item that Rove revealed to Cooper that was clearly “off-limits”!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rumi</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/#comment-470273</link>
		<dc:creator>rumi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/#comment-470273</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-470186&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Sparkles the Iguana @ 178&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-469826&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Tithonia @ 64 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Am I recalling correctly that most of these jurors are women? Will there be repercussions from repeatedly referring to Valerie Wilson as “the wife?” I understand that they’re trying to downplay her importance, but I know I certainly find it irritating when men refer to their own wives as “the wife”.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Agreed.  Annoying as hell.  Why doesn’t he just call her “the little lady” or “the ball and chain” and be done with it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  He might have another strategy in mind. Libby’s defense might include the confusion generated if/when the crucial information was listed in bits and pieces and sometimes obscure references. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For instance, Rove referred to her as “…Wilson’s wife is fair game” which I took to be a sign of Rove’s malicious intent.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-470186"><em>Sparkles the Iguana @ 178</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-469826"><em>Tithonia @ 64 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Am I recalling correctly that most of these jurors are women? Will there be repercussions from repeatedly referring to Valerie Wilson as “the wife?” I understand that they’re trying to downplay her importance, but I know I certainly find it irritating when men refer to their own wives as “the wife”.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Agreed.  Annoying as hell.  Why doesn’t he just call her “the little lady” or “the ball and chain” and be done with it.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>  He might have another strategy in mind. Libby’s defense might include the confusion generated if/when the crucial information was listed in bits and pieces and sometimes obscure references. </p>
<p>For instance, Rove referred to her as “…Wilson’s wife is fair game” which I took to be a sign of Rove’s malicious intent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sparkles the Iguana</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/#comment-470186</link>
		<dc:creator>Sparkles the Iguana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/#comment-470186</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-469826&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Tithonia @ 64 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Am I recalling correctly that most of these jurors are women? Will there be repercussions from repeatedly referring to Valerie Wilson as “the wife?” I understand that they’re trying to downplay her importance, but I know I certainly find it irritating when men refer to their own wives as “the wife”.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Agreed.  Annoying as hell.  Why doesn’t he just call her “the little lady” or “the ball and chain” and be done with it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-469826"><em>Tithonia @ 64 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Am I recalling correctly that most of these jurors are women? Will there be repercussions from repeatedly referring to Valerie Wilson as “the wife?” I understand that they’re trying to downplay her importance, but I know I certainly find it irritating when men refer to their own wives as “the wife”.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Agreed.  Annoying as hell.  Why doesn’t he just call her “the little lady” or “the ball and chain” and be done with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr_sol_man</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/#comment-470108</link>
		<dc:creator>mr_sol_man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/#comment-470108</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I just remembered a dream I had last night…..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I really think this would make a great cartoon but I can’t draw very well so if someone can, please do so and let me know.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Shrub (little bush) is standing at the pearly gates covered by a little leaf and looking sheepishly at St. Peter.&lt;br /&gt;
St peter tells him in a booming voice……&lt;br /&gt;
“Actually George I am the decider” he opens up the book of George’s life and starts to read the highlights&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HMMM….Let’s see here George…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lying seems to be one of your strong points… Check&lt;br /&gt;
Using God for your personal gain..Check&lt;br /&gt;
Responsible for at least 100,000 innocent deaths…..check&lt;br /&gt;
Peddling Fear for greed….Check&lt;br /&gt;
Copious drugs and drinking….Check&lt;br /&gt;
Blaming everyone but yourself….Check&lt;br /&gt;
Participating in smearing “the wife”…Check&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wow this list is one of the longest I’ve seen George and not one item on here is in your favor….I don’t think I need to see any more.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“And you thought it was hot in Texas when you were clearing brush….maybe that was the best thing you were doing to prepare you for the rest of your eternal life. At least you’ll enjoy it.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Next….&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hmmm… Dick you have an even darker side than George…I hope you enjoy clearing brush as much as George.  Good thing that void that was supposed to occupy your heart isn’t an issue in eternal damnation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Next…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can I call you Don….&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And soon the whole gang was clearing brush…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;JM&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just remembered a dream I had last night…..</p>
<p>I really think this would make a great cartoon but I can’t draw very well so if someone can, please do so and let me know.</p>
<p>Shrub (little bush) is standing at the pearly gates covered by a little leaf and looking sheepishly at St. Peter.<br />
St peter tells him in a booming voice……<br />
“Actually George I am the decider” he opens up the book of George’s life and starts to read the highlights</p>
<p>HMMM….Let’s see here George…</p>
<p>Lying seems to be one of your strong points… Check<br />
Using God for your personal gain..Check<br />
Responsible for at least 100,000 innocent deaths…..check<br />
Peddling Fear for greed….Check<br />
Copious drugs and drinking….Check<br />
Blaming everyone but yourself….Check<br />
Participating in smearing “the wife”…Check</p>
<p>Wow this list is one of the longest I’ve seen George and not one item on here is in your favor….I don’t think I need to see any more.</p>
<p>“And you thought it was hot in Texas when you were clearing brush….maybe that was the best thing you were doing to prepare you for the rest of your eternal life. At least you’ll enjoy it.”</p>
<p>Next….</p>
<p>Hmmm… Dick you have an even darker side than George…I hope you enjoy clearing brush as much as George.  Good thing that void that was supposed to occupy your heart isn’t an issue in eternal damnation.</p>
<p>Next…</p>
<p>Can I call you Don….</p>
<p>And soon the whole gang was clearing brush…</p>
<p>JM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patsy Stone</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/#comment-470101</link>
		<dc:creator>Patsy Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/#comment-470101</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-470002&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;EvilDrPuma @ 170 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-469917&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Patsy Stone @ 138&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is the WORST defense since OJ.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let’s hope this jury does a better job noticing that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’m wating for this from Wells:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Your Honor, having presented no credible line of reasoning, and having exausted the witness list, the defense wishes to punt.”  :)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-470002"><em>EvilDrPuma @ 170 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-469917"><em>Patsy Stone @ 138</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>This is the WORST defense since OJ.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Let’s hope this jury does a better job noticing that.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I’m wating for this from Wells:</p>
<p>“Your Honor, having presented no credible line of reasoning, and having exausted the witness list, the defense wishes to punt.”  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: demit</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/#comment-470060</link>
		<dc:creator>demit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/#comment-470060</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am looking forward to the SOTU tonight with an odd excitement. After yesterday’s 28% poll numbers, and today’s Fitz revelations and the major news coverage of them, I can’t wait to see what Little Boots’ demeanor will be. Will he still do that shoulder shruggy inappropriate smiles thing, or will he revert to the belligerent but whiny thing he does whenever the greatness of himself is not being properly acknowledged? Will he come up with a new -er name for himself? What will he do when he pauses for the clapping and there isn’t any?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Will the doctors have concocted the right combination of meds for him?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I will have one hand hovering over the mute button and one wrapped around a glass of something, but I will watch. This could be historic.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am looking forward to the SOTU tonight with an odd excitement. After yesterday’s 28% poll numbers, and today’s Fitz revelations and the major news coverage of them, I can’t wait to see what Little Boots’ demeanor will be. Will he still do that shoulder shruggy inappropriate smiles thing, or will he revert to the belligerent but whiny thing he does whenever the greatness of himself is not being properly acknowledged? Will he come up with a new -er name for himself? What will he do when he pauses for the clapping and there isn’t any?</p>
<p>Will the doctors have concocted the right combination of meds for him?</p>
<p>I will have one hand hovering over the mute button and one wrapped around a glass of something, but I will watch. This could be historic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shopgirlove</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/#comment-470034</link>
		<dc:creator>Shopgirlove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/#comment-470034</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Um, you guys? There’s a new thread!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, you guys? There’s a new thread!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adie</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/#comment-470030</link>
		<dc:creator>Adie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/libby-liveblog-wells-opening-statement-part-two/#comment-470030</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;hackworth at 172&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I can’t argue with a thing you’ve said.  I may very well mute &amp; put a paper bag over part of the screen.&lt;br /&gt;
Nancy Pelosi will be my focus - one of the best things to happen in Congress in a very very long time. ;-&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hackworth at 172</p>
<p>I can’t argue with a thing you’ve said.  I may very well mute &amp; put a paper bag over part of the screen.<br />
Nancy Pelosi will be my focus &#8211; one of the best things to happen in Congress in a very very long time. ;-&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.308 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 16:01:12 -->

