<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back At The House</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/back-at-the-house/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/back-at-the-house/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:40:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JoJoMojo</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/back-at-the-house/#comment-471893</link>
		<dc:creator>JoJoMojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/back-at-the-house/#comment-471893</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-470419&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;katymine @&lt;br /&gt;
                103              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just a nitpicky thing but Marcy the gum chewing was distracting during the PoliticsTV video. You both are GREAT and very credible and would hate to have that one little thing distract from the super coverage of the trial.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have to agree on this point. Chewing and less-than-polished dialog appeared like a half-hearted attempt and unfortunately undermines the assumption that bloggers can find a voice in other media. I do hope that they continue since their content was worth future efforts to refine presentation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-470419"><em>katymine @<br />
                103              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Just a nitpicky thing but Marcy the gum chewing was distracting during the PoliticsTV video. You both are GREAT and very credible and would hate to have that one little thing distract from the super coverage of the trial.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I have to agree on this point. Chewing and less-than-polished dialog appeared like a half-hearted attempt and unfortunately undermines the assumption that bloggers can find a voice in other media. I do hope that they continue since their content was worth future efforts to refine presentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanie</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/back-at-the-house/#comment-471815</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 07:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/back-at-the-house/#comment-471815</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-470378&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Peterr @ 65 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-470375&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Everythingseemssoneat @ 62&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;What does *g* mean?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*g* - grins&lt;br /&gt;
*G* - big ol’ grins&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oh, shoot.  I thought you guys were a giggly bunch!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-470378"><em>Peterr @ 65 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-470375"><em>Everythingseemssoneat @ 62</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>What does *g* mean?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>*g* &#8211; grins<br />
*G* &#8211; big ol’ grins</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Oh, shoot.  I thought you guys were a giggly bunch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Filibuster</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/back-at-the-house/#comment-471772</link>
		<dc:creator>The Filibuster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 06:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/back-at-the-house/#comment-471772</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;……and we’ll see you tomorrow….BEEP.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>……and we’ll see you tomorrow….BEEP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twc</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/back-at-the-house/#comment-471758</link>
		<dc:creator>twc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 05:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/back-at-the-house/#comment-471758</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Terrific stuff.  Many, many thanks to you all — and to the Wilsons, as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrific stuff.  Many, many thanks to you all — and to the Wilsons, as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie Pool</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/back-at-the-house/#comment-471666</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Pool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 04:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/back-at-the-house/#comment-471666</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;… Oh, I don’t mean to insinuate that I want Libby pardoned. It’s just that I’ll breathe a whole lot easier once I know a presidential pardon aint gonna happen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>… Oh, I don’t mean to insinuate that I want Libby pardoned. It’s just that I’ll breathe a whole lot easier once I know a presidential pardon aint gonna happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: talesof twokitties</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/back-at-the-house/#comment-471649</link>
		<dc:creator>talesof twokitties</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 04:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/back-at-the-house/#comment-471649</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;former teacher says:  gum = not good.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;otherwise, job well done!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>former teacher says:  gum = not good.</p>
<p>otherwise, job well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie Pool</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/back-at-the-house/#comment-471549</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Pool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 04:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/back-at-the-house/#comment-471549</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-470367&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Blub @ 54 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;All this makes me very suspicious when you evaluate this in that series of meetings between Turdy and Fitz. I’m wondering if we aren’t seeing the barest outline of a deal that may or may not be in the works somewhere…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-470353&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;James Robinson @ 42 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IMHO I think Fitz made a secret deal with Bush that he would not indict Rove:&lt;br /&gt;
1) If Bush agrees not to pardon Libby before, during, or after the trial even if he’s convicted.&lt;br /&gt;
2) Rove waives the statutes of limitations (for his alleged crimes).&lt;br /&gt;
3) And that the Bush administration (— especially Cheney’s office) cooperates fully throughout the trial.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bush has literally gotten away with murder (… well, actually he still is) so why didn’t he just pardon Libby a long time ago — or why not now for that matter? The trial is far more damaging to Bush than pardoning Rove. In fact, we’ve always assumed that that’s what would happen and now we’re left to wonder what’s taking Bush so long. — Rove must be the catalyst that has imperiled Libby’s chances for a presidential pardon. Maybe this point has already been made. — But please tell me where because I need someone to validate my feelings…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-470367"><em>Blub @ 54 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>All this makes me very suspicious when you evaluate this in that series of meetings between Turdy and Fitz. I’m wondering if we aren’t seeing the barest outline of a deal that may or may not be in the works somewhere…</p>
<p><a href="#comment-470353"><em>James Robinson @ 42 </em></a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>IMHO I think Fitz made a secret deal with Bush that he would not indict Rove:<br />
1) If Bush agrees not to pardon Libby before, during, or after the trial even if he’s convicted.<br />
2) Rove waives the statutes of limitations (for his alleged crimes).<br />
3) And that the Bush administration (— especially Cheney’s office) cooperates fully throughout the trial.</p>
<p>Bush has literally gotten away with murder (… well, actually he still is) so why didn’t he just pardon Libby a long time ago — or why not now for that matter? The trial is far more damaging to Bush than pardoning Rove. In fact, we’ve always assumed that that’s what would happen and now we’re left to wonder what’s taking Bush so long. — Rove must be the catalyst that has imperiled Libby’s chances for a presidential pardon. Maybe this point has already been made. — But please tell me where because I need someone to validate my feelings…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cajun</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/back-at-the-house/#comment-471352</link>
		<dc:creator>cajun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 03:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/back-at-the-house/#comment-471352</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Marcie,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lose the gum. Ya can’t be a big star TV anchor if yer chomping on a wad of gum.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcie,</p>
<p>Lose the gum. Ya can’t be a big star TV anchor if yer chomping on a wad of gum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adie</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/back-at-the-house/#comment-471310</link>
		<dc:creator>Adie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 03:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/back-at-the-house/#comment-471310</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Christy, Marcy, Pach&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You guys are incredible!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Marcy, I do believe FDL owes you a lifetime supply of your favorite gum, eh?  works for me ;-&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sleep well tonight guys.  Stay safe in the big city.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I believe I heard Tweety say something today akin to “Blogging, HardBlog!  HardBlog!  That’s so-o-o kewl!!!”  i’m thinkin’ it’s a good thing KO is holdin’ his hand when he crosses the street, till this trial’s over.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christy, Marcy, Pach</p>
<p>You guys are incredible!</p>
<p>Marcy, I do believe FDL owes you a lifetime supply of your favorite gum, eh?  works for me ;-&gt;</p>
<p>Sleep well tonight guys.  Stay safe in the big city.</p>
<p>I believe I heard Tweety say something today akin to “Blogging, HardBlog!  HardBlog!  That’s so-o-o kewl!!!”  i’m thinkin’ it’s a good thing KO is holdin’ his hand when he crosses the street, till this trial’s over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adie</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/back-at-the-house/#comment-471266</link>
		<dc:creator>Adie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 03:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/23/back-at-the-house/#comment-471266</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;GrandmaJ&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OMG!  I forgot all about your tests.  Hope all turns out perfect for you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Did you get that steak like you promised? ;-&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GrandmaJ</p>
<p>OMG!  I forgot all about your tests.  Hope all turns out perfect for you.</p>
<p>Did you get that steak like you promised? ;-&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
