
You've no doubt heard that Scooter Libby will be arguing he was so busy with very important events during 2003 and 2004 that he just plum forgot that Dick Cheney--and not Tim Russert--told him of Valerie Plame's identity. He's even preparing a PowerPoint presentation to show you which very important events he was busy with on which day.
Let me be clear. Scooter Libby is not arguing he was busy with very important things and therefore he didn't have time to obsess over Joe Wilson. He has admitted to discussing how to respond to Wilson repeatedly, as in this passage from the grand jury testimony where he describes discussing the Wilson column multiple times a day activity:
Q. And was [the article] a discussion of -- that was -- was it a topic that was discussed on a daily basis?
A. Yes sir.
Q. And it was discussed on multiple occasions each day in fact?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. And during this time did the Vice-President indicate that he was upset that this article was out there which falsely in his view attacked his own credibility?
By his own admission, the Vice President's Chief of Staff and National Security Adviser, and the President's Assistant spent time during a week full of very important things discussing an op-ed a private citizen had written for the New York Times. As a taxpayer, I read this and begin to sympathize with supervisors who discipline employees for spending too much time surfing the net, rather than doing their job. Only in this case, the guy distracted from doing his job is one of the top security officials tasked with keeping this country safe. And the things he was supposed to be doing--instead of plotting a response to a private citizen--turn out to include a large number of very important things at which this Administration has failed miserably. Take a look at the list of very important events Libby will present in his PowerPoint:
- Threatened attacks on America and American interests by Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, and other terrorist groups
- Enhancing the US defenses for homeland security
- Nuclear proliferation by Pakistani scientist A. Q. Khan and efforts by the US to stop his activities
- The development of nuclear weapons by North Korea
- Iran's development of nuclear weapons, its arrest and potential harboring of Al Qaeda members, and its involvement in Iraq
- The proper size and role of the Iraqi military and security forces in the months following the fall of Saddam Hussein and the proper composition of the governing entity in Iraq
- The Israeli-Palestinian relationship, including the emergence of Mahumoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) as an alternative to Yasser Arafat and the threat Hamas posed to peace and security
- A tense diplomatic crisis arising during the first half of July 2003 from the arrest of Turkish soldiers by US forces
- The unrest in Liberia in June and July 2003, culminating in the fall of Charles Taylor in early 2003; the danger to the US Embassy and its occupants in Monrovia; and the United States' role in protecting civilians caught in the strife
Let's see. The Turkish soldiers were released on July 8, 2003. And Liberia remains tense--but peaceful, as its former dictator prepares to face a UN War Crimes tribunal. I'd call those successes. But the rest of these very important things Scooter Libby was supposed to be working on while he was having multiple discussions a day to orchestrate a Wilson smear? Let's look more closely.
Threatened attacks on America and American interests by Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, and other terrorist groups
My first question about Libby's focus on fighting terrorism is why Libby was spending so much time fighting this guy , when this guy is still at large?
On top of that, we have this update from those who have to pick up after Libby's mess.
Intel director John Negroponte gave Congress a sobering assessment last week of the continued threats from groups like Al Qaeda and Hizbullah. But even gloomier comments came from Henry Crumpton, the outgoing State Department terror coordinator. An ex-CIA operative, Crumpton told NEWSWEEK that a worldwide surge in Islamic radicalism has worsened recently, increasing the number of potential terrorists and setting back U.S. efforts in the terror war. "Certainly, we haven't made any progress," said Crumpton. "In fact, we've lost ground."
While we can't blame the ongoing decline on Libby--who has been out of his job for a year and a half--we sure don't seem to have eliminated the threat.
Enhancing the US defenses for homeland security
Things are even worse with our homeland security. Only last week did the US House pass a bill doing some of the obvious things to keep our nation safe--like inspecting shipping containers and addressing the communications needs of first responders. Those seem like no-brainers to me--but I guess our executive branch has been too busy planning campaigns against its private citizens to enact even these obvious reforms.
Nuclear proliferation by Pakistani scientist A. Q. Khan and efforts by the US to stop his activities
Libby will almost certainly describe this as one of the issues that distracted him when he was testifying in fall 2003 and spring 2004. AQ Khan's role in selling nukes to, among others, Iran was revealed in fall 2003, just as Libby was gearing up to allegedly lie the first time, and Khan was "arrested" in February 2004, a month before Libby allegedly lied a second time. Of course the "arrest" was just a pardon and house arrest. Since that time, the US has never been able to speak with Khan directly. And most of Khan's associates have since been let go. And Pakistan--which by all accounts was intimately involved in Khan's proliferation network--has been upgrading it's own program.
The biggest irony, of course, is that Scooter Libby was so distracted with his plan to respond to Wilson that he didn't even notice that the wife about whom he was spreading leaks was one of the key Americans trying to stop this kind of proliferation. Plame can no longer combat proliferation, and the efforts of Scooter and his buddies appear to have been too ineffective to do so.
The development of nuclear weapons by North Korea
One of Pakistan's best customers, of course, was North Korea. And as we now know, Libby's efforts to prevent North Korea from going nuclear failed. While North Korea's recent test was largely a dud, the Administration's failure to sustain 6-party talks (or better, to engage in honest bilateral talks) has simply given North Korea more time to develop its program. Chief among our problems throughout this period was the involvement of Dick Cheney's handpicked "envoy," John Bolton, who has scuttled attempts at diplomacy at every step of the way, behaving so undiplomatically that he got banned from talks. In this case, then, OVP sinned as much by commission as omission and distraction. Given the way OVP's involvement in North Korea seemed a constant setback to progress with North Korea, you might imagine that Libby's distraction with Wilson would have helped us prevent North Korea from going nuclear. But whether through omission or commission, Libby's efforts failed.
Iran's development of nuclear weapons, its arrest and potential harboring of Al Qaeda members, and its involvement in Iraq
To a degree, this is an absurd proposition on its face. One of the chief liaisons between Iran and Iraq, in the early days, was none other than Ahmed Chalabi, whose intelligence chief was passing our secrets to Iran. So it's not like the guys pushing Chalabi to be the central power broker in Iraq were really working against Iranian influence.
But if we were to take Libby's claims at their face value--that he was busy trying to get Iran to hand over Al Qaeda leaders it had in captivity and to end its nuclear program--then we can only judge his efforts to be a complete failure. As Flynt Leverett has explained, the Bush Administration squandered the best opportunity to negotiate these issues during precisely the period when Libby was hatching his plot against Joe Wilson.
On the nuclear issue, the administration refused to consider direct negotiations with Tehran for nearly four years after the revelations of Iran’s efforts to develop a uranium enrichment capability. In the spring of 2003, the Iranian Foreign Ministry sent, via Swiss diplomatic channels, a proposal for negotiations aimed at resolving all outstanding bilateral differences between Tehran and Washington, including the nuclear issue. The proposal was described as having been endorsed by all the major power centers in Iran, including the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The administration’s response was to complain to the Swiss Foreign Ministry that the Swiss ambassador in Tehran had exceeded his brief by passing such a paper. It is worth noting that the Iranian message came to Washington shortly after the conclusion of major combat operations in Iraq and well before the emergence of the insurgency there—in other words, the Iranian offer was extended at a time when U.S. standing in the region appeared to be at its height. It is also worth recalling that, when the Iranian offer was made, the Islamic Republic was not spinning centrifuges or enriching uranium and the reformist Mohammad Khatami was still president. [my emphasis]
Not only was BushCo going after Joe Wilson, I guess, but they were going after the Swiss at the same time. Perhaps that explains Libby's confusion and forgetfulness.
The proper size and role of the Iraqi military and security forces in the months following the fall of Saddam Hussein and the proper composition of the governing entity in Iraq
Wow. How can I treat this fairly? I'll just let George Bush assess how well Iraq is going.
The situation in Iraq is unacceptable to the American people -- and it is unacceptable to me. Our troops in Iraq have fought bravely. They have done everything we have asked them to do. Where mistakes have been made, the responsibility rests with me.
I guess Bush doesn't judge the results of Libby's very important work that highly. I'll chalk that up to one more failure during the period Libby was busy obsessing about Joe Wilson.
The Israeli-Palestinian relationship, including the emergence of Mahumoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) as an alternative to Yasser Arafat and the threat Hamas posed to peace and security
By the reference to Abbas, I presume Libby's team is referring to Abbas' ill-fated service as Prime Minister from March 2003 until fall 2003. You know--the one that ended when Abbas resigned (among other reasons) because he didn't get enough support from Israel and the US.
The fundamental problem, the statement said, was "Israel's unwillingness to implement its road map commitments and to undertake any constructive measures."
He also said the United States and the international community "did not exert sufficient influence on Israel to implement its commitments in the road map to push the peace process forward or to end its military escalation."
Can I just call that another Libby failure and leave it at that?
Libby may think the exercise of describing all the very important things he was working on may get him off perjury and obstruction charges. But as a taxpayer, I can't say I'm all that sympathetic. Libby worked for me and you, overseeing all these very important things. And instead of giving them his full attention, he was busy plotting up a smear of a private citizen. Perhaps if he hadn't been so obsessed with Joe Wilson, he might have succeeded with more than two of these important security issues.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Fitz!
OT– Mondale and Carter on the Sit Room and doing very heavy lifting!
FITZ and JANE!
{{{{{Jane!}}}}}
angie - thought you would be interested in this
Right. And if I go down to the local store and boost a candy bar and get caught, I can tell the judge I had so many other more important things clouding my brain, I just forgot to pay for it. I can scream that all the way to the jail house. That might wash in Libby-Rove-Bush and Cheney world. But I can promise that will not work in kiddo world.
twolf1 @ 3
Thank you, twolf1 and I most certainly am very interested!
:>)
hey, empty wheel, I sure hope fitz reads your stuff, and don’t say “he’s probably considered everything you’ve considered”.
I know as a fact the very best miss things people outside the box see
I’ll give an example;
I once had the pleasure of discussing memory management with the very person who wrote the code for microsoft (Landy Wang )
in that discussion I mentioned an affect a user might experience if they changed a particular setting Landy told me the affect wouldn’t take place, when I told him the scenario it would, he agreed with my assessment
I was shocked, told him I never expected to igve insight on memory management to Landy Wang of microsoft, he said nobody else ever had
I do believe fitz could would have a ball readking your stuff and might well take something from you he hadn’t considered
kudos to you
would a moderator tell me what it is in my post at number seven that triggered the filter here?
I can’t figure it out
[Mod Note; sometimes the filters work in strange and mystery ways. There’s no obvious trigger in your comment.]
Bullseye, as per usual, emptywheel. I can’t figure out why the borrow and spend Republicans haven’t figured this out yet.
“I can’t recall.” “I have no specific recollection.” Weren’t those John Poindexter’s repeated excuses during the Iran-Contra hearings?
It wasn’t convincing then, either.
Deja vu all over again.
John Casper @ 9
let’s add an addendum to the “borrow and soend republican” handle
from now on I believe we should use;
“borrow, spend, steal” republicans
whatcha think?
Worthy of extensive spotlighting.
I just hope this Libby trial leads to Cheney. If that happens; who knows where else it will go?
Oklahoma kiddo @ 13
no place to go but up
I thought it was interesting that John Dickerson reported at Slate on the cleaning lady who worked at the Watergate and knew Condi lived on the 5th floor, and was dismissed by Walton because her employer wouldn’t pay her if she got onto the jury. Libby’s lawyers were trying to get her axed after “she seemed to suggest that since the defendant was indicted, he was already guilty. But as she walked out of the courtroom, she looked at Libby and whispered, ‘good luck.’”
OT - CNN - Bill Richardson plans to announce Sunday that he will be running
Peter Gabriel - “I Don’t Remember“:
More reporting by John Dickerson:
twolf1 @ 15
Don’t these people have anything better to do? Evidently not.
Emptywheel –
Boy, when you set about doing demolition work on Scooty-Scoot’s main “defense” for lying through his teeth on multiple occasions to multiple entities, you don’t fool around!
In fact not only do you leave no stone standing, you’ve salted the ground completely.
My hat’s off to you! (Again!)
It’s all so exasperating. Does anyone have any idea how long this Libby thing can drag out, until a final resolution? Are we talking years perhaps?
And more Dickerson:
These dudes sound like the most annoying pricks.
twolf1 @ 14
Actually, that would be down:
“FOX NEWS POLL: AMERICANS DISLIKE BUSH MORE THAN CHENEY…”
Oklahoma kiddo @
5
Indeed, ‘I forgot’.
‘Two simple words in the English language. How many times do we let ourselves get into terrible situations because we don’t say “I forgot”?’
;>)
Sparkles the Iguana @ 15
Of course it’s possible her whispered wish was something more along the lines of “rotsa ruck, pal!”
I know there’s been speculation that cheney is going to testify in person
if true, why the change?
because cheney thinks he can be convincing in person that’s why
he has that much confidence in himself, he thinks he will intimidate, embarrass fitz, force fitz to defer to him, and he thinks he can put him in his place
cheney can be made to loose control, and quite easily, we’ve seen him curse out a sitting senator and he is not capable of prolonged self control
he also believes we are all morons, we know this because we’ve seen him get on the TEE vee and repeat to us as fact data we know with no doubt is false…he believes by virtue of his won declaration he can make us believe whatever he has to say.
man, what I would pay to see teh fitzster get cheney to loose control
Mrs. K8 @ 20
Thanks, Mrs. K8.
We’ve got abotu three weeks to turn the Memory Defense on its head–if for no other reason than to make it harder for Bush to pardon Libby.
Bob Cesca: Bush still giddy over death & destruction in the Middle East but gets downright grim at the mention of tax cuts.
Gee, accountability and takng responsibility for one’s actions. What a novel concept. *g*
GREAT post, EW!
Oklahoma kiddo @ 21
There’s one consolation here — all along the way there will be a constant reminder, in every headline, of what Cheney’s gang does best: LYING.
Excellent work, Emptywheel. I’d like to point out that if you have confidence in yourself, you don’t worry about what they’re saying on the NY Times Op Ed page.
Retaliation shows lack of confidence. Vindictiveness is weakness. The psychological profile on Dick Cheney confirms the cowardice he showed with the 5 deferrments long ago.
He can’t take the heat…and, yet, he occupies one of the most powerful positions in the world. How did this happen?
The biggest irony, of course, is that Scooter Libby was so distracted with his plan to respond to Wilson that he didn’t even notice that the wife about whom he was spreading leaks was one of the key Americans trying to stop this kind of proliferation. Plame can no longer combat proliferation, and the efforts of Scooter and his buddies appear to have been too ineffective to do so.
Lukery has been on this since day one - shutting down Brewster-Jennings (Plame’s pseudo-employer) was no accident. BJ was actively working on stopping proliferation, to Iran, of weapons of the type that Mr. Khan had to offer.
I don’t understand it all - Luke does - but for some reaosn Turkey always comes up….
ASparkles the Iguana @ 15
That little snippet is worthless unless we also know the tone of voice.
mc @ 23
Oh look, John Dickerson finds Fitz very humorless:
perris @ 26
Fitzy got a lot of practice with the mob bosses.
oxide @ 36
nobody here believes cheney stands a chance against fitz, but cheney believes fitz doesn’t stand a chance against him
OT - CNN cafferty 5:00 question: Why would the Bush administration suddenly fire a bunch of federal prosecutors?
respond here
Here’s a question: when Cheney is on the stand, does Fitz address him as “Mr. Cheney” or as “Mr. Vice President?”
Sparkles the Iguana @ 35
Fitz must be a p*ker player. I, for one, would not want to be sitting across from him.
In any venue.
[Mod Note; comment edited]
OT: Joe Loserman on NPR. Whiny little bitch.
Sparkles the Iguana @ 35
Good for him. He thinks this is serious.
Marcy, great analysis, as always. Your research skills are awesome. I’m just glad he was distracted. Think of the damage Libby could have done if the Very Important Things had his full attention.
I would absolutely LOVE to see Cheney lose it on the stand. Who knows, it might turn into one of those Jack Nicholson moments from A FEW GOOD MEN. “You’re goddamn right I ordered the CODE RED!!”
Wheee!!!!
EW - Forgive my liberties with a typo:
zeppo @ 42
I expect him to loose control
I give one chance that he doesn’t;
if he realizes he is no match for fitz and gets professional help and practice at getting grilled
then he’ll be ready for whatever fitz throws at him.
however, if cheney is the man I believe he is, he thinks he can handle “a whimp like the prosecutor”
however because I think by now cheney realizes his limitations he will get some training for the cross
Pachacutec @ 39
Dick.
With a sneer in his mouth.
And then he ducks.
emptywheel @ 27
You know, this all just reminded me of a local case — the conviction of Arizona’s slimy governor, J. Fife Symington III (sounds like a made-up name for a sitcom, doesn’t it?).
He managed to lie to multiple financial entities (primarily banks) about his financial status.
It seems that when he wanted to borrow money, he inflated his net worth. But when he wanted slack on his massive loan payments, he underestimated his assets.
He said it was oops! a problem of memory and math!.
He was convicted for bank fraud. Why? Because oddly enough, all his multiple “mistakes” always, always, always turned out to be in HIS favor.
[The conviction was eventually overturned because of a technicality — a juror who (irrationally or in bad faith, IMO) insisted on his innocence no matter how much evidence of his ever-so-convenient shenanigans was placed in front of her was dismissed by the judge at the request of the prosecution to prevent a hung jury. This came back to bite prosecutors in the butt on appeal — his conviction was tossed.]
Anyway, my point is that it seems that Libby’s memory problems always seem to end up favoring himself and the office of the Veep, don’t they? They never seem to place anyone in the administration in a bad light.
Odd how that works out, isn’t it?
Pachacutec @ 37
I don’t know, but the transcripts of the George Ryan trial would indicate what Fitz’s AUSA’s called Ryan.
emptywheel @ 44
Ha.
Will Cheney be allowed to testify sitting on a hay bale to suggest he is one of the people?
I have a mental picture of Scooter using a Franklin Day Planner with the running list cited in your post, Marcy; each morning, hunched over his planner, he’d prioritize his daily To Do List.
And next to each one of these items is a little arrow pointing right instead of a check mark, indicating this was something to be continued at some point in the future but not actually dealt with now.
And a check mark next to Wilson sometime in July…
Seriously, if his planner looked anything remotely like a running list of line items from day-to-day, he’s busted. No memory defense.
jayt — I’m with lukery. If they wanted to discredit Wilson, it would have been cleaner, easier, more direct to simply find a way to minimize him in the media; they could have done what they did to the NYT on NSA domestic wiretapping and asked them to sit on the story for reasons of national security. Or some other similarly manipulative method; it’s not like they didn’t have a veritable lock on the media. Going after Plame was to go after a much wider target.
neokneme @ 44
Thanks! Fixed, I think.
zeppo @ 42
After thinking about it for a day or two - I find myself believing lhp’s theory; more lor less.
Cheny’s being on the witness lis may in fact be a total red herring - existing only as a means of sorting out potetntial jurors that the defense doesn’t like. He may never show up at all. Just because his name is on the witness list does not, by any means, mean that he will in fact be called.
I mean - if I’m Cheney - why would I even consider showing up? At best he’s a lay memory witness. Not worth a whole lot. If he does show up - he’s got the Wilson op-ed, with his own hand-written notes on it, to answer for.
Why in the world would he do that?
Rayne @ 50
LOL
We may be able to play with this at trial. After all, he’s going toget up there and say he was very concerned about North Korea–and we gte to explain how Bolton–Cheney’s picked NK guy–basically got kicked out of the country. And the Abbas thing. How hard is it, really, to try to support the guy you’re investing all your hopes for peace on?
jayt @ 32
Turkey….Turkey?
Why, I think I hear the voice of Sibel Edmonds whispering “yes! yes! yes!” in the background. Too bad that’s all she can spit out while struggling to pull off that gag on her mouth.
I can’t wait for Marcy’s live blogging next week!
jayt @ 52
I dunno…. Cheney at times seems to be something other than a human. Do you think he has any personal loyalty to Scoots? He would certainly be between a rock and a hard place in terms of trying to help out his loyal assistant and not screwing up and saying something that makes the entire situation worse. I mean, he could probably get Libby off very easily, but at what personal cost to him and the Bush adminstration?
It will be interesting, no matter what happens.
Now, where the hell did I put those press passes?
They must be around here somewhere. I know I had them. . .
mc @ 40
Gee, I would. If it were a little bistro table, with a nice bottle of Cote du Rhone and two glasses between us.
Heh. I think if he ends up on the stand, Cheney will definitely go Colonel Jessup.
Because he doesn’t give a damn what we think we’re entitled to.
Oh please, oh please, oh please, go Jessup on us.
jayt @ 52
I agree they’re using his appearance to greatest advantage. But I think they also need him to rebut Cathie Martin.
Pachacutec @ 57
I hope you’re kidding!!!
Ol Cheney will get up there and assume his trademark hunched position and then start in with his monotone;
‘Well of course Mr. Libby was a very busy man…’
zeppo @ 43
“Dick” Nicholson?
zeppo says
January 19th, 2007 at 2:26 pm*
I mean, he could probably get Libby off very easily,
For now - I’ll just respectfully disagree.
Cheney brings nothing to this party.
Oh Marcy, he’s messing with you. He knows he’d have Jane’s pink-papered back end arriving inside 12 hours if he didn’t have them. ;-)
K8 @ 46. Yeah, I remember Fife’s deal here in Phx too. These type sure forget a lot.
The pompousness of Lieberman reminds of the arrogance of Senator Clinton. Each thinks they can maintain their posture and we Demos have nowhere to run. I could get f’ing pissed about this.
Mrs. K8 @ 53
Noam Chomsky wrote that the US, Turkey and Israel are the real axis of evil.
emptywheel @ 59
I think I can find them. Don’t worry, at least. . . not yet.
Cheney is huddled with the image consultants as we speak, trying to get the sneer wiped off his face. Sadly, his mother’s warning has come true: “Do that often enough and your face is going to freeze that way.”
jayt @ 63
Yeah, you’re right. I didn’t think that one through. Even if Cheney said something like “Yes, I told Libby to leak Plame’s name and then told him to lie about it on the stand”, that still doesn’t do anything about Libby lying under oath, even if he was under orders.
Just being a good German soldier, ja?
I should slow down and think about what I am posting with so many people who actually know what they are talking about here….
hackworth @ 68
Where did Mr. Chomsky write this?
O/T and a “drive by” blogger are having server problems so don’t be surprised if you can’t get to a lot of blogs.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 65
I agree. Their sense of self importance jibes poorly with a job title that contains the word representative.
Why was Libby the forward man supposedly dealing with this “important” stuff? Why was it his overwhelming responsibility, triggering the “I was busy” defense? Shouldn’t there have been more senior people working directly for the President whose job these items entailed? Weren’t there NSA’s who would outrank Scooter? Geez.
Hey folks a Minor/Major complaint: Can we have some ground rules here?
HIS NAME IS IRVING.
“SCOOTER” IS A NICKNAME CONFECTED TO COVER UP THE FACT THAT HIS REAL NAME IS IRVING.
LET US IN FUTURE REFER TO HIM BY HIS REAL NAME
Mark at 72 — Great to see your phosphors. :)
up next on hardballs - the Libby trial
OK @ 70 I’ll look it up and get back with you. Absolutely certain of it I am. Was a great read.
Hayduke @ 65
But they never ever forget anything which would be to their DISadvantage to forget.
This is a pathological cognitive syndrome in search of a name. Neurologists should focus some attention on it, eh? Or maybe the shrinks have named it already — “pathological lying.”
OT –
So, you’re in the Valley of the Sun, too? (Did I know that already, and forgot it? A memory problem?) Not much sun today, dark and damp and dreary. I like it, actually. When we first moved here we thought the blue sky was great. At first. “Hey, let’s go outside and frolic! The weather is great!” After the umpteenth straight cloudless blue sky day, it was more like, “Ho hum. Another sunny day. Big deal.” We can’t shake our back-home preference for variable weather.
zeppo says
January 19th, 2007 at 2:36 pm*
I should slow down and think about what I am posting with so many people who actually know what they are talking about here….
Once again, I’ll respectfully disagree.
Batting ideas around is not only a bit of fun, but is almost always useful - and fer chrissakes, please don’t mistake me for someone who knows a whole heck of a lot….
I just toss stuff out - I’m a conversation starter, kind of…
Glorfindel @ 74
Libby was pretty fucking senior. HIs three titles were VP Chief of Staff, VP’s National Security Advisor, and President’s Assistant. That made him at least equal to Hadley, and when you consider how much more powerful Cheney was than Condi back then, it becomes clear why he was working on all this stuff.
Thanks for the post here, EW–I follow you or go to you on thenexthurrah from here daily. Interesting stuff you have up, as always.
Thanks also to the fdl community, as we enter even more interesting times and will our best karma (if there be such a thing) to Jane.
G.O. dubya
Somewhere in the bowels of the…
:~}
Mark! Good to see you!
Emptywheel, CHS, Para, et al.
1. IMHO, and the opinion of trial lawyers I know and work with, Powerpoints don’t help individuals trying to put their case in. It seems jurors get the feeling you’re just a bit too slick. But, that’s an opinion call…
But, this is not an opinion call:
2. Shouldn’t we, when addressing his alleged memory problem, be backing up from the grass to look at the pattern being mowed in the outfield (pitchers and catchers in 20 some days): Scooter was the assistant to the Vice President. The Vice President, by law, doesn’t really have that many responsibilities - everything Deadeye was doing was surplusage to his office, or overflow from the limited vessel down the hall in the Oval Office. I recognize Scooter was technically a Special Assistant to the President seconded to the Vice President, but still, what does it say when the Office of the President is so overwhelmed that he has to farm out work to the Vice President (whose traditional role is being the President’s political heavy, anyway)? Or that the President is so incompetent he has to pull other incompetents (viz. the series of fiascoes you listed) into his circle?
There’s a fundamental logical disconnect in the whole Idea that a Vice President is a major player in the whole foreign affairs arena - that didn’t really start until Reagan made Poppy his right-hand guy for “crisis management”, though Carter did lean some on Mondale for special projects - dealing with Japan and maybe China, I think. Until then, the VP was a cipher in most cases.
Let’s look at this analytically and see what, if anything, it bodes for the trial, as I’m just tossing this idea off at the end of a long Friday afternoon….
I just remembered the title - its found in Hegemony Or Survival. It was toward the end of the book, in the last third or quarter of it. I do not have the book. I checked it out from the library.
Pachacutec @ 68
I’m worried. But then, I know you realize how Jane would kill you, so I’m confident you can find them. WHere’d you go after the court room last night? Did Clarice steal your passes?
Alter says on Hardb