
David Sirota, author and journalist, wants press access to the Capitol.
Not so simple.
He sent a letter to Lorraine Woeller at Businessweek, who controls the access why he wasn't given a pass:
From: Woellert, Lorraine [mailto:Lorraine_Woellert@businessweek.com]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 9:05 AM
To: David Sirota
Subject: for the recordQuestion:
"So, let me repeat my question for the fourth time: Is the committee arguing that, among others, Fred Barnes, Byron York, Terrence Jeffrey, Kate O'Bierne, etc. have "not become engaged or assist, directly or indirectly, in any lobbying, promotion, advertising, or publicity activity intended to influence legislation or any other action of the Congress?"
Answer:
"As I've said before, the committee plans to take a look at the specific concerns you've brought up. We appreciate you raising the issue, and all the research you've done. I again invite you to submit an application for credentials. However, per your biography, you identify yourself first and foremost as a political strategist and leader in the Progressive movement. In addition, In These Times has told us that you are on assignment writing a book, not on a freelance assignment for the magazine. As such, you currently do not qualify for periodical gallery credentials."
Lorraine Woellert
Correspondent
Financial Services & Legal Affairs
Business Week
1200 G. St. NW
Suite 1100
Washington, D.C., 20005
(202) 383-2221
Interesting. Fred Barnes has been a leader in sending the Anglican Church back to the Middle Ages, and this was not a problem. But David's "progressive leadership" is a problem.
Well, I think we should ask why they have two standards, one for the right, and one for everyone else.
Why not send along a polite, carefully worded e-mail making an appeal for David's access to the Hill? They live in fear of the right. The right are not the only people with voices.
(CHS says: Why, yes, this is a press pass from the Nine Inch Nails 2005 Tour. Why do you ask?)
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight



Support this site!
Keep
up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

{{{{{{{{JANE}}}}}}}}
FITZ!!!!!
If Jeff Gannon could get a press pass for the White House you’d think Sirota would have no problem.
This just shows how deep the propaganda machine runs and how desperate they are to keep the truth from being reported for fear of a nationwide revolt against NeoCon and Republican ideals.
Since JimmyJeff was mentioned in the last thread, how is it that he managed to get into the White House , what was it, 200 times, as a journalist?
Gilly,
Welcome to the Lake. Glad to have you visit at any time.
Hi Steve!
You’ve got to understand, they can’t let dirty hippies into the Capitol. Next thing you know, they’ll be making giant drip-wax candles and chanting for peace, and stuff.
I think y’all solved it. David should list male prostitution in his amended application, and that should grease the…erm…skids.
steve, great to see you swimming in the lake of firedogs
It’s so sad that ordinary people can’t get in and out of the Capitol anymore. I remember an easier era (the 80s!). I don’t know why he wants to sit in that stuffy little press gallery anyway. He’d be better off asking his Congressman to give him a broom closet for a finite period of time.
ifthethunderdontgetya @ 5
LMAO!
RevDeb @
3
The WH has lower standards than the Capitol for its journalists.
Really Big “Impeach” Sign in SF:
http://freewayblogger.blogspot.com
Be the media.
Perhaps David should write Mr. Wolcott and see if Vanity Fair needs a sometime DC political correspondent. ???
Peterr @ 10
They have even lower standards than Congress on almost everything….
Want some great music? Open a second browser and go to http://www.kcur.org and click on Listen Live on the left column for 3.5 more hours of terrific roots and blues music on this public radio Friday Night Fish Fry, and very little talking, while we enjoy the companionship here at FDL.
OT - from My DD - Nancy Pelosi is a very skillful person… big victory selecting her committee for the global warming.
smart, smart, smart.
(CHS says: Why, yes, this is a press pass from the Nine Inch Nails 2005 Tour. Why do you ask?)
all right, dish it: what scandalous things did Trent Reznor do?
HEY! YOU! DON’T TOUCH THE CURTAIN!!!
We are having this same issue in CA where the legislature has given sole control of Capitol press passes to some sketchy committee of a few publications who get to decide if they want to extend their monopoly to others. Guess what….
From a long conversation I had on Wednesday, it sounds like this has been going on all over the country. Sirota is a no, but Jeff Gannon is a yes. Why does this make sense?
Why does Business Week get to decide?
Maybe he should contact Nancy, or Harry?
Twisted Martini @ 20
peremptory invites…I like
E.S.AR @ 19:
I believe it is a rotating position.
Both Harry and Nancy realize that one of the keys to their success is to let the maximum amount of sunlight in. Allowing people outside the Kewl Kidz Klub to report on the goings on is a big step in that direction.
*evil grin* Ohhh, am I ever in the mood for this…
–MarkusQ
In addition to montags suggestion of Wolcott, this is right up Amy Goodmans alley. She might be able to help. Watching Democracy Now has been a thrill this week. She and Olbermann are the best of the other tube, imo.
Oddly enough, the Executive Board of the Periodical Press Gallery of the House of Representatives (gasp!) is in the midst of their elections, and guess who’s running again? From her campaign statement:
go scarlet p.
and all freeway bloggers!
OT -
RE: Libby trial. Sorry if this has been posted. Request for Andrea Mitchell’s notes has been withdrawn by the defense.
link
From the Tao of Dana Perino Deputy Press Whatever in today’s press briefing. In 2 Parts:
On escalation:
That’s one heck of an understatement, Dana. As is this:
It’s the story of his life or at least his effect on others.
Remember that “bipartisan” for the White House means the Republicans plus Joe Lieberman. “Civility” means agreeing with them even if they are in the minority. It is also worth noting, in passing, that Perino doesn’t ever get around to denying the substance of Pelosi’s statement.
And then there is this:
When I saw this, I thought Bush, thought process, extensive. Which of these does not belong? But then I saw the result of all this expenditure of cerebral calories: “he wants to win,” and I was reassured that not too many calories had been sacrificed in arriving at this monumental, and totally unexpected, conclusion.
Part 2:
Moving along:
The war in question is the Iraq war (aka Bush’s War) but Perino immediately invokes 911 and international terrorism (I’ve pretty much decided I am no longer going to play the Administration game of calling it a “war”). As support for Bush’s Iraq war continues to wane, the Administration has taken more and more obviously to conflating it with international terrorism. Rejecting the misleading label of “war on terror” only underlines how lame this tactic is.
I think I can unpuzzle Perino here. What Harry Reid is saying is that he doesn’t trust the President. Shocking, I know given his track record.
I don’t know about you but nothing says Peace to me like a second carrier battle group. It’s way better than a picture of doves framed in the peace symbol.
Finally, from the Department of the Kid who Killed his Parents with an Ax and then Threw Himself on the Mercy of the Court because He Was An Orphan:
Yeah, Bush, me too.
prostratedragon @ 26
So who gets to vote? Can the Dems vote the Business Week babe back out onto the streets? Now that would be nice! Also there are a couple of others up there for re-election who would be nice to see going elsewhere as well.
Hugh: brilliant, comme toujours.
I don’t know about you but nothing says Peace to me like a second carrier battle group. It’s way better than a picture of doves framed in the peace symbol.
but, but, but…it’s the USS Olive Branch!
Now if we’re talking about…
here’s another way to look at it…
From BBC:
Sound like something that could have happened here?
Fun with words…
How much does boosh want to
imitateemulate FDR?Hugh- I won’t risk a zig by quoting your comments, but above were great, as all others. Let me know Whenever I need to do a comment that includes your hilarious and telling series of comments on “Defense of English”. I think some newbies may need to read these.
Like this:
punaise @ 32
Thanks, it’s nice to be appreciated. Reagan called an ICBM the Peacekeeper so that would fit.
Hey from Russia—Is Jane still in the ICU?
Valley Girl @ 34
Glad you liked it. Feel free and enjoy.
Hugh @ 36
And, since most of the MX “Peacekeepers” have been retired, I guess that means there’s no more peace to keep….
VG—what about one a night during Late Night? I’ll help if you need a hand.
http://www.salon.com/news/feat.....e_crosses/
If Mr. Sirota doesn’t qualify for a press pass, why should he receive one?
Okay, never mind. I’ll do it anyway.
In defense of English I and II by Hugh
III
IV
V
VI
VII
egregious @ 37
egregious: this, from Digby at 11:23 PST this morning:
RBG @ 40
RBG- I assume it was the Anguish language posts/ comments by Hugh that you were alluding to? As it happens, I have them all bookmarked, bec. I thought that they were so great. If not that, what? xo (edit- seem my #43 above)
stibbert @ 42
Because Fred Barnes doesn’t qualify and he got one.
stibbert @ 42
Um, Fair and Balanced treatment? Read the post through again, and if you have further questions . . .
Valley Girl @
45
Nice work for a gal who until recently couldn’t do that linky thingy.
egregious — did your equipment survive mostly intact? Your post sounded like there was serious damage done on your entry into the country.
RBG- thanks! I have been around here so long, way back, that I am set in my ways, and didn’t even notice until recently the “link” option in comments. Back when, it would have taken a lot more work! I had been kinda wondering why it was that all the other FDLers knew HTML code!
From their “About” page (sorry, I’m in the middle of the kind of protein run that people descended from hunters get)
Eureka Springs if you’re still around you have mail.
Mildly OT: But i just got back from the Michigan Kossack/blogger meetup in my neighborhood. I met our offical blogger/netroots liason with Governor Granholm and found something i can do on my own.
The meeting was fun, and educational for me just to learn the political landscape. For now? it’s a gathering of talent and finding out what each of us can do. Gods that was FUN.
Now i need to think of something ot post elsewhere so regarding the personal project i took on.
Regarding David? Unfortunately that’s the landscape of today. If you don’t have connections, you don’t get into press access areas. People are taking steps to question that old boy network. Which is probably the best thing that can possibly be done! Questioning and pushing for equal access. Elitism is a good half of why our current media is so off.
Valley Girl @
50
Did you catch twolf’s link last night?
prostratedragon @ 51
Sounds like he could make the grade as a blogger (writer for an online publication)!
oregondave @ 49
Thanks for the Jane update! Please send her my love from this hemisphere.
Some of the stuff I brought can still be used. I feel a little like Oklahoma Kiddo at any mention of Senator Clinton…can’t go into it much because I’m still so angry. We lost about $1,000 worth of stuff.
But we were able to salvage the rest. I will just bring more next time, and of course there will be a next time.
When I get fed up and decide to quit, really quit, then I think about the kids and who is going to step into my shoes if I leave them?
Sigh.
Arianna visited Jane in the ICU today. she has a nice piece up at Huffington Post on it. Sweet!
hi hackworth,
It’s soitenly possible that current holders shouldn’t have their passes, & that their status should be reviewed as Ms. Woellert said.
Meybe the Business Week team is trying to apply the rules more rigorously than others did when they had the responsibility.
RBG @ 54
Did not, but just checked it out. So sweet, that itty bitty kitty!
Richmond @ 57
Here.
Thanks Dave on the linky. I’ll get the hang one of these days.
egregious- maybe when you get back you can do a post on your blog about the types of equipment you need. I was really shocked when I went to observe eye surgery in the UK (!) and found that they only had one pair of iridectomy scissors, of the kind that I had 3 of, to cut up locust nervous systems! There is a lot of “old” scientific equipment listed on ebay, and I know several scientists who have bought this stuff. Sellers really didn’t know much about what they were selling, and it went for low $$. Let me know if I can help in this regard.
Richmond @ 61
No prob. A quick tutorial: Copy the URL => Highlight the text in your post you want the link to launch from => Click the LINK button => Paste into the small window that comes up => Follow the button instructions from there . . . Voila!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.....39107.html
Here is my first try - dedicated to Jane!
Richmond—great job. I got the link all the way over here :)
You can post it and then go back in and edit if you like, within the 5 minutes. It’s also possible to try out your link in Preview. I make a copy of what I have written before going from Preview to the link, maybe that’s not necessary.
Ta Dah it worked, but I wasn’t able to do it neatly -as in the “here” in yours. That lesson probably comes only in the second semester!
stibbert @ 58
Maybe they’ll give Fred Barnes the hook.
stibbert @ 58
More from the Gallery site:
So presumably the delicate semantics of this phrase are all against Sirota, and all for the scores of other current members. (Publications here [In These Times not currently a member]; individuals here.)
Great Egregious! I pushed the keys down extra hard so it would make it over the Atlantic!
ArthurKC @ 14
I used to live in KC, and I miss the Fish Fry.
*sniff*
But I’ll be fine. Really.
Richmond @ 69
:)
Richmond @ 65
Queueing up “Pomp and Circumstance” on the old Victrola now. Congrats!
LOL Dave.
@68: It is an interesting - and pretty broad list of journals allowed in! That would be an interesting story in its own right.
Valley Girl @ 34
Encore! Encore!
Valley Girl—
Thanks for the ideas and encouragement. We almost always bring new equipment, either purchased or donated new, because maintenance and obsolescence are a huge issue here. If you can’t get spare parts, you can’t use the equipment anymore.
My issues are somewhat unusual, in that relatively speaking the organization has sufficient funds. The big problem is making sure the president doesn’t get totally burned out. [me] That’s why I periodically reach out for emotional support and spend so much time working for mental stability.
If I can get those working, productivity => zooom.
As to writing a post specifically about purchasing and transporting equipment across international lines, there are aspects of this which are better left for my book. Twenty years from now.
Richmond @ 73
The sign says long-haired freaky people need not apply.
prostratedragon @ 68
That would seem to exclude just about all of ‘em.
Richmond- so this is an added tutorial, and it took me so long to even notice this was possible. You are fine with copy and paste, okay? So you have a link that you have copied and want to add to your comment at FDL. Click on the “link” tab that shows up in comments, and paste your link to replace the “http” thingy that shows up in black. Okay, that’s done. But that sends you to a next option, and THERE, you type in the words you wish to use to replace the long link. As in, “news Jane”- that is what you could have typed in. Ask again, if I need to give you further info.
oregondave @ 77
Sychophantic bootlickers are welcome, however.
egregious- Roger Bravo. I made my comment because there are certain types of “scientific equipment” that don’t go out of date, like dissecting tools and microscope parts.
pd @ 68,
Thanks for the add’l info. Would be great if all the press-passes were reviewed for strict conformance w/ the published standards, and that the more obvious wrong’uns (at least) were weeded out.
Valley Girl @ 78
I tried it twice, but it printed both as in the below where I wanted to put in emptywheel’s piece at Kos
Empty Wheel article
This situation makes me wish that Ramparts hadn’t gone out of business. There are so few periodicals today doing what that publication did. I’m just now rereading a Ramparts article from almost forty years ago on the intertwining of Michigan State and the CIA in Vietnam.
I’m guessing many of the regulars are madly refreshing their browsers now, angling for the pole position on the Late Nite post . . . ;>)
OH wait - it did work! But for your eyes - not mine at first. Dah!!! Thanks so much. By the way, emptywheel’s piece on the Libby trial is terrific.
oregondave @
77
My point, really. (Now that I’ve eaten something, I can formulate such thoughts, orat least agree with yours, instead of shrieking for mass disarticulations … [she pats daintily with a napkin] … )
Richmond @ 85
Yes!!! It did work!!!! TADA!!!!
stibbert @ 81
My personal philosophy in general, and preference is for more inclusion, less exclusion. If we could send people to the moon, we should be able to build more Gallery space . . .
newspaperbrat @ 52
You are a peach. Just sent a reply.
LAT:
Imagine the irony when the same outcome (lower energy use, etc.) takes place in the US due to economic pessimism aka recession. Watch the tech sector take back all its recent gains over the next few months.
Will the market “discount” Dick?
Late Nite post’s up top.
What is Lorraine W’s email? It’s not easy to find!
MS @ 92
Lorraine_Woellert@businessweek.com
I’m going to post this here and on Late Nite:
From the list of the Periodical Press Gallery of the House of Representatives, these are the “news” organizations that have the most accredited members. The numbers are approximate because the site has a very odd way of listing members’ names. I tried to include all organizations with more than 20 credentialed members. I added Business Week because this is Lorraine Woellert’s publication.
Army Times Publishing Co. 50
Aviation Week 26
BNA News 166
*Business Week 18
Chronicle of Higher Education 43
Education Week 29
FDC Reports 42
Inside Washington Publishers 58
Kiplinger Washington Editors 29
McGraw-Hill Company 54
National Journal 48
Newsweek 22
Roll Call 28
Tax Notes 45
The Hill 26
Thompson Publishing Group 38
Time Magazine 25
U. S. News & World Report 27
UCG 22
http://periodical.house.gov/index.shtml
These are brief descriptions drawn from their websites:
BNA reports on information and analysis products for professionals in law, tax, business, and government.
FDC Reports for pharmaceutical and healthcare executives, policymakers, and analysts reporting on developments affecting regulation and marketing of healthcare products and services.
Inside Washington Publishers behind-the-scenes coverage of the federal policy process for professionals in Washington, across the United States, and around the world, etc.
Thompson Publishing Group reports on compliance information for professionals in business and government
UCG: unknown
As prostratedragon notes from the Press Gallery site:
However if you use Time and Newsweek as benchmarks, it quickly becomes obvious that some fairly obscure publications have a very major presence in the Gallery with consequent influence over it. Probably just a coincidence how many of them deal with taxes and regulation.
Bottomline: There is something pretty odd about the makeup of the Press Gallery and if it isn’t made up of lobbyists, it sure isn’t doing much not to look like it is.
stibbert @
42
Mr. Sirota engages in bona fide acts of journalism. Fred Barnes and other examples identified above, abandoned any pretext of committing journalism years ago.
I do not advocate revoking press credentials for those who do not bother using their congressional passes for journalistic pursuits.
However, it is a democratic and 1st Amendment obscenity that people such as Mr. Sirota who are deserving of a congressional press pass due to their legitimate journalistic pursuits, are arbitrarily denied press access. This is especially true in light of the fact that the press gallery has for years credentialed disassembling propagandist who despise journalism and actively choose to never in engage in journalism. People (once again Fred Barnes and others noted above) are paid NOT to report, but to distort. They are on the payroll of the behind-the-scenes entities whose agenda is to do everything possible to insure that the typical American news consumer is unable to understand - or completely misled - about what congress is actually doing.
It is really snowing today — FINALLY!
kfl
Here’s an email message I sent her.
Ms. Woellert:
Frankly, it sounds to me as if you are penalizing David Sirota for being more honest than his counterparts on the right. For instance, no rational human being could pretend that Sirota works more to achieve progressive goals than, say, O’Beirne does to achieve … well, regressive goals. And no rational human being could pretend that a majority of the journalists who write about politics haven’t tried to influence Congress. That’s “wink-wink, nod-nod” disingenuousness.
I’m not sure I understand why it matters whether Sirota is working freelance rather than on commission. And I don’t understand the distinction between working on a book and working on an article. How many books comprise collections of more or less edited articles? That distinction seems equally disingenuous.
I would urge that you be guided by common sense and fairness. Of course Sirota is an activist as well as a journalist. So was Edward R. Murrow; so was/is William Buckley; so was/is Bill Moyers—and so are a lot of the persons to whom you have given passes for this event.
Sincerely,