mandrake @ 193
Oh, they’re doing something about it alright. They’re going pass a “symbolic” resolution. That’ll really show ‘im. Quaking in his boots, I’m sure.

As I read this too fast, I thought you said symbiotic resolution and I was ‘yup…nodding’.

Where there’s a wll, there’s a way. We keep showin our Congresscritters the will, they’ll find the way.

they may just be confused about whether he is DUI or DWI

‘Bad behavior’?

“House Minority Leader John Boehner, who had promised last May that ”bad behavior” by House Republicans who voted against their leadership would not be rewarded, announced to a party conference Wednesday that reform Rep. Jeff Flake of Arizona was being removed from the Judiciary Committee.
With the change in House control, several Republicans had to be removed from committees. However, Flake was about halfway up the Judiciary panel in seniority, and this was his priority appointment. The decision was made by the Republican Steering Committee, dominated by Appropriations members who resent Flake’s vigorous campaign against earmarks.”

“Boehner later told Flake he was purged because of his verbal attacks on party leaders.”

Would Rep Flake be looking for a new party?

“I’m gonna fart over there- so that I don’t have ta fart HERE” is also OK

How about, “I’m gonna die over there so I don’t have to die over here.”?

rwcole @ 123

Is Condi gay? I have no idea- but if she IS- then you’ve got a pretty interesting psychological study- a gay, black , female makes a career out of kissing the asses of those who are making a political killing out of oppressing the three minority groups that she is a member of!!

How would ya splain that one?

These thoughts of your’s have crossed my mind. But then what to make of the Log Cabin Republicans? ;)

Uriah Heep

There’s a political solution to our military problem.

Dick Cheney must go.

The investigations are about to begin. Libby’s gonna get Fitz’d. The congressional subpoenas will be issued. The weariness over constitutional erosion is palpable.

So in advance of the predictable claims of executive privilege, I believe the call for his resignation must begin to rise. Political will for the necessary must begin to be accumulated.

It may seems a bit premature to some, but I expect it will resonate broadly as events unfold. There is no unitary executive. Not in this country. Sorry about yer luck Dick.

“The object is a larger one, and the original overarching goal of this administration: expanding executive power, for its own sake”.

http://www.slate.com/id/2157493/

Since I expect no reader here to disagree with the above quote, then let’s ask ourselves why we feel obliged to put up with this any longer.

Congress is suffering fom a type of learned helplessness. Public outcry from most quarters must create intestinal fortitude.

http://www.democrats.com/Congr…..e-Syndrome

As I have said before, time is exceedingly of the essence. Do we really want Dick driving the bus at the next geopolitical crossroad?

The framers put the impeachment clauses in the constitution for scenarios like this. Exercising our rights is an imperative. No signing statement on this one.

Once this is all over, we will look back and wish Dick had spared us the inevitable vitriol. Men in multi-thousand dollar suits will try and tell America that this is complicated. It’s not. He’s a bad man. He’s an enemy of the republic. He should’ve been cuffed years ago.

Join the call for his resignation today.

twolf1 @ 214

cricket – the other OTHER white meat

…more here

Many folks fail tp appreciate how tricky those are to filet.

I thought it was funny that they are Tommy Yum flavor.

cricket – the other OTHER white meat

…more here

Many folks fail tp appreciate how tricky those are to filet.

The diversity of FDL is again illustrated in the last few comments here. Excellent insight into the misrepresentations of Carter.

I was born in honolulu when it was but a territory, of two American citizens. I have always been an American citizen and have never had it questioned.

Nobody’s questioning whether you’re a citizen–it’s whether you could be president. As I said upfront, I think both you and McClain wouldn’t have any trouble getting the court to rule in your favor. I’m just trying to be a troublemaker wrt his base. But maybe I’m wrong–I don’t understand cleter’s argument about Gitmo and the 1790 law, but that’s not surprising as IANAL.