Comments on: Feingold, Democrats to Support Office of Public Integrity http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/08/feingold-democrats-to-support-office-of-public-integrity/ Firedoglake weblog Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:56:21 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: mui http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/08/feingold-democrats-to-support-office-of-public-integrity/#comment-448732 mui Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:54:11 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/08/feingold-democrats-to-support-office-of-public-integrity/#comment-448732 <p><i>Senator Feingold would like to ask the White House a few questions about why they think a Presidential signing statement makes it okay for the President to open our mail without obtaining a warrant. Raw Story has the letter (h/t to twolf1).</i><br /> Sweet!<br /> I second others that Feingold looks hotter in every picture, but it’s probably not a purely objective assessment of his looks. I just really like what he sometimes has to say.</p> Senator Feingold would like to ask the White House a few questions about why they think a Presidential signing statement makes it okay for the President to open our mail without obtaining a warrant. Raw Story has the letter (h/t to twolf1).
Sweet!
I second others that Feingold looks hotter in every picture, but it’s probably not a purely objective assessment of his looks. I just really like what he sometimes has to say.

]]> By: William http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/08/feingold-democrats-to-support-office-of-public-integrity/#comment-448707 William Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:31:10 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/08/feingold-democrats-to-support-office-of-public-integrity/#comment-448707 <p><a href="#comment-447859"><em>mandrake @ 7 </em></a></p> <blockquote><p>Feingold is sexy. Nothing like a man with brains and integrity.</p></blockquote> <p>Totally sexy. I’d have his jelly-baby, if only he would ask!</p> mandrake @ 7

Feingold is sexy. Nothing like a man with brains and integrity.

Totally sexy. I’d have his jelly-baby, if only he would ask!

]]> By: PoliticalCritic http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/08/feingold-democrats-to-support-office-of-public-integrity/#comment-448374 PoliticalCritic Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:35:04 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/08/feingold-democrats-to-support-office-of-public-integrity/#comment-448374 <p>It’s a shame Feingold isn’t running for President. He’s far better than all the other candidates out there.</p> It’s a shame Feingold isn’t running for President. He’s far better than all the other candidates out there.

]]> By: That Girl http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/08/feingold-democrats-to-support-office-of-public-integrity/#comment-448278 That Girl Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:11:34 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/08/feingold-democrats-to-support-office-of-public-integrity/#comment-448278 <p>Wouldn’t Feingold/Obama be a wonderful (and handsome) ticket for 08?</p> Wouldn’t Feingold/Obama be a wonderful (and handsome) ticket for 08?

]]> By: bob h http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/08/feingold-democrats-to-support-office-of-public-integrity/#comment-448253 bob h Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:32:51 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/08/feingold-democrats-to-support-office-of-public-integrity/#comment-448253 <p>Doesn’t Feingold have a Bush censure bill that should be dusted off now?</p> Doesn’t Feingold have a Bush censure bill that should be dusted off now?

]]> By: grokgov http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/08/feingold-democrats-to-support-office-of-public-integrity/#comment-448217 grokgov Tue, 09 Jan 2007 08:04:19 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/08/feingold-democrats-to-support-office-of-public-integrity/#comment-448217 <p>GO RUSS!!!</p> GO RUSS!!!

]]> By: enigma4ever http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/08/feingold-democrats-to-support-office-of-public-integrity/#comment-448192 enigma4ever Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:21:06 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/08/feingold-democrats-to-support-office-of-public-integrity/#comment-448192 <p>thanks for posting this- now I have something to watch for on cspan…too bad Feingold won’t run- Obama/Feingold would be quite the ticket on 08…..</p> thanks for posting this- now I have something to watch for on cspan…too bad Feingold won’t run- Obama/Feingold would be quite the ticket on 08…..

]]> By: farang http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/08/feingold-democrats-to-support-office-of-public-integrity/#comment-448139 farang Tue, 09 Jan 2007 06:24:02 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/08/feingold-democrats-to-support-office-of-public-integrity/#comment-448139 <p>Wanna support integrity in US Government?</p> <p>Easy cheesy: Defund Homeland Security, and then we’ll listen. And after you defund and and remove the Patriot Act from the laws of this land, then we’ll not only listen, we’ll actually pay attention to you corporate whores.</p> <p>How’s that for a little something new? Get used to it. Produce now, or go the hell away in ‘08.</p> Wanna support integrity in US Government?

Easy cheesy: Defund Homeland Security, and then we’ll listen. And after you defund and and remove the Patriot Act from the laws of this land, then we’ll not only listen, we’ll actually pay attention to you corporate whores.

How’s that for a little something new? Get used to it. Produce now, or go the hell away in ‘08.

]]> By: dab from CT http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/08/feingold-democrats-to-support-office-of-public-integrity/#comment-448128 dab from CT Tue, 09 Jan 2007 06:16:38 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/08/feingold-democrats-to-support-office-of-public-integrity/#comment-448128 <p><a href="#comment-447950"><em>Blub @ 86 </em></a></p> <blockquote><p>I missed this when it first came out on the 7th.. am I misreading this official NYT board editorial calling for rigorous committee hearings, or is the newspaper outright accusing the president of criminal misconduct?</p> <p>The Imperial Presidency 2.0<br /> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/07/opinion/07sun1.html?_r=1&oref=slogin">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01.....ref=slogin</a></p></blockquote> <p>Yes, when I read the editorial on Sunday that is exactly what I thought - they are calling out Bush for criminal misconduct.</p> Blub @ 86

I missed this when it first came out on the 7th.. am I misreading this official NYT board editorial calling for rigorous committee hearings, or is the newspaper outright accusing the president of criminal misconduct?

The Imperial Presidency 2.0
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01…..ref=slogin

Yes, when I read the editorial on Sunday that is exactly what I thought – they are calling out Bush for criminal misconduct.

]]> By: Mary http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/08/feingold-democrats-to-support-office-of-public-integrity/#comment-448097 Mary Tue, 09 Jan 2007 06:01:02 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/08/feingold-democrats-to-support-office-of-public-integrity/#comment-448097 <p>Way epu’d, but thanks for this. Feingold & Leahy make you feel like there are real Senators in the Senate - I had seen one of these items, but not both. It seems to me like there is a little coordination and divying up going on - Leahy with war profiteering one day; Murtha with pressure on war funding another; Feingold on signing statements another…</p> <p>With Dem’s like Lieberman and with Johnson’s health (bless and keep), we need all the A game Feingold and Leahy have and if Obama is wanting to step up to the plate on something, so much the better. I’m not a big Obama fan, but I do remember he had the good sense to distance himself from the Lieberman/McCain ethics and integrity approach. Plus, he made a “grouchy old man” quip about McCain.</p> Way epu’d, but thanks for this. Feingold & Leahy make you feel like there are real Senators in the Senate – I had seen one of these items, but not both. It seems to me like there is a little coordination and divying up going on – Leahy with war profiteering one day; Murtha with pressure on war funding another; Feingold on signing statements another…

With Dem’s like Lieberman and with Johnson’s health (bless and keep), we need all the A game Feingold and Leahy have and if Obama is wanting to step up to the plate on something, so much the better. I’m not a big Obama fan, but I do remember he had the good sense to distance himself from the Lieberman/McCain ethics and integrity approach. Plus, he made a “grouchy old man” quip about McCain.

]]>