
A few weeks ago, we were discussing the mysterious poisoning death of former Russian secret serviceman Alexander Litvinenko. At that juncture, most people discussing the issue were of the theory that the assassination was carried out by the Putin government, but something about that just didn't seem quite right to me.
The other lingering question is, obviously, who did it and why. Occam's razor says to always go for the simplest explanation, and that would be that the Kremlin silenced Litvinenko as well as Moscow journalist Anna Politkovskaya. That just doesn't sit right with me, though. Why go to so much trouble when all they had to do was shoot him and leave his body in an alley? Why invoke such a public, excruciating death, one that would enable Litvinenko to point the finger of blame at the Putin government?
And from this post on December 1st:
And here's where I am going to venture into the realm of rank speculation. My personal theory is that this and other recent murders of Putin's ideological opponents (that link is to a story about journalist Anna Politkovskaya, who was gunned down in the elevator of her Moscow apartment building) may not in fact be the work of the Kremlin, but rather the work of some agency with a direct interest in bringing down the Putin government.
In the years since the introduction of the free-market system in Russia, the Russian mafia has amassed a huge amount of wealth and power, as well as private citizens like jailed petroleum oligarch Mikhail Kordorkovsky. Moscow now has the highest concentration of millionaires of any city in the world. When capitalism came to the former USSR, some savvy operators seized that opportunity to suck up and hoard most of the money in the country.
There are very powerful interests at work here, and it would not surprise me to find that this plot has layers on layers of intrigue. You may need a state apparatus to make polonium-210, particularly what appears to be a "weaponized" form, but all you need to buy it is money. At every stage of the process, there are people who could potentially be bought out or threatened. And one thing the power players in the former Soviet Union have in abundance is money.
So, I would not be so eager to lay the blame for this and other seemingly politically motivated murders at the feet of the Putin administration. Not because I believe that they are particularly good or just, but because I think it would be hasty to assume that they are the only malevolent actors in this particular drama.
My initial specualtion was that perhaps Litvinenko was murdered by parties acting on behalf of Yukos Oil CEO Mikhail Kordorkovsky. Just prior to his poisoning, Litvinenko had returned to the UK from Israel, where he met with former Yukos executive Leonid Nevzlin to bring him a purported dossier of the Kremlin's dirty tricks against Yukos.
A DOSSIER drawn up by Alexander Litvinenko on the Kremlin's takeover of the world's richest energy giant will be given to Scotland Yard overnight as police investigate the former KGB spy's secret dealings with some of Russia's richest men.
It emerged yesterday that Mr Litvinenko travelled to Israel just weeks before he died to hand over evidence to a Russian billionaire of how agents working for President Vladimir Putin dealt with his enemies running the Yukos oil company.
He passed this information to Leonid Nevzlin, the former second-in-command of Yukos, who fled to Tel Aviv in fear for his life after the Kremlin seized and then sold off the $US40 billion ($51 billion) company.
My personal theory here was that Litvinenko may have used that meeting to attempt to extort money from the Yukos executives through some form of blackmail, leading to an order by the oligarchs for his assassination. While I may have been slightly off in that regard, according to CBS's "60 Minutes" tonight, I may have actually been in the ball-park.
(CBS)
In the months before his death, Litvinenko needed money; he needed a job and spoke of having found one. What was that job? Litvinenko spoke to Julia Svetlichnaya, a Russian graduate student, who sought out his help on a book she was writing. But what he wanted to talk about were his plans concerning those rich and powerful Russian oligarchs."He told me that, at that moment, he’s doing a project for blackmailing one of the Russian oligarchs which resides in UK," Svetlichnaya tells Simon. "He thought that it was actually an o.k. thing to do because this particular person, as Litvinenko claimed, had a connection with the Kremlin, had a connection with Putin. And so in his view it, was o.k. to blackmail him."
In the "60 Minutes" report, Bob Simon asks security expert Mark Galeotti:
"There are many ways to kill a man. Using an obscure radioactive isotope is a rather uncommon way. Why do you think this way was chosen?"
Galeotti: "Essentially it’s because of the theater of assassination. If all you want to do is silence someone, then you push them under a bus, you arrange an apparent mugging that’s gone wrong, or something like that," Galeotti says. "If you’re going to carry out a killing using a radioactive isotope like this, you want it to be a big story."
Which brings me back to this assertion of mine from December:
UPDATE: In the comments we were just discussing that if someone other than the Russian government is doing this, they're not just sending a signal to the Kremlin that says, "We are framing you for these murders," they're also saying, "We have access to your nuclear chemicals."
Or someone's nuclear chemicals. Otherwise, why not use ricin again or just a gun?
I still believe this. Someone may well be sending a message to the Kremlin. I am not an apologist for the Putin regime by any stretch of the imagination, but I think it's naïve for us to assume that the only bad actors in this murder are the FSB and the Kremlin.
We may never know what happened, and the last thing I want to do is fall into the Pajamas Media trap of stating as unassailable fact that somehow I know better what's happening in this case than the highly trained professionals on the ground, especially from way over here at my laptop in Athens, Georgia. Still, I will be watching this story unfold even more closely now and I will be very, very eager to see what Dr. Hillhouse at The Spy Who Billed Me has to say about it.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Fitz? Being the first commenter twice in one day is too weird.
Fitz! TRex!
Brownandserve @ 0
That seems to be the way of it, though. When you’re on a roll, you’re on a roll. Nice of twolf1 to let some other people have a shot at the prize.
Pelosi!
OT, but Spocko’s site is back up.
ouiski @ 4
Viva Spocko!
it’s gotta be the mob… just gotta be - it’s the only thing that makes any sense…
Well, for a dinosaur, you may have scoped it out some.
But, who has wanted their hands on Russian oil for, oh, since the US put the former Soviet Union through the wringer with an economic “shock and awe” program?
OldCoastie @ 6
Well, clearly, I’m going to have to make Eason Jordan buy me a ticket to London to go and sort this shit out.
I think when you wrote
you hit the nail on the head. I suspect that in addition to the “known unknowns” there are “unknown unknowns” (to use a rummy-ism) that we haven’t even thought about.
TRex @ 9
clearly!
;-)
On this story, I recall that a number of people who were in contact with Litvinenko were also affected by the Polonium 210. I’ve had a quick look but can’t find any follow-up on their condition. Does anyone know more?
As I recall there was quite a bit of polonium controversy in those threads. I find whirledview is generally a technically impeccable source; here’s CKR’s take on it in her Polonium FAQ.
Persiflage @ 11
No one else is seriously sick, although the Italian spook that met with Litvinenko in London received five times the lethal dose. He’s in jail in Italy right now on unrelated charges, but so far he is symptom free.
TRex @ 14
Thanks T-rex, I knew you’d know. What knowledgable therapod you are! Typical of me, I feel for the innocent bystanders. Who knew professional assassins were such drama queens!
Only slightly off-topic, but, I simply have to ask: how is a Houston-based new energy source consortium not going to be heavily influenced by the oil industry–especially when it was a boondoggle from the start initiated by Tom DeLay?
montag @ 16
I have no answer Montag, just wanted to thank you for using one of my favourite words - boondoggle!
Persiflage @ 16
You’re going to be hearing and reading it a lot in the near future, methinks. :)
Thanks for updating this, TRex. I have been following this story closely.
Tis a great who-done-it with a large cast of characters and each cast member is not quite what they appear to be.
Wasn’t the Italian guy, who 60 Minutes tonight said in in jail on unrelated matters, also involved in the Niger forgeries or is my memory faulty (again)?
Suzanne @ 18
Umm, no, your memory is fine. There’s no evidence per se that he was directly involved, but, he was the guy Italian intelligence sent over to brief Stephen Hadley and to say, “hi, guys.”
And, as I recall, he is old buddies with Michael Ledeen….
montag @ 18
I imagine I’ll be seeing quite a lot of favourite words like investigation, prosecution conviction and impeachment.
Small quibble, TRex.
horde should be hoard.
Tho’ given this is the realm of the forces of Tamerlane and Genghis and assorted other hordes…maybe not…
And 60 Minutes may be almost as old as your theropod self but it still rocks!
Holy shit.
Persiflage @ 20
We can only hope, and, in a Republican political sense, add “implosion” to that list. :)
Dam ewe, homonyms!!
Prairie Sunshine @ 22
quibblette?
punaise @ 25
Or, in America-speak, a mini-quibble.
punaise @ 26
Would quibblette not be a female quibble? Maybe a small quibble is a quibbling.
montag @
20
Ledeen is always right, you know. Just ask him.
TRex @ 23
That was why I was asking - my reaction was very, very similar.
montag @ 27
Quibbles and Bits.
Whored?
Prairie Sunshine @ 22
one Steppe at a time
S’quibble?
bonkers @ 30
Or, if we’re referring to a MalKKKin exclusive, Quibbles and Twits.
Or, should I say, Squibbles and Twits.
or, as the eyes glaze over after a loooooonnnng day… quibbie.
montag @ 35
Speaking of Twits…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRBkgshj8Cw
I like quiblings.
TRex @ 37
You were always a family-values sort of dinosaur…. :)
montag @ 35
Queeg ills and …
TRex @ 38
Quiblings is good. Better than Quibchen.
I need to fix myself something to eat before it gets too late. I’ll be back in a bit.
punaise @ 39
amber grits.
Amber waives off grain…
montag @
20
John LeCarre’s mind must be about to explode.
and, as my ol’ pal Hunter S. Thompson once said:
“When the going gets wierd, the wierd turn pro.”
why is it when I read “Malkin”, I see Quibbles and Tits?
Oilfieldguy @
32
is a horde of whores a hoard?
Prairie Sunshine @ 43
Because perps shall mount stains mo’ in jest, eh?
Fern @
41
Or perhaps quibligula.
fahrender @ 46
Harum Scarum. :)
prostratedragon @ 49
Quibligula…whose incessant nitpicking nearly brought the Julio-Claudian dynasty to its knees!
Aha - here is the why of his being arrested and by who (dated 12/25/06):
bold mine - I wonder whose secrets and what kind of arms?
montag @
50
sadaam’s madam.
I have previously noted here the similarity of the deaths of Litvinenko and Cyrus Hashemi, an Iranian banker and arms merchant, who in July 1986 in the peak of health, one week after a clean physical exam, checked in to a London hospital, was diagnosed as having Leukemia, and died a week later. It turns out that he played a pivotal role in the October Surprise and the Iran/Contra scandal. Apparently, he set up a sting that netted high-level folks in both the U.S. government and that of Israel.
Three weeks before the Litvenenko case occurred, a well-connected friend of a friend told me that Hashemi had been slipped a plutonium cigarette. That made a bit of sense at the time, but when polonium was mentioned the Litvinenko case, I assumed I had mis-heard. Whatever.
It would seem to me that a difficult to detect substance that creates the symptoms of leukemia would be the choice of folks who want to hide the fact of an assination and to make it difficult to suspect and/or trace.
Obviously, that wasn’t the case with Litvinenko, though it may have been in the case of Hashemi.
I spent a few hours googling on this stuff one night, and found some of the most bizarre conspiracy-theory stuff I’ve ever read — straight out of the X Files.
Oilfieldguy @ 32
Where?
Suzanne @ 51
Hmm, now I have to backtrack on what I said previously, because I had made an assumption, because no names were previously mentioned.
The guy I was thinking of was Nicolo Pollari, who was head of Italian intelligence, who was questioned by the Italian authorities for his role in the abduction of the Egyptian cleric, Hassan Mustafa Osama Nasr.
TRex @
6
and the General is really hot this weekend. he’s got a great suggestion for Bob Eiger and KSFO and the perfect remedy for Fuckwad’s delimma.
Later, she was asked, did you hoard all that money yourself, she responded that her sister whored half of it.
hmmm planet planet has an article that somewhat gives his background… i could find no mention of ladeen in it but…
Sushi bar man is a nuclear waste expert.
also, during tonights 60 minutes, they gave the timeline as meeting at the sushi bar followed by the meeting at the hotel, where the poisoning is believed to have occurred. if that timeline is correct, how did sushibar man also get radiated? he was in the hospital for his exposure and this arrest followed his release.
fahrender @ 57
Viva Spocko!
and the General is really hot this weekend. he’s got a great suggestion for Bob Eiger and KSFO and the perfect remedy for Fuckwad’s delimma.
Fuckwad’s dilemma?
Sophist’s Choice.
montag @ 56
musatafa beena someone else
Notify Hans Blix.
“Hello, I’m Hans looking for arms.”
back in the ’90’s when the FBI was trying to deal with the Russian Mafia’s inroads into the U.S. somebody put it this way:
” The Italian Mafia dropped out of school. They play checkers. The Russian Mafia have PhD’s. They’re fond of chess.”
Oilfieldguy @ 62
“….and I’m going to, uhh, wrist the culprit”
glen beck is dangerous.
take care y’all. gotta go pretend i’m working ……..
“Hello, I’m Hans looking for arms.”
Hello, I’m Arn looking for Hans. I vant to pump you up.
punaise @ 60
Don’t think so… he was, uh, sama guy they were looking to na(b), sir.
ReneND @ 64
Only because he and the people who hired him are terminally stupid.
This whole story is very John Le Carre, innit?
Oh TRex, you have to pull out this topic when I can’t stay and play!! Fooey!!
Wigwam (54) — yeah, had seen the Po-210 cigarette, but I think I kicked this one around with Larisa at AtLargely.com; symptoms aren’t of inhalation but ingestion. Worse, it looked to me like multiple exposures; Spy Who Billed Me validated that, looks like she thinks 2 exposures (one in sushi bar, one in hotel room, sloppy “application”).
After doing more research and following a bunch of stories on Russia, it’s not at all clear that this was the oligarchs and NOT FSB. Because of time constraints I can’t supply links, sorry — but can say that at least one outlet said the Po-210 was FSB-origin (some sort of chemical or nuclear attribute that ID’d the material). There have been comments in other sources that there is a dual-agent — someone who is in Putin’s administration or FSB, who is also inside with the oligarchs, and may be loyal to the FSB. Also have seen other commentary that says Italian PM elected over Berlusconi is actually FSB person (watch out, Scaramella, if you’re not FSB, too).
And then there’s the entire debacle that is the global energy war, with Russia extorting massive rolling price increases from buyers of natural gas — starting with Ukraine a couple of years ago (one poisoned presidential-candidate), Georgia, now Belarus. Thought they’d also rolled Turkey, Poland, Germany (one of which been supplying the UK with natural gas, and at least two of which receive natural gas through Belarus), but this needs checking.
And now new contracts with the third largest source of natural gas in the world, Turkmenistan (whose president conveniently dropped dead a couple of weeks ago, before the new agreements).
Oh, BTW, the 2nd largest supplier of natural gas is…[drumroll]…Iran, who had a purchase agreement worth about US$850 million with Russia dating back to 1995 for uranium enrichment technology.
As el Gato Negro says: So.
(p.s. FSB = formerly known as KGB)
Southern California currently has a murder trail, 5 victims dumped into a reservior, involving Russian mafia. One turned state witness and his quote is the mentality of the Russian Mafia.. “I am professional criminal…”
Article here.
montag @
69
Glen’s a bit wierd, but, like Jesus, Elvis, and Marx, it’s his following that worries me.
Wigwam @ 72
If he weren’t on the air, he wouldn’t have a following–that’s why I included the bozo execs at CNN in that remark.
montag @ 69
But he comes across to the flea brains as someone who hates all politicians. So the dems must be really bad if he singles them out. It is his non partison schtick some will listen to. I saw many watching around airport teevees. He was not ignored. That is scary to me.
ReneND @ 74
Which sort of proves that a captive audience will watch anything on television. :)
Smash the remote and American males will even watch the Home Shopping Network 24/7…. :)
Rayne - I suspect all these guys are connected… that the lines dividing the FSB and the Russian mob and the rest of ‘em are not really there - same bunch o’ cats…
Hello, everyone. Be sure to tell me if you find this useful.
OldCoastie @ 77
I think this is partially true. There are factions within the Russian gov’t, the security services and the mob. The fissures break down over who supports who and who doesn’t. Berezhovsky, Khodorkovsky and others don’t support Putin and have paid the price.
The Khodorkovsky prosecution made very clear where the line was. I wouldn’t be so hasty to exclude Putin and (segments of) the FSB. This is a lot murkier than the murk that meets the eye.
Patrick 4/4 @ 79
it’s a very tiny sandbox…
OldCoastie @ 79
Anyone who doesn’t account for a bunch of guys with the initials, EM, CT, BP, OP, DS and the like isn’t seeing the big picture. Seeing this as just a Russian internal power play is just split-screen….
montag @ 81
I think they’re more than happy to buy from whoever comes out on top, but this looks like a supply-side dispute to me.
Patrick 4/4 @ 81
No. It’s not about being happy buying from whomever. It’s about getting control at the source, at the cheapest possible rate of extraction.
It’s never been about access. It’s been about maximum profit.
We’re fighting a war (at taxpayer expense) for oil at the cheapest price in Iraq now, with another war for same on the way. (Any doubt of that, look at reports of the current PSA deals contemplated by the Iraqis at the behest of the U.S. embassy.)
Anyone can buy on the spot market at the prevailing price. But, controlling the price at the wellhead is the aim. That way, the profit is determined by the spot minus the extraction cost.
Iraq, Iran, Russia, Nigeria, Venezuela, etc. All part of the plan.
Cheers.
Sheesh, TRex! I guess you want to give extinction another chance. Reading briefly through, I have newfound respect for montag and Rayne. I’d love to say why, but there are enough people after me already…….
Most interesting coverage of this yet here. Anybody have a good handle on cheap, high-quality Geiger counters?
Ed*ard Teller @ 83
Umm, maybe, here?
Looks like I’m late to the party.
Missed the 60 Minutes tonight, but from the excerpt above, doesn’t look like anything new.
Claims from the academic writing the book that L. supposedly bragged about his blackmail plans came out not too long after the poisoning. This could easily be disinformation, meant to throw investigators off the FSB trail.
Litvinenko was former KGB. He would’ve known that boasting of his plans to blackmail the Putin government was akin to signing his own death warrant. I have a real hard time buying this one.
OT: a chilling piece about the water woes that await California, “written” in 2062.
Salon.com stirs the pot with its main feature:
punaise @ 86
Those water woes are already upon you. They just aren’t apparent because of informal deals that sprouted up in the `30s and `40s.
Here’s a nice little related factoid. The amount of water passing the measuring instruments on the weir before the Colorado River water gets diverted to California is now smaller than during the Dust Bowl years of the `30s.
Big problems ahead….
R J Hillhouse @ 86
If Litvinenko actually said to her what she claims, he was someone harboring a deathwish. One doesn’t corner dangerous people and then brag about it while they are still at large.
montag @
89
good points. from the article I linked to:
Yup. And if you’re going to be an effective blackmailer, you need to keep quiet–that’s the whole point that you can be silenced for money or favors.
Spy who billed me in da house!
But if a blackmailer can simply be shut up, wouldn’t that make it as likely that he get offed as paid? Wouldn’t he have had something by way of insurance or a deadman switch?
Off topic but for anyone interested–Jane’s previous piece discussed Lord McCain’s WaPo op/ed calling for not only more troops, but lots more troops, not for a while but for a long time.
As of a few minutes ago, the WaPo was still accepting comments (which are running highly if not entirely negative):
http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....01810.html
HotFlash @ 93
Not if he weren’t smart enough. Any time you start blackmailing someone, you open yourself up to the authorities (in this case, the authorities of multiple countries). Many ways to be double- and triple-crossed.
My guess is that Litvinenko was a pawn in a much greater game who thought, without foundation, that he was a knight or a bishop.
Racking up them billable hours…
Not that I’ve ever blackmailed anyone, but it’s the threat of releasing something and talking about something that works. He might have wanted to use a 3rd party to “leak” that he had the real goods on the Putin government, but I’d expect a professional to do this much more subtlety through a “trusted” contact who would know how to evaluate the info, not a clueless grad student.
Dr. Hillhouse, I’ve been checking your blog on a regular basis, looking for updates on this case.
Do you have any?
This is all terra incognita to me, I don’t even read LeCarre. However, I’m pretty sure that the old cold-war stuff has not stopped, people *love* being spies and having secret wars too much.
Back when Bush 41 was pres I kept saying,, “Don’t you think it’s odd that the Pres of the US is the former head of the CIA and the pres of the Soviet Union is the former head of the KGB and they’d look at me like, huh? So, are they right? Is any of this stuff connected? Via Britain?
Hi Suzanne.
I been watching the case, but nothing really new has surfaced. The British investigators were blocked at every turn when in Moscow, just like you’d expect if the FSB/Putin government were behind it.
Tonight I was reading the latest in the Independent. They quote investigators as believing they will solve it, but the guilty will never be prosecuted.
The real question will be whether the British government will point fingers or, more likely, will be diplomatic and only implicate individuals without connecting the dots to the government.
Spies are necessary. We’d be forever at war without them and ambassadors.
My theory? It’s the RIAA, trying to frame AllOfMP3.com.
Margot @ 100
We are forever at war because of them.
I quote John Foster Dulles, a notable from our own State Dept.: “For us there are two sorts of people in the world: there are those who are Christians and support free enterprise and there are the others.”