
(Photo by AP Photo/Dennis Cook.)
I hope many of you got to see this on CSPAN, but if not, watch this first from Crooks and Liars, then read these extended excerpts from Nancy Pelosi on becoming the first woman Speaker of the House.
Rep. Nancy Pelosi's Remarks Upon Becoming Speaker of the House
PELOSI: Thank you, my colleagues. Thank you, Leader Boehner, Mr. Speaker.
I accept this gavel in the spirit of partnership, not partisanship, and I look forward to working… (APPLAUSE) I look forward to working with you, Mr. Boehner, and the Republicans in the Congress, for the good of the American people. After giving this gavel away in the first two — in the last two Congresses, I'm glad someone else has the honor today. (LAUGHTER)
In this House, we may be different parties, but we serve one country. And our pride and our prayers are united behind our men and women in uniform. (APPLAUSE) They are working together to protect the American people. And in this Congress, we must work together to build a future worthy of their sacrifice. (APPLAUSE)
In this hour, we need and pray for the character, courage and civility of a former member of this House: President Ford. He healed the country when it needed healing. This is another time, another war and another trial of our American will, imagination and spirit. Let us honor his memory not just in eulogy, but in dialogue and trust across the aisle. (APPLAUSE)
[snip] Forty-three years ago, Paul Pelosi and I were married. We raised our five children in San Francisco, where Paul was born and raised. I want to thank Paul and our five children — Nancy Corinne, Christine, Jacqueline, Paul Jr., and Alexandra — and our magnificent grandchildren — for their love, for their support, and the confidence they gave me to go from the kitchen to the Congress. (APPLAUSE)
And I thank my constituents in San Francisco, and for the state of California, for the privilege of representing them in Congress. Saint Francis of Assisi is our city's patron saint. And his "Song of Saint Francis" is our city's anthem: "Lord, make me a channel of thy peace; where there is darkness may we bring light, where there is hatred, may we bring love, where is despair, may we bring hope."
PELOSI: Hope: that is what America is about. And it is in that spirit that I serve in the Congress of the United States. (APPLAUSE)
And today, I thank my colleagues. By electing me speaker, you have brought us closer to the ideal of equality that is America's heritage and America's hope.
This is an historic moment. And I thank the leader for acknowledging it. Thank you, Mr. Boehner. It's an historic moment for the Congress. It's an historic moment for the women of America. (APPLAUSE) It is a moment for which we have waited over 200 years. Never losing faith, we waited through the many years of struggle to achieve our rights.
But women weren't just waiting; women were working. Never losing faith, we worked to redeem the promise of America, that all men and women are created equal. (APPLAUSE)
For our daughters and our granddaughters, today we have broken the marble ceiling. (APPLAUSE) For our daughters and our granddaughters now, the sky is the limit. Anything is possible for them.
[snip]
The election of 2006 was a call to change, not merely to change the control of Congress, but for a new direction for our country. Nowhere were the American people more clear about the need for a new direction than in the war in Iraq. (APPLAUSE) The American people rejected an open-ended obligation to a war without end.
Shortly, President Bush will address the nation on the subject of Iraq. It is the responsibility of the president to articulate a new plan for Iraq that makes it clear to the Iraqis that they must defend their own streets and their own security, a plan that promotes stability in the region and a plan that allows us to responsibly redeploy our troops. (APPLAUSE)
[snip]
PELOSI: Before we move forward — because there are so many children here and so many of them asked me if they could touch the gavel, I wanted to invite as many of them who wanted to come forward to come join me up here. I know my own grandchildren will. Let's hear it for the children. We're here for the children. (APPLAUSE) [Dozens of children come forward and crowd around Pelosi]
For all — for these children, our children and for all of America's children, the House will come to order. (APPLAUSE)
I'm now ready to take the oath of office from the dean of the Congress of the United States, Mr. Dingell. And in acknowledging him, I also want to acknowledge Speaker Foley, who has been with us, as well. (APPLAUSE)
Mr. DINGELL: The distinguished gentlewoman from California will please raise your right hand.
Do you solemnly swear that you will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic; and that you will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that you take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that you will faithfully and well discharge the duties of the office upon which you're about to enter, so help you God?
PELOSI: I do. (APPLAUSE)
Not much I can add to this, but WaPo and NYT have more.
Related posts:





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Fitz!
Good Morning.
Maybe I shouldn’t stop first to read the post.
I’m really looking forward to seeing what the new Speaker has to say. She certainly seems up for the job right now.
What a breath of fresh air she is!
-and she didn’t cry, but Boehner almost did, heh..
We watched her whole speech live yesterday.
HIGHLY recommended! ;->
She was great. Her delivery was poised, perfectly timed, and the children around her were a perfect tableau of family values. So Rush and all the other rightards can chew on that one for a while.
Kidz!
OT – BTW, broadband cards are very cool, and have allowed me to leave the tyranny of coffee shop wifi. Highly receommended.
twolf1
yer gonna make that guy cranky agin.
whatta you do, post, THEN send a little note downstairs just to tease?
as long as you live-blog like a crazy fool, we’ll follow you anywhere ;->
San Francisco Family Values!
Madame Speaker may not have cried, but I have.
My daughter can now reasonably expect to become Madame Speaker, too.
Hell, so can I.
230 years of waiting for yesterday’s moment, a nation that is supposed to be an example to others FINALLY and well behind many countries, swore in a female leader of its elected representatives.
Newt Gingrich plans on retaking the Speakership and being surrounded by all of his ex-wives and mistresses.
-GSD
Nancy Pelosi was masterful yesterday.
I think her performance over the next 12 to 18 months will have a significant impact on Hillary Clinton’s run for President in terms of the general public’s comfort level with having a woman in charge.
As I said yesterday, Speaker Pelosi was great. Charming, direct, poised, warm. All of the things that loser Dennis Hastert was not.
I pick Hastert out before April due to health reasons. He is just a miserable load now that he’s nobody.
-GSD
The symbolism of her act – surrounded my kids as she bangs the gavel for the first time – blows me away.
I hope we are wrong about the monster lurking in the DC miasma, waiting to snatch unsuspecting persons of integrity and turn them into newts.
Now we know where Time Magazine will get the money to pay their always wrong legacy Bill Kristol.
Layoffs for Time.
-GSD
you know what
with the presence this women has, if she’s able to achieve what we elected congress to achieve, she has a chance for the white house
Good morning gang.
TeddySanFran @ 10
Yeah, the pundits are going to have a tough time with that photo on the front page of the Times today.
I notice our President did everything he could to bury Nancy as the lede story. He was so busy, announcing appointments, moving players around on the field, and he’s busy today. The AP and Reuters news services are full of Bush. The WH must know that Nancy blew people away yesterday. Nice start, Dems.
I say that people should start tossing Speaker Pelosi’s name around when presidential polling comes around.
A twofer. For 2008 or when the impeachments knock out Chimpy and the Gimp.
-GSD
Hey scarecrow! How are you doing?
Please say hello to selise the next time you two are in touch.
Yesterday I was listening to an interview of Mitch McConnell on NPR. When the subject shifted to where the Senate stands on Iraq, he pointed to “Democrat” Lieberman’s hawkish views – in support of Bush. I truly felt sick to my stomach.
Oh, well. We did what we could to end the Republicans’ ability to use Lieberman as a shield. It was a worthy fight.
Adie @ 8
annoying automated response from twolf1: Yep, that’s what I do. ;) I will live-blog the chimp et al as often as I can. Sometimes work gets in the way though.
I had tears in my eyes all evening, watching her and listening to her and listening to people talk about the day. She’s so beautiful, and all those lovely kids around her, and all the happiness in the air… it’s the first time I’ve felt really hopeful in years now.
Hi dab. Expect Selise will be along soon. Lieberman may find himself increasingly isolated. In the meantime, Biden is claiming the Bush people know they’ve lost Iraq and are just trying to hide the fact until the next President comes along.
White House postponing loss of Iraq, Biden says
last night I took myself out for a little celebratory Pelosi dinner (had a little Italian HOUSE wine)… it was pretty early, I ate at the bar and had a nice chat with the young woman tending bar… she was unaware of the significance of Nancy becoming Speaker, but by the end of my meal, she thought she’d go see if she could find Madame Speaker’s speech online…
;-)
(dragging people to the light, one person at a time)
I’m also wondering if Redd will tell us if her trip to the courtroom makes her wonder if he’s sandbagging. After all the accolades to Fitz, I hate to say it, but I would have thought this investigation should have rendered more than just Libby, unless he’s just an idiot and the others are all geniouses. Why not Armitage, for instance. He is a former spy himself, yet he claims to just have loose lips, not evil intentions. Why should he get off so easily and without having to even hire a lawyer. Stephen Hadley reportedly thought he would be prosecuted, but no. What’s your feel.
THIS IS IS A quote from the previous thread that I thought was pretty inciteful. I never understood the hero worship Fitz has gotten on this board, the uncritical worship of him.
I lost my favorable view of him when he let Rove off the hook, AFTER FIRST LETTING HIM “EXPLAIN” ERR, “TESTILIE” 5 TIMES BEFORE THE GRAND JURY.
I’m just a dumb civil attorney but I’ve never heard of a person getting 5 changes to tell a grand jury the truth. Any criminal lawyers out there — can you tell me that this is normal?
Scarecrow @ 23
Never mind that more people die so they can try to avoid responsibility for those who have died already. Somebody really needs to burn the words “human decency” into a wooden baseball bat to whack these idiots with as they leave office.
OldCoastie, had a touch of some bug yesterday, spent the day flat on the couch, so I didn’t lift a glass to Madame Speaker, but now I can live vicariously through you. HOUSE wine, indeed. To Madame Speaker…
Everyone agrees that Clusterfuck’s “surge” won’t do a bit of good- and may even do harm- at the same time- he’s re-arranging the deck chairs at the Pentagon..Why?
Well he may still think he’s a partial owner of a losing baseball team.. When yer team is losing nightly- how do ya keep people coming out? Fire the manager and change the batting order- anything to make it look like you’ve done something revolutionary and that there’s hope again..
That’s all this cynical bullshit amounts to- creating false hope..
Cynical- faith based- son of a bitch.
Scarecrow @ 23
Wow. Sounds like Biden has figured out exactly how to frame the situation in Iraq. I’m surprised to hear it coming from him, but I certainly hope that this message spreads and other Democrats make this same point repeatedly.
It’s new puppy morning- we’re headed out to pick up our new goldendoodle Schnuffy. Lot’s of dog shit ahead!
Good morning all.
Coastie, I pointed out yesterday that anyone under the age of 40 or so doesn’t have the perspective to appreciate yesterday’s LollaPelosi. For them, Title IX has always existed. Women have always been able to get into medical schools, law schools and gradual [sic] schools.
I graduated from HS near the cusp of the change. Girls in my HS class were told they could be anything they wanted, as long as anything was chosen from the set {teacher, nurse, secretary, housewife}. Land grant universities had female ghettos called Colleges of Home Economics.
It’s different today. I had to explain to our 22 y.o. son why yesterday was important to Mrs BC.
They don’t get it, because they didn’t see the discrimination. All we old farts can do is teach them.
BC
CT VOTER @ 25
You are on the mark!
In the NY Times link cited by Scarecrow, note the election revisionism intended to boost Rahm’s reputation. Here’s the quote:
Representative Rahm Emanuel of Illinois, who engineered the election of 42 new Democrats to the House as leader of the party’s Congressional campaign committee, threw a huge reception at Johnny’s Half Shell across the street from the Capitol. Mrs. Pelosi was the host of a gala at the National Building Museum at which Mr. Bennett and Ms. King were scheduled to perform.
OT – ThinkProgress-
*xyz @ 29
Because Biden is afraid he will be the fall guy if he gets elected the next president, and has to order the helicopters on to the green zone roofs. Pre-CYA.
I have to say that I am impressed with this article about Biden. Here’s an exerpt for flavor.
‘Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said yesterday that he believes top officials in the Bush administration have privately concluded they have lost Iraq and are simply trying to postpone disaster so the next president will “be the guy landing helicopters inside the Green Zone, taking people off the roof,” in a chaotic withdrawal reminiscent of Vietnam.
“I have reached the tentative conclusion that a significant portion of this administration, maybe even including the vice president, believes Iraq is lost,” Biden said. “They have no answer to deal with how badly they have screwed it up. I am not being facetious now. Therefore, the best thing to do is keep it from totally collapsing on your watch and hand it off to the next guy — literally, not figuratively.”‘
I too have missed the heroism in Fitzy’s prosecution. Lettin Rove walk stunk- he deserved his day in court- an up or down vote- ya know- JUSTICE!
Re Biden’s newly found sanity, I wonder if Joe’s trouble this past November (costing him over $20 mil I heard) has put some cement in Biden’s spine. Just wondering…
The right has already started rabidly demonizing her, but I must say she was the epitome of grace, poise and strength of spirit.
But, boy oh boy, those Repubs. What a pile of sore losers and crybabies. Phil Gingrey (Mr. Butterfly McQueen) was especially obnoxious and spiteful. I have to ask, what happened to all the macho stuff, guys? Take it like a man! (With the exception of Gingrey, for obvious reasons.)
Shall we send them a box of passies and blankies?
*xyz @ 33
Gee, and here I thought most of the candidates Rahm actually backed got their asses kicked. I wish I could get credit like he does for working against the final outcome. No, wait, I don’t. That would injure my self-respect.
GrandmaJ @ 38
What amazes me is that even Biden is starting to “get it” about Iraq. But still, nothing from Hillary except some harsh questioning for Rumsfeld. I can’t believe her advisers think it is a good idea to hide from this issue the way she has.
jnfr @ 22
ME 2. Unexpected weeping. Completely blindsided by that. I guess it’s just now starting to sink in. And, yes, hope.
*xyz @
29
The most remarkable thing about the Biden link is that it is reported. That the media covered it.
(Edit for clarification: The Dems going to get a share of the media coverage now? That’s a positive development. We’ll see if it lasts.)
*xyz @ 41
I suspect that Biden is only leaning where the wind blows. Still, we can use him shamelessly and then leave the dried-up husk of his political career in a ditch somewhere.
Mommybrain @ 27
sorry you’re sick, Mommybrain… the restaurant I went to is in a very wealthy neighborhood with lots of oh-so-blonde-and-beautiful people and it is endlessly republican… so, I’m sure it is perfectly shocking to have an out Democrat sitting across the bar from you… tee hee!
you know, i’ve often said a false hope is better than no hope at all.
but pelosi feels like the bearer of the genuine article.
you’re right, i should make sure my daughter understands just why pelosi is so significant.
It’s not normal. And I’ve always thought that the only reason for it is that he is cooperating in some way. I still think that.
Regarding Biden’s comments. It is hard to figure why Chimpy is delaying all the decidering–I guess the deck chair rearrangering is taking some time what with all the ones who won’t sit down if it means sitting next to someone they don’t like, or whatever.
Or is it that he just is waiting for some more signs from God, like the Ford funeral fest in which this helicopter roof rescue-ation came to the fore–perhaps for the first time–to his beautiful mind–and he learnt how he might really dump this on the next President, sorta how Nixon escaped, but maybe without the resignation of the VP and the possible impeachments, etc.
Because maybe he’s heard about history repeating itself, and he just wants to wait for that to happen again. (You know the next part, about how great it is in Vietnam now.)
EvilDrPuma @ 40
EvilDrPuma,
The great thing is – this subtle NY Times revisionism doesn’t have the same power it once did. The narrative they try to impose is instantly picked apart.
By us.
Instantly, in real time.
rwcole @ 30
good luck! have fun! puppies are a pain, but oh, what an adventure!
*xyz @ 49
Just occurred to me, in addition to everything else. Why is bush picking a Navy admiral as commander? — Perhaps it is for Iran, and is linked to the now second boat steaming over to the middle east. Hmmmm.
*xyz — here, you can cram this at the NYT as well as Rahm:
15 Republicans squeaked by in 2006, analysis shows
You can shove it at that moron Begala, too; these races wouldn’t have been close without the help of the grassroots and the 50-State Strategy.
Frankly, we wouldn’t be celebrating a Democratic majority and Madame Speaker if we’d left it up to Rahm’s alleged genius and Begala’s expertise. If they’d have done a better job, those 15 races would have been tighter or outright won by grassroots Dem candidates. (One of them was Duckworth – millions of dollars invested in her race alone, while 14 other races came within 3 percent or less. Thanks a fricking lot, Rahm.)
Biden is always 20 steps behind the conventional wisdom yelling “Charge”.
-GSD
bg @ 48
he’s waiting for the carrier group to arrive in the Gulf off the coast of Iran.
twolf1 @ 34
Astonishing? The sad thing is that this has been the Administration’s policy with virtually every appointment.
GSD @ 54
which is his strength as a divining rod in this — if he gets it, it’s all over but the shouting.
dmg — if you have a son, explain the significance to him as well.
My nine-year-old son was actually more surprised and encouraged than my daughter was; he was shocked that no woman had ever had that role before, made me tear up even more at his response. At 13, my daughter is more aware and jaded; she knows it’s going to be a slog for her in spite of all the ground breaking, at least until there are no more firsts.
EPU @ 47
I’ve been told that as long as
youRove could describe it to the prosecutor and the jurors as a ‘correction’ of stuff already told them or as ‘additional information’, it’s not perjury. But IANAL.I’d still like to see him indicted, though.
GSD @ 54
Usually, this is true.
But this time, Biden appears to be out front (among politicians) in really pushing this new theme.
Obviously, it is Biden, so he will do something asinine next. But on this one, I give him credit.
Richmond @ 52
Listening to snippets of Diane Rehm this morning with her all right-wing panel, I think it was Byron York who commented on the same fact by saying that Iran was “about to become a big part of our lives.”
Great, another vanity war.
GSD @ 54
It’s nice that the “Charge” is getting covered now. That’s why I think the fact it got coverage is more important than what he had to say.
bg @ 48
Here’s a theme: stalemate in the Executive Branch. Preznit McFlightsuit wants Victory, but can’t find any generals who’ll promise him Victory, so he gets an Admiral to run our land-occupation in Iraq. He moves Darkbridge (Mr. DeathSquadSpy) over to State to keep an eye on the Shoe-Shopper; she’s straying off the reservation, looking for a soft landing back at Stanford. Meanwhile, the entire White House lawyers up, anticipating chronic DemChair crankiness when the Unitary “No Hill Testimony” Executive tune plays on.
The dynamic is changing, the Chimp is isolated and alone. GOP (Lott, etc.) won’t unswervingly back His Surge — calling for a defined mission and other inconvenient truths. By the time W States the Union, I wonder if the Congress will even applaud his entrance into The People’s House.
… oh, and:
Troops
Home
NOW
I recently noticed this Raw Story headline:
Iranian TV claims Iraq rushed Saddam’s execution in order to thwart alleged US escape plan: Developing…
Sic Semper Tyrannis.
Col. Pat Lang has an interesting take on the appointment of Fallon at Centcom.
Go here.
Also, read the Walrus’ take on the neo-con strategery for the new American century. A few posts down.
-GSD
I simply cannot believe that W will have another invasion. . .it defies everything. If this happens, I will lose all hope.
I did see one of the congresscritters yesterday saying W is the Commander in Chief and they will not cut off funds. . .so it could happen.
But no one can think we can surge and hit Iran both. NFW.
I read somewhere in the great vast toobz that as Israel (AIPAC) gins for a strike against Iran, if Bush is too weakened to do it, they are betting that a Prez. Hillary will do it.
She wants to be a hawk – because CW says that a woman has to be twice as tough as a man. This a.m. everyone was speculating about why Hillary was so silent on Iraq. One idea was she was letting the wind carry the argument and she will chime in when the final result is more certain.
P/A,
I do agree.
Biden, timid that he is, is a good speaker and an effective communicator. That he is getting this message out is a good thing.
-GSD
Succesfully crashed Lieberman’s victory hoe-down last night –
Party Crashing
Can you say DINO? I knew that you could:
Now on C-Span2, if you have a stong stomach…….
AEI panel w/McCain & Liar. Kean & Kegan on previously.
Lou Costello @ 70
Yup, Boyda has a cough (hack…hack…). But nobody else is under any obligation to agree with her that Congress is a rubber stamp for POTUS’s military decisions.
GrandmaJ @ 67
U got it!
I have a hard time believing she will be any good at her job. She wasn’t in the last one. I hope I’m wrong, but she’s in over her head.
OT: what if congress were to REVOKE its authorization for invasion of Iraq.
.
Hillary is waiting for the precise epiphany moment to declare she has seen the light. She will then try to lead the movement out of the disaster that she led us in with JoMo.
The odd thing about the beginning of Pelosi’s address was about the “troops protecting America…” This is hardly the truth and it is always framed like that. America is not under attack and does not need THAT type of protection.
Can we demilitarize this country and focus on what the people need instead of all these mythological enemy threats off shore. NO NATION is coming to take america from you!
Lieberman is sliming up my teevee screen. Thanks CT.
pluege @ 75
-A little like closing the barn door after the cows get out… if you follow. But, I don’t have any great ideas. Holding up funds probably wouldn’t work either. My thinking in part is that this call for an Iraq surge is mainly to get troops for an Iran invasion, so that they can leave Iraq smoldering, and get the Red-White-Blue MSM to celebrate a new military campaign drive. The plan to “retake” Baghdad is another “see the shiny thong” (as we say here now at FDL.
pluege @
75
Senator John Warner (R-VA) was making noises at the end of the 109th that there’d be a need for a new AUMF for the new mission in Iraq, whatever that may be, the situation having evolved beyond what Congress approved prior to the 2002 elections.
Via Froomkin, Michael Duffy of Time:
Scarecrow @ 18
taking a cue from steinbrenner it seems, whenever there is sports news he breaks his own story
works for the george with an “s”, didn’t work for the other george though
Glorfindel @ 77
the boundarys are not knowable if we were to discuss my contempt for this man
pluege @ 75
I think it’s within their protocol to revoke his war powers
the time to revoke those were realized years ago, let’s get the ball rolling now
Howie Kurtz gives Christy Hardin Smith a shout this morning!
Liebervenom says the Iraqi people think we can win there. He knows because he talked to them.
Hugh @ 80
I’m hoping congress obliges that desire…talk about working with the president, man they could help him out of office in a hurry if they want
It looks like Bush is down to Pickles and Barney for his “Purge and Surge” plan of purging dissenting generals and surging US troop deaths.
He’s even lost Ollie North.
-GSD
PJ Evans – Perhaps on the second trip to the GJ that is true; 5 trips to “correct,” not so much. And even then the prosecutor (and the GJ) would have to believe the correction was a correction. All we can do is speculate, and my speculation is that 5 appearances to “correct” = cooperation (at what level the cooperation is another question). If he truthfully told all in exchange for not being prosecuted (and whether there is any paperwork on that) is more speculation; but I don’t see him walking otherwise.
pluege & Richmond — had been thinking about that, trying to draft a missive to send to Sen. Levin.
I believe there needs to be a REVISION to the AUMF, that specifically prohibits any military action in countries other than Iraq and Afghanistan. The revision should also limit any military funding already released and pending/future funding to specific purposes that do not include any preemptive efforts towards Iran or any other country.
Further, amendments to bills providing funding to the military that have already been submitted and/or passed should be submitted, modifying the terms under which spending is authorized. No monies should be spent on military build up directed at any new targets, including Iran, without express consent of Congress; only in the case of a provocative, direct attack upon U.S. assets will any further authorization be considered.
These motherf*ckers are preparing launch another preemptive assault on Iran — and we are going to have to be preemptive in our efforts to stop it.
GSD @ 87
Let’s stick to the facts here. I haven’t actually heard any public statement of Barney’s position on this.
McCain & the Liar now taking questions on C-Span2.
Rep. Pelosi and Sen. Reid have sent a letter to Pres. Chimpy…NO TROOP SURGE!
Scariest W personnel shuffle: putting an Admiral in charge of CentCom. There must be a reason for this. Iraq ain’t the reason. I’m betting the Navy wants its war, now, in the Straits.
perris @ 83
The AUMF Iraq was a joint resolution. Such a resolution requires simple majorities in both houses on an identical text. The ultimate problem for passing a rescinding joint resolution can be summed up in two words: Joseph Lieberman.
Gang, a lot of the conversation has moved to Iraq, so I’ll put up a new post on that topic in a few minutes. I just didn’t want Nancy Pelosi’s first day to go unnoticed. It was a great beginning.
See you upstairs about 1:00 p.m. eastern.
EvilDrPuma @ 90
LOL. sort of snort, chuckling. My computer is now wiped clean of yesterday’s FDL caused spilt coffee. Be careful. No more! :-)
But Hugh, won’t Collins jump on the AUMF Joint re-consideration? Her Baghdad trip seemed to yield different results than RGJoe’s, although they travelled together….
TeddySanFran @ 93
yup.
Scarecrow @ 95
Thousands of FDLers refreshing like crazy in hopes of a Zed!
TeddySanFran @ 97
Collins will be interesting to watch. I think she may be in trouble in Maine if she doesn’t seriously shift positions. But she and Lieberlier are pretty tight, and she always caves in favor of the admin.
In today’s Salon, Joe Conason said Pelosi has no reason to make nice:
Teddy – I’m not sure it’s so much the Navy that’s pushing it, Bush just needed to find some more compliant military to do the dirty deed… the other appointment that troubles me is the Navy spook going into Negroponte’s old job…
Hugh @ 94
it’s deal making time
there are republicans that are dying to throw this president under the bus
“LET’S MAKE A DEAL”!!!
Scarecrow @ 95
Very few blogs have celebrated appropriately, scarecrow, so I appreciate this post mightily. America, please use our Congresswoman gently — we San Franciscans give up our representation in hopes of a new day and new leadership for the Republic!
…oh, and:
Troops
Home
NOW
PS 822 signups for Beach Impeach Project tomorrow at 10:30 at Ocean Beach on the Great Highway! Be there, Baypups!
Hugh (94) — Bet you there’s a rebuttal to Joe Lieberman in the form of Chuck Hagel and Dick Lugar.
Rayne @ 105
I gotta wonder if Durbin’s doing a quiet whipcount on reconsideration of the AUMF, with Warner along for the ride. This could happen, and quickly, either before or after Chimp’s Big “Sacrifice” Address to a Compliant Nation.
Now I know why Negroponte is moving to State, so Condi can coach the Steelers.
New Thread
Re: this article from the NY Times, I just sent an e-mail to Mr. Broder taking issue with the part about Emanuel being the engineer of the Democratic victory in Congress:
I just finished reading your article entitled “Jubilant Democrats Assume Control on Capitol Hill”, and I have a comment to make regarding the following excerpt from your article:
“Representative Rahm Emanuel of Illinois, who engineered the election of 42 new Democrats to the House as leader of the party’s Congressional campaign committee, threw a huge reception at Johnny’s Half Shell across the street from the Capitol. Mrs. Pelosi was the host of a gala at the National Building Museum at which Mr. Bennett and Ms. King were scheduled to perform.”
I think that this is nothing more than spin, as Mr. Emanuel is considered by many Democrats outside of Washington as part of the old Daley machine and, therefore, untrustworthy. I believe that if Mr. Emanuel had had his way, the Democrats would still be in the minority in Congress. He did NOT engineer the election of 42 Democrats to Congress, and if you look at the numbers, you will find that he lost more than he won.
Mr. Emanuel is trying to nip to the head of this parade and claim “leadership”. The Democratic victory in the 2006 elections was more of a cooperative effort from many sources and a groundswell of citizens getting involved in the elections due to disgust at the direction in which this country is headed.
Will you please at least look into this with an eye towards the truth rather than stenography? Just because Rahm Emanuel says it, doesn’t make it so.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
yesterday was a great day for americans and it was great to have a woman at the focal point of the day. i really like the tone she set. i believe that nancy pelosi can bring this nation together. amen.
“For the children”? Uh oh, I don’t think Bill Maher is going to like that.
I love the split screen shot where you see Pelosi on the left and that fat tub of shit Hassert in the back rows with his jerk off cronies on the right.
When I’m sworn in some day, I hope the dean of the congress will have the good sense to leave out the “so help you God.” ;-) I recognize no authority above the Constitution.
I know the conversation’s moved on, but I just had to add my bit.
Speaker Pelosi was perfect yesterday.
Inviting the children up to the dais was one thing-great, but any savvy political mind might have come up with that one. After all, it occurred to Tom Reynolds.
But each of those children got a chance to touch the Speaker’s gavel for a moment-a more perfect visual metaphor for the purpose of government and reminder of the source of government’s power is hard to imagine.
Time for a little more civics in our politics.
And, Anna did a writeup of the significance of Speaker Pelosi at Texas Kaos, which I’ve no qualms about pimping because it’s gorgeous writing.
Stephen Parrish, CPA @ 64
Saw it too and the first thing I thought of was a blown attempt at another false flag. Sadaam “escapes”, public supports the “surge” and Jr keeps his war long enough to go after the ultimate prize- war with Iran and Syria. They are certifiably insane and I can’t help but think there’s some merit to the story. They can’t build the mideast pipeline through Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq and Iran if they are forced to redeploy. Something has to happen quick to keep this going….
CT VOTER @ 25
I’m just a romance author, but I guess I’m wondering why you would think that having Rove available for testimony in the Libby case was unimportant. I have no idea if Mr. Rove will be called in that matter, but if I am not mistaken, if Rove is under indictment, he’s unavailable for testimony.
-S
Sorry, as childfree American, I’m tired of people with children getting every break while at the same time having to cover for parents at work.
It’s time parents step up to the plate and take responsibility for their choices.
You breed ‘em, you feed ‘em. NMFP.
Not sorry.
Librarian @
111
Bill Maher won’t, and I didn’t either. Parents need to take 100 percent of the responsibility for their choices. Unless, of courser, i can tell you to learn to dfiscipline them. And I think I know how much parents would like that.
Two things: I have seven children and a bountiful crop of grandbrats, and I love them all to death. But “for the children” pissed me off.
I would have preferred something along the lines of “for the Republic, and for the Constitution” – but “for the children”? I think Oliphant wonderfully captures it in today’s cartoon.
Two: the comments about Fitz and the results of his investigation are spot on. John Dean very early on showed how indictments could have been brought based on the original focus of the investigation, the outing of Valerie Plane.
I practiced quite a bit of heavy duty federal criminal law back in the day, and I too thought the 5 strikes you’re not out deal with Rove was beyond the pale. But what the hey, I’m just an outof touch grumpy old man.