<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh Yeah.  It&#8217;s January.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/03/oh-yeah-its-january/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/03/oh-yeah-its-january/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:23:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldtree</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/03/oh-yeah-its-january/#comment-441850</link>
		<dc:creator>oldtree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 06:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/03/oh-yeah-its-january/#comment-441850</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;we have a very small window in time to get universal health care, paper ballots,  taxes on the very rich,  accounting based on fact vs. fantasy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;we need to remember what the victory bought,   and use it wisely&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we have a very small window in time to get universal health care, paper ballots,  taxes on the very rich,  accounting based on fact vs. fantasy</p>
<p>we need to remember what the victory bought,   and use it wisely</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Hayden</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/03/oh-yeah-its-january/#comment-441424</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 00:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/03/oh-yeah-its-january/#comment-441424</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reachm.com/amstreet/archives/2007/01/03/how-is-a-reasonably-intelligent-adult-gonna-utilize-a-prescription-like-this/&quot;&gt;The New Way Highway: under deconstruction.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.reachm.com/amstreet/archives/2007/01/03/how-is-a-reasonably-intelligent-adult-gonna-utilize-a-prescription-like-this/">The New Way Highway: under deconstruction.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minor Ripper</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/03/oh-yeah-its-january/#comment-441348</link>
		<dc:creator>Minor Ripper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/03/oh-yeah-its-january/#comment-441348</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If Bush wrote that editorial in the WSJ today, then I’m a monkey’s uncle—way too many big words for his pea-brain to have used.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.minor-ripper.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;www.minor-ripper.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Bush wrote that editorial in the WSJ today, then I’m a monkey’s uncle—way too many big words for his pea-brain to have used.  <a href="http://www.minor-ripper.blogspot.com">http://www.minor-ripper.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swoosh</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/03/oh-yeah-its-january/#comment-441338</link>
		<dc:creator>Swoosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/03/oh-yeah-its-january/#comment-441338</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;ET @ 44:  In the same vein as Ellison’s use of Jefferson’s copy of the Koran for swearing-in, the Boston Globe today reported that Deval Patrick, the incoming Governor of Massachusetts, will be sworn in with his hand on the Bible presented to John Quincy Adams by those whom he defended in the slave ship AMISTAD mutiny trial.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ET @ 44:  In the same vein as Ellison’s use of Jefferson’s copy of the Koran for swearing-in, the Boston Globe today reported that Deval Patrick, the incoming Governor of Massachusetts, will be sworn in with his hand on the Bible presented to John Quincy Adams by those whom he defended in the slave ship AMISTAD mutiny trial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badwater</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/03/oh-yeah-its-january/#comment-441129</link>
		<dc:creator>Badwater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 19:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/03/oh-yeah-its-january/#comment-441129</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-441100&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Bargain Countertenor @ 180 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-441082&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Blub @ 176&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh sorry, thanks. I had forgotten that.. well, hopefully this Congress will be less willing to be do that… I would hate to see b43 get one iota more power than he has already claimed…
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I doubt a line-item spending veto is in the cards.  The Supremes made it pretty clear that it is a constitutional issue, so it will require an amendment.  Ain’t happening in time for the Shrub to use.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BC&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For Republicans, the line item veto is an issue only for elections, not for real.  They do not want a line item veto to exist.  They believe that their base won’t even remember that they already tried it.  They just want to trot it out, election after election, to heat up their base.  Abortion is a similar issue.  They have had complete control of government for many years.  Bush has been a bill signing machine.  They could have easily banned all abortions.  Yet, they did not.  To Republicans, abortion is an issue to be used, not to be solved.  They are just fortunate that their base never notices that they don’t do anything but talk.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-441100"><em>Bargain Countertenor @ 180 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-441082"><em>Blub @ 176</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Oh sorry, thanks. I had forgotten that.. well, hopefully this Congress will be less willing to be do that… I would hate to see b43 get one iota more power than he has already claimed…
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I doubt a line-item spending veto is in the cards.  The Supremes made it pretty clear that it is a constitutional issue, so it will require an amendment.  Ain’t happening in time for the Shrub to use.</p>
<p>BC</p>
</blockquote>
<p>For Republicans, the line item veto is an issue only for elections, not for real.  They do not want a line item veto to exist.  They believe that their base won’t even remember that they already tried it.  They just want to trot it out, election after election, to heat up their base.  Abortion is a similar issue.  They have had complete control of government for many years.  Bush has been a bill signing machine.  They could have easily banned all abortions.  Yet, they did not.  To Republicans, abortion is an issue to be used, not to be solved.  They are just fortunate that their base never notices that they don’t do anything but talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P J Evans</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/03/oh-yeah-its-january/#comment-441116</link>
		<dc:creator>P J Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 19:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/03/oh-yeah-its-january/#comment-441116</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Pectopah @ 179&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It should be news &lt;em&gt;here&lt;/em&gt; at least, because he’s the Treasury Secretary and does have official duties of &lt;em&gt;some&lt;/em&gt; kind.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don’t think it can be hidden for much longer, if it is true. Someone will talk, or he’ll have to appear at a meeting, and the whole thing will blow up one or another way.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pectopah @ 179</p>
<p>It should be news <em>here</em> at least, because he’s the Treasury Secretary and does have official duties of <em>some</em> kind.</p>
<p>I don’t think it can be hidden for much longer, if it is true. Someone will talk, or he’ll have to appear at a meeting, and the whole thing will blow up one or another way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bargain Countertenor</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/03/oh-yeah-its-january/#comment-441100</link>
		<dc:creator>Bargain Countertenor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/03/oh-yeah-its-january/#comment-441100</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-441082&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Blub @ 176&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh sorry, thanks. I had forgotten that.. well, hopefully this Congress will be less willing to be do that… I would hate to see b43 get one iota more power than he has already claimed…
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I doubt a line-item spending veto is in the cards.  The Supremes made it pretty clear that it is a constitutional issue, so it will require an amendment.  Ain’t happening in time for the Shrub to use.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BC&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-441082"><em>Blub @ 176</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Oh sorry, thanks. I had forgotten that.. well, hopefully this Congress will be less willing to be do that… I would hate to see b43 get one iota more power than he has already claimed…
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I doubt a line-item spending veto is in the cards.  The Supremes made it pretty clear that it is a constitutional issue, so it will require an amendment.  Ain’t happening in time for the Shrub to use.</p>
<p>BC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pectopah</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/03/oh-yeah-its-january/#comment-441094</link>
		<dc:creator>Pectopah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/03/oh-yeah-its-january/#comment-441094</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-441036&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;P J evans @ 137 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I’d say that if a cabinet officer was arrested that it would be Big News. In another country, especially in Europe, Very Big News. I don’t thnk it could be hidden for a day, let alone two weeks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Mods: did I use the ‘wrong’ mail address?)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;[Mod Note; it sure looks like it.]&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unlike the US, when a person is arrested in Germany, their identity is kept secret. At most you will get a statement that a Johan K. was arrested. Not more. They do not parade suspects before cameras and the press like we tend to. So it is possible such an arrest could happen, without it being news for 10 days. The alledged arrest occurred just before or on Christmas. They point to a source that claims seven sources. It also makes mention of sending him to the International Court. If true, I wonder what Bush and Angelika will be discussing today.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-441036"><em>P J evans @ 137 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>I’d say that if a cabinet officer was arrested that it would be Big News. In another country, especially in Europe, Very Big News. I don’t thnk it could be hidden for a day, let alone two weeks.</p>
<p>(Mods: did I use the ‘wrong’ mail address?)</p>
<p><em>[Mod Note; it sure looks like it.]</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Unlike the US, when a person is arrested in Germany, their identity is kept secret. At most you will get a statement that a Johan K. was arrested. Not more. They do not parade suspects before cameras and the press like we tend to. So it is possible such an arrest could happen, without it being news for 10 days. The alledged arrest occurred just before or on Christmas. They point to a source that claims seven sources. It also makes mention of sending him to the International Court. If true, I wonder what Bush and Angelika will be discussing today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayne</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/03/oh-yeah-its-january/#comment-441090</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/03/oh-yeah-its-january/#comment-441090</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh Richmond, I hear you.  I should be coding on a website myself.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Suffice it to say that there’s a LOT of dirt out there on Jebbie that would give Repugs pause.  He’s no angel, is at least as bad as George and Neil.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And now we need to get back to work.  ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Richmond, I hear you.  I should be coding on a website myself.</p>
<p>Suffice it to say that there’s a LOT of dirt out there on Jebbie that would give Repugs pause.  He’s no angel, is at least as bad as George and Neil.</p>
<p>And now we need to get back to work.  ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mandrake</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/03/oh-yeah-its-january/#comment-441087</link>
		<dc:creator>mandrake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/03/oh-yeah-its-january/#comment-441087</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-440972&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;jayackroyd @ 81 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ellison is freakin’ brilliant. He has handled this potentially incendiary issue with an enormously sophisticated message, that is also very clear and very direct.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BTW, he also slips past a potential Islamic objection by using a translation. Muslims who would object to the Koran being used in this fashion would not regard an English translation as  a copy of the true Koran.  The word of God cannot be translated, only transcribed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Choosing Jefferson’s copy is a beautiful, symbolic and pointed gesture about the nature of the Constitution and the intentions of the Founders.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I hope he can find the time to post at dKos or even over here on a Sunday chat.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The guy is a perfect foil for Goode.  He’s got class.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-440972"><em>jayackroyd @ 81 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Ellison is freakin’ brilliant. He has handled this potentially incendiary issue with an enormously sophisticated message, that is also very clear and very direct.</p>
<p>BTW, he also slips past a potential Islamic objection by using a translation. Muslims who would object to the Koran being used in this fashion would not regard an English translation as  a copy of the true Koran.  The word of God cannot be translated, only transcribed.</p>
<p>Choosing Jefferson’s copy is a beautiful, symbolic and pointed gesture about the nature of the Constitution and the intentions of the Founders.</p>
<p>I hope he can find the time to post at dKos or even over here on a Sunday chat.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The guy is a perfect foil for Goode.  He’s got class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.219 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-15 14:28:47 -->

