<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not Just A Number</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/01/not-just-a-number/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/01/not-just-a-number/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:21:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vietnam Veterans - Vietnam Veterans &#187; Research links postwar trauma to future heart disease (Boston Globe)</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/01/not-just-a-number/#comment-439487</link>
		<dc:creator>Vietnam Veterans - Vietnam Veterans &#187; Research links postwar trauma to future heart disease (Boston Globe)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 09:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/01/not-just-a-number/#comment-439487</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[…] — more — […]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] — more — […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mandrake</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/01/not-just-a-number/#comment-438923</link>
		<dc:creator>mandrake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/01/not-just-a-number/#comment-438923</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ya’ know, I’m just so glad to see Russ Feingold finally get some damned credit, I had to share this!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?pid=152347&quot;&gt;http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?pid=152347&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya’ know, I’m just so glad to see Russ Feingold finally get some damned credit, I had to share this!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?pid=152347">http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?pid=152347</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dead last</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/01/not-just-a-number/#comment-438905</link>
		<dc:creator>dead last</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 21:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/01/not-just-a-number/#comment-438905</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;3,000 Dead Soldiers&lt;br /&gt;
3,000 Flags (very patriotic)&lt;br /&gt;
3,000 Flower Arraignments&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Maybe this is what Bush/Cheney/Rummy meant when they said we would be greeted by flowers. It reminds me of the stories NYC children told of the birds flying out of the towers on September 11th. Under questioning, the children admitted that they knew the birds were really people. Will the child Bush ever admit the flowers we were greeted with were funeral arrangements?)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3,000 Dead Soldiers<br />
3,000 Flags (very patriotic)<br />
3,000 Flower Arraignments</p>
<p>(Maybe this is what Bush/Cheney/Rummy meant when they said we would be greeted by flowers. It reminds me of the stories NYC children told of the birds flying out of the towers on September 11th. Under questioning, the children admitted that they knew the birds were really people. Will the child Bush ever admit the flowers we were greeted with were funeral arrangements?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fahrender</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/01/not-just-a-number/#comment-438888</link>
		<dc:creator>fahrender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 21:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/01/not-just-a-number/#comment-438888</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-438834&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Christy Hardin Smith @&lt;br /&gt;
                106              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;And to be clear, I’m not saying that Strauss was correct in all of his thinking — but I do find it beneficial to look at an issue or a theory from a myriad of sides.  And I occasionally do pull out a Straussian text to counterbalance something I’m reading and can find it very useful.  The point being that everyone has to work toward their own truth — really work — and not just use the information in front of them as a series of props that can be picked through at random to prop up the play scenery.  That gets us right back to the cave allegory in The Republic, which is where I sometimes feel far too many folks get mired and never bother to emerge.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;yeah, you are sooo right. nobody has it all down. like science itself, seeking something which is more true than what we think we know now. meanwhile, we keep kicking fuckwad’s arse!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-438834"><em>Christy Hardin Smith @<br />
                106              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>And to be clear, I’m not saying that Strauss was correct in all of his thinking — but I do find it beneficial to look at an issue or a theory from a myriad of sides.  And I occasionally do pull out a Straussian text to counterbalance something I’m reading and can find it very useful.  The point being that everyone has to work toward their own truth — really work — and not just use the information in front of them as a series of props that can be picked through at random to prop up the play scenery.  That gets us right back to the cave allegory in The Republic, which is where I sometimes feel far too many folks get mired and never bother to emerge.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>yeah, you are sooo right. nobody has it all down. like science itself, seeking something which is more true than what we think we know now. meanwhile, we keep kicking fuckwad’s arse!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Heretik : Just Ridiculous Update</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/01/not-just-a-number/#comment-438880</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heretik : Just Ridiculous Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 21:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/01/not-just-a-number/#comment-438880</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[…] Three thousand is just a number? A number of people are just sick of the trend. The number can never get smaller, only larger. All the people who went apocalyptic on Saddam are now decidedly apoplectic. The tyrant, the dictator, Evil Itself TM is no more, but still there is death. The pretty picture presented as the future has more than a few bloody smudges. But it’s not supporters of the war’s fault. […]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Three thousand is just a number? A number of people are just sick of the trend. The number can never get smaller, only larger. All the people who went apocalyptic on Saddam are now decidedly apoplectic. The tyrant, the dictator, Evil Itself TM is no more, but still there is death. The pretty picture presented as the future has more than a few bloody smudges. But it’s not supporters of the war’s fault. […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Christal</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/01/not-just-a-number/#comment-438853</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Christal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 20:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/01/not-just-a-number/#comment-438853</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;“We must face the fact that the United States is neither omnipotent or omniscient — that we are only 6 percent of the world’s population; that we cannot impose our will upon the other 94 percent of mankind..”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Actually, using the US and World population clocks at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.census.gov&quot;&gt;http://www.census.gov&lt;/a&gt; I find that we are 4.58% of the world’s population. And we use 25% of the world’s resources. This is grotesque, and the ultimate source of our wars–to maintain this hoggish lifestyle. We need to join the rest of the world in finding a way to right life on our only planet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“We must face the fact that the United States is neither omnipotent or omniscient — that we are only 6 percent of the world’s population; that we cannot impose our will upon the other 94 percent of mankind..”</p>
<p>Actually, using the US and World population clocks at <a href="http://www.census.gov">http://www.census.gov</a> I find that we are 4.58% of the world’s population. And we use 25% of the world’s resources. This is grotesque, and the ultimate source of our wars–to maintain this hoggish lifestyle. We need to join the rest of the world in finding a way to right life on our only planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rumi</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/01/not-just-a-number/#comment-438841</link>
		<dc:creator>rumi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 20:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/01/not-just-a-number/#comment-438841</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-438786&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Cujo359 @&lt;br /&gt;
                95              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-438683&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;looseheadprop @ 11              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;3,000. Wasn’t that the estimate of how many we lost on 9-11? So now Bush has killed more Americans than Osama?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think we really passed 3,000 some time ago. As others have noted, this toll doesn’t include all “out of theater” deaths. It doesn’t include the deaths of contract personnel, many of whom are Americans. It also doesn’t include “non-combat” deaths, accidents, disease, that sort of thing, which are more numerous because when you’re in a dangerous environment already these things happen more often.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  Do you remember one of the first curious deaths when (MS)NBC’s David Bloom died as he was reporting on extremely toxic chemical levels in either the Tigris or Euphrates?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-438786"><em>Cujo359 @<br />
                95              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-438683"><em>looseheadprop @ 11              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>3,000. Wasn’t that the estimate of how many we lost on 9-11? So now Bush has killed more Americans than Osama?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think we really passed 3,000 some time ago. As others have noted, this toll doesn’t include all “out of theater” deaths. It doesn’t include the deaths of contract personnel, many of whom are Americans. It also doesn’t include “non-combat” deaths, accidents, disease, that sort of thing, which are more numerous because when you’re in a dangerous environment already these things happen more often.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>  Do you remember one of the first curious deaths when (MS)NBC’s David Bloom died as he was reporting on extremely toxic chemical levels in either the Tigris or Euphrates?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Hardin Smith</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/01/not-just-a-number/#comment-438834</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Hardin Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 19:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/01/not-just-a-number/#comment-438834</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;And to be clear, I’m not saying that Strauss was correct in all of his thinking — but I do find it beneficial to look at an issue or a theory from a myriad of sides.  And I occasionally do pull out a Straussian text to counterbalance something I’m reading and can find it very useful.  The point being that everyone has to work toward their own truth — really work — and not just use the information in front of them as a series of props that can be picked through at random to prop up the play scenery.  That gets us right back to the cave allegory in The Republic, which is where I sometimes feel far too many folks get mired and never bother to emerge.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And to be clear, I’m not saying that Strauss was correct in all of his thinking — but I do find it beneficial to look at an issue or a theory from a myriad of sides.  And I occasionally do pull out a Straussian text to counterbalance something I’m reading and can find it very useful.  The point being that everyone has to work toward their own truth — really work — and not just use the information in front of them as a series of props that can be picked through at random to prop up the play scenery.  That gets us right back to the cave allegory in The Republic, which is where I sometimes feel far too many folks get mired and never bother to emerge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Hardin Smith</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/01/not-just-a-number/#comment-438831</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Hardin Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 19:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/01/not-just-a-number/#comment-438831</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;fahrender at 103 — I studied with a professor who had studied under Strauss at the UofChicago for his graduate work — the very same Strauss that all of the neocons claim as their forefather of thought.  And his interpretations of Plato and Nietzsche and many other political philosophy strains was not remotely lockstep with what Wolfowitz and the neocons have put forth as Straussian philosophy.  I think they have done with the work of Strauss and the reading of all the great philosophers what they have done with every other piece of information that has come across their paths:  cherry-picked those bits which affirmed their own worldview, and ignored or attempted to discredit the rest, regardless of its solidity of foundation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which is to say, again, they lie to themselves as much as they lie to the rest of us.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the professor that I had was very much the Socratic method sort of prof — and demanded that we rigorously be able to not only pick through all sides of an argument, but that we be prepared to stand up for our end of things as well and to look at its weaknesses from all sides.  He and Alan Bloom had regular phone calls wherein they haggled various philosophical bits and pieces, and he never stopped asking questions which, to me, is the point of philosophical examination.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fahrender at 103 — I studied with a professor who had studied under Strauss at the UofChicago for his graduate work — the very same Strauss that all of the neocons claim as their forefather of thought.  And his interpretations of Plato and Nietzsche and many other political philosophy strains was not remotely lockstep with what Wolfowitz and the neocons have put forth as Straussian philosophy.  I think they have done with the work of Strauss and the reading of all the great philosophers what they have done with every other piece of information that has come across their paths:  cherry-picked those bits which affirmed their own worldview, and ignored or attempted to discredit the rest, regardless of its solidity of foundation.</p>
<p>Which is to say, again, they lie to themselves as much as they lie to the rest of us.</p>
<p>But the professor that I had was very much the Socratic method sort of prof — and demanded that we rigorously be able to not only pick through all sides of an argument, but that we be prepared to stand up for our end of things as well and to look at its weaknesses from all sides.  He and Alan Bloom had regular phone calls wherein they haggled various philosophical bits and pieces, and he never stopped asking questions which, to me, is the point of philosophical examination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fahrender</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/01/01/not-just-a-number/#comment-438829</link>
		<dc:creator>fahrender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 19:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/01/not-just-a-number/#comment-438829</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-438818&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Rayne @ 102&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stephen Parrish — good question, to which I honestly don’t know the answer.  I suspect you do…?  I think that John Kennedy absolutely did have a tremendous role in writing his own speeches, and his brother surely wrote most of his own.  MLK certainly wrote his.  Of FDR I am uncertain — but I am confident that all of these figures KNEW, fully grasped the content of their speeches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don’t know about Carter, but I suspect he would never read anything out loud to which he could not subscribe.  Ditto Johnson, just because he was an ornery cuss who would not be caught dead in a situation where he could not back what came out of his mouth (hence his response to feedback from the infamous Daisy ad).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kathryn in MA — that’s an unsolicited recommendation if both Trials and Earth in Balance never returned.  Heh.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fahrender — I think the other point we are missing about fascist/not fascist is that the governments of the Mediterranean were hardly what we Americans would recognize as democratic today, as evidenced by the lack of an appeals process and the immediacy of punishment following Socrates’ sentencing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rayne,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;agreed. ironic how this description echoes that of what happened last weekend.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-438818"><em>Rayne @ 102</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Stephen Parrish — good question, to which I honestly don’t know the answer.  I suspect you do…?  I think that John Kennedy absolutely did have a tremendous role in writing his own speeches, and his brother surely wrote most of his own.  MLK certainly wrote his.  Of FDR I am uncertain — but I am confident that all of these figures KNEW, fully grasped the content of their speeches.</p>
<p>I don’t know about Carter, but I suspect he would never read anything out loud to which he could not subscribe.  Ditto Johnson, just because he was an ornery cuss who would not be caught dead in a situation where he could not back what came out of his mouth (hence his response to feedback from the infamous Daisy ad).</p>
<p>Kathryn in MA — that’s an unsolicited recommendation if both Trials and Earth in Balance never returned.  Heh.</p>
<p>fahrender — I think the other point we are missing about fascist/not fascist is that the governments of the Mediterranean were hardly what we Americans would recognize as democratic today, as evidenced by the lack of an appeals process and the immediacy of punishment following Socrates’ sentencing.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>rayne,</p>
<p>agreed. ironic how this description echoes that of what happened last weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.220 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-15 17:19:52 -->

