[Matt writes at SOTUblog and recently joined The Right's Field -- a blog focusing exclusively on the GOP field for president in '08.]
Earlier this month, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a new report that stated the Department of Defense "lacks the ability to oversee contractors." Too few military officials, the report says, are assigned to "ensure contract requirements are being met."
The 58-page GAO report is entitled "High-Level DOD Action Needed to Address Long-Standing Problems with Management and Oversight of Contractors Supporting Deployed Forces." Military officials and contractors stationed at home and abroad were interviewed for the report.
In response, the Pentagon created a new office under the assistant deputy undersecretary, reports the UPI.
The reliance on contractors is at, arguably, the highest levels ever. The First Persian Gulf War pales in comparison.
The Defense Department has more than 60,000 support contractors in Iraq but no accurate tally of how many and where they are, according to the report.
"By way of contrast, an estimated 9,200 contractor personnel supported military operations in the 1991 Gulf War," the report states.
Recently, press reports stated that there were over 100,000 contractors operating in Iraq -- a figure that did not include subcontractors. (The Iraq Study Group stated in their report that only 5,000 contractors were in Iraq. Only off by a factor of twenty.) The size of these pseudo-armies and other contractors are so large that they have become an indistinguishable cog in the war machine.
"The Army estimates that because of their limited visibility over contractors at deployed locations and the government services they are entitled to, about $43 million is lost every year on free meals being provided to contractor employees who are also receiving a per diem allowance for food," the report states. [emphasis added]
With U.S. military involvement lasting three-and-a-half years, that is roughly $120 million lost over the course of the conflict -- on free meals to contractors.
Come next week when the Democrats take over the reins of power in Washington, waste such as this will be an item of interest, to say the least.
##
And while Iraq descends into total chaos and more Americans die -- 106 109 in the month of December to make it the bloodiest month of 2006 -- Blackwater USA eyes a southern California site for another training facility. The proposed facility, in Potrero near San Diego, will be 824-acres. In an early approval process, the vote was 7-0 in favor.
Ten training areas would be developed in the southwestern and eastern portions of the site. Fifteen structures would be built. There would be 10 rifle ranges, five pistol ranges, an armory to store firearms and ammunition, four ship simulators and an urban simulation training area.
About 60 staff members would work at the center, which would serve about 300 students. Most students would stay in bunkhouses there for a week at a time.
##
Finally, on a personal note, with this being the last Saturday in 2006, I just wanted to say thank you to the FDL readers who have been incredibly supportive and welcoming. It is hard to believe that this series is over eight months old. I hope everyone is having a good holiday season and wanted to wish you all a Happy New Year.
Catch you guys on the flipside in '07.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight


Support this site!
Keep
up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

RSS/XML Feed
Matt. Fitz.
5,000. 60,000. 100,000 contractors. How can it be so unknowable how many contractors are in Iraq? Is the situation really that bad?
Matt O.!!
Matt, I’m glad you feel so welcome here. Yeah, this is a pretty good place to hang out. Happy New Year to you.
Abundans cautela non nocet.
(Extreme care makes no mischief.)
Who cares anymore? Not a corpse in the bathtub.
Oh… the contractors are over there so we don’t have to face them over here.
109
109 ==> 2998
New White House Motto:
“Rex non potest peccare” The King can do no wrong.
oregondave @
4
Matt—sometimes it may feel like it’s a singular reader, but know there are many of us who appreciate your excellent work.
[Mod note; thanks for the heads up. Typo corrected.]
Matt, a highlight of my 2006 was meeting you at YKos, reading this series of eye-opening reports, and speaking with you on the phone during your successful takedown of Pombo. Hope you heard Jerry McNerney’s excellent response to the President’s blather today.
Will you travel to DeeCee for the swearing-in of the new Congress next week?
Thanks for your excellent work here at FDL — I am looking forward to The Right’s Field most especially!!
Great as always Matt. Good job.
Matt O!!! Feliz navidad, baby! I’m looking forward to more of your terrific work in 2007 and you can bet I’ll find you at YKos.
Now, to read the post.
Matt
Thank you for all the posts you have written on the corruption within our government.
The truth is easy to see in your words. You are a truth-teller, Matt. Thank you.
Great more government funded human killing militia schools.
fuck
My guess is that the GAO’s estimates are likely way too low. The contractors are in and out of military installations all the time, and are often tied to the contractors who are providing meal services, as well.
Last year, daily meal service was running around $70/day, and commanders at some installations were only this year able to get those costs down to about $25/day (contrast this with the current separate rations entitlement of $8.10/day, which is the estimated cost of the services providing meals).
If one figures an average of $50/day, the estimated $430/yr per contractor would only be an average of eight and a half days worth of meals each. Certainly some don’t get double-dipped meals at all, and some wangle them all the time. Looking at averages, though, I’ll bet the actual costs of this are quite a bit higher.
Hello Matt!
If I may add a little color commentary to your outstanding research:
The biological equivilent to Matt’s post is:
One lion; one mountain. In other words, it takes a lot of grass to sustain a hrd large enough to feed one lion. Two lions slaughter the herd and both starve, no lions results in overgrazing and the herd starves. Nature seeks balance–hence one lion, one mountain.
Now, pervert this a little bit. Narrative provided by Tom Delay:
Now, the chum, or food source, is supplied by the inexhaustable source of the American Taxpayer. That’s right, sprinkle it liberally all around Iraqistan.
Lookit the cockroaches. Sheeit! Didja ever see so many! Hell, through some more feed on there, lookit’em go fukkin crazee!
Supply and demand.
Congress will not demand a reduction in supply.
The Ready Republican Response to the need for additional funds for government operations was always “reduce waste, fraud, and abuse”. It is a not so delicious irony that Republican rule has vastly expanded the scope for such opportunities.
I wonder if they would trade their tax cut mantra for some more “overlook”. We’ve seen how Ford abandoned principle for friendship in the pardon of Nixon. Do you think they could swallow some tax hikes on the rich rather than see their friends in jail?
Fuck ‘em. Revoke the tax cuts and nail the cheats. Give ‘em the same due process they were so proud to grant to Saddam.
I caught part of McNerney’s speech but read the whole thing the other day.
I won’t be able to make it to D.C. next week. Funds are tight and still looking for a job right now.
I like reading between the lines of your posts, Matt.
Someday you will fill in all these blanks and I won’t have any fun at all.
Gack, this makes me so mad, the waste and fraud that keeps getting shoved back under the rug. Welfare queens got nothin’ on Blackwater.
Not to be nitpicky, but isn’t it Potrero, CA, not Portero?
Matt Ortega @ 18
Where the hell is our leftwing wurlitzer welfare program that this fine young man pines away??
Somebody get Jennifer Nix on the phone.
Oilfieldguy @ 21
OFG, you are a genius!
Thanks for the support guys.
You all give me too much credit…
Hell, let’s pester Waxman.
Off topic, hope you don’t mind, Matt–I am just sitting here watching Gerald Ford’s funeral and am amazed that Bush is not attending.
Is he just enjoying his vacation at the pig farm too much to leave, or are they keeping him under wraps because he’s drunk or just coming unglued?
Mommybrain @
20
You’re correct. Thanks for the heads up.
Yoo hoo, Jaaane,
We need another slush fund. Okay, good politicians, good blogs and good bloggers.
That’s three. Message, messenger and vehicle, or something like that.
neurophius @ 25
Probably two things at work here. The first is that the PR flacks at the White House want the public to believe he’s doing “hard work” on his latest “plan for victory.” Second, he’s likely having a small hissy fit about the Woodward article claiming Ford’s opposition to the Iraq invasion.
jeffreyw @
24
If I have any say in this, I do like that suggestion.
I hear he’s hiring, just sayin’.
does anyone else here listen to the excellent weekly podcasts by george kenny at electric politics?
i just listened to his interview with chuck spinney on how, in general, the pentagon budgeting process is out of control and what might be done about it. a perspective and insights i have’t seen anywhere else. highly recommended (some funny bureaucracy stories too) and something i think would be of interest to matt and other firepups. sadly there is no transcript.
here’s some of the intro:
montag @ 28
Didn’t you know? What Ford said was an indecent coward and unmanly. Or so says Bill Bennett.
Matt,
you are me 20 years ago. I had to turn my back on politics in seach of filthy lucre. Care to contemplate what has happened since? Hmmmm?
I appreciate your humility and it is refreshing, but allow an old bull the opportunity to poke a prodding horn into the derrier of all nearby.
Matt Ortega @ 32
Oh,yeah, Bill Bennett, the gambling freak who can’t control his self-destructive habit. I bet Bennett is almost as heterosexual and manly as General J.C. Christian, Patriot.
stellar work, as always Matt. thanks, and happy new year.
Henry Waxman can be contacted here at his web page. He asks for your opinion, with a contact page, and as a bonus, he is highlighting the same GAO report that Matt references tonight.
selise @ 31
I just want to add a brief bit about Chuck Spinney. He has a couple of papers written about fifteen years ago that are, frankly, seminal pieces in understanding why the Pentagon procurement process is so godawful.
I quoted Spinney extensively in one chapter of the book I finished last year on defense spending.
This is probably his definitional article on how the system is stacked in favor of the contractors against the interests of the taxpayers.
Matt Ortega @ 29
Okay folks, here’s the deal. Matt prints out all his posts with addendums and all that imortant crap and we push for him to testify before Waxman, highlighting all his findings.
This catapaults Matt into the mainstream who maybe gets a job somewhere as the internet liason.
Shouldn;t be to hard to do. Waxman will want somebody other than himself to point out the bullshit.
Let’s push.
We have reached the natural republican heaven of privatization. At first, we farmed things out so we could cheat the workers. In my hometown, we let private contractors pick up garbage, and screw the workers out of their benefits. When municipalities did it, they were at least looking for cost savings.
Now, we see the true goal: screw the taxpayers. It might be cheaper to use Army cooks and mechanics, but that won’t push Dick Cheney’s options into the stratosphere. For that, you need to steal from taxpayers and forward the money to Halliburton and Blackwater.
Not to mention Corrections Corporation of America, and the imprisonment of as many people as possible.
Oilfieldguy @ 38
Whoa there. I am merely highlighting news articles and government reports.
What I’d like to see are the people that created these government reports and those they interviewed under oath.
“Whoa there. I am merely highlighting news articles and government reports.”
Matt, you don’t give yourself enough credit. What you have done here at FDL in educating the blogosphere about these issues is phenomenal, in my opinion. I wasn’t getting that information anywhere else.
Don’t let your modesty hold you back in your quest for suitable employment.
I understand Matt. Information clearinghouses for congress are commonly called lobbyists.
It would be good for congress to have a bright young handsome young man to spoonfeed them publicly information that is readily available.
There is a phrase for it: constructed mediated reality.
Henry Waxman:
In Washington, D.C.
2204 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
(202) 225-3976 (phone)
(202) 225-4099 (fax)
Those of you in his district:
In Los Angeles
8436 West Third Street, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90048
(323) 651-1040 (phone)
(818) 878-7400 (phone)
(310) 652-3095 (phone)
(323) 655-0502 (fax)
Matt, do you have a contact person in Waxman’s office whom we could speak with on your behalf?
If you don’t, and you find one later, please let us know.
Matt Ortega @ 32
To tell you the truth, I wish Ford had said something earlier. It might not have done any good, but who knows.
However, Bennett’s self-righteous reaction pretty much explains why Ford didn’t do that. They would have said the same things about him if he’d done it back then, or worse. They’d probably have been wondering out loud why he gave aid and comfort to the terrorists and why does he suddenly hate America? I think given the choices you can’t blame Ford too much for keeping his mouth shut. At least now he doesn’t have to listen to those blowhards defaming him.
Matt Ortega @ 23
No we don’t. You are doing great work Matt. I can hear the job huntin’ blues from where I sit. Keep your chin up. It’s always tough finding a job this time of year.
Some one needs to be able to steer the investigators in the right direction.
I agree that you may not be the best person to sit in front of the committee under oath, but I think that you would fit in nicely off camera, whispering questions and writing notes.
Actually, I would argue a very different rethuglican heaven has been achieved… the terminal cooption of the public realm by criminals. They don’t need to privatize anything if they can just pillage the treasury. The public bureaucracy under b43 is the biggest it’s ever been.. which is as far from the Republican vision of minimal/privatized government as one can imagine.. only that bureaucracy exists in substantial measure only to enrich those elected by us to run it… I believe the proper term is “kleptocracy”.
masaccio @ 39
“We have reached the natural republican heaven of privatization”
Or,
Matt, you can fill out this form. It comes complete with a comment section where you can describe your eight months worth of front page posting on one of the most popular progressive blogs, how you have a built-in audience of (hit site meter below for the latest figures) active voters and donors. (Also be sure to include the millions of dollars raised by Act-Blue sites)
Seriously, Matt, FDLers want you there, this is your issue.
Time to step up.
The other day there was a post somewhere, maybe here, that had a list of people who would now be advising the Democratic committee chairs. . .I noticed some of them had been working in DC, and some for the same particular representative/senator for years.
Hard workers can be hard to find. I suppose DC is chockfulla ambitious young pups, but I also think that it is possible to make some inroads, particularly if you have some connections. . .
montag @ 37
thanks for the chuck spinney background and link. i’d never heard of him (my ignorance is showing). the interview was about an hour and a half long and i was disappointed when it ended. so, i’m very glad to have more from spinney to think about. he’s apparently a real expert trying to do an excellent job. wow.
as a plug for kenney’s weekly interview podcast. he gets some really interesting people who aren’t on everyone else’s interview lists and usually does a very good job of asking questions to draw out the guest… and then let’s them talk.
Matt. Thank you so much. Incredibly important post.
My New Years resolution, starting a bit early, is to do something I have at least a little skill at, since you guys are way beyond me in everything else.
to wit: proofreading services.
typo?:
2nd paragraph past the 2nd block-quote.
“reigns” should be “reins” (?). Kinda symbolic, actually. The repubs have been reigning, as a king would. I assume the Dems would be more interested in steering, as befits being majority in a democracy, no?
In other words, if a slip, it was a darned accurate one, but it won’t be with Dems in power eh? ;->
[Mod Note; it was tough to decide if you wanted it corrected, or not, but we did it anyway]
Cujo359 @ 45
No sooner do I finish that thought, when yet another slobbering loudmouth weighs in (h/t Taylor M.):
http://www.slate.com/id/2156400/fr/rss/
Is it any wonder he wanted to live out his last few years without having to engage these sanctimonious twits?
Matts the man. I met him at YKos, although he may not remember me. He is a tall dark handsome latino with a brilliant smile–think Jimmy Smits, only not so damn ugly.
Oilfieldguy @ 49
yep! waxman gonna need help getting the word out….
For every committee chair there must be fifty aides of one description or another.
I don’t know what sort of presence Henry has on the web, other than his government page, or even what he thinks of bloggers, but it seems to me that you could be of help were he to be convinced that we were on his side and could help him a lot in the goal of molding public opinion in support of our shared goals.
Cujo359 @ 53
Hmm, a former president without the conviction of his own opinions.
There’s a symbol of our age.
Jimmy Carter is 80. He’s still saying unpopular things because they need to be said.
Howard Zinn is 84. He’s still writing and lecturing and saying unpopular things because they need to be said.
More IOKIYAR….
OT Reminder - Blog Wars is on Sundance channel tonight! If you want to see an hour long movie about FDL in CT this summer, tonight is your chance.
Bob Marley:
You would not be alone Matt. If you felt the need, I would be willing to help coach. Maybe meet at Siuns in ChiTown with other FDLers for a roundtable.
With respect to Ford, whatever his motivations were in giving and then embargoing that interview with Woodward, it has come out, from beyond the grave, at the most devastating possible moment for shrubbery. If he had made this public in 2004, he would’ve just been another “has been” naysayer, and the rethug machinery would have jumped all over him, ripped him apart and fed him to their young, as is their standard modus operandi… at a time when shrub still enjoyed overwhelming public support for his war. It may have cost shrub a few percentage points at the polls, but that’s probably it. It’s a little harder to attack a guy in the same week you have to give him a state funeral… Shrub just looks like the sanctimonious idiot megalomaniac he is.
Blub @ 61
How does damage to Bush compare with another elder statesman possibly having the opportunity to sway public opinion against the war when it really mattered? If Ford were as popular with older conservatives as I suspect that he was, his opinions might have made a difference–and possibly saved many lives.
But, Ford wasn’t willing to take the chance that his party might have been damaged by his considered opinions, and he wasn’t willing to defend them publicly.
I don’t see that as either forthright or admirable.
Oh, believe me, I ‘m not saying that his behavior was admirable at all. I’m just saying that the statement coming out now has greater effect, politically, than it would have in early 2004. That’s all. He could be most wretched rethug in the world, for all that matters :)
Oh, here’s something perfectly pathetic:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200.....ld_ford_54
“Cheney hails Ford’s pardon of Nixon”
Shall we interpret that as a promise by him to his chief executive or merely wishful thinking?
Blub @ 63
I take it you’re saying that its effects are now bigger than they would have been before the election in 2004? Every Dem in the country running on war issues would have seized on those remarks as Republican agreement with their position. That’s why Ford would not say it publicly at the time.
Mods, Matt. 52
Granted. I liked it better in the original also.
My “concern” is that many of the posts on FDL, this one of Matt’s very much included, are apt to be quoted widely in the future.
They’re not just good. They’re critically important to the future of our government/country/people/world. (I have no idea how to divide those levels. Just pick what works for you, if & as appropriate.)
At this point, FDL-generated ideas are re-surfacing at the forefront of efforts addressing in an honest, forthright manner, a whole array of serious problems which many politicians would just as soon continue to ignore.
Success in dealing with what faces us and succeeding generations depends mightily on getting these messages out to a wider audience.
Revisit the recent articles Christy and others have presented. Revisit Howie’s stirring article of today. Bravo to all!
I say HAPPY NEW YEAR, and let’s hit the ground running.
‘member George Carlin’s crazy routine?
“You tall guys, behind the trees; you short guys, behind the bushes. Hey, you wid da beads…”
Oh heck. That was another age. Let’s all do what we can and, above all else, respect all and work for good. There is hope. It’s just gonna take a lotta work.
Again. Thank you Matt!
I guess my instinct is that it wouldn’t have made that much of a difference.. Fine, people like my parents, in California, might have been swayed.. I just don’t think it would’ve bought us the votes we needed among dixiecrats and in Ohio… the base there was voting on a fundamentally different set of issues. In fact, in those regions of the country, it may even have had the opposite effect, bringing more wingnut lunatics out to vote to help clean up the moderate EPISCOPALIAN skeletons in the rethug party. May be I’ve become too cynical, but that’s how I feel. IMO, these voters are not reasonable people.. nor are they people of good character.
Oh, btw, Bush just said, on Ford, “He always put the needs of his country before his own, and did what he thought was right, even when those decisions were unpopular,” Bush said. … is that a promise that he plans ot kill more people polls be damned?
montag @ 65
Eureka Springs, AR @ 58
DANG! Wish we got Sundance. Enjoy folks. Some day maybe we’ll see a tape….
Adie @ 68
Double Dang. It was on tonight four hours earlier than I expected. Should have checked the local schedule earlier.
Anyone know if/when it’s going to be on again?
my gawd, you know this last week waiting for the oversite has taken longer the the entire house elections
incredible, it seems like an entire generation since we took control
I WANT OVER SITE AND I WANT IT AS SOON AS WE STEP THROUGH THE HALLS OF CONGRESS
our constitution lies in wait, she is beaten and weary, she needs to rise from comatic sleep the enemies of democracy have cursed her tired soul
SHE WAITS TO RISE LIKE THE GREAT PHOENIX, SPREAD HER MIGHTY WINGS, SHE LONGS TO SOAR ONCE MORE
she needs our help, she is undernourished, she is atrophied.
we are not her last BEST hope, WE ARE HER LAST AND ONLY HOPE
I await my love, and she will rise
democracy will rise
her people will rise
we will rise once more.
sorry about that, it just came out and wouldn’t stop till I finished.
g’night firedogs, see all L8ter