<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BREAKING:  Cheney On Libby Witness List</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/breaking-cheney-on-libby-witness-list/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/breaking-cheney-on-libby-witness-list/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:29:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: freepatriot</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/breaking-cheney-on-libby-witness-list/#comment-425370</link>
		<dc:creator>freepatriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/breaking-cheney-on-libby-witness-list/#comment-425370</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-424734&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;perris @ 29 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;the strategy will be for Cheney to answer his name and a few other things that have nothing to do with the case&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;executive privilege for everything else and the case is dismissed&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;that’s IF he accepts the subpeona, I expect him to claim he is too busy to appear&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;yo perris, it don’t quite work that way here&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;we don’t dismiss criminal charges just because the Defendant’s witnesses refuse to answer questions&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if it worked that way, every criminal defendant would call a witness who refuses to answer the questions, and then have the charges dismissed&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;scooter gets a fair chance to defend himself. if his superiors and co-conspiritors refuse to cooperate with his defense, the jury can take that refusal into consideration during their deliberations&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don’t think dead eye refusing to answer questions is likely to help scooter in front of a jury, but scooter is welcome to try that as a defense tactic&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-424734"><em>perris @ 29 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>the strategy will be for Cheney to answer his name and a few other things that have nothing to do with the case</p>
<p>executive privilege for everything else and the case is dismissed</p>
<p>that’s IF he accepts the subpeona, I expect him to claim he is too busy to appear</p>
</blockquote>
<p>yo perris, it don’t quite work that way here</p>
<p>we don’t dismiss criminal charges just because the Defendant’s witnesses refuse to answer questions</p>
<p>if it worked that way, every criminal defendant would call a witness who refuses to answer the questions, and then have the charges dismissed</p>
<p>scooter gets a fair chance to defend himself. if his superiors and co-conspiritors refuse to cooperate with his defense, the jury can take that refusal into consideration during their deliberations</p>
<p>I don’t think dead eye refusing to answer questions is likely to help scooter in front of a jury, but scooter is welcome to try that as a defense tactic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Shergold</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/breaking-cheney-on-libby-witness-list/#comment-425364</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Shergold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 08:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/breaking-cheney-on-libby-witness-list/#comment-425364</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-424807&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Peterr @&lt;br /&gt;
                87              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hoist on her own petard, if I . . .&lt;em&gt;[pause for ironic effect]&lt;/em&gt; . . . recall correctly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If Cheney’s on the stand, the federal court system could really make a mint if they put Fitz’s cross-examination on pay-per-view.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three cheers for the correct use of an obsolete nautical metaphor!  Grog for all and to all a good night!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-424807"><em>Peterr @<br />
                87              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Hoist on her own petard, if I . . .<em>[pause for ironic effect]</em> . . . recall correctly.</p>
<p>If Cheney’s on the stand, the federal court system could really make a mint if they put Fitz’s cross-examination on pay-per-view.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Three cheers for the correct use of an obsolete nautical metaphor!  Grog for all and to all a good night!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Shergold</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/breaking-cheney-on-libby-witness-list/#comment-425362</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Shergold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 08:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/breaking-cheney-on-libby-witness-list/#comment-425362</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-424806&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Alice Marshall @&lt;br /&gt;
                86              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Question #1&lt;br /&gt;
Your honor, I would ask the witness to hold this mirror in front of his face that the court can determine if he is capable of casting a reflection.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before X-examination an X-ray is in order. Make sure there’s human gear under the skin.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As to “I’m too busy”: the man has no mandated duties under the Constitution except for sitting on his glutes.  He can do that in court.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-424806"><em>Alice Marshall @<br />
                86              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Question #1<br />
Your honor, I would ask the witness to hold this mirror in front of his face that the court can determine if he is capable of casting a reflection.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Before X-examination an X-ray is in order. Make sure there’s human gear under the skin.</p>
<p>As to “I’m too busy”: the man has no mandated duties under the Constitution except for sitting on his glutes.  He can do that in court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burnspbesq</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/breaking-cheney-on-libby-witness-list/#comment-425307</link>
		<dc:creator>burnspbesq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 05:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/breaking-cheney-on-libby-witness-list/#comment-425307</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Frank Probst @ 136:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I understand what you’re saying, but I’ve never though that putting an uncontrollable loose cannon on the stand is good lawyering.  Cheney is even more of a nightmare witness than Bill Gates ever thought of being: he will think he can outsmart the process, and he won’t take the time to be properly prepped.  Fitz is going to hand him his head, on a plate, with fava beans and a good chianti.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If this isn’t a bluff, I will be the most surprised person in the room.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank Probst @ 136:</p>
<p>I understand what you’re saying, but I’ve never though that putting an uncontrollable loose cannon on the stand is good lawyering.  Cheney is even more of a nightmare witness than Bill Gates ever thought of being: he will think he can outsmart the process, and he won’t take the time to be properly prepped.  Fitz is going to hand him his head, on a plate, with fava beans and a good chianti.</p>
<p>If this isn’t a bluff, I will be the most surprised person in the room.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharoney</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/breaking-cheney-on-libby-witness-list/#comment-425160</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/breaking-cheney-on-libby-witness-list/#comment-425160</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, MacDaffy, thanks for speaking up!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’ll link to your original comment from now on when I quote your extremely funny parody. Merry Fitzmas!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-424978&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;MacDaffy @&lt;br /&gt;
                128              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sharoney @94&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you for the very pleasant surprise. I wrote &lt;em&gt;Fitzmas Time&lt;/em&gt; for Salon’s &lt;a href=&quot;http://tabletalk.salon.com/webx?14@775.1e4eabHxWIN.3857299@.eec6c36/1074&quot;&gt;Table Talk&lt;/a&gt; a little over a year ago.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, MacDaffy, thanks for speaking up!</p>
<p>I’ll link to your original comment from now on when I quote your extremely funny parody. Merry Fitzmas!<br />
<a href="#comment-424978"><em>MacDaffy @<br />
                128              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Sharoney @94</p>
<p>Thank you for the very pleasant surprise. I wrote <em>Fitzmas Time</em> for Salon’s <a href="http://tabletalk.salon.com/webx?14@775.1e4eabHxWIN.3857299@.eec6c36/1074">Table Talk</a> a little over a year ago.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Probst</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/breaking-cheney-on-libby-witness-list/#comment-425137</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Probst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/breaking-cheney-on-libby-witness-list/#comment-425137</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-425115&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mary @ 135&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I tend to think Libby/Cheney/Bush already have a coordinated, cooperative strategy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But if I didn’t, and I was representing Libby and a bit concerned he might be out of the strategy loop, calling Cheney does something that nothing else cand do.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheney is the only person who can walk the authorization to cherrypick and leak-to-mislead right back to Bush.  Cheney on the stand pretty much opens the door to the question about who authorized the NIE leak (the Decider).  Nobody else puts the vanity plates on the Bushmobile, under oath.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If I didn’t basically think they were all pretty much in each other’s pocket, I’d think it was a pardon nudge.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think it’s just good lawyering.  Libby’s lawyers are throwing everything but the kitchen sink at Judge Walton, trying to get anything to stick.  Calling Cheney is just one more trick in a long line of failed attempts to find some reason to get this case thrown out.  It will probably be just as successful as all of the other attempts, as Fitz can likely stipulate just about anything Cheney might say (”Scooter was REALLY busy.”) without hurting his case.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More than anything, I think that this move shows that (a) Libby is nervous enough that he needs to be firing shots across Cheney’s bow to throw him some sort of lifeline, and (b) Fitz thinks his case is so solid that he doesn’t need Cheney’s testimony to nail Libby to the wall.  I’m happy about both points.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-425115"><em>Mary @ 135</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>I tend to think Libby/Cheney/Bush already have a coordinated, cooperative strategy.</p>
<p>But if I didn’t, and I was representing Libby and a bit concerned he might be out of the strategy loop, calling Cheney does something that nothing else cand do.</p>
<p>Cheney is the only person who can walk the authorization to cherrypick and leak-to-mislead right back to Bush.  Cheney on the stand pretty much opens the door to the question about who authorized the NIE leak (the Decider).  Nobody else puts the vanity plates on the Bushmobile, under oath.</p>
<p>If I didn’t basically think they were all pretty much in each other’s pocket, I’d think it was a pardon nudge.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think it’s just good lawyering.  Libby’s lawyers are throwing everything but the kitchen sink at Judge Walton, trying to get anything to stick.  Calling Cheney is just one more trick in a long line of failed attempts to find some reason to get this case thrown out.  It will probably be just as successful as all of the other attempts, as Fitz can likely stipulate just about anything Cheney might say (”Scooter was REALLY busy.”) without hurting his case.</p>
<p>More than anything, I think that this move shows that (a) Libby is nervous enough that he needs to be firing shots across Cheney’s bow to throw him some sort of lifeline, and (b) Fitz thinks his case is so solid that he doesn’t need Cheney’s testimony to nail Libby to the wall.  I’m happy about both points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/breaking-cheney-on-libby-witness-list/#comment-425115</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/breaking-cheney-on-libby-witness-list/#comment-425115</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I tend to think Libby/Cheney/Bush already have a coordinated, cooperative strategy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But if I didn’t, and I was representing Libby and a bit concerned he might be out of the strategy loop, calling Cheney does something that nothing else cand do.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheney is the only person who can walk the authorization to cherrypick and leak-to-mislead right back to Bush.  Cheney on the stand pretty much opens the door to the question about who authorized the NIE leak (the Decider).  Nobody else puts the vanity plates on the Bushmobile, under oath.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If I didn’t basically think they were all pretty much in each other’s pocket, I’d think it was a pardon nudge.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to think Libby/Cheney/Bush already have a coordinated, cooperative strategy.</p>
<p>But if I didn’t, and I was representing Libby and a bit concerned he might be out of the strategy loop, calling Cheney does something that nothing else cand do.</p>
<p>Cheney is the only person who can walk the authorization to cherrypick and leak-to-mislead right back to Bush.  Cheney on the stand pretty much opens the door to the question about who authorized the NIE leak (the Decider).  Nobody else puts the vanity plates on the Bushmobile, under oath.</p>
<p>If I didn’t basically think they were all pretty much in each other’s pocket, I’d think it was a pardon nudge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AP: Cheney to be Called as Defense Witness for Libby :: SOTUblog</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/breaking-cheney-on-libby-witness-list/#comment-425105</link>
		<dc:creator>AP: Cheney to be Called as Defense Witness for Libby :: SOTUblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/breaking-cheney-on-libby-witness-list/#comment-425105</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[…] [Christy Hardin-Smith does the lawyer thing and has some questions at FDL.]  […]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] [Christy Hardin-Smith does the lawyer thing and has some questions at FDL.]  […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badwater</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/breaking-cheney-on-libby-witness-list/#comment-425051</link>
		<dc:creator>Badwater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/breaking-cheney-on-libby-witness-list/#comment-425051</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, I think that there will be no trial of Scooter or anyone connected to Bush.  There will, however, be a long list of Presidential Pardons.  At least we can hope that Bush gets writers cramp.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I think that there will be no trial of Scooter or anyone connected to Bush.  There will, however, be a long list of Presidential Pardons.  At least we can hope that Bush gets writers cramp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/breaking-cheney-on-libby-witness-list/#comment-425041</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/breaking-cheney-on-libby-witness-list/#comment-425041</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Judge: Mr. Vice President, would you place your right hand on the bible and take the oath.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheney places hand on Bible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Suddenly steam starts emitting from the Bible and there are sparks and a fire starts, then the Bible just explodes in a ball of flames.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Dark Overlord has arrived.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;———&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Uh, Cheney will probably testify and protect Libby a bit, but also add a lot of “I don’t recall.”s and the like.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When is this shindig by the way?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judge: Mr. Vice President, would you place your right hand on the bible and take the oath.</p>
<p>Cheney places hand on Bible.</p>
<p>Suddenly steam starts emitting from the Bible and there are sparks and a fire starts, then the Bible just explodes in a ball of flames.</p>
<p>The Dark Overlord has arrived.</p>
<p>———</p>
<p>Uh, Cheney will probably testify and protect Libby a bit, but also add a lot of “I don’t recall.”s and the like.</p>
<p>When is this shindig by the way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
