<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hubris, Anyone?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/6183/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/6183/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:12:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanbark</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/6183/#comment-425020</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanbark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/6183/#comment-425020</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;RE:  Merrie Englande…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  does anyone think that Gordon Brown is looking forward to inheriting 7200 Brit troops as hostages?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE:  Merrie Englande…</p>
<p>  does anyone think that Gordon Brown is looking forward to inheriting 7200 Brit troops as hostages?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adie</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/6183/#comment-424633</link>
		<dc:creator>Adie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/6183/#comment-424633</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-424447&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Badwater @&lt;br /&gt;
                103              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-424424&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Adie @ 83 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;jr. “uses” church the same way he “uses” that little flag in his lapel…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think you are right, but why do church goers allow him to get away with it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;subtle, guilt-tripping memobubbles released by rover into the MSM &amp; “holier-than..” ethers?  Yeah, I’m serious.  Think about it…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-424447"><em>Badwater @<br />
                103              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-424424"><em>Adie @ 83 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>jr. “uses” church the same way he “uses” that little flag in his lapel…</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think you are right, but why do church goers allow him to get away with it?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>subtle, guilt-tripping memobubbles released by rover into the MSM &amp; “holier-than..” ethers?  Yeah, I’m serious.  Think about it…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AngryOne</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/6183/#comment-424529</link>
		<dc:creator>AngryOne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/6183/#comment-424529</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The same George W. Bush who so proudly declared himself a “war president” is leading the United States to strategic bankruptcy and geopolitical disaster. As Commander-in-Chief, President Bush displays all the hallmarks of the failed executive. With a nod to Stephen Covey, call them the “Seven Habits of Highly Defective Presidents.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. Name Names and Outsource Responsibility&lt;br /&gt;
2. Focus on the Process, Not the Plan&lt;br /&gt;
3. Set Dates to Turn Corners&lt;br /&gt;
4. Use New Slogans for An Old, Failed Product&lt;br /&gt;
5. Find New Uses for An Old, Failed Product&lt;br /&gt;
6. Announce Your New Product Before It’s Ready&lt;br /&gt;
7. Don’t Do The Market Research&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the analysis, see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.perrspectives.com/blog/archives/000500.htm&quot;&gt;“Iraq and the 7 Habits of Highly Defective Presidents.”&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same George W. Bush who so proudly declared himself a “war president” is leading the United States to strategic bankruptcy and geopolitical disaster. As Commander-in-Chief, President Bush displays all the hallmarks of the failed executive. With a nod to Stephen Covey, call them the “Seven Habits of Highly Defective Presidents.”</p>
<p>1. Name Names and Outsource Responsibility<br />
2. Focus on the Process, Not the Plan<br />
3. Set Dates to Turn Corners<br />
4. Use New Slogans for An Old, Failed Product<br />
5. Find New Uses for An Old, Failed Product<br />
6. Announce Your New Product Before It’s Ready<br />
7. Don’t Do The Market Research</p>
<p>For the analysis, see:<br />
<b><a href="http://www.perrspectives.com/blog/archives/000500.htm">“Iraq and the 7 Habits of Highly Defective Presidents.”</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rumi</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/6183/#comment-424508</link>
		<dc:creator>rumi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/6183/#comment-424508</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-424505&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;selise @ 114&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wow, thank you so much for the education! now if i can just remember to stick with nouns…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks to all for the help in understanding.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Verbs are good too.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IMPEACH!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-424505"><em>selise @ 114</em></a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>wow, thank you so much for the education! now if i can just remember to stick with nouns…</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Thanks to all for the help in understanding.</p>
<p>Verbs are good too.</p>
<p>IMPEACH!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: selise</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/6183/#comment-424505</link>
		<dc:creator>selise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/6183/#comment-424505</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-424489&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Bargain Countertenor @ 113&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Shi’ite&lt;/i&gt; is an adjective form, &lt;i&gt;Shia&lt;/i&gt; is a noun form.  However, my understanding is that &lt;i&gt;Shiite&lt;/i&gt; is a vaguely disparaging English form.  Prior usage of the form with regard to religious adherents (e.g., Campbellite, Taylorite) supports such an interpretation.  &lt;i&gt;Shia&lt;/i&gt; would then be the preferred form, and I guess you use circumlocutions to avoid needing adjectives.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that we don’t refer to Sunni muslims as Sunni’ite.  Part of the current war of all-against-all in Iraq is a Sunni-Shia confrontation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BC&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wow, thank you so much for the education! now if i can just remember to stick with nouns…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-424489"><em>Bargain Countertenor @ 113</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><i>Shi’ite</i> is an adjective form, <i>Shia</i> is a noun form.  However, my understanding is that <i>Shiite</i> is a vaguely disparaging English form.  Prior usage of the form with regard to religious adherents (e.g., Campbellite, Taylorite) supports such an interpretation.  <i>Shia</i> would then be the preferred form, and I guess you use circumlocutions to avoid needing adjectives.</p>
<p>Note that we don’t refer to Sunni muslims as Sunni’ite.  Part of the current war of all-against-all in Iraq is a Sunni-Shia confrontation.</p>
<p>BC</p>
</blockquote>
<p>wow, thank you so much for the education! now if i can just remember to stick with nouns…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bargain Countertenor</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/6183/#comment-424489</link>
		<dc:creator>Bargain Countertenor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/6183/#comment-424489</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-424416&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;selise @ 76 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-424391&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;angie @ 59&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;(I still believe that we actually engineered the civil war…)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i have wondered…. in april 2004 during the first attack on sunni falluja, shiia participated in a nonviolent protest/convoy of aid until the attack was called off…. then in november (after usa elections) when the attack was resumed, there was no support.  a couple months later the shiite mosque in samarra was bombed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;did the usa negotiate with shiite leaders to abandon their previous support for falluja?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;was the mosque bombing retribution?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;was that when sectarian conflict spiraled out of control?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(a stupid question - what is the proper usage of shiia and shiite? when should i use one or the other term?)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Shi’ite&lt;/i&gt; is an adjective form, &lt;i&gt;Shia&lt;/i&gt; is a noun form.  However, my understanding is that &lt;i&gt;Shiite&lt;/i&gt; is a vaguely disparaging English form.  Prior usage of the form with regard to religious adherents (e.g., Campbellite, Taylorite) supports such an interpretation.  &lt;i&gt;Shia&lt;/i&gt; would then be the preferred form, and I guess you use circumlocutions to avoid needing adjectives.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that we don’t refer to Sunni muslims as Sunni’ite.  Part of the current war of all-against-all in Iraq is a Sunni-Shia confrontation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BC&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-424416"><em>selise @ 76 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-424391"><em>angie @ 59</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>(I still believe that we actually engineered the civil war…)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>i have wondered…. in april 2004 during the first attack on sunni falluja, shiia participated in a nonviolent protest/convoy of aid until the attack was called off…. then in november (after usa elections) when the attack was resumed, there was no support.  a couple months later the shiite mosque in samarra was bombed.</p>
<p>did the usa negotiate with shiite leaders to abandon their previous support for falluja?</p>
<p>was the mosque bombing retribution?</p>
<p>was that when sectarian conflict spiraled out of control?</p>
<p>(a stupid question &#8211; what is the proper usage of shiia and shiite? when should i use one or the other term?)</p>
</blockquote>
<p><i>Shi’ite</i> is an adjective form, <i>Shia</i> is a noun form.  However, my understanding is that <i>Shiite</i> is a vaguely disparaging English form.  Prior usage of the form with regard to religious adherents (e.g., Campbellite, Taylorite) supports such an interpretation.  <i>Shia</i> would then be the preferred form, and I guess you use circumlocutions to avoid needing adjectives.</p>
<p>Note that we don’t refer to Sunni muslims as Sunni’ite.  Part of the current war of all-against-all in Iraq is a Sunni-Shia confrontation.</p>
<p>BC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mls</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/6183/#comment-424487</link>
		<dc:creator>mls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/6183/#comment-424487</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-424358&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;katymine @ 32 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;via Froomkin:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;“It can be argued that Bush understood little about war and peace and diplomacy and honesty in government. Cheney understood all of it, and he bears much of the responsibility for what’s gone on in Washington and in Iraq for the last six years. Keep a sharp eye on him. Desperate men do desperate things.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A couple of months ago, John Dean stated at an ACLU Townhall that the genius of Cheney is that he allows Bush to wake up everyday thinking he is President.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt; I don’t think there is any genius in Cheney’s ability to let Bush wake up thinking he is President.  I think anyone could pull off that trick. Bush’s mind is too delusional to think otherwise. He is a complete tool and fool.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-424358"><em>katymine @ 32 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>via Froomkin:</p>
<blockquote><p>“It can be argued that Bush understood little about war and peace and diplomacy and honesty in government. Cheney understood all of it, and he bears much of the responsibility for what’s gone on in Washington and in Iraq for the last six years. Keep a sharp eye on him. Desperate men do desperate things.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>A couple of months ago, John Dean stated at an ACLU Townhall that the genius of Cheney is that he allows Bush to wake up everyday thinking he is President.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> I don’t think there is any genius in Cheney’s ability to let Bush wake up thinking he is President.  I think anyone could pull off that trick. Bush’s mind is too delusional to think otherwise. He is a complete tool and fool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrandmaJ</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/6183/#comment-424463</link>
		<dc:creator>GrandmaJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/6183/#comment-424463</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Regarding what the Wash. Post reported (repeated several times above) about the Generals being against more troops, what I read is that they are objecting to short term deployment of limited numbers of troops.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bush will take that to mean the Generals are advocating for 100,000 more troops for 5 years.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What I fear is the reason for Bush’s delay on his ‘new path forward’ speech, is that they are about to call up almost all National Guard units at one time.  And they did not want the hullabaloo that would create over Christmas.  How very evil of them.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding what the Wash. Post reported (repeated several times above) about the Generals being against more troops, what I read is that they are objecting to short term deployment of limited numbers of troops.</p>
<p>Bush will take that to mean the Generals are advocating for 100,000 more troops for 5 years.  </p>
<p>What I fear is the reason for Bush’s delay on his ‘new path forward’ speech, is that they are about to call up almost all National Guard units at one time.  And they did not want the hullabaloo that would create over Christmas.  How very evil of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Hardin Smith</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/6183/#comment-424459</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Hardin Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/6183/#comment-424459</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/the-loss-of-american-influence/&quot;&gt;Fresh thread&lt;/a&gt;, all.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/the-loss-of-american-influence/">Fresh thread</a>, all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EvilDrPuma</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/6183/#comment-424458</link>
		<dc:creator>EvilDrPuma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/12/19/6183/#comment-424458</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-424447&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Badwater @ 103 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-424424&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Adie @ 83 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;jr. “uses” church the same way he “uses” that little flag in his lapel…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think you are right, but why do church goers allow him to get away with it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That’s right up there with “Muslims aren’t condemning bin Laden loudly enough. They must agree with his actions” for fallacious attributions of collective responsibility.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-424447"><em>Badwater @ 103 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-424424"><em>Adie @ 83 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>jr. “uses” church the same way he “uses” that little flag in his lapel…</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think you are right, but why do church goers allow him to get away with it?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That’s right up there with “Muslims aren’t condemning bin Laden loudly enough. They must agree with his actions” for fallacious attributions of collective responsibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.239 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-15 10:24:18 -->

