
Nothing like slipping in the perks for your cronies at the last minute:
A huge tax bill that Congress passed last week contained a little-noticed gift for select corporations — tens of millions of dollars in breaks on import tariffs.
Early Saturday morning, in the frantic final hours of the 109th Congress, lawmakers rolled 520 tariff suspensions into the must-pass bill. The provisions will reduce or eliminate taxes on imported products as varied as shoes, camcorders and boiled oysters.
While such suspensions have been around for decades, the flurry of provisions pushed this Congress to a record of nearly 800 for the year. Corporate lobbyists often craft such suspensions to apply to just one product imported by just one company. Many of those companies and their executives have given millions of dollars to political campaigns. (emphasis mine)
Oink! Oink! And they wonder why we say that more oversight, accountability and sunshine are needed? Sheesh! But if you think this is just the same old cronyism leading to bigger corporate profits that don't impact the little guy much, think again:
Under informal congressional guidelines, individual tariff suspensions are supposed to cost no more than $500,000 a year in lost taxes. But a Washington Post investigation, published in September, found that the authors of a number of the provisions managed to quietly file multiple measures aimed at a single product. That strategy can allow individual importers to pocket millions of dollars in tax savings.Rep. Sander M. Levin (D-Mich.), who is expected to chair the House Ways and Means subcommittee on trade next year, said yesterday that he favors including in the suspension measures the names of the companies that would benefit. He also wants to close loopholes that allow companies to evade the $500,000 cap.
"The old days of lack of transparency, I think those days have to end," Levin said. "These are supposed to be small items. . . . I am in favor of keeping it small and making it totally open."
Altogether, the suspensions passed this year could cost the Treasury hundreds of millions of dollars in lost revenue. The previous Congress approved about 440 new and extended suspensions, at an estimated cost of $172 million. (emphasis mine)
Nice deficit you have there. Oh yeah. The next person who tries to tell me that Republicans are the party of fiscal responsibility are going to get an earful. Shameful gluttony and crass cronyism — there's your Grand Old Party — more slop, anyone? And for every "fiscal conservative" out there saying "hey, that's not MY Republican party…these people don't speak for me," I ask — what have you been doing to try and stop them? Silence equals complicity — and it is well past time for the people who claim to be the financial grown-ups to stand up and act like they have some sense and some integrity. Enough is enough.
(H/T to TeddySanFran for sending me the link on this article. Infuriating doesn't begin to describe it.)
Related posts:
- Max Tax Allows Insurance Companies to Suck Cash Directly from Treasury
- The California Territory
- CBO: We Didn’t Really Score the Finance Committee Bill; $44 Billion, Millions of Uninsured Americans Ignored
- Business Roundtable: Health Care Costs Would Balloon Under Status Quo
- Senate Finance Dawdles While Thousands Die Waiting Without Health Care





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

FITZ!
Wilbur!!
OINK!
109th Congress a success at naming buildings
Of the 383 pieces of legislation that were signed into law during the two-year 109th Congress, more than one-quarter dealt with naming or renaming federal buildings and structures — primarily post offices — after various Americans.
It’s hard work!
Welcome back Christy, ’tis clear DC didn’t suck any of the intelligence and reason out of your brain!
What conference did you attend? I mean if you are allowed to say.
What a great shot of Karl Rove in bed!
…or is that Hastert?
Is this not the most adorable little piggy? The picture made me smile, and I thought you guys could use a little grin as well today.
twolf1 @ 7
AHAHAHAHA!
twolf1 @ 4
It’s hard work!
And most of those, I would guess, were to change the name from some New Deal Democrat’s to Ronald Reagan. There must have been a bunch of “Ronald Reagan I-20 Mile Marker 61 Memorial Rest Stop and Shithouse” changes in those….
Infuriating?
Quite.
This kind of thing should be criminalized, retroactively.
egregious at 6 — it was a conference on poverty, inequality, race and the media that was sponsored by the Eisenhower Foundation. I hope to complete my write-up on the conference tomorrow. There was just so much news to catch up on for you guys today and, frankly, I’m still a bit tired from the drive and the meetings, and I wanted to finish my write-up when my brain was a little more fresh.
New Slogan for the War: “Plan For Victery!” (sign hung yesterday in San Francisco)
http://freewayblogger.blogspot…..-1213.html
Ordinarily, cutting tariffs is thought to help consumers more than it helps corporations. Yes, tariff revenue is lost, but tariff revenue has been a shrinking line item for the government at least since World War I. The benefits are shared (to be sure, probably inequitably) among the importers, the manufacturers and the customers; the first two are presumably taxed on at least part of their extra profit, the consumers enjoy lower prices. So why is this such a bad thing?
CHS–Sounds great, not asking for the full report today! Just curious, other people seemed to know where you had been.
And speaking of fresh, piling on to earlier comments that more frequent posts might make things harder on the front pagers, at a time when I think we would like to see you guys have at least a thimble full of time to rest :)
twolf1 @ 7
Not Hastert, no singlet
piglet?
Stuart Eugene Thiel @ 14
Because the laws are constructed to benefit specific companies, rather than all companies selling the same product. And it’s tied to campaign donations, making it good old-fashioned corruption.
I’m good with lower tariffs in general.
Stuart Eugene Thiel @ 14
Hey, I’m all for lower taxes, too, but shouldn’t tax policy be debated in the light of day by members of both parties, rather than a secretive bill being pushed through Congress in the dark of night on the last day of the session?
Looks like a payoff for campaign contributions, among other things.
The public should understand we pay either way. Lets make campaigns publicly financed with balance for all candidates.
Twisted Martini @ 5
IMHO: No shortage of brains at FDL–front-page posters and commenters all! Myriad issues and topics, all covered extensively and thoroughly. So a few hiccups here and there, but who cares? (I’ve been wanting to say this for some time now. So there.)
Stuart at 14 — because a lot of the tariff cutting was done in secret, with multiple layers that added up to a huge, secret pork barrel extravaganza for a few big money campaign donors. Targeted tariff relief has been a feature of governmental action for years — and can help industries who are threatened when other nations provide economic subsidies, etc., to undercut market goods and/or to cause problems for raw materials prices and other bits and pieces that come into play with this. But that was not what happened here — this was a last minute feeding frenzy at the trough for friends of W and K Street — without any due consideration for long-term implications because they were inserted at the last minute.
You tell me why sunshine on this sort of “scratch my crony’s back” is a bad thing? Because I, for one, think that oversight and accountability on this crap has to start somewhere. If the reduction will not stand up to public scrutiny or debate over its merits, then perhaps it ought not to be slipped in at all?
Since you asked:
* Online activism, starting with the primaries and continuing though the general
* Significant campaign donations, mostly to grass roots supported candidates, all but one of whom was a Democrat (I gave to Schumer as well as to Ned)
* Persistently informing my friends and neighbors in my very red state of the abuses
* Pestering my congress critters weekly for everything from “what happened to fiscal responsibility” to “how are you going to feel if the same rules are applied to American POWs?”
* Helping sent a Democrat to the house for my district for the first time in who knows how long, and scaring the bejezus out of our Republican Senator
* Etc.
I am not a Democrat but I am an American first and a Republican second.
–MarkusQ
MarkusQ at 23 — see — now that is a GOOD answer. :)
OfT – but after not paying any attention to TruthOut for some time now – well, they’re in an important one:
military wants reporters’ testimony
Captain Dan Kuecker, the Fort Lewis, Washington-based Army prosecutor, has stated his intent to compel Ash, Truthout reporter Sari Gelzer, and contributors Dahr Jamail and Sarah Olson to testify at the court-martial of First Lieutenant Ehren Watada. Kuecker is actively seeking the journalists’ testimony so he can prove that Watada engaged in conduct unbecoming an officer, directly related to disparaging statements the Army claims Watada made about the legality of the Iraq War during interviews with Truthout and his hometown newspaper, the Honolulu Star-Bulletin, in June.
(Snip)
Ash said he repeatedly referred Kuecker to Truthout attorney Bill Simpich. Ash said in an interview that he is determined to resist any attempt by the US Army to compel him to testify against Watada or to provide the Army with any physical evidence it may seek.
“We view this action as retaliatory, both toward Lieutenant Watada and toward our organization that reported his courageous stand,” Ash said. “Since the day the US invaded Iraq, Truthout has tried to educate the American people about the true reasons for the military action and, more importantly, not only the suffering of the Iraqi people, but the painful and often unnecessary sacrifices of America’s servicemen and women. Opposing the United States Army, even in a courtroom, is a daunting prospect. However, we will not shrink from the task.”
Gotta get Reporters’ Shield Law in place….
Madam Speaker?
OT- Looks like Ben Nelson has his own ideas about chatting with the Syrians.
Seems pretty ballsy to me…
egregious — also, I did a little write-up before I left for the conference that you may have missed. Apparently, part of the conference, if not all of it, was broadcast on C-Span on Tuesday — but I didn’t catch any of it since I was there all day long. *g*
On the topic of pigs – Rove said done with politics once he leaves this White House
twolf1 @ 28
Yeah right.
twolf1 @ 28
Thats because the pig f*cker is radioactive now.
Twisted Martini @ 29
He probably wants a more powerful and more lucrative position, like at Halliburton/KBR or Exxon Mobil
Sadly, No! is offering Two- Minute Townhall.
He got the presidency. When has a political consultant ever had the power he has? Why would he be a consultant after that?
He’ll run a think tank and train little roves who hide their devil horns under little black fedoras as they continue to undermine democracy at incredibly inflated salaries.
twolf1 @ 31
Maybe they can name a sludge treatment facility after him?
twolf1 @
31
I don’t think so. I think he’ll be retiring to spend more time with his legal defense team.
T at 26 – it’s Bill Nelson of Florida talking to the Syrians, not Ben Nelson of Nebraska. Hope all the little Ts are well and congratulations on the one on the way.
On cspan right now, panel discussion of the lamont lieberwurst race, hillsman, lanny, etc.
kristinejoy @ 33
Maybe he could teach all those mini-cons how to get their salaries at taxpayers’ expense?
OT Pach, I left something for you on the ICE raid thread below.
As to the Tariff suspensions, averaged out that’s only 8 per day worked. I shudder to think how many they would have passed had they spent any time actually legislating.
Twisted Martini says
December 14th, 2006 at 11:36 am*
Maybe they can name a sludge treatment facility after him?
And we have a winner!
Or the party of National Security.
Or the party of Values.
Or the party of small government.
Or the party of Patriotism.
Or the party devoted to the rule of law.
Or the party devoted to true Democracy…
I could go on, but it’s quarter to noon here in wet ‘n chilly San Francisco, and I’ve already exceeded my WPM (words per morning).
GOP = the party of treason.
And it’s been that way for a good 8 years, imo.
What do I win? A billion dollar no-bid contract to provide martinis to the Pentagon?
Tony Snow just apologized to David Gregory?
A treacherous tantalizing tempting touting of humanity?
Bush wants another $100 billion for the war:
http://today.reuters.com/news/…..ticlePage2
This should definitively answer the question about whether Bush will completely ignore the ISG Reoprt.
The man is clearly insane.
lemma @ 36
Congrats T-. How many little T’s will that be?
CHS–thanks for catching me up. Guess I was in a typical December brain mush on Monday.
Twisted Martini @
43
Oh jeez. Don’t get ‘em drunk. They’ve done quite enough.
Or maybe, in the new American tradition, you can have the contract – just don’t provide ‘em a goddamm thing.
JF @ 46
lemma – thanks. Yeah, I knew it was B. Nelson (D), but he’ll have a big scapegoat target on his back from now and get the blame when everything turns to shit with Syria, nonetheless.
JF – This will make 3 little Ts. Big little T had his Christmas program at the church today. It was cute seeing all the 4 year olds singing at the top of their lungs. Middle little T had to go play in the pews up in the balcony because he was nonplussed that he couldn’t join his big brother up on stage. Little little T should be here at the beginning of August.
Anyone like babysitting in the ATL area?
jayt @ 41
Yeah, but Dave Barry already did this. Up north somewhere.
OT–All Tim Johnson has to do is stay alive for the Dems to keep control of the Senate:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/johnson
Joe Biden was also incapacitated for 8 months after his aneurysm and retained his seat. Strom Thormund also for stretches of time.
egregious @ 50
Oh.
(walkin’ away, feelin’ all deflated).
jayt @ 48
How I substitute some shitty alcohol instead of gin so that they all go blind, like the Russian soldiers used to? I can also substitute balls of SPAM painted green for olives. Won’t know the difference.
OT:
Well, Steve tells us that Michelle’s going to Baghdad.
http://stevegilliard.blogspot……ppens.html
I don’t want her to get hurt while she’s there, just maybe get the shit scared out of her.
mc @
54
Let me know if she needs any help with airfare.
Biodun @ 51
If I’m not mistaken, a Republican congressman from GA has been out for quite a while with health problems and has not resigned. He may have even run for and won reelection.
There was a time when “conservative” meant “pay as you go”. Now it seems to mean “spend your childrens’ money”.
Just wrote a little slop myself this morning that I thought I’d share, although it’s a bit off the subject:
CURRENT e-VENTS
Tom Delay is blogging-
his message: “I is risen!”
I wonder if they have high-speed
internet in prison?
Newt is gonna be president,
if the people MAKE him do it!
-That old “Contract With America”?
It’s expired. We won’t renew it.
A REQUIEM FOR REPUBLICANS
Pinochet may have had his own sweet side,
though he tended to rise on the wrong side of bed
his own daughter believed he’d had nothing to hide-
she’d not seen all he’d hidden
inside
of the dead
Mean Jean Kirkpatrick, arrogant ’til the end
counted Augusto as her special friend
Milton Friedman awaits them with good news to tell-
the market is booming
like the fires of hell
There is one place they’ll always be in the majority-
where Republicans never feel inferiority
with rich lobbyists and plenty of preachers to spare
and Ronald Reagan
is forever president-
down there
T- @ 49
What a delightful image!
It is interesting about the Syria thing – Specter, Dodd and Kerry are going soon, too. Kinda in your face to me.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/…..00961.html
Ahh, gee, Pickles is upset… with the media.
All that feeding at the public trough doesn’t leave a lot for social spending and human needs. Fortunately, the poor don’t actually seem to need much: The Dr. Pangloss “Best of All Possible Worlds” Award goes to David Brooks for writing that “In general, poor people today live at about the same standard of living as middle-class people did in the 1960s.” Relying on American Enterprise Institute research certainly clarifies matters, doesn’t it?
Scarecrow’s offering a new thread upstairs.
Oops. Here’s a functioning version of the The Dr. Pangloss “Best of All Possible Worlds” Award goes to David Brooks link.
Re: Tim Johnson
The GOP (or should I say the guys *behind the GOP?) are not going to let Congress be controlled by the Democrats. It doesn’t matter who they have to kill, someone will just have to have a “stroke” or a “heart attack” or be killed in another one of the plane crashes that Republicans never seem to be in but one way or another, they will retain control.
It’s funny how with every new day, reality sounds more and more like a paranoid’s dream. I mean, even now it’s difficult for *sensible* people to grasp the notion that Paul Wellstone was murdered so that they would control the Senate. People will look at you as if you’re mad if you mention the fact that Patsy Mink died of what look very much like some form of biowarfare. The fact that the most liberal Senator and the most liberal member of the House happened to die within a month of each other, and on the heels of a Democrats only anthrax attack…seems to fly right over the heads of even intelligent folks.
When you stop and think of the potential profits that the shadow government (the military industrial complex) hopes to make from the eternal war that they are trying so hard to start, you begin to see just how dangerous our present environment is. Think of how much money we put into agencies like the CIA and just what kind of resources that money buys. Now reflect on the notion that a shadow government would have virtually the same tools, perhaps even MORE sophisticated tools, with which to remove any “obstacles” to their plans. They can fabricate a murder that will appear like just about any disease you could name and buy off any number of Doctors and legal officials to back it all up. Such is the power you have when you own the printing presses that churn out money. You see, they can pay *any* price that might be required, and if anyone were to threaten to reveal the plot, well they simply print a few more millions and buy the best assassin/clean-up teams in existence. Nice racket, huh?
So don’t get any fancy ideas of the good things that Democrats are going to do…. they aren’t going to do a damn thing but cheer for President-for-Life Bush when he announces that he’s just massively nuked Iran… because not to would be dangerously un-American. Wouldn’t it? Don’t you have even the slightest curiosity as to why we’re being told that Bushie will reveal his plans for Iraq “next year”? It’s because (you big silly!) by next year, the Democrats will know that they won’t control Congress, and even promising not to impeach clown-boy wasn’t enough to let Democracy work as planned. *That* my friends, will never happen again. “Democracy” is a thing of the past and we’ll never see it’s face again.
Pigs at the trough? Cronyism? There’s a worldwide epidemic of it all.
British Prime Minister Blair Quizzed By Cops In ‘Questionable’ Cash Case …