
William Arkin, at the WaPo's Early Warning Blog, catches an interesting tell in Bush's presser yesterday:
Extremist-in-chief George W. Bush yesterday continued along his merry way, going over the heads of the wise men and defying Washington moderation and the glories of bipartisan centrism to remind the American public that he is also the protector."The only way to secure a lasting peace for our children and grandchildren is to defeat the extremist ideologies," the president said.
Mark his words: the only way.
Those yearning for a tidier world can produce studies and recommendations galore, but the president firmly believes he is the one who has to deal with the real world, and that he and not the ivory tower uniquely understands how dangerous it is.
Thus we are witnessing the emergence of a new divide in American politics. It is no longer Democrats vs. Republicans or withdrawers vs. stay-the-coursers. The majority, bucked up by strong majority in American public opinion, is clearly in favor of change. In English, that means it's over in Iraq.
The new battleground will be between the believers and the non-believers. Bush and Cheney command the believers, who remain the custodians of the Sept. 11 aesthetic that America and the world are threatened, leaving no room for niceties and togetherness.
But it is not just Bush and Cheney, and the Washington-New York-Hollywood axis should take notice. The protectors are mobilizing. They see American "will" dwindling and think they need to do something about it.
In our naïve ways, we might believe that that means they have to change policy. But in the ways of national security, the protectors believe just the opposite.... (emphasis mine)
Go read the whole thing. I enjoy keeping up with Arkin's blog, despite not agreeing with it half the time because he is much more aggressive tactics-wise than even I am when it comes to enforcement issues, because he always catches bits and pieces of national security chatter to which I have no access. But which always makes for a great read. (The fact that the wingnut brigades have shown up to denounce him each and every time he has any criticism about the Bush Administration's misuse of national security personnel or tactics, or denouncing missteps made by the Administration? Well, that just makes me want to link him up that much more.)
And while you are contemplating the potential for George Bush and his Administration and supporters to stay within the bubble of their own making, take a peek at Digby's discussion of their underpinnings. Add to that a dose of Gilliard, and a bit of Watertiger for good measure.
Repeat after me: two more years. But just in case, let us all give thanks for January's resumption of Congressional oversight...and hope that somehow, some way, we can all make it until then.
(Blergh...is it too early for Teddy to open the bar?)
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Fisk
It is never to early for an Akvavit; skoal!
Is there an over/under yet on how long Gates is going to last? Reality-based Cabinet members don’t seem to last too long these days.
The dangerous part is that military force seems to be the only means by which Bush heads down “the only way” to secure this peace.
Tragically, Bush keeps saying that this is an ideological struggle, but he’s using everything BUT ideology to fight it.
EPU’d
In the last thread, Frank Probst made an interesting point regarding Waxman’s inevitable investigation in the event that Bush pardons Libby.
I would love to hear Jane and Christy share their thoughts on whether and how the shift in congressional power to the Democrats will effect the dynamics and strategy of the legal teams on both sides of the Libby case.
Did the events of November 7 critically damage Libby’s hopes of a pardon?
If so, how will the decreased likelihood of a pardon change Libby’s willingness to cut a deal with Fitzgerald?
These are complex questions that I would love to see dissected here at FDL at some point.
Kos is hammering NARAL too. Good to see.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/12/8/12178/0511
two more years.
Frank Probst @ 3
I’d say about 1-1/2 to 2 FU’s.
I had the joy of seein this as the top headline on this morning’s LA Times:
Bush not swayed by Iraq study
with the sub-article:
Conservatives incensed over panel’s findings
No connection to reality, as far as I can tell. And no idea of any way out, either. Bush saying we have to win before we can leave - Earth to Shrub: let’s declare it a victory and get out. You got your pet dictator out, you got your democraticly-elected government in Iraq, you got zero WMD there, so you got everything you said you wanted done.
(I’d have gotten a drink, but it was only 6am and the coffee place wasn’t open yet.)
epu’d, too and skoal, Dru!
OT– but I just saw this interview with a former fellow of the Carter center who criticized Jimmy Carter and his new book even alleging plagiarism on msnbc and went digging a bit because of my dismay and of course the interview was entirely without the context below.
http://www.latimes.com/news/na.....nes-nation
JF @ 8
That long? I’ll go with 1FU.
And ya know what? He’s absolutely right.
I suggest we start with the extremist ideology of the Republican party.
Good Morning All
Roddy McCorley @ 12
AMEN
*xyz @ 6
Can anyone explain to me why we should take NARAL–or HRC, for that matter–seriously? Both groups seem to be fighting for the right to sit in the back of the bus. Why are people wasting their money on them?
*xyz @
5
Here’s a foolish layman’s question for those constitutional law experts out there. Is a Presidential pardon assailable in any legal fashion? For instance, could a 2/3 majority vote in both houses overturn a Presidential pardon under the weight of investigations showing undeniable crimes and misdemeanors?
johnSwifty at 15 — no.
NEVER! The FDL Martini lounge is always open, especially for those who pays the bills around here.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 16
Which is why no one (except Scooter) wants to see it.
At what point does the US understand that Captain Georgie and First Mate Dick are trying to find the missing strawberries and put these guys in protective custody???
I just had a vision of Hawkeye and Trapper going into Henry’s office.
Frank Rich said it best last Sunday: Bush is “untethered from reality.”
Now what does that mean strictly in DSM terms? Bush is psychotic. He needs both shock therapy and (given his “family relations”) deep psychoanalysis.
PS: The dictionary at http://www.dictionary.com
defines “psychosis” as a “mental disorder such as delusions or hallucinations, that indicate impaired contact with reality.”
I just read an excellent diary on Daily Kos that provides an additional perspective to this post.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyo.....17173/4604
I think there is there a lot of merit in the thought that we have two madmen in control and I only hope we can survive two more years.
Frank Probst @ 14
I think that NARAL and HRC rely on low-information donors. Like Liberman relied on low-information Democrats.
The blogs are doing everything they can to educate people about NARAL and HRC, but there are plenty of people who don’t yet realize how these organizations undermine the causes they purport to advance.
IANAL… BIDSAAHILN - Pardons May Be Voided For Criminal Prosecutions Flowing From “Cases of Impeachment
The Constitution Voids Presidential Pardons For Criminal Convictions Or Indictments Flowing From “Cases of Impeachment” Where The Senate Has Voted To Convict.
johnSwifty @ 15
The general view is that pardons are absolute. However, I don’t think that all of the possible scenarios have been explored. My guess is that the Supreme Court would have to rule if there was an odd case. There’s a clause in the Constitution that says “except in cases of impeachment”. I suspect that you could try to impeach someone after they’ve been pardoned and thus void the pardon. It’s uncharted legal territory.
I can only think of 1 way in which the CHIMP and his cabal can save face, reject the recommendations of the ISG, and either remain in Iraq or not (in their sole discretion and on their own timetable).
Conspiratorial assumption that the CHIMP and his cabal will stop at nothing to retain power. Were our country subjected to another terrorist attack, you can only begin to guess at the level of consolidation of governmental authority this administration would seek, and the level of hubris and arrogance that would follow.
Just my dumb opinion from Flori-DUH.
Nice take on the ISG report by hilzoy
over at Obsidian Wings.
See also this.
Twobits @ 22
Like a pressure cooker has a safety pressure release valve, I think the American public is only going to put up with so much.
Clusterfucks JAR is down to 27%.
There isn’t much farther he can go.
By ignoring the ISG, he is walking in a minefield.Iraq is lost.Afghanistan basically also.
Just how long are we as a people , going to continue to tolerate this mans folly?
Christy Hardin Smith @ 16
Well, then, you throw in a Patriot Act; a new and improved definition of the power of a signing statement; a few other newly found presidential capabilities (thanks to some creative constitutional interpretations) and you’ve got yourself quite a little mafia ring…er, despotism…er, totalitarian regime thingy…or something.
Then, if you got the get out of jail free card to trump…mark it with a ‘W’ and stick ‘er in the oven, ’cause she’s DONE!
Angie @ 10..I had to be at out-patient surgery at 7:15 AM and Fox “News” was on the TeeVee. Ken Stein “Carter makes shit up, yak yak” The Fox jerk
“Carter is a liar, yak, yak” It was Likud-AIPAC, major push-back against Carter. IMHO, no American has made Israel more safe then Carter and this is the thanks he gets.
Digby on the NARAL-minded folks:
(bold added)
This is so totally OT, but why the press about Chelsea Clinton’s possible, maybe, potential father-in-law? With pic of Chelsea… quid pro quo for media coverage of the slu**y Bush *wins? nyah, nyah, yours is too?
And props to Norah O’Donnell for pulling a KO this week and saying she was diverging from interviewing two of the ISG participants to talk about Britney’s no-pants because “the producers are making me do this.”
’bout time.
Frank Probst @ 25
If the only good thing to come out of this authoritarian nightmare is a better legal definition of “Presidential Powers” and a modern system of check and balance in keeping with the ideas of the founding fathers; well, I’ll take it at face value rather than accept the fact that the country has spent 6-8 years sliding in decline.
dragging this from Late Nite to the light of day:
punaise @
109
punaise @ 33
I used to read DailyKos hourly (hourly Kos); and the information there is still some of the best in the blogosphere — no doubt. But, there is only so much time in the day and FDL offers a more colloquial bend; in short, I am a much less depressed person here. So I, for one, would be very appreciative of active cross posting from those intelligent folks who have time, energy and inclination to move in multiple blogoshperes. Thanks in advance.
It seems to me with the recommendations of the ISG the Beltway is coming to the conclusion that this isn’t just politics, that in fact we now have leadership that is incapable of implementing the recommendations of the group. Bush brokering peace in the ME? Give me a break, no one on any side of the issue can even picture it.
Everyone except Bush seems scared shitless of two more years of stay the course, because Bush does not have the capacity to change.
Who is Teddy?
Where is the bar?
I think there was a typo - some letters were dropped.
CNN - Hastert re the Foley ethics report release today at 2pm eastern - “i don’t know if i have to be concerned or not. in my heart, i think i will be exonerated.”
the report will be their conclusion, not an update.
lisadawn at 36 — I’m speaking of TeddySanFran, who always seems to have the perfect martini. ;)
EPU at 37 — Have I mentioned how happy I am that you have time to comment again? We’d missed you. :)
There appears to be a typo in Arkin’s article:
Bush and Cheney command the believers, who remain the custodians of the Sept. 11 aesthetic that America and the world are threatened
should read in part “of the Sept. 11 anesthetic…”
No. But of course I knew that. Check your email. :)
punaise - I agree with John Swifty. Frankly it’s an important part of the FDL comments because the pups are so good at digging up T-bones.
What are your thoughts?
punaise @ 33
Count me in on the pro side of this question, with the usual caution to stick to snippets and please include links.
Often a link with a too cryptic comment may go unexplored, while an intriguing quote works to whet the appetite.
*xyz @ 5
The greymail ain’t over yet folks. Last night I finished reading the not very redacted version of Walton’s CIPA decision.
There are still a lot of still classified documents in play.
twolf1 @
24
If the conditions are “flowing from impeachment and conviction” does that limit the relationship to the particular charge? If Cheney is impeached for corruption with federal contracts and convicted would that void a (even pre-emptive) Libby pardon for activities in outing Plame?
EPU’d:
The first of what may end up being a dozen arrests of Alaska GOP legislators and energy industry power brokers occurred yesterday afternoon in Anchorage:
Federal authorities arrested state Rep. Tom Anderson on Thursday on “public corruption” charges, the FBI said. Anderson was still in custody at the Anchorage Jail this morning.
FBI spokesman Eric Gonzalez said further details would be available from the Department of Justice Friday with the release of the federal charging documents.
Gonzalez only would say that there was a federal warrant for Anderson’s arrest “in connection with a public corruption probe.” Anderson was arrested around 4:30 p.m. Thursday at his home, Gonzalez said.
Anderson, who was elected to the state House four years ago to represent Muldoon but did not seek re-election in November, kept up his original consulting business as an adviser for clients who do business with state and local government.
He is married to state Rep. Lesil McGuire, R-Anchorage, who was elected to the state Senate in November. McGuire could not be reached for comment, but Anderson’s father, Tom Anderson, former director of the Alaska State Troopers, told the Associated Press, “No comment” when contacted Thursday night.
http://www.adn.com/news/politi.....8881c.html
Anderson wasn’t one of the legislators whose offices were searched by the FBI back in August and September.
For those interested in how this may have an impact on the five-day old gubernatorial administration of Sarah Palin, I would estimate it will have NO impact directly on it. She ran in and won the GOP primary as an severe critic of the kind of corruption and cronyism which will be highlighted by these arrests as they roll out.
So, to be on topic here - an arrest accompanied by a night in jail for a GOP crook is always better than a mere subpoena…
johnSwifty @ 15
I don’t think anyone has ever tried.
Heh, teh snark.
Farewell to 109th: They Took So Much — But Boy, Did They Give
By Justin Rood - December 8, 2006, 11:53 AM
Oh, you sweet 109th Congress. We hate to see you go!
That’s a minority opinion, of course. Some three-quarters of Americans think you’ve done a horrible job. Some even say, with all your (admitted) boozing, (alleged) whoring and (convicted) extortion, you’re the worst Congress ever. And frankly, if we didn’t know you so well, we’d probably agree with them.
snip
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/
BAR IS OPEN!
[sorry for the delay]
…orders?
TeddySanFran @ 50
Double martini, no olive thanks.
punaise and johnSwifty:
Yeah, cross-posting is great. I for one prefer FDL to dKos. FDL is more “readable” on many levels, IMHO.
jeffreyw @ 44
Eureka Springs, AR @ 43
jeffreyw - great observations. links always, of course, and respect for fair usage. and most people probably slide right by the oblique references.
ESAR - in general I like the practice, but I wouldn’t want to belabor the obvious if it’s likely that folks have already seen stuff elsewhere. also, there is the risk of the “echo chamber” effect.
Part of the believers vs non-believers dichotomy depends on how one defines reality. What do you believe? Compare these two stories of the same event:
An AP story is entitled “Coalition forces kill 20 insurgents, but the first paragraph tells a different story:
The Reuters version is entitled, Iraqis, US dispute deadly raid in new friction, and it’s lead paragraph says:
Given the dubious elections in both 2000 and 2004, Bush and Cheney were never into democracy that much anyway. 911 was a disaster but for them it proved a godsend giving Bush the highest JARs of his Presidency and a blank check. 5 years on and even after the rejection of their policies in the November elections, he and Cheney are still trying to cash that check.
Then there is the psychological aspect. Bush is ignorant, opinionated, intellectually limited, and stubborn. In the 6 years of his Presidency, he has shown no capacity for flexibility or pragmatism. It would be wrong to expect for him to do that now. Bush will not change until he does just as he is fiercely loyal to those around him, until he isn’t. Just ask Paul O’Neill, Colin Powell, George Tenant, Paul Bremer, Andrew Card, and Donald Rumsfeld.
just a few quick notes re: psychosis.
I)”psychosis” is a clinical state in which the patient has perceptions and/or beliefs that do not reflect testable reality.
A)psychotic perceptions include a range of possible symptoms:
1)Hallucinations - Non-real perceptions experienced through the five senses (auditory, visual, tactile, olfactory, gustatory)
2)Delusions - Non-valid cognitions (thoughts).
[specific forms of delusions may include:
a: paranoid - Non-valid perceptions of threat
b: grandiose - Non-valid perceptions of immense capacity
c: religious - Non-valid perceptions of one’s own apotheosis or divinity
(the third seldom occurs without the second; I’ve yet to encouter patients with delusional deities of humility…)]
II) Psychotic perceptions may be caused by temporary conditions (medications, recreational substances, infection, severe dehydration, etc, ad infinitum) or permanent conditions (either primary central nervous system disease [tumors; atypical seizure disorders] or psychiatric diagnoses).
III) Psychotic perceptions may be symptoms in several types of psychiatric illness, including dementia (Alzheimer’s, multi-infarct); affective disorder (severe bipolar disorder or depression); and thought disorders (schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and delusional disorder).
IV) Psychotic symptooms are the core diagnostic element required for a diagnosis of one of the thought disorders.
V) Current effective treatment of thought disorders requires medication and (where possible) supportive and/or cognitive therapy. As severe forms of schizophrenia may demonstrate progressive cognitive decline, electo-convulsive therapy (shock therapy) would be containdicated for treatment of a chronic disorder.
[ECT does have demonstrated efficacy in some episodes of bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and major depression otherwise refractory to medications.]
TeddySanFran @ 50
still working on my a.m. coffee; can I get a rain check?
perhaps we could invent some in-house cocktails; examples:
- “The Friday afternoon news dump” (designed by Peterr?)
- “Jump the snark”
- “Supboena collada”
punaise @ 58
sloe gin fitz
- “Supboena collada”
Now there is a classic.
Biodun @ 52
I think of FDL as like being at one of those parties where everybody winds up in the kitchen. Visiting Kos is like standing in a packed auditorium amidst the roaring din. I poke my head into the auditorium a few times a day, but I spend more time in the kitchen.
But it is not just Bush and Cheney, and the Washington-New York-Hollywood axis should take notice. The protectors are mobilizing. They see American “will” dwindling and think they need to do something about it.
I don’t suppose this “will” will lead to them or theirs into enlisting, will it?
Bustednuckles @ 59
it’s “served” with one of those little paper umbrellas
Elite Force Aviator: George W. Bush 12″ Figure
-via wonkette
Re pardon power exception. “In cases of impeachment”–I’m thinking this means that the President cannot prevent an impeachment via pardon, nor can he void a conviction and penalty that flows from that impeachment. The only punishment via conviction from an impeachment is removal from office, and a bar on further office.
The president can keep you out of jail, but can’t give you your job back.
kirk murphy @57: Wow! No further comment necessary.
punaise @ 62
You are too much dude, I love it.
If its too early for alcohol, today looks like a good day to break out the Flaming Foley Fruit Punch.
With Bush in power we are in the position of backseat passengers in a car driven at 100 mph by somebody drunk out of his mind.
We can’t get him to pull over. All we can do is wave out the window to attract attention, hoping somebody will call the cops. And tighten our seatbelts, hoping we survive the inevitable crash.
scarecrow @ 54
That is pathetic of the AP. They are shills. My guess is they will carry that headline until the afternoon news dump hour 3:00PM EDT. Then correct it quietly.
The question no WaPoO chatter would take this week: When do the GOP solons trek up PennAve to tell the BoyKing he’s got to save their party and the country? Just like Hugh Scott, Howard Baker, and Barry Goldwater told RMN it was time to go. You know BoyKing’s talking to the portraits and praying on his knees in the middle of his pretty sunburst rug in the Oval.
No one touched this question — which I dressed up by calling him President Bush and with lotsa “thanks for chatting,” “love your column,” “best political blog.”
Methinks there must be a group of Senior GOP Senators ready to make the call. Stevens, Warner, McConnell?
kristinejoy @ 68
Same recipe as MIchael Jackson’s Jesus Juice, right?
White House is serving Sham Pain.
twolf1 @ 58
Lieber-sour
and a
pale gray mail ale
you’re killing my desk chair, punaise, it’s not built for repeated 707s!
impeachment schnapps
deadeye’s having shots of anything he can spot.
kristinejoy at 68 — you just made me spew my tea…
alla y’all !
From Alaska GOP Rep. Tom Anderson’s arraignment this morning:
A federal grand jury has indicted an Alaska lawmaker on charges of extortion, conspiracy, bribery, and money laundering, federal officials said Friday.
A seven-count indictment was returned against state Rep. Thomas T. Anderson, R-Anchorage, on Wednesday, assistant Attorney General Alice S. Fisher said. Anderson was arrested Thursday, and was being held at the city jail.
The indictment charges Anderson with two counts of extortion, one count of bribery, one count of conspiracy, and three counts of money laundering in connection with the use of a sham corporation to hide the identity of the bribery payments, Fisher said in a prepared statement.
The indictment also alleges that Anderson solicited and received money from an FBI confidential source in exchange for Anderson’s agreement to perform official acts to further a business interest represented by the confidential source.
http://www.adn.com/news/politi.....9942c.html
This story is minutes old. I can’t imagine Alice Fisher making a public statement about this unless there are more indictments - more important indictments - coming. She’s on the make and will want to use this as one of the demonstrations that her ongoing public corruption probes with DoJ/FBI are productive.
TeddySanFran @ 70
I don’t think any of them have the spine.
kirk murphy,
Shorter psychosis:
Psychosis is not when Bush talks to the walls. It’s when they start talking back.
Hooray, ET!
Just got this from Sen. Feingold’s office — looks like they have reinstated the IG in Iraq:
“I am pleased that Congress has fixed the mistake of shutting down the office of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction prematurely. The office has proven to be an effective tool in uncovering waste, fraud and abuse of U.S. taxpayer dollars in Iraq and needs to continue its valuable work. The President should quickly sign this bill into law to ensure sufficient oversight of billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars being spent on reconstruction efforts in Iraq.”
Read more here.
punaise @
54
.
I’d suggest the risk of the echo chamber is offset by expanding each other’s horizons and helping to drive traffic to our web friends. Most of us stumbled on FDL from somewhere else. It’s only fair to share the wealth.
I love reading Watertiger’s Face the Snark, in part, because it introduces me to sites I might not have found otherwise.
If the web is viral, does a new link a day keep the trolls away?
Exciting news in Alaska, ET, please keep us informed. I am a little suspicious of Alice Fisher’s involvement; hasn’t she been very effective at keeping indictments limited to one person (e.g. Safavian) rather than seeking expansive relationships that are indictable (e.g. Rollins)?
Aren’t there a bunch of investigations that should POP soon, and haven’t yet due to Alice? I’m thinking Weldon, Frist, Lewis, Doolittle, the Ohio GOP, etc.
The people in charge, such as 41, Rummy, Cheney, Gates and many others have had involvement in psychological programs, operations and other forms of non-lethal warfare. Gates used different forms of psych manipulation in Afghanistan against the Soviets and Rummy has had no qualms using drugs on detainees.
One way or the other, a major mind manipulation has been done on Junior that would parallel the tactics used in these programs. With all of the information about him living in a bubble, consider the aspect that his form of captivity has been successful for carrying out the operators plans, until recently.
ET - This is going to be good! Thanks for the updates.
Hugh - Caught your post a bit late yesterday. Great to see you up top.
kirk murphy - Would Bush Jr. telling the President of France that God told him to invade Iraq , qualify?
Christy– did bush sign it? I can’t find the confirmation of that in the link.
(I still want to know for sure who inserted his removal it into the legislation)
(From what I have witnessed of the networks this morning, it sure looks like the ISG and the presser have been eclipsed by Wesley Snipes and lotsa nonsense.)
Friday’s happy hour….
Sex On The Beach
Ingredients 1 oz Vodka
1 oz Peach Schnapps
1 oz raspberry mix
2/3 orange juice
1/3 cranberry juice
Jack
‘ere!!
RBG @ 84
if you’re going to, uhhh, peal to our core instincts, that might stem the tide….
angie @ 82
I’ll take a double of that.
TeddySanFran @ 51
That would be a Captain and Coke. Yummy.
TeddySanFran #70,
John Warner might. McConnell has been a bootlicking shill all his life and it just isn’t in him.
Also re McConnell, did anyone else notice that McConnell immediately upon his election as Minority Senate leader said that the Democrats would need 60 votes to pass anything? For the last 6 years, Senate Democrats have been beaten over the head by Republicans over the filibuster and yet when the Republicans go into the minority it is the first thing they bring up.
Hugh @ 81
Bush says, “I hear the voices and I read the front page …
cnn - via AP - leaders broke no rules in foley scandal. but, were negligent in protecting the teenagers
Hugh @ 95
new-kem
jeffreyw @ 96
LOL. Case closed.
Hugh @ 94
shorter McConnell:
we’ll insist on “up yours, down” votes