
Historical analogies are imprecise thing, at best. This isn't 1842 or 1940, 1944 or 1950. Every battle, every war, is different, and they end differently. So by looking back at Dien Bieh Phu or Mang Yang Pass or Chosin, we are not saying this is what will happen.
But history also repeats, and those thing which have happened, can happen again.
Now, you may have heard of the Chosin Resevoir in connection with the war in Iraq, but aren't clear about what it means. In November 1950, the US Army X Corps was attacking near the Chosin Reservoir in North Korea. On the evening ot the 27th elements of the Chinese Fourth Route Army crashed into US lines and sent them retreating. During the retreat, US forces had to fend off several attacks on their lines, with road blocks and massive human wave attacks.

Here is the Wikipedia entry on the battle:
Around 30,000 UN troops clashed with approximately 70,000 Chinese soldiers. In fierce fighting that lasted until 11 December, there were 15,000 UN casualties (7,500 to cold related injuries) and possibly 40,000 Chinese casualties (mostly to cold related injuries) as the UN forces withdrew to Hungnam.
On the eastern side of the Chosin Reservoir however, a 3,000-man composite U.S. Army task force from the 7th Infantry Division, RCT 31 ( Task Force Faith), was isolated by two reinforced Chinese divisions (over 17,000) which were en route to finish off the garrison at Hagaru-ri. Worn down by incessant attacks, RCT 31 was virtually destroyed. Nine members of RCT 31 were awarded the Distinguished Service Cross, the Army's second highest award for valor. Survivors from this unit reached Marine lines at Hagaru-ri on December 2, 1950. Some survivors of RCT 31 and other army units including an army tank company and combat engineers, joined Smith's forces and participated in the breakout. Keeping his units concentrated and moving deliberately, Smith made an aggressive assault to break out of the reservoir. When asked if the Marines were retreating, Smith explained that their fighting withdrawal through Chinese lines did not constitute a retreat. His explanation was abbreviated into the famous misquote, "Retreat, hell! We're attacking in a different direction!" (recalling the famous quote from Captain Lloyd Williams at Belleau Wood during the First World War, "Retreat, hell! We just got here!").
Task Force Drysdale
In mid-November 1950, the roughly 300 men of 41 Independent Commando, Royal Marines Battalion, under the command of Lieutenant Colonel Douglas B. Drysdale, were attached to the U.S. 1st Marine Division. This marked the second time that U.S. Marines and Royal Marines had served together. (The first time was during the Boxer Rebellion.)
41 Commando had been at Koto-ri with Colonel Chesty Puller's 1st Marine Regiment when the Chinese attacked. On the morning of November 29, Major General O.P. Smith, Commanding General of the 1st Marine Division, ordered Puller to send a task force to open up the road between Koto-ri and Hagaru-ri, where the majority of the division was. The breakthrough force was composed of Drysdale's 41 Royal Commando, Captain Carl Sitter's G Company, 3rd Battalion 1st Marines (G/3/1), B Company, 31st Infantry Regiment, and various Headquarters and Services Marines. All totaled, the task force was around 900 men and 140 vehicles.
The task force struck out of Koto-ri at 0930 hours on November 29 and by 1630 hours, had advanced only half way to its objective, due to stiff enemy resistance—halfway to Hagaru-ri the Chinese ambushed the task force and cut it to pieces. The units of the Task Force had become bogged down, separated and were not in radio contact in an area later named "Hell Fire Valley" by Lieutenant Colonel Drysdale. After being reinforced by tanks from D Company, 1st Tank Battalion, Drysdale contacted Smith at Hagaru-ri and was told to "Press on at all costs." Drysdale responded by stating, "Very well, then: we'll give them a show." He passed word that they were going to run the gauntlet to Hagaru-ri.
Later that evening, most of the men from 41 Commando, Sitter's Marines, and the tanks from D Company arrived at Hagaru-ri, with a wounded Drysdale entering the division command post to announce "41 Commando present for duty." In the confusion along the road, roughly 400 members of Task Force Drysdale were still left stranded and out of radio contact in Hell Fire Valley and completely surrounded by vastly numerically superior Chinese forces. For his leadership and valor, Captain Sitter was awarded the Medal of Honor, one of eleven Chosin Marines so honored.
The still-stranded forces were composed of about 60 Royal Marines, most of B Company 31st Infantry Regiment, and the assorted Headquarters and Services Marines, strung out in four pockets along roughly two-thirds of a mile. Most of these men were killed, wounded or taken prisoner. A few were able to pass through Chinese lines and make it back to Koto-ri. During the night, army Lieutenant Alfred J. Anderson of B Company, 1/31 Infantry, regrouped those of his company that he could find into a defensive perimeter. Twice, he closed with enemy soldiers and killed them at arm's length, deflecting their weapons with one arm as he used his pistol. Early on the morning of November 30, Anderson received orders to withdraw those troops under his control. He led them back safely to Koto-ri.
Of the 900 men of Task Force Drysdale, approximately 300 arrived at Hagaru-ri, 300 were killed or wounded and about 135 were taken prisoner, with the rest making it back to Koto-ri. Seventy-five of the 141 vehicles were also destroyed. Some considered the mission poorly conceived and doomed from the start. Major General Smith was not so quick to write it off however, saying that it was at least a partial success because it delivered over 300 seasoned infantrymen and a tank company to the beleaguered defenses at Hagaru-ri. [1]
Final phases of the battle
In their withdrawal, US troops were either attacking—conducting numerous assaults to clear Chinese roadblocks and overlooking hill positions—or under furious Chinese attack themselves. The sub-zero temperatures inflicted even more casualties than the Chinese (who also suffered greatly from the extreme cold). US forces enjoyed total air supremacy, with Navy, Marine, and Air Force fighter-bombers flying hundreds of sorties a day against the encircling Chinese. Over 4,000 wounded were flown out and 500 replacements flown in during the operation, contributing considerably to its success. The Marines and soldiers were able to destroy or effectively disable all seven Chinese divisions that tried to block their escape from the reservoir. Despite the effort of many Marines, whose plight attracted world-wide attention and was seized on by the western media as a "moral victory" in the midst of defeat, the strategic situation was now highly unfavorable for UN forces and it was decided to withdraw the entire X Corps from North Korea. The Marines, the rest of X Corps, and thousands of civilian refugees were soon evacuated by ship from the port of Hungnam, which was then destroyed to deny its use to the communists.
When people use this analogy in terms of Iraq, what they mean is that the US will have to engage in a rolling battle south from Baghdad, with Iraqis mining and sniping and occassionally attacking US forces. Now, when I first mentioned this possibility three years ago:
Thursday, October 16, 2003
Failure is an option
http://stevegilliard.blogspot.com/2003/10/failure-is-option-clearly-bush.html
..................................
The degree of control and violence is different, but all three mean the end of US control of Iraq. There are too many guns and RPGs and too few employed people for the US tonsurvive any mass uprising without killing thousands of Iraqis in street massacres. There is no center, no Iraqi figure with enough respect to aid the US and those that are respected want the US gone.
Someone said unless there is a miracle in Iraq, Bush is in trouble. The real issue will be how great will the coming disaster be. Will we run like the Chosin Reservoir, walk away like Suez or have some kind of madncollapse like Vietnam. We won't be in Iraq for years. We haven't got enough troops to enforce our will. The only reason we're still there is the patience of the Shia and that will end, oh, starting next with with the start of Ramadan.
And again in 2004:
http://stevegilliard.blogspot.com/2004/11/chosin-ii.htm
What he's talking about is a repeat of the Chinese intervention of 1950, a scenario I have raised for months. He uses Syracuse, but the spectre he's creating is one of Chosin. I worry less about a destruction of the US Army than a brutal fighting retreat to Kuwait and Turkey. The scale of the disaster would dwarf Chosin because of the loss of billions of modern equipment. The policy defeat would be catastrophic as well. The Europeans clearly would be the dominant power in the Middle East for at least a decade.

So this hasn't been a new concern of mine. But the issue is not so much the Iraqi forces we might face, but the ability to move US equipment outside the country, Much of it would have to be abandoned in place or along the way to distract the guerrillas. If you look at the map of Chosin, you'll note that it is steep mountains and narrow valleys. Iraq is a very different place, far more open, but in the end, we have a long way to go and very little cover.
One of the things Americans have to get over is their belief in American superiority. An American army can be decimated in a retreat, even by an enemy without airpower. The problem for the US Army in any retreat from Iraq will be the thousands of Iraqis who will want to flee with them and the thousands of POG's people other than grunts, who will be in that convoy. They might not do so well when they're attacked.
Looking at the roads of Iraq, there are only a few routes south, and they can be blocked and fought over. Which makes leaving in a fighting retreat difficult.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
“0″
Merry Christmas! Or whatever.
Hows about that!
I asked Steve to do this post because he’d been devloping the topic over at his blog and it fit in nicely with what Joe Wilson suggested here last week, that Americans may have to fight their way out. Since Joe is going to be here tomorrow to chat (11am PT/2pm ET) I thought people might appreciate it.
Hope you can stop by and ask him some questions, Steve. Now THAT should be interesting.
If one likes maps, take a look at the Israeli map of Palestine.
I believe it was Mark Twain who once said that “History may not repeat itself, but it does rhyme.”
The map in Jimmy Carter’s book would be a nice place to start.
Been thinking along those lines too. Only Dien Bien Phu came to mind, with the French overconfident in their air superiority as we were expected to believe in our hitech ability to “shock and awe.”
Actually, the situation we are facing is similar to a WWII engagement by the Germans. I am referring to the Battle of Stalingrad, which cost the Germans their entire 8th Army to Russia.
Like the Germans at Stalingrad, we have a long supply line porly defended, with our troops well inside potentially hostile territory.
I happen to think the fact our troops have not already been cut-off shows the inherent leaderless nature of the insurgency, and shows that the insurgents are intentionally fighting each other as much as, or more than, the US troops.
I so admire you Jane!
Steve, Jane, thank you so much. This post and others like it are supporting our troops.
Thanks Steve
(Jane - your name shows as author at the top of the post - which confused me for about 30 seconds)
This IS a heady subject.
It is important to consider that regardless of your attitudes about the inception of this war (I have always considered it a mistake) that the exit strategy would be best managed by those with a record of success. That would preclude our current administration which has managed to make everything they touch worse for everyone but contracting firms.
angie @ 7
I kinda thought you might around.
Thanks for your post, Steve!
Hoping for US out of Iraq NOW.
[and best wishes to Warren Karp, USMC, Korean War combat veteran.
wishing him long life and good health]
Steve is absolutely correct about equipment and vehicles. Sunnis and Shia don’t have heavy weapons, but all it takes is one round from an RPG to disable an Abrams. At Little Big Horn, the Sioux and the Cheyenne shot the 7th Cavalry’s horses first.
Minnesotachuck @ 6
That’s a pretty good summation. It’s pretty easy for the neocons to disregard the lessons of history because the analogies aren’t exact–but that denies the reality that analogy is not and was never meant to be homology.
Sorry about the confusion, I put Steve’s posts up for him and this is twice now I’ve forgotten to change the name. Well, actually I’m just trying to take credit for his always-excellent work, if only for a bit.
this is an incredibly educational post.
I am ever the optimist and find it hard to believe we will suffer a fighting retreat
everyone knows I hated the run up to the war, I hated the manner it was prosecuted, I hated those that conducted the campaign
however I am under the impression that if we have to fight to leave, the president would rather level Iraq then submit to a “fighting retreat”
he’s already laid the ground work, blaming the Iraqi’s for what he caused, he’s villainized the “islamo fascists” and he will enjoy nationwide support if his retreat is aggressive to th point of laying Iraq to waste.
in other words, I do not believe history will repeat itself here…my opinion, we will retreat and the Iraqi’s will be happy with their victory over us and allow us the embarrassing defeat
or, if they fight us on the way out they are leveled…if this happens, sad to say, the president will regain his image as some kind of military strategist
angie @
7
I’m trying to contact him for Book Salon, don’t remember who suggested it — was it you Angie? — but it would be nice.
FWIW, wiki on Chesty Puller.
This guy fought at Guadalcanal in ‘42.
If Native Americans and Palestinians were armed equally with respect to their adversaries, ‘things’ today might be very well be quite different.
Jane Hamsher @ 19
I believe it was angie.
STEVE..I read some of your posts earlier today and the Athens’-Syracuse analogy really connected.
It was a year or so ago that AC-130 gunships were sent to Iraq. At the time a few people asked WTF are they going to use them for? I think it was you who said that they will be used for a fighting retreat. With a psychopath as the commander-in chief, this country and our soldiers are really screwed.
John Casper @
15
Personally, I’d say leave the equipment and get the people as soon as physically possible. If the American Government really thinks it deserves to have its toys, it might just have to buy them back from the Iraqi government (and probably not the Iraqis that are currently ‘in charge’). But perhaps that is some small token of retribution for a modicum of the suffering that America has caused that country’s people.
The issue of the “fighting retreat” is problemmatic at best.
I have this feeling that the settlement will come in two phases… one will include a secure base somewhere near the Kuwaiti border, with runway facilities large enough to handle transport aircraft, and be isolated enough that no Iraqis can get close enough to mortar, shell or use SAMs against any aircraft inbound/outbound. Troops will be “garrisoned” there as a “backup” for the non-existant Iraqi forces, as political cover for “cut and run”/strategic retreat/whatever.
The second phase will be shutting down the base in 2008 and getting the hell out. By then, our Beloved Leader will be so into thinking about how many copies of “My Pet Goat” to send to SMU that he won’t be paying attention to Mess O’Potamia anymore.
my 2cents.
Apropos of this discussion, although those with stronger stomachs than I probably already saw this or commented about it on the Talking Heads thread this morning (apologies to David Byrne and company).
Bush adviser: “We have not failed in Iraq”
Excerpt: “We have not failed in Iraq,” Stephen Hadley said as he made the talk show rounds. “We will fail in Iraq if we pull out our troops before we’re in a position to help the Iraqis succeed.”
But he added: “The president understands that we need to have a way forward in Iraq that is more successful.”
JH….
Please keep trying to get Carter here.
And in the accompanying photo, Hadley illustrates how much U.S. troops have helped the Iraqis succeed so far.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 27
I think if clinton’s wife is really going to run, teh hamsher should be able to get both carter and the big dog here as part of her campaign
Jane Hamsher @ 19
I think all of us would do well by hearing Jimmy just speak, and there are plenty of us that want to and need to hear what he has to say!
btw– xoxo
johnSwifty at 6:37 pm
Completely agree and I don’t think Steve G. or I meant to imply otherwise. If we’re losing equipment and vehicles, however, we will also be losing lots of lives.
OT, the loss of equipment might tempt the Russians wrt former Soviet Republics. I’m not necessarily blaming Putin for this, the pressure inside Russia might just be too strong, if we are perceived as significantly weakened.
ot
crooks and liars has this up
According to the Sacramento Bee, Senator Dianne Feinstein–slated to become Chairperson of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee–will push for legislation requiring paper trails for all electronic voting as well as audits. Her statement (from her website):
“A draft report by the National Institute of Standards and Technology made public today reaffirms my belief that there are serious questions about the security and reliability of paperless electronic voting machines. It further demonstrates the importance of moving forward with new legislation to require that there be an independent paper record of every ballot.
I plan to introduce that legislation at the beginning of the new Congress and hold hearings soon after, with the intent of moving the bill to the Senate floor as soon as possible. As we’ve seen in Sarasota, Florida, where officials have been unable to account for about 18,000 undervotes in the Congressional election, it is crucial that there be an independent record that can be reviewed by election officials.
One-third of voters cast their ballots in the midterm election using new electronic voting machines, and problems arose, not only in Florida, but in various jurisdictions across the country. We must do everything we can to restore confidence in the outcomes of elections by helping to ensure that every vote cast by an American citizen is recorded accurately and that every eligible voter can, in fact, cast a ballot.”
in other words;
RUSS!!!
Agh!! I think I just overwrote a comment!!
Cannot figure out how I did that, either. My Sun Tzu comment should have followed MayDaze…it’s like a rift in the time-space continuum.
I guess, I’d ask the following questions:–
1. Would it really be a fighting retreat? Maybe it’ll be to cheering masses happy to get rid of us. It’s also not completely improbable that we could negoatite a truth with most of the insurgent factions for purposes of retreat. As long as such a truth holds with most of the factions, then we can get most of our assets out.
2. The role of tactical air cover is now significantly different than in the Korean war, and our retreating forces will, conceivably, have plenty of it. Air cover isn’t much use in securing cities (despite what Rummy thinks of it), but it is now quite effective in covering exposed columns on open roads.
3. Should we completely rule out partition? Does the north really really WANT to be part of the quagmire in central and southern Iraq, despite the nice sounds their politicians make? I certainly wouldn’t if I were them. In this case, our troops could be redeployed to secure a single line of partition.. tactically a much easier position to cover than to try to secure countless cities in the hostile south and center of the country.
4. Is it really beyond the moral quagmire that is Bush’s brain to try something insanely immoral, like splash bunker busters or even nukes on hostile cities during a retreat?
perris @ 32
Agreed! This is a wedge issue I can get behind. Looking forward to seeing how any Thug can justify not supporting it…as publicly as possible!
perris @ 29
“…as part of her campaign”?
Hadley would tell Russert that the earth was flat if Bush told him to.
Rayne @ 33
the problem is that the president has shown HE’S NEVER PREPARED, even when he’s SCHOOLED on what is likely to occur, he just doesn’t care.
if our military is prepared for every contingency when we leave, I have complete faith the retreat will be a success
however, if this president is the person that orders the retreat, I sadly suspect our armed forces will be ready for the following;
being sent off with gifts of candy and well wishes
Certainly there is risk of significant losses in any retreat. As Mao said (derived from Sun Tzu), “he retreats, we attack”. And there are always significant losses of materiel in any retreat - the main issue there is whether the enemy can make use of equipment left behind. Having acknowledged that, comparisons of the situation in Iraq to Chosin strike me as quite overblown. UN forces were heavily outnumbered and subject to withering wave attacks; I see no such threat in Iraq.
The current discussion of arming the Iraqis before we leave is much more distressing and, IMO, could result in serious losses as our “ally” turns the weapons over to the militias to use against us.
John Casper @ 31
Man, I bet you where a good Risk player. The picture you paint in consideration of a larger effect to the cause of Bush’s war is dark. But, the assumption is that America should continue its role as the world’s watchdog. I would be willing to entertain the case that the debacle in Iraq is glaring evidence for why we should not.
General Clark on a fighting withdrawal, September, 2005:
The complete transcript of the conference is here: (long but worth the read)
http://securingamerica.com/tsap/050906
Oklahoma kiddo @ 36
ya, the dog would do every venue he could find to promote her office, carter would do the same
firedog lake is surely a great place for them to offer their dialogue to help the roots get behind her as a candidate
I want out of Iraq. I want a Palestinian homeland. Anything less will not do.
I want accountability for those complicit in the deaths of American soldiers and the old, sick, women and children who have perished needlessly in Iraq.
American forces in Iraq are being shot at now and are the target of IED attack. It would be surprising if some of this did not occur during an exit, but for both military and political reasons, the chances of a “fighting retreat” as described by Steve Gilliard are close to zero.
Stop the killing. Bring the people home.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 46
Oklahoma kiddo @ 44
Oklahoma kiddo @ 43
Bless you, your passion for justice, your family, the winter wheat, and your new kitty, Ok kiddo.
I want what you said.
and a pony
for each of us. :)
Oklahoma kiddo @ 46
ditto.
Do we know how many people will have to be evacuated? 141k US military, how many US civilians, third world KBR workers, armed mercs and Green-Zone Iraqis, etc. Total 500k? As Steve shows on the maps, there isn’t a clean and quick way to evac. 1/2 million people.
Damn. I can’t figure out how it happened. I overwrote the same comment not once but twice.
Each time I’d refreshed the comments, started what looked like a new comment, only to overwrite an earlier comment.
I’ve closed the window, re-opened it, and will hope for the best this time.
To restate the first comment overwritten, I said that the ISG was really a tool to help the public get its mind wrapped around that which Gilliard discusses, and NOT a tool to create the exit strategy. The exit strategies are really already prepared, probably at Baker’s behest, but not for public consumption. The recent diplomatic efforts are designed less to support the exit strategies than they are to get the public on board.
My second comment overwritten was in response to MayDaze’s comment, had already been thinking of this from the Art of War:
We absolutely must discuss “fighting our way out” so that both we and our troops are mentally prepared to give this our best. Failing to discuss it is gross negligence.
OT - Chavez wins re-election by wide margin
If the Turks allow us to retreat north, that’s huge. Steve seems to think they will and he knows more about it than I do. Having just set up a Kurdish homeland, I’m not clear why they would be anxious to accomodate us.
On our way out, we can “negotiate” with anyone we want, but it won’t matter. EVERYONE will be trying to score points by videotaping their militias attack on our convoys. I don’t think we know who to “negotiate” with. Also, just because someone accepts a bribe for not shooting at us as we pass through their town, how do we know that they can control everyone in that town? Sadr can’t control his militias in Baghdad.
I agree that tactical air cover, A10 Warthog will play a huge role, but in urban areas they will do unbelieveable damage to civilians. That in turn will galvanize support against us fighting our way South to Basra. It will take weeks to move 140,000 US troops and their equipment to Basra. That gives everyone in Iraq time to really load up against us and possibly fight us in Basra.
If we have to use close air support to cover our retreat, this could all unravel. It would be all over al-Jazeera anyway, and you might not be able to stop combat units from all over the ME from joining in.
That’s a huge question. I completely agree with you, it would make our tactical position much easier. From what I understand, however, there has been a great deal of intermarriage between the Sunni and the Shia. Lots of Sunnis living south of Baghdad, lots of Shia living north. I’ll defer to others who know the situation better.
Once US troops are under attack, he is under enormous pressure to do whatever it takes to get them out. I doubt bunker busters will be an option, but your previous mention of air cover is very appropiate here, imho.
kirk murphy @ 47
The people and the kitty, say to you murph, Merry Christmas!
Steve @ 49
Excellent point.
BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) — Nine U.S. troops died in Iraq during the weekend, including five killed by roadside bombs, the U.S. military reported Sunday.
The butcher’s bill for the weekend and god knows how many Iraqis.
John Casper 52 — doesn’t it strike you as odd that there have been no big splashy diplomatic meetings with Turkey like that with Syria, Jordan, Saudi Arabia this past week?
Steve @ 55
I won’t be awfully surprised if our tab at the butcher’s shop runs up to three thousand by year’s end. Maybe even by Christmas.
Hugh at 6:55 pm. There’s a first time for everything, I’m disagreeing with a comment you made.
Retreating itself is a humilitating manuver. It absolutely invites attacks. One IED can hold up an entire column. Now you’ve gotta column of pissed off GI’s within a hundred yards of Sunnis or Shia that don’t like them. Sooner or later, somebody throws a rock. Then we send out a “patrol.” Then somebody shoots somebody in the patrol and throws a couple of RPG’s into the column. Then we’re calling for A10’s.
The RPG really changes the landscape. It allows one poorly trained person, the chance to stop or slow down a column with one round.
I really hope I’m wrong.
OT, the Sioux and the Cheyenne at the Little Big Horn didn’t have to annihilate all of Custer’s men. They also didn’t have to allow Benteen and Reno’s men to escape. Benteen and Reno escaped, because they were better soldiers. Gaul, Crazy Horse, and Lame Man outfought Custer. Once you put armed units into any situation, it takes on a life of its own.
Rayne @ 50
I expect that our Generals have been revising their plans for retreat for some time. I therefore don’t see our troops in danger of being surrounded and cut off. The only issue is if “dear leader” foolishly provides our supposed ally the munitions to mount a real attack against our troops, forcing a catastrophic bugout.
Rayne @ 56
Great point!
My take is that this is the current battleground between “Jimmy” Baker and Junior. Baker wants those talks and Junior is having a tempertantrum over “negotiating” with terrorists.
I picked this up from Dennis Ross, a Clinton ME expert on the News Hour, a terrific distinction between “fixers” and “spoilers.”
I think Ross and Baker here are on exactly the same page. We have to talk to these people to keep them from being “spoilers.”
Merry Christmas, Ok Kiddo!
just brought home the tree today.
winter is almost here - last week or two of organic ‘chokes, corn and local raspberries and heirloom tomatoes.
[on the bright side, organic asparagus and blueberries from Lompoc whisper of warmer sun and air to come…]
Merry Christmas, Joyous Holidays, full tables, and warm homes to all at the Lake and in the wide world Outside.
Rayne @ 50
My copy is a translation by Thomas Cleary. Master Sun says in the 11th chapter, “Nine Grounds:”
While the American forces still have organizational and significantly superior transportation systems (moving from hard to soft ground far more quickly); I would prefer that they focus their bravery towards a supremely efficient and immediate withdrawal.
I know you are right that any sort of retreat will incur casualties at this point. We have been reduced to accepting that military fact, but utilizing the superior capabilities of our military and organized systems will allow us to move the ground the conflict is waged upon.
well maybe the Iraqi’s who’ve been forced to leave - often in the middle of the night - can advise the generals on how to get out:
web.int/rw/RWB.NSF/db900SID/LSGZ-6W2F7S?OpenDocument” target=”_blank”>http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/RW.....enDocument inlcudes links to pdf of full report released 11/30/07
Note - number of new internally displaced persons in October - 425,000
(Thanks to GorillasGuides for the link and info)
Situation Reports: Iraq, UNHCR update on the Iraq situation, Contributions: Iraq, UNHCR update on the Iraq situation:
UNHCR update on the Iraq situation
Current Situation
Iraq is haemorrhaging. The humanitarian crisis which the international community had feared in 2003 is now unfolding. The massive displacement has emerged quietly and without fanfare but the numbers affected are in excess of what many agencies had predicted in 2003.
Since the February 2006 Samarra bombings UNHCR, as Cluster Coordinator for displaced groups inside Iraq (1), estimates some 425,000 Iraqis to have been recently displaced (2). In addition, some two to three thousand Iraqis are leaving per day (3) via neighbouring countries as the extent of the tragedy becomes obvious.
UNHCR estimates that there are at least 1.6 million Iraqis internally displaced with at least another 1.6 ? 1.8 million(4) in neighbouring states. The figures in the immediate neighbouring countries are still imprecise but UNHCR estimates that there are some 700,000 Iraqis in Jordan, 500,000 ? 600,000 in Syria, 100,000 in Egypt, 20,000 to 40,000 in Lebanon, 54,000 in Iran and tens of thousands more within the region and further a field. Beyond the mass exodus, which has already occurred, population movements show no sign of abating. The needs of IDPs, returnees, refugees and their host communities are dramatic and to a large extent unmet.
John Casper 60 — which brings us back to Turkey. What will Turkey be, fixer or spoiler? I suspect that if we leave without setting in motion that which will prevent an independent Kurdistan, they will well be spoilers. They’ve been on the fence about their role as fixer-spoiler since 2002.
Could be that Brewster-Jennings knew which way the wind blew on this matter; too bad some spoiled brats decided they’d cut off their noses to spite their faces.
John Casper @ 58
John - I see the A-10s and other air cover being called in at the first sign of a problem - for that matter, close air support during the retreat regardless. I would imagine there will be no mercy shown if our troops are attacked as they leave.
Rayne @ 64
I completely agree with you, but Steve Gilliard and others keep saying we can retreat through Turkey. I sure hope they are right, I just don’t know enough to really defend my position. It’s probably a good question to ask Ambassador Wilson tomorrow.
My father, a Marine Staff Sgt., was there (Chosin). He never talked about the war, so I have no details.
Let’s not do this again.
I wonder if the Iraqis would attack in the event of US withdrawal- or just spread out the red carpet and send em on the way?
I seem to remember before the start of the war that there was a lot of expectation that US troops could be sent in via Turkey … only to be blocked at the last minute. This makes me wonder a lot about the options there for retreat.
Markinsanfran @ 67
Absolutely agree with you.
I’ve been meaning to link to all of Steve’s fighting retret posts. They really lay out the grim choices facing our troops.
I wish the Kewl Kidz would read them.
I just posted a similar comment over at KOS- My freind who is a Non-Comm in Maintanence at March AFB says just destroy the heavy equipment in place because it’s all been at war for way too long to refurb to fighting form. He says it’s better to replace that equipment. He is an Assembly of God member of the religious right, but he knows about maintaining war equipment. If we don’t need to move any heavy equipment, we could airlift every last american within a month.
rwcole @ 68
That was my thought when I first saw this post, too. You would think they might greet our leaving with flowers.
johnSwifty 62 — Nuts, now you are going to make me dig in the boxes in the basement again to come up with my two different translations of The Art of War. Should have brought them up when I was digging for cookie recipes for yesterday’s Pull Up A Chair.
I believe that if we continue to encourage our troops to think that we must win, in spite of every fact on the ground telling them this is not a winnable situation, they will not be as likely to put their full psychic energy into it. However, if we lay out all the facts, show them how serious this is and what the stakes are, while telling them they are now able to work towards the exit, I believe they will put not only their physical but psychic powers into this. (I refer to psychic not meaning sixth sense but the spiritual energy that must be mustered in order to achieve any objective.) It’s not about retreat as much as it is about the desperate nature of the sitution at hand; depending on the translation, Sun Tzu may have said as much.
Killer @ 72
And the 100s of thousands of Iraqis who will need to leave or be killed. Can we airlift them, too? Why wouldn’t we be able to?
Siun 69 — EXACTLY. My stepson was delayed entering Iraq when deployed because of the situation in Turkey.
I also wonder how the PKK has affected Turkey’s disposition towards us, since there has been substantial activity by the PKK during the U.S. military activity in Iraq.
Rayne @ 74
Oh, I’m sure he has something to say. I guess he’s lasted for 3000 years for a reason. I understand you now…you want to be truthful! That’s weird, I heard Jimmy Carter, earlier today, talking crazy talk like that.
johnSwifty @ 75
I wasn’t thinking about anything but the solution to the military dilemma of avoiding the Chosin situation, whatever solutions are available to the Iraqi people.
All I can comprehend and understand is this. I want the killing to stop. We have to start some place. Sometime.
Killer @ 72
Is 155mm howitzer “heavy equipment?” What about a Bradley Fighting Vehicle at $3.5 million per vehicle?
Now you’re talking about Dunkirk. That may end up happening, but it would be staggeringly expensive. Soldiers don’t much like to fight without their weapons.
Jo Fish at 6:38 pm
Well thought out, thanks.
Killer @ 78
No worries, I was ruminating earlier and John Casper broadened my scope of perception by drawing attention to the impact that will be felt in countries recently broken from the USSR.
There’s many things at play here; but I share your immediate focus to just get the hell out, and quick.
Bring the people home.
John Casper @ 80
What is the war costing in Billions per week? How much would be saved by leaving now rather than in 6 months? Seriously, someone do the math for me please, I suck at figures.
You could take those funds and buy off the military industrial complex to make some more, that’s all they really want anyway. What’s some more debt to China? We just get the kids home.
I keep getting chilling images of the retreat of the Iraqis from Kuwait … under fire by “allied” troops … the loss of life was horrifying … read Fisk’s accounts in Great War but be prepared for nightmares. I somehow doubt the Iraqis, whose lives have been destroyed in the lastest war, have forgotten that time …
Forget the equipment.. hopefully they will have time to destroy it.
Good God, I am going to be sick just thinking about the cost.
The cost of lives, the cost of the resources that must be expended or destroyed.
Terrified at the prospects. Oh, to be a stupid American teenager in 1975 again, understanding but unknowing…