Welcome back to the wonderfully dreadful world of waste and fraud.
Kicking off this whirlwind tour of war profiteers this week is the expansion of the Blackwater USA empire to Illinois. In addition to the 7,000-acre training facility in North Carolina, Blackwater is expanding with an 80-acre facility in Mount Carroll, Ill. Coming soon: A facility in southern California and a 25-acre camp in the Philippines. [Associated Press, 11/27]
The following day, a judge ruled that the wrongful death suit against the security company may go forward, ending nearly two years of litigation.
Superior Court Judge Donald Stephens' decision means the families of the murdered contractors can start pressing Blackwater Security Services for documents and testimony about what led to the massacre shown on televisions and in newspapers around the world.
The suit was filed by the families of the four slain Americans in Fallujah in March 2004. The bodies were burned and the charred bodies dragged through the streets, torn limb from limb, and strung up on what is now referred to as "Blackwater Bridge."
America's favorite romance novelist, Kenneth Starr, was hired by Blackwater in an effort to get the Supreme Court to hear the case.
In the Los Angeles Times, the nominee to replace old man Rumsfeld as Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates, is reported to have ties to — who else — defense contractors.
Gates' ties include:
SAIC — briefly served on the board soon after leaving government in 1993; SAIC was under investigation by the Justice Department for, what else, "contract irregularities." (Go figure.) SAIC later settled for $2.5 million. Just four days ago, SAIC announced the signing a missile defense contract with NATO worth an estimated $95 million.
VoteHere — served on the advisory board; an electronic voting machine firm linked to SAIC, according to the LAT
TRW — served on the board; now part of Northrup Grumann
He also found himself on the board of Parker Drilling Company, and earned $52,000 last year and owns 12,000 shares worth over $100K.
Here's the part that you guys are going to love — because I know I did. Parker Drilling Co. refers to Halliburton as a "significant customer" leasing equipment, the L.A. Times reports. (And we all know how Halliburton is happy-go-lucky with the leased equipment…)
… often leasing equipment for international projects. Parker has partnered with Halliburton in a major drilling project in southern Mexico and in smaller efforts, such as a rig worker training program in Russia.
Gates also sits on the boards for Chili's and Macaroni Grill. Glad it wasn't Applebees. I love me some Applebees.
And on the final stop, Halliburton's delinquent son, KBR (takes after its parent company), settled a contract dispute with the U.S. Army from the last war (Kosovo). The settlement of $8 million, however, was relatively small in comparison to the $1 billion+ in overcharges during the Iraq War. And in just six years. Alright…
At that pace, American taxpayers should recoup from this war in the year 2756. Or, to put it in more favorable terms: 1,500 Friedman units.
And now back to dreaming about ponies.
Addendum: Caught this a couple hours before the post heads to the presses (via tubes). In The Guardian, Stuart Bowen Jr., the Republican lawyer set to be fired as Pentagon Inspector General Special Inspector General at the Pentagon in October '07, says corruption in Iraq "is the second insurgency, and I use that metaphor to underline the seriousness of this issue."
… "The deputy prime minister, Barham Saleh, told Sigir this summer that it threatens the state. That speaks for itself."
An example of how incompetence hinders the ability of U.S. forces to quell the 'first' insurgency.
Corruption is a "virtual pandemic" costing the country $4 billion a year. One example from the article below:
In the Hillah region a defence department contract employee and two lieutenant colonels were found to have steered $8m in contracts to a US contractor in return for bribes. The Pentagon contract employee, Robert Stein, pleaded guilty earlier this year, admitting he and his co-conspirators received more than $1m in cash, help with laundering the funds, jewellery, cars and sex with prostitutes. Stein also admitted that they simply stole $2m from the construction fund, accounting for the money with receipts from fictitious construction companies.
KBR racked up $53 million in overhead costs (administrative expenses) between the day of the contract signing in February 2004 and actually starting work on November 19. From 2004-2006, overhead totaled more than half of KBR's $300 million in costs, according to a SIGIR review. Ah yes, smell that conservatism?
A potentially far more serious problem has been the way the US government decided to give out reconstruction contracts. It split the economy into sectors and shared them out among nine big US corporations. In most cases the contracts were distributed without competition and on a cost-plus basis. In other words the contractors were guaranteed a profit margin calculated as a percentage of their costs, so the higher the costs, the higher the profits. In the rush to get work started the contracts were signed early in 2004. In many cases work did not get under way until the year was nearly over. In the months between, the contractors racked up huge bills on wages, hotel bills and restaurants.
According to a Sigir review published in October, Kellogg, Brown and Root (a subsidiary of Halliburton, Vice President Dick Cheney's former company) was awarded an oil industry repair contract in February 2004 but "direct project activity" did not begin until November 19. In that time KBR's overhead costs were nearly $53m. In fact more than half the company's $300m project costs from 2004-06 went on overheads, the audit found.
So much for that "we've got to just throw a sh!tload of money at them so we can get to work for the Iraqi people" nonsense back in 2003.
And here's what the legislation signed by President Bush, which effectively disbands SIGIR next year, will deprive the American and Iraqi people. (The provision that dissolves SIGIR was reportedly sneaked into a defense appropriations authorization bill.]
Mr Bowen's inspectors are among the few US civilian officials who still venture beyond the fortified bounds of the Green Zone in Baghdad into the rest of Iraq, to see how $18bn of American taxpayers' money is being spent. Much of the money has been wasted. Sigir officials have referred 25 cases of fraud to the justice department for criminal investigation, four of which have led to convictions, and about 90 more are under investigation.
Hopefully more will follow, ey Waxman? Eh? Eh?
The whole article is worth the read. I strongly recommend it.
[Matt writes at SOTUblog.]
Related posts:





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Waxman!
Apologies for the completely lame title. I finished late last night and drew a blank since a number of stories are covered here.
So around 2-3am or so, I just said, “screw it” and decided to go with a topical term here at FDL: Polonium-210.
Fitz!!
I rather suspect that Bowen will get to know Waxman really well. They have much to talk about. It sounds as if Bowen is a hoest fellow for a Republican in this day and age. That is unusual in itself.
OT: Matt, if you have not already gotten it, you should be getting a package from me any day now. It needs a wireless card but otherwise should be good to go.
Corruption, cronyism and fraud. Thanks for helping us stay on topic, Matt.
Pachacutec @ 5
Thanks, Pach. My roommate is on package-watch while I am still here in CA. I head back to Tucson on Tuesday.
Thanks again!
Thanks, Matt. We can only hope Waxman will have his way with these fellows. He can be slightingly intimidating, too.
And if he does, you will most certainly be providing the much-needed Cliff notes.
Matt O – thanks for your work!
Matt Ortega – thanks for your work!
Good to meet you both ;)
kirk murphy @ 9
Yeah, I figured since most of the people who link to me mention me by full name anyhow, might as well go with it.
AZ Matt @
4
From the press articles that I have read, he seems like a stand-up guy. It was his outfit, SIGIR, that uncovered the massive $9 billion credibility gap on the accounting process in Iraq.
I may have missed it, but does anybody know if he has been reinstated? Or if there’s legislation from Democrats on the way to do so?
I had about a 2-week period up to Thanksgiving where I was on the road or totally incommunicado with the world at my parents’ new home in East Texas. (No internet/TV yet.)
Ouch. That must effect your personal terror score, which we now know Homeland Sec devises for each of us. Do you usually go for window or aisle seats?
Matt Ortega @
11
Blub @ 12
Ha!
I fly Southwest, which is open seating. (Though, I hear they are trying out assigned seats on some flights.)
And it has been quite sometime since I left the country. (Pre-9/11)
Dec. 2, 2006 — Although she is not yet ready to explain herself, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is admitting that the United States has made mistakes in Iraq.
“As to whether the United States has made mistakes: Of course, I’m sure we have,” Rice told the Arabic satellite television station Al-Arabiya. “You can’t be involved in something as big as the liberation of a country like Iraq and all that has happened since, and I’m sure there are things that we could have done differently.”
However, Rice told Al-Arabiya that now is not the time to talk about U.S. mistakes in Iraq.
Rice is such a fascinating woman. Speaking about war profiteering, does Condi still receive some sort of compensation from her former employer, Chevron, as does Cheney from Halliburton?
great post Matt! and let’s go Waxman!
sitting in the Montreal airport, all shops and restos closed, can’t leave intl departures except to fly … and plane is delayed (multiple times) and only 2 passengers on the flight so who knows when they’ll decide we’ll get home!
The terrorist score thing is interesting – I am always the “random” search in Toronto where they are quite nasty but Montreal was easy and pleasant … so do I get a higher score for each FDL segment flown?
Siun @ 15
Thanks Siun.
I’ve only been pulled to the side once and it was because I was going back to school and had scissors in my backpack. It just never occurred to me while I was packing the night before while watching the ‘04 DNC Convention.
Matt – Sibel Edmonds has a great two-parter (one, two) on Defence Contractors & Lobbying etc.
so Matt … do you think there’s a chance to defeat Gates based on his business connections?
(our plane arrived – wonder if they’ll board the two of us by rows!)
Siun @ 15
Siun, You are probably on the “watch list” just for posting here. I’m being facetious (I hope) but given everything else we’ve seen in the last few years, it wouldn’t surprise me at all.
Siun @
18
Defeat him? Don’t know about that, but there certainly are quesions about this that need to be asked at his nomination hearing.
Gates has stated that he would resign from the board of Fidelity Investments, but there are questions about his stock options.
More background on the state court civil suit against Blackwater:
US Judge sends Blackwater suit back to NC state court
Unless his confirmation is stalled until the new Congress convenes, Gates will probably slide right in. Frankly, I think there are a lot of people that are relieved that Rummy is gone, and they aren’t going to make lots of noise about Gates, for that reason alone.
What needs to happen next, I think, is that Leahy puts Abu Gonzales in front of Judiciary Committee, under oath (for a change) and starts asking him pointed questions about whether or not he intends to put sufficient investigators onto government corruption cases in Iraq and in defense procurement.
Even in the Raygun-Poppy administrations, there were almost a thousand prosecutors and investigators assigned to defense wrongdoing, starting in about 1986 and the cases extended into 1994.
What happened then was enormous, but it’s a drop in the bucket compared to what has gone on and is still going on now.
a small quibble. This doesn’t ‘end’ nearly two years of litigation–it merely ends the preliminary litigation and permits the litigation in chief to go forward.
The bottom line question is that regardless of who quits, gets fired, who replaces who or who’s doing what; do we leave Iraq?
montag –
That’s staggering. I had no idea it was that extensive back then.
Similar themes from digby:
I sincerely hope that the Democrats in the House and Senate, no matter how much pressure they get to do otherwise from the “centrist” Mandarins and callow Kewl Kidz, go hard after the Bush administration on war profiteering, cronyism, corruption and waste. This is a rare opportunity for the Democrats to properly expose the Republicans for the crooks they are — and dispell the myth once and for all that they are the wise stewards of the taxpayers money.
With Rumsfeld’s ignominious and overdue downfall, and the new willingness, however tepid, among the press to look at the malfeasance in the pentagon, this may be the best opportunity they will have in decades to show just what a mistake it is to write blank chacks for military spending.
scarecrow @ 25
Yup. Google “Operation Ill Wind.” One of the chief prosecutors then was one Paul McNulty, who is now prosecuting the Larry Franklin and AIPAC cases….
Hmm, wonder what tripped the spam filter on the last reply to scarecrow @ 25?
McNulty
Franklin
A*P*C ?
Or “Operation Ill Wind” ?
Umm, think I have my answer….
Matt Ortega @ 2
don’t give yourself so much credit
the title isn’t “Completly Lame”
you’re gonna have to try harder to reach that standard
(wink)
moe99 @
23
Ah…those dang lawyers and their quibbles. Good clarification, Moe.
I saw those goons in New Orleans. I didn’t like the attitude from some of them. They’re dirty, war-profiteering, mercenaries. Fuck Blackwater.
Pelosi for President 2007
Balzac @ 32
some funny pix there
There is a stunning op-ed by Frank Rich on line now, to be printed in tomorrow’s NYT. It is behind the wall. Some exerpts (it’s really too good to chop up, but . . .):
punaise @ 33
Yes. But the joke is on us.
scarecrow @ 35
sure, but you can’t tell me you didn’t get a chuckle from seeing W in an orange jumpsuit by George Zimmer.
condensed Frank Rich theme – see this SF Chronicle headline chez Swopa:
“Best Not to Take Bush Too Literally”
punaise @ 36
I like the Vanna pic.
New thread upstairs
Matt Ortega @
2
Matt O.!
Thanks for keeping at Gates. California constituents who want Senator Feinstein to ask Gates tough questions (she seems inclined to) can contact her here. Her frontyard presser on 11/8 sounded like she remembers Iran/Contra.
=======
Who’s Next?
=======
PS Great title; not a Walcott reference, but I bet TRex will be pleased to see you on the Polonium-210 skate.
Matt Ortega @
10
I figured since Daniel was back, you’d use your own name.
Compassionate cronyism.
scarecrow @
38
Love this link and just did some Xmas stocking stuffer shopping my grown youngsters will love including Pelosi for President 2007 buttons, bumperstickers & tees.
GREAT work again matt! keep at it, this is critically important stuff
Oh jeeze Matt – THANK YOU for your excellent post! Thanks too for ushering me into the Christmas spirit! ;~)
robert greenwald @ 44
Hello, Mr. Greenwald, thanks for your work as well, and for carrying the banner so well in your conversations with Keith Olbermann on Countdown. Your appearances there give me hope.
Matt O.: does anybody know if he has been reinstated? Or if there’s legislation from Democrats on the way to do so?
Yes, I saw Feingold, Olympia Snowe, and Lieberman on C-SPAN a couple of weeks ago promoting their certain-to-pass reinstatement of the Pentagon IG. Snowe was looking happy as a clam, gently needling Lieberman (who’d just the day before made his first threat to bolt at some point) by calling it “the first tri-partisan amendment of the new congress.”
Thanks very much for this roundup, Matt.
other connections to recognize?
SAIC
The Washington Note
…after more than six years, Trailblazer is not up and running. NSA failed to deliver the system. Today, NSA lacks a system to comprehensively evaluate all the communications collected by its vast networks. According to the article, the NSA Inspector General reported in 2003, €œinadequate management and oversight€ of private contractors and overpayment for the work that was done;
3. cancelled a separate and less-expensive program, Thinthread which a Pentagon report in 2004 found to be more promising than Trailblazer and could be put to use faster;
4. hired William Black Jr. from SAIC in 2000 to be the Deputy Director of NSA. San Diego based SAIC, won the contract for Trailblazer according to a second Baltimore Sun Article
http://www.baltimoresun.com/ne…..1259.story
and by 2002, Black was overseeing Trailblazer. According to the article, €œTwo other top NSA managers who worked on Trailblazer – Hal Smith and Sam Visner – also left the spy agency for jobs at SAIC. There, Smith worked on Trailblazer and the FBI’s Virtual Case File program,€€ .
___________________________
Little-known contractor has close ties with staff of NSA
As SAIC has grown, it has forged close ties to several key defense and intelligence agencies, including the NSA. Among those who have served on SAIC’s board of directors are former NSA Director Bobby Ray Inman; former CIA Directors John M. Deutch and Robert M. Gates; and former Defense Secretaries Melvin R. Laird and William J. Perry.
The door swings so regularly between the NSA and SAIC that the company has earned the nickname “NSA West” inside the intelligence community.
____________________________
Chapter Eight
..This attractive but simplistic vision of the technology overlooks an important fact: those individuals and organizations in power do not particularly want to lose their power, and will go to great efforts to adapt any new technology to their own needs. They will also, quite naturally, attempt to undermine any technology they consider to be a threat to their own interests.
For example, the question of who controls the US domain name space is of great concern to online activists. Despite the common assumption that the Internet is highly decentralized in structure, all top-level domain names {24} in the United States are currently controlled by a single organization – the InterNIC. Formerly administered by the National Science Foundation, (NSF) an independent US government agency, the InterNIC is now run by two private corporations under contract to the NSF. One of these companies is AT&T, the telecom giant, and the other is a company called Network Solutions, Inc. (NSI). In mid 1995 NSI was acquired by Scientific Applications International Corp. (SAIC), a US $2 billion firm that specializes in military, police and government intelligence contracts. And, as Stephen Pizzo points out…
…This highly esoteric technical issue serves to undermine the notion that the Internet is inherently democratic and decentralized, because control over name and IP number space translates directly to control over access to the system as a whole. Anyone can pay a commercial provider for network access in order to plug a computer into the Internet, but unless that computer’s address is recognized by the central name authorities for their namespace then nobody will be able to find it. As Gordon Cook notes: “It is beginning to appear that, the more the Internet increases in size, the faster that power flows upwards into the hands of a few who, since they are both operators and rule makers for the commercial Internet, would find themselves singled out for accusations of blatant conflict of interest in most other situations.” (Cook, 1996.) Some companies have tried to set up alternative name registries to the InterNIC and national name registrar monopolies, but whether such ventures will succeed remains to be seen….
The last reference was from ten years ago and their control is tightening still. NSA has the patents for many different net technologies including “geo-locating” from simple web searches and pafe access. Control of the DNS system/servers/routers can enable control and monitoring of virtually all traffic and communication. I don’t trust ‘em at all.