Comments on: BREAKING: O.J. – Regan Events CANCELED

By: bob h

bob h — Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:39:04 +0000

Isn’t Regan Bernie Kerik’s inamorata? There isn’t even a thin veneer on American society; it is pure trash top to bottom.

By: Joeff53

Joeff53 — Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:52:24 +0000

I guess maybe Fox figured they had a monopoly on the Simpson franchise.

By: montag

montag — Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:38:48 +0000

deviantdevil @
136

montag @ 133

That is, of course, all a matter of your (no-so-humble) opinion. You have spoken the prevailing rhetoric well. Now, can you argue the point as to why what you said may be incorrect?

Pardon? Let’s back up. You said I was incorrect because I expressed something that did not conform with your opinion.

I offered facts. You expressed opinion.

In the reality-based world, facts do trump unsupported, unreasoned opinion.

Cheers.

By: g

Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:51:55 +0000

Ooops, is my face red. I meant to say

“Why I did it.”

To make money.

Bitch.

By: g

Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:51:19 +0000

WHY I DID IT
JUDITH REGAN EXPLAINS PUBLISHING O.J.’S NEW BOOK

Yeah. “why I did it.”

bitch.

By: Neptunus Lex » A kind of justice

Neptunus Lex » A kind of justice — Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:44:13 +0000

[…] Murdoch finally over-estimated the degradation of the entertainment market and had to walk the cat back to the house. After all, this story was essentially the kind of cheat-the-law, soaked-in-blood pornography that has very few natural allies – when Taylor Marsh and Michelle Malkin agree on something, you know it had to be a bad idea – and it would have been a hard sell at neighborhood book stores: Not only is Simpson functionally illiterate (according to Hitch, who’s in fine form) but it’s not the type of thing that even the most jaded coastal sophisticates would have lying around on their coffee tables. […]

By: Paging Jackie Chiles… at Blog P.I.

Paging Jackie Chiles… at Blog P.I. — Tue, 21 Nov 2006 01:44:25 +0000

[…] This afternoon News Corp. announced it would not be publishing the O.J. Simpson book, “If I did it,” and it naturally follows, Fox would not be airing the accompanying Judith Regan interview. If there’s anyone in the blogosphere who’s upset with this turn of events, you won’t find them on Memeorandum. When Firedoglake and Michelle Malkin agree on something, pause to savor the moment. […]

By: deviantdevil

deviantdevil — Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:23:19 +0000

montag @ 133

That is, of course, all a matter of your (no-so-humble) opinion. You have spoken the prevailing rhetoric well. Now, can you argue the point as to why what you said may be incorrect?

By: Dan Whitworth

Dan Whitworth — Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:08:35 +0000

Taylor @ 82: thanks for the tip. That’s about how long I spent in the smut biz, too.

I was a projectionist, just so’s nobody thinks I’m bragging or something.

By: MayDaze

MayDaze — Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:02:18 +0000

egregious @ 130

rwcole @ 124

Two fifteen minute coffee breaks (plus lunch) is pretty standard.

Ya but without lunch => illegal.

This issue is state law - varies from state to state. Some states have virtually no legal protections at all for workers.