<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chris Dodd Puts Constitutional Rights on the American Agenda</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/16/chris-dodd-puts-constitutional-rights-on-the-american-agenda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/16/chris-dodd-puts-constitutional-rights-on-the-american-agenda/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:29:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Daily Background</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/16/chris-dodd-puts-constitutional-rights-on-the-american-agenda/#comment-386003</link>
		<dc:creator>The Daily Background</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/16/chris-dodd-puts-constitutional-rights-on-the-american-agenda/#comment-386003</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[…] Outlawing torture and restoring constitutional rights:  Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT), an outspoken opponent of the Military Commission Act of 2006, today introduced legislation which would amend existing law in order to have an effective process for bringing terrorists to justice. […] It’s clear the people who perpetrated these horrendous crimes against our country and our people have no moral compass and deserve to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. But in taking away their legal rights, the rights first codified in our country’s Constitution, we’re taking away our own moral compass, as well.” […]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Outlawing torture and restoring constitutional rights:  Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT), an outspoken opponent of the Military Commission Act of 2006, today introduced legislation which would amend existing law in order to have an effective process for bringing terrorists to justice. […] It’s clear the people who perpetrated these horrendous crimes against our country and our people have no moral compass and deserve to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. But in taking away their legal rights, the rights first codified in our country’s Constitution, we’re taking away our own moral compass, as well.” […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deandra</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/16/chris-dodd-puts-constitutional-rights-on-the-american-agenda/#comment-385867</link>
		<dc:creator>deandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 11:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/16/chris-dodd-puts-constitutional-rights-on-the-american-agenda/#comment-385867</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dodd is also testing the waters for a presidential run!  With Dodd, a wonderful senator, possibly running for president, who’s minding the store?  Lieberman?  Rell?  Yeah right.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dodd is also testing the waters for a presidential run!  With Dodd, a wonderful senator, possibly running for president, who’s minding the store?  Lieberman?  Rell?  Yeah right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purvis ames</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/16/chris-dodd-puts-constitutional-rights-on-the-american-agenda/#comment-385864</link>
		<dc:creator>purvis ames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 10:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/16/chris-dodd-puts-constitutional-rights-on-the-american-agenda/#comment-385864</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The Democrats don’t take power until January. They’re going to float a few trial balloons until they take control and then come down with a hammer that Caligula Jr. in the White House won’t believe. He’ll be lucky to stay out of jail.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Democrats don’t take power until January. They’re going to float a few trial balloons until they take control and then come down with a hammer that Caligula Jr. in the White House won’t believe. He’ll be lucky to stay out of jail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pow wow</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/16/chris-dodd-puts-constitutional-rights-on-the-american-agenda/#comment-385818</link>
		<dc:creator>pow wow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 06:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/16/chris-dodd-puts-constitutional-rights-on-the-american-agenda/#comment-385818</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for highlighting this so quickly, Swopa. [And thank you VERY much Chris Dodd.]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don’t want to go off-topic again on TRex, especially when they’re having a pretty intense discussion over there on an important subject, but I really want to try to get the word out about a new filing from Fitzgerald late 11/16 in the Libby case, that reveals what’s at stake at the moment.  So I hope this late EPU in your thread, though off-topic, may be of some interest to you, if you wander back here [I also just posted this at the end of today’s Libby thread by Christy].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is what the CIPA process (and thus the fate of the Libby case) has come down to (emphasis added), in the words of Special Counsel Fitzgerald:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;An even more alarming assertion in defendant’s CIPA Memorandum - one that completely controverts the purpose of CIPA and &lt;b&gt;reveals defendant’s true graymail motivation&lt;/b&gt; - is the assertion that Congress’ contemplation of an acceptable statement admitting relevant facts would only be satisfied in this case if the government admitted that &lt;i&gt;“the national security matters were vastly more important to Mr. Libby than the snippets of conversation concerning Valerie Wilson and thus caused him to confuse or misremember those snippets when asked about them months later.”&lt;/i&gt; … The drafters of CIPA contemplated that the “statement admitting relevant facts” would be a statement admitting relevant “facts,” not a statement of conclusions the defense wants the jury to draw.  The government has offered a statement admitting relevant facts that serves the purposes contemplated by CIPA, in addition to  proposing &lt;b&gt;detailed substitutions for all of the relevant classified exhibits&lt;/b&gt;…&lt;br /&gt;
…&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, during the Section 6(a) hearings, even defendant admitted that balancing of the government’s right to hold people accountable  for criminal activity and not subvert the process through graymail is proper at the Section 6(c) stage: [by Mr. Cline:] &lt;i&gt;“And I think when we get to the substitution phase, that is where Congress sought to find a way of balancing these needs.”&lt;/i&gt; … &lt;b&gt;Now that the Court is at the Section 6(c) stage, defendant conveniently seeks to avoid such balancing.&lt;/b&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Special Counsel Fitzgerald 11/16/06, including key quotes from a sealed 11/14 defense filing&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There seems to be a continuance for at least one more CIPA Section 6(c) hearing, perhaps until after the Judge returns from vacation next week, but the graymail threat is coming down to the wire.  The Judge will be ruling, and when he does, he will either make or break the graymail threat of dismissal of this case (prior to any government appeal).  From the sound of this new government filing, Libby is now pulling out all the stops to get the case dismissed by way of a classified information graymail ruling…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for highlighting this so quickly, Swopa. [And thank you VERY much Chris Dodd.]</p>
<p>I don’t want to go off-topic again on TRex, especially when they’re having a pretty intense discussion over there on an important subject, but I really want to try to get the word out about a new filing from Fitzgerald late 11/16 in the Libby case, that reveals what’s at stake at the moment.  So I hope this late EPU in your thread, though off-topic, may be of some interest to you, if you wander back here [I also just posted this at the end of today’s Libby thread by Christy].</p>
<p>This is what the CIPA process (and thus the fate of the Libby case) has come down to (emphasis added), in the words of Special Counsel Fitzgerald:</p>
<blockquote><p>An even more alarming assertion in defendant’s CIPA Memorandum &#8211; one that completely controverts the purpose of CIPA and <b>reveals defendant’s true graymail motivation</b> &#8211; is the assertion that Congress’ contemplation of an acceptable statement admitting relevant facts would only be satisfied in this case if the government admitted that <i>“the national security matters were vastly more important to Mr. Libby than the snippets of conversation concerning Valerie Wilson and thus caused him to confuse or misremember those snippets when asked about them months later.”</i> … The drafters of CIPA contemplated that the “statement admitting relevant facts” would be a statement admitting relevant “facts,” not a statement of conclusions the defense wants the jury to draw.  The government has offered a statement admitting relevant facts that serves the purposes contemplated by CIPA, in addition to  proposing <b>detailed substitutions for all of the relevant classified exhibits</b>…<br />
…<br />
In fact, during the Section 6(a) hearings, even defendant admitted that balancing of the government’s right to hold people accountable  for criminal activity and not subvert the process through graymail is proper at the Section 6(c) stage: [by Mr. Cline:] <i>“And I think when we get to the substitution phase, that is where Congress sought to find a way of balancing these needs.”</i> … <b>Now that the Court is at the Section 6(c) stage, defendant conveniently seeks to avoid such balancing.</b> </p>
<p>- Special Counsel Fitzgerald 11/16/06, including key quotes from a sealed 11/14 defense filing</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There seems to be a continuance for at least one more CIPA Section 6(c) hearing, perhaps until after the Judge returns from vacation next week, but the graymail threat is coming down to the wire.  The Judge will be ruling, and when he does, he will either make or break the graymail threat of dismissal of this case (prior to any government appeal).  From the sound of this new government filing, Libby is now pulling out all the stops to get the case dismissed by way of a classified information graymail ruling…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dlake</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/16/chris-dodd-puts-constitutional-rights-on-the-american-agenda/#comment-385754</link>
		<dc:creator>dlake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 05:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/16/chris-dodd-puts-constitutional-rights-on-the-american-agenda/#comment-385754</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The media did not say anything because it was something announced by a democrat and points up to the hollowness and nastiness of the beloved gop.  It puts thier beloved Bush in a bad light.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The media did not say anything because it was something announced by a democrat and points up to the hollowness and nastiness of the beloved gop.  It puts thier beloved Bush in a bad light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P J Evans</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/16/chris-dodd-puts-constitutional-rights-on-the-american-agenda/#comment-385701</link>
		<dc:creator>P J Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 04:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/16/chris-dodd-puts-constitutional-rights-on-the-american-agenda/#comment-385701</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh good, a senator with cojones. We need more like him, at least for this sort of thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh good, a senator with cojones. We need more like him, at least for this sort of thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dab from CT</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/16/chris-dodd-puts-constitutional-rights-on-the-american-agenda/#comment-385692</link>
		<dc:creator>dab from CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 04:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/16/chris-dodd-puts-constitutional-rights-on-the-american-agenda/#comment-385692</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-385557&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Lou Costello @ 8 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;At least one senator from CT has the American people in the mind.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Exactly my thoughts. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Members of the progressive community in CT are looking at ways to provide support for Dodd - in contrast to our total lack of support for Lieberliar.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-385557"><em>Lou Costello @ 8 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>At least one senator from CT has the American people in the mind.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Exactly my thoughts. </p>
<p>Members of the progressive community in CT are looking at ways to provide support for Dodd &#8211; in contrast to our total lack of support for Lieberliar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: expat</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/16/chris-dodd-puts-constitutional-rights-on-the-american-agenda/#comment-385677</link>
		<dc:creator>expat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 04:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/16/chris-dodd-puts-constitutional-rights-on-the-american-agenda/#comment-385677</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;And you too perris, thanks for your thoughts on this&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you too perris, thanks for your thoughts on this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Chapman</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/16/chris-dodd-puts-constitutional-rights-on-the-american-agenda/#comment-385663</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 04:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/16/chris-dodd-puts-constitutional-rights-on-the-american-agenda/#comment-385663</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As I recall there were going to Constitutuional challenges to MCA “within days”. What happened to that? Is anything coming up through the courts?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I recall there were going to Constitutuional challenges to MCA “within days”. What happened to that? Is anything coming up through the courts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scarecrow</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/16/chris-dodd-puts-constitutional-rights-on-the-american-agenda/#comment-385659</link>
		<dc:creator>scarecrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 04:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/16/chris-dodd-puts-constitutional-rights-on-the-american-agenda/#comment-385659</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-385647&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Kathryn in MA @ 85&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;i’m not finished with print and i’m not even started on TV&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You’re a saint.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-385647"><em>Kathryn in MA @ 85</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>i’m not finished with print and i’m not even started on TV</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You’re a saint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
