<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Put Up Or. . .</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/15/put-up-or/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/15/put-up-or/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:45:13 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rudy</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/15/put-up-or/#comment-384078</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/15/put-up-or/#comment-384078</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;chuck the fuck….the reason why I will never give one penny to any democratic organization he is connected with…this piece of shiite shares a mutual admiration society membership with ole rape gurney joe.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the mf screwed Ned Lamont and for that I will never forgive him. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Howard Dean…if you or any of your troops are reading this…I will gladly contribute. Just make sure that the stench of schumer, lie berman, and carsmell are not involved…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chuck the fuck….the reason why I will never give one penny to any democratic organization he is connected with…this piece of shiite shares a mutual admiration society membership with ole rape gurney joe.</p>
<p>the mf screwed Ned Lamont and for that I will never forgive him. </p>
<p>Howard Dean…if you or any of your troops are reading this…I will gladly contribute. Just make sure that the stench of schumer, lie berman, and carsmell are not involved…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/15/put-up-or/#comment-384038</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/15/put-up-or/#comment-384038</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-383733&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;TheOtherWA @&lt;br /&gt;
                21              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mark-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I am fast losing confidence in Fitz. He should speak up or get out.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fitz isn’t a politician. He speaks in legal filings and courtrooms. Period. Don’t be so impatient.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Granted, but he is giving the appearance of playing politics. After all this time– and notice the mid-terms just passed so if Fitz raises his hand now it will look political– the guy needs to lay down his cards. This is beginning to look like one of those investigations that go on and on and on with no meaningful conclusion. We all know the basic outline of what happened. If he can’t prove it by now, either he is too cautious, political or just doesn’t have the goods.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-383733"><em>TheOtherWA @<br />
                21              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Mark-
</p>
<blockquote><p>I am fast losing confidence in Fitz. He should speak up or get out.</p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p>Fitz isn’t a politician. He speaks in legal filings and courtrooms. Period. Don’t be so impatient.</p>
<p>Granted, but he is giving the appearance of playing politics. After all this time– and notice the mid-terms just passed so if Fitz raises his hand now it will look political– the guy needs to lay down his cards. This is beginning to look like one of those investigations that go on and on and on with no meaningful conclusion. We all know the basic outline of what happened. If he can’t prove it by now, either he is too cautious, political or just doesn’t have the goods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pow wow</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/15/put-up-or/#comment-384025</link>
		<dc:creator>pow wow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/15/put-up-or/#comment-384025</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, Chuck…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know you have a supreme ego and an arrogant vanity to go with your superior intellect and clever abilities.  So I can imagine it was torture for you to write even the soft-pedaled mea culpa you came up with in your Kos diary.  Thus, it may be a sincere message, though rather submerged.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But you know, there’s that whole AIPAC/Likud loyalist thing going on with you and yours. So  this is all pretty easy for you to say &lt;b&gt;now&lt;/b&gt; (AIPAC won’t really mind), in an effort to forestall further damning details out of the Lamont campaign concerning you and Harry Reid.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From where I’m standing, you need to do one thing first and above all, Senator Schumer: &lt;b&gt;apologize for and admit your error in supporting the violent invasion and occupation of Iraq&lt;/b&gt;.  &lt;i&gt;After&lt;/i&gt; you’ve publicly done that, and privately called and apologized to Paul Hackett (even if he isn’t willing to accept an apology from you), &lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt; made some public effort to explain your behind-the-scenes support for Lieberman against Lamont post-primary, I’ll start listening to your words with the assumption that they are spoken in good faith.  I’m not interested in a permanent American military base covering the country formerly-known-as-Iraq, maintained just so that the US can play the Middle East heavy on Israel’s (Likud Party) behalf.  Nor do I believe that the “national interests” of the USA are enhanced, or even maintained, by lusting after and stealing Iraq’s oil revenues to improve the plush bottom lines of American or Saudi stockholders.  So I won’t be lining up behind you, no doubt, any time soon.  Others will quite probably be more forgiving of your imperial foreign policy views - although these days those others generally call themselves Republicans (just ask Holy Joe).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Your standards have fallen so, so low in your unprincipled pursuit of “winning” at any and all cost, that you have a lot of climbing to do to get back in the good graces of the informed American voter.  Your diary is a baby step.  Keep climbing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Chuck…</p>
<p>I know you have a supreme ego and an arrogant vanity to go with your superior intellect and clever abilities.  So I can imagine it was torture for you to write even the soft-pedaled mea culpa you came up with in your Kos diary.  Thus, it may be a sincere message, though rather submerged.</p>
<p>But you know, there’s that whole AIPAC/Likud loyalist thing going on with you and yours. So  this is all pretty easy for you to say <b>now</b> (AIPAC won’t really mind), in an effort to forestall further damning details out of the Lamont campaign concerning you and Harry Reid.</p>
<p>From where I’m standing, you need to do one thing first and above all, Senator Schumer: <b>apologize for and admit your error in supporting the violent invasion and occupation of Iraq</b>.  <i>After</i> you’ve publicly done that, and privately called and apologized to Paul Hackett (even if he isn’t willing to accept an apology from you), <i>and</i> made some public effort to explain your behind-the-scenes support for Lieberman against Lamont post-primary, I’ll start listening to your words with the assumption that they are spoken in good faith.  I’m not interested in a permanent American military base covering the country formerly-known-as-Iraq, maintained just so that the US can play the Middle East heavy on Israel’s (Likud Party) behalf.  Nor do I believe that the “national interests” of the USA are enhanced, or even maintained, by lusting after and stealing Iraq’s oil revenues to improve the plush bottom lines of American or Saudi stockholders.  So I won’t be lining up behind you, no doubt, any time soon.  Others will quite probably be more forgiving of your imperial foreign policy views &#8211; although these days those others generally call themselves Republicans (just ask Holy Joe).</p>
<p>Your standards have fallen so, so low in your unprincipled pursuit of “winning” at any and all cost, that you have a lot of climbing to do to get back in the good graces of the informed American voter.  Your diary is a baby step.  Keep climbing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pachacutec</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/15/put-up-or/#comment-383964</link>
		<dc:creator>Pachacutec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/15/put-up-or/#comment-383964</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-383916&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;KnotIookin @&lt;br /&gt;
                116              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;was that diary on DK REALLY from chuck schumer?  he is my senator and it sure didnt sound like it came from him….could he have assigned an intern to post something to the net roots?  he didnt even mention the net when he took ALL credit for the democratic victory for himself in local NY interviews.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;so was that diary on dailykos really from schumer?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Did he type it or sit at a keyboard?  I’m sure he didn’t.  Did he see the statement and approve it before it was posted.  I’d be very surprised if he didn’t.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-383916"><em>KnotIookin @<br />
                116              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>was that diary on DK REALLY from chuck schumer?  he is my senator and it sure didnt sound like it came from him….could he have assigned an intern to post something to the net roots?  he didnt even mention the net when he took ALL credit for the democratic victory for himself in local NY interviews.</p>
<p>so was that diary on dailykos really from schumer?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Did he type it or sit at a keyboard?  I’m sure he didn’t.  Did he see the statement and approve it before it was posted.  I’d be very surprised if he didn’t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KnotIookin</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/15/put-up-or/#comment-383916</link>
		<dc:creator>KnotIookin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/15/put-up-or/#comment-383916</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;was that diary on DK REALLY from chuck schumer?  he is my senator and it sure didnt sound like it came from him….could he have assigned an intern to post something to the net roots?  he didnt even mention the net when he took ALL credit for the democratic victory for himself in local NY interviews.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;so was that diary on dailykos really from schumer?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>was that diary on DK REALLY from chuck schumer?  he is my senator and it sure didnt sound like it came from him….could he have assigned an intern to post something to the net roots?  he didnt even mention the net when he took ALL credit for the democratic victory for himself in local NY interviews.</p>
<p>so was that diary on dailykos really from schumer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mui</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/15/put-up-or/#comment-383878</link>
		<dc:creator>mui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 21:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/15/put-up-or/#comment-383878</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-383780&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;LindaR @ 66 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;*xyz @ 58 — I see.  I was also told my comment was “vile” which is crap.  My feelings are as valid as the next person’s, and I was just saying what it felt like.  Too often, ordinary people are used as props by the powers.  I think this post by “Schumer” at Daily Kos was just that: using Daily Kos for a “net op” and the comments to the diary as backdrop, just like soldiers at a Bush speech.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bull fkn shite.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ha! See this is what I hate some of the more male-oriented blogs. Other commenters accuse us of being vile or using strong language and being irrational when really we are exercising critical thought and justified skepticism with forceful language. I’ve seen everybody kind of fall in line at some blogs and agree on some pretty absurd stuff, whereas it seems more rare at FDL.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-383780"><em>LindaR @ 66 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>*xyz @ 58 — I see.  I was also told my comment was “vile” which is crap.  My feelings are as valid as the next person’s, and I was just saying what it felt like.  Too often, ordinary people are used as props by the powers.  I think this post by “Schumer” at Daily Kos was just that: using Daily Kos for a “net op” and the comments to the diary as backdrop, just like soldiers at a Bush speech.</p>
<p>Bull fkn shite.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ha! See this is what I hate some of the more male-oriented blogs. Other commenters accuse us of being vile or using strong language and being irrational when really we are exercising critical thought and justified skepticism with forceful language. I’ve seen everybody kind of fall in line at some blogs and agree on some pretty absurd stuff, whereas it seems more rare at FDL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passmeatissue</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/15/put-up-or/#comment-383873</link>
		<dc:creator>passmeatissue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 21:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/15/put-up-or/#comment-383873</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think Nancy has made a huge mistake backing Murtha - and my thoughts on this have nothing to do with backing Hoyer.  She made what looks like a JV political calculation far too early in the new majority game.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Murtha as leader is a bad call - just read this diary on Kos about a staffer on the AZ01 campaign who said they asked Murtha for help and he refused.  Why?  Because he’s friends with Renzi’s father.  Honestly.  That is a bunch of bullcrap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/11/15/161814/53&quot;&gt;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/11/15/161814/53&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Nancy has made a huge mistake backing Murtha &#8211; and my thoughts on this have nothing to do with backing Hoyer.  She made what looks like a JV political calculation far too early in the new majority game.  </p>
<p>Murtha as leader is a bad call &#8211; just read this diary on Kos about a staffer on the AZ01 campaign who said they asked Murtha for help and he refused.  Why?  Because he’s friends with Renzi’s father.  Honestly.  That is a bunch of bullcrap.<br />
<a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/11/15/161814/53">http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/11/15/161814/53</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: *xyz</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/15/put-up-or/#comment-383851</link>
		<dc:creator>*xyz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 21:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/15/put-up-or/#comment-383851</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-383835&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;scarecrow @ 107&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;*xyz &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;As I mentioned above, just a rhetorical request, more for Schumer’s sake than for ours. As I’ve said above, starting with my comment at 46, if Schumer persists in believing he is smarter than us and can “outwit” us, he is in for a world of pain over the next several years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don’t doubt the man’s intelligence, or yours; but I don’t see why we need him to admit/concede anything on this topic.  I’m suggesting that these are side issues, when what we care about is whether he’ll do all in his power to keep the next Alito out or oppose the next assault on the Bill of Rights (e.g, the warrantless surveillance issue, or repeal of the worst parts of the Military Commissions Act), and so on. What Rayne said: “walk the walk.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think we are actually on the same page.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reason that I want Schumer to respect and fear the progressive netroots is because I want us, the netroots to have a strong influence about all of the decisions that he will make on the important issues that you mention above.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don’t trust Schumer to do the right thing based on his moral compass, but I believe that he can be compelled by the netroots to act according to our values.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  &lt;b&gt;This will only happen if he is convinced that we in the netroots are smart enough and powerful enough to make it politically personally painful for him to betray our progressive values on the important legislation that he will have a role in drafting and ushering through.      &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, far from being a side issue, Schumer’s relationship to the netroots is the &lt;b&gt;core dynamic&lt;/b&gt; that will determine how he treats the issues that you mentioned.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-383835"><em>scarecrow @ 107</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>*xyz </p>
<blockquote><p>As I mentioned above, just a rhetorical request, more for Schumer’s sake than for ours. As I’ve said above, starting with my comment at 46, if Schumer persists in believing he is smarter than us and can “outwit” us, he is in for a world of pain over the next several years.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I don’t doubt the man’s intelligence, or yours; but I don’t see why we need him to admit/concede anything on this topic.  I’m suggesting that these are side issues, when what we care about is whether he’ll do all in his power to keep the next Alito out or oppose the next assault on the Bill of Rights (e.g, the warrantless surveillance issue, or repeal of the worst parts of the Military Commissions Act), and so on. What Rayne said: “walk the walk.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think we are actually on the same page.  </p>
<p>The reason that I want Schumer to respect and fear the progressive netroots is because I want us, the netroots to have a strong influence about all of the decisions that he will make on the important issues that you mention above.  </p>
<p>I don’t trust Schumer to do the right thing based on his moral compass, but I believe that he can be compelled by the netroots to act according to our values.</p>
<p>  <b>This will only happen if he is convinced that we in the netroots are smart enough and powerful enough to make it politically personally painful for him to betray our progressive values on the important legislation that he will have a role in drafting and ushering through.      </b></p>
<p>So, far from being a side issue, Schumer’s relationship to the netroots is the <b>core dynamic</b> that will determine how he treats the issues that you mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NorskeFlamethrower</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/15/put-up-or/#comment-383844</link>
		<dc:creator>NorskeFlamethrower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 21:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/15/put-up-or/#comment-383844</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;1,335 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Firepup Patriots:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This fight for the House floor leadership is  crucial, in a sense we are fightin’ to finally close the wounds of the Viet Nam War and at the same time stop those folks who brought us that war and wanted to make it permanent and want to make war in the Middle East permanent.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For me, as a Viet Nam Vet, this fight for Murtha is personal.  I have no love of Murtha’s politics but take this to the bank…Murtha NEVER bailed out on veterans and NEVER swift boated anyone who had seen the real thing.  In fact, as corrupt as the old Democratic machine was in it’s last days, the Democrats never forgot the veterans and never forgot the fundamentals of just who fights the wars and for whom the wars are supposed to be fought.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The real fight for the future of our democracy has begun in the backrooms in DC and in the corporate press and thru the big blogs. The forces of the DLC, Mrs. Clinton, AIPAC, the neo-cons and the oligarcy are on one side.  The military, the grunts in the trenches, the old war horses (tainted as they are)and WE are on the other side.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fight for the soul of theDemocratic Party is in the hands of Nancy Pelosi and John Murtha…we didn’t get ta vote on who was gunna fight for us or where the battle would be fought, but we can’t give up on those that are puttin’ themselves out there for us.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If Pelosi and John Murtha lose this battle for control of the House of Representatives the election results are nullified.  It’s that simple.  And if that battle is lost…we will be in Iraq until our miliotary is broken and the corporate militias are strong enough to take their place.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KEEP THE FAITH AND WATCH THEIR BACKS…AND THEIR WARTS AND THEIR WEAKNESSES!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1,335 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND..</p>
<p>Firepup Patriots:</p>
<p>This fight for the House floor leadership is  crucial, in a sense we are fightin’ to finally close the wounds of the Viet Nam War and at the same time stop those folks who brought us that war and wanted to make it permanent and want to make war in the Middle East permanent.</p>
<p>For me, as a Viet Nam Vet, this fight for Murtha is personal.  I have no love of Murtha’s politics but take this to the bank…Murtha NEVER bailed out on veterans and NEVER swift boated anyone who had seen the real thing.  In fact, as corrupt as the old Democratic machine was in it’s last days, the Democrats never forgot the veterans and never forgot the fundamentals of just who fights the wars and for whom the wars are supposed to be fought.</p>
<p>The real fight for the future of our democracy has begun in the backrooms in DC and in the corporate press and thru the big blogs. The forces of the DLC, Mrs. Clinton, AIPAC, the neo-cons and the oligarcy are on one side.  The military, the grunts in the trenches, the old war horses (tainted as they are)and WE are on the other side.</p>
<p>The fight for the soul of theDemocratic Party is in the hands of Nancy Pelosi and John Murtha…we didn’t get ta vote on who was gunna fight for us or where the battle would be fought, but we can’t give up on those that are puttin’ themselves out there for us.</p>
<p>If Pelosi and John Murtha lose this battle for control of the House of Representatives the election results are nullified.  It’s that simple.  And if that battle is lost…we will be in Iraq until our miliotary is broken and the corporate militias are strong enough to take their place.</p>
<p>KEEP THE FAITH AND WATCH THEIR BACKS…AND THEIR WARTS AND THEIR WEAKNESSES!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeddySanFran</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/15/put-up-or/#comment-383843</link>
		<dc:creator>TeddySanFran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 21:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/15/put-up-or/#comment-383843</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, scarecrow, these ARE side issues, but in that our Congress doesn’t take office until 1/07, should we let the corporatists define the debate about our party’s future?  That debate, while beloved by TradMed for its binary-ness, conflict, out-in-the-open fighting, and mysogyny, also shows our party to be fundamentally, in victory, unlike the GOP.  I think this debate, and the name-calling it devolves to in non-TradMed, is critical and should be transparent.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, scarecrow, these ARE side issues, but in that our Congress doesn’t take office until 1/07, should we let the corporatists define the debate about our party’s future?  That debate, while beloved by TradMed for its binary-ness, conflict, out-in-the-open fighting, and mysogyny, also shows our party to be fundamentally, in victory, unlike the GOP.  I think this debate, and the name-calling it devolves to in non-TradMed, is critical and should be transparent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
