
Perhaps it's just me, but I'm guessing that folks in the WH are trying to keep copies of the latest Newsweek out of the West Wing as much as possible. Yeeeeowch.
But here's the question of the day: James Baker, man who has run presidential campaigns for two Republican candidates, and who has come in as the GOP fixer of choice in any number of problems, including the 2000 election aftermath…how is it that the media can say with a straight face that the man has no agenda but bi-partisanship?
Wake up. He's about saving Junior's behind and salvaging what he can of the GOP while he's at it. This commission, for Baker and his surrogates anyway, is about saving face for the Republican party, and about GHWB not having to hang his head in shame that his son is an utter failure at his job. Again. Whatever loyalties James Baker has, they are not to W — let's just acknowledge that up front and be done with it — and they certainly aren't to some kum-bay-ya bipartisanship cooperation-fest.
For Baker, this is about saving GOP bacon. Period.
Whatever the "fix" may be, it is not going to come soon enough to salvage anything for George W. Bush. The mess that is Iraq will be hung around his neck by historians for all time. To wit: the corpses are piling up at the morgues in Baghdad in such numbers, that anonymous burial has become commonplace. To resolve that problem, people in Iraq have begun having their names and phone numbers tattooed on their thighs to make corpse identification more speedy.
Ali Abbas decided that his upper right thigh was the best place for a tattoo because no one gets tortured there.
He'd seen hundred of bodies in the city morgue and dozens of hospitals during his 18-day search for his missing uncle. He'd seen drill marks in swollen, often unrecognizable heads, slash marks across necks, bullet holes in backs, abdomens and swollen hands. He'd seen bodies that had been thrown into the river, so swollen they'd barely looked human. But by and large, the thighs had been intact.
So that's where he decided to have his name, address and phone number tattooed, in case the day comes when someone is searching for his body.
Tattoos are considered a sin in Islam, which holds that believers shouldn't deface their bodies. And tattoo shops are difficult to find in Baghdad. They're often in the basements of more reputable shops.
But at least some tattoo shops are seeing more and more Iraqis who, like Abbas, are willing to risk offending Islam to ease their families' grief in the event of their deaths. The owner of one tattoo shop in central Baghdad admitted that he'd done such tattoos, but said he didn't want to talk about it for fear that he'd be killed.
That some Muslims are getting tattoos is an intimate reflection of national chaos, and an outward symbol of the inner turmoil the chaos has created.
Some days, you read the news and you wonder if it can possibly get more appalling. After reading this, I can honestly say, "Yes, it truly can."
And what are Republicans worried about? That the President failed in doing adequate PR work prior to the election. Not that his policies are a failure. Not that the Iraq mess was a horrible mistake, and a poorly-planned one at that, from the get-go. Not that George Bush is an incompetent and bumbling President. Nope. They are worried that better PR machinations in firing Rumsfeld might have allowed them to maintain their hold on power to continue the false rose-colored-glasses charade under which we have been living the last few years. Oh yes, by all means, more rubber stamping of failure.
Selfish morons.
But, honestly, how painful is it to know that everyone in America who pays attention to politics knows that Daddy has to come in…again…and try to rescue Junior's rear-end from yet another failure?
In Houston the phones started ringing, and Bush 41 staffers were pulled away from their pizza. Reporters were calling and e-mailing: would 41 talk about 43's shake-up? The answer was no, though two perfunctory statements were issued (one for the College Station Eagle and one, as the former president put it, "for everybody else"). Still, the reality spoke for itself. Dad's team was back—a remarkable course correction in the political life of the son and, quite possibly, in the life of the nation.
The American people, as politicians like to say, spoke last week—and spoke in no uncertain terms. The 2006 vote does not suggest an eagerness for a sharp left turn. It seems, rather, to be a plea for a shift from the hard right of the neoconservatives to the center represented by the old man in Houston. The re-emergence of Iraq Study Group voices such as Baker, Gates and Alan Simpson—all longtime friends of Bush Senior—is not unlike the entrance of Fortinbras at the conclusion of "Hamlet." These are 41's men, and the removal of Rumsfeld—an ancient rival of Bush Senior's from the Ford days—is a move toward the broad middle. The apparent triumph of pragmatism over ideology on Iraq was welcome news, at least to the public. In the new NEWSWEEK Poll, 67 percent favor Bush Senior's internationalist approach to foreign policy over his son's more unilateral course.
And there is more, much more. Including this from Evan Thomas:
Baker is known for lowering expectations shortly before he delivers the goods. But he has reason to want to downplay his role and the prospects for success. Over the next month or so, the Iraq Study Group must find a middle way, a plan of action that can be characterized neither as "cut and run" nor "stay the course." Judging by the election returns and the exit polls, it's what the people want—along with an end to rancorous partisan squabbling and ideological posturing. But getting a plan—and carrying it out—will be difficult to achieve.For one thing, Baker still has to convince George W. Bush. At his post-election press conference, the president looked like a base runner trapped in a rundown, unable to go forward or scurry back. The president is probably stuck—he will have to embrace some kind of compromise approach on Iraq. He didn't look too happy about it. As he japed and mugged and fidgeted, he seemed worried by something more than Iraq or the election returns; his whole character appeared to be wrestling with some more personal, inner demon. Last week Bush's aides were resisting the story line that Bush was caught in a cosmic episode of "Father Knows Best." The president himself was said to be indifferent to the press chatter. "I don't care," he told his advisers when they asked him, the morning after the elections, how he wanted to deal publicly with the suggestion that he was picking one of his father's advisers. "He doesn't think the neocons ran him over a cliff and now he has to go to Dad," said a senior Bush aide, preferring to remain anonymous while discussing Oval Office conversations. "It's not the way he sees this. He wants the best and brightest."
Junior can't admit making a mistake — publicly or even to himself – so Poppy's pals have to end-run his ego and make him think the idea for any new advisors is all his.
I swear, this is worse than badly acted Shakespeare, isn't it? In this version, Prince Hal never gets off the sauce, Falstaff appoints himself Veep and gives himself a full set of keys to the palace, and Exeter has to set spies and sycophants in every corner to gently nudge the nation in a better direction to try and prevent the entire dynasty from collapsing in on itself from the excesses of the reign.
I don't know about you guys, but I'm waiting for Mom to step in and start cracking heads. And I do not mean Babs, either. The entire Bush Administration and the rubber stamp Republican party need a time out, for the good of all of us.
For more on why the Baker Commission doesn't even matter in the grand scheme of things, read Swopa. (H/T to John Casper.)
Related posts:





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

FITZ!
Oh great. Now I can really feel confident. George “read my lips” Bush coming to the rescue. Sheesh.
We’ve got plenty to do, folks.
Have you seen that cartoon graphic of all the little fish forming into a large fish-shaped school to eat the big fish? That’s us. :-)
Poppie and his minions can’t save Dumbya’s ass this time… he’s toast. Think about it: Father and Son failed presidencies… that’s an American first!
A thousand points of blight.
The only thing notable about the Iraq Study Group is that not a single member is a middle east expert.
The SF Chronicle printed excerpts of a new book that Bush and Rove might want to put on their famous reading list: What Was Asked of Us: An Oral History of the Iraq War by the Soldiers Who Fought It, by Trish Wood. The excerpts are powerful, and describe the situation that the soldiers are dealing with in vivid terms.
I’m guessing that the Baker Commission report will be neither powerful nor vivid. In order to have any credibility, whatever they report has to be read in light of stories like those told by these soldiers.
What I’m curious about is whether the dems on the commission will go along with saving GOP bacon, or if they will hold Baker’s feet to the fire that Bush 43 started.
In my experience as a probation officer and teaching in a public school, I have come to the conclusion that most troubled kid’s problems are a result of bad parenting from either mom or pop or both. Poppy and Babs are in control now. Wow!
Larry at 6 — Kind of in keeping with how the mess in Iraq was planned in the first place. SIGH
Christy says:
I swear, this is worse than badly acted Shakespeare, isn’t it? In this version, Prince Hal never gets off the sauce, Falstaff appoints himself Veep and gives himself a full set of keys to the palace, and Exeter has to set spies and sycophants in every corner to gently nudge the nation in a better direction to try and prevent the entire dynasty from collapsing in on itself from the excesses of the reign.
Or, BETTER than badly acted Shakespeare. I imagine Bush II, transformed, with a donkey’s head for the rest of his days….
Snout: “O Bottom, Thou art changed! what do I see in thee?”
Bottom: “What do you see? you see an ass-head of your own, do you?”
Oh, and the latest Newsweek poll? Bush is at 31%. Holden’s gonna need a ranch…
Meanwhile, if the Republicans think the “more conservative” Congress is going to save Junior, they can think again.
It turns out that Karl Rove is not the only right-winger out there who is “the math”-challenged.
George Will writes in that same soon-to-be-hidden Newsweek that the new House of Representatives will be “more conservative” than the present House (his italics). Here’s how he does The Math:
This is a nice example of absurdist logic that almost seems believable until you rub your eyes.
Here is Reality (even assuming that the D’s who beat the R’s are more conservative than the existing average of the D’s in the House), using a scale I just invented (”liberal points”):
Old: 203 D’s at 8.0 average = 1,624 “liberal points”
200 R’s at 2.0 average=400 liberal points
32 R’s at 4.0 average=128 liberal points
232 R’s with 528 liberal points = 2.28 average
Total House liberal points: 2,152
Divided by 435 Representatives
Overall average: 4.95
Change:
Now, take those 32 R’s who averaged 4.0 (128 total liberal points), and replace them with 32 new D’s who average 6.0 (192 total liberal point). Adding those 192 points to the D’s existing 1,624 totals 1,816, which does bring the D’s average down to 7.73 instead of 8.0, as Will observes. But relatively more liberal D’s have replaced relatively more conservative R’s, no matter how much Will wants to spin it.
Meanwhile, the Republicans in the House are, on average, more conservative, as Will observes, but there are fewer of them, which he doesn’t consider important.
Here is how the realmath works out:
New: 235 D’s (at 7.73 average) have 1,816 liberal points.
200 R’s at 2.0 average have 400 liberal points
Total liberal points: 2,216 (as compared to 2,152 in the old House)
New average among 435 members: 5.09
This is just to have fun with numbers, but has a serious point:
Republicans can’t do math.
And in reality Congress is a body of committees. So show me how it’s going to be more conservative. Hogwash.
The 2006 vote does not suggest an eagerness for a sharp left turn. It seems, rather, to be a plea for a shift from the hard right of the neoconservatives to the center represented by the old man in Houston.
That conclusion may not be the one they should be drawing. Bush 41 isn’t ‘center’ anything, except to the GOP. He’s still a conservative, if not a neocon.
Prof @12
Somethings never change…George Will still be full of shit in January
My first thought is that Baker is more concerned with salvaging the business interests of the Carlisle Group. But good heavens, that would be cynical.
Does anyone remember Gail Sheehy’s profiles of a half-dozen of the 1988 Democratic presidential candidates, plus Reagan (as incumbent) and GHW Bush? They were published as magazine articles and later collected into book format.
It had some very striking observations, among them:
1. GHW Bush grew up in the shadow of his famous Senator father, and spent his life trying to compensate. Do we see a pattern?
2. I also remember that Gore was the one person who stood out as being potentially of Presidential calibre. And that was almost 20 years ago.
Why doesn’t Poppy just write a memo to Junior or something. You know, “RE: Advice from one failed President to another.”
Do you see this from Bush’s Saturday radio
address? And we expect this man to change?
And the Press took aim at Kerry… even in
a time of war? Olberman material, ya think
“One freedom that defines our way of life is the freedom to choose our leaders at the ballot box. We saw that freedom earlier this week, when millions of Americans went to the polls to cast their votes for a new Congress. Whatever your opinion of the outcome, all Americans can take pride in the example our democracy sets for the world by holding elections even in a time of war.”
Omigod, did he take any middle school civics
courses?
Jack
41 and Baker may find a way to get the US out of Iraq, but that country will continue to be a hellhole for years (decades) to come.
And because of W’s complete fuckedupedness, Iraq will continue to be a terrorist breeding ground for years (decades) to come.
And the US will be no safer for years (decades) to come.
John @ 15
I hear…NSD conflict of interest waivers..
A synopsis of the Iraq Study Group:
The Iraq Study Group (ISG) had its genesis when a Republican Representative from Virginia Frank Wolf returned from what was I believe his 3rd trip to Iraq and decided that the situation there had to be reassessed. Also at the beginning of this year, Jim Baker began talking about options with various Washington insiders. At some point, these two ideas were married and on March 15, 2006 the Iraq Study Group was born. It is not a stand alone entity but was created using the resources of the US Institute for Peace, a congressionally chartered independent bipartisan entity, as the umbrella organization. Parenthetically, the USIP’s current head is J. Robinson West of PFC Energy strategic energy consultants primarily to the petroleum industry. Further support was given by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), the Center for the Study of the Presidency (CSP), and the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy. These associations show that the ISG was from its beginnings meant to be a reflection of Washington’s institutional and Establishment foreign policy heavy hitters.
The ISG site is here under US Institute for Peace: http://www.usip.org/isg/index.html
The ISG is made up of the “principals” listed below and 4 expert working groups comprised of some 40 individuals which will do most of the actual work. These subgroups are to look into:
1) The strategic environment in Iraq and the region
2) The economy and reconstruction
3) The security of Iraq and key challenges to enhancing security within the country
4) Political developments within Iraq following the elections and formation of the new government
The list of who is in these groups is here:
http://www.usip.org/isg/workin…..ml#economy
The Principals:
The Democrats:
Lee Hamilton, Democratic Representative from Indiana for 34 years, served on Foreign Affairs and Intelligence Committees, vice chairman of the 911 Commission, and director of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. From wiki, “As chair of the Select Committee to Investigate Covert Arms Transactions with Iran (Iran-Contra), Hamilton chose not to investigate President Ronald Reagan or President George H. W. Bush, stating that he did not think it would be “good for the country” to put the public through another impeachment trial.” He worked with James Baker previously when he co-chaired the Baker-Hamilton Commission to Investigate Certain Security Issues at Los Alamos.
Vernon Jordan, Jr., Washington power broker and advisor to the Clintons, Senior Managing Director with Lazard Freres & Co. LLC an investment banking firm, no foreign policy experience.
Leon Panetta, White House Chief of Staff to Bill Clinton 1994-1997, domestic, civil rights, and budget experience, no foreign policy experience.
William Perry, Secretary of Defense under Bill Clinton 1994-1997, came up through the defense industry and Pentagon, broad foreign policy and defense experience. Helped enforce the policy of containment in Iraq.
Chuck Robb, mostly conservative Democratic Senator from Virgina 1989-2001 (lost to George Allen), served on the Armed Services, Foreign Relations, and Intelligence Committees, Chairman of the Iraq Intelligence Commission set up by Bush in 2004. This Commission found that the intelligence community was wrong about everything to do with Iraq but that there had been no political pressure on the intelligence community to modify its assessments.
The Republicans:
James Baker III, longtime Bush family friend, consigliere, and fixer, WH Chief of Staff to Ronald Reagan 1981-1984, Secretary of the Treasury 1985-1988, National Security Council, Secretary of State 1989-1992, WH Chief of Staff to Bush I 1992 to end of term. In 1993, founded the James Baker III Institute of Public Policy at Rice University, chief legal adviser to Bush II during the 2000 Florida recount. His presence and guiding role behind the Iraq Study Group is seen as an intervention of Bush I and his advisors to salvage Bush II’s Presidency and Bush I’s legacy.
Sandra Day O’Connor, Reagan appointee to the Supreme Court 1981-2006, swing vote in the Rehnquist court, no foreign policy experience
Robert Gates replaced by Lawrence Eagleburger (Nov.10, 2006), National Security Council staff 1974-1979, CIA careerist, nominated to be the Agency’s head in 1987 but withdrew because of his involvement in Iran-Contra, renominated and confirmed he served as DCI 1991-1993, became President of Texas A&M in 2002, nominated by Bush II to be Secretary of Defense on Nov. 8, 2006.
*Lawrence Eagleburger, assistant to Henry Kissinger when he was National Security Adivisor 1969-1971, Acting Secretary of State to GHW Bush replacing James Baker 1992.
Edwin Meese III replaced Rudolph Giuliani (resigned May 24, 2006 because he didn’t have the time), National Security Council 1981-1985, Attorney General 1985-1988 under Ronald Reagan, was involved in Iran-Contra mostly in covering up Reagan’s role in it, helped develop the conservative constitutional view of “original intent”, aside from his time on the NSC no foreign policy experience.
Alan K. Simpson, Senator from Wyoming 1979 to 1997, Republican Whip 1985-1995, no foreign policy experience.
When you look at the 10 ISG principals, you will notice there are no neocons included. 5 (Jordan, Panetta, O’Connor, Simpson, and Meese) have little or no foreign policy experience. All of the Republicans after Giuliani’s departure and Eagleburger’s arrival were Westerners. All of them also had connections to either Reagan or Bush I’s Administration (Baker, Meese, and Gates, in particular). What is probably less known is that 3 of the 5 Democrats (Jordan, Panetta, and Perry) had close links with the Clinton Administration. In other words, the Iraq Study Group is not just a Bush I vehicle but reflects a considerable input from Clinton. Remember all of the pal-ing around between Bush Sr. and Bill? Well, this appears another instance of it.
The Gates nomination for Secretary of Defense is objectionable because of his Iran-Contra past and the charge that he “cooked” intelligence, but that is not the game being played here. Gates is the ISG’s man, which is to say Bush I’s and probably even Clinton’s. It will be interesting to see what positions the Establishment Dems stake out do during the confirmation process in this light. In any case, it is clear that if Gates is confirmed (and I’m betting he will be), he will be Bush I’s Secretary of Defense and not Dubya’s
Completely agree. Baker will try and wallpaper the Democrats with Iraq bi-partisanship to inoculate the GOP for the 08 elections.
The Iraq Study Group has a few purposes.
Iraq is the second largest debtor nation, the largest is of course the U.S. Baker has secured Iraq’s debt by having financial institutions friendly of his representation pick up Iraq’s debt marker. The same way a gamblers debt is picked up by a street shark for a profit.
Baker’s group provides the political cover to get out without actually having to tell the Reich Wingers that Iraq was never about terrorism and fighting the made up GWOT there.
Prof@12 George Will thinks that Dems elected from former republican districts will be more conservative I wonder if he remebers Newt’s congress they took a lot of Dem seats and were not “moderate ” at all. They ran on the contact with America and demonizing Clinton. We well we don’t cover up for Child Molesters and we don’t like the war. Newt went to far right and tried grabbing to much power by shutting down the government and trying to impeach Clinton over a BJ. However our center Dems seem to want to go in the other direction and give up the mandate they do have to change things.
As long as we’re riffing on the Henry plays, imagine what Agincourt would have looked liked under a Prince Hal instead of an all-growed-up Henry V. A lot like Iraq, forsooth.
Hugh at 21 — interesting stuff. I’ve been wondering since the Gates nomination got floated how pissed off Cheney and the neo-cons must be. Not just because Rummy, their man on the spot, got fired…but because Bush is considering installing a CIA fella in the DoD. That’s anathema to Cheney, given how much he and Rummy tried to do to consolidate power and monetary control of intel in the DoD. And now, suddenly…well, that can’t be remotely palatable. I’d love to know the backstory on all of this.
Earlier this morning the CNN.com poll was asking if Iraqi Sunnites and Shi’ites will ever live in peace together. The choices given as answers were only yes/no … the question is not that simple, and neither is any real-world answer.
Thanks Hugh, wrt Alan Simpson, he thinks DeadEye is a terrific hunter:
mediamatters
Hugh @ 21…
Regarding Edwin Meese…Might want to add… Porn investigator and ordered crackdown on student protesters… to his credentials…
Larry
red_neck_repub @
4
And, they’ll no doubt try for the trifecta with Jeb.
_
FYI – For those that care or like to look at lots of numbers and graphs, American University has an 82 page look at the voting trends of this last election called Bush, Iraq Propel Modest Turnout Increase Ending 12-Year Republican Revolution: Dems Higher Than Gop For First Time Since 1990 . The PDF link is at the bottom of the page.
They basically said that Dems have the Opportunity to become a national party again but it’s not a certain thing. It will all depend upon the actions we take now.
John Casper @ 22
And that my friend is what this Iraq Study Group BS is really all about
Christy Hardin Smith @
26
Christy – Larry Johnson’s comments that he posted on his blog this past Saturday are appropriate to mention here:
http://noquarter.typepad.com/m…..ping_.html
lisadawn82 @ 31
Must have been written by the Committee for Stating the Glaringly Obvious.
EvilDrPuma @ 34
I kinda over simplified just by skimming over the info on their website. I’m going to print this out tonight and go over it at home.
For some time now, I have been following interlocking directorates, and ran across the board of trustees for CSIS. Here is the link, notice the familiar names on the list…
http://www.csis.org/about/trustees/
EvilDrPuma at 8:42 am
LMAO.
The entire Bush Administration and the rubber stamp Republican party need a
time out, time over for the good of all of us.We have got to stop calling Bush and the rest of these criminals, conservative. The last six years have been the most radical in American history.
Larry @
6
The ISG has, in my opinion, two purposes: the first is to secure the financial interests that James Baker III represents, and the second is to provide some cover to get W. out of a world of pain.
Given their use of “Middle East Experts” in the runup to Gulf War III, I’m not sure that the experts willing to participate would be of much use. That being said, the 40 or so named staff level people are good, and none of the “bad apples” of the runup (Ken Pollack) are in the mix.
It could be a lot worse than it is.
Wait, one of the accolades BigDog got for bipartisanship was having GOPer William Perry as SecDef. Now, on B/H-ISG, he counts as a Democrat? That’s fishy.
Also:
I do not recall BushOne on any ballot or in any poll question, but I suppose realism in (pursuit of oil and international coalitions for) foreign policy will always be associated with Poppy not having marched to Baghdad in IWOne
NORM: Waxworks visitor casts vote early
President Bush’s wax likeness is taking a thumpin’ these days at Madame Tussaud’s celebrity waxworks in Las Vegas.
Bush’s head suffered about $25,000 in damages when a Madame Tussaud’s visitor attacked it the day before last week’s elections.
“No one’s pushed one over before,” said Jack Taylor, spokesman for the tourist attraction.
Bush has needed repairs a number of times, mostly from having his nose pinched, Taylor added.
“This was the most damage” to one of the wax figures, he said. “People are always touching them, but this was pretty rare.”
The wax creations, ranging from John F. Kennedy to George Clooney to porn star Jenna Jameson, cost between $200,000 and $250,000 to produce.
The back of Bush’s head was damaged in the fall, “but he’s been back on his feet for several days now,” Taylor said.
http://tinyurl.com/ueflx
Nothing about the culprit
OT, the Chicago Tribune had a reporter with Rahm during the campaign, the story is in yesterday’s paper.
scory @ 40
And Amb. Wilson said yesterday that ISG’d heard him out, which is rather astonishing.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 26
Me too. Somebody forced Gates down Dubya’s throat and I for one would like to know who precisely did it, where and when. Was it engineered on one of his passes through Crawford? It had to be all set up before the election, but I think Bush stayed on the fence wrt to dumping Rummy until the election results came in. If they had been better, Bush would have stonewalled and kept Rummy. They weren’t and he was gone. Now barring something unexpected, Bush will have Gates as SecDef but he probably doesn’t want him. So even if the ISG does come up with some workable recommendations, Bush may foot drag on them.
I agree with Swopa that the situation in Iraq is so bad that ISG recommendations predicated on actions of the Iraq government are non-starters. What he does not address is that whatever the Iraqis choose to do, or not do, we still have the power to make choices about what we do.
How did this “bipartisan” commission become the creature of one of the most partisan operatives in business today: James Baker? Is Lee Hamilton a potted plant? If I were a member of the commission, I would resign right now, to disassociate myself from Baker’s agenda.
And what is Baker’s agenda? We had a pretty good idea going into this. The most important feature? Baker is not concerned with Iraqi lives. I can’t get past that. The most obscene aspect of George’s Iraq adventure becomes a side issue when the “grownups” start talking.
Here’s what I imagine Baker is protecting:
* The clients of the GOP, particularly the oil companies and the financial institutions
* The GOP, to preserve some vestige of the party of privilege
* The power and influence of the clients of the GOP, even it it comes at the expense of the power and influence of the United States
* The criminal and civil vulnerabilities of the perpetrators, from Little George on down
* The Bush family fortune
* James Baker’s reputation as a mover and shaker
This is not the person to whom this nation should be turning in this time of peril and hope.
red_neck_repub @
4
Actually, it’s a second — John Adams failed (alien and sedition act, election of Jefferson) and the corrupt electoral college bargain that installed his son, John Quincy Adams, led to the election of Andrew Jackson, and the Democratic Party populist revolution.
I am sick of Texas. But we do have a chance to steal a House seat in Texas this December. Henry Bonilla (R-TX) failed to obtain a majority in the open primary on 7 Nov for the 23rd District. And now he must face Ciro D. Rodriguez, a true South Texas progressive. We need to support Ciro and start putting pressure on the Bush’s in their backyard.
It’s the same old story, isn’t it? From getting his eminently draftable ass into the TANG, from which he promptly deserted to the Harvard MBA program (amazing for a C-student); to saving him from Harken Energy it’s always been a trail of cleaning up after Junior.
Now the mess is more substantial, and there is no easy fix. The Baker Commission report will provide some cover for Bunnypants and the republicans, but implementation will probably still be left up to Dear Leader, since I’m sure that 41 will only push so far, especially in light of all this publicity of him cleaning up yet another mess.
The Democrats need to make sure that before taking this vaunted Baker commission/ISG II report to heart that they can live with it, and have veto power over it’s execution, or if it fails we’re gonna get stuck with it in ‘08 (”hey, the Democrats went along with the bi-partisan Baker report…”), and that might be the worst outcome of all.
Junior is proving himself to be an unrequited NeoCon/PNAC enabler despite the events of the last week (see: John Bolton), there is no reason to believe that he (and Rove and whomever Rove works for in 2008) would not jump on any failures traceable back the implementation as “Democratic failure” and do a little of the famoush Rovian political ju-jitsu.
Joint Chiefs Chairman: Administration Is Pursuing Same Terrorism Policy Bush Trashed In 2004
“The last time a midterm election brought this kind of change to the Washington power structure, reporters and pundits explained that it was more than the product of clever election strategy, a couple of scandals or a failed policy. Instead, we were told in 1994 that the results at the ballot box signaled something deeper and more fundamental: a shift in Americans’ beliefs.”
“The country has unmistakably moved to the right,” wrote The New York Times the day after Republicans took both houses of Congress. “The huge Republican gains also marked a clear shift to the right in the country,” said The Washington Post. Similar notes were sounded after Republican wins in 2002 and 2004.”
“Yet, for some reason, we have yet to hear the opinion-makers tell us that Tuesday’s election means that the country has “moved to the left.”
“Yet if recent experience is a guide, we shouldn’t be too surprised that pundits haven’t spotted a shift to the left in the rejection Republicans suffered Tuesday. This has been the pattern in recent years: When Democrats win, we’re told it was a matter of circumstance or an unusually skillful candidate. When Republicans win, we’re told it was because Americans are becoming more conservative.”
“Why? Because many members of the media have internalized the attacks conservatives have made on them for decades and come to adopt the complimentary conservative picture of what America is all about.”
Raw Story – Anthrax hoaxer may be Free Republic poster: Developing…
Christy Hardin Smith @ 26
Christy,
Information Clearing House has an article today called “Cheney’s Revenge” which addresses this very issue: Cheney’s rage.
It’s also reprinted at trueblueliberal.com.
My question for six years is, how was it possible that America became hostage to one man’s Oedipal battle?
When looking at the make up and areas of the “expert working groups”, I was struck by how the areas all seemed to be about what is best for the U.S. It seems to me that the United States’ best interest and the Iraqi people’s best interest are not the same. I hope that I am wrong, but it looks like they are destined to come up with a new version with the same flawed perspective.
twolf1 @ 51
You know, I didn’t think the McVeigh wannabees were going to show up this soon, but this is a shoe I was expecting would drop.
Damn.
twolf1 at 52 — Yeah, Alternet had something on that this morning. What an idiot.
Well, of course, Bush I looks like Plato compared to Bush II. Still in all, let’s don’t forget how poorly Mr. Maturity did in 1992 and how much the populace turned their back on him…even with Baker and Gates.
John Casper @ 22
Yes, and we can’t let them do it. This is Jr.’s mess, he needs to figure a way out of it. The Democratic Congress is here to provide oversight and prevent him from making any more blunders. We can certainly do better and look out for the best interests of our troops, but Democrats cannot take ownership of the fiasco.
There is no good solution.
JB3 got the world to write-off its Iraqi debt post-invasion. He’s been waiting to mop this up since then. Gates is his man; Rummy had to go. Under the JB3 “concensus” model, Junja gets presented with:
1 page, 1 paragraph, 1 box to check, 1 “sign here” line.
No more options, no more debating, no more hard preznitting, just Decidering and Bike-Riding. Oh, and W gets to keep his long-overdue Vietnam appointment this week, too. Lotsa flying around in the BigPlane and visiting these next two years.
Jeb! to the U.N., methinks.
OT..I missed this yesterday.. http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/ posted by Howie Sun. 9:26 PM..His take on Hoyer vs Murtha…I am simple-minded; at point in time Nancy should get what she wants. If Steny is the majority leader, she will always be watching her back.
puzzled @ 46
Potted plant. Very likely on both counts.
Steve at 59 — Howie did an interview with Steny yesterday — don’t know if he’s gotten it written up and posted as yet. We’ve also got a conference call with Murtha coming up as well, so there will be more on that end of things. It’s a fluid decision process at the moment, and I know that Iraq is a huge factor in it, as is loyalty issues to Pelosi for a number of folks in the House.
twolf1 @ 51
This guy Chad Castgana does seem like an INTERESTING fellow:
http://www.haloscan.com/commen…..55#1397956
Kurt Vonnegut thinks Bush is the syphilis president. From “Vonnegut’s last paid speech.”
http://peaceandjustice.org/art…..6090609596
Stephen Parrish, CPA @ #33,
Larry Johnson’s take on Cheney’s eclipse as part of Rumsfeld’s firing is interesting. Johnson – Cheney and Rumsfeld shared the same world view of the NeoCon crowd, which included a fierce distrust and anger toward the CIA. During the last five years Cheney assisted Rumsfeld’s quest to set up a completely independent intelligence operation in the Department of Defense. At least with the DOD intel capability, the Pentagon and the White House could ignore the CIA view.
I’ve been talking and writing about the Pentagon Office of Special Plans and IDF/Likud access to that office since March, 2004. Many of us were concerned about the special access granted a foreign power to our intelligence production, analysis and distribution since before the Iraqi invasion.
But maybe the OSP-IDF marriage attenuated the Likudniks more than it encouraged them. With the “clean break” (no pun intended – well, maybe a little pun) with the neo-cons implied by Rumsfeld’s firing and the ISG report, we have neo-cons like Perle making statements like this one over the weekend:
Some analysts say that it would have been better for Israel to attack Syria during the recent war with Hizbullah. Syria has consistently supplied Hizbullah with weapons, and according to recent UN reports, has continued to smuggle arms to the organization despite an international embargo. “If they had acted against Syria during this last kerfuffle, the war might have ended more quickly and better,” American analyst Richard Perle said.
“Syrian military installations are sitting ducks and the Syrian air force could have been destroyed on the ground in a couple of days,” Perle continued.
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/S…..2378379290
Were people like Perle easier to control when they were auxiliaries of the Bushistas, or is their independence without having been fully discredited even more dangerous?
these guys are going to be kicking the
neocons out. that’s the real meaning
behind what’s going on. naturally, it
has nothing to do with bi partisanship,
which is almost irrelevant in regards
to the question of the war.
consider this: the admin could have
replaced rumsfeld with lieberman and
in turn held onto the senate (on account
of the fact that the governor of CT is
republican and would have been able
to appoint a republican replacement
for lieberman)
instead we got gates.
that’s how important it is to the bush
baker crowd to fix this mess over there.
scory @ 40
I guess you’re right…at least this pig is wearing lipstick…
1,333 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN GOEZ ON AND ON AND..
Citizen Hardin Smith and the Firepup Patriots:
Our experience with the bloodless coup of 2000 and the subsequent dismantling of the institutions of representative democracy have exposed once and for all the class structure and institutionalized oligarchy in the good old USofA. The slow squeeze of the monied class on what remains of our elected leadership and the exposure of the existing Democratic Party leadership (read Mrs. Clinton and the AIPAC laundry)as nothing more than Potemkin storefronts, leaves us with a moment for history changing….a moment but no more.
I think that the field for candidacies for ‘08 is bein’ streamlined and the real progressives in the Democratic Party are tryin’ ta take down the interference for Al Gore to take Mrs. Clinton down.
I think we gotta fight on 2 fronts…we gotta keep the lights on the Democrats in the Congress for the next 12 months and we hafta bring Al in from the cold real soon.
Another Clinton presidency would be the end of any semblance of democracy in our country.
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNTITION THE NEXT BATTLE HAS ALREADY STARTED!!!
Lou at 63 — now that’s just sad and kinda creepy…
TeddySanFran @ 57
He may also be hoping that the long standing tradition of not criticizing the President while he/she is abroad still stands, even for someone of his ilk.
TeddySanFran @ 44
True. It remains to be seen, however, what they will do with that information. If anything.
OK,
When the Republicans had a commensurate victory in ‘94 we were told it was a “revoultion” and that was the meme that held.
It was an election and the right wing as usual pasted much loftier meanings to their victory.
Just like Bushco trying to co-opt the WWII comparisons for the “war on terra”.
We have learned that saying things are so, doesn’t make them so.
So, I am not expecting the conventional media to change their ways anytime soon.
Frankly, all the better, it means they are unwilling to analyze facts in a realistic manner and that will leave them more liable to upsets because of their misreadings and misleadings.
-GSD
My
wild assguess is it came from Baker via Rove. If Junior resists, they will start leaking stories about his Vietnam days. While Murtha, Kerry, and others were getting shot at, Junior was “guarding” the Gulf Coast from a bar while snorting coke off some stipper’s rock hard ass. (I stole that from Jane)My enduring image of George H.W. Bush is him furtively check his wristwatch during his debate with Clinton. That picture more than anything sealed his doom in the 1992 election.
Papa Bush is hardly the adept Fortinbras come to save the Danish kingdom in wreckage. Rather he is more like a re-animated and still clueless Polonius, always thinking that platitudes like “a thousand points of light” are really going to work. Papa Bush fortunately had Baker to keep disaster at bay.
Oklahoma kiddo #50,
Republicans always claim a mandate and the media never challenges them on this. The media do minimize Democratic gains. They were not as big as they might have been. They were by razor thin margins. They favored conservative Democrats, etc. This is all a continuation of spinning the election results and the spin remains mostly Republican friendly.
OT, but I have to say it at least once a day:
my contempt for Joe Lieberman will never subside.
CHS@61..I wish there was a third possibility but since Nancy has come out for Murtha, not supporting her choice would send the wrong message at the wrong time.
OT..but where does Blue America stand on the run-off elections in Tx-23 and La-02? Should we be giving money to Rodriguez and Carter?
Studs Terkel called the Bush Administration
a “burlesque show, but not a funny one.”
Indeed.
Bush should make himself resign…
Jack
Freud’s take on Oedipus was the urge to kill the father and marry the mother. If Jocasta looked like Barbara that might explain the gouging of the eyes with the broach pins.
I await the final act with much anticipation.
T- @ 58
Yep. I’m guessing the right-wing rationale that (fill in the blank) is not the fault of the current power holder(s) because the poor thing(s) INHERITED the problem/disaster is going to go by the wayside.
T- @ 58
This mess is certainly a Bush/Cheney/Rice/Rummy creation, and there needs to be full accountability for that, but it is now very definitely an American problem. Our strategic interests (and those of Israel as well), our ability to refocus $$ on internal economic security instead of military demands, to make progress on international humantiarian and peace-keeping matters, and to secure global climate cooperation all depend on us finding a solution to the Iraq quagmire. And I agree there are no good solutions.
Our soldiers and many Iraqis will continue to die for no other reason than our leaders made a huge blunder, and for that they should be held accountable. But even if the entire Bush regime were imprisoned for war crimes, the chaos and killing would still need to be addressed.
As to the Keith O anthrax attacks.
There were a large number of attacks and the case was jeopardized by Rupert Murdoch in the NY Post’s attempt to ridicule and emasculate Olbermann with their gossip page coverage poking fun at the incident and Keith’s alleged response.
Why does Murdoch support terrorists by hindering the police investigations.
-GSD
P.S.
Didn’t Bush meet with Olmert just prior to the whole Lebanon meltdown?
Lookout Iran and Syria.
Christy Hardin Smith @
62
Howie wrote about his talk with Rep. Hoyer last night in his essay on why neither Hoyer nor Murtha is his choice for ML:
http://downwithtyranny.blogspo…..hoyer.html
looking forward to the full interview and to the call with Murtha!
punaise @ 76
A worthier subject for our scorn will never exist.
OfT:
Shailagh chugs the CW….
http://www.washingtonpost.com/…..01185.html
chimpy – re: the thumpin’ the GOP was handed — the opposiotion party is ‘beginning to understand’ that with victory comes great responsibility
F.U. Chimpy
NorskeFlamethrower @ 68
We’d better do something!!! And Quick!!! The Hill is on a roll.
From link Lou at 63 comments:
“This guy Chad Castagana is more than a little creepy. It’s also somewhat daunting to see what’s easily Googlable on an average person, or for that matter, Chad.”
——-
TINFOIL alert — this is why it is vital for NSA and all the other abridgements of the Constitution stay in place.
–
Ed*ard at 81 — I do think it is a good thing that both candidates are willing to talk with folks at the grassroots level. And there are both good and bad things about both. Neither is my ideal candidate, to be perfectly honest, and I’m wrestling at the moment with how best to proceed in terms of leadership, because I do think that Pelosi deserves some deference and support in her choices at this point but, at the same time, I’m not sure how willing I personally am to endorse anyone in this when I don’t fully stand behind them 100%. I’m in a wait and see stance at the moment until I’ve had time to speak with and analyze both men. Being more informed is a good thing — and everyone here is, clearly, free to make their own minds up on how they think, with or without some endorsement from me or anyone else. (We are not, after all, some monolithic wingnut blog. *g*)
Sadly, No! has more on the freeper terrorist wannabe.
Chris Bowers at MYDD has written a great putdown to the Chicago Tribune
tributeagitprop garbage about Rahm E’s effect on the election:Rahm won the House of Representatives for Democrats, but it didn’t stop there.
Rahm also won the four Republican-held House seats where the DCCC candidate lost the primary, but where the primary winner went on to take the seat anyway.
Rahm raised all the money for the DNC, and was actually every small donor who contributed to the DNC.
Rahm was every donor to Act Blue.
Carol Shea Porter is actually Rahm.
Rahm won us back six Governorships. Hell, he had groomed Deval Patrick from birth for the 2006 elections.
Rahm defeated the gay marriage ban in Arizona.
Rahm took back nine state legislative Houses.
Rahm not only runs MoveOn.org, but he is all 3.3 million people on their email list.
Rahm rigging voting machines so my write-in for Democratic state committee was a certain success.
there’s more…..
http://www.mydd.com/story/2006/11/13/115342/64
Hugh @ 45
Interesting thing about Gates and his role in Iran Contra. Were it not for GJ secrecy rules, Gates might not have been confirmed the first time.
Not only that, but like Scooter gates had a memoemry defense, only in Iran Contra, the Special Prosecutor fell for it.
Pardon likely redundant info: WH briefing at 1:00 EST on C-Span. Snow expected to focus on ISG meetings. Robert Dreyfuss discussing ISG now.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 88
I’m no big fan of Pelosi, Emmanuel or Murtha, but Murtha’s stance on the war trumps some of his earlier stomping for the military-industrial complex. Pelosi is in as Speaker, so I think she should be able to build a team, rather than having to compete with Rahm for limelight.
Ed*ard Teller @ 88
Next up: find and replace Rahm’s name into the entire vast Internet canon of Chuck Norris facts.
Let’s not cross Grandma. This is an intramural fight; the blogs can blog, and citizens can communicate their choices to their representatives (well, except ME!) but, imho, this is not the time to TAKE A STAND.
Let’s appear disorganized and unable to decide. It’s a strategy that got a fence whitewashed, once.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-s…..33976.html
Sirota’s take on Hoyer
There are 4 levels to the Iraq Study Group that we need to keep in mind.
The Godfathers: George HW Bush and Clinton
The Institutions: the US Institute for Peace, the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the Center for the Study of the Presidency, and the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy
The Principals (for gravitas more than expertise): Lee Hamilton, Sandra Day O’Connor, etc.
The Working Groups: These experts are the ones who will do most of the work. Again they can be found here: http://www.usip.org/isg/workin…..ml#economy I admit I don’t recognize most of the names. If anyone does, it might be useful to develop a who’s who of them.
I suppose you could add a 5th level for James Baker who is interacting with all these levels as well as with Dubya himself.
NorskeFlamethrower @ 67
HI Norske, situation good and within expectations. Happy to work with your reading, doing it already. What I worry about: Is somebody looking after the machines (voting) and the Internets? We are still most vulnerable there.
Something else to consider about this group. They may very well be representing Saudi interests as well as the gop’s. If I was Prince Bandhur (sp??) I would be real concerned about the mess next door creeping into his domain and I would pull all the strings I have (read carlysle group)to get some new direction.
wow, awesome post. I’m a sucker for the Shakespeare stuff. Does that make me a possible NRO reader?
Billmon’s version of the Newsweek cover captures the real situation perfectly.
Is this who the ISG (Iraqwar Still Going) works for?
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news…..-515h.html
Since I believe that the first priority is finding a solution to the Iraq quagmire that includes the removal of US forces from the immediate region and a return to a policy of the US being an honest broker, I believe that it makes a lot of sense for the Democrats to put Murtha out in front, at least for now. He is the symbol of opposition to Bush’s stay-the-course policy and his position helped enable the Democratic victory.
A strong third voice is needed on Iraq. So far, we have (1) the WH (newly whitewashed with Bush 41 leftovers displacing Rummy, but still mindlessly committed to “victory,” and (2), the IRS, dominated by Republican consiglieri with suspect/conflicted motives and no representation by groups who thought the entire premise of our invasion/occupation was wrong. These people can’t get us out because there is not compromise between these two groups that can work. A strong third voice with a different view is needed that can expand the range of choices and check Bush if he remains recalcitrant (likely) — and that’s what Murtha provides.
Murtha may not be the best on many issues or over the long haul, but he’s the right symbol to represent the Dems now. Hoyer would signal that the Dems are putting the Iraq issue on lower priority and not challenging the limited choices that are likely being presented.
Pach at 97 — thanks. :) I’m a sucker for Shakespeare, too — and the ins and outs lately are screaming for a tragedy treatment, because I just cannot get myself to a point where I can find the comedy on this just yet.
This is OT, but that picture is just begging for a caption.
http://www.cnn.com/
Lee Hamilton has provided a beard for Repellican ass covering too often for me to trust him any farther than I could throw Holy Joe.
Steve @ 77
I don’t know about Rodriguez, but my son, who works for the DNC – yea, Howard! – has met Karen Carter while working in NOLA last summer and is supremely impressed with her. Don’t know if YOU want to take the advise of a 24 year old Dem operative, but I do. I’ve been supporting her campaign through direct checks to her website, and then, through ActBlue when she was FINALLY listed last month.
Smart, honest, nice, etc. Adds up to a good – clean – replacement for “Dollar Bill”. Give a little, if you can.
Christy Hardin Smith @
105
Trinculo in “The Tempest” –
Misery acquaints a man with strange bedfellows.
Hugh 98 — yeah, it struck me this time, should have been more obvious the first time I read the roll call of the principals of the ISG, that 42 figured heavily in this mess.
Here’s the next thing to keep in mind: Perry was all over NK.
Are these guys worried that doing the wrong thing in Iraq could entice NK to flare up badly?
I’m afraid sending more troops to Iraq will only send the wrong message to NK…
A bit off direct topic, yes – but no doubt tangentially related. And, my apologies in advance for any perceived harshness in tonality – BUT -
I’m actually a bit shocked that there is so little mention and relatively little discussion across the Internets (and other locales) about the self-immolation of peace-activist Malachi Ritscher. As a former Chicago resident, I can’t help but feel inclined to mention his recent deeply sad and tragic passing. It’s an undoubtedly complex situation, breathtaking on innumerable levels. But to me, it warrants discussion – particularly as he was outspokenly protesting the Iraq war.
” Last Friday morning along the Kennedy Expy. near the Ohio Street exit, a man reportedly videotaped himself as he poured gasoline onto his body and lit himself on fire, ending his life in memorably horrific fashion. The incident took place at the base of a 25-foot-tall sculpture known as “Flame of the Millennium,” and the man reportedly left a note saying, “Thou Shalt Not Kill.” “
- Richard Roper
http://www.suntimes.com/news/r…..07.article
Man sets himself on fire on Kennedy
Drivers watched as he dies near ‘Flame’ sculpture
November 4, 2006
http://www.suntimes.com/news/m…..04.article
BY ANNIE SWEENEY Staff Reporter
As horrified Friday-morning commuters watched, a man apparently doused himself with gasoline and lit himself on fire along the Kennedy Expy. near a 25-foot-tall Loop sculpture titled “Flame of the Millennium.”
A homemade sign was found near his charred body that read, “Thou Shalt Not Kill,” said State Police Lt. Lincoln Hampton. Police are reviewing a videotape that also was found near the body.
The death of the man, whose identity has not been released, was being treated as a suicide, authorities said.
Witnesses told police they saw the man ignite himself just before 7 a.m. near the southbound Kennedy’s Ohio Street exit, Hampton said.
The Chicago Fire Department was called to the scene to help extinguish the fire, which was set at the base of the seven-ton sculpture along the Kennedy.
An Illinois Department of Transportation worker was among those to witness the incident, according to a preliminary report.
A can of clear liquid smelling like gasoline also was recovered, the report said.
–
also:
http://blogs.chicagoreader.com…..t-suicide/
http://www.savagesound.com/gallery99.htm
phoebes @ 108
Rodriguez is a former rep, and the newly drawn 23rd can be won by a Democrat. See this diary.
phoebes 108 — yup, going to make a donation to Carter against Jefferson. Won’t be much in the wake of the donations I made during election, but I believe strongly we must clean our own house if we are going to convince the American people that we can clean their house.
Hugh @ 45
I’m not so sure about the forcing. The hard part was getting him to get rid of Rummy; as we learned in the Harriet Meiers debacle, the replacement was probably determined by whoever talked to him last before he decided, not by what they actually had to say. So as long at daddy’s people could keep Cheney in an undisclosed location for a few days, that’s probably all it took.
Swordswoman @ 3
That’s from Swimmy, a classic children’s book by Leo Lionni (one of my favorites growing up.)
Redshift @ 108
Recall that Cheney was in South Dakota shooting birds in a sack on Election Day…
Although i will support Carter by volunteering, I must advise everyone of the following: Karen Carter is DLC.
I thought everyone should know.
L-G@116..thanks for the heads up..I guess DLC is better than crook..Jefferson is headed to prison..I think it looks better if the Party throws him out of office first.
Rayne @ 110
Rayne — just more evidence that this is all too complicated for either Bush I or II. I found yesterday’s MTP interesting in that McCain’s call for more US troops in Iraq was based on the need for US to take down the militias, particularly the Sadr loyalists. US press has consistently painted them as all bad guys and the Maliki failing as linked to his inability/unwillingness to confront Sadr. But that’s probably another misguided American view.
But today’s NYT story on the militias presents a more nuanced picture (surprise!) in which Sadr himself may have lost some control of individual cells, but he may be trying to reign them in, to be part of the government, without losing his political force. The Americans trying to deal with this are clearly having problems figuring out who the good guys are and who the bad guys are, and at times they are working cooperatively with the Sadr forces, other times fighting their rogue elements. We don’t know who the “enemy” is.
NYT: Infuence Rises but Base Frays for Sadr
Steve @ 118
I really wanted Regina Bartholomew to qualify, but she was locked out by the various Democratic machines. She is young, and I imagine she will reappear. But Karen is what we now have. And Jefferson, although he calls himself progressive, might as well be DLC.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 105
Bush = MacBeth
Cheney/neocons = Lady MacBeth, who preyed on MacBeth’s fear of being unmanly
It ends with lots of death and killing, a hero not born of woman and a woods coming to the capital in disguise. There was no study group with options. Shakespeare understood human frailties.
NYT: We’ve got your oversight right here…come January.
I can’t wait…
New thread for everyone.
scarecrow @ 117
If McCain proposes sending troops for the purpose of confronting the Sadrists, then he’s undeniably proposing taking sides in a civil war. While Sadr himself isn’t in the government, his party is, and they’re far from the only party in the government with a militia.
Edwin Meese…The Butcher of People’s Park, head of Operation Cable Splicer, Iran-Contra confidante and dedicated pornography connoisseur – and now part of the kitty litter shuffle at ISG.
Great. Welcome to 1985.
(shakes head)
Hey db! Thanks for the get-back last night!
I responded at the end of the latenite thread.
Just for grins…new Nancy vs old Nancy!
I just loved Boltopus! Meese – he’s an OGRE! The Col. Klink of the FEMA camps no doubt!
Ollie’s been there, wants that!
On the was-Chistopher-Marlowe-Shakespeare? thesis –
Marlowe was a spy for Queen Elizabeth, and he wassupposedly murdered in a secret agent safe house.
He also tutored the young James Stuart, the future King James I. I heard a report that said Shakespeare had intimate meetings with the Gunpowder Plot conspirators; if so, Shakspeare might have played a role in foiling the Gunpowder Plot.
This would also explain why he could get away with writing MacBeth, with it’s many references to a witch obsessed illegitimate Scottish King.
Walter Raleigh was hung drawn and quartered for less.
Sonny went to daddy for a bail out (again). Daddy dispatched Baker. Baker has a reputation for fixing things up. Daddy has reams of names he can call to help sonny. No one family in America should have this kind of power. It sickens me to think that this presidency has been relegated to ‘daddy issues’.
Christy, you are right, this is about saving the bacon of GW and the Republicans. The press is very deferential to Baker, they’re just awed at how he fixed the 2000 election. Let’s continue to be clear about James Baker. He’s a hack. He works for the Bushes, he is not a leader – merely a Mr. fix it for the aforementioned. The Saudi’s are probably screaming to the Bush family to clean up this chaos. They will spread enough money around to try and make this go away. Methinks things have gone too far this time. The stink of GW has permeated the entire globe, redemption will not be possible. Even if miraculously, some stabilization of the area results, it is known that this President failed. He failed miserably, and for so long that, all the king’s horses and all the king’s men……., well you all know the rest. Whatever takes place is all about clean up. They’ll do their best, but George W. destroyed the balance of power in the mid-east and is now and forever responsible for the aftermath. There isn’t enough disinfectant in the world for Jim Baker to sanitize the President.
I made a post a few days ago that daddy was now the president and is having his second term after all.
here it is
http://www.firedoglake.com/200…..ent-379973
This Baker – Gates Deep Doo-Doo Squad intervention reminds me of the Harve Keitel character in PULP FICTION. I don’t think Gates was forced on the feckless Fratboy at all. I think it was made clear to him some time ago by people who really did have “THE math” that his sorry ass was in a sling come the morning after Nov. 7 & with congressional oversight reinvigorated in January he would end up with Rumsfeld hung around his neck for the next 2 years. Gates, then, turns out to be a two-fer: he’s not Rumsefeld & he’s a firewall at Defense, someone who knows how to duck & weave, equivocate & prevaricate with the best of them. He also knows which Bush skeletons have to be kept in the closet since he’s both one of them AND has been the curator of the closet at Texas A & M. Sally Quinn had a piece in WaPo before the election that hinted that this would be the way things might go, that it would be part of a broader plan to salvage Chimpwad Mc Smirkpuss’s “legacy” & preserve any future for the Bush league dynasty and its brain dead avatars plus to marginalize Cheney, who would be set up as the fall guy. Looks ever more likely to me, now that I’ve read the “Newsweek” article… Who knows ? The Great Fibrillator might just resign– to spend more time with his family, of course ;-)
Jim Baker has come back on the scene in order to keep the details hidden that would expose the illegal shenanigans of the Bush 41 crew during the Reagan/Bush 41 years. There’s something about how the election was stolen in 2000 they wouldn’t like to see surface, either.
Great, eloquent post, Christy.
The Tom Toles cartoon, showing daddy spanking W, is even more humiliating than the Newsweek cover — because I think it really probably bugs W that everyone is tittering about the perceived “spanking” he is receiving….
people in Iraq have begun having their names and phone numbers tattooed on their thighs to make corpse identification more speedy.
So at last here we are at Greenaway Point :-(