
(Photo of Jon Tester on election night by Reuters/Brian McDermott. This is such a great shot, and really captures the enthusiasm not just of Tester, but what I've been feeling in our comments for weeks about the work that everyone has done this election cycle. Enjoy the grin and the win!)
I was on a conference call yesterday with Speaker-to-Be Nancy Pelosi (and how fun is it to type those words after such a great Democratic victory on Tuesday?), along with a number of other progressive bloggers including Howie and Pach. We talked about particular issues of interest, including the need for reforms and accountability on a host of subjects from Iraq and war profiteering through to earmarks and election reforms. I was doing this call from the Cleveland airport -- giving the wingnutty older gentleman next to me the fits, as he peered at me over the latest O'Reilly "literature" when I started my comment with "congratulations, Madame Speaker...". (You have to take your fun where you can, when you've gotten three hours sleep and are running on espresso fumes.)
After the call, I dropped into the comments here, and I wanted to be certain that what I said didn't get lost, because it is really important for all of you to understand just how important your work was in this election cycle -- and how much the folks who sit in the power chairs really do understand that they owe those seats to all of you:
I just got off the phone with Speaker-elect Pelosi. She said to tell everyone thank you so much for everything....Nancy Pelosi has been doing these calls on a semi-regular basis for a while. This isn’t something new. That she took time to do one today [Wednesday], however, with all of the media rush and work on her plate was both gracious and telling on how she truly does understand and value the contribution that all of you made in this election. And I wanted to be certain that you all knew about it this evening — because you guys earned it and then some.
These calls are nothing new. Nancy Pelosi has been doing leadership reach-out to bloggers over the last year, and I've been on calls with her and her staffers a lot over the past few months discussing the House leadership's strategies and issues that they felt were important.
I don't say this to brag about phone calls (gah, no!), but as an illustration that some folks in the Democratic leadership -- be it Pelosi or Howard Dean or folks in Russ Feingold's office or any number of many, many others -- truly understand that having a direct connection to bloggers, who have a direct connection to readers who are real people facing real issues on a daily basis...well, that is an awfully valuable perspective, and one that by-passes the whole KStreet "pay to play" mentality that has dominated the Republican-controlled Congress the last few years. And it gives the politicians a chance to talk to folks who aren't just sucking up to them for power or some other personal gain purpose, but who are honest and "tell it like it is" (sometimes way more than they want to hear!) -- which they need and want, frankly, given how much of a bubble they live in inside the Beltway.
There are a lot of issues on which all of us are hoping for accountability. Individually, we probably rank them in differing order, but for me, re-establishing a firm grounding in the rule of law, the Constitution, and the separation of powers between the branches of government so that we are no longer operating as a parliamentary rubber stamp as the Republicans have done the last six years are at the top of my own list.
The Democratic leadership is not going to have an easy job of it. Unlike the Republican caucus, leading the Democratic caucus has always been a whole lot like herding really cranky cats. We run the gamut from the ultra-conservative Blue Dogs to the ultra liberal folks from all over.
On the House side, first Pelosi has to get elected Speaker. Although we all expect that to happen, she can't take it for granted. Then, the Democrats have to get legislation passed -- and they aren't always going to do it the way we want -- but it will be a LOT more in line with our philosophy than what we've been seeing.
I think now is a good time to take a step back and a deep breath and give Pelosi a few days to get things set up the way they need to be done to lay the foundation for a number of things. They have a LOT of things to tackle...but will only be able to do it one step at a time. We need to give her and the rest of the Democratic leadership, including a whole lot of folks who are in line to be very effective committee chairs, a little space to actually govern, while holding them to the principles that we all hold to be important. We don't set accountability aside because we won the election -- but we also should not start eating our own right out of the gate.
(And yes, I know that sounds funny after my smack Rahm around article from yesterday, but damn -- a backstabbing quote the day after the election was just wrong on his part.)
As for the Senate, things are still a bit up in the air as to how the leadership will or will not be able to really lead and, to be completely honest, I have no clue what any of us can expect from Joe Lieberman. And I think that folks on both sides of the aisle are thinking the same thing. Which is pretty much what Joe Lieberman wants, isn't it?
Honestly, though, this is a time for a little pause to let them regroup and consolidate -- we push our favorite agenda issues, but we don't rip our side apart and make demands and have tantrums, because to do so weakens their ability to negotiate with the other side. Whether we like it or not, governance is, in some measure for some things, about compromise. Advocacy is about standing on principle. We need to start being smarter about how we marry the two in order to get what we want -- and to allow them to get what they want and need as well. It's going to be an interesting dance the next few weeks.
Remember, the President has to sign off on legislation...or we have to have a veto-proof majority, and we don't have the numbers to pull that off on our own without...wait for it...more compromise and negotiation. Interesting dance, indeed, but one that I am going to thoroughly enjoy watching as the Democrats are able to lead this tango instead of having to follow.
Let's all take a little time today to enjoy and savor the victory, though. We earned this one -- together.
What I wish Rahm and some of the other media hounds had been saying all along is that the Democratic party is smart enough and strong enough to put their own individual philosophical differences aside to push toward the greater good for all of America.
What we can all agree on -- no matter our perspective or political persuasion -- is that there needs to be more accountability for elected officials. That sunshine is a good thing in goverment, and that the public has a right to know not only what their representatives are doing, but that they ought to also be told why it is being done. That corruption is bad, and bribery and self-dealing and rampant cronyism will no longer be tolerated.
That what we all want, most of all, is for our elected officials to do their jobs -- keeping in mind that they work for all of us, and that it is our benefit and our wishes, not those of their election financial backers, that ought to count for a whole lot.
And that this Democratic victory means that a majority of folks in America have had enough and that they want a whole lotta change for the better. Never forget that we are going to be watching. Our side doesn't get a pass any more than we've given one to the other side. But at the same time, let's all take a deep breath and allow the Democratic leadership a chance to lead.
I have a very good feeling that we are all going to like where things are going, come January.
UPDATE: Allen will be holding a presser at 3 pm ET — Webb to follow afterward. Looks like Allen is going to concede in VA. (Is Burns going to finally do the same in Montana?)
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
FITZ!
Mr. Fitzgerald…you may now accelerate your engines.
Agreed! We can’t do anything without a strong foundation.
I was on a conference call yesterday with Speaker-to-Be Nancy Pelosi
Christy, ma’am! Just a minute while I tell the Prince of Wales to call you a taxi!
EPU’d and OT:
David Brooks, http://select.nytimes.com/2006.....amp;emc=th spins the Democratic victory as all about the blue dogs and a repudiation of the liberal bloggers:
And:
Looks like we still have our work cut out to convince the party that the victory really came from the left, not from the center.
Oh gee, what a marvelous picture of Sen. Tester!
Lest aught of our words die unseen (from last thread)—
prostratedragon @
149
I cannot say enough thank-yous to the folks who rocked this election. Thank you Christy, thank you Jane, than you TRex, Thank you Pack, thank you Jamie, thank you Matt, thank you Firedogs everywhere.
We shall rock, we have rocked, we will have rocked, we will continue to rock. We rock on!
Allen will be holding a presser at 3 pm ET — Webb to follow afterward. Looks like Allen is going to concede in VA. (Is Burns going to finally do the same in Montana?)
Christy, next time you’re holding airport conference calls like that, you need to give the O’Reilly readers a spew warning!
That’s partly out of politeness, but also self-protection - you don’t want their coffee all over your laptop when you say “Hello Madame Speaker . . .”
If the congress could basically follow the constitution and enforce issues of human rights as well as do some serious oversight of the executive branch we will be well on the way to a democracy again.
But legislatively we need to roll back what the repub congress did.. the Patriot Act, gut big time military appropriations, dissemble the national security state including most of the CIA and her sisters spy organizations, and pass some people legislation, like health care, labor law, and reform the criminal justice system which has almost 2.5MM people incarcerated.
We need to press for term limits. We need to toss the lobbyists out and forbid any revolving doors between government and business. You can go one way, one time…
My list is very long and probably too progressive for the mainstream pols dem or repub.
But we should press for more progressive governement and laws. We need some progress not more of the republican regress.
also, did you get the sense that they will be crafting legislation that they believe bush will sign?
Why should they do that?
What’s wrong with drafting things to make him veto it to show how out of touch he is in his views and that of the rethuglicans?
Have the dems forgot how to legislate? There’s all sorts of reasons to push bills up even if you know he won’t sign them. that’s one reason right there.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 8
hurrah!
thank you, thank you, thank you VA!
What, Madame Speaker did not discuss with you the colors of the new curtains?
I’m glad she did share some other concerns.
CHS..Please drop a word that Hoyer as majority leader would send the wrong message to loyal dems. Murtha is not progressive either but by God he stood up and did the right thing when it counted. The thought of Hoyer as majority leader makes me sick.
Is Brooksie one of the most despicable people around or what?
What David Brooks says does not matter even a little. He’s a faht in a gale, as they say in Bah Hahbah.
landreau @ 15
well done! LOL and I’m with Steve @ 13 wrt Hoyer.
The corporate media is spinning like kee-razy to obviate the influence of blogs and bloggers on the democratic party. Unfortunately, their makeup and hair is so yesterday…
Christy… I know it is picky but it is “Jon” Tester, he is not just any plain John but a Jon…
100 hours, just like the lady from San Francisco said:
– minimum wage hike
– Medicare drug price negotiation
– implement the 9/11 Commission recommendations
– higher education more affordable
… then, the Homosexual Agenda!
katymine at 18 — gah! I keep doing that, and I know better. Thanks for the heads up. Clearly, I need to catch up on more sleep…I’m just plain beat.
It is vitally important that the Dems show that they can govern.
We need the people who voted for the Dems to feel good about their choice.
Yes, it does mean compromise and legislation will not have everything we want or need.
But Dems are competent for the next 2 years then 08 is ours in a landslide.
The 2007 Farm Bill is my focus and having Tester, an organic farmer, in the Senate is BIG !
CNN - george allen to make statement at 3PM eastern.
…But i see it was already reported. That’s what I get for leaving my computer for 10 minutes ;)
I’m willing to do piecemeal disassembly and removal of the evil that Bushco has done in the last five years: repeal or recall the worst parts first, then build on that to get the rest of the hermful stuff out of the system. Get the no-fly list into soem kind of useful shape, where it has at least approximate birthdates and descriptions, so they aren’t pulling people off planes based on name alone. Put habeas corpus back into the legal rights that everyone has. Re-instate the Fairness Doctrine and make Net Neutrality law.
Make it clear to the conservatives that laws must apply, equally, to everyone, and the playing field will be levelled out.
Welcome to the real world of Virginia, Senator Macaca!
Good riddance.
Taking out the trash……
I know we’re not supposed to push our pet issues, but I do hope we can propose some legislation to eliminate the exception which allows robo-calls to people on the Do Not Call list.
It’s a win, win. Anyone that votes against it, just run ads next election that so and so voted to allow the harrasing phone calls.
Please, end those damn calls.
I have to take a little bit of issue. Government is not about “compromise.” Compromise, as a strategy, is useful in any negotiating situation but not the best, first alernative in any situation.
Good government is about collaboration: the mutual understanding of good faith interests to arrive at the best possible, proverbial “win-win” solutions.
Compromise does not look at underlying interests, but at surface positions, arbitrarily splitting the difference for the sake of an end of conflict. But in some cases, further conflict is necessary for the common good in govergment, to educate the electorate, investigate the issues, understand the interests that underlie positions so as to generate new, better solutions, etc.
I think this whole ideology that says “compromise” is what government is about rests on a precondition that values are always and everywhere expendible.
I think the government people want involves good faith coming together of public spirited people. But if one side operates in good faith, and the other does not, then “compromise” is a public disservice.
Now, I’m all for Democrats building some momentum with good, popular issues, like the minimum wage, so they can reacquaint the public with what we are really about, after so many years without a platform. The point will be to build momentum and accept good faith, bargaining allies to make ideas better, improve the public good.
However, I have no expectation that any meaningful portion of the GOP side will bargain in good faith. So in reality, we will probably have to do investigations, promote good legislation that will be vetoed or passed on a party line vote, all in order to educate the public about the two sides going in to ‘08.
If, in the interim, we are asked to compromise on fundamental issues, as we were with the gutting of habeas corpus, then no go.
I know Christy agrees with all this. But I just want us to be wary of this meme that “government is all about compromise” because it’s a McCaniac/Leiberman lie.
Gaah. Need more caffeine in my system, as obviously I can’t type straight without it.
I know they are going to be busy, but I hope they revisit that trivial little item called Habeus Corpus.
Really well said Christy,
I’m really proud of you, and all of us.
Goddam this feels great.
Yesterday at his news conference while
he was saying (as near as I could tell)
that when he said stay the course in Iraq, he didn’t mean stay any particular
course, but a course to be determined
later because, not only is he the Decider, but also the Determiner, he looked to me like the a school yard
bully who is very worried about getting
his ass kicked. Mr Conyers, you’re up.
Boy do I understand Christy… what a week for me to be onsite with Clients on EDT and keep up with all this fun…. When you have hit Starbucks for the third time in a day for a Vente that you know you are over the edge!
Great post, Christy. We can give Speaker Pelosi (love typing that!), and ourselves, for that matter, a few days to savor the great win. Then we need to get on with the best solution to the problems you listed, which is public financing of elections. That would resolve the issue of what amounts to legalized bribery, and would inevitably lead to the other goals you listed, transparency, accountability, etc.
One other thing - term limits are a big mistake. I know people seem to hate “professional politicians”, but ifholding office can’t be a career choice, the only people who can run will be the rich. Big money already has too much power, let’s not institutionalize it even more.
Breaking news from MSNBC:
Report: GOP’s George Allen to concede race for Senate seat from Virginia.
It will be interesting to see how the Borg… I mean the Republican party … keeps it’s members in line now that the bugman is gone, gone, gone. So gone. Oh, and once again, thanks to you Ronnie Earle. (clapping)
CNN - chimpy stepping up to the podium
Oh, and yes, Pelosi has been very good and genuinely very respectful of communties like this one, meaning you readers. She deserves a lot more recognitin and credit online.
Who said: “bipartisanship is just another word for date rape.”
I know it was a Rethuglican. Was it Nordquist?
Why do Dems now have to play nice?
Chimpy on CNN - murkin peeople made their decision - i respect that decision.
-looking forward to working w/ pelosi et al
-1st order of business is to complete spending bill
-need to pass terrist surveillance act
twolf1 @ 35
with a bright yellow tie and dick and abu smirking uncomfortably right behind him.
Chimpy on CNN - murkin people expect us to rise above partisan differences. my admin will do it’s part.
Great post Redd- agree with you 100% as usual.
The pressure starts to become huge in January!
In the meantime- the biggest game in town is to watch Clusterfuck try to prove that he’s still relevant. Lame Duck Quacking? Not, he figures, if he can schedule a press conference every fuckin day.
Funny as hell!
Re: Holy Joe, I’m wondering if we shouldn’t just let the Republicans have him, and coax someone like Snowe or Collins in Maine to come on over to our side. They ain’t progressives, but were they to flip, I would surely trust them a lot more than I’d trust Joe to uphold anything resembling a strong progressive agenda.
Also, assuming Lieberman is playing the field, I think we could get them at a cheaper “price.”
Is this reasonable at all?
OT - I just saw upChuck on O’Reilly via C&L
http://movies.crooksandliars.c.....erIraq.mov
He’s was kissing Bill’s fanny while throwing Dean and Murtha under the bus. WTF?
Looks like he’s plastering his face everywhere in an attempt to take credit for our landslide.
O’Reilly: “We can’t be doing the Howard Dean, John Murtha thing - let’s get the hell out and we don’t care what the unintended consequences are”
Schumer: “Right”
Chimpy on CNN - don has been an outstanding sec of def, and a friend (and a douchebag)
he will stay until Bob is confirmed.
presser over
RagingGurrl @ 41
More O’Rielly over at Thinkprogress:
O’Reilly’s Plan For Iraq: Stop Being ‘This Crazy Country’
Pach — agreed on collaboration v. compromise. I think it is both, actually, but I’m still so exhausted from the travel and the election push that my brain isn’t completely functioning this morning. I’ll probably revisit this at some point next week when I’ve caught up on a few zzzzs. lol
ugh, sorry, double post.
CNN - bush having breakfast with Harry Reid and Dick Durbin tomorrow.
I wonder if in his filofax, it’s listed as ‘harry dick for breakfast’?
Upchuck Shumer… is my (ugh) Senator, and is still controlled by AIPAC. The corruption is far from over, kids.
Oh, and egregious, am sipping some English Breakfast tea as I type here. You are such a sweetie!
Is it me, or was that incredibly short Bush presser in the Rose Garden exceptionally pissy, stilted and weird?
Christy Hardin Smith @ 49
What can he say? He just lost power — and not the way the Iraqis do every day.
Savor victory, but the Bush/Cheney martial law apparatus needs to be dismantled fast. The Military Commissions Act and the John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007, HR 5122, need to be repealed immediately. See Ted Rall column at Yahoo.com “Our Long National Nightmare Has Just Begun.”
EPU’d but OT I think…
HotFlash @
104
sorry about last comment…do not mean to offend. Too much adrenaline today. I shall calm down now.
Collaboration is doing something together- two or more people or parties- or whatever- can take on a task mutually.
As a part of that task- they often have to “compromise”- that is- modify their own views as to the best way of doing it to allow some of the other party’s views to prevail.
Compromise is not a dirty word in my opinion- it’s the basis for getting on with one another on a daily basis.
Collaboration demands it.
Senator Tester might actually stand up with dear Senator Russ and attempt to repeal unpatriotic acts and military commissions, torture, habeas corpus etc. This would have to wait until Bush is out of office of course.
As an organic farmer he could also fight Monsanto and ADM and demand they stop killing off the diversity of genetics available in plant life / seeds. They are quickly working on corporate domination through ownership of most genetics in the agro business. Eliminating as many others as possible through sterilization at a staggering rate.
So many urgent things to do.
Jed @ 51:
I agree completely. We are already in a constitutional crisis. Now we have the power to reverse the slide into dictatorship. Will the Dems be a part of the solution, or will they ignore the problem?
I’m already reading unattributed admin sources referring to potential upcoming investigations as “witch-hunts.”
twolf1 @ 37
-need to pass terrist surveillance act
No, he needs to learn to use the tools he already has (like FISA). He may not be an actual
idiotmorondimbulb, but he’s got a serious case of lazy brain, which makes it pretty much as bad.And can someone get Reid to look at JoeL’s party affiliation on the ballot, and recognize that he isn’t a Democrat anymore? His seniority went bye-bye with his C4L affiliation.
I guess I will be the old curmugen here — access is the drug they give the outside people. You want access to Pelosi, you must talk nice about her. She of the “you will cease and desist using the word evenhanded” to Howard Dean. She owes Dean an apology. Still waiting. And I want to hear Rahm say Dean’s name without snearing.
I realize that we cannot roll back the Patriot Act in the first 100 days, but we need to hold hearings on it. FULL. BLOWN. HEARINGS. ON T.V.
And every time the pundits on T.V. talk, they say how BAD it would be if the dems investigate Bush. Oh no. Grumble. Grumble.
But I by nature am a compromiser and always see the ‘grey’ area for discussion so I will be happy giving the new Speaker the rest of this year. But I really want Murtha for Majority Leader. Get rid of Hoyer. I suppose Pelosi does not want us to get involved in that struggle.
The Republicans are lucky they had the opportunity to gerrymander the electoral districts, or this would have been a REAL blowout.
With regard to TradMed and its myrmidons, I would like to see CNN’s Suzanne Malveaux smacked down. Yesterday, asking W a question, she “quoted” my Congresswoman as having called the President a liar. Later, Wolfie repeated the “quote” and Congresswoman Pelosi smacked him down, hard: “I never said that, I never called the President a LIAR.” Until I saw the (earlier) W presser, I did not completely understand Pelosi’s vehemence.
TradMed must re-learn its role as “honest broker” — stirring the pot with falsehoods just won’t cut it nowadays.
Does that mean that the Dems aren’t going to aggressively take a look the Administration’s use of pre-war intel?
This is a huge shoe yet to drop, and I think we all yearn for a truth and reconcilliation comission on this.
I know this has probably already been mentioned more than a few times but if Pelosi has a good 2 years (and a lot can happen in 2 years)…. hell if she looks like she can pull it off let’s run her for President. The testosterone is at least 50% of the problem in D.C.
CNN says Allen will say that nothing has changed at his 3PM presser - apparently not conceding. Webb has scheduled his presser for 4:14 PM - all times eastern
No, I think the only thing the WH will do between now and January is shred documents they think Democrats might want to subpoena. All this from Bush is
bullshit“window dressing.” Everything I read this morning (was what rwcole, imm, and others commented yesterday) was how pissed off the GOP is that Bush waited until Wednesday to fire Rumsfeld. Firing Rumsfeld last week probably would have saved Burns and Allen, thus the Senate for the GOP. Bush just really likes saying “*uckyou,” to Republicans, Democrats, the world, […] doesn’t seem to matter to him.@41&44..Shumer’s behavior is described with one word..AIPAC..by exit polls, I think I read that 90% of Jewish Americans voted for Dems. Are they weak on Israel..I think not.
Maybe the Rose Garden pissy presser was to keep BigTime quiet — perhaps W has Cheney’s resignation in his pocket and carries it around, never knowing when he might whip it out and accept it. Just keeping the auto-pacemaker in tune, don’tcha know?
Hayduke @ 63
YES - and much more than 50% of the time.
ebbandflow at 612 — good lord, no. That’s one of the issues that has to be examined. And one of the reasons that I am most grateful for the Webb and Tester wins. Getting Patsy Roberts out of the power chair in the Senate Intel committee and Hoekstra out in the House is a HUGE victory for the intel community as a whole. They have been squeezed between the Administration and the rubber stamp Republicans in Congress for far too long, and blamed for far too many of the Administration’s own errors. This is a time for factual information, not spin, and the intel issue is one that needs a thorough examination.
I very carefully said above that accountability is key — I’m not certain why that isn’t clear. Maybe I’m just too tired, but I thought I was pretty emphatic about that.
Perhaps Allen wants the election officials to check and see that everyone paid their poll tax….
Jed @52 - Link please?
John–I suspect that this is only the beginning of the tsunami of gooper hatred toward Clusterfuck- it’s gaining momentum.
For years congressional goopers have been “suckin it up” taking the arrogance, discourtesy, and incompetence for granted while publicly supporting this shit head. It’s OVER- now those years of resentment are gonna come up like the product of a gag reflex.
TeddySanFran @ 68
From Raw Story/MSNBC: MSNBC: Allen to concede this afternoon
…so who knows? We will have to wait and see.
Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Murtha in January –
President Pelosi by August!!!
great piece, Christy - you hit all the right notes.
TeddySanFran @ 19
It all sounds fine to me. Conversely, these bills need to be sprinkled with reversals of many of Bushco’s odious and ineffective national security policies. They need to know that we do not do travel “permissions” in the U.S., that torture will not be tolerated, that habeas lives, and that the Fourth Amendment is not in that position because it’s more dispensable than the Second. And they need to find it out early.
Watch for the White House CoS to reorganize the Hill Liaison staff right quick, with Karl sidelined. When does the press get a chance to ask Karl a question, anyway? How’s “the math” today, Karl?
punaise at 73 — thanks. Amazing what you can pull out of a very tired brain sometimes. *g*
Investigate
Indict
Impeach
Incarcerate
P J Evans @ 23
I think some of this will have to be piecemeal, and it will have to be piggybacked onto legislation that Bush can’t safely veto (since at this point we can’t guarantee veto-proof majorities in the Senate). But the sooner the Lame Quack learns that we’re dancing to a different tune now, the better.
EvilDrPuma at #75 - YES. I would like to see a statement out of Pelosi and Reid’s offices saying that America does not torture. And commit themselves to speaking out about these terrible policies. That will make Joe 4 Joe to frown. :)
hah! speaking of deposed scumbags, Pombo really owes W a big thanks:
Global Yokel @
60
Can this be undone? There must be a politically neutral way to apportion representation, for instance proportional voting? OK, not a first 100 hours thing, but something to keep in mind. There *will* be other elections (last week I was not so positive about that).
Michael Fletcher, peddling CW, will not take my non-CW question outlining progressive wins, but does take this kind of setup of the CW:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....00943.html
Investigations are the best way to dismantle the unelected GOP puppetmasters. The legislative calendar can start with things like the minimum wage — though Bush’s ‘help for small business’ line yesterday implies that he wants to bundle it with a tax cut or some other measure that allows him to veto or poison any bill — but the oversight calendar has to reflect the lack of work done over the past six years.
I want to hear about the Heritage Foundation interns sent to run Iraq. About the energy bill cartel. The no-bid contracts. Heck, start ‘a new era of looking forward, by ensuring we don’t repeat the mistakes of the past’ by offering amnesty in exchange for testimony, if that’s within their power.
OT Question.
Are there Firedog (Firepups?) T-Shirts?
Might be a good fund raiser.
Since Nate told me I’m a Firepup even if I mostly lurk I want a T-Shirt. :)
Speaking of McNerney, has anyone heard from our very own Defender-of-Wildlife and Halliburton-buster Matt O.?
Hm. Wonder if I can find the time for a little television around 3.
RedJet @ 85
I wore my firedoglake T-shirt on election day! (not sure if they’re still available, it was from the old blogspot era).
jed at 8:37 am, I share your understandable concern about the Military Commissions Act, but it takes 60 U.S. Senators to override a Presidential veto. I think it will be easier to get that after hearings about Intelligence and War Profiteering […]. I don’t in any way mean to dilute how vital overturning the MCA is.
IMHO, the single most important legislation this Congress could pass, would be public financing for all national elections in 08.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 69
Christy, it’s not that we don’t believe *you*…
It appears we have elbowed our way into the position of a rather powerful Lobby! the Bloggers Lobby!! With Christy as our voice, we will be able to heard an accepted as the voice of the people. I like that!!!
Christy Hardin Smith @ 50
I don’t doubt that it won’t be the last time. Bush doesn’t play well with others. He’s only gotten as far as he has because it hasn’t been demanded of him. If the “terr’ist surveillance bill” can be delayed until the next Congress convenes, I think it would be a good initial message to Der Shrubbenfuhrer about the way it’s going to be for his last two years.
In one of the Tester - Burns debates, Burns charged that Tester would weaken the Patriot Act, Tester replied, “I don’t want to weaken it I want to repeal it”
Jon will stand up to the powers that be. The question is will be have to fight both the Administration and the Dem leadership?
Federal standards for federal elections. Fund it if it needs funding. Call it the All Votes Are Equal Act. And look at it while the problems of this election are still fresh in people’s minds.
nanakat ! long time no see!
RedJet @ 84
Me Toooooooooooo!
I worked the polls this election- and learned quite a bit. I was amazed at the “poll watchers” who were there most of the day- checking on who had voted and who hadn’t and running off to ring phones or knock on doors.
The dem “poll watchers” were mostly from unions- still providing the backbone that the dem party depends on to be competitive. Got me to thinking how few candidates really reflect the views, values, and culture of the typical union worker. Glad they stick with us.
egregious @ 86
tee he
Organic George @ 93
I love that!
haven’t read it yet, but he’s always worth a look: