Comments on: Vanity Party Wins in CT http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/vanity-party-wins-in-ct/ Firedoglake weblog Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:28:02 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Kentucky Woman http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/vanity-party-wins-in-ct/#comment-369030 Kentucky Woman Wed, 08 Nov 2006 02:49:36 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/vanity-party-wins-in-ct/#comment-369030 <p><a href="#comment-368991"><em>T- @ 98</em></a></p> <blockquote><p>I’m going with the Woodford Reserve. It’s gonna taste gooooood.</p> <p><a href="#comment-368973"><em>Kentucky Woman @ 90</em></a></p> <blockquote><p>Just watched Yarmuth’s eloquent victory speech. He’ll walk the walk. My heart could burst.</p> <p>DO NOT CONCEDE, NED!! IT IS TOO EARLY!!!</p></blockquote> </blockquote> <p>I’m sipping a zinfandel.quickly. College taught me that bourbon is baaaaaad…</p> <p>Can not eat a bourbon ball to this day….</p> T- @ 98

I’m going with the Woodford Reserve. It’s gonna taste gooooood.

Kentucky Woman @ 90

Just watched Yarmuth’s eloquent victory speech. He’ll walk the walk. My heart could burst.

DO NOT CONCEDE, NED!! IT IS TOO EARLY!!!

I’m sipping a zinfandel.quickly. College taught me that bourbon is baaaaaad…

Can not eat a bourbon ball to this day….

]]> By: SharonW http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/vanity-party-wins-in-ct/#comment-369029 SharonW Wed, 08 Nov 2006 02:49:35 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/vanity-party-wins-in-ct/#comment-369029 <p>This sucks. In CT, they haven’t even come close to reporting on half the precincts.</p> This sucks. In CT, they haven’t even come close to reporting on half the precincts.

]]> By: Caoimhin Laochdha http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/vanity-party-wins-in-ct/#comment-369027 Caoimhin Laochdha Wed, 08 Nov 2006 02:49:22 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/vanity-party-wins-in-ct/#comment-369027 <p>Webb 966,000<br /> Allen 968,000</p> <p>85% reporting</p> Webb 966,000
Allen 968,000

85% reporting

]]> By: T- http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/vanity-party-wins-in-ct/#comment-369026 T- Wed, 08 Nov 2006 02:49:19 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/vanity-party-wins-in-ct/#comment-369026 <p>Tryst coming up on CNN!</p> Tryst coming up on CNN!

]]> By: Kalex http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/vanity-party-wins-in-ct/#comment-369024 Kalex Wed, 08 Nov 2006 02:49:14 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/vanity-party-wins-in-ct/#comment-369024 <p><a href="#comment-368999"><em>John Casper @ 105</em></a></p> <blockquote><p>Can someone help me with this wrt the Senate? Dems have won OH,PA and RI. If we take MT, VAorTN, MD, MO, that’s SEVEN. I think that puts Dems at 52. That really limits Lieberman4Lieberman’s leverage.</p></blockquote> <p>MD wasn’t a pick-up — it was an open seat but was formerly held by Sarbanes, a Democrat.</p> John Casper @ 105

Can someone help me with this wrt the Senate? Dems have won OH,PA and RI. If we take MT, VAorTN, MD, MO, that’s SEVEN. I think that puts Dems at 52. That really limits Lieberman4Lieberman’s leverage.

MD wasn’t a pick-up — it was an open seat but was formerly held by Sarbanes, a Democrat.

]]> By: ccmask http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/vanity-party-wins-in-ct/#comment-369023 ccmask Wed, 08 Nov 2006 02:49:11 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/vanity-party-wins-in-ct/#comment-369023 <p>Why do they concede? Why did John Kerry concede?</p> Why do they concede? Why did John Kerry concede?

]]> By: egregious http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/vanity-party-wins-in-ct/#comment-369022 egregious Wed, 08 Nov 2006 02:49:04 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/vanity-party-wins-in-ct/#comment-369022 <p>Don’t feed. Don’t engage.</p> Don’t feed. Don’t engage.

]]> By: DairyMaid http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/vanity-party-wins-in-ct/#comment-369019 DairyMaid Wed, 08 Nov 2006 02:49:03 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/vanity-party-wins-in-ct/#comment-369019 <p>Woot!<br /> Webb is closing the gap!</p> Woot!
Webb is closing the gap!

]]> By: UptownNYChick http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/vanity-party-wins-in-ct/#comment-369020 UptownNYChick Wed, 08 Nov 2006 02:49:03 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/vanity-party-wins-in-ct/#comment-369020 <p>Jane’s up next on air america</p> Jane’s up next on air america

]]> By: TeddySanFran http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/vanity-party-wins-in-ct/#comment-369021 TeddySanFran Wed, 08 Nov 2006 02:49:03 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/vanity-party-wins-in-ct/#comment-369021 <p>Neither acknowledge nor “Quote” them please, ‘pups.</p> <p>Alert time at hand.</p> Neither acknowledge nor “Quote” them please, ‘pups.

Alert time at hand.

]]>