Comments on: Indiana and Kentucky Early Results http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/indiana-and-kentucky-early-results/ Firedoglake weblog Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:27:12 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: ccmask http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/indiana-and-kentucky-early-results/#comment-368328 ccmask Wed, 08 Nov 2006 01:24:12 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/indiana-and-kentucky-early-results/#comment-368328 <p>INDIANA PREDICTED WIN BY WOLFIE!</p> INDIANA PREDICTED WIN BY WOLFIE!

]]> By: Lynn http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/indiana-and-kentucky-early-results/#comment-368315 Lynn Wed, 08 Nov 2006 01:22:01 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/indiana-and-kentucky-early-results/#comment-368315 <p>Rahm doesn’t pick ‘em all. He had nothing to do with Seals vs. Kirk in Illinois 10th.</p> Rahm doesn’t pick ‘em all. He had nothing to do with Seals vs. Kirk in Illinois 10th.

]]> By: ccmask http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/indiana-and-kentucky-early-results/#comment-368304 ccmask Wed, 08 Nov 2006 01:19:53 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/indiana-and-kentucky-early-results/#comment-368304 <p>FL-SEN Nelson: 57% Harris: 41% –18% REPORTING</p> FL-SEN Nelson: 57% Harris: 41% –18% REPORTING

]]> By: Cujo359 http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/indiana-and-kentucky-early-results/#comment-368302 Cujo359 Wed, 08 Nov 2006 01:19:30 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/indiana-and-kentucky-early-results/#comment-368302 <p>G F Allen Republican 447,378 50.43%<br /> J H Webb Jr Democratic 428,815 48.34%<br /> G G Parker Independent Green 9,959 1.12%<br /> Write Ins 924 0.10%</p> <p>with 40.81 % of precincts reporting</p> G F Allen Republican 447,378 50.43%
J H Webb Jr Democratic 428,815 48.34%
G G Parker Independent Green 9,959 1.12%
Write Ins 924 0.10%

with 40.81 % of precincts reporting

]]> By: Muzzy http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/indiana-and-kentucky-early-results/#comment-368299 Muzzy Wed, 08 Nov 2006 01:19:09 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/indiana-and-kentucky-early-results/#comment-368299 <p>Yes kudos to the site for humming along - albeit without editing. </p> <p>With deference to his feet, I accidentally referred to TRex en toto as a sauropod instead of a theropod. </p> <p>How about Titanosaur ?</p> Yes kudos to the site for humming along – albeit without editing.

With deference to his feet, I accidentally referred to TRex en toto as a sauropod instead of a theropod.

How about Titanosaur ?

]]> By: Cujo359 http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/indiana-and-kentucky-early-results/#comment-368296 Cujo359 Wed, 08 Nov 2006 01:18:17 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/indiana-and-kentucky-early-results/#comment-368296 <p><a href="http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/ohhhhhhh-my-stomach/">new thread</a>.</p> new thread.

]]> By: Lou Costello http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/indiana-and-kentucky-early-results/#comment-368292 Lou Costello Wed, 08 Nov 2006 01:17:50 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/indiana-and-kentucky-early-results/#comment-368292 <p><a href="#comment-368239"><em>Lou Costello @ 110</em></a></p> <blockquote><p>Current update every 45 seconds: <a href="http://blueherald.com/">http://blueherald.com/</a><br /> * not sure where the numbers come from.</p></blockquote> <p>Hey NATE, this is what I’m see at Blue Herald:<br /> Virginia<br /> (i) Allen (R) 353,830 50%<br /> Webb (D) 353,128 49%<br /> 32% of precincts reporting</p> <p>Virginia<br /> (i) Allen (R) 267,421 49%<br /> Webb (D) 271,093 50%<br /> 24% precincts reporting</p> Lou Costello @ 110

Current update every 45 seconds: http://blueherald.com/
* not sure where the numbers come from.

Hey NATE, this is what I’m see at Blue Herald:
Virginia
(i) Allen (R) 353,830 50%
Webb (D) 353,128 49%
32% of precincts reporting

Virginia
(i) Allen (R) 267,421 49%
Webb (D) 271,093 50%
24% precincts reporting

]]> By: RedJet http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/indiana-and-kentucky-early-results/#comment-368290 RedJet Wed, 08 Nov 2006 01:17:40 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/indiana-and-kentucky-early-results/#comment-368290 <p>Ford ahead of Corker?<br /> TN-SEN Ford: 54% Corker: 45% n/a n/a 0% 08:14 pm EST </p> <p>But that is with 0% reporting. Huh?</p> Ford ahead of Corker?
TN-SEN Ford: 54% Corker: 45% n/a n/a 0% 08:14 pm EST

But that is with 0% reporting. Huh?

]]> By: Oklahoma kiddo http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/indiana-and-kentucky-early-results/#comment-368285 Oklahoma kiddo Wed, 08 Nov 2006 01:15:27 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/indiana-and-kentucky-early-results/#comment-368285 <p>Matthews says the “commuters” are going Demo tonight.</p> Matthews says the “commuters” are going Demo tonight.

]]> By: TRex http://firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/indiana-and-kentucky-early-results/#comment-368284 TRex Wed, 08 Nov 2006 01:15:20 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/11/07/indiana-and-kentucky-early-results/#comment-368284 <p>New, semi-catty thread. Get it while it’s hot.</p> New, semi-catty thread. Get it while it’s hot.

]]>