Comments on: NYT Endorses Lamont

By: J. Houdek

J. Houdek — Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:39:40 +0000

Too bad Lamont is going to lose, a fact I never see published on this lame blog.

You claim to be in touch with reality, but in reality you are wasting time on a LOSER.

By: MS

MS — Sun, 29 Oct 2006 23:39:25 +0000

so how does joe maintain such high ratings, with all thus?

thanks to all who are working their asses off to get this ass (joe) off the national radar

By: Don’t Go Into The Light

Don’t Go Into The Light — Sun, 29 Oct 2006 21:21:23 +0000

NYT endorses “Not Lieberman”

The NYT today wrote an endorsement of Ned Lamont that strangely mentions almost nothing about Ned Lamont. For the NYT, it all boils down to one thing: He and Mr. Bush are still on the very same page, encouraging the…

By: mui

mui — Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:28:18 +0000

But instead of re-evaluating his own positions, Mr. Lieberman blamed his constituents for failing to notice that he had offered some negative comments about the conduct of the war .. .

“Blame” is a nice soft word here. Harranging us is more like it though.
Blue troops, please come to CT. I just caught a glimpse of an ugly headline: Bloomberg sends troops to CT or something like that. Do not let us CT dems be balkinized, please!

By: bboop

bboop — Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:08:35 +0000

What’s with the Tribune Co.? While the NYTimes endorses Rell for Gov. and Lamont for Senate, it’s sister newspaper, the Hartford Courant does a reverse of tactics here in CT with endorsements of Destefano and Lieberman:
http://www.courant.com/news/op.....editorials .

By: Sue

Sue — Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:19:54 +0000

#71 - TheotherWA - CTBob has a mirror site to Joe’s where you can leave comments

http://joe2006blog.blogspot.com/

By: deandra

deandra — Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:11:04 +0000

There oughta be a law. An election law. You get fired from your job on Friday, do you show up at work on Monday saying you don’t accept the decision?

That’s what Lieberman did.

And no laws exist to stop this conduct.

By: bushbehindbars

bushbehindbars — Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:12:13 +0000

Does Conn. use diebold machines? For some reason, I feel that something’s not quite right w/ the poll #’s. Lamont should (in my opinion) be way ahead of that odious toad LIEberman. Perhaps the outcome is already a done deal?

By: Ron Russell

Ron Russell — Sun, 29 Oct 2006 05:11:22 +0000

Sharoney @
48

Speaking of newspapers, check this out before it disappears:

AP STATE WIRE
10-26-06 13:25,,
October 28, 2006
Associated Press

TEST BULLETIN — The following is a TEST. Joe Lieberman, CTL, elected U.S. Senate, Connecticut.

Yea, I see it too! WTF?

By: captain outrageous

captain outrageous — Sun, 29 Oct 2006 05:03:45 +0000

That Lamont endorsement is a game-changer.

Lamont is now right back in that race. Gotta go, I’m off to give Ned another $100…