
Illustration by Robert Grossman.
____________________
BREAKING: Denny Hastert (R-IL) testifying before the House Ethics Committee regarding the Foley Sex Scandal, according to MSNBC, which had some lovely footage of Hastert entering the House today. More as we get it...
____________________
Matt Taibbi has a new article in Rolling Stone that is well worth a read. Here's a taste:
There is very little that sums up the record of the U.S. Congress in the Bush years better than a half-mad boy-addict put in charge of a federal commission on child exploitation. After all, if a hairy-necked, raincoat-clad freak like Rep. Mark Foley can get himself named co-chairman of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children, one can only wonder: What the hell else is going on in the corridors of Capitol Hill these days?These past six years were more than just the most shameful, corrupt and incompetent period in the history of the American legislative branch. These were the years when the U.S. parliament became a historical punch line, a political obscenity on par with the court of Nero or Caligula -- a stable of thieves and perverts who committed crimes rolling out of bed in the morning and did their very best to turn the mighty American empire into a debt-laden, despotic backwater, a Burkina Faso with cable.
To be sure, Congress has always been a kind of muddy ideological cemetery, a place where good ideas go to die in a maelstrom of bureaucratic hedging and rank favor-trading. Its whole history is one long love letter to sleaze, idiocy and pigheaded, glacial conservatism. That Congress exists mainly to misspend our money and snore its way through even the direst political crises is something we Americans understand instinctively. "There is no native criminal class except Congress," Mark Twain said -- a joke that still provokes a laugh of recognition a hundred years later.
But the 109th Congress is no mild departure from the norm, no slight deviation in an already-underwhelming history. No, this is nothing less than a historic shift in how our democracy is run. The Republicans who control this Congress are revolutionaries, and they have brought their revolutionary vision for the House and Senate quite unpleasantly to fruition. In the past six years they have castrated the political minority, abdicated their oversight responsibilities mandated by the Constitution, enacted a conscious policy of massive borrowing and unrestrained spending, and installed a host of semipermanent mechanisms for transferring legislative power to commercial interests. They aimed far lower than any other Congress has ever aimed, and they nailed their target.
"The 109th Congress is so bad that it makes you wonder if democracy is a failed experiment," says Jonathan Turley, a noted constitutional scholar and the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington Law School. "I think that if the Framers went to Capitol Hill today, it would shake their confidence in the system they created. Congress has become an exercise of raw power with no principles -- and in that environment corruption has flourished. The Republicans in Congress decided from the outset that their future would be inextricably tied to George Bush and his policies. It has become this sad session of members sitting down and drinking Kool-Aid delivered by Karl Rove. Congress became a mere extension of the White House."
The end result is a Congress that has hijacked the national treasury, frantically ceded power to the executive, and sold off the federal government in a private auction. It all happened before our very eyes....
Yowza. Coming soon, to a newstand or a mailbox or a music lover near you...a snarky smackdown of the Republicans who are in charge of, and ruining, the nation and the rule of law. Taibbi's subtitle is: "How our national legislature has become a stable of thieves and perverts -- in five easy steps." Read and discuss -- because I am very interested in your thoughts on this one.
And by the way, in case anyone was wondering, the Republican Party is in charge of the White House and the Congress -- both the House and the Senate. Had enough? Vote for Democrats.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
HEY!
May have to buy this one.
Now They’re Upset
Break your heart, kill your soul, extinguish your thought story on GITMO. Now that there’s amnesty for war crimes in place, they’ve decided to let some people talk.
If this doesn’t result in a major change in government, I truly fear for our future.
Give Melissa Hart the boot!
I know this is o.t. but is wellworth the time to watch.Olberman blisters Bush and the G.O.P like nothing I’ve ever seen. http://www.alternet.org/bloggers/evan/43395
It’s enough to make you cry,14 days to go.
Caligula was a petty scoundrel compared to these profligate GOPedophiles.
Worst. Congress. Ever. goes right along with the Worst. President. Ever. Can voter fraud be prevented this time around? Even Republicans can’t want this to continue. They have to live here too and most of them are not getting rich from this.
Thanks Christy !
up until Taibi’s Abramoff article, hadn’t purchased an RS in almost 30 years - have sinced purchased 4 and wrote Jann Wenner to tell him to keep it up
muzzy - if you’re still here
freeway blogging has become soooo viral, they’re now doing it in Waco, the Chimp’s backyard
http://www.leftyblogs.com/cgi-.....-live.html
the mothership:
http://www.freewayblogger.com/
John Dean had a great comment about this when he was at the lake. IIRC, he said, “Congress had lost it’s institutional pride.”
EPU’d
I think there are quite a few 2nd and 3rd tier House seats in play that aren’t on anyones radar. Here’s one and I’m sure there are others.
Tessa Hafen
http://www.pollster.com/house.php#NV-02
Mehlman now telling Russert on MSNBC that he doesn’t have authority to take down the racist ad running against Ford.
Corker said he doesn’t have the authority to take it down.
Let’s see–corrupt Republicans can’t even control their own racist advertisers. “Nothing I can do about it. Independent expenditure.”
Give me an effin’ break!
I’ll be watching the mailbox for punaise jr.’s copy…time for a little family reading session.
Hard to make out on the cover image, but go to the news stand to see Rep. Foley chasing a page around the Capitol Dome.
Balrog @
2
Better move fast - the campaign donors already got most of ‘em.
“Throw the bums out! Elect new bums!”
Is an old standard. Thanks to Act Blue, we’re going to do better than that!
Prairie - we were watching as well
- had a five spot on “overzealous, unauthorized staffer”
EPU’d:
fahrender @ 92
I have tremendous respect for what Howie and the ladies (and gents) here at FDL are doing with BlueAmerica and have donated there. But they are not adding any of the newly competitive races like this one:
Cozumel @ 11
…and the Dem in WY who is giving Cubin fits. There are many more examples of normally red districts that could be won with a little money to get the message out. It could be the difference between a bare majority and a real working majority.
Hastert OUT.
Laesch IN.
See, wasn’t that easy? IF we Get Out The Vote.
MAKE IT HAPPEN.
Hmmm. I’m a bit surprised about the Hastert thing. I think Palmer must have gotten one hell of a beating yesterday, and Hastert had to go in sooner than he was expecting to.
Prairie Sunshine @ 12
That Fancy Ford site is still up too.
http://www.fancyford.com/
Paid for by the National Republican Senatorial Committee
Mary @ 3
I’ve always felt that amnesty before the House changed hands was the only reason BushCO pushed the military interrogation bill through.
They tried to position it as a midterm issue the GOP could run on, but Mehlman saying “the Democrats don’t want to interrogate terrorists…” simply doesn’t pass the laugh test.
Gonzo, addington, Woo, Cheney, and the rest of them are cowards, pure and simple.
John Dean said* “Congress has lots its institutional pride”.
*Here at fdl in response to my question. My comment was around #90 and his response was near the bottom of that first day’s thread.
DNC’s response to Fancy Ford
http://www.veryfancyfrist.com/
Looks like Howie, Rickie, Kenny and I are cooking up a surprise for Joementum. More when it’s confirmed.
All I can say is: BWAHAHAHAHA.
tommy yum @ 25
Sounds good, Tommy. I can hardly wait!
tommy yum @ 25
Need any contributions? I would be happy to drop a hundred on this specific project if possible. Let me know where to donate? Thanks.
tommy yum @ 25
how long are we required to hold our breath?
tommy yum @ 25
Anything that can make you laugh is good with me.
For 729 days of every two years, Republicans and their lobbyist cronies control our democracy.
But on November 7, we have one day to speak out loud and strong and repudiate the status quo.
No more running the White House as a personal dictatorship rewarding cronies and donors over experienced and qualified military and diplomats.
No more running the U.S. Congress as a rubber stamp for a reckless, out of control neocon administration.
No more letting corrupt and cynical Republican campaign committees scare voters and appeal to the lowest racist and bigoted fears.
No more personal enrichment and power playing by self-aggrandizing Senators.
No more Lieberman. No more Michael Steele hiding his Republican party membership. No more Macaca. No more sleazy blondes. No more hiding behind “independent expenditures.”
November 7 is the accountability moment. And this is the day Americans must look themselves in the mirror and say, “I was accountable. I voted Democratic.”
For a change. For no more reckless wars and betrayal of our troops with lies and lack of armor. No more Americans crying out for help and floating dead in the streets of one of America’s greatest cities. No more government by smear and fear.
We can make change. We can take charge. One day. November 7. Get out our vote.
OT - ctbob’s got some new debate video up.
Interesting map!
http://www.pollster.com/senate.php
Matalin defending the indefensible. I’m the prettier half… That’s wrong, too.
This woman is the lowest of the low…the calloused scab on the bottom of the Rethuglicans’ sh*tty feet.
here’s something to make us all laugh . . .
an actual comment to a Tennessean story about Ford & Corker’s high profile endorsers
somewhere, some poor comedy writer is filing for unemployment
Danny will have to fire himself…
The Libby Defense won’t wash…
The Ethics Committee needs a presser to update
their investigation…
Jack
Interesting that teevee is changing the subject in many cases from the election we are having NOW to 2008 (let’s talk about Obama).
Guess they’ve run out of anything interesting to say about the gooper’s impending demise?
*xyz @ 27
Give it to Ned. I know he’ll put it to good use. *chuckle*
I read this before, so the one word that leapt out at me was:
* Parliament ? ? *
When the admirable Tiberius upon becoming emperor, received a message from the Senate in which the conscript fathers assured him that whatever legislation he wanted would be automatically passed by them, he sent back word that this was outrageous. “Suppose the emperor is ill or mad or incompetent?” He returned their message. They sent it again. His response: “How eager you are to be slaves.”
– Edward Gibbon, History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire
From a Wesley Clark e-mail to contributors:
After noting this may be a once in a lifetime election, he says:
The problem is that the DSCC may forward our contributions to several of those listed, but they’re not likely to send a dime to Lamont. Stick with ActBlue/America.
cbl @ 34
I don’t know TN, but apparently there’s a bit of a cultural divide between Nashville and Memphis. excerpt of “Memphis in the Meantime” by John Hiatt:
Wow to Rolling Stone. And Froomkin is lit up today in a must read. Among his best hits is that of Richard Holbrooke’s open letter in the Post to the prez which includes “…and try to limit future damage in the region and the world.”
Froomkin also mentions Bush googling maps to look at Crawford where he longs to be at times. Bush says he’s googling Crawford; I say it’s Paraguay.
tommy yum @ 37
Is your chuckle implying that he wouldn’t put it to good use? I am probably missing something here…
Regardless, I will certainly continue to give money and sweat equity to the Lamont campaign right up to election day.
Good luck with your project; hope it turns out great!!!
Jesus HQ Christ… the only dem on MSNBC’s pundit parade is Bob Shrum (paired with Ol’ 60 grit).. after uninterruped Mehlman and Matalin?
This is election coverage? If the dems take charge and don’t immediately replace the fairness doctrine with something tamperproof 2008 isn’t going to be close.
tommy yum @ 37
selise @ 31
Did you catch the part after the debate, when Joe goes over to Ned all angry-like and tells him “I shot a man in Reno, just to watch him die.”?
*xyz @ 43
I didn’t mean it that way! Keep up the good work.
msnbc.com:
45% of americans support making cigarettes illegal according to Zogby– fascists of all stripes in this country.
Patrick 4/4 @ 46
“the Ring of Liar, the Ring of Liar”
(time for Joe to Cash in his chips - oh, wait, that would be Schlesinger….)
Anyone have good compilation of FEC data? Or where to get multiple campaign expenditure disclosures in spreadsheet form? I think I might be able to help put the hurt on Joe given a decent data set…
I’d agree that there is no evidence of a dem tidal wave- but there a rising tide. Every week when Cook updates the house charts- 5 or ten more house races have moved in the dem direction- and none in the gooper direction.
Ol’ 60 Grit in Hot Pink…
and a new, perky “bob”.
A tidal wave, or more properly, a tsunami, is often less than a meter high…
…until it hits shore
punaise @ 50
Hello. I’m Petty Cash.
Primordial Ooze @ 53
I like that image
Sparcatus
http://www.opensecrets.org/
some shiny new tracking tools:
http://www.opensecrets.org/pre......10.10.asp
punaise @ 48
When we finally have some House committees investigating Halliburton and Blackwater contracting abuses, we’ll get the tidal wave.
Personally, I want accountability. And by that, I mean indictments.
John Dean at 293, FDL Book Salon Week 2 answers my question, saying “Congress has lost its institutional pride.”
At 95: “My question, you said at the Senate Judiciary hearings that unlike with President Nixon, President Bush’s desire for ever-increasing power is not meeting any resistance from the Congress. Do you see any change, any Congressional pushback, since the hearings?”
[John Dean:]
Almost too slight to measure. Congressman Chris Shays, who is fighting for his political life, is going to hold hearings re Iraq that could push slightly. Otherwise, Congress has lost its institutional pride.”
My original comment, #95
Hello. I’m Petty Cash.
and this is my wife Kitty.
sparcatus: you can get it in PDF from the FEC (and type it yourself. Not too bad if you leave out the street addresses). Otherwise there’s OpenSecrets.org .
If you find out how big the PDF is, in bytes, for Joe’s October quarterly report, I’d like to know. I’ve done the ‘48-hour’ reports for the last couple of weeks before the primary.
pj dot evans at usa dot net
End the GOP Reign of Error.
Bumper sticker I made for my car.
_
My Dean point here is, a Watergate insider TOLD Congress this is worse than Watergate because Congress never says no to the President.
And they still aren’t saying no.
ifthethunderdontgetya @ 58
Remember Grover Norquist’s line about making government so small you could drown it in a bathtub?
This is apparently a government of men, not laws - and they are very, very small.
punaise @ 60
Petty Kitty?
Sure. It’s had all its shots.
I notice the MSM has never broached the meme of how the Republican Party was supposed to be the “permanant Republican majority” after implementing the K St. project and using all of the power and money they had accumulated as the unfettered ruling party.
How come we never hear about Bush’s “scandal plagued” administration?
-GSD
Prairie Sunshine @
33
More like a pus leaking scab on their behind!
Why don’t we hear that the Republicans have lost 4, FOUR congressmen due to arrests, convictions, and indictments? Over and over and over again?
I mean Christ, we hear about Gerry Studds transgressions from 33 years ago..over and over again.
-GSD
Primordial Ooze @ 54
That’s exactly why (most of) the MSM is missing it…
SB_Gypsy @ 67
Please stop insulting pus leaking scabs with such unkind comparisons.
-GSD
You can’t blame the scab for something that’s clearly the doing of the pus.
rwcole @ 71
You leak with the pus you have, not with pus you wish…um…I mean…ick.
Hastert arrives at ethics committee in Foley probe
FWIW, Reynolds’
sounds to me as though he is trying to send a message to Hastert and some other Republicans. I suspect Reynolds knows that other Republicans will substantially support his version against Hastert.
OT, and perhaps more relevant. Reynolds passed on evidence of sexual harrassment. Foley was a supervisor to the pages, Hastert was Foley’s supervisor. I suspect Federal law required Reynolds to document his concerns and date the documentation.
RW at 71 — okay, I have to say…that tops the image of Mark Foley’s hairy neck in a trench coat chasing pages around the capitol in ick factor. Ewwwwww. *g*
Olbermann yesterday ran off string of at least 9 video clips of Bush petulantly asserting that we/he would “stay the course.”
I hope the total idiocy of Bush’s latest remark, and Snow’s lame evasive parsings, gets through to mainstream voters.
_
Chuck Schumer on MSNBC right now “we need to stop policing a civil war in Iraq” — great frame!
cbl @ 57
Thanks. Definitely good resources. Unfortunately, I’m looking for data on where the money was spent. Not where it came from or to whom it was donated or regifted PAC to PAC. Rather what the money was spent on…commercials, Little Miss Petty Cash, etc…
Compare the current U.S. Constitutional system to the British Mother of Parliaments. The essential body in any democracy is the Parliament. The Executive must always be responsible to the Parliament, or the Executive with a source of legitimacy outside the Parliament will take control of the Parliament, eliminating effective democracy.
In a Presidential system, this seems to be a result of party control of both the parliament and the executive at the same time.
I am not a historian of the British Parliament, but I would bet that there were many times that the executive (the King/Queen) dominated Parliament much as the current American President is doing Congress. The only protection from that was for the Parliament majority to take control of the Executive, and place the two sets of powers into the same hands. That is the Prime Minister. This results in all power and legitimacy being placed with a single individual who, at the ame time, takes all responsibility.
Our Presidential system attempts to place the sources of power into different hands in the Presidential and Congressional branches, with Congress demanding accountability from the executive. But the party system is a way of going outside the government and having the same people actually control and direct those in the Executive and Congressional branches. It’s only effective when the same party controls both branches, and when there is an effective parliamentary control by one party in each house of Congress. This latter became possible when Newt Gingrich eliminated Seniority as the only route to power as House Chairmen.
In short, it seems to me that the U.S. Constitution and its Presidential system only works as long as effective power is diffused and spread out to a number of people with independent sources of legitimacy and incumbency in the two branches.
Three things that previously prevented a single party from gaining the power the Republicans have in the past were seniority as the route to committee chairmanship (eliminated by Gingrich) and the need for each Senator and Congressman to get elected on his/her own from their own state or district (eliminated by DeLay’s K-Street Project.) The third was the tradition of the independence of the institution of the Congress from the Executive Branch. This was eliminated when the Republican Party took control of all three branches.
A possible fourth element has been the geographical dispersion of the American electorate, but this has been politically eliminated by the spread of the Mass media, in the form of TV advertising and the national consolidation of the media into a few relatively easily controllable corporations.
This probably isn’t all of it, but I think that we have been witnessing the failure of the U.S. Constitutional system of checks and balances. The problem here needs to be somehow fixed by a patch of some sort. It has been an amazingly good system for over two centuries, so it should not be replaced. - Just patched to prevent future takeovers of the current kind.
via TomPaine.com
What Women Want
Martha Burk
Martha Burk is a political psychologist and director of the Corporate Accountability Project for the National Council of Women’s Organizations.
o/t
God Bless Michael J Fox -
http://www.bencardin.com/multimedia/video102306
as we get closer to election day, i grow more disheartened by the poll numbers, my gut tells me americans will return most of the rethugs to congress b/c they’re still scared silly by repeated mentions of “terrorist attacks are imminent” and only rethugs can protect us. and americans seem to buy this shit. also most people lie to pollsters - if not dems would’ve taken congress back in the ‘04 elections! and now we have electronic machines to deal with and we all know what this means come election day. i am very very pessimistic. god help the USA!!!
Pretty funny that the goopers have been unable to get the Foley story off the front pages for weeks. What do they do? Schedule an “investigation” that are a daily reporting beat. Did they WANT this thing to dominate the news- or are they just plain incompetent?
P J evans @ 61
The report you have selected has 1882 pages. The size of the file will be approximately 65870kB
I’m still on page two, but something that struck me about the stories of the arbitrary behavior of Sensebrenner and Bill Thomas is that I don’t recall either being in danger of losing his seat this year. Gerrymandered districts are one cause of this behavior, I think, because it makes it less likelty that such people will be held accountable for their actions.
Something to think about if and when Democrats regain control of the government. Gerrymandering has to be brought under control, or in a few years we may see Democrats behaving the same way.
I haven’t had to time to read today’s comments so I don’t know if this has been posted- but this is a great op-ed in the Courant from a minister and a rabbi:
http://www.courant.com/news/op.....lines-oped
~~In our various communities of faith we most often think about the soul in singular terms, residing within each one of us and beloved of God. But what about the idea that a nation, too, might have a soul, the place from which our basic decency arises? []
But our government has done all of these things in our names. On Oct. 17, President Bush signed the Military Commissions Act, which was rushed through Congress just in time for the campaign season. By undermining the moral values and legal traditions on which America was founded, this shameful law threatens the soul of our nation.
Three Connecticut Representatives and one of our Senators voted for this law: Chris Shays, Nancy Johnson, Rob Simmons and Joe Lieberman. The new law will allow torture to continue to be carried out in our names. When challenged, these legislators argue that the law explicitly forbids the practice of torture. And indeed, there is language in the law that provides this political cover. But taken in its entirety, the Military Commissions Act allows prisoner abuse to continue. It grants impunity to the civilians who authorized, tolerated and perpetrated torture since 9/11, and makes it much less likely that future torturers will be held accountable for their actions.[]
The law is riddled with loopholes, three of which are particularly glaring. First [] second [] third
`~~~ each point has a short and very cogent paragraph here- really good info for “talking points” - i.e. trying speak rationally about why this is so wrong, as opposed to just sputtering or going up in flames in a conversation (been known to do that)…
The official Lamont blog has the text of a great speech on Iraq that Lamont is giving right now in Hartford. Lamont is tying Lieberman to Nixon perfectly. Hope to see that Lieberman/Nixon commercial on TV soon. Here is the excerpt from Lamont’s speech:
————————
Ned’s Iraq Speech
(Ned is delivering a major speech on Iraq this afternoon in Hartford. There are some excepts below, and you can read the full text here. – Tim)
I got into this race not because we were asking too many questions, but because politicians were asking too few.
Instead of asking the tough questions, Senator Lieberman rubberstamped the President’s rush to war.
Instead of demanding real answers, Senator Lieberman repeated presidential platitudes, and even echoed Don Rumsfeld by dismissing dissent and shunning members of his own party who sought a change of course.
Iraq is the defining issue of our time. How we deal with Iraq will define who we are as a people, where we go as a nation, and what we want for our future.
Not just for now, but for years and years to come.
————
He thinks that glossy ads and election-eve Nixonian declarations of “wanting to end the war” will convince the people of Connecticut that he doesn’t share any responsibility for the disaster in Iraq or bear any real responsibility to get us out. In Joe’s world, he’s been a casual observer in Washington for all these years.
But his record tells us otherwise. Connecticut must hold him accountable – not just for what he’s done in the past, but what he’s incapable of in the future. Joe Lieberman has been part of the problem in Washington, he’s incapable of being part of the solution. And that is what this election is really all about.
Similarly, Senator Lieberman has said recently he now “wants to bring the troops home,” but continues to fail to offer a concrete plan for change and repeat White House talking points against those that do.
Thirty five years ago, we heard exactly this kind of rhetoric. We heard the very leaders that pushed us to war in Vietnam tell us that they really did want to bring our troops home. They said that if we just gave them more time, they would come up with a plan to get us out of the war they got us into. It was Richard Nixon, for instance, who told the country in 1969 “I want to end the war” and then pressed forward with Vietnam for another three years, at a cost of 9,000 more American lives.
Senator Lieberman saying now, two weeks before an election, he suddenly wants to end the war is as credible as Richard Nixon was almost 40 years ago.
http://nedlamont.com/blog
rwcole @
36
More likely they’re scared Dems will take over Congress in a big way, so they’re trotting out a powerful black man to scare the racists into voting for Repubs this year. It’s a get-out-the-vote program run by your friendly unbiased news media. Lovely, eh?
Chris Jansing is on again just totally dismissing any chance for Ned.
Glenn Greenwald has another spot-on post that partly explains why this all happened. He sites familar/influential rightwing pundits who, all evidence to the contrary, simply deny reality:
See Update II to this Greenwald link
And if you haven’t Spotlighted at least one Greenwald post to your favorite local/national media today, then please do it.
Use this link: Link to Spotlight
…then come back and spotlight all three of Christy’s posts today. These are worth $1000 in contributions, every time.
“No single senator can stop the war in Iraq but they can impact my pocketbook!”
Then, this paragraph appeared in page two:
The sentence in bold might be a key to understanding why Congress hasn’t been asserting its traditional role of warmaking and legislating. Bush has usurped both. A Congress that saw itself as congressmen first, party members second would, I think, have acted in its own interests as the framers of the Constitution imagined. Instead, the Republicans have enthusiastically supported these power grabs, and the Democrats have, for the most part, meekly demurred.
Attack ads are “Washington as usual” behavior. Something that the Democrats ought to beat the drum on.
After this gutter-ball campaign the MSM and the Republicans are going to be calling for an end to “partisanship”.
Negative attacks can also work against the attacker as it appears has happened in Massachusetts.
Democrat Deval Patrick leads by 27%.
First Patrick dropped in the polls…but after heavy attack rotation people began to see (R) Kerry Muffy Healey as a vindictive, bitter and mean spirited campaigner. Not to mention the subtext of racism in her “soft on crime” attacks on Patrick.
Maybe the Romney’s Mormon Army can help her dig out?
-GSD
Spartacus
take a peek
http://www.sunlightfoundation.com/
left hand margins has something labeled
On Line Research
Tutorials
fyi, Fri 10/20 was deadline for 2nd to last filing prior to election
Sparcatus @ 77
Spartacus,
I suppose you’ve been to the FEC Query page. I don’t think it has the detail you’re looking for and it appears to be a bear to navigate.
Off Topic rant: TOTN is doing a series “Rethinking Iraq.” Today’s rethinker is, wait for it… Richard Pearl. That’s right a man who has been wrong about everything in his public life, except for how to make money pimping US foreign policy, has a forum on Nice Polite Republicans on rethinking the illegal war he helped to sell.
Shameful and shameless!
Speaking of Worst Congress ever…as it relates to campaign finance and disclosure. Apparently, Senators all file their disclosure reports or at least much of it on paper…as is the case with Joe’s October filing. All paper, all scanned. Though you’ll note that it is all prepared digitally…
Folks more attuned than I long ago noted this:
http://www.cfinst.org/pr/102303.html
So, the analysis I wanted to do is going to be much harder than I’d thought…
Mr. “Campaign Finance Reform” Lieberman is blowing smoke on a whole new level.
Try out the flash game I just finished:
Slap Dennis Haster and Hapeas Corpus.
Slap Dennis Hastert Flash Game: when you guys have time. Take care.
Yeah- let’s re-think Iraq into a peaceful and prosperous model of eastern civilization.
We’ve got too many people around who buy into Clusterfuck’s idea that if ya think somethin long enough- it will be true.