<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FDL Book Salon: Anntichrist, Superstar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/22/fdl-book-salon-anntichist-superstar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/22/fdl-book-salon-anntichist-superstar/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:52:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dejah</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/22/fdl-book-salon-anntichist-superstar/#comment-348629</link>
		<dc:creator>dejah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 01:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/22/fdl-book-salon-anntichist-superstar/#comment-348629</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;or “GOp cundit”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or “GOp cundit”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cadmium</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/22/fdl-book-salon-anntichist-superstar/#comment-346776</link>
		<dc:creator>cadmium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 23:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/22/fdl-book-salon-anntichist-superstar/#comment-346776</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-345343&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Jane Hamsher @&lt;br /&gt;
                77              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;TRex says:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;We can’t comprehend, for example, why she always wears the same dress because she’s not wearing it for us.  She’s wearing it for the men who go to strip clubs.  All they see is the naked skin on her thighs and chest.  All they hear is their own pinheaded world view streaming out of her mouth.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I look at pictures of her and I think she is the perfect expression of “GOP pretty.”&lt;br /&gt;
It was Bob Adams who said that “a liberal 2 is a conservative 10 — no wonder they hate us.”  No woman with any self-respect could adopt a world-view in which women are just so many piles of useless garbage, hence the beauty that comes from within just doesn’t.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most self-respecting women like to think that with the right lighting and makeup, and if we’re feeling upbeat and positive and doing something we feel good about, we can hit a liberal “6″ or “7″.  But even when we’re feeling sick and bloated and flu-ridden and catch a glimse of our ashen-skinned selves in the mirror as we reach for the TheraFlu, it’s somewhat comforting to know we’d still be a ‘10′in the eyes of the GOP.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“GOP pretty”  — maybe I should change my name for her.  I always refer to her as “Repuplican pundit Ann Coulter”  It connects the two–even though many would like to run away from her.   “GOP pundit Ann Coulter” has a better ring to it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She shouldn’t be referred to by just her name.  She should always be called “GOP pundit Anne Coulter”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-345343"><em>Jane Hamsher @<br />
                77              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>TRex says:
</p>
<blockquote><p>We can’t comprehend, for example, why she always wears the same dress because she’s not wearing it for us.  She’s wearing it for the men who go to strip clubs.  All they see is the naked skin on her thighs and chest.  All they hear is their own pinheaded world view streaming out of her mouth.</p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p>I look at pictures of her and I think she is the perfect expression of “GOP pretty.”<br />
It was Bob Adams who said that “a liberal 2 is a conservative 10 — no wonder they hate us.”  No woman with any self-respect could adopt a world-view in which women are just so many piles of useless garbage, hence the beauty that comes from within just doesn’t.</p>
<p>Most self-respecting women like to think that with the right lighting and makeup, and if we’re feeling upbeat and positive and doing something we feel good about, we can hit a liberal “6″ or “7″.  But even when we’re feeling sick and bloated and flu-ridden and catch a glimse of our ashen-skinned selves in the mirror as we reach for the TheraFlu, it’s somewhat comforting to know we’d still be a ‘10′in the eyes of the GOP.</p>
<p>“GOP pretty”  — maybe I should change my name for her.  I always refer to her as “Repuplican pundit Ann Coulter”  It connects the two–even though many would like to run away from her.   “GOP pundit Ann Coulter” has a better ring to it.</p>
<p>She shouldn’t be referred to by just her name.  She should always be called “GOP pundit Anne Coulter”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyberCipher</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/22/fdl-book-salon-anntichist-superstar/#comment-346540</link>
		<dc:creator>CyberCipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 21:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/22/fdl-book-salon-anntichist-superstar/#comment-346540</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Coulter is indeed an embarrassment. On the other hand, you should not be surprised by her antics or her over-the-top hyperbole. Extremists on the left have created Ann Coulter. AC is a splendid example of Isaac Newton’s third law of motion, viz. for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. If you don’t believe me, buy a copy of Michelle Malkin’s “Unhinged” book and read it. I am amused by your reaction to AC. You puzzle over her media popularity, her sex appeal, her sanity, etcetera. You just don’t get it. She is NOT stupid. She is making money hand over fist. There’s a very large number of people out there that don’t care what she says, how she says it, or whether anything that she says is true. These people are simply “getting off” on the fact that she consistently gets you to “take the bait.” They love watching her infuriate you to the point where you go into convulsions. People want to see her on TV solely for the entertainment value. IMHO, the whole phenomenon is akin to the popularity of pro-wrestling. It’s the same caliber of people that like to watch that kind of stuff. If you don’t like what she says and how she says it, the worst thing that you could do is write and publish a book about her. She will thrive on the attention. She’s laughing at you right about now.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coulter is indeed an embarrassment. On the other hand, you should not be surprised by her antics or her over-the-top hyperbole. Extremists on the left have created Ann Coulter. AC is a splendid example of Isaac Newton’s third law of motion, viz. for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. If you don’t believe me, buy a copy of Michelle Malkin’s “Unhinged” book and read it. I am amused by your reaction to AC. You puzzle over her media popularity, her sex appeal, her sanity, etcetera. You just don’t get it. She is NOT stupid. She is making money hand over fist. There’s a very large number of people out there that don’t care what she says, how she says it, or whether anything that she says is true. These people are simply “getting off” on the fact that she consistently gets you to “take the bait.” They love watching her infuriate you to the point where you go into convulsions. People want to see her on TV solely for the entertainment value. IMHO, the whole phenomenon is akin to the popularity of pro-wrestling. It’s the same caliber of people that like to watch that kind of stuff. If you don’t like what she says and how she says it, the worst thing that you could do is write and publish a book about her. She will thrive on the attention. She’s laughing at you right about now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackd</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/22/fdl-book-salon-anntichist-superstar/#comment-346406</link>
		<dc:creator>jackd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/22/fdl-book-salon-anntichist-superstar/#comment-346406</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Not that this isn’t a fine entry, but when I saw the post title, I thought we were going to get a guest post from noted &lt;a href=&quot;http://world-o-crap.com/blog/&quot;&gt;World ‘o Crap&lt;/a&gt; commenter and polemicist Anntichrist S. Coulter.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that this isn’t a fine entry, but when I saw the post title, I thought we were going to get a guest post from noted <a href="http://world-o-crap.com/blog/">World ‘o Crap</a> commenter and polemicist Anntichrist S. Coulter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/22/fdl-book-salon-anntichist-superstar/#comment-346366</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/22/fdl-book-salon-anntichist-superstar/#comment-346366</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;“Why?!” any sensible person wonders, “Why is this brownshirt cheerleader even allowed out of the psych ward, much less ceaselessly paraded before the public?  Why, why, WHYYYYY?!  She’s not smart, she’s not funny, and (in spite of what men like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity say) she’s &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; sexy.  She’s got a face like a horse and a figure like a ten-speed bicycle.  Why the hell do people love her so much?”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I keep wondering why any of the leftists even bring this up as a point regarding political debate.  Except that it seems the leftists’ political existence relies solely related to sex, most notably abortion and homosexuality, and everything else (especially national security) takes the proverbial “back seat” (Get it, get it?  Heh, heh, heh, heh, heh!!!).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I read a ton of leftists who absolutely love that old bag Helen Thomas.  She clearly is not what one thinks of as sexy, unless you’re someone who was around when the Great Pyramid of Giza was built.  I believe ol’ Helen reported it while working at the &lt;em&gt;Memphis Egypt Times&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“Why?!” any sensible person wonders, “Why is this brownshirt cheerleader even allowed out of the psych ward, much less ceaselessly paraded before the public?  Why, why, WHYYYYY?!  She’s not smart, she’s not funny, and (in spite of what men like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity say) she’s <em>not</em> sexy.  She’s got a face like a horse and a figure like a ten-speed bicycle.  Why the hell do people love her so much?”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I keep wondering why any of the leftists even bring this up as a point regarding political debate.  Except that it seems the leftists’ political existence relies solely related to sex, most notably abortion and homosexuality, and everything else (especially national security) takes the proverbial “back seat” (Get it, get it?  Heh, heh, heh, heh, heh!!!).</p>
<p>I read a ton of leftists who absolutely love that old bag Helen Thomas.  She clearly is not what one thinks of as sexy, unless you’re someone who was around when the Great Pyramid of Giza was built.  I believe ol’ Helen reported it while working at the <em>Memphis Egypt Times</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dejah</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/22/fdl-book-salon-anntichist-superstar/#comment-346317</link>
		<dc:creator>dejah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 18:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/22/fdl-book-salon-anntichist-superstar/#comment-346317</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;To use a line that Dolly Parton made famous, and applying it to Cunning Stunt Coulter:  it costs a lot to look this cheap!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One wonders what it has cost Coulter, except I, for one, don’t give a shit. She’s cost this country more dignity and respect and honor and should be charged for what she’s done as the treasonous slut she is.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To use a line that Dolly Parton made famous, and applying it to Cunning Stunt Coulter:  it costs a lot to look this cheap!</p>
<p>One wonders what it has cost Coulter, except I, for one, don’t give a shit. She’s cost this country more dignity and respect and honor and should be charged for what she’s done as the treasonous slut she is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/22/fdl-book-salon-anntichist-superstar/#comment-346215</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/22/fdl-book-salon-anntichist-superstar/#comment-346215</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This article is guilty of everything you say Ann is perpetuating.  This is nothing but “snarky” infotainment that perpetuates hatred of others views.  Regardless of Ann’s credibility or not ( I personally agree with her on some things and not on others ) … your post isn’t anything above what you claim she has to offer.  Your message may be different but your approach appears to be everything you claim to hate about her.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rude, stereotypical and baseless.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is guilty of everything you say Ann is perpetuating.  This is nothing but “snarky” infotainment that perpetuates hatred of others views.  Regardless of Ann’s credibility or not ( I personally agree with her on some things and not on others ) … your post isn’t anything above what you claim she has to offer.  Your message may be different but your approach appears to be everything you claim to hate about her.</p>
<p>Rude, stereotypical and baseless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skippy</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/22/fdl-book-salon-anntichist-superstar/#comment-345938</link>
		<dc:creator>Skippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/22/fdl-book-salon-anntichist-superstar/#comment-345938</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been ignoring Coulter for years because I know it’s all an act to sell books and rake in the  big speaking fees. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All she cares about is funding up her Hobe Sound lifestyle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Her goal is to be a Gold Coast social maven and will likely end up marrying some rich, elderly oilman without a prostate and throwing a few parties every year for the crowd down there.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been ignoring Coulter for years because I know it’s all an act to sell books and rake in the  big speaking fees. </p>
<p>All she cares about is funding up her Hobe Sound lifestyle.</p>
<p>Her goal is to be a Gold Coast social maven and will likely end up marrying some rich, elderly oilman without a prostate and throwing a few parties every year for the crowd down there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fahrender</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/22/fdl-book-salon-anntichist-superstar/#comment-345894</link>
		<dc:creator>fahrender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 06:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/22/fdl-book-salon-anntichist-superstar/#comment-345894</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-345341&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;TRex @&lt;br /&gt;
                75              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-345338&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Oklahoma kiddo @ 72&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;After the Democrats take back this nation next month and in 2008, will we hear less, or more from this hottie babe, Coulter, in the future?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Personally, and I say this with caution, I think Coulter may have jumped the shark this last summer when she went after the 9/11 widows.  After that, her book sales halved every week that the book was on the charts.  I think she has alienated all but her most stalwart fans, so we may be seeing the Twilight of Coulter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We live in hope.  And failing that, there’s always the chance she’ll OD and aspirate her own vomit and die.  That notion makes me go all warm and fuzzy inside.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TRex: Sometimes you really go to far. The last paragraph is a case in point. It’s worthy of Ann herself and reflects very poorly on FDL. You do a lot of great stuff. Don’t negate it with viscious snark like the above……&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-345341"><em>TRex @<br />
                75              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-345338"><em>Oklahoma kiddo @ 72</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>After the Democrats take back this nation next month and in 2008, will we hear less, or more from this hottie babe, Coulter, in the future?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Personally, and I say this with caution, I think Coulter may have jumped the shark this last summer when she went after the 9/11 widows.  After that, her book sales halved every week that the book was on the charts.  I think she has alienated all but her most stalwart fans, so we may be seeing the Twilight of Coulter.</p>
<p>We live in hope.  And failing that, there’s always the chance she’ll OD and aspirate her own vomit and die.  That notion makes me go all warm and fuzzy inside.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>TRex: Sometimes you really go to far. The last paragraph is a case in point. It’s worthy of Ann herself and reflects very poorly on FDL. You do a lot of great stuff. Don’t negate it with viscious snark like the above……</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caia</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/22/fdl-book-salon-anntichist-superstar/#comment-345792</link>
		<dc:creator>caia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 05:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/22/fdl-book-salon-anntichist-superstar/#comment-345792</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-345551&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Marion in Savannah @&lt;br /&gt;
                188              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-345509&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Odd.  They work fine for me, using Firefox.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They’re broken links for me as well, in Firefox.  Could those who can see them perhaps C&amp;P key portions for the rest of us?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe the Memory Hole has copies of the expunged news reports.  It’s not that I disbelieve they’d be capable of it, but I don’t know TBR News.  All the other reports on this Google found were just repostings of their report.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-345551"><em>Marion in Savannah @<br />
                188              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-345509"></a><br />
Odd.  They work fine for me, using Firefox.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>They’re broken links for me as well, in Firefox.  Could those who can see them perhaps C&amp;P key portions for the rest of us?</p>
<p>Maybe the Memory Hole has copies of the expunged news reports.  It’s not that I disbelieve they’d be capable of it, but I don’t know TBR News.  All the other reports on this Google found were just repostings of their report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
