http://www.liebermeforme.com

JOE must GO!

Joe’s main line of attack is the “I’m so bi-partisan”, which can also be effective and I wish Ned would hammer the dung out of him on that bullsit.

Maybe something like this:
“Fine Mr Lieberman, but if your bi-partisanship is so effective then why have you failed miserably to do X,Y, or Z?

that’s good, or he could just point out that we are in this mess because of enablers (aka bipartisan senators) and we could use A LOT MORE partisanship (aka oversight).

Well said! Send it to Lamont.com.

Joe Lieberman is a lousy debater. Today’s performance only confirmed what has been apparent since the Cheney fiasco in 2000 and the Iowa embarassments in 2004. The primary reason for this is that the only thing he really believes in is that Joe Lieberman is an indispensable man in the political affairs of our nation. As such, the only thing he has to sell is himself. Talk about having a short and shoddy inventory.

I disagree. Catfish Joe had Ned on the ropes with his innocuation technique at the start of the debate, until Ned and Schlesinger triangulated his narrow ass.

IMO, Ned is going to have to defuse the ” help, help, he’s attacking me, he’s attacking me” defense pretty damn quick as it can be very effective for the low-info voter.

However, a continued strong showing by Schlesinger could provide Ned with a political SODDIT (ask Christy) defense.

Joe’s main line of attack is the “I’m so bi-partisan”, which can also be effective and I wish Ned would hammer the dung out of him on that bullsit.

Maybe something like this:
“Fine Mr Lieberman, but if your bi-partisanship is so effective then why have you failed miserably to do X,Y, or Z?

Finally, Ned needs a couple of laugh lines.

I like, “Joe, you ignorant slut” as a nice start, (and perfectly illustrative of Joe’s moral and intellectual character), but Ned may want to go with something slightly less Gibson-like.

new thread. Apparently, Lieberman 4 Lieberman needs a better candidate.

707!!