
(Oliphant cartoon via MFWblog.)
Let's take a few minutes and discuss loyalty, shall we? The Journal Inquirer has some interesting thoughts on the Connecticut Senate race that are well worth a read.
…It was a remarkable performance for two reasons. First, it showed, again, that Lieberman is possessed of great political skills. During the primary campaign, the senator seemed to have lost those skills. But now he has been freed to be who he really is. He's comfortable and effective again. Second, the person Lieberman really is, is a Bush Republican.
His speech to an enthusiastic crowd of more than 600 left no doubt on either point.
Lieberman will fight hard to keep his seat and he knows how to fight hard.
Second, he will do so as the de-facto Republican candidate in this election – with the support of Republican voters, and, it's a good guess, financial help from GOP donors and organizational help from GOP strategists, from Karl Rove on down.
Lieberman has the right to do all of this, as an independent, petitioning candidate. After all, the Democrats rejected him. But it is important for Democratic voters to know where Good Old Joe really stands this year and who his friends are. And it is important to recall that Lieberman still says he is a Democrat, and that he sought the Democratic nomination.
Usually, when a member of the Democratic Party seeks its nomination and does not get it, he supports the person who did get it….
Last week Lieberman told a Washington, D.C., newspaper that:
- He would also never forget the Democrats, like Chris Dodd, who moved to support Ned Lamont after he won the Democratic Senate nomination.
- If re-elected, Lieberman expects to retain his seniority. Otherwise, he said, he would have to consider not caucusing with the Democrats.
Well, there is only one other group to caucus with – the Senate Republicans.
Connecticut Republicans know what's going on in this election. Their nominal candidate, Alan Schlesinger, has between 3 and 5 percent in the polls. The Republican national chairman has declined to endorse him and Gov. Jodi Rell said he should withdraw from the contest. Republicans know that Joe is their horse in this race.
Democrats who think Lieberman is still one of them need to wake up and smell the coffee. (emphasis mine)
That sound you hear just may be Dan Gerstein's head exploding because a Connecticut journalist dared to say in print what everyone else has been thinking.
The Democratic party leadership and party elders had better wake up to reality and quickly, because de facto Republican Joe isn't just sneaking out behind their backs for a cloture quickie any longer.
The flirtation with Karl Rove and his Republican fundraising machine is out in the open for all to see. For heaven's sakes, Joe Lieberman is now supported by the big money behind the Swift Boat Veterans. And if you think that this is just a meaningless little fling, you can think again — Karl plays for keeps, and the Democratic party "bigwigs" had better be willing to wake up and do the same.
Or they might as well forget about getting the nice washroom keys for the next session of Congress, because Joe and Dick and Karl and George are way too cozy for Lieberman to be siding with the wimpy folks. If ever there were a moment to find your spine for the good of the party and the nation, this is it.
The Senate is looking very, very close — perhaps a 50-50 split — so take a moment and think about this: Is Joe Lieberman the vote on which you want to depend to save a women's right to choose?
To prevent further erosion of the Constitution?
To force some accountability and oversight of George Bush and his Administration on the critical issues of military planning? Torture? War profiteering? Homeland security?
To keep the interests of elderly citizens on medicare ahead of those of pharmaceutical lobbyists?
I mean, honestly, is Joe Lieberman the person you think you can count on, time and time again, to stay steadfast and true – or are you more apt to consider him the Brutus, waiting in the wings to stab the Democratic party in the back to improve his own political fortunes and that of the self-styled wannabe Caesar in shrubby clothing.
As demonstrated by the flagrant turning of his back on the Democratic voters after the primary, and the blatant courting of GOP smear and smarm money during the primary and beyond, Joe Lieberman is loyal to one thing, and one thing only: keeping his butt on the public dole in a political office that allows him to continue his self-important, ego-driven lifestyle. And if Harry Reid and Chuck Schumer and Bill Clinton and all the other Democratic party bigwigs cannot see that then they truly do deserve what they get with Senator Churl and Whine.
But the rest of us here in America deserve a lot better than Turncoat Joe.
A big thank you to Sen. Chris Dodd for campaigning with Ned Lamont this evening. If you are anywhere near Connecticut, please volunteer to help the Lamont campaign this weekend or any time between now and November 7. If you aren't near Connecticut, please volunteer for a Democratic candidate of your choice in your area — because getting out the vote is critical for the next four weeks.
Your nation is depending on you.



78 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Hi again!
MR. LAMONT!!
Now Playing:
Tales From Topographic Oceans
I love this record.
Yes very good for Dodd for acting on behalf of Democrats instead of the IPR (Incumbency Protection Racket).
Can’t believe I fell and twisted my ankle this morning. If TRex had just stood there and let me tazer him instead of running like a little girl none of this would’ve happened.
The online shopping thing must stop, TRex. What do you need pants for, anyway?
I sent that editorial to my brother this morning. I’m going to spam the living shit out of him until I break through his cognitive dissonance.
He doesn’t like Ned, likes Webb and I told him that voting for Joe will neutralize Webb’s vote. Go Ned!
Jane Hamsher @ 3
Oh great, Jane, here goes the feminist thread again…
Jane Hamsher @ 3
To make my tail look smaller.
Digby is EN FUEGO today!
Balrog, had to do some digging on Squire, but now I think I’ll get my Yes on too! In and around the lake…
epu’d–
OT– here’s a YouTube of Charlie Macaca Bass spewing racism against Bernie Sanders…
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2006/10/13 /gop-rep-bass-caught-slam_n_31617.html
surreal how effective these little homegrown videos are.
Lemmessee, the second one to appear today. First Shays, now Bass.
T-Rex, did you have Ned the Fighting Koi with you?
OT – Shorter North Korea:
SYKE!
nj progressive @ 10
I had just dropped him off at karate.
http://www.TurncoatJoe.com
The FDL Martini drinking lamp is lit! Less than a month before the election, so our drink today is:
TOGA, TOGA, TOGA!
Can anyone else smell coffee brewing?
Hmm. The alarm is set for very late in the morning in Connecticut.
Hope they all wake up soon!
oops, the link to Bass here:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/…..31617.html
Jane Hamsher @
4
707 Jane!
http://nedlamont.com/blog/1783…..atic-party
~~~Sign #23423 Joe Is Leaving the Democratic Party
From a campaign email they just sent out.
While Ned Lamont can count on the Democrat party to fund and staff his GOTV effort, we’re relying on Joe’s supporters as an independent candidate.~~~
I absolutely believe that Joe will switch to the Republicans if he wins, if doing so would keep the Republicans in control of the Senate. He’s only looking out for himself.
Anybody that votes for him is doing so strictly out of economic reasons. They think it is him that gets them those big defense contracts up there. Ned needs to counter that with some economic talk of his own. I haven’t been watching close enough to see if he is doing that or not. I believe that the Republican base is the ’show me the money’ crowd, though they like to pretend it is all about morals and ‘family values’.
I work in the defense industry and my coworkers are mostly big tax cut Republicans. I like to ask them how much of the money they have earned in their lifetime did NOT come from the federal government. That shuts them up in a hurry!
Maybe Dodd really, really hates torture…and has decided to dump the Torturelover Joe.
Thank you, Christy. It couldn’t have been said more eloquently or clearly. The heart and soul of America is counting on Connecticut.
And Olliphant, bless him, is an artist. A genius among cartoonists.
This Lieberman thing is starting to resemble a nighmare. Of course the best answer is that Ned wins and Joe goes away- but it’s beginning to look as if that ain’t gonna happen- so someone’s gonna have to figure out how to do damage control if Joe wins.
Hey Joe, maybe you should listen to some of these Republicans…(I put these together for our candidate’s debate this Sun.)
On MCA and torture: As Colin Powell so succinctly stated: “Bush’s plan to redefine the Geneva Conventions will cause the world to doubt the moral basis of the fight against terror and put our own troops at risk.”
“A persuasive argument can be made that the Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Great Writ, is the single most important bulwark in protecting our rights and freedoms … and those who have suspended it have often been treated harshly by history,” said John Huston, a retired rear admiral and former top lawyer in the Navy, at a hearing called Monday by the Senate Judiciary Committee. “It is too facile to say that the men detained in Guantnamo ‘are all terrorists,’ ‘the worst of the worst,’ and ‘all killers.’ Maybe they are. Maybe they aren’t. The point of habeas corpus is to answer those questions,” he adds.
“The United States is neither in a state of rebellion nor invasion. Consequently, it would be problematic for Congress to modify the constitutionally protected writ of habeas corpus under current events,” Kenneth Starr, the former independent prosecutor on the Whitewater investigation during the Clinton presidency, wrote in a letter to Specter.
Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., said Sunday he “vigorously” disagrees with the habeas corpus provision of the bill. … “The courts have traditionally been open to make sure that individual rights are protected, and that is fundamental,” Specter said on CNN’s “Late Edition. “And the Constitution says when you can suspend the writ of habeas corpus, in time of rebellion or invasion. And we don’t have either. So that has to be changed, in my opinion.”
Other Republicans who voted for the bill said they expected the Supreme Court to strike down the legislation because of the habeas corpus provision, ultimately sending the legislation right back to Congress. “We should have done it right, because we’re going to have to do it again,” said Senator Gordon Smith, a Republican from Oregon, who had voted to strike the habeas corpus provision, yet supported the bill.”
On Iraq: Gen. Newbold: The decision to invade Iraq, he wrote, “was done with a casualness and swagger that are the special province of those who have never had to execute these missions — or bury the results. I retired from the military four months before the invasion, in part because of my opposition to those who had used 9/11’s tragedy to hijack our security policy,” General Newbold wrote.
“There is progress being made in certain areas,” said Warner, a Virginian who chairs the Armed Services Committee. But “you just find that so many communities don’t even have drinking water. … It seems to me that the situation is simply drifting sideways.”
The United States needs to begin withdrawing troops from Iraq within the next six months, Sen. Chuck Hagel said Thursday, rather than ratcheting up its military commitment now. With Iraq exploding in sectarian violence and “moving closer and closer to a straight-out civil war,” Hagel said, the Bush administration’s decision to transfer nearly 5,000 additional U.S. troops into Baghdad is “only going to make it worse for us.” In the end, he said, “feed(ing) more American troop fodder into the fight” could result in “even a worse defeat.”
It’s still unclear what the group will recommend. Baker, in an interview on ABC television last weekend, played his cards close to his chest, but did throw out hints: “I think it’s fair to say our commission believes that there are alternatives between the stated alternatives, the ones that are out there in the political debate, of ’stay the course’ and ‘cut and run.’”
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/42957/
According to the conservative NY Sun, “A commission formed to assess the Iraq war and recommend a new course has ruled out the prospect of victory for America.”
“The more palatable of the two choices for the White House, ‘Stability First,’ argues that the military should focus on stabilizing Baghdad while the American Embassy should work toward political accommodation with insurgents. The goal of nurturing a democracy in Iraq is dropped.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.c…..yfuss.html
Read the last 4 paragraphs.
On fiscal responsibility: Sen. Enzi (R) said on Sept. 27, “The American people are tired of overspending.” The Republicans ran for election in 2000 and 2004 on the twin issues national security and fiscal responsibility. Republicans have increased the national debt by 2.43 trillion dollars after excluding the emergencies cited above. http://blogcritics.org/archive…..172127.php – Also some great stuff from the retired Generals at this link!
“Republicans have lost their way when it comes to many core GOP principles and may be in jeopardy heading into the fall elections,” Sen. Chuck Hagel (news, bio, voting record), R-Neb. says. Hagel, a possible presidential candidate in 2008, said Sunday that the GOP today is very different party from the one when he first voted Republican. “First time I voted was in 1968 on top of a tank in the Mekong Delta,” said Hagel, a Vietnam veteran. “I voted a straight Republican ticket. The reason I did is because I believe in the Republican philosophy of governance. It’s not what it used to be. I don’t think it’s the same today.” Hagel asked: “Where is the fiscal responsibility of the party I joined in ‘68? Where is the international engagement of the party I joined — fair, free trade, individual responsibility, not building a bigger government, but building a smaller government?”
ETC.: “They talk about freedom and values, but they really don’t believe in representative government.”
—Former Republican US Senator, Dave Durenberger
RW, you are killing my buzz!
From the Journal Register editorial above, it sounds as though the Dems have some leverage.
Jane Hamsher @
4
Lol, thanks for the Mountain Dew shower.
Now my paperwork is all wet.
John–Good point- they need to take advantage of what they’ve got.
Now here are the Republicans we all know and love…
When Dancing with the Stars goes bad…
hey MA folks… there’s canvassing for ned in killingly on saturday…. very conveniently close to MA and just off 395…
hint, hint… ;-)
Btw, go Tigers! 2-0 after 1 inning.
just read this, aVERY scary;
I’m sorry, the last time I saw that was the kerry election and we KNOW the electonic machines changed the results
this is too eery
now, Jane, TRex? no running in the house! put down the tazer! and TRex… your tail is lovely – quite dignified, in fact… so STOP buying PANTS!
Don’t confuse stupidity with paranoid conspiracies. They didn’t plan for Iraq either and look how that’s worked out.
Christy,
That cartoon is smashingly brilliant! LOL!
And it brought to mind these words from Roy Orbison’s “Only The Lonely”, with Junya singin’ in his loverly falsetto:
Poor ol’ Junya. Nobody loves him but dogs.
I haven’t been following the CT press that closely. Is this really the first time they’ve made this observation in print? It’s hard to believe, because the truth really has been obvious since the primary. It has only become more obvious since then. I know that some of the Republican-owned papers like the Courant have ignored this obvious truth, but that doesn’t explain why no one else has picked up on it.
OldCoastie @ 33
His tail might be dignified, but he cleans off the coffee table every time he wags it.
Joe can easily work on K-Street. IMO, Joe and his wife are being forced to run or Karl will expose both of them and their dealings with big pharma. If Hastert can be made to step down, the whole Republican campaign will fall, along with Liebermean. Is it possible to help Hastert down the steps or is he on his way down anyway? I believe this is key that will open up the door for the Dems come November.
Hastert has to go.
The entire nation, outside of Alabama and other doubtful locations, seems to have come out of a coma. But CT seems to be slipping into one. Hopefully the Dems will be ready to filibuster Bush’s next SCOTUS appointment because 50-50 won’t do it with Joe in our half. I would assume that he has already agreed with Karl on that and several other things.
So, to recap…Mel Sembler’s money, Karl Rove’s strategy, the loving wife’s Big Pharma shell game, sidelining himself for votes important to his purported party, quivering moral outrage directed at those miscreants unfortunate to have a (D) after their names, while engaging in rank mutual teabaggery with Dickie, and his fellow adherents to the church of ‘living larger-than-thou with dynamic Darwinian capitalism’…
Dare I say it? A cabinet post?
I would opine that if Lieberman wins, his eventual fate may be playing the role of Ford to Bush’s Nixon… Faux remorsefully sealing the public records for all eternity after Team Pillage puts their Bally-clad tootsies on a secure, undisclosed ottoman somewhere unextraditable.
Goopers seem to have decided to keep Hastert in place through the election and then dump him afterwards. It’s not “loyalty”, it’s the very practical issue that if he leaves- the focus will turn to three or four other goopers who could all get squashed- better to let Big Denny take the heat- he’s still leading to retain his house seat by ten points even after all this crap.
I wish the Dem leaders would stop and think how it would taste if:
a) “Dems” had a 51-49 advantage,
b) Joe voted with the Rethugs (his real Party) on, say, Roe/Wade making it 50-50, and
c) Dick (Head) Cheney got to cast the tie breaker.
This is a very real possibility.
Anyone home? Big Dog? Hill? Rahm? Class?
Bustednuckles @
37
That’s why Twisted Martini said to serve the Fall of Rome “with straw,” isn’t it? Gotta keep the floor clean, if nothing else.
If dems win the senate- then theoretically- they won’t have to worry about the fillibuster. They’ll have a majority on the judiciary committee and Clusterfuck appointees won’t ever make it to the floor of the senate.
Twisted Martini @
5
So bizarr, ’cause Webb’s biggest issue is Iraq. A vote for Lieberman is a vote against accountability.
Balrog: Anyone home? Big Dog? Hill? Rahm? Class?
Mr. Fucking Southern Vice-Chair of the DSCC M(oron). Pryor?
Grrrrrr!
OfT
It looks as though StenoSue “buried her lede” in the last two graphs.
Report Says Nonprofits Sold Influence to Abramoff
By James V. Grimaldi and Susan Schmidt
Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, October 13, 2006; 1:32 AM
Former Interior Secretary, Gale Norton, puts Abramoff and a fraudulent 501(c)3 inside the WH.
Between rigged voting machines and signing statements, it’ll be pretty hard to restore our democracy.
But as patriots, we MUST vote to throw the rascals out. And keep our eyes open to expose fraud. And speak out against signing statements—a despotic and unconstitutional power unrecognized by the founders.
possible outcomes:
1) Ned wins—no problem- big party
2) Joe wins- dems take four seats–no big problem- dems negotiate with Joe and probably give him what he wants to stay in the fold- or let him go gooper.
3) Joe wins- dems win six seats.
Here’s the nightmare scenario. Now Joe’s the deal maker who can press both parties for anything he wants to decide who controls the senate. Makes ya wanna puke.
Balrog 42 –
Nobody home, babe, specifically in regards to that sh*thead Rahm.
He’s too busy bashing Howard Dean to really do his damned job. Besides, the guy who’s really responsible in this situation is Schumer, since it’s a Senate seat and not a House seat.
Big Dog is probably not going to get involved since whatever he does draws fire, and will be seen (or spun) as a retaliatory gesture for Joe-nertia’s sanctimonious crap during Big Dog’s admin.
And Hillary? Bet you right now polling tells her she’s got not a chance in hell if Dems take Congress now as opposed to 2008. Why stick her neck out now when she can be a kingmaker with her funds on hand between November 2006 and 2008…?
Republican Pervert Theatre is brought to you by Exxon/Mobil.
Fade in to a congressional office in DC….
Congressman Jim Kolbe addresses page Jimmy.
Kolbe: “Jimmy, if you were to go on a camping trip with a congressman and a few other pages in the Grand Canyon and you woke up in the morning after the first night and you were naked, smothered in Vaseline and your bum was sore….. would you tell anyone?”
Page Jimmy: “Of course not!”
Kolbe: “Wanna go camping?”
-GSD
*CRICKETS*
rwcole @ 48
That pretty well sums it up. It seems unlikely that the Democrats will pick up that many seats this time, given that they are defending more seats than the R’s this time. So getting rid of Joe looks like a winning strategy to me, if the Democrats in the Senate have the guts to do it.
ccmask @ 51
Clinton’s fault.
John Casper @ 47
I read that piece to say Abramoff was playing both ends against the middle. Tell the tribes that Norton is the host, and they pony up. Tell Norton she is a guest, and she shows up. Abramoff cashes the checks, and everybody’s happy.
It’s Sue Ralston that puts this inside the White House, not Norton. And Sue sits right on Rover’s front porch.
Make that “Sue sat . . .” Right now, she’s sitting at a table across from a prosecutor, having a lovely little chat about her boss and Mr. Abramoff.
Meanwhile, while Sue is sitting, Karl is . . .
Perhaps TRex isn’t the only one who’s looking for clean new pants.
Boehner is clearly smoking Kool-Aid crack.
-GSD
And to think that Lieberman would have been President when Gore was assassinated!
Thanks for highlighting this editorial Christy, and for the Oliphant cartoon. Very well put.
It’s really a question now of whether Lieberman gets publicly stripped of his seniority by Reid and the Caucus, now, while it can do Ned Lamont a great deal of good, or later, when Lieberman has been given another six years by Rove and his corporate money and finally officially announces to the Democrats that he is leaving for greener pastures.
I expect absolutely nothing to be done, however, by the Minority Leadership in the Senate, because Harry Reid, Chuck Schumer and those who advise and enable them have been completely AWOL in the fight to reclaim our democracy at one crucial battle after another. They’ll wait to take it in the face from Lieberman, after all their leverage is gone. And you’re exactly right, Christy — it is the American public who will end up paying the price, not Harry Reid or Chuck Schumer, and certainly not Joseph Lieberman. Despicable.
[Jane - I’m glad nothing got broken, at least.]
Forgive me for repeating a post from this morning but it is about Cheney in Topeka,JoMo and Boyda vs. Ryun:
‘Prior to his 20-minute talk, Cheney posed for photographs with Kansans willing to pay $1,000 for the privilege, a contribution to the Ryun effort.
“Jim Ryun’s going to get kicked out of Congress,” Boyda said. The vice president said Democrats have “lost their perspective” in the war on terror. But he singled out one for praise — Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut’
Dick hearts Joe.
A love story with lead pellets.
-GSD
GSD @ 50
Who knew? I always loved Led Zeppelin.
Ecuador may elect a Hugo Chavez sympathizer.
Also, Daniel Ortega may win in Nicaragua too.
Poor Chimpy, his next two years are going to be lonely.
-GSD
GSD @ 61
Doesn’t he still have that Japanese pal that hit Graceland with him?
RoadTrip!
GSD @
62
But at least W is right – “Democracy is on the march….”
Loyalty? Check out your loyalty right here at the “George W. Bush Loyalty Quiz”
I gave it a try, answering the ten questions as Joe probably would have. Whadda ya know – Joe’s a True Believer, whose loyalty to Bush is matched only by his desire to see Bush’s liberal detractors locked away and declared enemy combatants.
No one could have anticipated that . . .
Elizabeth de la Vega has another article out: Who said all roads lead to Karl?
Still reading it – but I figured Jane and Christy might want to look at it.
He would also never forget the Democrats, like Chris Dodd, who moved to support Ned Lamont after he won the Democratic Senate nomination
Those awful Democrats! How DARE they support the person who actually won the primary instead of Joe?
That sound you hear just may be Dan Gerstein’s head exploding
Nice thought, but Dan’s head is obviously not a vital organ.
Koizumi is out…much to the chimp’s bedevilment.
Hopefully soon the chimp will be put out to pasture as well. A big pasture with a full array of orange suits with cuffs and ankle restraints and his cabinet to keep him company, forever.
also OT, this is pretty wierd. Comments by Naftali Tamir, Israeli Ambassador to Australia to a reporter from Ha’Aretz:
“Israel and Australia are like sisters in Asia,” Tamir said in an interview with Haaretz during a visit to Israel this week. “We are in Asia without the characteristics of Asians. We don’t have yellow skin and slanted eyes. Asia is basically the yellow race. Australia and Israel are not – we are basically the white race. We are on the western side of Asia and they are on the southeastern side.”
link: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/774471.html
if you think Tamir’s comments are nutty, read the reader comments below the article.
So Australia is in Asia? Whooda thunk it? Thought it was a continent. LIVE AND LEARN.
new thread – Spendthrift Republicans
Can you say “Follow the Money”? Sure you could.
ETeller – I think you’ll appreciate the take on Richard Armitage in Elizabeth’s article that Rayne linked to @65, judging from the information about Armitage you gave us. De la Vega’s analysis is very perceptive and enlightening, I think.
Ed*ard Teller @ 69
omg.
can’t get into the comments(?) but sheesh, talk about an utter lack of diplomacy and brains and total racism. Wonder what the Aborigines and other indigenous people think.
Edward Teller –
Those comments by Tamir are truly astonishing!!!
Thanks very much for that. I’m not sure I would’ve believed it if I hadn’t read it with my own eyes.
I mean, it’s one thing to *suspect* or even *believe* what you think some people might be harboring in their own private, fenced-off mental landscapes. It’s another thing entirely when they open their mouths and erase all doubt with blunt statements like that. Truly remarkable. While I’ve been focused on the unmasking of our own homegrown racists, I now see this phenomenon extends well beyond our shores.
Mr. K8 and I have been praying, every night for a very long time now, that those who love to do evil, those who are greedy and corrupt, those who exploit the vulnerable and poor of the world may be exposed by their very own words and deeds. And that they may be caught in the very snares they set for others.
Lately our evening prayers have included many expressions of gratitude for seeing this plea of ours answered daily in the headlines.
[I don’t suppose someone’s putting a new truth serum here and there in the water supply, huh?]
Mrs. K8– that was a wonderful comment and maybe our prayers are finally being answered and it is not truth serum at all.
Just truth and lots of technology and a more aware and aching world.
rwcole @
44
Not true. As a condition for not switching, Joe will probably ask for membership on those key committees. So then a majority of the committee will vote to send it to the floor, where again Joe will get to be the spoiler.
I’m sure that Joe and Karl can add this all up just as well as I can. One way or another, if Joe wins he gets to be the deciding vote on all the good committees. The fact that he has to vote however Karl tells him to vote doesn’t matter: to Joe he still gets the glory of being the key vote.
it is a small, but essential piece of American recovery from our succumbing to cult of republicanism insanity that the likes of joe losermon go down. losermon is a poster child for the problem – he has nothing to offer as part of the solution.
.
Joe has always wanted us to be impressed by his moral superiority and religious piety. Yet he seems unimpressed by the estimated 650,000 innocent deaths his favorite war has inflicted on Iraqis. Are the God-fearing, church-going people of CT going to relect this amoral man?