<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Language of a Democratic Realignment: Reality Is the New Morality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/10/reality-is-the-new-morality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/10/reality-is-the-new-morality/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:36:18 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: owlbear1</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/10/reality-is-the-new-morality/#comment-332087</link>
		<dc:creator>owlbear1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 06:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/10/reality-is-the-new-morality/#comment-332087</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If Dems don’t figure out a way to kill the Billions of dollars stolen by all the war profiteers, those profiteers will spend that money to get more Republicans elected.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Dems don’t figure out a way to kill the Billions of dollars stolen by all the war profiteers, those profiteers will spend that money to get more Republicans elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 60yoh</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/10/reality-is-the-new-morality/#comment-332065</link>
		<dc:creator>60yoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 05:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/10/reality-is-the-new-morality/#comment-332065</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;swopa, indeed, and encouraging.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;with respect, i would encourage all to plan and plant (and nurture) a ‘victory garden’.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i vote for peas!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;because, as we all know;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;‘food will get us through times of no politics better than politics will get us through times of no food’.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;carrots are cool, too.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>swopa, indeed, and encouraging.</p>
<p>with respect, i would encourage all to plan and plant (and nurture) a ‘victory garden’.</p>
<p>i vote for peas!</p>
<p>because, as we all know;</p>
<p>‘food will get us through times of no politics better than politics will get us through times of no food’.</p>
<p>carrots are cool, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dlake</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/10/reality-is-the-new-morality/#comment-332009</link>
		<dc:creator>dlake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 04:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/10/reality-is-the-new-morality/#comment-332009</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I love this article.  YOu touched on one of the important things about the nightmare years.  lack of reality and substance.  All show.  And the public enjoyed watching the bush version of reality tv which is really a fiction.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this article.  YOu touched on one of the important things about the nightmare years.  lack of reality and substance.  All show.  And the public enjoyed watching the bush version of reality tv which is really a fiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newspaperbrat</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/10/reality-is-the-new-morality/#comment-331899</link>
		<dc:creator>newspaperbrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 02:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/10/reality-is-the-new-morality/#comment-331899</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-331892&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;egregious @ 103&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;A high level moderate Washington Republican, whom I may not name, thinks they will bring Romney to the nomination.  McCain is also possible.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While I’m not up to speed on Romney I would certainly relish the idea of McCain as their nominee - almost too easy to imagine the grief his emergence would rain down on his pointy little head. My late husband, who served as a US Army intelligence officer in Viet Nam before and after McCain became a POW lost all respect for him for his involvement in the savings and loan scandal.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-331892"><em>egregious @ 103</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>A high level moderate Washington Republican, whom I may not name, thinks they will bring Romney to the nomination.  McCain is also possible.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>While I’m not up to speed on Romney I would certainly relish the idea of McCain as their nominee &#8211; almost too easy to imagine the grief his emergence would rain down on his pointy little head. My late husband, who served as a US Army intelligence officer in Viet Nam before and after McCain became a POW lost all respect for him for his involvement in the savings and loan scandal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RevDeb</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/10/reality-is-the-new-morality/#comment-331896</link>
		<dc:creator>RevDeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 02:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/10/reality-is-the-new-morality/#comment-331896</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-331894&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;JupiterPluvius @ 105&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I’d love for them to nominate Romney!  The fundamentalist Christianofascists would stay home in droves, because, you know, LDS Church. Also, he’s a horrible, horrible speaker.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And he has absolutely NO record in MA to run on. It’s been 4 years of thumb twiddling, marking time so he could then go out on the road and campaign for what he really wants. He’s an empty suit.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-331894"><em>JupiterPluvius @ 105</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>I’d love for them to nominate Romney!  The fundamentalist Christianofascists would stay home in droves, because, you know, LDS Church. Also, he’s a horrible, horrible speaker.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And he has absolutely NO record in MA to run on. It’s been 4 years of thumb twiddling, marking time so he could then go out on the road and campaign for what he really wants. He’s an empty suit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/10/reality-is-the-new-morality/#comment-331895</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 02:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/10/reality-is-the-new-morality/#comment-331895</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nice post. I think that the well-known liberal bias of reality is essential to moving forward. Wingers are not pragmatists.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rove is a classic postmodernist.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moral impoverishment is an eventual consequence of postmodernism.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. I think that the well-known liberal bias of reality is essential to moving forward. Wingers are not pragmatists.</p>
<p>Rove is a classic postmodernist.</p>
<p>Moral impoverishment is an eventual consequence of postmodernism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JupiterPluvius</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/10/reality-is-the-new-morality/#comment-331894</link>
		<dc:creator>JupiterPluvius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 02:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/10/reality-is-the-new-morality/#comment-331894</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I’d love for them to nominate Romney!  The fundamentalist Christianofascists would stay home in droves, because, you know, LDS Church. Also, he’s a horrible, horrible speaker.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’d love for them to nominate Romney!  The fundamentalist Christianofascists would stay home in droves, because, you know, LDS Church. Also, he’s a horrible, horrible speaker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: osprey</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/10/reality-is-the-new-morality/#comment-331893</link>
		<dc:creator>osprey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 02:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/10/reality-is-the-new-morality/#comment-331893</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well said, RevDeb at 99.  It’ll be fun to watch it play out…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On another note,&lt;br /&gt;
K.O. on habeas corpus is up on C&amp;L.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, RevDeb at 99.  It’ll be fun to watch it play out…</p>
<p>On another note,<br />
K.O. on habeas corpus is up on C&amp;L.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egregious</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/10/reality-is-the-new-morality/#comment-331892</link>
		<dc:creator>egregious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 02:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/10/reality-is-the-new-morality/#comment-331892</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A high level moderate Washington Republican, whom I may not name, thinks they will bring Romney to the nomination.  McCain is also possible.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A high level moderate Washington Republican, whom I may not name, thinks they will bring Romney to the nomination.  McCain is also possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JupiterPluvius</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/10/reality-is-the-new-morality/#comment-331891</link>
		<dc:creator>JupiterPluvius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 02:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/10/reality-is-the-new-morality/#comment-331891</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-331865&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Marion in Savannah @&lt;br /&gt;
                96              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-331814&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;JupiterPluvius @ 51&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The thing that really could make a Democratic victory important is that the Democrats would be doing it without the Dixiecrats for the first time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Think about that.  Past Democratic control of Congress depended on an alliance with people like Strom Thurmond and Zell Miller.  If the Democrats get control this time, it’d be done honestly, without pandering to the racists; even former Dixiecrats like Robert Byrd are real, if center-rightish, Democrats these days.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is something very very important that nobody ever talks about.  The “Southern Strategy” that brought the GOP into power depended hugely on a massive Anschluss of the Dixiecrat powerbase into the Republican Party.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Democratic majority in Congress this time would be a true Democratic majority, not a Klan Koalition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well, yeah…  but please bear in mind that there are some of us down here who don’t fall into that possibly over-broad category of “Dixiecrats.”  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But of course.  I was only referring to actual, self-proclaimed “Dixiecrats” when using the term “Dixiecrat”–Phil Gramm, Jesse Helms, Strom Thurmond, et al.  I guess calling Zell Miller the “last of the Dixiecrats” is a bit of a stretch, technically, but the shoe certainly seems to fit, doesn’t it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was in no way using it as a synonym for Democrats from the South!  I’m appalled when people do that, because “Dixiecrat” has an actual meaning.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-331865"><em>Marion in Savannah @<br />
                96              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-331814"><em>JupiterPluvius @ 51</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>The thing that really could make a Democratic victory important is that the Democrats would be doing it without the Dixiecrats for the first time.</p>
<p>Think about that.  Past Democratic control of Congress depended on an alliance with people like Strom Thurmond and Zell Miller.  If the Democrats get control this time, it’d be done honestly, without pandering to the racists; even former Dixiecrats like Robert Byrd are real, if center-rightish, Democrats these days.</p>
<p>This is something very very important that nobody ever talks about.  The “Southern Strategy” that brought the GOP into power depended hugely on a massive Anschluss of the Dixiecrat powerbase into the Republican Party.</p>
<p>A Democratic majority in Congress this time would be a true Democratic majority, not a Klan Koalition.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well, yeah…  but please bear in mind that there are some of us down here who don’t fall into that possibly over-broad category of “Dixiecrats.”  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>But of course.  I was only referring to actual, self-proclaimed “Dixiecrats” when using the term “Dixiecrat”–Phil Gramm, Jesse Helms, Strom Thurmond, et al.  I guess calling Zell Miller the “last of the Dixiecrats” is a bit of a stretch, technically, but the shoe certainly seems to fit, doesn’t it?</p>
<p>I was in no way using it as a synonym for Democrats from the South!  I’m appalled when people do that, because “Dixiecrat” has an actual meaning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
