
Generally when one thinks of “labor news,” one thinks of the fate of today’s unions, the split between the AFL-CIO and Change To Win, or decisions by the courts and the National Labor Relations Board that undermine workers’ rights.
It turns out, however, that there are still a lot of real workers out there who depend on their unions to defend their jobs, their pay and their retirement. And more than depending on their union, they’re depending on a concept that has become rarer in this society: solidarity.
Not that you would know it from reading the papers, or listening to political debates or (with one exception) in the blogosphere these days, but 15,000 of those workers at Goodyear Tire and Rubber walked off the job last week at 16 plants in the United States and Canada. The workers had been working under daily contract extensions since July 22 when their contract ran out. They're fighting over life and death issues that have stricken masses of middle class Americans over the past decades – loss of well-paying jobs, salary and benefit cuts, and undermining of promised retirement benefits. Instead of shutting down, Goodyear is running its factories with management employees and scabs.
The workers are represented by the United Steelworkers of America which represents Goodyear employees in Alabama, Kansas, Ohio, Nebraska, New York, North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Wisconsin, and in Collingwood, Toronto and Owen Sound in Canada. Goodyear is the third largest tire company in the world, behind Bridgestone and Michelin. The main issue of the strike is Goodyear’s failure to ensure the survival of at least two of its plants, in Tyler, Texas, and Gadsen, Alabama which were not put on the company’s list of “protected” factories.
The union, which made major concessions during contract negotiations three years ago is feeling betrayed:
"The company left us with no option," said USW executive vice president Ron Hoover. "We cannot allow additional plant closures after the sacrifices we made three years ago to help this company survive." In the 2003 agreement, the USW agreed to a closure of the Huntsville, Ala. facility as well providing Goodyear with additional financial flexibility by accepting wage, pension and health care cuts.
"We worked very hard with the company in 2003 to deal with a difficult situation," said Hoover. "While more work can be done, Goodyear has rebounded and other stakeholders have been rewarded accordingly. Now the Company seems determined to only take more away from our members."
To add insult to injury, the company's words had been quite praiseworthy of the union for helping the company regain profitability after its near death experience in 2003 when Goodyear lost more than $1 billion, and took on billions in debt. Things are looking much better for the profitable company these days, but instead of putting its money where its mouth it, Goodyear has instead fed its own mouth:
Goodyear has previously been vocal about the vital role the union played in its $1 billion turnaround plan led by CEO Robert Keegan. Keegan earned a $2.6 million bonus last year on top of a $1.1 million salary, according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Four other top executives were paid a total of $2.4 million in bonuses, plus six-figure salaries.
"If the company was in financial trouble and management was willing to take cuts themselves, we would be willing to do whatever was necessary to save our company," said Darryl Jackson of Local 959 in Fayetteville, N.C., where about 2,150 tiremakers are striking.
The company, of course, is blaming "global competition:
We simply cannot accept a contract that knowingly creates a competitive disadvantage versus our foreign-owned competition and increases our cost disadvantage versus imports," Jim Allen, Goodyear's chief negotiator, said in a statement.
But Goodyear employees have decided to fight:
Steve Huston, who has worked at the Topeka, Kan., plant for 36 years, said he understood what was at risk. "Nobody is glad to be on strike, but we're trying to hold onto what we have and they are trying to take more benefits and wages from us," he said. Dan Colby, 38, who works at Goodyear's Tonawanda, N.Y., plant near Buffalo, said the strike would be a hardship on most employees, many of whom have families with small children. "We work hard and are deserving of what we get," he said.
In addition to the threatened plant closures, the company also wants to cut back on retiree health care. According to former USW local president, Doug Wrestler
Someone who retired 15 years ago after working 40 years with Goodyear may be bringing home just a $600-a-month pension plus Social Security, he said. Widows of Goodyear union workers who gathered at Local 2's union hall earlier in the week said that once their husbands died, the pensions stopped as well. That left many of them to rely solely on Social Security. If a new contract forces higher medical payments on them, that would be a real burden, they said.
In June, the USW reached an agreement with Michelin subsidiary BF Goodrich which it hoped to set as a pattern for upcoming negotiations with Goodyear.
Remember, these workers are sacrificing themselves not only for their brothers and sisters in the two threatened plants, but for all middle class Americans who are fighting to retain the pay, benefits, retirement and job security that they've fought for and won over the past half century. Is it an exercize in futility, fighting the unbeatable forces of globalization? Maybe. But at some point, what do you have to lose?
So, don't buy Goodyear tires. And if you happen to be in the neighborhood of a Goodyear plant, go on down and walk the picket line for a while. Ultimately they're fighting for all of us.
Related posts:





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Fitz!
FDL!
Ladies and Gentlemen, Boys and Girls, Children of all ages,
This sort of crap is why we have to get control of the US health care “system” (Actually, it would be more accurate to call it a health care chaos, but I digress) away from its current employment base.
One definition of insanity is to keep performing the same acts and expecting a different outcome. We’ve tried employment-based health-care financing, and it’s now clear that:
* we have higher per capita expenses than any other industrialized country;
* we have worse measureable health care outcomes than most industrialized countries.
So why are we trying to patch this system that clearly doesn’t work for anyone!
BC
Bargain Countertenor–
You’re right. It’s not a health care system. It’s a sickness treatment-if you have the money-chaotic mess.
Unions helped this country to be what it is today.
People who think they don’t matter anymore need to look at labor conditions in the Gilded Age. Bad, for children and adults.
We also are going to need union workers, skilled workers, if we’re ever in a little bind like we were after Pearl Harbor.
NAFTA, CAFTA, DLC, DINO Demos, right to work, and Republicans . The colluding bane of labor in this country.
My grandfather was a union member; my father was a union member; I was proud to be a union member for 16 years. All of us went on strike at one time or another, trying to keep our employers from snatching food from our children’s plate. Read your history — unions are what created the middle class in this country, and if unions go, then so go all of us. It infuriates the hell out of me when politicians court the unions, then sell them out the first chance they get. We can save this country this next election, and when we do, let’s don’t forget what makes our country strong — men and women who take pride in what they do, and deserve every dime they are paid.
Deacon Blues: Amen! Right on!
As long as the creep of outsourcing continues, American workers will lose ground. This is not a difficult concept.
OK at 8: Sadly, I think we must accept that outsourcing is here to stay. There was a feature piece last night on one of the Aussie news programs about call centers in India and the numbers of jobs going there from here (mostly banks and insurance companies so far).
The fact is that jobs that can be done remotely will be, which leaves progressives with the task of promoting education to help those who have lost out be trained for jobs that require physical presence. Here, for example, there is a huge shortage of skilled tradesmen (electricians, plumbers and the like) but too few programs to teach the skills needed.
In a preview of what may happen in the US the government pushed through a series of “work place reforms” that really targeted working people and was designed to destroy the historically strong unions.
It really will be a struggle to protect those least able to protect themselves.
It just makes no sense for white collar or blue collar workers to vote Republican. It’s NOT just hourly types losing their jobs and/or standard of living, it’s the salaried professional types that are getting the shaft too. And because of corporate greed our kids are really starting to hurt. There are solutions.
Bargain Countertenor @
3
It’s probably even worse than you’re laying it out to be. I work in it, and I’ve seen some of the stupidest “cost-cutting” maneuvers (which usually involve getting rid of clerks, telephone operators, etc., etc.) in order to do heaven only knows what… God only knows the upper management gets theirs, and there’s always a new building to build… The docs in the practice I work for (tertiary ENT specialty practice) are so angry and frustrated they don’t know what to do. The harder they work the less they see, and then their staff keeps getting cut.
Let’s not even BEGIN to talk about the “Medicare drug bill.” I’ve always hated doughnuts…
Can we all say, together, and OUT LOUD, please:
This crap has got to stop.
Thank you. As you were.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 9
One of the things I never could understand was why, in both 2000 and 2004, people I otherwise would have considered at least sane if not well informed turned out in DROVES to vote against their own economic self-interest. I doubt I’ll ever understand it.
I grew up in a steel town. The beautiful orange sky translated into asthma for me, but jobs for 10,000 families.
The company is on the very edge of deciding to abrogate all health care benefits for people on pension, and very possibly all retirement benefits in general.
We are a large and prosperous family who can support our elderly retired mom, but for many, many others it is a bitter end. And it may be the bitter end of an entire city, that has depended on steel profits for generations.
What can be done?
Bargain Countertenor @ 3
This is so true. “Socialized medicine,” hell — it would improve U.S. companies’ ability to compete in their markets.
Grammar Nerd Alert:
“Their fighting” should be “They’re fighting.”
End of pedantism.
Oklahoma kiddo @
9
Have you read “The Trouble With Kansas”? I like one of the central thrusts in the book: until recently, neither Democrats nor Republicans have been looking out for the middle class. The DLC, who we can thank for all of the Democratic head-up-assery (I like this word) we’ve seen ceased to have the Democrats be the party of Labor, but instead the other party of Companies. So, when these blue collar guys are at the booth, they think, well, both of these groups are going to shaft me, but at least one group claims to share my moral values. I’ll go with them.
Which is why the Democrats need to be Progressive so badly, if only for their own identity. They need to reclaim the vision of the people and demonstrate that they’re on the side of the people and the labor unions. I’m really psyched to see so many progressive candidates in the field right now (and electable, thanks to Foley), but we have a long way to go still before we can return to America’s golden era.
Thanks for yet another great post, Jordan.
Closed conference call tomorrow night with Andy Stern; I think this post would be marvelous pre-meeting briefer material for the attendees. I’ll distribute it now.
Thanks again.
I think a big part of labor’s problem is we are now a debtor nation. It wasn’t always this way. Everyone spends money they simply don’t have. Money spent on non-winnable wars, tax cuts for the wealthy, top-heavy salaries, credit cards and so forth, could be better spent on manufacturing upgrades, education and worker training. And of course we save none of our earnings anymore, because there’s nothing left over at the end of the month to save.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 16
Absolutely! Plus, please factor in the “bread and circuses” aspect of our culture since, oh, about the 1970s. And my guess is that it didn’t help when “heck of a job, Bushie” ’s only response after 9/11 to the American people’s inquiry of “what shall we sacrifice?” was “go shopping.” I happen to HATE shopping for the sake of shopping….
Regarding your meeting with Andy Stern. SEIU’s organizing program meets the needs of the janitors, window washers, security guards and other low paid workers whose work can’t be exported to China. But what about industrial workers who are competing over wages and working conditions? No one seems to have come up with a plan for organizing more of these workers and saving their jobs. Do we end up having to give up on them, succumbing to globalism? One thing we could do, of course, is take the burden of health care off of employers. (The old joke: GM and Ford are really insurance companies who also make cars)
Something to think and talk to Andy about.
Oklahoma kiddo @
16
True, true.
And one day, the world will call the debt. If we’re lacking, we’d best hope we have very resilient kneecaps.
Deacon Blues @
6
It is very true that unions created the middle class in this country. I know many people whose families have become successful thanks to unions. My father used to say (with irony) that the unions were too successful. People grew economically comfortable and thought it was solely because of their own efforts, and forgot what unions have done. We really need unions. If it were not for my local of UFCW, my salary, pension, health care, everything would be reduced and eaten away.
Jordan Barab @ 18
I’ve mentioned before, commenting to 2 or 3 other posts, that as a medical transcriptionist I know full well that lots of our jobs are being outsourced to places like Bangladesh (sp?). The problem with that is that the folks who do the work there adhere to “what doctor says goes,” even if doc is tired or makes a mistake. OOOPS… your record just said you’re supposed to get 10 times the amount of Synthroid you need. And my profession is just one of the latest. I’ll bet you can find BUNCHES of outsourced programmers in Silicon Valley, and the beat (or beat-down of the American worker) goes on…
I”m wondering if there is a coherent discussion, consistent with economic principles, of how to deal with global competition? There was a discussion between Robert Reich and Gov. Richardson on Larry King, and I still don’t know what makes sense.
This week I overheard a couple of ladies bitching about their working conditions. So I asked them if they belonged to a union. No, they didn’t. So then I asked them if they realized that workers in this country never got a damn thing that didn’t come from the power of labor unions, and how that power has been diluted and dismantled over the last few decades – ON PURPOSE. My little personal mission, since I’ve been following Jordan’s posts, is to raise awareness one worker at a time, what is the cause and the remedy of whatever they’re bitching about.
Jordan #18 — got your comment, will pass that on tomorrow night.
I’ve shared that sentiment with you for some time; I don’t understand why we as a country expect our manufacturing and service businesses to compete with other countries when the playing field isn’t level. One of the biggest single handicaps is healthcare; auto makers in other countries, for example, do not have to pick up the cost of healthcare since it is viewed as a national imperative and not a corporate burden.
But this would require the cooperation and collaboration of government, corporation and workers alike to shift the burden away from cost of production, so that ultimately the relationship between business and workers is not adversarial.
No small feat.
I just finished reading Tom Geoghegan’s Which Side Are You On? – very worthwhile reading – tho quite sad … the loss of our unions is a real wound
Thanks Jordan Barab for sharing this information with us. What business does does not surprise me, but I’m baffled why so many people apparently vote against their own best interest.
Rayne @ 23
I agree completely that government paid or guaranteed health care/insurance would eliminate part of the “competitive disadvantage” faced by domestic producers, but only part. So long as third and fourth world wages are substantially lower than ours, companies like Goodyear will use that as an excuse to lower the wages of their US workers, and not just their benefits. IMHO, anyway.
For Bargain Countertenor –
(OT for others)
Hi! I’ve been keeping my eyes peeled for you since last we “spoke” here. It was a while ago now, but we had a conversation about an article in The New Yorker about Pete Seeger (a terrific article).
If you remember, I promised to dig up my copy so I could tell you what issue it was in. I found it late that same night, but when I looked back here, I couldn’t find you.
Adding to the problem of finding you was the fact that I couldn’t get here to the blog every day, so we probably passed like the proverbial “ships in the night” quite a few times.
Thank goodness I’ve caught sight of you! Hope you are doing well in these suspenseful weeks before November.
Here’s the info:
In the April 17, 2006 issue of the New Yorker –
by Alec Wilkinson:
PROFILES -
The Protest Singer
Pete Seeger’s New Audience
pages 44 through 53 inclusive
Should you have trouble finding a copy, look for me again (yeah, I know, I’m not here every day, but will always pop in again) and I’d be happy to get Mr. K8 to photocopy it at work to mail to you.
Enjoy!
Thanks, Jordan, for keeping us abreast with developments in labor relations – like Howie, you search out crucial information for us that we wouldn’t have otherwise. I’m very grateful for what you do.
Hey Mrs. K8! How are you?
Hey Leslie!
Lately I’ve been dealing with lots more pain than usual. I’m struggling to keep the exercise level going in spite of that.
The physical therapist has started “lymphedema massage” even though the swelling is minimal, ’cause the lymphedema swelling seems to correlate directly with the increased pain. (Heaven knows if the link is causative, however — the body is so “mysterious” which is another way of saying nobody REALLY knows how to alleviate my problem.)
The pain doc wants to give me a shot of depomedrol in the sacroiliac joint — in part to try to relieve the worst of the pain, but also for diagnostic purposes. If it helped it would indicate *something.*
I’m thinking I might agree to it (although I won’t have any more shots of that stuff in the epidural lumbar area, ’cause I’ve been hearing of patients developing horrible arachnoiditis (which cannot then be cured, and is so unremittingly painful people have committed suicide because of it) as a side effect of such shots to the cerebrospinal fluid area. However, I’ll probably give it another month to see if the physical therapist’s massage approach gives any relief first.
I’d hate to do both at the same time, get relief, but then not know WHICH was the beneficial agent.
The pupster’s doing well, and is very happy that we bought me a “hands-free” leash which wraps around my hips and enables me to feel more stable with my cane, so we’ve started doing daily walks to go along with the daily swim (water is currently 82 degrees with a pool blanket). I’ll probably quit the swimming when the water temp drops to 70 or 72.
Now — how are YOU, dear lady? Still as nefarious as ever? Hugs and good wishes to you and yours.
Um, sorry to everybody else for being so off topic.
I want to thank Jordan for another important and informative piece, excellent as usual.
Jordan — do you think eventually that labor movements will become in some as yet undetermined way INTERNATIONAL, so as to fight the multinational corporate shell game of moving manufacturing all around the world to exploit the poor?
mrs k8 – shoot me an email sometime – my son has a pain thing and I may have a few tips …
In the Wal-Mart World and BushCo’s move towards minor if any Governmental restrictions on business in which we live, sadly, I don’t think that the pressure and negative smear campaigns towards Unions should come as surprise.
YDeacon Blues @ 6
Amen, Amen, Amen
I’ve never understood how outsourcing middle class jobs helps US Industry.
I mean, how many fridges are millionaries gonna buy per capita to make up for it? Who will be buying cars if no one makes enough to buy a new one other than every 8-10 years? Who will buy homes if folks are ruining credit ratings over medical bills?
I understand how businesses save money in labor and manufacturing sending jobs overseas. I do not see how that means more sales when their main market demographic is finacially gutted in that process. I do not see how Indonesian Nike workers are gonna buy a new Pathfinder and Whirlpool.
From first-hand experience, I recommend my brothers and sisters at Goodyear stick to their guns.
My experience as a former airline employee was, once you give in, management comes back for more (I note they’re running that play at Goodyear, too), until their request becomes unsustainable. Then, citing market conditions, management takes the company into a very corporate-friendly BK, and takes what they want by abrogating contracts.
Better to take them on NOW, while a BK claim is hard to prove.You stand a chance to win, and even if you lose, you were going to in BK anyhow.
Stand NOW, fight NOW. There is no tomorrow.
MrsK8,
Thanks! My mother-in-law subscribes to the New Yorker, so I’ll call her and see if she still has that number…
As far as the stretch run to November goes, I’m resigned to the re-election of Steve Pearce (R — Fossil Fuels) to represent my district (NM-2) again.
I still have hopes for Patsy Madrid ekeing out a win over Heather Wilson(R — Torture and Constitution disemboweling) in Albuquerque. Heather’s back-pedalling big time now. Yesterday she suggested that Bill Richardson be part of a bipartisan delegation to Pyongyang. My fervent hope is that Bush, Rove & Co don’t understand why she’s slapping at Dubya and cut support… but folks in hell are more likely to get ice water first.
Thanks again,
BC
Jordan Barab@18
Its interesting to see opinions reflecting service jobs as somehow untouchable and protectable. Belive me, when the corporate elites get done moving the movable jobsthen the
laws allowing the workers to work here will start. This is evident in the proposed privatization of the Postal service. They’ll simply bid on delivering the mail and pretty soon your mail carrier wont speak English.