
The number one New Year's resolution for Americans is not to lose weight or quit smoking - it is to get out of debt. -- Andy Stern
I'm honored to present Andy Stern's book to the Firedoglake community. I'm a blogger at MyDD, and over the past few years of blogging I've noticed that different blogs have sort of different neighborhood 'feels' to them. My sense is that the FDL community is made up of people who get things done, the people on political campaigns who are the essential pieces, the people who don't need credit but make sure that everything works. When I have the FDL community on my side, I know you will be loyal, smart, and extraordinarily helpful. And let's just say that political actors should not get on your bad side, because that's a very unpleasant place to be.
FDL and the union movement have a lot in common.
Literally nothing in Democratic politics could happen without unions. Labor provides the money for campaigns, the reliable volunteers who show up rain or shine. Labor helps with field, GOTV, and media. It's not just that labor provides a lot of help, it's that labor provides help reliably, cycle after cycle. Unions don't get bored with politics, they don't decide that politics doesn't matter, and union members show up and vote in primaries up and down the ticket. They invest long-term in voter registration programs, they build infrastructure that the party committees have traditionally scoffed at, and they have been an immense force in progressive politics for a hundred years, holding politicians accountable for their choices in office. And from what I've seen, union members are much less likely to make political choices based on race-baiting tactics that the right uses so well. Unions simply create progressive voters.
In fact, I just got done reading through Karl Rove's 72 hour program presentation he gave in 2001, which was the blueprint for successful Republican turnout efforts in 2002 and 2004. Rove based his blueprint on labor turnout programs; he was impressed with the outreach and institutional learning that has been so effective in helping union members have a disproportionate on the electorate in 1998 and 2000. So when he wanted to figure out how to get evangelicals to have the same impact, he copied labor's strategy and tactics. It worked. This isn't the first time the right copied labor; labor practically invented the PAC system to move money to progressive candidates after World War II, which the business PACs only got around to doing in the late 1970s. So though you may not believe it, unions are politically innovative. And if we are to have any chance at building a progressive majority, unions are going to be a big part of how we do it.
This of course makes the crisis in union membership a crisis for all of us. In 1945, nearly one third of all households were union households. By 1998, that percentage dropped to 13.8%. The decline of the union movement parallels the decline of the Democratic Party. The gradual rightward turn of the country, the decline of the nation's industrial base, and a lack of investment in organizing new workers and corruption within union leadership undermined the reach of this largely progressive body of voters. It's the fairly standard tragedy of industrial America; labor leaders were seduced by their access to power, and rather than work on modernization and structural problems, they held on to the past and allowed their unions to ossify.
In other words, it would be great to win in 2006, but long-term, we progressives have a big problem because a giant piece of our coalition is evaporating. Labor needs its own 50 state strategy, and we need to be a part of it. But more than just the politics, we know that an America where work is not rewarded is an America destined for a fall.
Which brings me to Andy Stern, and his new book, A Country that Works. Stern runs SEIU (Service Employees International Union), the fastest growing union in the country and certainly the most dynamic, with around 2 million members who you might've seen clad in trademark purple shirts at political rallies. What's remarkable about that last sentence is the that the words 'growing' and 'union' are next to each other. Stern has for his last thirty years in the union movement understood that a growth strategy is critical to protecting and advancing worker rights and wages. SEIU isn't just remarkable because it's been growing, it's remarkable because of the new sectors and regions in which it is organizing, as well as the way that SEIU tries to ensure that the companies it unionizes are viable enterprises. Last year, SEIU successfully organized 5000 janitors in Houston, a traditional bastion of hostility towards labor. Most of these newly organized workers are Hispanic, a group that is a huge and growing part of the American labor force.
Behind every successful organization is a moral vision, and that's where 'A Country that Works' comes in. This book isn't just about unions, it's about the modern American workforce and our place in a globalized world. The first two chapters describe the challenges facing all of us; an indebted and interconnected workforce with a decimated health care system and increasingly unreliable pension system, competing against China, the most significant economic competitor this country has ever had. The book moves on to Andy's personal story, how he joined the union movement, how he fought for changes, his stewardship of SEIU, his daughter's death, and the eventual break with the AFL-CIO and the formation of Change to WIn. The final part of the book discusses solutions - the need for global unions, the need for changes in the tax system, pensions, health care, education, expansion of the internet, etc. There's a nice part where he goes into problems with politics and how the Democratic Party is structured (we're not the only unhappy ones). His observations about the Dean movement, the Kerry campaign, and the series of economic diversions that obscure the truth about our global economy are also intriguing, if only because it's rare that I hear someone talk about wages and worker rights from anything but a theoretical perspective.
Fundamentally, 'A Country that Works' is a book about leadership and power, about making change within ourselves and within our own institutions to change the country and the world for the better. Stern's rise is due both to his extraordinary capacity as a leader, as well as the singular historical moment we find ourselves in, the same moment that has created the blogosphere as an institutional response to a broken model for press and political organizing.
So once again, I'm honored to introduce Andy Stern's book to FDL. We are from kindred communities. SEIU and the blogosphere is full of progressives; we are both passionate reformers seeking to reshape what it means to be a citizen in modern America. Over the next ten years, I expect real and important alliances to form between what we're doing and what the labor movement is doing. And I wouldn't mess with either of us.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight



Support this site!
Keep
up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search


RSS/XML Feed
Matt!
Andy!
Sweet Jane!
I’m curious if there are others here, like myself, who are turning to old, rousing stories of the union battles at the beginning of the twentieth century, and stories of the attempts to strengthen and promote unions in the FDR era.
These “old histories” are truly inspiring. I’ve been predicting for a while now that the cultural trends and political themes that helped pick the nation up from the depths of the Depression will once again be replayed in the mass media years to come. We already see traces of this in renewed interest in Woody Guthrie, Jonathan Alter’s FDR book, Bruce Springsteen’s drawing on early Pete Seegers work, etc.
We have rich wellsprings of hope in our history to mine in the long, long battles ahead.
Mrs. K8 @
3
Mrs. K8 — would love to hear more about these.
Matt will be with us in a few minutes. I’m really excited about this book and about building bridges with labor in general — they know much that they can teach us and I think we can really help each other.
As an aside — during the first GWB campaign, Rove stated that his very favorite President in history was Wm. McKinley, and that his role model was Mark Hannah, McKinley’s right hand aide.
This scared the bejeebers out of me THEN. The Gilded Age. America as Imperial Power. It all fits.
The Patriot Act is a miserable echo of the Palmer Raids, too.
We seem to be repeating history in all sorts of ways.
A rebirth of the union movement, perhaps this time in a TRULY international form, is not out of the question, IMO.
Stoller in the house! what a treat!
and what important points for us to remember!
Here’s a link to Andy Stern’s blog.
As Stern makes clear even in his recent blog posts on Wal-Mart Stores and China, unionization and living wages have to be understood as international concerns, not so much limited to the 50 states in the U.S.
Jane –
Will be happy to talk about this more later — Mr. K8 and I have to go out now, sorry to say. I’d LOVE to be here for the whole discussion and will have to make do with reading the thread later.
I’ve been learning a lot by googling and following links wherever they lead.
For example, just following the links on “Joe Hill” and his execution at the hands of the copper mining bosses from the Wikipedia entry was fruitful.
Then there’s the whole Molly McGuires story in Pennsylvania — truly hair-raising stuff.
Or pursuing it from the dark side — learning the history of the Pinkerton Agency itself is eye-opening (privatized police/paramilitary way back when) or the Wall Street explosion at JP Morgan’s (courtesy of Italian anarchists) and the unfolding of the Palmer Raids themselves will provide links to links to links.
When I can’t sleep at night worrying about the future of this beloved country, I like to at least learn stuff…
These toobz are amazing!
Enjoy the discussion, everybody! See y’all later.
Andy,
First of all, I would like to thank the SIEU for it’s steadfast endorsment of Howard Dean in 2002.
It warmed the hearts of everyone connected to the campaign.
Back in 2002 Howard Dean made big points about the need to export our Unions and the need to repeal Taft-Hartley. Here in 2006, your thoughts on these topics would be appreciated.
Mrs. K8 — I will, they sound amazing.
SS#9 — Andy will be here next week.
This will not be the first time in America’s history that she turns to her unions for strength and direction. It is heartening to find not only the unions but agriculture (I see my local Dem using the argument that America can create “National Security Crops” and the many segments of our great party re-discovering their shared values which will hopefully re-energize the base of the Dem Party.
sorry.
Mrs. K8 @
5
Wow, nice catches Mrs. K8.
Not sure if an international union will work anytime soon or not, but there isn’t a lot of upside left in industrial globalization’s wage arbitrage. Walmart has been able to effectively free-ride the differences in wage labor, but to grow more they’ll rub up against political instability, higher product manufacturing costs, and transportation expense and disruptions. When your supply line is 20,000 miles long, it’s pretty vulnerable, and it begins to make local production make sense again.
So if local production, then why not local unions? Then successful local practices, know-how, and structures could spread cross-country and internationally. Going back even further in time, this is how I imagine the Guild system formed.
It seems that Andy Stern, President of the SEIU, is to the labor movement what progressive blogs are to the Democratic Party. A little background from Wikipedia:
Andy’s short bio
I need more education, as I have not yet gotten into the book: what is the SEIU doing that is new and forward looking? Can we get an synopsis?
And from what I’ve seen, union members are much less likely to make political choices based on race-baiting tactics that the right uses so well. Unions simply create progressive voters.
I read the linked article, and it’s a good one. But I think the above statements, especially the second one, are too broad. Unionized workers aren’t immune to regional political and cultural influences and biases.
In 1945, nearly one third of all households were union households. By 1998, that percentage dropped to 13.8%. The decline of the union movement parallels the decline of the Democratic Party.
Wow. That by itself is a powerful argument for why the netroots should not only try to coordinate/partner more effectively with labor, but why we should seek to parallel it as an outreach & community-building mechanism, if only to help make up for some of that decline.
Among other things, Stern has helped focus attention on Wal-Mart, and has linked with Greenwald’s film in that effort. From a post on HuffPo last winter:
Stern at HuffPo on Wal-Mart
It’s good to see that the SEIU’s Web site is linking to American Blackout, with reference to end the blackout.
On the efficacy of holding elections to choose union leadership, there appears to be a debate that we might ask Andy about next time:
Note this comes from an article from the Chicago Tribune Business page.
elections for union leaders?
The process SEIU had for endorsing candidates was pretty cool. Stern goes into it in the book. Rather than having union leaders pick the guy based on backroom dealing, Stern asks candidates to hang out with union members and then union members make the choice.
Can anyone answer this question. Does the DLC help, hinder, or neither, worker organization?
America isn’t turning to the Right. Think, does the public want Social Security overturned? Do they want to do away with the liberal school system? Do they want to do away with interstate highways and airports? Do they want to do away with Medicare and Medicaid? No. There are no major Liberal programs the public wants to be rid of.
If anything the country is turning more and more Free. The acceptance of Blacks, Gays, Women, Handicapped, etc. is growing steadily and the Republicans can’t stop it. And, now with the Internet, people are talking and learning from one another at an amazing pace. The media and government are feeling the heat (or soon will be) and this kind of power of the people will change things in many ways.
Instead, what I believe we’re facing is the growing power of Corporate America. It’s bleeding the public dry and killing off the unions in the process — all in the name of money, even as devalued as it is becoming. Naturally, the Republican party (and some Democrats), being a tool of the Rich, helps them.
The middle-class feels the squeeze (extreme cases such as school shootings are obvious indications) and loves the idea of tax cuts, so they are tricked into supporting Republicans. They don’t seem to realize the real fight has to be about much bigger things.
I head on public radio yesterday that the very first WalMart has been unionized…in China! C’mon America, get off yer butts and unionize WalMarts here too!
Seriously, Corporate America is going to dump Americans in every way they can to get cheaper labor abroad, but Americans can’t just redevelop a new kind of business environment from scratch. It’s truly a problem of the ‘enemy within’. Unfortunately there’s no easy answer to fix this slow bleeding death of power shifting more and more to the Corporations. Anybody who has a possible answer is immediately branded as crank, ivory tower idiot, Communist or traitor. It’s an unenviable position for all Americans; the Rich might’ve felt the problem too, as some did during the ‘29 Crash and aftermath, but today they can all too easily live in isolated splendor and do business internationally, with no regard to how their household help can survive on the minimum wage.
Actually, I feel the Republican party has nothing to offer America and they know it. In fact, I think a lot of their stone-wall opposition to Dems and all this international nonsense is simply a diversion from even more fundamental economic issues which would rock our nation to it’s core if they were ever discussed.
Meanwhile, we all wring our hands over Osama bin Laden and Saudi oil wealth mixed with Islam. Maybe we should’ve moved on to other energy sources some years ago. Maybe we owe a lot of our problems to the Greedy Rich who like the easy profits of oil and the combustion engine automobile, rather than looking out for the country. Now, we’ve got the environmental damage to the ozone on top of more immediate mortal dangers. Gee thanks rich guys!
Our only course for now is to fix the election process, get rid of the Republican administration and start fixing things pronto.
I wonder how we could get rid of Bush/Cheney without the Republicans throwing their noses out of joint over a President Pelosi, or whomever would be next in line.
What we really need is A Country that Works for We the People and I don’t think we have that right now, despite the ever growing corporate profits or our supposed international military supremacy.
They aren’t immune, and I’d like more data on this. It’s just my gut feeling that union members are less prone to race-baiting, simply because when demographically placed against groups they are just more likely to vote ‘D’.
Pach,
At a basic level, they are investing a lot more of their budget in organizing instead of services.
SEIU also tries to change industry structures to allow sustained profitability and unions. For instance, rather than unionizing one cleaning firm and putting the unionized firm at a competitive disadvantage, SEIU tries to unionize all cleaning firms in the area so that all the firms can compete on non-wage factors.
There’s more in the book.
From a Lesley Stahl interview, on why Stern sees unions as bridging the gap between rich and poor:
60 Minutes on Stern — May 16 or so
Actually, I feel the Republican party has nothing to offer America and they know it. In fact, I think a lot of their stone-wall opposition to Dems and all this international nonsense is simply a diversion from even more fundamental economic issues which would rock our nation to it’s core if they were ever discussed.
MarkH, if this doesn’t describe our times in a nutshell…
Nice rant. I’d like to hear us discuss about the fundamental economic issues, even if it’s just among ourselves.
Swopa @
18
Also parallels the post-WW II boom in home ownership (went from 43.6% in 1940 to 61.9% in 1960) and the rise of the middle class. Unionization is one of the best tools to fight the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few that GWB has been doing so much to facilitate, and it’s amazing that Stern has done so much with the SEIU, because the people he is successfully organizing are the most vulnerable in Bush’s America.
From the great film about organizing miners… Matewan (1987)
Joe Kenehan (James Earl Jones): You think this man is the enemy? Huh? This is a worker! Any union keeps this man out ain’t a union, it’s a goddam club! They got you fightin’ white against colored, native against foreign, hollow against hollow, when you know there ain’t but two sides in this world - them that work and them that don’t. You work, they don’t. That’s all you get to know about the enemy.
The book is good, and I haven’t finished it yet.
Unions in China and Wal Mart! What is wrong with this picture? I can’t wait to find the time to look into this further. China allows Unions? Then we read news from Jordan Barab of rulings which split the very core (claiming so many more employees as management) of union membership from the inside by our own government.
I am forty five miles from Wal Mart world HQ (with my back turned towards it). Where can I find others who are ready to work for change at the source?
Just learning here so this is probably a silly question. Are progressives and unions actually working for a national health care idea or just secure employee benefits? If not a national idea aren’t we at odds with each other?
Pachacutec, how do you list progressives on this in your developing progressive platform?
Mike Gibson @ 30
Also Barbara Kopple — American Dream and Harlan County USA. Undermining labor rights in this country has a long, organized, well-financed and brutal history.
Mommybrain @ 28
After America went off the gold standard and had to send dollars offshore to pay for oil, there was nothing to stop those foreign dollars from coming back and buying out US assets. This threatened the people who give money to politicians to fix their problems.
Outsourcing manufacturing jobs was a way to keep the valuation of US companies high (in order to stave off foreign purchase of them, which has gradually happened anyway) and that was what slammed unions the hardest. There were other problems, too, but the union bargaining position was fundamentally most weakened by the net outflow of jobs. A more general “war on workers” environment has predominated in America ever since. Actually it’s a “war on anything that erodes our profits.”
The most basic dynamic is there was nothing to peg the dollar’s value to except control of oil and a strong army, and the time is running out on that game as we speak. We need a new currency basis, and “Better Energy” (what Gore is all about) should be the new one. Instead we’re flushing our future down the wells of the Mideast, which one day will be dry.
(End rant.)
Some of the things about the DLC:
This group supports the “The No Child Left Behind Act”.
Supports some forms of Social Security privatization.
Supports NAFTA and CAFTA.
Opposed any filibuster of Alito.
Strongly supported the invasion of Iraq.
Attacked Howard Dean as an out of touch liberal.
Dismissed Michael Moore as “anti-American”.
One prominent member of the DLC, Marshall Wittmann is a legislative director for the Christian Coalition.
THERE’S MORE. Much more.
[delurking] speaking of fdl books this donation is for Marcy’s book. [relurking]…thanks to all for prayers and positive energy as I try to regain my spiritual and emotional equilibrium, hence not politics/blogging as usual. Please tell Imm hi/miss talking w him. hImm?
Matt, Haven’t read Andy’s book (yet but added it to my reading list) can you relate the key/core things that the progressive movement can learn from unions?
“American casualties in Iraq rise sharply
Growing U.S. role in staving off civil war leads to most wounded since 2004″
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15176088/
The majority of soldiers in the Iraq War, are the children of the working women and men of America.
I’ve had some minor experience with the UAW, and man, that is an organization in dire need of reorganization of priorities. They recently called the union to protest the conditions of teachers in Oaxaca. Not to put to fine a point on it, I really don’t care about those teachers; I care about ours. I care that there’s no living wage for workers here in LA.
As for their organizational efforts, they are sorely lacking. The call for that particularly useless rally went out hours (not days) before the rally itself was to be held, which may account for its presumably small turnout, as it didn’t hit any reporting in the LA Times.
The leadership, it seems, is paralyzed more by fear of unionbusting rather than anything else. Any contact with people that is not in-person is strongly discouraged, and also completely out of line with how political discourse works in this century. All forms must be filled out in triplicate, and email is one-way.
There are so many ways that this union could become relevant, but apparently, their inertia is so powerful and their fear is so palpable, I’m not convinced of its efficacy.
Sorry. Venting.
Corporations have been taken over by the ‘bean counters.’ Companies are bought by Takeover Tycoons who know absolutely nothing about the business they are buying. All they want are higher profits. So they shred the company into bits….the product or service turns to crap, employee (what’s left of them) morale goes south, upper management gives itself HUGE raises, and we end up with the rotten state of American business today.
We need Leadership in Washington, DC to stand up to the Business Roundtable and tell these greedy jerks that the party is over…the trough is now closed…Gilded Age II has come to a close. Of course, that means that We, the People (the Beast) have got to demand this.
Can’t wait to read this book!
Mark,
That’s a huge question. I guess I’d say that if there’s one theme it’s that we all rise or fall together.
scarecrow @
27
Well, one of my questions would be, to Alan Greenspan at least, is “is there even such a thing as ‘democratic capitalism?’ “
There may have been such when Alan was a lad, but I wonder if the “Age of Greed” put paid to the concept. After all, if you can buy a bigger house with a bigger pool if you own the company by the simple expedient of outsourcing jobs to India or China or Nicaragua, where you don’t have to pay living wages and provide health care, etc., by throwing your employees under the bus, well, why the hell not? Your bottom line is better, and if you’re a large enough corporation your stockholders giggle with glee.
Also, I have seen unions do some of the stupidest things imaginable. When I was a kid in New York City there were 7, count them, 7, daily newspapers. After a particularly ugly printers’ union strike we were down to 3. ‘Scuse me? Why create a position that is so intransigent that half of your jobs are lost? Remember the air traffic controllers? I think they were right, but they called Reagan’s bluff, which wasn’t a bluff at all. As I understand it the plight of the air traffic controller is worse now than it was then. (I’m also old enough to remember Jimmy Hoffa and some of the other “big boys” and their little games.)
Which brings me back to the concept of “democratic capitalism.” Really… How exactly does that work? The workers own the means of production? Where have I heard THAT before???
However, I do in my heart of hearts believe that unions are a good and proud and necessary thing. Gee, instead of “democratic capitalism,” how would Netroots Capitalism work? Sorry for the rant, but while I grieve for the true union movement I’m sanguine enough to remember why it has become less and less important on the national scene.
Great post Matt S and fascinating thread.
I fear a new Great Depression is the only thing that will wake this country up.
I’m confused -
my limited recall says there was a split from AFL CIO by SEIU and Teamsters in 05 - which of course gladdened Rove et al, BUT read something in the last few months that says there were stirrings of rapprochement primarily through the upcoming mid terms and 08 of course - correct ?
AFSCME is AFL-CIO affiliated org., does their endorsement of Lamont mean there could be a full org endorsement for Ned, b/c I thought AFL-CIO had bullheadedly stuck by Liarman
I’m an enthusiastic member of a local of UFCW. I am most concerned about the recent decision by the NLRB about who is and isn’t a supervisor. In the library where I work, the middle management, who are not represented, are increasingly being exploited in terms of hours, uncompensated overtime, manipulations of schedules, etc., and also in being held accountable for things that do not have the authority to control or effectively influence. More jobs have been redefined as management. It is a bad position and slowly getting worse. It distresses me to see this likely to expand. Whether or not it expands in my shop, it will in many others.
Akosua @
44
Exellent point. As I understand it charge nurses are now considered “supervisors.” Well, not exactly. Charge nurses supervise patients and their treatment. However, as probably the most senior nurses on the floor isn’t it nice to be able to cut their overtime???
It would be lovely to cut their overtime.
As I understand it, traditionally managers can’t be in the union because they are party to confidential personnel actions, in some cases with adverse effects on union members. However, it sounds like under the new rules, a charge nurse, or someone who “directs” other people, such as “please go over there and do that” is now a supervisor, even though they do not participate in any confidential personnel matters. It becomes far easier to exploit people when they are no longer represented.
Marion in Savannah @ 45
People living closer to the edge of financial ruin spend as they can until it’s gone. When they have more there is less living by crisis management and crime - an act of rebellious desperation and resentment.
The economy runs on consumer demand. People who need lots stoke it just fine.
No decent income, no discretionary spending …. sooner or later comes the crash.
Then the rich are big fish in a small pond and everyone has less ability to act as they wish … them too.
Andy Stern’s unionizing the service industry. That’s an achievement in itself.
I belonged to an AFL-CIO affilated union, and was my local lodge’s veep, grievance chair and I sat on the legislative committee.
The gripes we have with the DLC, Rahm,and No Mo Joe can be ascribed to a lot of union leadership - out of touch with their members, and comfortable in an affluent lifestyle the membership pays for.
Stern is a welcome break from that, and SEIU’s breakaway from the AFL-CIO, though heartbreaking, may be what is necessary to create a new paradigm, just as supporting Lamont was a necessary step to get the attention of Democratic leadership.
Jane has recognized this from the jump, and is to be commended for inviting labor to the lake.
I am convinced if we turn the corner, history is going to remember FDL as one of the reasons.
we are hosting a book party for andy in los angeles, wed. octll, at l2.30 at l0510 culver blvd, the offices of brave new films, come if you are around.. robert