Comments on: Lieberman Loves Him Some Hastert http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/05/lieberman-loves-him-some-hastert/ Firedoglake weblog Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:11:37 -0600 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: DSouth http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/05/lieberman-loves-him-some-hastert/#comment-327789 DSouth Sat, 07 Oct 2006 14:08:10 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/05/lieberman-loves-him-some-hastert/#comment-327789 <p>Joe is a republican. He’s lying to his voters. What a traitor. He should just officially change his party to republican. He’s no more independent than a new born baby.</p> Joe is a republican. He’s lying to his voters. What a traitor. He should just officially change his party to republican. He’s no more independent than a new born baby.

]]> By: DSouth http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/05/lieberman-loves-him-some-hastert/#comment-327785 DSouth Sat, 07 Oct 2006 14:04:39 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/05/lieberman-loves-him-some-hastert/#comment-327785 <p>Joe is a republican. He’s lying to his voters. What a traitor. He should just officially just his party to republican. He’s no more independent than a new born baby.</p> Joe is a republican. He’s lying to his voters. What a traitor. He should just officially just his party to republican. He’s no more independent than a new born baby.

]]> By: munkee http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/05/lieberman-loves-him-some-hastert/#comment-327640 munkee Sat, 07 Oct 2006 06:11:51 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/05/lieberman-loves-him-some-hastert/#comment-327640 <p><a href="#comment-326021"><em>Eli @<br /> 5 </em></a></p> <blockquote><p>I would like to hear Joe explain how covering up for a sex offender has no partisan dimension whatsoever, and if not, what other explanation there is for it.</p></blockquote> <p>Maybe Joe likes little boys too. Doesn’t want to be a hypocrite. After the past 6 years anything is possible. Surreal.</p> Eli @
5

I would like to hear Joe explain how covering up for a sex offender has no partisan dimension whatsoever, and if not, what other explanation there is for it.

Maybe Joe likes little boys too. Doesn’t want to be a hypocrite. After the past 6 years anything is possible. Surreal.

]]> By: munkee http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/05/lieberman-loves-him-some-hastert/#comment-327633 munkee Sat, 07 Oct 2006 05:57:42 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/05/lieberman-loves-him-some-hastert/#comment-327633 <p><a href="#comment-326019"><em>Cozumel @<br /> 4 </em></a></p> <blockquote><p>Olbermann ROCKS!</p> <p><a href="http://hollywoodreporter.com/thr/columns/the_pulse_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003123893&imw=Y">http://hollywoodreporter.com/t.....&imw=Y</a></p></blockquote> <p><a href="http://thankyoukeitholbermann.org/">http://thankyoukeitholbermann.org/</a></p> <p>Give Keith a thumbs up.</p> Cozumel @
4

Olbermann ROCKS!

http://hollywoodreporter.com/t…..&imw=Y

http://thankyoukeitholbermann.org/

Give Keith a thumbs up.

]]> By: munkee http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/05/lieberman-loves-him-some-hastert/#comment-327628 munkee Sat, 07 Oct 2006 05:53:24 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/05/lieberman-loves-him-some-hastert/#comment-327628 <p><a href="#comment-326016"><em>SusanD @<br /> 1 </em></a></p> <blockquote><p>I do not think “partisan” means what Joe thinks it means.</p></blockquote> <p>Joe wuz drunk. He meant to say the “party is on” baby!</p> SusanD @
1

I do not think “partisan” means what Joe thinks it means.

Joe wuz drunk. He meant to say the “party is on” baby!

]]> By: Mike http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/05/lieberman-loves-him-some-hastert/#comment-327160 Mike Fri, 06 Oct 2006 22:47:02 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/05/lieberman-loves-him-some-hastert/#comment-327160 <p>Leiberman - Incredible! Definitely an Olympic-class Asshole.</p> Leiberman – Incredible! Definitely an Olympic-class Asshole.

]]> By: mui http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/05/lieberman-loves-him-some-hastert/#comment-326595 mui Fri, 06 Oct 2006 14:33:54 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/05/lieberman-loves-him-some-hastert/#comment-326595 <p>Liarman alert! HoJoe is appearing on local CT tv talking about how asking Foley to resign and having an investigation is putting principle above partisan politics or something like that. I kid you not. And basically he’s misrepresenting himself by implying he’s taking the initiative. He’s got slick greasy maneuvers and it’s very hard to convince folks that he’s lying. they think you are “partisan” or paranoid–unless you carefully lay the evidence before them. And it takes a lot of explaining to unravel all his untruthiness. It’s very frustrating. There are still people in CT who think Lamont is a “Republican” because of that vile ad Lieberman put on tv.<br /> Agree with Valley Girl and others about the name recognition thing and associatons. It’s easy to change their minds with a little phone list and a dedicated persuasion script though.</p> Liarman alert! HoJoe is appearing on local CT tv talking about how asking Foley to resign and having an investigation is putting principle above partisan politics or something like that. I kid you not. And basically he’s misrepresenting himself by implying he’s taking the initiative. He’s got slick greasy maneuvers and it’s very hard to convince folks that he’s lying. they think you are “partisan” or paranoid–unless you carefully lay the evidence before them. And it takes a lot of explaining to unravel all his untruthiness. It’s very frustrating. There are still people in CT who think Lamont is a “Republican” because of that vile ad Lieberman put on tv.
Agree with Valley Girl and others about the name recognition thing and associatons. It’s easy to change their minds with a little phone list and a dedicated persuasion script though.

]]> By: pluege http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/05/lieberman-loves-him-some-hastert/#comment-326523 pluege Fri, 06 Oct 2006 13:24:46 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/05/lieberman-loves-him-some-hastert/#comment-326523 <p>it is abundantly clear that losermon is a republican. it behooves democrats to force his hand now to declare his party switch. Doing so would unmuck the election, therby improving Lamont’s chances of winning, and would show democrats to have some spine and stand for something (not always calculating election politics like another major party we known that will sell out minors for politics).<br /> .</p> it is abundantly clear that losermon is a republican. it behooves democrats to force his hand now to declare his party switch. Doing so would unmuck the election, therby improving Lamont’s chances of winning, and would show democrats to have some spine and stand for something (not always calculating election politics like another major party we known that will sell out minors for politics).
.

]]> By: erik28com http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/05/lieberman-loves-him-some-hastert/#comment-326438 erik28com Fri, 06 Oct 2006 11:29:51 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/05/lieberman-loves-him-some-hastert/#comment-326438 <p>How could a blue state even consider re-electing this guy. CT you mystify me sometimes.</p> How could a blue state even consider re-electing this guy. CT you mystify me sometimes.

]]> By: kevinofburbank http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/05/lieberman-loves-him-some-hastert/#comment-326432 kevinofburbank Fri, 06 Oct 2006 11:11:58 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/05/lieberman-loves-him-some-hastert/#comment-326432 <p>So here’s my question: When the Dems pick up five seats but Lieberstain wins, then switches parties, can we all collectively go slap the shit out of the Dem “leadership” that did not vociferously demand that Holy Joe withdraw?</p> So here’s my question: When the Dems pick up five seats but Lieberstain wins, then switches parties, can we all collectively go slap the shit out of the Dem “leadership” that did not vociferously demand that Holy Joe withdraw?

]]>