Comments on: Not Buying It http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/04/not-buying-it/ Firedoglake weblog Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:06:40 -0600 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: EvilDrPuma http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/04/not-buying-it/#comment-324227 EvilDrPuma Wed, 04 Oct 2006 22:14:18 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/04/not-buying-it/#comment-324227 <p><a href="#comment-323726"><em>Frank Probst @ 51 </em></a></p> <blockquote><p><a href="#comment-323720"><em>*xyz @ 45</em></a></p> <blockquote><p>FYI - Rasmussen rumors are flying that Lieberman is now up by 10 on Lamont. It is in the comments at the official Lamont blog. </p> <p>Just FYI. Too early to get worried, although I hope Lamont keeps bringing in the big guns to campaign for him (Clark is a great start) and cranks his ad campaign up a notch in terms of the volume of ads he is running. Not that I am an expert on this.</p></blockquote> <p>Don’t worry about it. The last time they ran against each other, Lieberman was up by a lot more than that at this point in the race.</p></blockquote> <p>Besides, as I recall from 2004, Rasmussen is fond of sampling out of proportion to party representation (i.e., their samples often include a larger percentage of Republicans than the population it is supposed to represent). Don’t trust this poll. There’s a very good chance it’s rigged.</p> Frank Probst @ 51

*xyz @ 45

FYI – Rasmussen rumors are flying that Lieberman is now up by 10 on Lamont. It is in the comments at the official Lamont blog.

Just FYI. Too early to get worried, although I hope Lamont keeps bringing in the big guns to campaign for him (Clark is a great start) and cranks his ad campaign up a notch in terms of the volume of ads he is running. Not that I am an expert on this.

Don’t worry about it. The last time they ran against each other, Lieberman was up by a lot more than that at this point in the race.

Besides, as I recall from 2004, Rasmussen is fond of sampling out of proportion to party representation (i.e., their samples often include a larger percentage of Republicans than the population it is supposed to represent). Don’t trust this poll. There’s a very good chance it’s rigged.

]]> By: Margot http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/04/not-buying-it/#comment-323956 Margot Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:43:13 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/04/not-buying-it/#comment-323956 <p>punaise…it is SO good to have you back!</p> punaise…it is SO good to have you back!

]]> By: Margot http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/04/not-buying-it/#comment-323945 Margot Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:35:27 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/04/not-buying-it/#comment-323945 <p><a href="#comment-323906"><em>Rayne @<br /> 193 </em></a></p> <blockquote><p>Anybody else having problems with the site?</p> <p>Have to scroll down a long ways to get to the post; it’s like the table formatting is broken.</p> <p>??</p></blockquote> <p>Me too, Rayne.</p> Rayne @
193

Anybody else having problems with the site?

Have to scroll down a long ways to get to the post; it’s like the table formatting is broken.

??

Me too, Rayne.

]]> By: punaise http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/04/not-buying-it/#comment-323926 punaise Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:18:09 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/04/not-buying-it/#comment-323926 <p><a href="#comment-323906"><em>Rayne @ 193</em></a></p> <blockquote><p>Anybody else having problems with the site?</p> <p>Have to scroll down a long ways to get to the post; it’s like the table formatting is broken.</p> <p>??</p></blockquote> <p>main page is not loading on this end</p> Rayne @ 193

Anybody else having problems with the site?

Have to scroll down a long ways to get to the post; it’s like the table formatting is broken.

??

main page is not loading on this end

]]> By: BobbyG http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/04/not-buying-it/#comment-323918 BobbyG Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:12:34 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/04/not-buying-it/#comment-323918 <p>Buh-bye, Kirk…</p> <p><a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/10/top_gop_staffer.html">http://blogs.abcnews.com/thebl.....affer.html</a></p> <p>Time to lawyer up.<br /> _</p> Buh-bye, Kirk…

http://blogs.abcnews.com/thebl…..affer.html

Time to lawyer up.
_

]]> By: Dave Latchaw http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/04/not-buying-it/#comment-323908 Dave Latchaw Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:06:42 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/04/not-buying-it/#comment-323908 <p>CNN is reporting that Fordham has resigned. No link - just saw this on the tube.</p> CNN is reporting that Fordham has resigned. No link – just saw this on the tube.

]]> By: Rayne http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/04/not-buying-it/#comment-323906 Rayne Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:05:27 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/04/not-buying-it/#comment-323906 <p>Anybody else having problems with the site?</p> <p>Have to scroll down a long ways to get to the post; it’s like the table formatting is broken.</p> <p>??</p> Anybody else having problems with the site?

Have to scroll down a long ways to get to the post; it’s like the table formatting is broken.

??

]]> By: Prober http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/04/not-buying-it/#comment-323904 Prober Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:04:00 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/04/not-buying-it/#comment-323904 <p>Fordham resigns!</p> Fordham resigns!

]]> By: Cozumel http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/04/not-buying-it/#comment-323902 Cozumel Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:03:20 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/04/not-buying-it/#comment-323902 <p>Breaking CNN….</p> <p>Fordham (sp) fired</p> Breaking CNN….

Fordham (sp) fired

]]> By: angie http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/04/not-buying-it/#comment-323898 angie Wed, 04 Oct 2006 17:59:49 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/04/not-buying-it/#comment-323898 <p>new thread.</p> new thread.

]]>