<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Late Nite FDL: Calling Nancy Grace!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/01/late-nite-fdl-calling-nancy-grace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/01/late-nite-fdl-calling-nancy-grace/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:48:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ralphie</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/01/late-nite-fdl-calling-nancy-grace/#comment-321807</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralphie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 14:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/01/late-nite-fdl-calling-nancy-grace/#comment-321807</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It’s not the hair, TRex, it’s the false eyelashes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That’s the secret to the Nancy Grace “cheap hooker” look.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s not the hair, TRex, it’s the false eyelashes.</p>
<p>That’s the secret to the Nancy Grace “cheap hooker” look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smotrezebie</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/01/late-nite-fdl-calling-nancy-grace/#comment-321638</link>
		<dc:creator>smotrezebie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 08:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/01/late-nite-fdl-calling-nancy-grace/#comment-321638</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Saw a couple of remarks on N.Grace’s hair and general gestalt, but did no one else notice that she looks like a larval stage of Linda Tripp?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw a couple of remarks on N.Grace’s hair and general gestalt, but did no one else notice that she looks like a larval stage of Linda Tripp?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nikto</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/01/late-nite-fdl-calling-nancy-grace/#comment-321257</link>
		<dc:creator>nikto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 02:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/01/late-nite-fdl-calling-nancy-grace/#comment-321257</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Foley is what &lt;b&gt;GOP-’da-Feelya’ &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
is all about!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Grace should be on that story&lt;br /&gt;
like frosting-on-cake.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Translation:&lt;br /&gt;
GOP-’da-Feelya’=&lt;b&gt;GOPedophilia&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does that qualify for a “duh”?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foley is what <b>GOP-’da-Feelya’ </b><br />
is all about!</p>
<p>Grace should be on that story<br />
like frosting-on-cake.</p>
<p>Translation:<br />
GOP-’da-Feelya’=<b>GOPedophilia</b></p>
<p>Does that qualify for a “duh”?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webecelts</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/01/late-nite-fdl-calling-nancy-grace/#comment-320700</link>
		<dc:creator>webecelts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/01/late-nite-fdl-calling-nancy-grace/#comment-320700</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I remember this picture, but, shouldn’t her head be bobbing????&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember this picture, but, shouldn’t her head be bobbing????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bilhelm</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/01/late-nite-fdl-calling-nancy-grace/#comment-320550</link>
		<dc:creator>Bilhelm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/01/late-nite-fdl-calling-nancy-grace/#comment-320550</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-320189&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;LarryK @ 312 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Y’all, here is the link to send comments to Ms. Nancy (I hope I’m not repeating someone else) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5c.html?24&quot;&gt;http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5c.html?24&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You’re a Peach!  Trex rules!  Nancy Grace needs a close encounter with a woodchipper..&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-320189"><em>LarryK @ 312 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Y’all, here is the link to send comments to Ms. Nancy (I hope I’m not repeating someone else) </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5c.html?24">http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5c.html?24</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>You’re a Peach!  Trex rules!  Nancy Grace needs a close encounter with a woodchipper..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political Waves &#187; The Chickenhawk Chronicles: following the engorged naughty parts</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/01/late-nite-fdl-calling-nancy-grace/#comment-320479</link>
		<dc:creator>Political Waves &#187; The Chickenhawk Chronicles: following the engorged naughty parts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/01/late-nite-fdl-calling-nancy-grace/#comment-320479</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[…] [Now ex-] Representative Mark Foley is quite a piece of work — and although I am mortified that the [a]merican public is ho-hum-dumb about the rape of the United States Constitution, they are eager for the details of the molesting of Congressional pages. That’s the “Nancy Grace” syndrome — we’re fascinated by the salacious. The man/woman hijinks’s of Slick Willy so captivated the country that when the Pub’s stood on his neck to wave their “virtue” flag, everybody stood up with them … the Dem’s were derelicts to continue to support Bill, because they obviously did not support national “values.” [And let me say clearly that the childish hypocrisy of the [a]merican public is stunning — “let he who is without sin,” yadda.] […]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] [Now ex-] Representative Mark Foley is quite a piece of work — and although I am mortified that the [a]merican public is ho-hum-dumb about the rape of the United States Constitution, they are eager for the details of the molesting of Congressional pages. That’s the “Nancy Grace” syndrome — we’re fascinated by the salacious. The man/woman hijinks’s of Slick Willy so captivated the country that when the Pub’s stood on his neck to wave their “virtue” flag, everybody stood up with them … the Dem’s were derelicts to continue to support Bill, because they obviously did not support national “values.” [And let me say clearly that the childish hypocrisy of the [a]merican public is stunning — “let he who is without sin,” yadda.] […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cugel</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/01/late-nite-fdl-calling-nancy-grace/#comment-320363</link>
		<dc:creator>Cugel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/01/late-nite-fdl-calling-nancy-grace/#comment-320363</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-319639&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Dover Bitch @&lt;br /&gt;
                19              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I said it yesterday… I expect this to be Nancy Grace’s reason for being now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Copied from the last thread… did nobody catch this in MTP? Calling Lil’ Debbie!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;MR. RUSSERT: Is it fair that Senator DeWine is caught up in this whole perception of corruption because it’s the governor, Congressman Ney, Jack Abramoff, Mark Foley, but it’s not Mike DeWine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;REP. BROWN: Well, it’s, it’s a bit more than a perception. Thomas Noe has contributed to money to Mike DeWine, so has Jack Abramoff. Senator DeWine has…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MR. RUSSERT: Thomas Noe being someone involved with Governor Taft.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;REP. BROWN: Who is, who is, is now convicted of a crime and probably will serve time, may already be in prison, I’m not sure. He was a big Bush backer, close to Taft, funded much of the Republican Party. I mean, Senator DeWine has benefited, as have so many other Republicans have benefitted from this political machine in Ohio. It’s right in the midst of the culture of corruption. But, but it’s more than that, it’s ultimately, you know, who you’re going to—who you’re going to trust to fight for the middle class when you see, not just what’s happening in Columbus, but in Washington. Mike DeWine received more than $400,000 from oil and gas interests, votes for an energy bill…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MR. RUSSERT: But, Congressman Brown…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;REP. BROWN: …that they wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;MR. RUSSERT: …one-third of Abramoff’s money went to Democrats.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;REP. BROWN: Maybe it did, it didn’t go to me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That’s just a flat lie! Where did they come up with that? 1/3 of Abramoff’s money did NOT go to Democrats. In fact as has been constantly pointed out but the talking smeg-heads keep repeating the lies!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some of Abramoff’s clients contributed to Democrats, but he DISCOURAGED them from doing so. Once they signed on with him their giving to Democrats dramatically declined as has been repeatedly pointed out.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-319639"><em>Dover Bitch @<br />
                19              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>I said it yesterday… I expect this to be Nancy Grace’s reason for being now.</p>
<p>Copied from the last thread… did nobody catch this in MTP? Calling Lil’ Debbie!</p>
<blockquote><p>MR. RUSSERT: Is it fair that Senator DeWine is caught up in this whole perception of corruption because it’s the governor, Congressman Ney, Jack Abramoff, Mark Foley, but it’s not Mike DeWine.</p>
<p>REP. BROWN: Well, it’s, it’s a bit more than a perception. Thomas Noe has contributed to money to Mike DeWine, so has Jack Abramoff. Senator DeWine has…</p>
<p>MR. RUSSERT: Thomas Noe being someone involved with Governor Taft.</p>
<p>REP. BROWN: Who is, who is, is now convicted of a crime and probably will serve time, may already be in prison, I’m not sure. He was a big Bush backer, close to Taft, funded much of the Republican Party. I mean, Senator DeWine has benefited, as have so many other Republicans have benefitted from this political machine in Ohio. It’s right in the midst of the culture of corruption. But, but it’s more than that, it’s ultimately, you know, who you’re going to—who you’re going to trust to fight for the middle class when you see, not just what’s happening in Columbus, but in Washington. Mike DeWine received more than $400,000 from oil and gas interests, votes for an energy bill…</p>
<p>MR. RUSSERT: But, Congressman Brown…</p>
<p>REP. BROWN: …that they wrote.</p>
<p><b>MR. RUSSERT: …one-third of Abramoff’s money went to Democrats.</b></p>
<p>REP. BROWN: Maybe it did, it didn’t go to me.</p>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p>That’s just a flat lie! Where did they come up with that? 1/3 of Abramoff’s money did NOT go to Democrats. In fact as has been constantly pointed out but the talking smeg-heads keep repeating the lies!</p>
<p>Some of Abramoff’s clients contributed to Democrats, but he DISCOURAGED them from doing so. Once they signed on with him their giving to Democrats dramatically declined as has been repeatedly pointed out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LarryK</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/01/late-nite-fdl-calling-nancy-grace/#comment-320189</link>
		<dc:creator>LarryK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/01/late-nite-fdl-calling-nancy-grace/#comment-320189</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Y’all, here is the link to send comments to Ms. Nancy (I hope I’m not repeating someone else) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5c.html?24&quot;&gt;http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5c.html?24&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y’all, here is the link to send comments to Ms. Nancy (I hope I’m not repeating someone else) </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5c.html?24">http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5c.html?24</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: punaise</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/01/late-nite-fdl-calling-nancy-grace/#comment-320165</link>
		<dc:creator>punaise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/01/late-nite-fdl-calling-nancy-grace/#comment-320165</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;TRex: Grace, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wordreference.com/fren/garce&quot;&gt;Garce&lt;/a&gt;, it’s all so confusing…from ze French:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;garce&lt;/em&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
garce	Pejoratif	nf	bitch Very informal&lt;br /&gt;
garce	(insulte)	nf	bitch (insult)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TRex: Grace, <a href="http://www.wordreference.com/fren/garce">Garce</a>, it’s all so confusing…from ze French:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>garce</em>:<br />
garce	Pejoratif	nf	bitch Very informal<br />
garce	(insulte)	nf	bitch (insult)</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angie</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/10/01/late-nite-fdl-calling-nancy-grace/#comment-319996</link>
		<dc:creator>angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 13:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/10/01/late-nite-fdl-calling-nancy-grace/#comment-319996</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-319926&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;selise @&lt;br /&gt;
                281              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-319923&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;David Ehrenstein @ 278&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mpetrelis.blogspot.com/2006/10/photo-of-foley-page-at-gop-confab.html&quot;&gt;HERE’S FOLEY WITH ONE OF THE PAGES!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;david - i beg you to think not only of the feelings of the young people who may have been harmed by foley, but also of the feelings of the young people who may now be harmed by public shaming because of their past as a page with foley. as we (rightly) attack foley, i beg you to protect the identity and feelings of the pages.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;selise, that picture is one I also found on Friday and it is from the young man’s own blog writeup on the rethuglican national convention.   He did put it out there &lt;em&gt;himself&lt;/em&gt; with lots of other photos.  It makes me feel a &lt;em&gt;little&lt;/em&gt; easier about the use of the photo.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dru @ 284– I never knew that about Nance.  Sheesh.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-319926"><em>selise @<br />
                281              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-319923"><em>David Ehrenstein @ 278</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://mpetrelis.blogspot.com/2006/10/photo-of-foley-page-at-gop-confab.html">HERE’S FOLEY WITH ONE OF THE PAGES!</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>david &#8211; i beg you to think not only of the feelings of the young people who may have been harmed by foley, but also of the feelings of the young people who may now be harmed by public shaming because of their past as a page with foley. as we (rightly) attack foley, i beg you to protect the identity and feelings of the pages.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>selise, that picture is one I also found on Friday and it is from the young man’s own blog writeup on the rethuglican national convention.   He did put it out there <em>himself</em> with lots of other photos.  It makes me feel a <em>little</em> easier about the use of the photo.</p>
<p>Dru @ 284– I never knew that about Nance.  Sheesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
